Upper bound for the number of solutions of a Diophantine equation












4












$begingroup$


Consider the Diophantine equation



$$k^2 + k - sigma (ell^2 + ell) = m,$$
where $N leq k leq 2 N$, $L leq ell leq 2 L$, $m in mathbb{Z}$ and $sigma in mathbb{R}$.



For which values of the parameter $sigma$ is it possible to say that
the number of solutions of this equation is bounded by $O(min(N, L)^{epsilon})$ ?



To facilitate progress, I'm going to put this auxiliar lemma.



$underline {Lemma}$. For every $varepsilon > 0$, there exists $C_{varepsilon} > 0$
such that, for every $m in mathbb{Z}$ and $K$ positive integer,



$$sharp {(x, y) in mathbb{N}^{2} mid K leq x leq 2 K , x^{2} pm y^{2} = m } leq C_{varepsilon} K^{varepsilon}. $$



I would be very grateful for any suggestion!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 11




    $begingroup$
    The lemma is false. Suppose that $m=0$. Then every pair $(x,x)$ with $Kleq xleq 2K$ belongs to the set on the LHS. Hence, this set contains $K+1$ elements and so its cardinality cannot be bounded from above by $C_{epsilon} K^{epsilon}$ for $epsilon<1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp Lampe
    Mar 14 at 14:22








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The lemma is in fact true. Note that you can take a large constant C > 0 in this case.
    $endgroup$
    – Marcelo Nogueira
    Mar 14 at 14:31






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @MarceloNogueira: for what value of $C_{1/2}$ is $C_{1/2}K^{1/2}>K+1$ for all $K$?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex B.
    Mar 14 at 17:38
















4












$begingroup$


Consider the Diophantine equation



$$k^2 + k - sigma (ell^2 + ell) = m,$$
where $N leq k leq 2 N$, $L leq ell leq 2 L$, $m in mathbb{Z}$ and $sigma in mathbb{R}$.



For which values of the parameter $sigma$ is it possible to say that
the number of solutions of this equation is bounded by $O(min(N, L)^{epsilon})$ ?



To facilitate progress, I'm going to put this auxiliar lemma.



$underline {Lemma}$. For every $varepsilon > 0$, there exists $C_{varepsilon} > 0$
such that, for every $m in mathbb{Z}$ and $K$ positive integer,



$$sharp {(x, y) in mathbb{N}^{2} mid K leq x leq 2 K , x^{2} pm y^{2} = m } leq C_{varepsilon} K^{varepsilon}. $$



I would be very grateful for any suggestion!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 11




    $begingroup$
    The lemma is false. Suppose that $m=0$. Then every pair $(x,x)$ with $Kleq xleq 2K$ belongs to the set on the LHS. Hence, this set contains $K+1$ elements and so its cardinality cannot be bounded from above by $C_{epsilon} K^{epsilon}$ for $epsilon<1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp Lampe
    Mar 14 at 14:22








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The lemma is in fact true. Note that you can take a large constant C > 0 in this case.
    $endgroup$
    – Marcelo Nogueira
    Mar 14 at 14:31






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @MarceloNogueira: for what value of $C_{1/2}$ is $C_{1/2}K^{1/2}>K+1$ for all $K$?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex B.
    Mar 14 at 17:38














4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


Consider the Diophantine equation



$$k^2 + k - sigma (ell^2 + ell) = m,$$
where $N leq k leq 2 N$, $L leq ell leq 2 L$, $m in mathbb{Z}$ and $sigma in mathbb{R}$.



For which values of the parameter $sigma$ is it possible to say that
the number of solutions of this equation is bounded by $O(min(N, L)^{epsilon})$ ?



To facilitate progress, I'm going to put this auxiliar lemma.



$underline {Lemma}$. For every $varepsilon > 0$, there exists $C_{varepsilon} > 0$
such that, for every $m in mathbb{Z}$ and $K$ positive integer,



$$sharp {(x, y) in mathbb{N}^{2} mid K leq x leq 2 K , x^{2} pm y^{2} = m } leq C_{varepsilon} K^{varepsilon}. $$



I would be very grateful for any suggestion!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Consider the Diophantine equation



$$k^2 + k - sigma (ell^2 + ell) = m,$$
where $N leq k leq 2 N$, $L leq ell leq 2 L$, $m in mathbb{Z}$ and $sigma in mathbb{R}$.



For which values of the parameter $sigma$ is it possible to say that
the number of solutions of this equation is bounded by $O(min(N, L)^{epsilon})$ ?



To facilitate progress, I'm going to put this auxiliar lemma.



$underline {Lemma}$. For every $varepsilon > 0$, there exists $C_{varepsilon} > 0$
such that, for every $m in mathbb{Z}$ and $K$ positive integer,



$$sharp {(x, y) in mathbb{N}^{2} mid K leq x leq 2 K , x^{2} pm y^{2} = m } leq C_{varepsilon} K^{varepsilon}. $$



I would be very grateful for any suggestion!







nt.number-theory diophantine-equations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 14 at 21:04









András Bátkai

3,81642342




3,81642342










asked Mar 14 at 14:06









Marcelo NogueiraMarcelo Nogueira

505




505








  • 11




    $begingroup$
    The lemma is false. Suppose that $m=0$. Then every pair $(x,x)$ with $Kleq xleq 2K$ belongs to the set on the LHS. Hence, this set contains $K+1$ elements and so its cardinality cannot be bounded from above by $C_{epsilon} K^{epsilon}$ for $epsilon<1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp Lampe
    Mar 14 at 14:22








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The lemma is in fact true. Note that you can take a large constant C > 0 in this case.
    $endgroup$
    – Marcelo Nogueira
    Mar 14 at 14:31






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @MarceloNogueira: for what value of $C_{1/2}$ is $C_{1/2}K^{1/2}>K+1$ for all $K$?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex B.
    Mar 14 at 17:38














  • 11




    $begingroup$
    The lemma is false. Suppose that $m=0$. Then every pair $(x,x)$ with $Kleq xleq 2K$ belongs to the set on the LHS. Hence, this set contains $K+1$ elements and so its cardinality cannot be bounded from above by $C_{epsilon} K^{epsilon}$ for $epsilon<1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Philipp Lampe
    Mar 14 at 14:22








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The lemma is in fact true. Note that you can take a large constant C > 0 in this case.
    $endgroup$
    – Marcelo Nogueira
    Mar 14 at 14:31






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @MarceloNogueira: for what value of $C_{1/2}$ is $C_{1/2}K^{1/2}>K+1$ for all $K$?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex B.
    Mar 14 at 17:38








11




11




$begingroup$
The lemma is false. Suppose that $m=0$. Then every pair $(x,x)$ with $Kleq xleq 2K$ belongs to the set on the LHS. Hence, this set contains $K+1$ elements and so its cardinality cannot be bounded from above by $C_{epsilon} K^{epsilon}$ for $epsilon<1$.
$endgroup$
– Philipp Lampe
Mar 14 at 14:22






$begingroup$
The lemma is false. Suppose that $m=0$. Then every pair $(x,x)$ with $Kleq xleq 2K$ belongs to the set on the LHS. Hence, this set contains $K+1$ elements and so its cardinality cannot be bounded from above by $C_{epsilon} K^{epsilon}$ for $epsilon<1$.
$endgroup$
– Philipp Lampe
Mar 14 at 14:22






1




1




$begingroup$
The lemma is in fact true. Note that you can take a large constant C > 0 in this case.
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
Mar 14 at 14:31




$begingroup$
The lemma is in fact true. Note that you can take a large constant C > 0 in this case.
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
Mar 14 at 14:31




4




4




$begingroup$
@MarceloNogueira: for what value of $C_{1/2}$ is $C_{1/2}K^{1/2}>K+1$ for all $K$?
$endgroup$
– Alex B.
Mar 14 at 17:38




$begingroup$
@MarceloNogueira: for what value of $C_{1/2}$ is $C_{1/2}K^{1/2}>K+1$ for all $K$?
$endgroup$
– Alex B.
Mar 14 at 17:38










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

First of all, you can assume $sigmain mathbb{Q}$. Otherwise, the only solutions there can be are those with $l^2+l=0$ and $k^2+k=m$, and there's certainly only a bounded number of those.



Multiplying by the denominator, we see that we are being asked for a bound on the number of solutions to
$$a (k^2 + k) + b (l^2 + l) = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. We multiply both sides by $4$ and add $a+b$ to complete the squares. Thus we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$a k^2 + b l^2 = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. Multiplying by $a$ and then replacing $a k$ by $k$, we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$k^2 + d l^2 = n$$
for given $d$ and $n$,
with $k$ and $l$ in dyadic intervals $K<kleq 2 K$, $L<lleq 2 L$.
(I take the implied constant in the bound you wish is allowed to depend on $sigma$. The bound I will give will depend on $d$, though not on $n$.)



For $d>0$, the number of solutions is obviously bounded by the number of ideals of norm $n$ in the ring of integers of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$. That number is bounded by the number of divisors of $n$, which is $O_epsilon(n^epsilon) = O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$. To obtain the bound $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$, note that, if $L^2 < 2K/3d$, there can be at most one solutions to your equation, as two consecutive values of $k^2$ differ by at least $2 K + 1$, and $d (2 L)^2 - d L^2 = 3 d L^2$.



For $d<0$, you also have to take quadratic units in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$, but, as there is only a logarithmic number of them in a box of given size (the group of units being isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}$ times bounded torsion), you still get a bound of $O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$, and hence of $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$.



The only exception is given by $n=0$ and $d$ of the form $-r^2$, $r$ an integer. Then the number of solutions to $k^2+d l^2 = n$ is evidently infinite, and the number of solutions in a box is linear on the size of the box. It is easy to see that this is the case of $c=-(a+ b)/4$, $a b=-r^2$ in the equation $a (k^2+k) + b (l^2+ l) = c$. That case corresponds to $sigmain mathbb{Q}^2$, $m = (sigma-1)/4$ (and thus $sigmain mathbb{Z}^2$) in the original problem.



tl;dr a simple exercise in quadratic number fields






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
    $endgroup$
    – Marcelo Nogueira
    Mar 14 at 18:27













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325448%2fupper-bound-for-the-number-of-solutions-of-a-diophantine-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









10












$begingroup$

First of all, you can assume $sigmain mathbb{Q}$. Otherwise, the only solutions there can be are those with $l^2+l=0$ and $k^2+k=m$, and there's certainly only a bounded number of those.



Multiplying by the denominator, we see that we are being asked for a bound on the number of solutions to
$$a (k^2 + k) + b (l^2 + l) = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. We multiply both sides by $4$ and add $a+b$ to complete the squares. Thus we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$a k^2 + b l^2 = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. Multiplying by $a$ and then replacing $a k$ by $k$, we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$k^2 + d l^2 = n$$
for given $d$ and $n$,
with $k$ and $l$ in dyadic intervals $K<kleq 2 K$, $L<lleq 2 L$.
(I take the implied constant in the bound you wish is allowed to depend on $sigma$. The bound I will give will depend on $d$, though not on $n$.)



For $d>0$, the number of solutions is obviously bounded by the number of ideals of norm $n$ in the ring of integers of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$. That number is bounded by the number of divisors of $n$, which is $O_epsilon(n^epsilon) = O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$. To obtain the bound $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$, note that, if $L^2 < 2K/3d$, there can be at most one solutions to your equation, as two consecutive values of $k^2$ differ by at least $2 K + 1$, and $d (2 L)^2 - d L^2 = 3 d L^2$.



For $d<0$, you also have to take quadratic units in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$, but, as there is only a logarithmic number of them in a box of given size (the group of units being isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}$ times bounded torsion), you still get a bound of $O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$, and hence of $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$.



The only exception is given by $n=0$ and $d$ of the form $-r^2$, $r$ an integer. Then the number of solutions to $k^2+d l^2 = n$ is evidently infinite, and the number of solutions in a box is linear on the size of the box. It is easy to see that this is the case of $c=-(a+ b)/4$, $a b=-r^2$ in the equation $a (k^2+k) + b (l^2+ l) = c$. That case corresponds to $sigmain mathbb{Q}^2$, $m = (sigma-1)/4$ (and thus $sigmain mathbb{Z}^2$) in the original problem.



tl;dr a simple exercise in quadratic number fields






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
    $endgroup$
    – Marcelo Nogueira
    Mar 14 at 18:27


















10












$begingroup$

First of all, you can assume $sigmain mathbb{Q}$. Otherwise, the only solutions there can be are those with $l^2+l=0$ and $k^2+k=m$, and there's certainly only a bounded number of those.



Multiplying by the denominator, we see that we are being asked for a bound on the number of solutions to
$$a (k^2 + k) + b (l^2 + l) = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. We multiply both sides by $4$ and add $a+b$ to complete the squares. Thus we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$a k^2 + b l^2 = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. Multiplying by $a$ and then replacing $a k$ by $k$, we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$k^2 + d l^2 = n$$
for given $d$ and $n$,
with $k$ and $l$ in dyadic intervals $K<kleq 2 K$, $L<lleq 2 L$.
(I take the implied constant in the bound you wish is allowed to depend on $sigma$. The bound I will give will depend on $d$, though not on $n$.)



For $d>0$, the number of solutions is obviously bounded by the number of ideals of norm $n$ in the ring of integers of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$. That number is bounded by the number of divisors of $n$, which is $O_epsilon(n^epsilon) = O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$. To obtain the bound $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$, note that, if $L^2 < 2K/3d$, there can be at most one solutions to your equation, as two consecutive values of $k^2$ differ by at least $2 K + 1$, and $d (2 L)^2 - d L^2 = 3 d L^2$.



For $d<0$, you also have to take quadratic units in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$, but, as there is only a logarithmic number of them in a box of given size (the group of units being isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}$ times bounded torsion), you still get a bound of $O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$, and hence of $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$.



The only exception is given by $n=0$ and $d$ of the form $-r^2$, $r$ an integer. Then the number of solutions to $k^2+d l^2 = n$ is evidently infinite, and the number of solutions in a box is linear on the size of the box. It is easy to see that this is the case of $c=-(a+ b)/4$, $a b=-r^2$ in the equation $a (k^2+k) + b (l^2+ l) = c$. That case corresponds to $sigmain mathbb{Q}^2$, $m = (sigma-1)/4$ (and thus $sigmain mathbb{Z}^2$) in the original problem.



tl;dr a simple exercise in quadratic number fields






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
    $endgroup$
    – Marcelo Nogueira
    Mar 14 at 18:27
















10












10








10





$begingroup$

First of all, you can assume $sigmain mathbb{Q}$. Otherwise, the only solutions there can be are those with $l^2+l=0$ and $k^2+k=m$, and there's certainly only a bounded number of those.



Multiplying by the denominator, we see that we are being asked for a bound on the number of solutions to
$$a (k^2 + k) + b (l^2 + l) = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. We multiply both sides by $4$ and add $a+b$ to complete the squares. Thus we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$a k^2 + b l^2 = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. Multiplying by $a$ and then replacing $a k$ by $k$, we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$k^2 + d l^2 = n$$
for given $d$ and $n$,
with $k$ and $l$ in dyadic intervals $K<kleq 2 K$, $L<lleq 2 L$.
(I take the implied constant in the bound you wish is allowed to depend on $sigma$. The bound I will give will depend on $d$, though not on $n$.)



For $d>0$, the number of solutions is obviously bounded by the number of ideals of norm $n$ in the ring of integers of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$. That number is bounded by the number of divisors of $n$, which is $O_epsilon(n^epsilon) = O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$. To obtain the bound $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$, note that, if $L^2 < 2K/3d$, there can be at most one solutions to your equation, as two consecutive values of $k^2$ differ by at least $2 K + 1$, and $d (2 L)^2 - d L^2 = 3 d L^2$.



For $d<0$, you also have to take quadratic units in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$, but, as there is only a logarithmic number of them in a box of given size (the group of units being isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}$ times bounded torsion), you still get a bound of $O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$, and hence of $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$.



The only exception is given by $n=0$ and $d$ of the form $-r^2$, $r$ an integer. Then the number of solutions to $k^2+d l^2 = n$ is evidently infinite, and the number of solutions in a box is linear on the size of the box. It is easy to see that this is the case of $c=-(a+ b)/4$, $a b=-r^2$ in the equation $a (k^2+k) + b (l^2+ l) = c$. That case corresponds to $sigmain mathbb{Q}^2$, $m = (sigma-1)/4$ (and thus $sigmain mathbb{Z}^2$) in the original problem.



tl;dr a simple exercise in quadratic number fields






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



First of all, you can assume $sigmain mathbb{Q}$. Otherwise, the only solutions there can be are those with $l^2+l=0$ and $k^2+k=m$, and there's certainly only a bounded number of those.



Multiplying by the denominator, we see that we are being asked for a bound on the number of solutions to
$$a (k^2 + k) + b (l^2 + l) = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. We multiply both sides by $4$ and add $a+b$ to complete the squares. Thus we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$a k^2 + b l^2 = c$$
with $k$, $l$ in dyadic intervals. Multiplying by $a$ and then replacing $a k$ by $k$, we reduce our problem to that of bounding the number of solutions to
$$k^2 + d l^2 = n$$
for given $d$ and $n$,
with $k$ and $l$ in dyadic intervals $K<kleq 2 K$, $L<lleq 2 L$.
(I take the implied constant in the bound you wish is allowed to depend on $sigma$. The bound I will give will depend on $d$, though not on $n$.)



For $d>0$, the number of solutions is obviously bounded by the number of ideals of norm $n$ in the ring of integers of $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$. That number is bounded by the number of divisors of $n$, which is $O_epsilon(n^epsilon) = O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$. To obtain the bound $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$, note that, if $L^2 < 2K/3d$, there can be at most one solutions to your equation, as two consecutive values of $k^2$ differ by at least $2 K + 1$, and $d (2 L)^2 - d L^2 = 3 d L^2$.



For $d<0$, you also have to take quadratic units in $mathbb{Q}(sqrt{d})$, but, as there is only a logarithmic number of them in a box of given size (the group of units being isomorphic to $mathbb{Z}$ times bounded torsion), you still get a bound of $O_epsilon(max(K,L)^epsilon)$, and hence of $O_epsilon(min(K,L)^epsilon)$.



The only exception is given by $n=0$ and $d$ of the form $-r^2$, $r$ an integer. Then the number of solutions to $k^2+d l^2 = n$ is evidently infinite, and the number of solutions in a box is linear on the size of the box. It is easy to see that this is the case of $c=-(a+ b)/4$, $a b=-r^2$ in the equation $a (k^2+k) + b (l^2+ l) = c$. That case corresponds to $sigmain mathbb{Q}^2$, $m = (sigma-1)/4$ (and thus $sigmain mathbb{Z}^2$) in the original problem.



tl;dr a simple exercise in quadratic number fields







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 14 at 19:22

























answered Mar 14 at 16:24









NellNell

35810




35810








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
    $endgroup$
    – Marcelo Nogueira
    Mar 14 at 18:27
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
    $endgroup$
    – Marcelo Nogueira
    Mar 14 at 18:27










1




1




$begingroup$
Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
Mar 14 at 18:27






$begingroup$
Nell, thanks so much for your explanation !
$endgroup$
– Marcelo Nogueira
Mar 14 at 18:27




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325448%2fupper-bound-for-the-number-of-solutions-of-a-diophantine-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?