Notation in Category Theory, related to total categories, colimit$_{xin C, z in P(x)} x$












2












$begingroup$


A definition says:




Call a category C total if the Yoneda embedding has a left adjoint
$F:$ PShv(C) $ to $ C.




If $P in$ PShv(C), then $F(P) cong$ colimit$_{xin C, z in P(x)} x$.



Moreover, a category C is total if this colimit exists.



What is this symbol colimit$_{xin C, z in P(x)} x$? Why is there this isomorphism, and why is C total if this colimit exists?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    A definition says:




    Call a category C total if the Yoneda embedding has a left adjoint
    $F:$ PShv(C) $ to $ C.




    If $P in$ PShv(C), then $F(P) cong$ colimit$_{xin C, z in P(x)} x$.



    Moreover, a category C is total if this colimit exists.



    What is this symbol colimit$_{xin C, z in P(x)} x$? Why is there this isomorphism, and why is C total if this colimit exists?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$


      A definition says:




      Call a category C total if the Yoneda embedding has a left adjoint
      $F:$ PShv(C) $ to $ C.




      If $P in$ PShv(C), then $F(P) cong$ colimit$_{xin C, z in P(x)} x$.



      Moreover, a category C is total if this colimit exists.



      What is this symbol colimit$_{xin C, z in P(x)} x$? Why is there this isomorphism, and why is C total if this colimit exists?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      A definition says:




      Call a category C total if the Yoneda embedding has a left adjoint
      $F:$ PShv(C) $ to $ C.




      If $P in$ PShv(C), then $F(P) cong$ colimit$_{xin C, z in P(x)} x$.



      Moreover, a category C is total if this colimit exists.



      What is this symbol colimit$_{xin C, z in P(x)} x$? Why is there this isomorphism, and why is C total if this colimit exists?







      category-theory notation






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 28 '18 at 19:48







      Mariah

















      asked Dec 28 '18 at 18:17









      MariahMariah

      2,1471718




      2,1471718






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          The colimit is really indexed by the category of elements $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, whose objects are pairs $(x,z)$ with $x in mathrm{ob}(mathcal{C})$ and $z in P(x)$, and where a morphism $f : (x,z) to (x', z')$ is a morphism $f : x to x'$ in $mathcal{C}$ such that $P(f)(z') = z$.



          Every presheaf $P$ is a colimit of representables indexed by $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, namely
          $$P cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ mathsf{y}(x)$$
          in $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$, where $mathsf{y} : mathcal{C} to mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$ is the Yoneda embedding.



          Since $F$ is a left adjoint, it preserves colimits, meaning that
          $$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x)$$



          Since the Yoneda embedding is full and faithful, the counit $varepsilon : F circ mathsf{y} to mathrm{id}_{mathcal{C}}$ of the adjunction $F dashv mathsf{y}$ is a natural isomorphism, and so we obtain
          $$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$$



          You now need to verify that if this colimit exists for all presheaves $P$, then the assignment $P mapsto mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$ determines a functor $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C}) to mathcal{C}$ which is left adjoint to the Yoneda embedding.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055160%2fnotation-in-category-theory-related-to-total-categories-colimit-x-in-c-z-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            The colimit is really indexed by the category of elements $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, whose objects are pairs $(x,z)$ with $x in mathrm{ob}(mathcal{C})$ and $z in P(x)$, and where a morphism $f : (x,z) to (x', z')$ is a morphism $f : x to x'$ in $mathcal{C}$ such that $P(f)(z') = z$.



            Every presheaf $P$ is a colimit of representables indexed by $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, namely
            $$P cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ mathsf{y}(x)$$
            in $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$, where $mathsf{y} : mathcal{C} to mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$ is the Yoneda embedding.



            Since $F$ is a left adjoint, it preserves colimits, meaning that
            $$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x)$$



            Since the Yoneda embedding is full and faithful, the counit $varepsilon : F circ mathsf{y} to mathrm{id}_{mathcal{C}}$ of the adjunction $F dashv mathsf{y}$ is a natural isomorphism, and so we obtain
            $$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$$



            You now need to verify that if this colimit exists for all presheaves $P$, then the assignment $P mapsto mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$ determines a functor $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C}) to mathcal{C}$ which is left adjoint to the Yoneda embedding.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              4












              $begingroup$

              The colimit is really indexed by the category of elements $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, whose objects are pairs $(x,z)$ with $x in mathrm{ob}(mathcal{C})$ and $z in P(x)$, and where a morphism $f : (x,z) to (x', z')$ is a morphism $f : x to x'$ in $mathcal{C}$ such that $P(f)(z') = z$.



              Every presheaf $P$ is a colimit of representables indexed by $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, namely
              $$P cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ mathsf{y}(x)$$
              in $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$, where $mathsf{y} : mathcal{C} to mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$ is the Yoneda embedding.



              Since $F$ is a left adjoint, it preserves colimits, meaning that
              $$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x)$$



              Since the Yoneda embedding is full and faithful, the counit $varepsilon : F circ mathsf{y} to mathrm{id}_{mathcal{C}}$ of the adjunction $F dashv mathsf{y}$ is a natural isomorphism, and so we obtain
              $$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$$



              You now need to verify that if this colimit exists for all presheaves $P$, then the assignment $P mapsto mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$ determines a functor $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C}) to mathcal{C}$ which is left adjoint to the Yoneda embedding.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                4












                4








                4





                $begingroup$

                The colimit is really indexed by the category of elements $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, whose objects are pairs $(x,z)$ with $x in mathrm{ob}(mathcal{C})$ and $z in P(x)$, and where a morphism $f : (x,z) to (x', z')$ is a morphism $f : x to x'$ in $mathcal{C}$ such that $P(f)(z') = z$.



                Every presheaf $P$ is a colimit of representables indexed by $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, namely
                $$P cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ mathsf{y}(x)$$
                in $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$, where $mathsf{y} : mathcal{C} to mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$ is the Yoneda embedding.



                Since $F$ is a left adjoint, it preserves colimits, meaning that
                $$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x)$$



                Since the Yoneda embedding is full and faithful, the counit $varepsilon : F circ mathsf{y} to mathrm{id}_{mathcal{C}}$ of the adjunction $F dashv mathsf{y}$ is a natural isomorphism, and so we obtain
                $$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$$



                You now need to verify that if this colimit exists for all presheaves $P$, then the assignment $P mapsto mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$ determines a functor $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C}) to mathcal{C}$ which is left adjoint to the Yoneda embedding.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The colimit is really indexed by the category of elements $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, whose objects are pairs $(x,z)$ with $x in mathrm{ob}(mathcal{C})$ and $z in P(x)$, and where a morphism $f : (x,z) to (x', z')$ is a morphism $f : x to x'$ in $mathcal{C}$ such that $P(f)(z') = z$.



                Every presheaf $P$ is a colimit of representables indexed by $int_{mathcal{C}} P$, namely
                $$P cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ mathsf{y}(x)$$
                in $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$, where $mathsf{y} : mathcal{C} to mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C})$ is the Yoneda embedding.



                Since $F$ is a left adjoint, it preserves colimits, meaning that
                $$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x)$$



                Since the Yoneda embedding is full and faithful, the counit $varepsilon : F circ mathsf{y} to mathrm{id}_{mathcal{C}}$ of the adjunction $F dashv mathsf{y}$ is a natural isomorphism, and so we obtain
                $$F(P) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ Fmathsf{y}(x) cong mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$$



                You now need to verify that if this colimit exists for all presheaves $P$, then the assignment $P mapsto mathrm{colim}_{(x,z) in int P} ~ x$ determines a functor $mathrm{Psh}(mathcal{C}) to mathcal{C}$ which is left adjoint to the Yoneda embedding.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 28 '18 at 19:59









                Clive NewsteadClive Newstead

                52.1k474137




                52.1k474137






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055160%2fnotation-in-category-theory-related-to-total-categories-colimit-x-in-c-z-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                    ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                    Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?