Subadditive lemma for $a_{m+n+2}leq a_n+a_m+g(m)$











up vote
0
down vote

favorite













I have a sequence $a_n$ such that $a_{m+n+2}leq a_n+a_m+g(m)$ where $lim_{m to infty}frac{g(m)}{m}=0$ and $g(m)$ is a positive incresing function.




I need to show that $lim_{n to infty}frac{a_n}{n} =inf{frac{a_n}{n}}$.



Here's what I've came up so far:



Let there be a fixed $k>2$. For all $n>2$ we have that $n = mk+r+2$ with $0leq r <k$ so



$a_n = a_{mk+r+2}leq a_{mk}+a_r+g(r)leq a_{(m-1)k}+a_{k-2}+g(k-2)+a_r+g(r)leq ...leq$



$leq a_k+(m-1)a_{k-2}+(m-1)g(k-2)+a_r+g(r)$.



Now we divide everything by n.



$$frac{a_n}{n}leq frac{a_k}{n}+frac{(m-1)}{n}a_{k-2}+frac{(m-1)}{n}g(k-2)+frac{a_r+g(r)}{n}$$



taking $n to infty$



$limsup frac{a_n}{n}leq frac{a_{k-2}}{k}+frac{g(k-2)}{k} forall k>2$ . In particular $limsup frac{a_n}{n}leq infleft{frac{a_{k-2}}{k}+frac{g(k-2)}{k}right} = infleft{frac{a_{k-2}}{k}right} $



assuming $infleft{frac{a_{k-2}}{k}+frac{g(k-2)}{k}right} not in left{a_1+g(1) , frac{a(2)}{2}+frac{g(2)}{2}right}$ (which is true in the case I need, so even if this is not true in every case, for me it's enough) (last equality comes from the fact that $g(n) = o(n)$)



Now, if I had that $infleft{frac{a_{k-2}}{k}right}leq infleft{frac{a_{k}}{k}right}$ then I've proven what I wanted, as I'd have that $limsupleq inf implies limsup=liminf = lim$ but I can't reach this result.



Any hints on how to proceed or any other ideas for this proof altogether?










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite













    I have a sequence $a_n$ such that $a_{m+n+2}leq a_n+a_m+g(m)$ where $lim_{m to infty}frac{g(m)}{m}=0$ and $g(m)$ is a positive incresing function.




    I need to show that $lim_{n to infty}frac{a_n}{n} =inf{frac{a_n}{n}}$.



    Here's what I've came up so far:



    Let there be a fixed $k>2$. For all $n>2$ we have that $n = mk+r+2$ with $0leq r <k$ so



    $a_n = a_{mk+r+2}leq a_{mk}+a_r+g(r)leq a_{(m-1)k}+a_{k-2}+g(k-2)+a_r+g(r)leq ...leq$



    $leq a_k+(m-1)a_{k-2}+(m-1)g(k-2)+a_r+g(r)$.



    Now we divide everything by n.



    $$frac{a_n}{n}leq frac{a_k}{n}+frac{(m-1)}{n}a_{k-2}+frac{(m-1)}{n}g(k-2)+frac{a_r+g(r)}{n}$$



    taking $n to infty$



    $limsup frac{a_n}{n}leq frac{a_{k-2}}{k}+frac{g(k-2)}{k} forall k>2$ . In particular $limsup frac{a_n}{n}leq infleft{frac{a_{k-2}}{k}+frac{g(k-2)}{k}right} = infleft{frac{a_{k-2}}{k}right} $



    assuming $infleft{frac{a_{k-2}}{k}+frac{g(k-2)}{k}right} not in left{a_1+g(1) , frac{a(2)}{2}+frac{g(2)}{2}right}$ (which is true in the case I need, so even if this is not true in every case, for me it's enough) (last equality comes from the fact that $g(n) = o(n)$)



    Now, if I had that $infleft{frac{a_{k-2}}{k}right}leq infleft{frac{a_{k}}{k}right}$ then I've proven what I wanted, as I'd have that $limsupleq inf implies limsup=liminf = lim$ but I can't reach this result.



    Any hints on how to proceed or any other ideas for this proof altogether?










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite












      I have a sequence $a_n$ such that $a_{m+n+2}leq a_n+a_m+g(m)$ where $lim_{m to infty}frac{g(m)}{m}=0$ and $g(m)$ is a positive incresing function.




      I need to show that $lim_{n to infty}frac{a_n}{n} =inf{frac{a_n}{n}}$.



      Here's what I've came up so far:



      Let there be a fixed $k>2$. For all $n>2$ we have that $n = mk+r+2$ with $0leq r <k$ so



      $a_n = a_{mk+r+2}leq a_{mk}+a_r+g(r)leq a_{(m-1)k}+a_{k-2}+g(k-2)+a_r+g(r)leq ...leq$



      $leq a_k+(m-1)a_{k-2}+(m-1)g(k-2)+a_r+g(r)$.



      Now we divide everything by n.



      $$frac{a_n}{n}leq frac{a_k}{n}+frac{(m-1)}{n}a_{k-2}+frac{(m-1)}{n}g(k-2)+frac{a_r+g(r)}{n}$$



      taking $n to infty$



      $limsup frac{a_n}{n}leq frac{a_{k-2}}{k}+frac{g(k-2)}{k} forall k>2$ . In particular $limsup frac{a_n}{n}leq infleft{frac{a_{k-2}}{k}+frac{g(k-2)}{k}right} = infleft{frac{a_{k-2}}{k}right} $



      assuming $infleft{frac{a_{k-2}}{k}+frac{g(k-2)}{k}right} not in left{a_1+g(1) , frac{a(2)}{2}+frac{g(2)}{2}right}$ (which is true in the case I need, so even if this is not true in every case, for me it's enough) (last equality comes from the fact that $g(n) = o(n)$)



      Now, if I had that $infleft{frac{a_{k-2}}{k}right}leq infleft{frac{a_{k}}{k}right}$ then I've proven what I wanted, as I'd have that $limsupleq inf implies limsup=liminf = lim$ but I can't reach this result.



      Any hints on how to proceed or any other ideas for this proof altogether?










      share|cite|improve this question














      I have a sequence $a_n$ such that $a_{m+n+2}leq a_n+a_m+g(m)$ where $lim_{m to infty}frac{g(m)}{m}=0$ and $g(m)$ is a positive incresing function.




      I need to show that $lim_{n to infty}frac{a_n}{n} =inf{frac{a_n}{n}}$.



      Here's what I've came up so far:



      Let there be a fixed $k>2$. For all $n>2$ we have that $n = mk+r+2$ with $0leq r <k$ so



      $a_n = a_{mk+r+2}leq a_{mk}+a_r+g(r)leq a_{(m-1)k}+a_{k-2}+g(k-2)+a_r+g(r)leq ...leq$



      $leq a_k+(m-1)a_{k-2}+(m-1)g(k-2)+a_r+g(r)$.



      Now we divide everything by n.



      $$frac{a_n}{n}leq frac{a_k}{n}+frac{(m-1)}{n}a_{k-2}+frac{(m-1)}{n}g(k-2)+frac{a_r+g(r)}{n}$$



      taking $n to infty$



      $limsup frac{a_n}{n}leq frac{a_{k-2}}{k}+frac{g(k-2)}{k} forall k>2$ . In particular $limsup frac{a_n}{n}leq infleft{frac{a_{k-2}}{k}+frac{g(k-2)}{k}right} = infleft{frac{a_{k-2}}{k}right} $



      assuming $infleft{frac{a_{k-2}}{k}+frac{g(k-2)}{k}right} not in left{a_1+g(1) , frac{a(2)}{2}+frac{g(2)}{2}right}$ (which is true in the case I need, so even if this is not true in every case, for me it's enough) (last equality comes from the fact that $g(n) = o(n)$)



      Now, if I had that $infleft{frac{a_{k-2}}{k}right}leq infleft{frac{a_{k}}{k}right}$ then I've proven what I wanted, as I'd have that $limsupleq inf implies limsup=liminf = lim$ but I can't reach this result.



      Any hints on how to proceed or any other ideas for this proof altogether?







      real-analysis sequences-and-series analysis convergence






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 19 at 18:01









      Matheus barros castro

      375110




      375110



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005270%2fsubadditive-lemma-for-a-mn2-leq-a-na-mgm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005270%2fsubadditive-lemma-for-a-mn2-leq-a-na-mgm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

          ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

          Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?