Iron based life
$begingroup$
Lately I have been thinking about possible forms of life on planets that would have radically different experiences than here on Earth. I was wondering if life based on transition metals was possible at all, with iron being probably the easiest to consider. I've always found the idea of metallic lifeforms very interesting even though I know there are obvious troubles that come with it.
Let's imagine this was a solar system with quite high concentrations of iron, nickel, cobalt, chromium, manganese, copper, and similar. Not so high to be implausible but high enough to be considered very metal rich by observers.
Thank you to those who answer.
science-based biology biochemistry metals life
asked Jan 14 at 5:09
ShroomZedShroomZed
261
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lately I have been thinking about possible forms of life on planets that would have radically different experiences than here on Earth. I was wondering if life based on transition metals was possible at all, with iron being probably the easiest to consider. I've always found the idea of metallic lifeforms very interesting even though I know there are obvious troubles that come with it.
Let's imagine this was a solar system with quite high concentrations of iron, nickel, cobalt, chromium, manganese, copper, and similar. Not so high to be implausible but high enough to be considered very metal rich by observers.
Thank you to those who answer.
science-based biology biochemistry metals life
asked Jan 14 at 5:09
ShroomZedShroomZed
261
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is hardly possible, because metals (unlike non-metals) are not able to form strong Me-Me bonds in molecules. Which means that the whole biochemistry has to be non-molecular.
$endgroup$
– Alexander
Jan 14 at 5:47
$begingroup$
Humans have an iron-based biology. It's one of the reasons why our blood is red. Do you mean iron rather than carbon as the basic chemistry? Please note that, insofar as we understand chemistry, there are precious few atoms that can take the place of carbon - iron isn't one of them. Iron-hydrogen bonds are not as numerous nor as stable as carbon-hydrogen bonds.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Jan 14 at 6:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lately I have been thinking about possible forms of life on planets that would have radically different experiences than here on Earth. I was wondering if life based on transition metals was possible at all, with iron being probably the easiest to consider. I've always found the idea of metallic lifeforms very interesting even though I know there are obvious troubles that come with it.
Let's imagine this was a solar system with quite high concentrations of iron, nickel, cobalt, chromium, manganese, copper, and similar. Not so high to be implausible but high enough to be considered very metal rich by observers.
Thank you to those who answer.
science-based biology biochemistry metals life
asked Jan 14 at 5:09
ShroomZedShroomZed
261
$endgroup$
Lately I have been thinking about possible forms of life on planets that would have radically different experiences than here on Earth. I was wondering if life based on transition metals was possible at all, with iron being probably the easiest to consider. I've always found the idea of metallic lifeforms very interesting even though I know there are obvious troubles that come with it.
Let's imagine this was a solar system with quite high concentrations of iron, nickel, cobalt, chromium, manganese, copper, and similar. Not so high to be implausible but high enough to be considered very metal rich by observers.
Thank you to those who answer.
science-based biology biochemistry metals life
science-based biology biochemistry metals life
asked Jan 14 at 5:09
ShroomZedShroomZed
261
asked Jan 14 at 5:09
ShroomZedShroomZed
261
edited Jan 14 at 5:26
ShroomZed
asked Jan 14 at 5:09
ShroomZedShroomZed
261
asked Jan 14 at 5:09
ShroomZedShroomZed
261
asked Jan 14 at 5:09
ShroomZedShroomZed
261
261
$begingroup$
This is hardly possible, because metals (unlike non-metals) are not able to form strong Me-Me bonds in molecules. Which means that the whole biochemistry has to be non-molecular.
$endgroup$
– Alexander
Jan 14 at 5:47
$begingroup$
Humans have an iron-based biology. It's one of the reasons why our blood is red. Do you mean iron rather than carbon as the basic chemistry? Please note that, insofar as we understand chemistry, there are precious few atoms that can take the place of carbon - iron isn't one of them. Iron-hydrogen bonds are not as numerous nor as stable as carbon-hydrogen bonds.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Jan 14 at 6:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is hardly possible, because metals (unlike non-metals) are not able to form strong Me-Me bonds in molecules. Which means that the whole biochemistry has to be non-molecular.
$endgroup$
– Alexander
Jan 14 at 5:47
$begingroup$
Humans have an iron-based biology. It's one of the reasons why our blood is red. Do you mean iron rather than carbon as the basic chemistry? Please note that, insofar as we understand chemistry, there are precious few atoms that can take the place of carbon - iron isn't one of them. Iron-hydrogen bonds are not as numerous nor as stable as carbon-hydrogen bonds.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Jan 14 at 6:15
$begingroup$
This is hardly possible, because metals (unlike non-metals) are not able to form strong Me-Me bonds in molecules. Which means that the whole biochemistry has to be non-molecular.
$endgroup$
– Alexander
Jan 14 at 5:47
$begingroup$
This is hardly possible, because metals (unlike non-metals) are not able to form strong Me-Me bonds in molecules. Which means that the whole biochemistry has to be non-molecular.
$endgroup$
– Alexander
Jan 14 at 5:47
$begingroup$
Humans have an iron-based biology. It's one of the reasons why our blood is red. Do you mean iron rather than carbon as the basic chemistry? Please note that, insofar as we understand chemistry, there are precious few atoms that can take the place of carbon - iron isn't one of them. Iron-hydrogen bonds are not as numerous nor as stable as carbon-hydrogen bonds.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Jan 14 at 6:15
$begingroup$
Humans have an iron-based biology. It's one of the reasons why our blood is red. Do you mean iron rather than carbon as the basic chemistry? Please note that, insofar as we understand chemistry, there are precious few atoms that can take the place of carbon - iron isn't one of them. Iron-hydrogen bonds are not as numerous nor as stable as carbon-hydrogen bonds.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Jan 14 at 6:15
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It's certainly possible but it's also unlikely because of a chemical property called Valency. Put simply, carbon makes a great basis for organic compounds because it's naturally tetravalent, or in other words can combine with 4 other elements or atoms to form new molecules. This means that you can quickly build very complex molecules with substantially different properties from each other, just sticking with a few common elements.
CHNO (Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen, Oxygen) compounds are the basis of complex life on Earth and from these we get carbohydrates, LSD, alcohol, caffeine, morphine, and many other types of compounds that when used within a complex lifeform, have massively different effects.
Iron is at best trivalent, as I understand it usually bivalent, meaning it doesn't quite have the same ability to build complex organic molecules as carbon. If it could, we'd probably be iron based life forms because iron is more plentiful in our environment than carbon is.
Also, because iron oxidises VERY well, it may well restrict the capacity of the lifeforms to metabolise and oxidise because any oxygen that comes near the iron in the lifeform is likely to be trapped exceedingly well. This is in fact how our hemoglobin works to get oxygen through our bodies right now. If the entire lifeform was iron based, it may not be as efficient at getting oxygen to all parts of it.
This is one of the key reasons why silicon is generally seen as the most likely candidate for alternative biochemistry, although it's not as prevalent as carbon. Another possibility might be Chromium (because in certain conditions it can be hexavalent), but that would be even more exotic a lifeform to form and it is difficult to imagine how it might work.
So possible? Yes. Practically possible? Probably not, at least not if you want complex diverse life on your planet.
edited Jan 14 at 5:31
Renan
46.5k11109236
answered Jan 14 at 5:28
Tim B IITim B II
27k659113
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Witness me, Shiny and Chromium!!!
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
Jan 14 at 10:41
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136499%2firon-based-life%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It's certainly possible but it's also unlikely because of a chemical property called Valency. Put simply, carbon makes a great basis for organic compounds because it's naturally tetravalent, or in other words can combine with 4 other elements or atoms to form new molecules. This means that you can quickly build very complex molecules with substantially different properties from each other, just sticking with a few common elements.
CHNO (Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen, Oxygen) compounds are the basis of complex life on Earth and from these we get carbohydrates, LSD, alcohol, caffeine, morphine, and many other types of compounds that when used within a complex lifeform, have massively different effects.
Iron is at best trivalent, as I understand it usually bivalent, meaning it doesn't quite have the same ability to build complex organic molecules as carbon. If it could, we'd probably be iron based life forms because iron is more plentiful in our environment than carbon is.
Also, because iron oxidises VERY well, it may well restrict the capacity of the lifeforms to metabolise and oxidise because any oxygen that comes near the iron in the lifeform is likely to be trapped exceedingly well. This is in fact how our hemoglobin works to get oxygen through our bodies right now. If the entire lifeform was iron based, it may not be as efficient at getting oxygen to all parts of it.
This is one of the key reasons why silicon is generally seen as the most likely candidate for alternative biochemistry, although it's not as prevalent as carbon. Another possibility might be Chromium (because in certain conditions it can be hexavalent), but that would be even more exotic a lifeform to form and it is difficult to imagine how it might work.
So possible? Yes. Practically possible? Probably not, at least not if you want complex diverse life on your planet.
edited Jan 14 at 5:31
Renan
46.5k11109236
answered Jan 14 at 5:28
Tim B IITim B II
27k659113
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Witness me, Shiny and Chromium!!!
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
Jan 14 at 10:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's certainly possible but it's also unlikely because of a chemical property called Valency. Put simply, carbon makes a great basis for organic compounds because it's naturally tetravalent, or in other words can combine with 4 other elements or atoms to form new molecules. This means that you can quickly build very complex molecules with substantially different properties from each other, just sticking with a few common elements.
CHNO (Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen, Oxygen) compounds are the basis of complex life on Earth and from these we get carbohydrates, LSD, alcohol, caffeine, morphine, and many other types of compounds that when used within a complex lifeform, have massively different effects.
Iron is at best trivalent, as I understand it usually bivalent, meaning it doesn't quite have the same ability to build complex organic molecules as carbon. If it could, we'd probably be iron based life forms because iron is more plentiful in our environment than carbon is.
Also, because iron oxidises VERY well, it may well restrict the capacity of the lifeforms to metabolise and oxidise because any oxygen that comes near the iron in the lifeform is likely to be trapped exceedingly well. This is in fact how our hemoglobin works to get oxygen through our bodies right now. If the entire lifeform was iron based, it may not be as efficient at getting oxygen to all parts of it.
This is one of the key reasons why silicon is generally seen as the most likely candidate for alternative biochemistry, although it's not as prevalent as carbon. Another possibility might be Chromium (because in certain conditions it can be hexavalent), but that would be even more exotic a lifeform to form and it is difficult to imagine how it might work.
So possible? Yes. Practically possible? Probably not, at least not if you want complex diverse life on your planet.
edited Jan 14 at 5:31
Renan
46.5k11109236
answered Jan 14 at 5:28
Tim B IITim B II
27k659113
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Witness me, Shiny and Chromium!!!
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
Jan 14 at 10:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's certainly possible but it's also unlikely because of a chemical property called Valency. Put simply, carbon makes a great basis for organic compounds because it's naturally tetravalent, or in other words can combine with 4 other elements or atoms to form new molecules. This means that you can quickly build very complex molecules with substantially different properties from each other, just sticking with a few common elements.
CHNO (Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen, Oxygen) compounds are the basis of complex life on Earth and from these we get carbohydrates, LSD, alcohol, caffeine, morphine, and many other types of compounds that when used within a complex lifeform, have massively different effects.
Iron is at best trivalent, as I understand it usually bivalent, meaning it doesn't quite have the same ability to build complex organic molecules as carbon. If it could, we'd probably be iron based life forms because iron is more plentiful in our environment than carbon is.
Also, because iron oxidises VERY well, it may well restrict the capacity of the lifeforms to metabolise and oxidise because any oxygen that comes near the iron in the lifeform is likely to be trapped exceedingly well. This is in fact how our hemoglobin works to get oxygen through our bodies right now. If the entire lifeform was iron based, it may not be as efficient at getting oxygen to all parts of it.
This is one of the key reasons why silicon is generally seen as the most likely candidate for alternative biochemistry, although it's not as prevalent as carbon. Another possibility might be Chromium (because in certain conditions it can be hexavalent), but that would be even more exotic a lifeform to form and it is difficult to imagine how it might work.
So possible? Yes. Practically possible? Probably not, at least not if you want complex diverse life on your planet.
edited Jan 14 at 5:31
Renan
46.5k11109236
answered Jan 14 at 5:28
Tim B IITim B II
27k659113
$endgroup$
It's certainly possible but it's also unlikely because of a chemical property called Valency. Put simply, carbon makes a great basis for organic compounds because it's naturally tetravalent, or in other words can combine with 4 other elements or atoms to form new molecules. This means that you can quickly build very complex molecules with substantially different properties from each other, just sticking with a few common elements.
CHNO (Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen, Oxygen) compounds are the basis of complex life on Earth and from these we get carbohydrates, LSD, alcohol, caffeine, morphine, and many other types of compounds that when used within a complex lifeform, have massively different effects.
Iron is at best trivalent, as I understand it usually bivalent, meaning it doesn't quite have the same ability to build complex organic molecules as carbon. If it could, we'd probably be iron based life forms because iron is more plentiful in our environment than carbon is.
Also, because iron oxidises VERY well, it may well restrict the capacity of the lifeforms to metabolise and oxidise because any oxygen that comes near the iron in the lifeform is likely to be trapped exceedingly well. This is in fact how our hemoglobin works to get oxygen through our bodies right now. If the entire lifeform was iron based, it may not be as efficient at getting oxygen to all parts of it.
This is one of the key reasons why silicon is generally seen as the most likely candidate for alternative biochemistry, although it's not as prevalent as carbon. Another possibility might be Chromium (because in certain conditions it can be hexavalent), but that would be even more exotic a lifeform to form and it is difficult to imagine how it might work.
So possible? Yes. Practically possible? Probably not, at least not if you want complex diverse life on your planet.
edited Jan 14 at 5:31
Renan
46.5k11109236
answered Jan 14 at 5:28
Tim B IITim B II
27k659113
edited Jan 14 at 5:31
Renan
46.5k11109236
edited Jan 14 at 5:31
Renan
46.5k11109236
edited Jan 14 at 5:31
Renan
46.5k11109236
46.5k11109236
answered Jan 14 at 5:28
Tim B IITim B II
27k659113
answered Jan 14 at 5:28
Tim B IITim B II
27k659113
answered Jan 14 at 5:28
Tim B IITim B II
27k659113
27k659113
2
$begingroup$
Witness me, Shiny and Chromium!!!
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
Jan 14 at 10:41
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Witness me, Shiny and Chromium!!!
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
Jan 14 at 10:41
2
2
$begingroup$
Witness me, Shiny and Chromium!!!
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
Jan 14 at 10:41
$begingroup$
Witness me, Shiny and Chromium!!!
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
Jan 14 at 10:41
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136499%2firon-based-life%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
This is hardly possible, because metals (unlike non-metals) are not able to form strong Me-Me bonds in molecules. Which means that the whole biochemistry has to be non-molecular.
$endgroup$
– Alexander
Jan 14 at 5:47
$begingroup$
Humans have an iron-based biology. It's one of the reasons why our blood is red. Do you mean iron rather than carbon as the basic chemistry? Please note that, insofar as we understand chemistry, there are precious few atoms that can take the place of carbon - iron isn't one of them. Iron-hydrogen bonds are not as numerous nor as stable as carbon-hydrogen bonds.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Jan 14 at 6:15