how to get two align point with split equations












0















I have this equation:



begin{equation}
begin{split}
alpha &= frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} = 2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s]\
beta &= pi r^2 = 0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma &= frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)} = 0.1814 [m] \
delta &= frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2} = 1.0472
end{split}
end{equation}


and would like to add a second align point on the second '=' symbol. Is there a way to do that?



Thank










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Welcome to TeX.SE! Can you please complete your given code snippet to be compilable? Then we do not have to guess what you are doing and we can see, if you use math related packages like amsmath etc.

    – Kurt
    Mar 29 at 2:55











  • Split only supports a single & per line. Use aligned instead, or alignat/alignedat as mentioned below. I tend to always use aligned in situations like this, and will only switch to split when I need the specific features it provides.

    – daleif
    Mar 29 at 10:23











  • Sorry, it was my first post, I will write all the code on the next one.

    – Leonardo Garberoglio
    Mar 30 at 3:15
















0















I have this equation:



begin{equation}
begin{split}
alpha &= frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} = 2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s]\
beta &= pi r^2 = 0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma &= frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)} = 0.1814 [m] \
delta &= frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2} = 1.0472
end{split}
end{equation}


and would like to add a second align point on the second '=' symbol. Is there a way to do that?



Thank










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Welcome to TeX.SE! Can you please complete your given code snippet to be compilable? Then we do not have to guess what you are doing and we can see, if you use math related packages like amsmath etc.

    – Kurt
    Mar 29 at 2:55











  • Split only supports a single & per line. Use aligned instead, or alignat/alignedat as mentioned below. I tend to always use aligned in situations like this, and will only switch to split when I need the specific features it provides.

    – daleif
    Mar 29 at 10:23











  • Sorry, it was my first post, I will write all the code on the next one.

    – Leonardo Garberoglio
    Mar 30 at 3:15














0












0








0








I have this equation:



begin{equation}
begin{split}
alpha &= frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} = 2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s]\
beta &= pi r^2 = 0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma &= frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)} = 0.1814 [m] \
delta &= frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2} = 1.0472
end{split}
end{equation}


and would like to add a second align point on the second '=' symbol. Is there a way to do that?



Thank










share|improve this question
















I have this equation:



begin{equation}
begin{split}
alpha &= frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} = 2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s]\
beta &= pi r^2 = 0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma &= frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)} = 0.1814 [m] \
delta &= frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2} = 1.0472
end{split}
end{equation}


and would like to add a second align point on the second '=' symbol. Is there a way to do that?



Thank







align split






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 29 at 9:51









Bernard

175k778208




175k778208










asked Mar 29 at 2:41









Leonardo GarberoglioLeonardo Garberoglio

31




31








  • 1





    Welcome to TeX.SE! Can you please complete your given code snippet to be compilable? Then we do not have to guess what you are doing and we can see, if you use math related packages like amsmath etc.

    – Kurt
    Mar 29 at 2:55











  • Split only supports a single & per line. Use aligned instead, or alignat/alignedat as mentioned below. I tend to always use aligned in situations like this, and will only switch to split when I need the specific features it provides.

    – daleif
    Mar 29 at 10:23











  • Sorry, it was my first post, I will write all the code on the next one.

    – Leonardo Garberoglio
    Mar 30 at 3:15














  • 1





    Welcome to TeX.SE! Can you please complete your given code snippet to be compilable? Then we do not have to guess what you are doing and we can see, if you use math related packages like amsmath etc.

    – Kurt
    Mar 29 at 2:55











  • Split only supports a single & per line. Use aligned instead, or alignat/alignedat as mentioned below. I tend to always use aligned in situations like this, and will only switch to split when I need the specific features it provides.

    – daleif
    Mar 29 at 10:23











  • Sorry, it was my first post, I will write all the code on the next one.

    – Leonardo Garberoglio
    Mar 30 at 3:15








1




1





Welcome to TeX.SE! Can you please complete your given code snippet to be compilable? Then we do not have to guess what you are doing and we can see, if you use math related packages like amsmath etc.

– Kurt
Mar 29 at 2:55





Welcome to TeX.SE! Can you please complete your given code snippet to be compilable? Then we do not have to guess what you are doing and we can see, if you use math related packages like amsmath etc.

– Kurt
Mar 29 at 2:55













Split only supports a single & per line. Use aligned instead, or alignat/alignedat as mentioned below. I tend to always use aligned in situations like this, and will only switch to split when I need the specific features it provides.

– daleif
Mar 29 at 10:23





Split only supports a single & per line. Use aligned instead, or alignat/alignedat as mentioned below. I tend to always use aligned in situations like this, and will only switch to split when I need the specific features it provides.

– daleif
Mar 29 at 10:23













Sorry, it was my first post, I will write all the code on the next one.

– Leonardo Garberoglio
Mar 30 at 3:15





Sorry, it was my first post, I will write all the code on the next one.

– Leonardo Garberoglio
Mar 30 at 3:15










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














You can use alignat for this:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

begin{alignat*}{2}
alpha&=frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} &&=2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s]\
beta&=pi r^2&&=0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma&=frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)}&&=0.1814 [m]\
delta&=frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2}&&=1.0472
end{alignat*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    tan should use a backslash to be typeset upright.

    – Bernard
    Mar 29 at 9:52



















2














There are multiple questions on the same topic. I am taking the answer of Werner from the question Multiple alignment



Multiple alignment points with no gap between expressions is obtained using the alignat environment from amsmath.



With that, the code changes to:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{split}
alpha &= frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} = 2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s]\
beta &= pi r^2 = 0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma &= frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)} = 0.1814 [m] \
delta &= frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2} = 1.0472
end{split}
end{equation}


begin{alignat}{2}
alpha &= frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} &&= 2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s] notag\
beta &= pi r^2 &&= 0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma &= frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)} &&= 0.1814 [m] notag\
delta &= frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2} &&= 1.0472 notag
end{alignat}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Why to use {3} in begin{alignat}{3}? I reckon {2} alignments should be also fine.

    – Majid Abdolshah
    Mar 29 at 3:50











  • @MajidAbdolshah - Yes you are right. I have updated the answer.

    – subham soni
    Mar 29 at 4:17












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482032%2fhow-to-get-two-align-point-with-split-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














You can use alignat for this:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

begin{alignat*}{2}
alpha&=frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} &&=2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s]\
beta&=pi r^2&&=0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma&=frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)}&&=0.1814 [m]\
delta&=frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2}&&=1.0472
end{alignat*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    tan should use a backslash to be typeset upright.

    – Bernard
    Mar 29 at 9:52
















2














You can use alignat for this:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

begin{alignat*}{2}
alpha&=frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} &&=2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s]\
beta&=pi r^2&&=0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma&=frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)}&&=0.1814 [m]\
delta&=frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2}&&=1.0472
end{alignat*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    tan should use a backslash to be typeset upright.

    – Bernard
    Mar 29 at 9:52














2












2








2







You can use alignat for this:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

begin{alignat*}{2}
alpha&=frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} &&=2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s]\
beta&=pi r^2&&=0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma&=frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)}&&=0.1814 [m]\
delta&=frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2}&&=1.0472
end{alignat*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer















You can use alignat for this:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

begin{alignat*}{2}
alpha&=frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} &&=2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s]\
beta&=pi r^2&&=0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma&=frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)}&&=0.1814 [m]\
delta&=frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2}&&=1.0472
end{alignat*}

end{document}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 29 at 3:47

























answered Mar 29 at 3:30









Majid AbdolshahMajid Abdolshah

71828




71828








  • 1





    tan should use a backslash to be typeset upright.

    – Bernard
    Mar 29 at 9:52














  • 1





    tan should use a backslash to be typeset upright.

    – Bernard
    Mar 29 at 9:52








1




1





tan should use a backslash to be typeset upright.

– Bernard
Mar 29 at 9:52





tan should use a backslash to be typeset upright.

– Bernard
Mar 29 at 9:52











2














There are multiple questions on the same topic. I am taking the answer of Werner from the question Multiple alignment



Multiple alignment points with no gap between expressions is obtained using the alignat environment from amsmath.



With that, the code changes to:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{split}
alpha &= frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} = 2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s]\
beta &= pi r^2 = 0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma &= frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)} = 0.1814 [m] \
delta &= frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2} = 1.0472
end{split}
end{equation}


begin{alignat}{2}
alpha &= frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} &&= 2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s] notag\
beta &= pi r^2 &&= 0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma &= frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)} &&= 0.1814 [m] notag\
delta &= frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2} &&= 1.0472 notag
end{alignat}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Why to use {3} in begin{alignat}{3}? I reckon {2} alignments should be also fine.

    – Majid Abdolshah
    Mar 29 at 3:50











  • @MajidAbdolshah - Yes you are right. I have updated the answer.

    – subham soni
    Mar 29 at 4:17
















2














There are multiple questions on the same topic. I am taking the answer of Werner from the question Multiple alignment



Multiple alignment points with no gap between expressions is obtained using the alignat environment from amsmath.



With that, the code changes to:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{split}
alpha &= frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} = 2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s]\
beta &= pi r^2 = 0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma &= frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)} = 0.1814 [m] \
delta &= frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2} = 1.0472
end{split}
end{equation}


begin{alignat}{2}
alpha &= frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} &&= 2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s] notag\
beta &= pi r^2 &&= 0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma &= frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)} &&= 0.1814 [m] notag\
delta &= frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2} &&= 1.0472 notag
end{alignat}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Why to use {3} in begin{alignat}{3}? I reckon {2} alignments should be also fine.

    – Majid Abdolshah
    Mar 29 at 3:50











  • @MajidAbdolshah - Yes you are right. I have updated the answer.

    – subham soni
    Mar 29 at 4:17














2












2








2







There are multiple questions on the same topic. I am taking the answer of Werner from the question Multiple alignment



Multiple alignment points with no gap between expressions is obtained using the alignat environment from amsmath.



With that, the code changes to:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{split}
alpha &= frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} = 2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s]\
beta &= pi r^2 = 0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma &= frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)} = 0.1814 [m] \
delta &= frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2} = 1.0472
end{split}
end{equation}


begin{alignat}{2}
alpha &= frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} &&= 2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s] notag\
beta &= pi r^2 &&= 0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma &= frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)} &&= 0.1814 [m] notag\
delta &= frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2} &&= 1.0472 notag
end{alignat}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer















There are multiple questions on the same topic. I am taking the answer of Werner from the question Multiple alignment



Multiple alignment points with no gap between expressions is obtained using the alignat environment from amsmath.



With that, the code changes to:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation}
begin{split}
alpha &= frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} = 2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s]\
beta &= pi r^2 = 0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma &= frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)} = 0.1814 [m] \
delta &= frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2} = 1.0472
end{split}
end{equation}


begin{alignat}{2}
alpha &= frac{1}{100} S sqrt{2g} &&= 2.2444e^{-05} [m^frac52/s] notag\
beta &= pi r^2 &&= 0.0079 [m^2]\
gamma &= frac{2 pi r}{tan(theta)} &&= 0.1814 [m] notag\
delta &= frac{pi}{(tan(theta))^2} &&= 1.0472 notag
end{alignat}

end{document}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 29 at 4:16

























answered Mar 29 at 3:32









subham sonisubham soni

4,93183187




4,93183187













  • Why to use {3} in begin{alignat}{3}? I reckon {2} alignments should be also fine.

    – Majid Abdolshah
    Mar 29 at 3:50











  • @MajidAbdolshah - Yes you are right. I have updated the answer.

    – subham soni
    Mar 29 at 4:17



















  • Why to use {3} in begin{alignat}{3}? I reckon {2} alignments should be also fine.

    – Majid Abdolshah
    Mar 29 at 3:50











  • @MajidAbdolshah - Yes you are right. I have updated the answer.

    – subham soni
    Mar 29 at 4:17

















Why to use {3} in begin{alignat}{3}? I reckon {2} alignments should be also fine.

– Majid Abdolshah
Mar 29 at 3:50





Why to use {3} in begin{alignat}{3}? I reckon {2} alignments should be also fine.

– Majid Abdolshah
Mar 29 at 3:50













@MajidAbdolshah - Yes you are right. I have updated the answer.

– subham soni
Mar 29 at 4:17





@MajidAbdolshah - Yes you are right. I have updated the answer.

– subham soni
Mar 29 at 4:17


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482032%2fhow-to-get-two-align-point-with-split-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?