Equivalent characterization of Eulerian circuits












1












$begingroup$


Background



A connected graph has an Eulerian circuit if every vertex has even degree.



I am thinking about a certain classification of connected graphs where, for a connected graph $G$, every cut splits (intersects) an even number of edges.



For example, while the following graph does not have an Eulerian circuit, the displayed cut 'splits an even number of edges':



Graph cut




Claim: A connected graph $G$ has an Eulerian circuit iff every cut of $G$ splits an even number of edges.




Proof attempt:



($rightarrow$) If $G$ has an Eulerian circuit then ... ?



($leftarrow$) Suppose every cut splits an even number of edges. Then we can make a cut around each individual vertex that will split an even number of edges. Hence the degree of each vertex is even. Therefore $G$ has an Eulerian circuit.



I'm lost in the forwards direction of the proof. Any hint would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Background



    A connected graph has an Eulerian circuit if every vertex has even degree.



    I am thinking about a certain classification of connected graphs where, for a connected graph $G$, every cut splits (intersects) an even number of edges.



    For example, while the following graph does not have an Eulerian circuit, the displayed cut 'splits an even number of edges':



    Graph cut




    Claim: A connected graph $G$ has an Eulerian circuit iff every cut of $G$ splits an even number of edges.




    Proof attempt:



    ($rightarrow$) If $G$ has an Eulerian circuit then ... ?



    ($leftarrow$) Suppose every cut splits an even number of edges. Then we can make a cut around each individual vertex that will split an even number of edges. Hence the degree of each vertex is even. Therefore $G$ has an Eulerian circuit.



    I'm lost in the forwards direction of the proof. Any hint would be appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Background



      A connected graph has an Eulerian circuit if every vertex has even degree.



      I am thinking about a certain classification of connected graphs where, for a connected graph $G$, every cut splits (intersects) an even number of edges.



      For example, while the following graph does not have an Eulerian circuit, the displayed cut 'splits an even number of edges':



      Graph cut




      Claim: A connected graph $G$ has an Eulerian circuit iff every cut of $G$ splits an even number of edges.




      Proof attempt:



      ($rightarrow$) If $G$ has an Eulerian circuit then ... ?



      ($leftarrow$) Suppose every cut splits an even number of edges. Then we can make a cut around each individual vertex that will split an even number of edges. Hence the degree of each vertex is even. Therefore $G$ has an Eulerian circuit.



      I'm lost in the forwards direction of the proof. Any hint would be appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Background



      A connected graph has an Eulerian circuit if every vertex has even degree.



      I am thinking about a certain classification of connected graphs where, for a connected graph $G$, every cut splits (intersects) an even number of edges.



      For example, while the following graph does not have an Eulerian circuit, the displayed cut 'splits an even number of edges':



      Graph cut




      Claim: A connected graph $G$ has an Eulerian circuit iff every cut of $G$ splits an even number of edges.




      Proof attempt:



      ($rightarrow$) If $G$ has an Eulerian circuit then ... ?



      ($leftarrow$) Suppose every cut splits an even number of edges. Then we can make a cut around each individual vertex that will split an even number of edges. Hence the degree of each vertex is even. Therefore $G$ has an Eulerian circuit.



      I'm lost in the forwards direction of the proof. Any hint would be appreciated.







      combinatorics graph-theory eulerian-path






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 29 '18 at 0:33







      T. Fo

















      asked Dec 28 '18 at 20:55









      T. FoT. Fo

      496311




      496311






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Given any cut and any Eulerian circuit, the circuit has to cross from one side of the cut to another an even number of times, since it starts and ends on the same side of the cut.



          Since the Eulerian circuit takes each edge once, the number of edges split by the cut is even.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            Given: $forall v in V: textrm{deg}(v) equiv 0 pmod 2$. Partition $V$ into $S$ and $T$. We desire to show that the number of edges split by the cut is even.



            By induction on the size of $T$.



            Base case: when $|T| = 0$, there are $0$ edges split by the cut, which is even.



            Inductive step: if it holds for all $|T| = n$, transfer vertex $u$ from $S$ to $T$. Since $u$ has an even number of edges in total, its edges to $S$ and its edges to $T$ have the same parity, so adding the edges $u-S$ to the cut and removing the edges $s-T$ from the cut doesn't change the parity of the number of edges split by the cut.



            QED.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$














              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055272%2fequivalent-characterization-of-eulerian-circuits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3












              $begingroup$

              Given any cut and any Eulerian circuit, the circuit has to cross from one side of the cut to another an even number of times, since it starts and ends on the same side of the cut.



              Since the Eulerian circuit takes each edge once, the number of edges split by the cut is even.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                3












                $begingroup$

                Given any cut and any Eulerian circuit, the circuit has to cross from one side of the cut to another an even number of times, since it starts and ends on the same side of the cut.



                Since the Eulerian circuit takes each edge once, the number of edges split by the cut is even.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  Given any cut and any Eulerian circuit, the circuit has to cross from one side of the cut to another an even number of times, since it starts and ends on the same side of the cut.



                  Since the Eulerian circuit takes each edge once, the number of edges split by the cut is even.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Given any cut and any Eulerian circuit, the circuit has to cross from one side of the cut to another an even number of times, since it starts and ends on the same side of the cut.



                  Since the Eulerian circuit takes each edge once, the number of edges split by the cut is even.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 28 '18 at 23:04









                  Misha LavrovMisha Lavrov

                  49.6k759109




                  49.6k759109























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      Given: $forall v in V: textrm{deg}(v) equiv 0 pmod 2$. Partition $V$ into $S$ and $T$. We desire to show that the number of edges split by the cut is even.



                      By induction on the size of $T$.



                      Base case: when $|T| = 0$, there are $0$ edges split by the cut, which is even.



                      Inductive step: if it holds for all $|T| = n$, transfer vertex $u$ from $S$ to $T$. Since $u$ has an even number of edges in total, its edges to $S$ and its edges to $T$ have the same parity, so adding the edges $u-S$ to the cut and removing the edges $s-T$ from the cut doesn't change the parity of the number of edges split by the cut.



                      QED.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Given: $forall v in V: textrm{deg}(v) equiv 0 pmod 2$. Partition $V$ into $S$ and $T$. We desire to show that the number of edges split by the cut is even.



                        By induction on the size of $T$.



                        Base case: when $|T| = 0$, there are $0$ edges split by the cut, which is even.



                        Inductive step: if it holds for all $|T| = n$, transfer vertex $u$ from $S$ to $T$. Since $u$ has an even number of edges in total, its edges to $S$ and its edges to $T$ have the same parity, so adding the edges $u-S$ to the cut and removing the edges $s-T$ from the cut doesn't change the parity of the number of edges split by the cut.



                        QED.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          Given: $forall v in V: textrm{deg}(v) equiv 0 pmod 2$. Partition $V$ into $S$ and $T$. We desire to show that the number of edges split by the cut is even.



                          By induction on the size of $T$.



                          Base case: when $|T| = 0$, there are $0$ edges split by the cut, which is even.



                          Inductive step: if it holds for all $|T| = n$, transfer vertex $u$ from $S$ to $T$. Since $u$ has an even number of edges in total, its edges to $S$ and its edges to $T$ have the same parity, so adding the edges $u-S$ to the cut and removing the edges $s-T$ from the cut doesn't change the parity of the number of edges split by the cut.



                          QED.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Given: $forall v in V: textrm{deg}(v) equiv 0 pmod 2$. Partition $V$ into $S$ and $T$. We desire to show that the number of edges split by the cut is even.



                          By induction on the size of $T$.



                          Base case: when $|T| = 0$, there are $0$ edges split by the cut, which is even.



                          Inductive step: if it holds for all $|T| = n$, transfer vertex $u$ from $S$ to $T$. Since $u$ has an even number of edges in total, its edges to $S$ and its edges to $T$ have the same parity, so adding the edges $u-S$ to the cut and removing the edges $s-T$ from the cut doesn't change the parity of the number of edges split by the cut.



                          QED.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Dec 28 '18 at 21:25









                          Peter TaylorPeter Taylor

                          9,20712343




                          9,20712343






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055272%2fequivalent-characterization-of-eulerian-circuits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                              ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                              Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?