How to conserve 2D lattice distances when layed onto a surface?












0












$begingroup$


Given a surface $varphi(x,y) = begin{pmatrix}x \ y \ f(x, y)end{pmatrix} in mathbb{R}^3$, where $f$ is continous (and differentiable), $x, y in mathbb{R}$, I am trying to find a map $begin{pmatrix} hat{x} \ hat{y}end{pmatrix} = Phibegin{pmatrix}x\yend{pmatrix} $ such that the distances of given points in the $x$-$y$-plane (e.g. square lattice, hexagonal lattice) are conserved when "layed" on the surface under the transformation $Phi$. By intuition, such a transformation should contract points if the surface is steep and just adopt the points from the $x$-$y$-plane where it is flat.



Does such a transformation $Phi$ exist? And can it be derived or approximated for a given function $f$?



I tried to approach this problem in 1D: for a curve $begin{pmatrix}x \ f(x)end{pmatrix}$ this can be solved by reparameterizing the curve such that it has unit speed. One can think of this as laying a chain of equidistant points onto the curve.
For the 1D case I created a Jupyter Notebook but now I am stuck on how to expand this to two dimensions.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Given a surface $varphi(x,y) = begin{pmatrix}x \ y \ f(x, y)end{pmatrix} in mathbb{R}^3$, where $f$ is continous (and differentiable), $x, y in mathbb{R}$, I am trying to find a map $begin{pmatrix} hat{x} \ hat{y}end{pmatrix} = Phibegin{pmatrix}x\yend{pmatrix} $ such that the distances of given points in the $x$-$y$-plane (e.g. square lattice, hexagonal lattice) are conserved when "layed" on the surface under the transformation $Phi$. By intuition, such a transformation should contract points if the surface is steep and just adopt the points from the $x$-$y$-plane where it is flat.



    Does such a transformation $Phi$ exist? And can it be derived or approximated for a given function $f$?



    I tried to approach this problem in 1D: for a curve $begin{pmatrix}x \ f(x)end{pmatrix}$ this can be solved by reparameterizing the curve such that it has unit speed. One can think of this as laying a chain of equidistant points onto the curve.
    For the 1D case I created a Jupyter Notebook but now I am stuck on how to expand this to two dimensions.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Given a surface $varphi(x,y) = begin{pmatrix}x \ y \ f(x, y)end{pmatrix} in mathbb{R}^3$, where $f$ is continous (and differentiable), $x, y in mathbb{R}$, I am trying to find a map $begin{pmatrix} hat{x} \ hat{y}end{pmatrix} = Phibegin{pmatrix}x\yend{pmatrix} $ such that the distances of given points in the $x$-$y$-plane (e.g. square lattice, hexagonal lattice) are conserved when "layed" on the surface under the transformation $Phi$. By intuition, such a transformation should contract points if the surface is steep and just adopt the points from the $x$-$y$-plane where it is flat.



      Does such a transformation $Phi$ exist? And can it be derived or approximated for a given function $f$?



      I tried to approach this problem in 1D: for a curve $begin{pmatrix}x \ f(x)end{pmatrix}$ this can be solved by reparameterizing the curve such that it has unit speed. One can think of this as laying a chain of equidistant points onto the curve.
      For the 1D case I created a Jupyter Notebook but now I am stuck on how to expand this to two dimensions.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Given a surface $varphi(x,y) = begin{pmatrix}x \ y \ f(x, y)end{pmatrix} in mathbb{R}^3$, where $f$ is continous (and differentiable), $x, y in mathbb{R}$, I am trying to find a map $begin{pmatrix} hat{x} \ hat{y}end{pmatrix} = Phibegin{pmatrix}x\yend{pmatrix} $ such that the distances of given points in the $x$-$y$-plane (e.g. square lattice, hexagonal lattice) are conserved when "layed" on the surface under the transformation $Phi$. By intuition, such a transformation should contract points if the surface is steep and just adopt the points from the $x$-$y$-plane where it is flat.



      Does such a transformation $Phi$ exist? And can it be derived or approximated for a given function $f$?



      I tried to approach this problem in 1D: for a curve $begin{pmatrix}x \ f(x)end{pmatrix}$ this can be solved by reparameterizing the curve such that it has unit speed. One can think of this as laying a chain of equidistant points onto the curve.
      For the 1D case I created a Jupyter Notebook but now I am stuck on how to expand this to two dimensions.







      multivariable-calculus differential-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 28 '18 at 16:39









      tam724tam724

      12




      12






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017353%2fhow-to-conserve-2d-lattice-distances-when-layed-onto-a-surface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017353%2fhow-to-conserve-2d-lattice-distances-when-layed-onto-a-surface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

          ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

          Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?