Transfer Function, what does s Stand for












0












$begingroup$


Trying to understand what the variable s is for transfer functions (if there is a common accepted use of it). In the problem space I am working in, control theory, I believe I have seen definitions of "short period poles", "complex Laplace transform variable", and at
http://web.mit.edu/2.14/www/Handouts/PoleZero.pdf it describes s as s = sigma + j * omega (I guess as a complex variable). Any insight into one of these being correct or if I am missing a better common use, that would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Check out the Wikipedia Transfer Function page. I don't know what a "short period pole" is, but the other two definitions seem correct to me (even if not providing much insight).
    $endgroup$
    – NickD
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:55










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, I appreciate the second opinion, you'd be surprised how hard it is to google any variation of "transfer function s" since every webpage has an s in it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Danny
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No doubt that $s$ is a complex variable in Laplace transform. Decomposing it into $sigma+jomega$ way is dangerous because it tends to say (what you find in old books) that setting $sigma=0$ you can reach the Fourier Transform. The best way to consider the $s$ in a Laplace Transform is as a purely formal parameter.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:53










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you Jean! Great answer :D
    $endgroup$
    – Danny
    Dec 12 '18 at 21:38
















0












$begingroup$


Trying to understand what the variable s is for transfer functions (if there is a common accepted use of it). In the problem space I am working in, control theory, I believe I have seen definitions of "short period poles", "complex Laplace transform variable", and at
http://web.mit.edu/2.14/www/Handouts/PoleZero.pdf it describes s as s = sigma + j * omega (I guess as a complex variable). Any insight into one of these being correct or if I am missing a better common use, that would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Check out the Wikipedia Transfer Function page. I don't know what a "short period pole" is, but the other two definitions seem correct to me (even if not providing much insight).
    $endgroup$
    – NickD
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:55










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, I appreciate the second opinion, you'd be surprised how hard it is to google any variation of "transfer function s" since every webpage has an s in it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Danny
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No doubt that $s$ is a complex variable in Laplace transform. Decomposing it into $sigma+jomega$ way is dangerous because it tends to say (what you find in old books) that setting $sigma=0$ you can reach the Fourier Transform. The best way to consider the $s$ in a Laplace Transform is as a purely formal parameter.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:53










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you Jean! Great answer :D
    $endgroup$
    – Danny
    Dec 12 '18 at 21:38














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Trying to understand what the variable s is for transfer functions (if there is a common accepted use of it). In the problem space I am working in, control theory, I believe I have seen definitions of "short period poles", "complex Laplace transform variable", and at
http://web.mit.edu/2.14/www/Handouts/PoleZero.pdf it describes s as s = sigma + j * omega (I guess as a complex variable). Any insight into one of these being correct or if I am missing a better common use, that would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Trying to understand what the variable s is for transfer functions (if there is a common accepted use of it). In the problem space I am working in, control theory, I believe I have seen definitions of "short period poles", "complex Laplace transform variable", and at
http://web.mit.edu/2.14/www/Handouts/PoleZero.pdf it describes s as s = sigma + j * omega (I guess as a complex variable). Any insight into one of these being correct or if I am missing a better common use, that would be appreciated.







laplace-transform control-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 12 '18 at 15:44









DannyDanny

12




12












  • $begingroup$
    Check out the Wikipedia Transfer Function page. I don't know what a "short period pole" is, but the other two definitions seem correct to me (even if not providing much insight).
    $endgroup$
    – NickD
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:55










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, I appreciate the second opinion, you'd be surprised how hard it is to google any variation of "transfer function s" since every webpage has an s in it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Danny
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No doubt that $s$ is a complex variable in Laplace transform. Decomposing it into $sigma+jomega$ way is dangerous because it tends to say (what you find in old books) that setting $sigma=0$ you can reach the Fourier Transform. The best way to consider the $s$ in a Laplace Transform is as a purely formal parameter.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:53










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you Jean! Great answer :D
    $endgroup$
    – Danny
    Dec 12 '18 at 21:38


















  • $begingroup$
    Check out the Wikipedia Transfer Function page. I don't know what a "short period pole" is, but the other two definitions seem correct to me (even if not providing much insight).
    $endgroup$
    – NickD
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:55










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, I appreciate the second opinion, you'd be surprised how hard it is to google any variation of "transfer function s" since every webpage has an s in it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Danny
    Dec 12 '18 at 15:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No doubt that $s$ is a complex variable in Laplace transform. Decomposing it into $sigma+jomega$ way is dangerous because it tends to say (what you find in old books) that setting $sigma=0$ you can reach the Fourier Transform. The best way to consider the $s$ in a Laplace Transform is as a purely formal parameter.
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Dec 12 '18 at 19:53










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you Jean! Great answer :D
    $endgroup$
    – Danny
    Dec 12 '18 at 21:38
















$begingroup$
Check out the Wikipedia Transfer Function page. I don't know what a "short period pole" is, but the other two definitions seem correct to me (even if not providing much insight).
$endgroup$
– NickD
Dec 12 '18 at 15:55




$begingroup$
Check out the Wikipedia Transfer Function page. I don't know what a "short period pole" is, but the other two definitions seem correct to me (even if not providing much insight).
$endgroup$
– NickD
Dec 12 '18 at 15:55












$begingroup$
Thanks, I appreciate the second opinion, you'd be surprised how hard it is to google any variation of "transfer function s" since every webpage has an s in it :)
$endgroup$
– Danny
Dec 12 '18 at 15:58




$begingroup$
Thanks, I appreciate the second opinion, you'd be surprised how hard it is to google any variation of "transfer function s" since every webpage has an s in it :)
$endgroup$
– Danny
Dec 12 '18 at 15:58




1




1




$begingroup$
No doubt that $s$ is a complex variable in Laplace transform. Decomposing it into $sigma+jomega$ way is dangerous because it tends to say (what you find in old books) that setting $sigma=0$ you can reach the Fourier Transform. The best way to consider the $s$ in a Laplace Transform is as a purely formal parameter.
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Dec 12 '18 at 19:53




$begingroup$
No doubt that $s$ is a complex variable in Laplace transform. Decomposing it into $sigma+jomega$ way is dangerous because it tends to say (what you find in old books) that setting $sigma=0$ you can reach the Fourier Transform. The best way to consider the $s$ in a Laplace Transform is as a purely formal parameter.
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Dec 12 '18 at 19:53












$begingroup$
Thank you Jean! Great answer :D
$endgroup$
– Danny
Dec 12 '18 at 21:38




$begingroup$
Thank you Jean! Great answer :D
$endgroup$
– Danny
Dec 12 '18 at 21:38










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036841%2ftransfer-function-what-does-s-stand-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036841%2ftransfer-function-what-does-s-stand-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?