Symbolic solution to the infinite sum of $sum_{n=1}^infty{3n[4+(1/n)]^{-n}}$












0












$begingroup$


My professor recently asked to approximate this infinite sum:



$$sum_{n=1}^infty{3n[4+(1/n)]^{-n}}$$



His solution was 1.060000271. And this is what the students should come up with.



But I was asked how this could be solved to an exact value, so I asked my professor and his answer was basically "I don't know".



I simplified this formula to



$$ 3timessum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(4n+1)^n}}$$



But I don't see any further way to simplify that sum.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "But I was asked how this could be solved to an exact value" - You're not being asked to find the infinite sum, you're being asked to approximate it. You could, hypothetically, replace that $infty$ sign with $10,000$ or whatever, i.e. taking the first $10,000$ terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Jan 2 at 4:21










  • $begingroup$
    Ohh, disclosure, I'm one of the tutors in this class. So other students ask me, as they should. And if I can't solve it, I will ask the professor. And if that doesn't work and I ponder a while on the problem, well, now I'm here.
    $endgroup$
    – Johannes Kuhn
    Jan 2 at 4:23












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, I see. And looking at the problem I misread anyhow. My bad. Of course it's also worth keeping in mind that not all sums are able to be evaluated easily: a summation with a similar thing (the index raised to itself): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophomore%27s_dream
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Jan 2 at 4:25










  • $begingroup$
    (Of course that's not to say this doesn't converge or that we can't show the sum converges to some finite value. Just worth keeping in mind that it might not be possible, or, at best, very nontrivial.)
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Jan 2 at 4:26






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    The sum of this series is unlikely to have a closed form expression.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 2 at 4:28
















0












$begingroup$


My professor recently asked to approximate this infinite sum:



$$sum_{n=1}^infty{3n[4+(1/n)]^{-n}}$$



His solution was 1.060000271. And this is what the students should come up with.



But I was asked how this could be solved to an exact value, so I asked my professor and his answer was basically "I don't know".



I simplified this formula to



$$ 3timessum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(4n+1)^n}}$$



But I don't see any further way to simplify that sum.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "But I was asked how this could be solved to an exact value" - You're not being asked to find the infinite sum, you're being asked to approximate it. You could, hypothetically, replace that $infty$ sign with $10,000$ or whatever, i.e. taking the first $10,000$ terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Jan 2 at 4:21










  • $begingroup$
    Ohh, disclosure, I'm one of the tutors in this class. So other students ask me, as they should. And if I can't solve it, I will ask the professor. And if that doesn't work and I ponder a while on the problem, well, now I'm here.
    $endgroup$
    – Johannes Kuhn
    Jan 2 at 4:23












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, I see. And looking at the problem I misread anyhow. My bad. Of course it's also worth keeping in mind that not all sums are able to be evaluated easily: a summation with a similar thing (the index raised to itself): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophomore%27s_dream
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Jan 2 at 4:25










  • $begingroup$
    (Of course that's not to say this doesn't converge or that we can't show the sum converges to some finite value. Just worth keeping in mind that it might not be possible, or, at best, very nontrivial.)
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Jan 2 at 4:26






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    The sum of this series is unlikely to have a closed form expression.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 2 at 4:28














0












0








0





$begingroup$


My professor recently asked to approximate this infinite sum:



$$sum_{n=1}^infty{3n[4+(1/n)]^{-n}}$$



His solution was 1.060000271. And this is what the students should come up with.



But I was asked how this could be solved to an exact value, so I asked my professor and his answer was basically "I don't know".



I simplified this formula to



$$ 3timessum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(4n+1)^n}}$$



But I don't see any further way to simplify that sum.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




My professor recently asked to approximate this infinite sum:



$$sum_{n=1}^infty{3n[4+(1/n)]^{-n}}$$



His solution was 1.060000271. And this is what the students should come up with.



But I was asked how this could be solved to an exact value, so I asked my professor and his answer was basically "I don't know".



I simplified this formula to



$$ 3timessum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(4n+1)^n}}$$



But I don't see any further way to simplify that sum.







sequences-and-series






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 2 at 4:14









Johannes KuhnJohannes Kuhn

1043




1043












  • $begingroup$
    "But I was asked how this could be solved to an exact value" - You're not being asked to find the infinite sum, you're being asked to approximate it. You could, hypothetically, replace that $infty$ sign with $10,000$ or whatever, i.e. taking the first $10,000$ terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Jan 2 at 4:21










  • $begingroup$
    Ohh, disclosure, I'm one of the tutors in this class. So other students ask me, as they should. And if I can't solve it, I will ask the professor. And if that doesn't work and I ponder a while on the problem, well, now I'm here.
    $endgroup$
    – Johannes Kuhn
    Jan 2 at 4:23












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, I see. And looking at the problem I misread anyhow. My bad. Of course it's also worth keeping in mind that not all sums are able to be evaluated easily: a summation with a similar thing (the index raised to itself): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophomore%27s_dream
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Jan 2 at 4:25










  • $begingroup$
    (Of course that's not to say this doesn't converge or that we can't show the sum converges to some finite value. Just worth keeping in mind that it might not be possible, or, at best, very nontrivial.)
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Jan 2 at 4:26






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    The sum of this series is unlikely to have a closed form expression.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 2 at 4:28


















  • $begingroup$
    "But I was asked how this could be solved to an exact value" - You're not being asked to find the infinite sum, you're being asked to approximate it. You could, hypothetically, replace that $infty$ sign with $10,000$ or whatever, i.e. taking the first $10,000$ terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Jan 2 at 4:21










  • $begingroup$
    Ohh, disclosure, I'm one of the tutors in this class. So other students ask me, as they should. And if I can't solve it, I will ask the professor. And if that doesn't work and I ponder a while on the problem, well, now I'm here.
    $endgroup$
    – Johannes Kuhn
    Jan 2 at 4:23












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, I see. And looking at the problem I misread anyhow. My bad. Of course it's also worth keeping in mind that not all sums are able to be evaluated easily: a summation with a similar thing (the index raised to itself): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophomore%27s_dream
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Jan 2 at 4:25










  • $begingroup$
    (Of course that's not to say this doesn't converge or that we can't show the sum converges to some finite value. Just worth keeping in mind that it might not be possible, or, at best, very nontrivial.)
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    Jan 2 at 4:26






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    The sum of this series is unlikely to have a closed form expression.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 2 at 4:28
















$begingroup$
"But I was asked how this could be solved to an exact value" - You're not being asked to find the infinite sum, you're being asked to approximate it. You could, hypothetically, replace that $infty$ sign with $10,000$ or whatever, i.e. taking the first $10,000$ terms.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Jan 2 at 4:21




$begingroup$
"But I was asked how this could be solved to an exact value" - You're not being asked to find the infinite sum, you're being asked to approximate it. You could, hypothetically, replace that $infty$ sign with $10,000$ or whatever, i.e. taking the first $10,000$ terms.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Jan 2 at 4:21












$begingroup$
Ohh, disclosure, I'm one of the tutors in this class. So other students ask me, as they should. And if I can't solve it, I will ask the professor. And if that doesn't work and I ponder a while on the problem, well, now I'm here.
$endgroup$
– Johannes Kuhn
Jan 2 at 4:23






$begingroup$
Ohh, disclosure, I'm one of the tutors in this class. So other students ask me, as they should. And if I can't solve it, I will ask the professor. And if that doesn't work and I ponder a while on the problem, well, now I'm here.
$endgroup$
– Johannes Kuhn
Jan 2 at 4:23














$begingroup$
Oh, I see. And looking at the problem I misread anyhow. My bad. Of course it's also worth keeping in mind that not all sums are able to be evaluated easily: a summation with a similar thing (the index raised to itself): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophomore%27s_dream
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Jan 2 at 4:25




$begingroup$
Oh, I see. And looking at the problem I misread anyhow. My bad. Of course it's also worth keeping in mind that not all sums are able to be evaluated easily: a summation with a similar thing (the index raised to itself): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophomore%27s_dream
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Jan 2 at 4:25












$begingroup$
(Of course that's not to say this doesn't converge or that we can't show the sum converges to some finite value. Just worth keeping in mind that it might not be possible, or, at best, very nontrivial.)
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Jan 2 at 4:26




$begingroup$
(Of course that's not to say this doesn't converge or that we can't show the sum converges to some finite value. Just worth keeping in mind that it might not be possible, or, at best, very nontrivial.)
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Jan 2 at 4:26




5




5




$begingroup$
The sum of this series is unlikely to have a closed form expression.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 2 at 4:28




$begingroup$
The sum of this series is unlikely to have a closed form expression.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 2 at 4:28










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Challenge accepted. The Lagrange-Buhrmann inversion theorem gives



$$-W_0(-x)=sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n-1}}{n!}x^n $$
$$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^n}{n!}x^n = -frac{W_0(-x)}{1+W_0(-x)} $$
$$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+1}}{n!} x^n = -frac{W_0(-x)}{(1+W_0(-x))^3}$$
$$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+2}}{n!} x^n = frac{W_0(-x)(2W_0(-x)-1)}{(1+W_0(-x))^5}$$



for any $x$ such that $|x|<frac{1}{e}$. If we replace $x$ with $z e^{-4z}$ we get that for any $zgeq 0$
$$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+1}}{(n-1)!} z^{n-1} e^{-(4n+1)z} = frac{W_0(-z e^{-4z})left(2W_0(-z e^{-4z})-1right)e^{-z}}{zleft(1+W_0(-z e^{-4z})right)^5} $$
holds, and by integrating both sides over $mathbb{R}^+$ we have
$$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+1}}{(4n+1)^n}=int_{0}^{+infty}frac{W_0(-z e^{-4z})left(2W_0(-z e^{-4z})-1right)e^{-z}}{zleft(1+W_0(-z e^{-4z})right)^5},dz. $$
Now the integrand function in the RHS might appear as a nightmare, but its graph is actually pretty nicely gaussian-shaped, so the numerical evaluation of the RHS is fairly simple through Gaussian quadrature based on Laguerre or Hermite polynomials. Up to six figures the wanted constant is $0.353333$, remarkably close to $frac{1}{3}+frac{1}{50}=frac{53}{150}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    A possible way for an approximation.



    Consider, as you wrote,
    $$sum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}$$ ( where $a>0$) and use a Taylor expansion of the summand around $epsilon=0$. this would give
    $${n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}=n a^{-n}-n a^{-n-1}epsilon+frac{1}{2} (n+1) a^{-n-2}epsilon ^2+Oleft(epsilon ^3right)$$
    Computing the sums
    $$sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n}=frac{a}{(a-1)^2}$$
    $$sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n-1}=frac 1a sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n}=frac{1}{(a-1)^2}$$
    $$sum_{n=1}^infty (n+1) a^{-n-2}=frac 1{a^2}sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n}+frac 1{a^2}sum_{n=1}^infty a^{-n}=frac{2 a-1}{(a-1)^2 a^2}$$ Limited to these terms, we should have
    $$sum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}approxfrac{2 a^3-2 a^2 epsilon +(2 a-1) epsilon ^2}{2 (a-1)^2 a^2}$$
    Using $a=4$ and $epsilon=1$, this would give $frac{103}{288}$ and then, multiplied by $3$, $frac{103}{96}approx 1.07292$.



    We could contiue with the expansion but the problem is that the next term would be
    $$-frac{(n+1) (n+2) a^{-n-3}}{6 n} epsilon ^3$$ the summation of which being more difficult
    $$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(n+1) (n+2) a^{-n-3}}{6 n}=frac{4 a-3-2 (a-1)^2 log left(frac{a-1}{a}right)}{6 (a-1)^2 a^3}$$ making for your case
    $$3sum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}approx frac{103}{96}-frac{13+18 log left(frac{4}{3}right)}{1152}=frac{1223-18 log left(frac{4}{3}right)}{1152}approx 1.05714$$



    We could continue that way but the next term would be
    $$frac{(n+1) (n+2) (n+3) a^{-n-4}}{24 n^2} epsilon ^4$$ the summation of which making appearing the polylogarithm function (don't worry : sooner or later, you will learn about it !).



    So, I shall stop here and conlude that the value of your summation is somewhere between the two numerical values given above. Notice that taking the mean of both, you have $approx 1.06505$



    Edit



    For the specific case $(a=4,epsilon=1)$, I put below the expression of the infinite sum and its numerical representation
    $$left(
    begin{array}{ccc}
    p & text{formula} & text{value} \
    1 & 1 & 1.00000 \
    2 & frac{103}{96} & 1.07292 \
    3 & frac{1223-18 log left(frac{4}{3}right)}{1152} & 1.05714 \
    4 & frac{6530-63 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+18
    text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)}{6144} & 1.06066 \
    5 & frac{391766-4095 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+630
    text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)-216
    text{Li}_3left(frac{1}{4}right)}{368640} & 1.05984 \
    6 & frac{9402433-97515 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+17145
    text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)-2718
    text{Li}_3left(frac{1}{4}right)+1080
    text{Li}_4left(frac{1}{4}right)}{8847360} & 1.06004 \
    7 & frac{87756019-910665 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+157815
    text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)-30240
    text{Li}_3left(frac{1}{4}right)+4788
    text{Li}_4left(frac{1}{4}right)-2160
    text{Li}_5left(frac{1}{4}right)}{82575360} & 1.05999
    end{array}
    right)$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059134%2fsymbolic-solution-to-the-infinite-sum-of-sum-n-1-infty3n41-n-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$

      Challenge accepted. The Lagrange-Buhrmann inversion theorem gives



      $$-W_0(-x)=sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n-1}}{n!}x^n $$
      $$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^n}{n!}x^n = -frac{W_0(-x)}{1+W_0(-x)} $$
      $$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+1}}{n!} x^n = -frac{W_0(-x)}{(1+W_0(-x))^3}$$
      $$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+2}}{n!} x^n = frac{W_0(-x)(2W_0(-x)-1)}{(1+W_0(-x))^5}$$



      for any $x$ such that $|x|<frac{1}{e}$. If we replace $x$ with $z e^{-4z}$ we get that for any $zgeq 0$
      $$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+1}}{(n-1)!} z^{n-1} e^{-(4n+1)z} = frac{W_0(-z e^{-4z})left(2W_0(-z e^{-4z})-1right)e^{-z}}{zleft(1+W_0(-z e^{-4z})right)^5} $$
      holds, and by integrating both sides over $mathbb{R}^+$ we have
      $$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+1}}{(4n+1)^n}=int_{0}^{+infty}frac{W_0(-z e^{-4z})left(2W_0(-z e^{-4z})-1right)e^{-z}}{zleft(1+W_0(-z e^{-4z})right)^5},dz. $$
      Now the integrand function in the RHS might appear as a nightmare, but its graph is actually pretty nicely gaussian-shaped, so the numerical evaluation of the RHS is fairly simple through Gaussian quadrature based on Laguerre or Hermite polynomials. Up to six figures the wanted constant is $0.353333$, remarkably close to $frac{1}{3}+frac{1}{50}=frac{53}{150}$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        3












        $begingroup$

        Challenge accepted. The Lagrange-Buhrmann inversion theorem gives



        $$-W_0(-x)=sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n-1}}{n!}x^n $$
        $$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^n}{n!}x^n = -frac{W_0(-x)}{1+W_0(-x)} $$
        $$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+1}}{n!} x^n = -frac{W_0(-x)}{(1+W_0(-x))^3}$$
        $$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+2}}{n!} x^n = frac{W_0(-x)(2W_0(-x)-1)}{(1+W_0(-x))^5}$$



        for any $x$ such that $|x|<frac{1}{e}$. If we replace $x$ with $z e^{-4z}$ we get that for any $zgeq 0$
        $$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+1}}{(n-1)!} z^{n-1} e^{-(4n+1)z} = frac{W_0(-z e^{-4z})left(2W_0(-z e^{-4z})-1right)e^{-z}}{zleft(1+W_0(-z e^{-4z})right)^5} $$
        holds, and by integrating both sides over $mathbb{R}^+$ we have
        $$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+1}}{(4n+1)^n}=int_{0}^{+infty}frac{W_0(-z e^{-4z})left(2W_0(-z e^{-4z})-1right)e^{-z}}{zleft(1+W_0(-z e^{-4z})right)^5},dz. $$
        Now the integrand function in the RHS might appear as a nightmare, but its graph is actually pretty nicely gaussian-shaped, so the numerical evaluation of the RHS is fairly simple through Gaussian quadrature based on Laguerre or Hermite polynomials. Up to six figures the wanted constant is $0.353333$, remarkably close to $frac{1}{3}+frac{1}{50}=frac{53}{150}$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Challenge accepted. The Lagrange-Buhrmann inversion theorem gives



          $$-W_0(-x)=sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n-1}}{n!}x^n $$
          $$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^n}{n!}x^n = -frac{W_0(-x)}{1+W_0(-x)} $$
          $$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+1}}{n!} x^n = -frac{W_0(-x)}{(1+W_0(-x))^3}$$
          $$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+2}}{n!} x^n = frac{W_0(-x)(2W_0(-x)-1)}{(1+W_0(-x))^5}$$



          for any $x$ such that $|x|<frac{1}{e}$. If we replace $x$ with $z e^{-4z}$ we get that for any $zgeq 0$
          $$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+1}}{(n-1)!} z^{n-1} e^{-(4n+1)z} = frac{W_0(-z e^{-4z})left(2W_0(-z e^{-4z})-1right)e^{-z}}{zleft(1+W_0(-z e^{-4z})right)^5} $$
          holds, and by integrating both sides over $mathbb{R}^+$ we have
          $$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+1}}{(4n+1)^n}=int_{0}^{+infty}frac{W_0(-z e^{-4z})left(2W_0(-z e^{-4z})-1right)e^{-z}}{zleft(1+W_0(-z e^{-4z})right)^5},dz. $$
          Now the integrand function in the RHS might appear as a nightmare, but its graph is actually pretty nicely gaussian-shaped, so the numerical evaluation of the RHS is fairly simple through Gaussian quadrature based on Laguerre or Hermite polynomials. Up to six figures the wanted constant is $0.353333$, remarkably close to $frac{1}{3}+frac{1}{50}=frac{53}{150}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Challenge accepted. The Lagrange-Buhrmann inversion theorem gives



          $$-W_0(-x)=sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n-1}}{n!}x^n $$
          $$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^n}{n!}x^n = -frac{W_0(-x)}{1+W_0(-x)} $$
          $$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+1}}{n!} x^n = -frac{W_0(-x)}{(1+W_0(-x))^3}$$
          $$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+2}}{n!} x^n = frac{W_0(-x)(2W_0(-x)-1)}{(1+W_0(-x))^5}$$



          for any $x$ such that $|x|<frac{1}{e}$. If we replace $x$ with $z e^{-4z}$ we get that for any $zgeq 0$
          $$sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+1}}{(n-1)!} z^{n-1} e^{-(4n+1)z} = frac{W_0(-z e^{-4z})left(2W_0(-z e^{-4z})-1right)e^{-z}}{zleft(1+W_0(-z e^{-4z})right)^5} $$
          holds, and by integrating both sides over $mathbb{R}^+$ we have
          $$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{n^{n+1}}{(4n+1)^n}=int_{0}^{+infty}frac{W_0(-z e^{-4z})left(2W_0(-z e^{-4z})-1right)e^{-z}}{zleft(1+W_0(-z e^{-4z})right)^5},dz. $$
          Now the integrand function in the RHS might appear as a nightmare, but its graph is actually pretty nicely gaussian-shaped, so the numerical evaluation of the RHS is fairly simple through Gaussian quadrature based on Laguerre or Hermite polynomials. Up to six figures the wanted constant is $0.353333$, remarkably close to $frac{1}{3}+frac{1}{50}=frac{53}{150}$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 2 at 6:33









          Jack D'AurizioJack D'Aurizio

          292k33284674




          292k33284674























              1












              $begingroup$

              A possible way for an approximation.



              Consider, as you wrote,
              $$sum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}$$ ( where $a>0$) and use a Taylor expansion of the summand around $epsilon=0$. this would give
              $${n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}=n a^{-n}-n a^{-n-1}epsilon+frac{1}{2} (n+1) a^{-n-2}epsilon ^2+Oleft(epsilon ^3right)$$
              Computing the sums
              $$sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n}=frac{a}{(a-1)^2}$$
              $$sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n-1}=frac 1a sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n}=frac{1}{(a-1)^2}$$
              $$sum_{n=1}^infty (n+1) a^{-n-2}=frac 1{a^2}sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n}+frac 1{a^2}sum_{n=1}^infty a^{-n}=frac{2 a-1}{(a-1)^2 a^2}$$ Limited to these terms, we should have
              $$sum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}approxfrac{2 a^3-2 a^2 epsilon +(2 a-1) epsilon ^2}{2 (a-1)^2 a^2}$$
              Using $a=4$ and $epsilon=1$, this would give $frac{103}{288}$ and then, multiplied by $3$, $frac{103}{96}approx 1.07292$.



              We could contiue with the expansion but the problem is that the next term would be
              $$-frac{(n+1) (n+2) a^{-n-3}}{6 n} epsilon ^3$$ the summation of which being more difficult
              $$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(n+1) (n+2) a^{-n-3}}{6 n}=frac{4 a-3-2 (a-1)^2 log left(frac{a-1}{a}right)}{6 (a-1)^2 a^3}$$ making for your case
              $$3sum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}approx frac{103}{96}-frac{13+18 log left(frac{4}{3}right)}{1152}=frac{1223-18 log left(frac{4}{3}right)}{1152}approx 1.05714$$



              We could continue that way but the next term would be
              $$frac{(n+1) (n+2) (n+3) a^{-n-4}}{24 n^2} epsilon ^4$$ the summation of which making appearing the polylogarithm function (don't worry : sooner or later, you will learn about it !).



              So, I shall stop here and conlude that the value of your summation is somewhere between the two numerical values given above. Notice that taking the mean of both, you have $approx 1.06505$



              Edit



              For the specific case $(a=4,epsilon=1)$, I put below the expression of the infinite sum and its numerical representation
              $$left(
              begin{array}{ccc}
              p & text{formula} & text{value} \
              1 & 1 & 1.00000 \
              2 & frac{103}{96} & 1.07292 \
              3 & frac{1223-18 log left(frac{4}{3}right)}{1152} & 1.05714 \
              4 & frac{6530-63 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+18
              text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)}{6144} & 1.06066 \
              5 & frac{391766-4095 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+630
              text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)-216
              text{Li}_3left(frac{1}{4}right)}{368640} & 1.05984 \
              6 & frac{9402433-97515 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+17145
              text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)-2718
              text{Li}_3left(frac{1}{4}right)+1080
              text{Li}_4left(frac{1}{4}right)}{8847360} & 1.06004 \
              7 & frac{87756019-910665 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+157815
              text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)-30240
              text{Li}_3left(frac{1}{4}right)+4788
              text{Li}_4left(frac{1}{4}right)-2160
              text{Li}_5left(frac{1}{4}right)}{82575360} & 1.05999
              end{array}
              right)$$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                A possible way for an approximation.



                Consider, as you wrote,
                $$sum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}$$ ( where $a>0$) and use a Taylor expansion of the summand around $epsilon=0$. this would give
                $${n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}=n a^{-n}-n a^{-n-1}epsilon+frac{1}{2} (n+1) a^{-n-2}epsilon ^2+Oleft(epsilon ^3right)$$
                Computing the sums
                $$sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n}=frac{a}{(a-1)^2}$$
                $$sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n-1}=frac 1a sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n}=frac{1}{(a-1)^2}$$
                $$sum_{n=1}^infty (n+1) a^{-n-2}=frac 1{a^2}sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n}+frac 1{a^2}sum_{n=1}^infty a^{-n}=frac{2 a-1}{(a-1)^2 a^2}$$ Limited to these terms, we should have
                $$sum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}approxfrac{2 a^3-2 a^2 epsilon +(2 a-1) epsilon ^2}{2 (a-1)^2 a^2}$$
                Using $a=4$ and $epsilon=1$, this would give $frac{103}{288}$ and then, multiplied by $3$, $frac{103}{96}approx 1.07292$.



                We could contiue with the expansion but the problem is that the next term would be
                $$-frac{(n+1) (n+2) a^{-n-3}}{6 n} epsilon ^3$$ the summation of which being more difficult
                $$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(n+1) (n+2) a^{-n-3}}{6 n}=frac{4 a-3-2 (a-1)^2 log left(frac{a-1}{a}right)}{6 (a-1)^2 a^3}$$ making for your case
                $$3sum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}approx frac{103}{96}-frac{13+18 log left(frac{4}{3}right)}{1152}=frac{1223-18 log left(frac{4}{3}right)}{1152}approx 1.05714$$



                We could continue that way but the next term would be
                $$frac{(n+1) (n+2) (n+3) a^{-n-4}}{24 n^2} epsilon ^4$$ the summation of which making appearing the polylogarithm function (don't worry : sooner or later, you will learn about it !).



                So, I shall stop here and conlude that the value of your summation is somewhere between the two numerical values given above. Notice that taking the mean of both, you have $approx 1.06505$



                Edit



                For the specific case $(a=4,epsilon=1)$, I put below the expression of the infinite sum and its numerical representation
                $$left(
                begin{array}{ccc}
                p & text{formula} & text{value} \
                1 & 1 & 1.00000 \
                2 & frac{103}{96} & 1.07292 \
                3 & frac{1223-18 log left(frac{4}{3}right)}{1152} & 1.05714 \
                4 & frac{6530-63 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+18
                text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)}{6144} & 1.06066 \
                5 & frac{391766-4095 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+630
                text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)-216
                text{Li}_3left(frac{1}{4}right)}{368640} & 1.05984 \
                6 & frac{9402433-97515 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+17145
                text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)-2718
                text{Li}_3left(frac{1}{4}right)+1080
                text{Li}_4left(frac{1}{4}right)}{8847360} & 1.06004 \
                7 & frac{87756019-910665 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+157815
                text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)-30240
                text{Li}_3left(frac{1}{4}right)+4788
                text{Li}_4left(frac{1}{4}right)-2160
                text{Li}_5left(frac{1}{4}right)}{82575360} & 1.05999
                end{array}
                right)$$






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  A possible way for an approximation.



                  Consider, as you wrote,
                  $$sum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}$$ ( where $a>0$) and use a Taylor expansion of the summand around $epsilon=0$. this would give
                  $${n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}=n a^{-n}-n a^{-n-1}epsilon+frac{1}{2} (n+1) a^{-n-2}epsilon ^2+Oleft(epsilon ^3right)$$
                  Computing the sums
                  $$sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n}=frac{a}{(a-1)^2}$$
                  $$sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n-1}=frac 1a sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n}=frac{1}{(a-1)^2}$$
                  $$sum_{n=1}^infty (n+1) a^{-n-2}=frac 1{a^2}sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n}+frac 1{a^2}sum_{n=1}^infty a^{-n}=frac{2 a-1}{(a-1)^2 a^2}$$ Limited to these terms, we should have
                  $$sum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}approxfrac{2 a^3-2 a^2 epsilon +(2 a-1) epsilon ^2}{2 (a-1)^2 a^2}$$
                  Using $a=4$ and $epsilon=1$, this would give $frac{103}{288}$ and then, multiplied by $3$, $frac{103}{96}approx 1.07292$.



                  We could contiue with the expansion but the problem is that the next term would be
                  $$-frac{(n+1) (n+2) a^{-n-3}}{6 n} epsilon ^3$$ the summation of which being more difficult
                  $$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(n+1) (n+2) a^{-n-3}}{6 n}=frac{4 a-3-2 (a-1)^2 log left(frac{a-1}{a}right)}{6 (a-1)^2 a^3}$$ making for your case
                  $$3sum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}approx frac{103}{96}-frac{13+18 log left(frac{4}{3}right)}{1152}=frac{1223-18 log left(frac{4}{3}right)}{1152}approx 1.05714$$



                  We could continue that way but the next term would be
                  $$frac{(n+1) (n+2) (n+3) a^{-n-4}}{24 n^2} epsilon ^4$$ the summation of which making appearing the polylogarithm function (don't worry : sooner or later, you will learn about it !).



                  So, I shall stop here and conlude that the value of your summation is somewhere between the two numerical values given above. Notice that taking the mean of both, you have $approx 1.06505$



                  Edit



                  For the specific case $(a=4,epsilon=1)$, I put below the expression of the infinite sum and its numerical representation
                  $$left(
                  begin{array}{ccc}
                  p & text{formula} & text{value} \
                  1 & 1 & 1.00000 \
                  2 & frac{103}{96} & 1.07292 \
                  3 & frac{1223-18 log left(frac{4}{3}right)}{1152} & 1.05714 \
                  4 & frac{6530-63 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+18
                  text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)}{6144} & 1.06066 \
                  5 & frac{391766-4095 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+630
                  text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)-216
                  text{Li}_3left(frac{1}{4}right)}{368640} & 1.05984 \
                  6 & frac{9402433-97515 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+17145
                  text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)-2718
                  text{Li}_3left(frac{1}{4}right)+1080
                  text{Li}_4left(frac{1}{4}right)}{8847360} & 1.06004 \
                  7 & frac{87756019-910665 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+157815
                  text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)-30240
                  text{Li}_3left(frac{1}{4}right)+4788
                  text{Li}_4left(frac{1}{4}right)-2160
                  text{Li}_5left(frac{1}{4}right)}{82575360} & 1.05999
                  end{array}
                  right)$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  A possible way for an approximation.



                  Consider, as you wrote,
                  $$sum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}$$ ( where $a>0$) and use a Taylor expansion of the summand around $epsilon=0$. this would give
                  $${n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}=n a^{-n}-n a^{-n-1}epsilon+frac{1}{2} (n+1) a^{-n-2}epsilon ^2+Oleft(epsilon ^3right)$$
                  Computing the sums
                  $$sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n}=frac{a}{(a-1)^2}$$
                  $$sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n-1}=frac 1a sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n}=frac{1}{(a-1)^2}$$
                  $$sum_{n=1}^infty (n+1) a^{-n-2}=frac 1{a^2}sum_{n=1}^infty n a^{-n}+frac 1{a^2}sum_{n=1}^infty a^{-n}=frac{2 a-1}{(a-1)^2 a^2}$$ Limited to these terms, we should have
                  $$sum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}approxfrac{2 a^3-2 a^2 epsilon +(2 a-1) epsilon ^2}{2 (a-1)^2 a^2}$$
                  Using $a=4$ and $epsilon=1$, this would give $frac{103}{288}$ and then, multiplied by $3$, $frac{103}{96}approx 1.07292$.



                  We could contiue with the expansion but the problem is that the next term would be
                  $$-frac{(n+1) (n+2) a^{-n-3}}{6 n} epsilon ^3$$ the summation of which being more difficult
                  $$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(n+1) (n+2) a^{-n-3}}{6 n}=frac{4 a-3-2 (a-1)^2 log left(frac{a-1}{a}right)}{6 (a-1)^2 a^3}$$ making for your case
                  $$3sum_{n=1}^infty{n^{n+1}over{(an+epsilon)^n}}approx frac{103}{96}-frac{13+18 log left(frac{4}{3}right)}{1152}=frac{1223-18 log left(frac{4}{3}right)}{1152}approx 1.05714$$



                  We could continue that way but the next term would be
                  $$frac{(n+1) (n+2) (n+3) a^{-n-4}}{24 n^2} epsilon ^4$$ the summation of which making appearing the polylogarithm function (don't worry : sooner or later, you will learn about it !).



                  So, I shall stop here and conlude that the value of your summation is somewhere between the two numerical values given above. Notice that taking the mean of both, you have $approx 1.06505$



                  Edit



                  For the specific case $(a=4,epsilon=1)$, I put below the expression of the infinite sum and its numerical representation
                  $$left(
                  begin{array}{ccc}
                  p & text{formula} & text{value} \
                  1 & 1 & 1.00000 \
                  2 & frac{103}{96} & 1.07292 \
                  3 & frac{1223-18 log left(frac{4}{3}right)}{1152} & 1.05714 \
                  4 & frac{6530-63 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+18
                  text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)}{6144} & 1.06066 \
                  5 & frac{391766-4095 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+630
                  text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)-216
                  text{Li}_3left(frac{1}{4}right)}{368640} & 1.05984 \
                  6 & frac{9402433-97515 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+17145
                  text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)-2718
                  text{Li}_3left(frac{1}{4}right)+1080
                  text{Li}_4left(frac{1}{4}right)}{8847360} & 1.06004 \
                  7 & frac{87756019-910665 log left(frac{4}{3}right)+157815
                  text{Li}_2left(frac{1}{4}right)-30240
                  text{Li}_3left(frac{1}{4}right)+4788
                  text{Li}_4left(frac{1}{4}right)-2160
                  text{Li}_5left(frac{1}{4}right)}{82575360} & 1.05999
                  end{array}
                  right)$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 9 at 11:00

























                  answered Jan 2 at 7:17









                  Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici

                  126k1158134




                  126k1158134






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059134%2fsymbolic-solution-to-the-infinite-sum-of-sum-n-1-infty3n41-n-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                      ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                      Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?