Aliasing - Nyquist frequency












0












$begingroup$


According to Wolfram



"
in order to recover all Fourier components of a periodic waveform, it is necessary to use a sampling rate $nu$ at least twice textit{highest} waveform frequency. The Nyquist frequency, also called the Nyquist limit is the highest frequency that can be coded ata a given sampling rate in order to tbe able to fully reconstruct the signal, i.e.,



$$
f_{text{Nyquist}} = frac{1}{2}v
$$

"



Here what I don't understand: how can this equality be true when you have a frequency (e.g. with unit Hz) on one side and a velocity (e.g. with using m/s) on the other side of the equation?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    According to Wolfram



    "
    in order to recover all Fourier components of a periodic waveform, it is necessary to use a sampling rate $nu$ at least twice textit{highest} waveform frequency. The Nyquist frequency, also called the Nyquist limit is the highest frequency that can be coded ata a given sampling rate in order to tbe able to fully reconstruct the signal, i.e.,



    $$
    f_{text{Nyquist}} = frac{1}{2}v
    $$

    "



    Here what I don't understand: how can this equality be true when you have a frequency (e.g. with unit Hz) on one side and a velocity (e.g. with using m/s) on the other side of the equation?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      According to Wolfram



      "
      in order to recover all Fourier components of a periodic waveform, it is necessary to use a sampling rate $nu$ at least twice textit{highest} waveform frequency. The Nyquist frequency, also called the Nyquist limit is the highest frequency that can be coded ata a given sampling rate in order to tbe able to fully reconstruct the signal, i.e.,



      $$
      f_{text{Nyquist}} = frac{1}{2}v
      $$

      "



      Here what I don't understand: how can this equality be true when you have a frequency (e.g. with unit Hz) on one side and a velocity (e.g. with using m/s) on the other side of the equation?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      According to Wolfram



      "
      in order to recover all Fourier components of a periodic waveform, it is necessary to use a sampling rate $nu$ at least twice textit{highest} waveform frequency. The Nyquist frequency, also called the Nyquist limit is the highest frequency that can be coded ata a given sampling rate in order to tbe able to fully reconstruct the signal, i.e.,



      $$
      f_{text{Nyquist}} = frac{1}{2}v
      $$

      "



      Here what I don't understand: how can this equality be true when you have a frequency (e.g. with unit Hz) on one side and a velocity (e.g. with using m/s) on the other side of the equation?







      fourier-analysis fourier-series signal-processing






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 24 '18 at 11:08









      ecjbecjb

      1618




      1618






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Sampling rate ν is also in Hz. It is the number of observations per second - the rate at which you are sampling data.



          Both sides of the equation are in the same units. Hertz.



          And that’s a Greek letter ν (nu), not an English letter v.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011420%2faliasing-nyquist-frequency%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Sampling rate ν is also in Hz. It is the number of observations per second - the rate at which you are sampling data.



            Both sides of the equation are in the same units. Hertz.



            And that’s a Greek letter ν (nu), not an English letter v.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              Sampling rate ν is also in Hz. It is the number of observations per second - the rate at which you are sampling data.



              Both sides of the equation are in the same units. Hertz.



              And that’s a Greek letter ν (nu), not an English letter v.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                Sampling rate ν is also in Hz. It is the number of observations per second - the rate at which you are sampling data.



                Both sides of the equation are in the same units. Hertz.



                And that’s a Greek letter ν (nu), not an English letter v.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Sampling rate ν is also in Hz. It is the number of observations per second - the rate at which you are sampling data.



                Both sides of the equation are in the same units. Hertz.



                And that’s a Greek letter ν (nu), not an English letter v.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 24 '18 at 11:51









                ip6ip6

                54839




                54839






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011420%2faliasing-nyquist-frequency%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                    ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                    Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?