When is the pointwise convergence on $A$ equivalent to the uniform one?












4












$begingroup$


Let $A$ be a finite set of $[0,1]$ and $F$ a sub-vector-space of $C([0,1],mathbb R^n)$.



When is the pointwise convergence on $A$ equivalent to the uniform one.



And with $A$ be countable?



I suppose the finite dimension of $F$ is sufficient but is it necessary? Not sure for the second case.



Is there a more general condition to have this equivalence (with any vector-space)?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Look up for Egorov-Theorem
    $endgroup$
    – quallenjäger
    Jan 21 '18 at 12:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Interestingproblems Do you wish to interpret “the uniform one” as the uniform convergence on $A$ or as the uniform convergence on $[0,1]$, as in this recent question?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Ravsky
    Nov 29 '18 at 18:20










  • $begingroup$
    It is not really clear what you are asking. It seems that the question mentioned in Alex Ravsky's comment is a duplicate, but stated more precisely.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 29 '18 at 23:57
















4












$begingroup$


Let $A$ be a finite set of $[0,1]$ and $F$ a sub-vector-space of $C([0,1],mathbb R^n)$.



When is the pointwise convergence on $A$ equivalent to the uniform one.



And with $A$ be countable?



I suppose the finite dimension of $F$ is sufficient but is it necessary? Not sure for the second case.



Is there a more general condition to have this equivalence (with any vector-space)?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Look up for Egorov-Theorem
    $endgroup$
    – quallenjäger
    Jan 21 '18 at 12:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Interestingproblems Do you wish to interpret “the uniform one” as the uniform convergence on $A$ or as the uniform convergence on $[0,1]$, as in this recent question?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Ravsky
    Nov 29 '18 at 18:20










  • $begingroup$
    It is not really clear what you are asking. It seems that the question mentioned in Alex Ravsky's comment is a duplicate, but stated more precisely.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 29 '18 at 23:57














4












4








4


2



$begingroup$


Let $A$ be a finite set of $[0,1]$ and $F$ a sub-vector-space of $C([0,1],mathbb R^n)$.



When is the pointwise convergence on $A$ equivalent to the uniform one.



And with $A$ be countable?



I suppose the finite dimension of $F$ is sufficient but is it necessary? Not sure for the second case.



Is there a more general condition to have this equivalence (with any vector-space)?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $A$ be a finite set of $[0,1]$ and $F$ a sub-vector-space of $C([0,1],mathbb R^n)$.



When is the pointwise convergence on $A$ equivalent to the uniform one.



And with $A$ be countable?



I suppose the finite dimension of $F$ is sufficient but is it necessary? Not sure for the second case.



Is there a more general condition to have this equivalence (with any vector-space)?







general-topology functional-analysis convergence vector-spaces uniform-convergence






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 29 '18 at 18:22









Alex Ravsky

39.6k32181




39.6k32181










asked Jan 21 '18 at 12:21







user371663



















  • $begingroup$
    Look up for Egorov-Theorem
    $endgroup$
    – quallenjäger
    Jan 21 '18 at 12:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Interestingproblems Do you wish to interpret “the uniform one” as the uniform convergence on $A$ or as the uniform convergence on $[0,1]$, as in this recent question?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Ravsky
    Nov 29 '18 at 18:20










  • $begingroup$
    It is not really clear what you are asking. It seems that the question mentioned in Alex Ravsky's comment is a duplicate, but stated more precisely.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 29 '18 at 23:57


















  • $begingroup$
    Look up for Egorov-Theorem
    $endgroup$
    – quallenjäger
    Jan 21 '18 at 12:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Interestingproblems Do you wish to interpret “the uniform one” as the uniform convergence on $A$ or as the uniform convergence on $[0,1]$, as in this recent question?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Ravsky
    Nov 29 '18 at 18:20










  • $begingroup$
    It is not really clear what you are asking. It seems that the question mentioned in Alex Ravsky's comment is a duplicate, but stated more precisely.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 29 '18 at 23:57
















$begingroup$
Look up for Egorov-Theorem
$endgroup$
– quallenjäger
Jan 21 '18 at 12:43




$begingroup$
Look up for Egorov-Theorem
$endgroup$
– quallenjäger
Jan 21 '18 at 12:43




1




1




$begingroup$
@Interestingproblems Do you wish to interpret “the uniform one” as the uniform convergence on $A$ or as the uniform convergence on $[0,1]$, as in this recent question?
$endgroup$
– Alex Ravsky
Nov 29 '18 at 18:20




$begingroup$
@Interestingproblems Do you wish to interpret “the uniform one” as the uniform convergence on $A$ or as the uniform convergence on $[0,1]$, as in this recent question?
$endgroup$
– Alex Ravsky
Nov 29 '18 at 18:20












$begingroup$
It is not really clear what you are asking. It seems that the question mentioned in Alex Ravsky's comment is a duplicate, but stated more precisely.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Nov 29 '18 at 23:57




$begingroup$
It is not really clear what you are asking. It seems that the question mentioned in Alex Ravsky's comment is a duplicate, but stated more precisely.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Nov 29 '18 at 23:57










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

In this answer I assume the second interpretation from my comment. In the thread linked there I answered the question for the case of finite $A$ and $n=1$. I expect the case of $n>1$ can be dealt very similarly.
I can add to that my answer the following.



There exists a sequence $f_n$ of functions of $C([0,1],Bbb R)$ which converges on $[0,1]$ to the zero function pointwise, but not uniformly. Namely, for each $n$ let $f_n(0)=f_n(1)=f_n(1/n)=0$, $f_n(1/(2n))=1$ and between the points $0$, $1/(2n)$, $1/n$ and $1$ the function $f_n$ is linear.



For each $A$ not dense in $X$ we can pick a non-zero function $f_Ain C([0,1],Bbb R)$ such that $f_A|A$ is zero. Let $F$ be a one-dimensional linear space $Fsubset C([0,1],Bbb R)$ spanned by $f_A$. Then $f|A$ is zero function for any $fin F$, so pointwise convergence on $A$ to zero of the sequence ${f_n}$ of functions of $F$ does not imply its (uniform) convergence on $[0,1]$.



For any linear space $Fsubset C([0,1],Bbb R)$, whose dimension $dim F$ is finite there exists a subset $A$ of $[0,1]$ such that $|A|=dim F $ and restriction $f|A$ of $f$ on $A$ is a non-zero function for each non-zero function $fin F$. So, in this case, by proposition from my answer, for each sequence ${f_n}$ of functions of $F$ and each function $fin F$, ${f_n}$ converges to $f$ uniformly on $[0,1]$ iff ${f_n|A}$ converges to $f|A$ pointwise on $A$.



The existence of such a set $A$ we can prove by induction with respect to $dim F$. For $dim F=1$ pick $A={a}$, where $ain [0,1]$ is an arbitrary point such that $f(a)ne 0$ for any non-zero function $fin F$. Assume that we alredy have proved the induction hypothesis for $dim Fle d$. Let $dim F=d+1$ and $b_1,dots, b_{d+1}$ be the basis of the space $F$. Let $F’$ be the linear subspace of $F$ spanned by functions $b_1,dots, b_d$. By the induction hypothesis there exists a subset $A’$ of $[0,1]$ of size $d$ such that $f|A’$ is non-zero function for each non-zero function $fin F’$. Put $G={fin F:f|A’$ is the zero function$}$. Since $|A’|=d$, the map $F’toBbb R^{A’}$, $fmapsto f|A$ is surjective. Using this we can easily show that $F=F’+G$. Now, let $f, gin G$ be any functions. There exist not both zero $lambda$ and $mu$ such that $lambda f+mu gin F$. Since $(lambda f+mu g)|A=0_A$, $lambda f+mu g=0$. Thus $dim G=1$. Pick an arbitrary point $ain [0,1]$ such that $f(a)ne 0$ any non-zero function $fin G$ and put $A=A’cup{a}$. Using that $F=F’+G$, we can easily show that $A$ is a required set.



But I don’t know whether there exists an infinitely dimensional $F$ such that pointwise convergence on $[0,1]$ to zero of the sequence ${f_n}$ of functions of $F$ implies its uniform convergence.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2614598%2fwhen-is-the-pointwise-convergence-on-a-equivalent-to-the-uniform-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown
























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    In this answer I assume the second interpretation from my comment. In the thread linked there I answered the question for the case of finite $A$ and $n=1$. I expect the case of $n>1$ can be dealt very similarly.
    I can add to that my answer the following.



    There exists a sequence $f_n$ of functions of $C([0,1],Bbb R)$ which converges on $[0,1]$ to the zero function pointwise, but not uniformly. Namely, for each $n$ let $f_n(0)=f_n(1)=f_n(1/n)=0$, $f_n(1/(2n))=1$ and between the points $0$, $1/(2n)$, $1/n$ and $1$ the function $f_n$ is linear.



    For each $A$ not dense in $X$ we can pick a non-zero function $f_Ain C([0,1],Bbb R)$ such that $f_A|A$ is zero. Let $F$ be a one-dimensional linear space $Fsubset C([0,1],Bbb R)$ spanned by $f_A$. Then $f|A$ is zero function for any $fin F$, so pointwise convergence on $A$ to zero of the sequence ${f_n}$ of functions of $F$ does not imply its (uniform) convergence on $[0,1]$.



    For any linear space $Fsubset C([0,1],Bbb R)$, whose dimension $dim F$ is finite there exists a subset $A$ of $[0,1]$ such that $|A|=dim F $ and restriction $f|A$ of $f$ on $A$ is a non-zero function for each non-zero function $fin F$. So, in this case, by proposition from my answer, for each sequence ${f_n}$ of functions of $F$ and each function $fin F$, ${f_n}$ converges to $f$ uniformly on $[0,1]$ iff ${f_n|A}$ converges to $f|A$ pointwise on $A$.



    The existence of such a set $A$ we can prove by induction with respect to $dim F$. For $dim F=1$ pick $A={a}$, where $ain [0,1]$ is an arbitrary point such that $f(a)ne 0$ for any non-zero function $fin F$. Assume that we alredy have proved the induction hypothesis for $dim Fle d$. Let $dim F=d+1$ and $b_1,dots, b_{d+1}$ be the basis of the space $F$. Let $F’$ be the linear subspace of $F$ spanned by functions $b_1,dots, b_d$. By the induction hypothesis there exists a subset $A’$ of $[0,1]$ of size $d$ such that $f|A’$ is non-zero function for each non-zero function $fin F’$. Put $G={fin F:f|A’$ is the zero function$}$. Since $|A’|=d$, the map $F’toBbb R^{A’}$, $fmapsto f|A$ is surjective. Using this we can easily show that $F=F’+G$. Now, let $f, gin G$ be any functions. There exist not both zero $lambda$ and $mu$ such that $lambda f+mu gin F$. Since $(lambda f+mu g)|A=0_A$, $lambda f+mu g=0$. Thus $dim G=1$. Pick an arbitrary point $ain [0,1]$ such that $f(a)ne 0$ any non-zero function $fin G$ and put $A=A’cup{a}$. Using that $F=F’+G$, we can easily show that $A$ is a required set.



    But I don’t know whether there exists an infinitely dimensional $F$ such that pointwise convergence on $[0,1]$ to zero of the sequence ${f_n}$ of functions of $F$ implies its uniform convergence.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      In this answer I assume the second interpretation from my comment. In the thread linked there I answered the question for the case of finite $A$ and $n=1$. I expect the case of $n>1$ can be dealt very similarly.
      I can add to that my answer the following.



      There exists a sequence $f_n$ of functions of $C([0,1],Bbb R)$ which converges on $[0,1]$ to the zero function pointwise, but not uniformly. Namely, for each $n$ let $f_n(0)=f_n(1)=f_n(1/n)=0$, $f_n(1/(2n))=1$ and between the points $0$, $1/(2n)$, $1/n$ and $1$ the function $f_n$ is linear.



      For each $A$ not dense in $X$ we can pick a non-zero function $f_Ain C([0,1],Bbb R)$ such that $f_A|A$ is zero. Let $F$ be a one-dimensional linear space $Fsubset C([0,1],Bbb R)$ spanned by $f_A$. Then $f|A$ is zero function for any $fin F$, so pointwise convergence on $A$ to zero of the sequence ${f_n}$ of functions of $F$ does not imply its (uniform) convergence on $[0,1]$.



      For any linear space $Fsubset C([0,1],Bbb R)$, whose dimension $dim F$ is finite there exists a subset $A$ of $[0,1]$ such that $|A|=dim F $ and restriction $f|A$ of $f$ on $A$ is a non-zero function for each non-zero function $fin F$. So, in this case, by proposition from my answer, for each sequence ${f_n}$ of functions of $F$ and each function $fin F$, ${f_n}$ converges to $f$ uniformly on $[0,1]$ iff ${f_n|A}$ converges to $f|A$ pointwise on $A$.



      The existence of such a set $A$ we can prove by induction with respect to $dim F$. For $dim F=1$ pick $A={a}$, where $ain [0,1]$ is an arbitrary point such that $f(a)ne 0$ for any non-zero function $fin F$. Assume that we alredy have proved the induction hypothesis for $dim Fle d$. Let $dim F=d+1$ and $b_1,dots, b_{d+1}$ be the basis of the space $F$. Let $F’$ be the linear subspace of $F$ spanned by functions $b_1,dots, b_d$. By the induction hypothesis there exists a subset $A’$ of $[0,1]$ of size $d$ such that $f|A’$ is non-zero function for each non-zero function $fin F’$. Put $G={fin F:f|A’$ is the zero function$}$. Since $|A’|=d$, the map $F’toBbb R^{A’}$, $fmapsto f|A$ is surjective. Using this we can easily show that $F=F’+G$. Now, let $f, gin G$ be any functions. There exist not both zero $lambda$ and $mu$ such that $lambda f+mu gin F$. Since $(lambda f+mu g)|A=0_A$, $lambda f+mu g=0$. Thus $dim G=1$. Pick an arbitrary point $ain [0,1]$ such that $f(a)ne 0$ any non-zero function $fin G$ and put $A=A’cup{a}$. Using that $F=F’+G$, we can easily show that $A$ is a required set.



      But I don’t know whether there exists an infinitely dimensional $F$ such that pointwise convergence on $[0,1]$ to zero of the sequence ${f_n}$ of functions of $F$ implies its uniform convergence.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        In this answer I assume the second interpretation from my comment. In the thread linked there I answered the question for the case of finite $A$ and $n=1$. I expect the case of $n>1$ can be dealt very similarly.
        I can add to that my answer the following.



        There exists a sequence $f_n$ of functions of $C([0,1],Bbb R)$ which converges on $[0,1]$ to the zero function pointwise, but not uniformly. Namely, for each $n$ let $f_n(0)=f_n(1)=f_n(1/n)=0$, $f_n(1/(2n))=1$ and between the points $0$, $1/(2n)$, $1/n$ and $1$ the function $f_n$ is linear.



        For each $A$ not dense in $X$ we can pick a non-zero function $f_Ain C([0,1],Bbb R)$ such that $f_A|A$ is zero. Let $F$ be a one-dimensional linear space $Fsubset C([0,1],Bbb R)$ spanned by $f_A$. Then $f|A$ is zero function for any $fin F$, so pointwise convergence on $A$ to zero of the sequence ${f_n}$ of functions of $F$ does not imply its (uniform) convergence on $[0,1]$.



        For any linear space $Fsubset C([0,1],Bbb R)$, whose dimension $dim F$ is finite there exists a subset $A$ of $[0,1]$ such that $|A|=dim F $ and restriction $f|A$ of $f$ on $A$ is a non-zero function for each non-zero function $fin F$. So, in this case, by proposition from my answer, for each sequence ${f_n}$ of functions of $F$ and each function $fin F$, ${f_n}$ converges to $f$ uniformly on $[0,1]$ iff ${f_n|A}$ converges to $f|A$ pointwise on $A$.



        The existence of such a set $A$ we can prove by induction with respect to $dim F$. For $dim F=1$ pick $A={a}$, where $ain [0,1]$ is an arbitrary point such that $f(a)ne 0$ for any non-zero function $fin F$. Assume that we alredy have proved the induction hypothesis for $dim Fle d$. Let $dim F=d+1$ and $b_1,dots, b_{d+1}$ be the basis of the space $F$. Let $F’$ be the linear subspace of $F$ spanned by functions $b_1,dots, b_d$. By the induction hypothesis there exists a subset $A’$ of $[0,1]$ of size $d$ such that $f|A’$ is non-zero function for each non-zero function $fin F’$. Put $G={fin F:f|A’$ is the zero function$}$. Since $|A’|=d$, the map $F’toBbb R^{A’}$, $fmapsto f|A$ is surjective. Using this we can easily show that $F=F’+G$. Now, let $f, gin G$ be any functions. There exist not both zero $lambda$ and $mu$ such that $lambda f+mu gin F$. Since $(lambda f+mu g)|A=0_A$, $lambda f+mu g=0$. Thus $dim G=1$. Pick an arbitrary point $ain [0,1]$ such that $f(a)ne 0$ any non-zero function $fin G$ and put $A=A’cup{a}$. Using that $F=F’+G$, we can easily show that $A$ is a required set.



        But I don’t know whether there exists an infinitely dimensional $F$ such that pointwise convergence on $[0,1]$ to zero of the sequence ${f_n}$ of functions of $F$ implies its uniform convergence.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        In this answer I assume the second interpretation from my comment. In the thread linked there I answered the question for the case of finite $A$ and $n=1$. I expect the case of $n>1$ can be dealt very similarly.
        I can add to that my answer the following.



        There exists a sequence $f_n$ of functions of $C([0,1],Bbb R)$ which converges on $[0,1]$ to the zero function pointwise, but not uniformly. Namely, for each $n$ let $f_n(0)=f_n(1)=f_n(1/n)=0$, $f_n(1/(2n))=1$ and between the points $0$, $1/(2n)$, $1/n$ and $1$ the function $f_n$ is linear.



        For each $A$ not dense in $X$ we can pick a non-zero function $f_Ain C([0,1],Bbb R)$ such that $f_A|A$ is zero. Let $F$ be a one-dimensional linear space $Fsubset C([0,1],Bbb R)$ spanned by $f_A$. Then $f|A$ is zero function for any $fin F$, so pointwise convergence on $A$ to zero of the sequence ${f_n}$ of functions of $F$ does not imply its (uniform) convergence on $[0,1]$.



        For any linear space $Fsubset C([0,1],Bbb R)$, whose dimension $dim F$ is finite there exists a subset $A$ of $[0,1]$ such that $|A|=dim F $ and restriction $f|A$ of $f$ on $A$ is a non-zero function for each non-zero function $fin F$. So, in this case, by proposition from my answer, for each sequence ${f_n}$ of functions of $F$ and each function $fin F$, ${f_n}$ converges to $f$ uniformly on $[0,1]$ iff ${f_n|A}$ converges to $f|A$ pointwise on $A$.



        The existence of such a set $A$ we can prove by induction with respect to $dim F$. For $dim F=1$ pick $A={a}$, where $ain [0,1]$ is an arbitrary point such that $f(a)ne 0$ for any non-zero function $fin F$. Assume that we alredy have proved the induction hypothesis for $dim Fle d$. Let $dim F=d+1$ and $b_1,dots, b_{d+1}$ be the basis of the space $F$. Let $F’$ be the linear subspace of $F$ spanned by functions $b_1,dots, b_d$. By the induction hypothesis there exists a subset $A’$ of $[0,1]$ of size $d$ such that $f|A’$ is non-zero function for each non-zero function $fin F’$. Put $G={fin F:f|A’$ is the zero function$}$. Since $|A’|=d$, the map $F’toBbb R^{A’}$, $fmapsto f|A$ is surjective. Using this we can easily show that $F=F’+G$. Now, let $f, gin G$ be any functions. There exist not both zero $lambda$ and $mu$ such that $lambda f+mu gin F$. Since $(lambda f+mu g)|A=0_A$, $lambda f+mu g=0$. Thus $dim G=1$. Pick an arbitrary point $ain [0,1]$ such that $f(a)ne 0$ any non-zero function $fin G$ and put $A=A’cup{a}$. Using that $F=F’+G$, we can easily show that $A$ is a required set.



        But I don’t know whether there exists an infinitely dimensional $F$ such that pointwise convergence on $[0,1]$ to zero of the sequence ${f_n}$ of functions of $F$ implies its uniform convergence.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 1 '18 at 8:51









        Alex RavskyAlex Ravsky

        39.6k32181




        39.6k32181






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2614598%2fwhen-is-the-pointwise-convergence-on-a-equivalent-to-the-uniform-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

            ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

            Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?