Is it possible that AIC = BIC?












6












$begingroup$


Two well-known (and related) measures of model complexity from statistics are the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian Information
Criterion (BIC).



When might AIC = BIC?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 10




    $begingroup$
    You should try writing down the formulas and setting them equal to each other :) You will get the answer immediately.
    $endgroup$
    – guy
    Mar 14 at 13:18
















6












$begingroup$


Two well-known (and related) measures of model complexity from statistics are the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian Information
Criterion (BIC).



When might AIC = BIC?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 10




    $begingroup$
    You should try writing down the formulas and setting them equal to each other :) You will get the answer immediately.
    $endgroup$
    – guy
    Mar 14 at 13:18














6












6








6





$begingroup$


Two well-known (and related) measures of model complexity from statistics are the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian Information
Criterion (BIC).



When might AIC = BIC?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Two well-known (and related) measures of model complexity from statistics are the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian Information
Criterion (BIC).



When might AIC = BIC?







aic bic






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 14 at 14:06









Richard Hardy

27.8k642128




27.8k642128










asked Mar 14 at 13:09









JanJan

1515




1515








  • 10




    $begingroup$
    You should try writing down the formulas and setting them equal to each other :) You will get the answer immediately.
    $endgroup$
    – guy
    Mar 14 at 13:18














  • 10




    $begingroup$
    You should try writing down the formulas and setting them equal to each other :) You will get the answer immediately.
    $endgroup$
    – guy
    Mar 14 at 13:18








10




10




$begingroup$
You should try writing down the formulas and setting them equal to each other :) You will get the answer immediately.
$endgroup$
– guy
Mar 14 at 13:18




$begingroup$
You should try writing down the formulas and setting them equal to each other :) You will get the answer immediately.
$endgroup$
– guy
Mar 14 at 13:18










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















17












$begingroup$

As a reminder:



$$AIC = - 2 log mathcal{L}(hat{theta}|X)+2k $$



$$BIC = - 2 log mathcal{L}(hat{theta}|X)+k ln(n)$$



So for what values of $n$ is $2 = ln(n)$?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 8




    $begingroup$
    (+1) I noticed that for $BIC$ you write $log$ and $ln$ in the same expression. Is this distinction necessary?
    $endgroup$
    – Sycorax
    Mar 14 at 19:23












  • $begingroup$
    Both logarithms have $e$ as their basis. It is just that log-likelihood (instead of ln-likelihood) is the term we use to describe the natural logarithm of the likelihood.
    $endgroup$
    – Stats
    Mar 14 at 19:27












  • $begingroup$
    @Sycorax: I guess it's to signify that for the $log$ it really doesn't matter (as long as you're consistent) whereas for the $ln$, well it has to be $e$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mehrdad
    Mar 15 at 0:37








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But $n$ should be an integer, right?
    $endgroup$
    – innisfree
    Mar 15 at 5:44










  • $begingroup$
    @innisfree Not always. E.g., for generalized additive models the estimated degrees of freedom are usually not integers.
    $endgroup$
    – Roland
    Mar 15 at 7:12













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f397496%2fis-it-possible-that-aic-bic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









17












$begingroup$

As a reminder:



$$AIC = - 2 log mathcal{L}(hat{theta}|X)+2k $$



$$BIC = - 2 log mathcal{L}(hat{theta}|X)+k ln(n)$$



So for what values of $n$ is $2 = ln(n)$?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 8




    $begingroup$
    (+1) I noticed that for $BIC$ you write $log$ and $ln$ in the same expression. Is this distinction necessary?
    $endgroup$
    – Sycorax
    Mar 14 at 19:23












  • $begingroup$
    Both logarithms have $e$ as their basis. It is just that log-likelihood (instead of ln-likelihood) is the term we use to describe the natural logarithm of the likelihood.
    $endgroup$
    – Stats
    Mar 14 at 19:27












  • $begingroup$
    @Sycorax: I guess it's to signify that for the $log$ it really doesn't matter (as long as you're consistent) whereas for the $ln$, well it has to be $e$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mehrdad
    Mar 15 at 0:37








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But $n$ should be an integer, right?
    $endgroup$
    – innisfree
    Mar 15 at 5:44










  • $begingroup$
    @innisfree Not always. E.g., for generalized additive models the estimated degrees of freedom are usually not integers.
    $endgroup$
    – Roland
    Mar 15 at 7:12


















17












$begingroup$

As a reminder:



$$AIC = - 2 log mathcal{L}(hat{theta}|X)+2k $$



$$BIC = - 2 log mathcal{L}(hat{theta}|X)+k ln(n)$$



So for what values of $n$ is $2 = ln(n)$?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 8




    $begingroup$
    (+1) I noticed that for $BIC$ you write $log$ and $ln$ in the same expression. Is this distinction necessary?
    $endgroup$
    – Sycorax
    Mar 14 at 19:23












  • $begingroup$
    Both logarithms have $e$ as their basis. It is just that log-likelihood (instead of ln-likelihood) is the term we use to describe the natural logarithm of the likelihood.
    $endgroup$
    – Stats
    Mar 14 at 19:27












  • $begingroup$
    @Sycorax: I guess it's to signify that for the $log$ it really doesn't matter (as long as you're consistent) whereas for the $ln$, well it has to be $e$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mehrdad
    Mar 15 at 0:37








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But $n$ should be an integer, right?
    $endgroup$
    – innisfree
    Mar 15 at 5:44










  • $begingroup$
    @innisfree Not always. E.g., for generalized additive models the estimated degrees of freedom are usually not integers.
    $endgroup$
    – Roland
    Mar 15 at 7:12
















17












17








17





$begingroup$

As a reminder:



$$AIC = - 2 log mathcal{L}(hat{theta}|X)+2k $$



$$BIC = - 2 log mathcal{L}(hat{theta}|X)+k ln(n)$$



So for what values of $n$ is $2 = ln(n)$?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



As a reminder:



$$AIC = - 2 log mathcal{L}(hat{theta}|X)+2k $$



$$BIC = - 2 log mathcal{L}(hat{theta}|X)+k ln(n)$$



So for what values of $n$ is $2 = ln(n)$?







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 14 at 13:54









StatsStats

668210




668210








  • 8




    $begingroup$
    (+1) I noticed that for $BIC$ you write $log$ and $ln$ in the same expression. Is this distinction necessary?
    $endgroup$
    – Sycorax
    Mar 14 at 19:23












  • $begingroup$
    Both logarithms have $e$ as their basis. It is just that log-likelihood (instead of ln-likelihood) is the term we use to describe the natural logarithm of the likelihood.
    $endgroup$
    – Stats
    Mar 14 at 19:27












  • $begingroup$
    @Sycorax: I guess it's to signify that for the $log$ it really doesn't matter (as long as you're consistent) whereas for the $ln$, well it has to be $e$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mehrdad
    Mar 15 at 0:37








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But $n$ should be an integer, right?
    $endgroup$
    – innisfree
    Mar 15 at 5:44










  • $begingroup$
    @innisfree Not always. E.g., for generalized additive models the estimated degrees of freedom are usually not integers.
    $endgroup$
    – Roland
    Mar 15 at 7:12
















  • 8




    $begingroup$
    (+1) I noticed that for $BIC$ you write $log$ and $ln$ in the same expression. Is this distinction necessary?
    $endgroup$
    – Sycorax
    Mar 14 at 19:23












  • $begingroup$
    Both logarithms have $e$ as their basis. It is just that log-likelihood (instead of ln-likelihood) is the term we use to describe the natural logarithm of the likelihood.
    $endgroup$
    – Stats
    Mar 14 at 19:27












  • $begingroup$
    @Sycorax: I guess it's to signify that for the $log$ it really doesn't matter (as long as you're consistent) whereas for the $ln$, well it has to be $e$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mehrdad
    Mar 15 at 0:37








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But $n$ should be an integer, right?
    $endgroup$
    – innisfree
    Mar 15 at 5:44










  • $begingroup$
    @innisfree Not always. E.g., for generalized additive models the estimated degrees of freedom are usually not integers.
    $endgroup$
    – Roland
    Mar 15 at 7:12










8




8




$begingroup$
(+1) I noticed that for $BIC$ you write $log$ and $ln$ in the same expression. Is this distinction necessary?
$endgroup$
– Sycorax
Mar 14 at 19:23






$begingroup$
(+1) I noticed that for $BIC$ you write $log$ and $ln$ in the same expression. Is this distinction necessary?
$endgroup$
– Sycorax
Mar 14 at 19:23














$begingroup$
Both logarithms have $e$ as their basis. It is just that log-likelihood (instead of ln-likelihood) is the term we use to describe the natural logarithm of the likelihood.
$endgroup$
– Stats
Mar 14 at 19:27






$begingroup$
Both logarithms have $e$ as their basis. It is just that log-likelihood (instead of ln-likelihood) is the term we use to describe the natural logarithm of the likelihood.
$endgroup$
– Stats
Mar 14 at 19:27














$begingroup$
@Sycorax: I guess it's to signify that for the $log$ it really doesn't matter (as long as you're consistent) whereas for the $ln$, well it has to be $e$.
$endgroup$
– Mehrdad
Mar 15 at 0:37






$begingroup$
@Sycorax: I guess it's to signify that for the $log$ it really doesn't matter (as long as you're consistent) whereas for the $ln$, well it has to be $e$.
$endgroup$
– Mehrdad
Mar 15 at 0:37






1




1




$begingroup$
But $n$ should be an integer, right?
$endgroup$
– innisfree
Mar 15 at 5:44




$begingroup$
But $n$ should be an integer, right?
$endgroup$
– innisfree
Mar 15 at 5:44












$begingroup$
@innisfree Not always. E.g., for generalized additive models the estimated degrees of freedom are usually not integers.
$endgroup$
– Roland
Mar 15 at 7:12






$begingroup$
@innisfree Not always. E.g., for generalized additive models the estimated degrees of freedom are usually not integers.
$endgroup$
– Roland
Mar 15 at 7:12




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f397496%2fis-it-possible-that-aic-bic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?