Alternative proof that if $a,b,c in mathbb{R}$ and $(a+b+c)c0$?












2












$begingroup$


A problem from a Moscow Olympiad states : let $a,b,c$ be real numbers such that $(a+b+c)c<0$. Show that $b^2-4ac>0$. There is a well known proof of this applying the IVT on the polynomial $f(x) = ax^2+bx+c$. Is there any proof that does not involve any calculus, including IVT?



The question emerged from a reddit post
https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/9znumt/theorems_of_single_variable_calculus/










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    A problem from a Moscow Olympiad states : let $a,b,c$ be real numbers such that $(a+b+c)c<0$. Show that $b^2-4ac>0$. There is a well known proof of this applying the IVT on the polynomial $f(x) = ax^2+bx+c$. Is there any proof that does not involve any calculus, including IVT?



    The question emerged from a reddit post
    https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/9znumt/theorems_of_single_variable_calculus/










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2


      2



      $begingroup$


      A problem from a Moscow Olympiad states : let $a,b,c$ be real numbers such that $(a+b+c)c<0$. Show that $b^2-4ac>0$. There is a well known proof of this applying the IVT on the polynomial $f(x) = ax^2+bx+c$. Is there any proof that does not involve any calculus, including IVT?



      The question emerged from a reddit post
      https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/9znumt/theorems_of_single_variable_calculus/










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      A problem from a Moscow Olympiad states : let $a,b,c$ be real numbers such that $(a+b+c)c<0$. Show that $b^2-4ac>0$. There is a well known proof of this applying the IVT on the polynomial $f(x) = ax^2+bx+c$. Is there any proof that does not involve any calculus, including IVT?



      The question emerged from a reddit post
      https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/9znumt/theorems_of_single_variable_calculus/







      inequality contest-math






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 24 '18 at 5:33









      user21820

      38.8k543153




      38.8k543153










      asked Nov 23 '18 at 21:54









      guestguest

      4,232919




      4,232919






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          10












          $begingroup$

          We have
          $$
          (b^2 - 4ac) + 4(a+b+c)c = (b+2c)^2 ge 0 \
          implies b^2 - 4ac ge - 4(a+b+c)c > 0
          $$



          To give proper credit: The above approach was found after reading
          guest's answer
          and is just a simplification of that solution.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
            $endgroup$
            – guest
            Nov 23 '18 at 22:16






          • 5




            $begingroup$
            @guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
            $endgroup$
            – Martin R
            Nov 23 '18 at 22:51





















          6












          $begingroup$

          Here is a proof that works for any ordered commutative ring:



          Let $a,b,c$ be rationals, reals or elements of any non-trivial ordered commutative ring. Assume that $(a+b+c)c<0$. We show that $b^2-4ac>0$.



          Solution:



          First, observe that the hypothesis implies $(a+b)c<-c ^2$ and that $cneq 0$.
          Then form the matrix
          $$M = left( begin{array}{cc}
          2c & b \
          b & 2a \
          end{array}right)$$

          whose determinant is precicely $4ac-b^2$, and the matrix
          $$ S = left( begin{array}{cc}
          1 & 0 \
          2 & 1 \
          end{array}right)$$

          whose determinant is $1$. Now from the multiplicativity of the determinant $det(SM) =det(S)det(M)=det(M)$. But
          $$det(SM) = det
          left( begin{array}{cc}
          2c & b \
          4c+b & 2(a+b) \
          end{array}right) = 4c(a+b) - b^2-4bc.$$



          But recall that $c(a+b)<-c^2$ so $$4c(a+b)-b^2-4bc < -4c^2-b^2 -4bc = -(b+2c)^2.$$
          The last element is always non-positive and the inequality is strict, so $det(M)=4ac-b^2<0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            $b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
            $endgroup$
            – Martin R
            Nov 23 '18 at 22:11










          • $begingroup$
            @MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
            $endgroup$
            – guest
            Nov 23 '18 at 22:12





















          3












          $begingroup$

          If all you know is completing the square:



          Suppose $b^2-4acleq0$. Then we know the quadratic $ax^2+bx+c$ has at most one real root.



          By completing the square we can rewrite $ax^2+bx+c=aleft(left(x+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2right)$ for some real $d$.



          We have $c=frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2$. Returning to the original expression, complete all the squares:



          $$begin{align}(a+b+c)c&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)left(frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)\
          &=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)frac{b^2}{4a}+left(ad^2frac{b^2}{4a}+left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)ad^2right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
          &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{a}+frac{b^2}{4a^2}right)+d^2left(a^2+ab+frac{b^2}{2}right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
          &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2left(a+frac{b}{2}right)^2+left(ad^2right)^2\
          &geq0text{.}
          end{align}$$

          Thus by contrapositive, $(a+b+c)c<0,Rightarrow, b^2-4ac>0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            2












            $begingroup$

            Here's a silly proof deriving a contradiction from assuming that $(a + b + c)c lt 0 $ and $b^2-4ac le 0$ are simultaneously true.



            1) By assumption



            $$ (a + b + c) c lt 0 $$



            2) Negation of goal: $ b^2 - 4ac gt 0$



            $$ b^2 - 4ac le 0 $$



            3) From 2 by addition



            $$ b^2 le 4ac $$



            4) expand 1



            $$ ac + bc + c^2 < 0 $$



            5) From 4 by addition



            $$ ac < -bc - c^2 $$



            6) From 5 by multiplication



            $$ 4ac < -4bc -4c^2 $$



            7) transitivity $x le y lt z$ implies $x lt z$



            $$ b^2 lt -4bc - 4c^2 $$



            8) from 7 by addition.



            $$ b^2 + 4bc + 4c^2 lt 0 $$



            9) (7) is a perfect square



            $$ (b + 2c)^2 < 0 $$



            10) By assumption, $a, b, c in mathbb{R}$, so the square of $(b + 2c)$ cannot be negative.



            $$ bot $$



            Therefore, $b^2 - 4ac gt 0$ .






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010886%2falternative-proof-that-if-a-b-c-in-mathbbr-and-abcc0-then-b2-4ac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              10












              $begingroup$

              We have
              $$
              (b^2 - 4ac) + 4(a+b+c)c = (b+2c)^2 ge 0 \
              implies b^2 - 4ac ge - 4(a+b+c)c > 0
              $$



              To give proper credit: The above approach was found after reading
              guest's answer
              and is just a simplification of that solution.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$









              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
                $endgroup$
                – guest
                Nov 23 '18 at 22:16






              • 5




                $begingroup$
                @guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
                $endgroup$
                – Martin R
                Nov 23 '18 at 22:51


















              10












              $begingroup$

              We have
              $$
              (b^2 - 4ac) + 4(a+b+c)c = (b+2c)^2 ge 0 \
              implies b^2 - 4ac ge - 4(a+b+c)c > 0
              $$



              To give proper credit: The above approach was found after reading
              guest's answer
              and is just a simplification of that solution.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$









              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
                $endgroup$
                – guest
                Nov 23 '18 at 22:16






              • 5




                $begingroup$
                @guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
                $endgroup$
                – Martin R
                Nov 23 '18 at 22:51
















              10












              10








              10





              $begingroup$

              We have
              $$
              (b^2 - 4ac) + 4(a+b+c)c = (b+2c)^2 ge 0 \
              implies b^2 - 4ac ge - 4(a+b+c)c > 0
              $$



              To give proper credit: The above approach was found after reading
              guest's answer
              and is just a simplification of that solution.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              We have
              $$
              (b^2 - 4ac) + 4(a+b+c)c = (b+2c)^2 ge 0 \
              implies b^2 - 4ac ge - 4(a+b+c)c > 0
              $$



              To give proper credit: The above approach was found after reading
              guest's answer
              and is just a simplification of that solution.







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited Nov 23 '18 at 22:50

























              answered Nov 23 '18 at 22:15









              Martin RMartin R

              27.5k33255




              27.5k33255








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
                $endgroup$
                – guest
                Nov 23 '18 at 22:16






              • 5




                $begingroup$
                @guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
                $endgroup$
                – Martin R
                Nov 23 '18 at 22:51
















              • 1




                $begingroup$
                Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
                $endgroup$
                – guest
                Nov 23 '18 at 22:16






              • 5




                $begingroup$
                @guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
                $endgroup$
                – Martin R
                Nov 23 '18 at 22:51










              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
              $endgroup$
              – guest
              Nov 23 '18 at 22:16




              $begingroup$
              Well that makes my solution a little embarrassing.
              $endgroup$
              – guest
              Nov 23 '18 at 22:16




              5




              5




              $begingroup$
              @guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
              $endgroup$
              – Martin R
              Nov 23 '18 at 22:51






              $begingroup$
              @guest: No, it isn't. It is a normal process that one finds a “complicated” solution first, and only then realizes how it can be simplified.
              $endgroup$
              – Martin R
              Nov 23 '18 at 22:51













              6












              $begingroup$

              Here is a proof that works for any ordered commutative ring:



              Let $a,b,c$ be rationals, reals or elements of any non-trivial ordered commutative ring. Assume that $(a+b+c)c<0$. We show that $b^2-4ac>0$.



              Solution:



              First, observe that the hypothesis implies $(a+b)c<-c ^2$ and that $cneq 0$.
              Then form the matrix
              $$M = left( begin{array}{cc}
              2c & b \
              b & 2a \
              end{array}right)$$

              whose determinant is precicely $4ac-b^2$, and the matrix
              $$ S = left( begin{array}{cc}
              1 & 0 \
              2 & 1 \
              end{array}right)$$

              whose determinant is $1$. Now from the multiplicativity of the determinant $det(SM) =det(S)det(M)=det(M)$. But
              $$det(SM) = det
              left( begin{array}{cc}
              2c & b \
              4c+b & 2(a+b) \
              end{array}right) = 4c(a+b) - b^2-4bc.$$



              But recall that $c(a+b)<-c^2$ so $$4c(a+b)-b^2-4bc < -4c^2-b^2 -4bc = -(b+2c)^2.$$
              The last element is always non-positive and the inequality is strict, so $det(M)=4ac-b^2<0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                $b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
                $endgroup$
                – Martin R
                Nov 23 '18 at 22:11










              • $begingroup$
                @MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
                $endgroup$
                – guest
                Nov 23 '18 at 22:12


















              6












              $begingroup$

              Here is a proof that works for any ordered commutative ring:



              Let $a,b,c$ be rationals, reals or elements of any non-trivial ordered commutative ring. Assume that $(a+b+c)c<0$. We show that $b^2-4ac>0$.



              Solution:



              First, observe that the hypothesis implies $(a+b)c<-c ^2$ and that $cneq 0$.
              Then form the matrix
              $$M = left( begin{array}{cc}
              2c & b \
              b & 2a \
              end{array}right)$$

              whose determinant is precicely $4ac-b^2$, and the matrix
              $$ S = left( begin{array}{cc}
              1 & 0 \
              2 & 1 \
              end{array}right)$$

              whose determinant is $1$. Now from the multiplicativity of the determinant $det(SM) =det(S)det(M)=det(M)$. But
              $$det(SM) = det
              left( begin{array}{cc}
              2c & b \
              4c+b & 2(a+b) \
              end{array}right) = 4c(a+b) - b^2-4bc.$$



              But recall that $c(a+b)<-c^2$ so $$4c(a+b)-b^2-4bc < -4c^2-b^2 -4bc = -(b+2c)^2.$$
              The last element is always non-positive and the inequality is strict, so $det(M)=4ac-b^2<0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                $b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
                $endgroup$
                – Martin R
                Nov 23 '18 at 22:11










              • $begingroup$
                @MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
                $endgroup$
                – guest
                Nov 23 '18 at 22:12
















              6












              6








              6





              $begingroup$

              Here is a proof that works for any ordered commutative ring:



              Let $a,b,c$ be rationals, reals or elements of any non-trivial ordered commutative ring. Assume that $(a+b+c)c<0$. We show that $b^2-4ac>0$.



              Solution:



              First, observe that the hypothesis implies $(a+b)c<-c ^2$ and that $cneq 0$.
              Then form the matrix
              $$M = left( begin{array}{cc}
              2c & b \
              b & 2a \
              end{array}right)$$

              whose determinant is precicely $4ac-b^2$, and the matrix
              $$ S = left( begin{array}{cc}
              1 & 0 \
              2 & 1 \
              end{array}right)$$

              whose determinant is $1$. Now from the multiplicativity of the determinant $det(SM) =det(S)det(M)=det(M)$. But
              $$det(SM) = det
              left( begin{array}{cc}
              2c & b \
              4c+b & 2(a+b) \
              end{array}right) = 4c(a+b) - b^2-4bc.$$



              But recall that $c(a+b)<-c^2$ so $$4c(a+b)-b^2-4bc < -4c^2-b^2 -4bc = -(b+2c)^2.$$
              The last element is always non-positive and the inequality is strict, so $det(M)=4ac-b^2<0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Here is a proof that works for any ordered commutative ring:



              Let $a,b,c$ be rationals, reals or elements of any non-trivial ordered commutative ring. Assume that $(a+b+c)c<0$. We show that $b^2-4ac>0$.



              Solution:



              First, observe that the hypothesis implies $(a+b)c<-c ^2$ and that $cneq 0$.
              Then form the matrix
              $$M = left( begin{array}{cc}
              2c & b \
              b & 2a \
              end{array}right)$$

              whose determinant is precicely $4ac-b^2$, and the matrix
              $$ S = left( begin{array}{cc}
              1 & 0 \
              2 & 1 \
              end{array}right)$$

              whose determinant is $1$. Now from the multiplicativity of the determinant $det(SM) =det(S)det(M)=det(M)$. But
              $$det(SM) = det
              left( begin{array}{cc}
              2c & b \
              4c+b & 2(a+b) \
              end{array}right) = 4c(a+b) - b^2-4bc.$$



              But recall that $c(a+b)<-c^2$ so $$4c(a+b)-b^2-4bc < -4c^2-b^2 -4bc = -(b+2c)^2.$$
              The last element is always non-positive and the inequality is strict, so $det(M)=4ac-b^2<0$.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Nov 23 '18 at 21:55









              guestguest

              4,232919




              4,232919












              • $begingroup$
                $b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
                $endgroup$
                – Martin R
                Nov 23 '18 at 22:11










              • $begingroup$
                @MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
                $endgroup$
                – guest
                Nov 23 '18 at 22:12




















              • $begingroup$
                $b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
                $endgroup$
                – Martin R
                Nov 23 '18 at 22:11










              • $begingroup$
                @MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
                $endgroup$
                – guest
                Nov 23 '18 at 22:12


















              $begingroup$
              $b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
              $endgroup$
              – Martin R
              Nov 23 '18 at 22:11




              $begingroup$
              $b^2-4ac = (b+2c)^2 - 4(a+b+c)c > 0$ can be verified directly, without using determinants.
              $endgroup$
              – Martin R
              Nov 23 '18 at 22:11












              $begingroup$
              @MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
              $endgroup$
              – guest
              Nov 23 '18 at 22:12






              $begingroup$
              @MartinR thanks! I am just showing how I arrived at the inequality :) Please post this as an answer so I will accept it.
              $endgroup$
              – guest
              Nov 23 '18 at 22:12













              3












              $begingroup$

              If all you know is completing the square:



              Suppose $b^2-4acleq0$. Then we know the quadratic $ax^2+bx+c$ has at most one real root.



              By completing the square we can rewrite $ax^2+bx+c=aleft(left(x+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2right)$ for some real $d$.



              We have $c=frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2$. Returning to the original expression, complete all the squares:



              $$begin{align}(a+b+c)c&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)left(frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)\
              &=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)frac{b^2}{4a}+left(ad^2frac{b^2}{4a}+left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)ad^2right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
              &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{a}+frac{b^2}{4a^2}right)+d^2left(a^2+ab+frac{b^2}{2}right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
              &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2left(a+frac{b}{2}right)^2+left(ad^2right)^2\
              &geq0text{.}
              end{align}$$

              Thus by contrapositive, $(a+b+c)c<0,Rightarrow, b^2-4ac>0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                3












                $begingroup$

                If all you know is completing the square:



                Suppose $b^2-4acleq0$. Then we know the quadratic $ax^2+bx+c$ has at most one real root.



                By completing the square we can rewrite $ax^2+bx+c=aleft(left(x+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2right)$ for some real $d$.



                We have $c=frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2$. Returning to the original expression, complete all the squares:



                $$begin{align}(a+b+c)c&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)left(frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)\
                &=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)frac{b^2}{4a}+left(ad^2frac{b^2}{4a}+left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)ad^2right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
                &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{a}+frac{b^2}{4a^2}right)+d^2left(a^2+ab+frac{b^2}{2}right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
                &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2left(a+frac{b}{2}right)^2+left(ad^2right)^2\
                &geq0text{.}
                end{align}$$

                Thus by contrapositive, $(a+b+c)c<0,Rightarrow, b^2-4ac>0$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  If all you know is completing the square:



                  Suppose $b^2-4acleq0$. Then we know the quadratic $ax^2+bx+c$ has at most one real root.



                  By completing the square we can rewrite $ax^2+bx+c=aleft(left(x+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2right)$ for some real $d$.



                  We have $c=frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2$. Returning to the original expression, complete all the squares:



                  $$begin{align}(a+b+c)c&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)left(frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)\
                  &=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)frac{b^2}{4a}+left(ad^2frac{b^2}{4a}+left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)ad^2right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
                  &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{a}+frac{b^2}{4a^2}right)+d^2left(a^2+ab+frac{b^2}{2}right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
                  &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2left(a+frac{b}{2}right)^2+left(ad^2right)^2\
                  &geq0text{.}
                  end{align}$$

                  Thus by contrapositive, $(a+b+c)c<0,Rightarrow, b^2-4ac>0$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  If all you know is completing the square:



                  Suppose $b^2-4acleq0$. Then we know the quadratic $ax^2+bx+c$ has at most one real root.



                  By completing the square we can rewrite $ax^2+bx+c=aleft(left(x+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2right)$ for some real $d$.



                  We have $c=frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2$. Returning to the original expression, complete all the squares:



                  $$begin{align}(a+b+c)c&=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)left(frac{b^2}{4a}+ad^2right)\
                  &=left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)frac{b^2}{4a}+left(ad^2frac{b^2}{4a}+left(a+b+frac{b^2}{4a}right)ad^2right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
                  &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{a}+frac{b^2}{4a^2}right)+d^2left(a^2+ab+frac{b^2}{2}right)+left(ad^2right)^2\
                  &=frac{b^2}{4}left(1+frac{b}{2a}right)^2+d^2left(a+frac{b}{2}right)^2+left(ad^2right)^2\
                  &geq0text{.}
                  end{align}$$

                  Thus by contrapositive, $(a+b+c)c<0,Rightarrow, b^2-4ac>0$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 24 '18 at 0:58









                  obscuransobscurans

                  898311




                  898311























                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      Here's a silly proof deriving a contradiction from assuming that $(a + b + c)c lt 0 $ and $b^2-4ac le 0$ are simultaneously true.



                      1) By assumption



                      $$ (a + b + c) c lt 0 $$



                      2) Negation of goal: $ b^2 - 4ac gt 0$



                      $$ b^2 - 4ac le 0 $$



                      3) From 2 by addition



                      $$ b^2 le 4ac $$



                      4) expand 1



                      $$ ac + bc + c^2 < 0 $$



                      5) From 4 by addition



                      $$ ac < -bc - c^2 $$



                      6) From 5 by multiplication



                      $$ 4ac < -4bc -4c^2 $$



                      7) transitivity $x le y lt z$ implies $x lt z$



                      $$ b^2 lt -4bc - 4c^2 $$



                      8) from 7 by addition.



                      $$ b^2 + 4bc + 4c^2 lt 0 $$



                      9) (7) is a perfect square



                      $$ (b + 2c)^2 < 0 $$



                      10) By assumption, $a, b, c in mathbb{R}$, so the square of $(b + 2c)$ cannot be negative.



                      $$ bot $$



                      Therefore, $b^2 - 4ac gt 0$ .






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$


















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        Here's a silly proof deriving a contradiction from assuming that $(a + b + c)c lt 0 $ and $b^2-4ac le 0$ are simultaneously true.



                        1) By assumption



                        $$ (a + b + c) c lt 0 $$



                        2) Negation of goal: $ b^2 - 4ac gt 0$



                        $$ b^2 - 4ac le 0 $$



                        3) From 2 by addition



                        $$ b^2 le 4ac $$



                        4) expand 1



                        $$ ac + bc + c^2 < 0 $$



                        5) From 4 by addition



                        $$ ac < -bc - c^2 $$



                        6) From 5 by multiplication



                        $$ 4ac < -4bc -4c^2 $$



                        7) transitivity $x le y lt z$ implies $x lt z$



                        $$ b^2 lt -4bc - 4c^2 $$



                        8) from 7 by addition.



                        $$ b^2 + 4bc + 4c^2 lt 0 $$



                        9) (7) is a perfect square



                        $$ (b + 2c)^2 < 0 $$



                        10) By assumption, $a, b, c in mathbb{R}$, so the square of $(b + 2c)$ cannot be negative.



                        $$ bot $$



                        Therefore, $b^2 - 4ac gt 0$ .






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$
















                          2












                          2








                          2





                          $begingroup$

                          Here's a silly proof deriving a contradiction from assuming that $(a + b + c)c lt 0 $ and $b^2-4ac le 0$ are simultaneously true.



                          1) By assumption



                          $$ (a + b + c) c lt 0 $$



                          2) Negation of goal: $ b^2 - 4ac gt 0$



                          $$ b^2 - 4ac le 0 $$



                          3) From 2 by addition



                          $$ b^2 le 4ac $$



                          4) expand 1



                          $$ ac + bc + c^2 < 0 $$



                          5) From 4 by addition



                          $$ ac < -bc - c^2 $$



                          6) From 5 by multiplication



                          $$ 4ac < -4bc -4c^2 $$



                          7) transitivity $x le y lt z$ implies $x lt z$



                          $$ b^2 lt -4bc - 4c^2 $$



                          8) from 7 by addition.



                          $$ b^2 + 4bc + 4c^2 lt 0 $$



                          9) (7) is a perfect square



                          $$ (b + 2c)^2 < 0 $$



                          10) By assumption, $a, b, c in mathbb{R}$, so the square of $(b + 2c)$ cannot be negative.



                          $$ bot $$



                          Therefore, $b^2 - 4ac gt 0$ .






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          Here's a silly proof deriving a contradiction from assuming that $(a + b + c)c lt 0 $ and $b^2-4ac le 0$ are simultaneously true.



                          1) By assumption



                          $$ (a + b + c) c lt 0 $$



                          2) Negation of goal: $ b^2 - 4ac gt 0$



                          $$ b^2 - 4ac le 0 $$



                          3) From 2 by addition



                          $$ b^2 le 4ac $$



                          4) expand 1



                          $$ ac + bc + c^2 < 0 $$



                          5) From 4 by addition



                          $$ ac < -bc - c^2 $$



                          6) From 5 by multiplication



                          $$ 4ac < -4bc -4c^2 $$



                          7) transitivity $x le y lt z$ implies $x lt z$



                          $$ b^2 lt -4bc - 4c^2 $$



                          8) from 7 by addition.



                          $$ b^2 + 4bc + 4c^2 lt 0 $$



                          9) (7) is a perfect square



                          $$ (b + 2c)^2 < 0 $$



                          10) By assumption, $a, b, c in mathbb{R}$, so the square of $(b + 2c)$ cannot be negative.



                          $$ bot $$



                          Therefore, $b^2 - 4ac gt 0$ .







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited Dec 27 '18 at 2:10

























                          answered Nov 24 '18 at 2:53









                          Gregory NisbetGregory Nisbet

                          561312




                          561312






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010886%2falternative-proof-that-if-a-b-c-in-mathbbr-and-abcc0-then-b2-4ac%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                              ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                              Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?