Find the final tableau knowing the optimal solution












1












$begingroup$



Consider the following linear program $$displaystyle max z=5x_1+2x_2+3x_3\ s.t. x_1+5x_2+2x_3le b_1\ x_1-5x_2-6x_3le b_2 \
x_1,x_1,x_3ge0$$



If the optimal solution is reached at $x_1=30,x_5=10,$ write directly the complete optimal tableau, whitout executing the simplex method. And then find the values of $b_1$ and $b_2$.




Attempt



The optimal tableau should have the following structure



begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & & & & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & 1 & & ? & & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & & & & 1 & 10 \
end{array}



I don't know how to calculate what is inside the tableau. How will I calculate $B^{-1}$? Please help me.



I know the last simplex tableau in matrix form is this



begin{array}{|r r|r}
c_BB^{-1}N-c & c_BB^{-1} & c_BB^{-1}b \ hline
B^{-1}N & B^{-1} & B^{-1}b
end{array}










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Write the tableau first, then apply dual simplex. You may find a MathJax template for simplex tableau on Mathematics Meta.
    $endgroup$
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Nov 11 '18 at 19:57










  • $begingroup$
    @GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 thanks for the hint! I'll work on it.
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Nov 14 '18 at 0:31










  • $begingroup$
    @GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 but in the exercise its write directly the complete optimal tableau. With this I understand that no need to apply dual simplex is needed. am I wrong?
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 3:25










  • $begingroup$
    Thx for your update to the question. When I posted my comment, the optimal tableau wasn't there.
    $endgroup$
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Jan 14 at 12:58










  • $begingroup$
    @GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 :) nop It wasn't but the statement was already there.
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 17 at 4:34
















1












$begingroup$



Consider the following linear program $$displaystyle max z=5x_1+2x_2+3x_3\ s.t. x_1+5x_2+2x_3le b_1\ x_1-5x_2-6x_3le b_2 \
x_1,x_1,x_3ge0$$



If the optimal solution is reached at $x_1=30,x_5=10,$ write directly the complete optimal tableau, whitout executing the simplex method. And then find the values of $b_1$ and $b_2$.




Attempt



The optimal tableau should have the following structure



begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & & & & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & 1 & & ? & & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & & & & 1 & 10 \
end{array}



I don't know how to calculate what is inside the tableau. How will I calculate $B^{-1}$? Please help me.



I know the last simplex tableau in matrix form is this



begin{array}{|r r|r}
c_BB^{-1}N-c & c_BB^{-1} & c_BB^{-1}b \ hline
B^{-1}N & B^{-1} & B^{-1}b
end{array}










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Write the tableau first, then apply dual simplex. You may find a MathJax template for simplex tableau on Mathematics Meta.
    $endgroup$
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Nov 11 '18 at 19:57










  • $begingroup$
    @GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 thanks for the hint! I'll work on it.
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Nov 14 '18 at 0:31










  • $begingroup$
    @GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 but in the exercise its write directly the complete optimal tableau. With this I understand that no need to apply dual simplex is needed. am I wrong?
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 3:25










  • $begingroup$
    Thx for your update to the question. When I posted my comment, the optimal tableau wasn't there.
    $endgroup$
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Jan 14 at 12:58










  • $begingroup$
    @GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 :) nop It wasn't but the statement was already there.
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 17 at 4:34














1












1








1





$begingroup$



Consider the following linear program $$displaystyle max z=5x_1+2x_2+3x_3\ s.t. x_1+5x_2+2x_3le b_1\ x_1-5x_2-6x_3le b_2 \
x_1,x_1,x_3ge0$$



If the optimal solution is reached at $x_1=30,x_5=10,$ write directly the complete optimal tableau, whitout executing the simplex method. And then find the values of $b_1$ and $b_2$.




Attempt



The optimal tableau should have the following structure



begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & & & & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & 1 & & ? & & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & & & & 1 & 10 \
end{array}



I don't know how to calculate what is inside the tableau. How will I calculate $B^{-1}$? Please help me.



I know the last simplex tableau in matrix form is this



begin{array}{|r r|r}
c_BB^{-1}N-c & c_BB^{-1} & c_BB^{-1}b \ hline
B^{-1}N & B^{-1} & B^{-1}b
end{array}










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Consider the following linear program $$displaystyle max z=5x_1+2x_2+3x_3\ s.t. x_1+5x_2+2x_3le b_1\ x_1-5x_2-6x_3le b_2 \
x_1,x_1,x_3ge0$$



If the optimal solution is reached at $x_1=30,x_5=10,$ write directly the complete optimal tableau, whitout executing the simplex method. And then find the values of $b_1$ and $b_2$.




Attempt



The optimal tableau should have the following structure



begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & & & & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & 1 & & ? & & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & & & & 1 & 10 \
end{array}



I don't know how to calculate what is inside the tableau. How will I calculate $B^{-1}$? Please help me.



I know the last simplex tableau in matrix form is this



begin{array}{|r r|r}
c_BB^{-1}N-c & c_BB^{-1} & c_BB^{-1}b \ hline
B^{-1}N & B^{-1} & B^{-1}b
end{array}







proof-verification optimization linear-programming operations-research






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 14 at 12:53









GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會

14.2k82652




14.2k82652










asked Nov 6 '18 at 1:05









Al t.Al t.

3901523




3901523








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Write the tableau first, then apply dual simplex. You may find a MathJax template for simplex tableau on Mathematics Meta.
    $endgroup$
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Nov 11 '18 at 19:57










  • $begingroup$
    @GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 thanks for the hint! I'll work on it.
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Nov 14 '18 at 0:31










  • $begingroup$
    @GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 but in the exercise its write directly the complete optimal tableau. With this I understand that no need to apply dual simplex is needed. am I wrong?
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 3:25










  • $begingroup$
    Thx for your update to the question. When I posted my comment, the optimal tableau wasn't there.
    $endgroup$
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Jan 14 at 12:58










  • $begingroup$
    @GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 :) nop It wasn't but the statement was already there.
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 17 at 4:34














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Write the tableau first, then apply dual simplex. You may find a MathJax template for simplex tableau on Mathematics Meta.
    $endgroup$
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Nov 11 '18 at 19:57










  • $begingroup$
    @GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 thanks for the hint! I'll work on it.
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Nov 14 '18 at 0:31










  • $begingroup$
    @GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 but in the exercise its write directly the complete optimal tableau. With this I understand that no need to apply dual simplex is needed. am I wrong?
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 3:25










  • $begingroup$
    Thx for your update to the question. When I posted my comment, the optimal tableau wasn't there.
    $endgroup$
    – GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
    Jan 14 at 12:58










  • $begingroup$
    @GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 :) nop It wasn't but the statement was already there.
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 17 at 4:34








2




2




$begingroup$
Write the tableau first, then apply dual simplex. You may find a MathJax template for simplex tableau on Mathematics Meta.
$endgroup$
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 11 '18 at 19:57




$begingroup$
Write the tableau first, then apply dual simplex. You may find a MathJax template for simplex tableau on Mathematics Meta.
$endgroup$
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Nov 11 '18 at 19:57












$begingroup$
@GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 thanks for the hint! I'll work on it.
$endgroup$
– Al t.
Nov 14 '18 at 0:31




$begingroup$
@GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 thanks for the hint! I'll work on it.
$endgroup$
– Al t.
Nov 14 '18 at 0:31












$begingroup$
@GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 but in the exercise its write directly the complete optimal tableau. With this I understand that no need to apply dual simplex is needed. am I wrong?
$endgroup$
– Al t.
Jan 2 at 3:25




$begingroup$
@GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 but in the exercise its write directly the complete optimal tableau. With this I understand that no need to apply dual simplex is needed. am I wrong?
$endgroup$
– Al t.
Jan 2 at 3:25












$begingroup$
Thx for your update to the question. When I posted my comment, the optimal tableau wasn't there.
$endgroup$
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Jan 14 at 12:58




$begingroup$
Thx for your update to the question. When I posted my comment, the optimal tableau wasn't there.
$endgroup$
– GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
Jan 14 at 12:58












$begingroup$
@GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 :) nop It wasn't but the statement was already there.
$endgroup$
– Al t.
Jan 17 at 4:34




$begingroup$
@GNUSupporter8964民主女神地下教會 :) nop It wasn't but the statement was already there.
$endgroup$
– Al t.
Jan 17 at 4:34










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

From the given optimal solution $z(x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4,x_5)=z(30,0,0,0,10)=150$, you can find:
$$x_1+5x_2+2x_3+x_4=b_1=color{red}{30},\ x_1-5x_2-6x_3+x_5=b_2=color{red}{40},
$$

where $x_4$ and $x_5$ are the slack variables.



Since in the optimal table only the slack variable $x_4$ is replaced with $x_1$, then the intersection of $x_4$ row and $x_1$ column was the pivot element, which corresponds to the original value $1$. Hence the row remained from the initial table:
$$begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & & & & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & boxed 1 & color{red}5 & color{red}2 & color{red}1 & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & & & & 1 & 10 \
end{array}$$

In order to get $0$ as the first element in the row $z=5x_1+2x_2+3x_3$, where the first element was $-5$ initially, pivot row must have been multiplied by $5$ and added to it:
$$begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & color{red}{23} & color{red}7 & color{red}5 & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & boxed 1 & color{red}5 & color{red}2 & color{red}1 & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & & & & 1 & 10 \
end{array}
$$

In order to get $0$ as the first element in the row $x_5$, where the first element was $1$ initially, pivot row must have been multiplied by $-1$ and added to it:
$$begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & color{red}{23} & color{red}7 & color{red}5 & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & boxed 1 & color{red}5 & color{red}2 & color{red}1 & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & color{red}{-10} & color{red}{-8} & color{red}{-1} & 1 & 10 \
end{array}
$$

Note: I am not sure if this is ejecuting (executing). But it is reverse engineering (backwards working).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much ^^
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    btw what do you mean with your note?
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    It was stated "without ejecuting simplex table", so I’m not sure if my solution is executing or not. Anyway the optimal table must have the found numbers. Good luck.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Jan 2 at 18:35










  • $begingroup$
    Definitely it's not ejecuting the simplex method.
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 18:44














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2986579%2ffind-the-final-tableau-knowing-the-optimal-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

From the given optimal solution $z(x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4,x_5)=z(30,0,0,0,10)=150$, you can find:
$$x_1+5x_2+2x_3+x_4=b_1=color{red}{30},\ x_1-5x_2-6x_3+x_5=b_2=color{red}{40},
$$

where $x_4$ and $x_5$ are the slack variables.



Since in the optimal table only the slack variable $x_4$ is replaced with $x_1$, then the intersection of $x_4$ row and $x_1$ column was the pivot element, which corresponds to the original value $1$. Hence the row remained from the initial table:
$$begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & & & & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & boxed 1 & color{red}5 & color{red}2 & color{red}1 & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & & & & 1 & 10 \
end{array}$$

In order to get $0$ as the first element in the row $z=5x_1+2x_2+3x_3$, where the first element was $-5$ initially, pivot row must have been multiplied by $5$ and added to it:
$$begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & color{red}{23} & color{red}7 & color{red}5 & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & boxed 1 & color{red}5 & color{red}2 & color{red}1 & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & & & & 1 & 10 \
end{array}
$$

In order to get $0$ as the first element in the row $x_5$, where the first element was $1$ initially, pivot row must have been multiplied by $-1$ and added to it:
$$begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & color{red}{23} & color{red}7 & color{red}5 & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & boxed 1 & color{red}5 & color{red}2 & color{red}1 & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & color{red}{-10} & color{red}{-8} & color{red}{-1} & 1 & 10 \
end{array}
$$

Note: I am not sure if this is ejecuting (executing). But it is reverse engineering (backwards working).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much ^^
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    btw what do you mean with your note?
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    It was stated "without ejecuting simplex table", so I’m not sure if my solution is executing or not. Anyway the optimal table must have the found numbers. Good luck.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Jan 2 at 18:35










  • $begingroup$
    Definitely it's not ejecuting the simplex method.
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 18:44


















2












$begingroup$

From the given optimal solution $z(x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4,x_5)=z(30,0,0,0,10)=150$, you can find:
$$x_1+5x_2+2x_3+x_4=b_1=color{red}{30},\ x_1-5x_2-6x_3+x_5=b_2=color{red}{40},
$$

where $x_4$ and $x_5$ are the slack variables.



Since in the optimal table only the slack variable $x_4$ is replaced with $x_1$, then the intersection of $x_4$ row and $x_1$ column was the pivot element, which corresponds to the original value $1$. Hence the row remained from the initial table:
$$begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & & & & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & boxed 1 & color{red}5 & color{red}2 & color{red}1 & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & & & & 1 & 10 \
end{array}$$

In order to get $0$ as the first element in the row $z=5x_1+2x_2+3x_3$, where the first element was $-5$ initially, pivot row must have been multiplied by $5$ and added to it:
$$begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & color{red}{23} & color{red}7 & color{red}5 & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & boxed 1 & color{red}5 & color{red}2 & color{red}1 & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & & & & 1 & 10 \
end{array}
$$

In order to get $0$ as the first element in the row $x_5$, where the first element was $1$ initially, pivot row must have been multiplied by $-1$ and added to it:
$$begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & color{red}{23} & color{red}7 & color{red}5 & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & boxed 1 & color{red}5 & color{red}2 & color{red}1 & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & color{red}{-10} & color{red}{-8} & color{red}{-1} & 1 & 10 \
end{array}
$$

Note: I am not sure if this is ejecuting (executing). But it is reverse engineering (backwards working).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much ^^
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    btw what do you mean with your note?
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    It was stated "without ejecuting simplex table", so I’m not sure if my solution is executing or not. Anyway the optimal table must have the found numbers. Good luck.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Jan 2 at 18:35










  • $begingroup$
    Definitely it's not ejecuting the simplex method.
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 18:44
















2












2








2





$begingroup$

From the given optimal solution $z(x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4,x_5)=z(30,0,0,0,10)=150$, you can find:
$$x_1+5x_2+2x_3+x_4=b_1=color{red}{30},\ x_1-5x_2-6x_3+x_5=b_2=color{red}{40},
$$

where $x_4$ and $x_5$ are the slack variables.



Since in the optimal table only the slack variable $x_4$ is replaced with $x_1$, then the intersection of $x_4$ row and $x_1$ column was the pivot element, which corresponds to the original value $1$. Hence the row remained from the initial table:
$$begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & & & & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & boxed 1 & color{red}5 & color{red}2 & color{red}1 & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & & & & 1 & 10 \
end{array}$$

In order to get $0$ as the first element in the row $z=5x_1+2x_2+3x_3$, where the first element was $-5$ initially, pivot row must have been multiplied by $5$ and added to it:
$$begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & color{red}{23} & color{red}7 & color{red}5 & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & boxed 1 & color{red}5 & color{red}2 & color{red}1 & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & & & & 1 & 10 \
end{array}
$$

In order to get $0$ as the first element in the row $x_5$, where the first element was $1$ initially, pivot row must have been multiplied by $-1$ and added to it:
$$begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & color{red}{23} & color{red}7 & color{red}5 & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & boxed 1 & color{red}5 & color{red}2 & color{red}1 & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & color{red}{-10} & color{red}{-8} & color{red}{-1} & 1 & 10 \
end{array}
$$

Note: I am not sure if this is ejecuting (executing). But it is reverse engineering (backwards working).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



From the given optimal solution $z(x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4,x_5)=z(30,0,0,0,10)=150$, you can find:
$$x_1+5x_2+2x_3+x_4=b_1=color{red}{30},\ x_1-5x_2-6x_3+x_5=b_2=color{red}{40},
$$

where $x_4$ and $x_5$ are the slack variables.



Since in the optimal table only the slack variable $x_4$ is replaced with $x_1$, then the intersection of $x_4$ row and $x_1$ column was the pivot element, which corresponds to the original value $1$. Hence the row remained from the initial table:
$$begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & & & & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & boxed 1 & color{red}5 & color{red}2 & color{red}1 & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & & & & 1 & 10 \
end{array}$$

In order to get $0$ as the first element in the row $z=5x_1+2x_2+3x_3$, where the first element was $-5$ initially, pivot row must have been multiplied by $5$ and added to it:
$$begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & color{red}{23} & color{red}7 & color{red}5 & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & boxed 1 & color{red}5 & color{red}2 & color{red}1 & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & & & & 1 & 10 \
end{array}
$$

In order to get $0$ as the first element in the row $x_5$, where the first element was $1$ initially, pivot row must have been multiplied by $-1$ and added to it:
$$begin{array}{r|rrrrr|r}
& x_1 & x_2 & x_3 & x_4 & x_5 & \ hline
z & 0 & color{red}{23} & color{red}7 & color{red}5 & 0 & 150 \ hline
x_1 & boxed 1 & color{red}5 & color{red}2 & color{red}1 & 0 & 30 \
x_5 & 0 & color{red}{-10} & color{red}{-8} & color{red}{-1} & 1 & 10 \
end{array}
$$

Note: I am not sure if this is ejecuting (executing). But it is reverse engineering (backwards working).







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 2 at 10:00









farruhotafarruhota

22.5k2942




22.5k2942












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much ^^
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    btw what do you mean with your note?
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    It was stated "without ejecuting simplex table", so I’m not sure if my solution is executing or not. Anyway the optimal table must have the found numbers. Good luck.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Jan 2 at 18:35










  • $begingroup$
    Definitely it's not ejecuting the simplex method.
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 18:44




















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much ^^
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    btw what do you mean with your note?
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    It was stated "without ejecuting simplex table", so I’m not sure if my solution is executing or not. Anyway the optimal table must have the found numbers. Good luck.
    $endgroup$
    – farruhota
    Jan 2 at 18:35










  • $begingroup$
    Definitely it's not ejecuting the simplex method.
    $endgroup$
    – Al t.
    Jan 2 at 18:44


















$begingroup$
Thank you so much ^^
$endgroup$
– Al t.
Jan 2 at 18:26




$begingroup$
Thank you so much ^^
$endgroup$
– Al t.
Jan 2 at 18:26












$begingroup$
btw what do you mean with your note?
$endgroup$
– Al t.
Jan 2 at 18:26




$begingroup$
btw what do you mean with your note?
$endgroup$
– Al t.
Jan 2 at 18:26












$begingroup$
It was stated "without ejecuting simplex table", so I’m not sure if my solution is executing or not. Anyway the optimal table must have the found numbers. Good luck.
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Jan 2 at 18:35




$begingroup$
It was stated "without ejecuting simplex table", so I’m not sure if my solution is executing or not. Anyway the optimal table must have the found numbers. Good luck.
$endgroup$
– farruhota
Jan 2 at 18:35












$begingroup$
Definitely it's not ejecuting the simplex method.
$endgroup$
– Al t.
Jan 2 at 18:44






$begingroup$
Definitely it's not ejecuting the simplex method.
$endgroup$
– Al t.
Jan 2 at 18:44




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2986579%2ffind-the-final-tableau-knowing-the-optimal-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?