Compute the flow $Phi_t$ of $mathbb{X}(x,y)=(y,x)$












2












$begingroup$


Let $mathbb{X}$ be the vector field on $mathbb{R}^2$ given by $$ mathbb{X}(x,y) = (y,x). $$ Compute the flow $Phi_t$ of
$mathbb{X}$



I was reading through an answer on math.stackexchange entitled "Finding the flow of a pushforward of vector field" and the first part of his problem was this question.



The solution he gave was $Phi_t(x,y)=(frac{x+y}{2}e^t+frac{y-x}{2}e^{-t},frac{x+y}{2}e^t +frac{x-y}{2}e^{-t})$



My understanding is that to calculate the flow, you consider: $Phi_t(x,y)=(dot{x},dot{y})=(y,x)$ and try to solve.



Why cant the flow be $Phi(x,y)=((y-x)e^{-t},(x-y)e^{-t})$?



It is probably a problem with definitions, but any help would be greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    Let $mathbb{X}$ be the vector field on $mathbb{R}^2$ given by $$ mathbb{X}(x,y) = (y,x). $$ Compute the flow $Phi_t$ of
    $mathbb{X}$



    I was reading through an answer on math.stackexchange entitled "Finding the flow of a pushforward of vector field" and the first part of his problem was this question.



    The solution he gave was $Phi_t(x,y)=(frac{x+y}{2}e^t+frac{y-x}{2}e^{-t},frac{x+y}{2}e^t +frac{x-y}{2}e^{-t})$



    My understanding is that to calculate the flow, you consider: $Phi_t(x,y)=(dot{x},dot{y})=(y,x)$ and try to solve.



    Why cant the flow be $Phi(x,y)=((y-x)e^{-t},(x-y)e^{-t})$?



    It is probably a problem with definitions, but any help would be greatly appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2


      2



      $begingroup$


      Let $mathbb{X}$ be the vector field on $mathbb{R}^2$ given by $$ mathbb{X}(x,y) = (y,x). $$ Compute the flow $Phi_t$ of
      $mathbb{X}$



      I was reading through an answer on math.stackexchange entitled "Finding the flow of a pushforward of vector field" and the first part of his problem was this question.



      The solution he gave was $Phi_t(x,y)=(frac{x+y}{2}e^t+frac{y-x}{2}e^{-t},frac{x+y}{2}e^t +frac{x-y}{2}e^{-t})$



      My understanding is that to calculate the flow, you consider: $Phi_t(x,y)=(dot{x},dot{y})=(y,x)$ and try to solve.



      Why cant the flow be $Phi(x,y)=((y-x)e^{-t},(x-y)e^{-t})$?



      It is probably a problem with definitions, but any help would be greatly appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $mathbb{X}$ be the vector field on $mathbb{R}^2$ given by $$ mathbb{X}(x,y) = (y,x). $$ Compute the flow $Phi_t$ of
      $mathbb{X}$



      I was reading through an answer on math.stackexchange entitled "Finding the flow of a pushforward of vector field" and the first part of his problem was this question.



      The solution he gave was $Phi_t(x,y)=(frac{x+y}{2}e^t+frac{y-x}{2}e^{-t},frac{x+y}{2}e^t +frac{x-y}{2}e^{-t})$



      My understanding is that to calculate the flow, you consider: $Phi_t(x,y)=(dot{x},dot{y})=(y,x)$ and try to solve.



      Why cant the flow be $Phi(x,y)=((y-x)e^{-t},(x-y)e^{-t})$?



      It is probably a problem with definitions, but any help would be greatly appreciated.







      calculus ordinary-differential-equations derivatives






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 27 '14 at 21:02









      Sam HoustonSam Houston

      1,2141132




      1,2141132






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          No, it is not a problem with definition.



          Hint. The flow of the linear vector field $Az$ is given by its matrix exponent $e^{tA}z$. In your case
          $$
          A=begin{bmatrix}
          0&1\
          1&0
          end{bmatrix}
          $$
          and $z=(x,y)^top$. Hence you need to calculate
          $$
          e^{tA}
          $$
          and see the result.



          Addition.



          There are different methods to calculate $e^{tA}$, but here I can use simply the defintion
          $$
          e^{tA}=I+tA+frac{t^2}{2!}A^2+ldots
          $$
          Simply by noting that $A^2=I$ I find
          $$
          e^{tA}=begin{bmatrix}
          1+frac{t^2}{2!}+frac{t^4}{4!}+ldots& t+frac{t^3}{3!}+ldots\
          t+frac{t^3}{3!}+ldots&1+frac{t^2}{2!}+frac{t^4}{4!}+ldots
          end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}
          cosh t&sinh t\
          sinh t&cosh t
          end{bmatrix},
          $$
          where, as usual,
          $$
          cosh t=frac{e^t+e^{-t}}{2},quad sinh t=frac{e^t-e^{-t}}{2}.
          $$
          Now you can see you flow by multiplying $e^{tA}$ by the vector of initial conditions.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            yes I remember reading that, thanks for the help, will give it another go
            $endgroup$
            – Sam Houston
            Dec 27 '14 at 21:15










          • $begingroup$
            Another hint to see where you are a little confused: not every solution to the system of ODE will give you the flow. Only those, where you can simply replace two arbitrary constants with two initial conditions.
            $endgroup$
            – Artem
            Dec 27 '14 at 21:16






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Dansmith I am not sure that I can give you an ultimate reference. The flows of linear constant coefficients vector fields are linear transformation groups defined simply by $e^{tA}$. There is not much to learn here. Try Arnold's ODE, if you can get through his deceivably easy-to-understand writings, you will learn the general theory of flows, transformation groups, and vector fieleds.
            $endgroup$
            – Artem
            Dec 27 '14 at 21:24






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Did you hear about the matrix exponent?
            $endgroup$
            – Artem
            Dec 27 '14 at 22:37






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            See the addition. If you cannot get through it, you should start with the book I advised you.
            $endgroup$
            – Artem
            Dec 27 '14 at 23:14



















          0












          $begingroup$

          Another way to see this result without needing to use the exponential map is the following:



          For $Y = xfrac{partial}{partial y} + yfrac{partial}{ partial x}$ we obtain the differential equations $x'(t) = y$ and $y'(t) = x$. We note that differentiating either of the equations gives us that $y''(t)=y(t)$ and similarly for $x(t)$. We know that the general solution to each of these equations is $y(t)= d_1e^t +d_2e^{-t}$ and $x(t) = c_1e^t +c_2e^{-t}$. Now our global flow must satisfy $x(0)=y$ and $y(0)=x$, and thus we impose the conditions that $c_1 +c_2 =y$ and $d_1+d_2 =x$. Now given that $x'(t) = y(t)$ we have the following relationship between coefficients: $c_1=d_1$ and $c_2 =-d_2$. Plugging these in to the system of equations above and solving for $c_1$ and $c_2$ we obtain that $c_1 = frac{x+y}{2}$, and $c_2 = frac{y-x}{2}$. Thus our flow becomes $theta_t(x, y) = (frac{x+y}{2}e^t + frac{y-x}{2}e^{-t}, frac{x+y}{2}e^t-frac{y-x}{2}e^{-t})$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1082792%2fcompute-the-flow-phi-t-of-mathbbxx-y-y-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            No, it is not a problem with definition.



            Hint. The flow of the linear vector field $Az$ is given by its matrix exponent $e^{tA}z$. In your case
            $$
            A=begin{bmatrix}
            0&1\
            1&0
            end{bmatrix}
            $$
            and $z=(x,y)^top$. Hence you need to calculate
            $$
            e^{tA}
            $$
            and see the result.



            Addition.



            There are different methods to calculate $e^{tA}$, but here I can use simply the defintion
            $$
            e^{tA}=I+tA+frac{t^2}{2!}A^2+ldots
            $$
            Simply by noting that $A^2=I$ I find
            $$
            e^{tA}=begin{bmatrix}
            1+frac{t^2}{2!}+frac{t^4}{4!}+ldots& t+frac{t^3}{3!}+ldots\
            t+frac{t^3}{3!}+ldots&1+frac{t^2}{2!}+frac{t^4}{4!}+ldots
            end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}
            cosh t&sinh t\
            sinh t&cosh t
            end{bmatrix},
            $$
            where, as usual,
            $$
            cosh t=frac{e^t+e^{-t}}{2},quad sinh t=frac{e^t-e^{-t}}{2}.
            $$
            Now you can see you flow by multiplying $e^{tA}$ by the vector of initial conditions.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              yes I remember reading that, thanks for the help, will give it another go
              $endgroup$
              – Sam Houston
              Dec 27 '14 at 21:15










            • $begingroup$
              Another hint to see where you are a little confused: not every solution to the system of ODE will give you the flow. Only those, where you can simply replace two arbitrary constants with two initial conditions.
              $endgroup$
              – Artem
              Dec 27 '14 at 21:16






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Dansmith I am not sure that I can give you an ultimate reference. The flows of linear constant coefficients vector fields are linear transformation groups defined simply by $e^{tA}$. There is not much to learn here. Try Arnold's ODE, if you can get through his deceivably easy-to-understand writings, you will learn the general theory of flows, transformation groups, and vector fieleds.
              $endgroup$
              – Artem
              Dec 27 '14 at 21:24






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Did you hear about the matrix exponent?
              $endgroup$
              – Artem
              Dec 27 '14 at 22:37






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              See the addition. If you cannot get through it, you should start with the book I advised you.
              $endgroup$
              – Artem
              Dec 27 '14 at 23:14
















            4












            $begingroup$

            No, it is not a problem with definition.



            Hint. The flow of the linear vector field $Az$ is given by its matrix exponent $e^{tA}z$. In your case
            $$
            A=begin{bmatrix}
            0&1\
            1&0
            end{bmatrix}
            $$
            and $z=(x,y)^top$. Hence you need to calculate
            $$
            e^{tA}
            $$
            and see the result.



            Addition.



            There are different methods to calculate $e^{tA}$, but here I can use simply the defintion
            $$
            e^{tA}=I+tA+frac{t^2}{2!}A^2+ldots
            $$
            Simply by noting that $A^2=I$ I find
            $$
            e^{tA}=begin{bmatrix}
            1+frac{t^2}{2!}+frac{t^4}{4!}+ldots& t+frac{t^3}{3!}+ldots\
            t+frac{t^3}{3!}+ldots&1+frac{t^2}{2!}+frac{t^4}{4!}+ldots
            end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}
            cosh t&sinh t\
            sinh t&cosh t
            end{bmatrix},
            $$
            where, as usual,
            $$
            cosh t=frac{e^t+e^{-t}}{2},quad sinh t=frac{e^t-e^{-t}}{2}.
            $$
            Now you can see you flow by multiplying $e^{tA}$ by the vector of initial conditions.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              yes I remember reading that, thanks for the help, will give it another go
              $endgroup$
              – Sam Houston
              Dec 27 '14 at 21:15










            • $begingroup$
              Another hint to see where you are a little confused: not every solution to the system of ODE will give you the flow. Only those, where you can simply replace two arbitrary constants with two initial conditions.
              $endgroup$
              – Artem
              Dec 27 '14 at 21:16






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Dansmith I am not sure that I can give you an ultimate reference. The flows of linear constant coefficients vector fields are linear transformation groups defined simply by $e^{tA}$. There is not much to learn here. Try Arnold's ODE, if you can get through his deceivably easy-to-understand writings, you will learn the general theory of flows, transformation groups, and vector fieleds.
              $endgroup$
              – Artem
              Dec 27 '14 at 21:24






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Did you hear about the matrix exponent?
              $endgroup$
              – Artem
              Dec 27 '14 at 22:37






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              See the addition. If you cannot get through it, you should start with the book I advised you.
              $endgroup$
              – Artem
              Dec 27 '14 at 23:14














            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            No, it is not a problem with definition.



            Hint. The flow of the linear vector field $Az$ is given by its matrix exponent $e^{tA}z$. In your case
            $$
            A=begin{bmatrix}
            0&1\
            1&0
            end{bmatrix}
            $$
            and $z=(x,y)^top$. Hence you need to calculate
            $$
            e^{tA}
            $$
            and see the result.



            Addition.



            There are different methods to calculate $e^{tA}$, but here I can use simply the defintion
            $$
            e^{tA}=I+tA+frac{t^2}{2!}A^2+ldots
            $$
            Simply by noting that $A^2=I$ I find
            $$
            e^{tA}=begin{bmatrix}
            1+frac{t^2}{2!}+frac{t^4}{4!}+ldots& t+frac{t^3}{3!}+ldots\
            t+frac{t^3}{3!}+ldots&1+frac{t^2}{2!}+frac{t^4}{4!}+ldots
            end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}
            cosh t&sinh t\
            sinh t&cosh t
            end{bmatrix},
            $$
            where, as usual,
            $$
            cosh t=frac{e^t+e^{-t}}{2},quad sinh t=frac{e^t-e^{-t}}{2}.
            $$
            Now you can see you flow by multiplying $e^{tA}$ by the vector of initial conditions.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            No, it is not a problem with definition.



            Hint. The flow of the linear vector field $Az$ is given by its matrix exponent $e^{tA}z$. In your case
            $$
            A=begin{bmatrix}
            0&1\
            1&0
            end{bmatrix}
            $$
            and $z=(x,y)^top$. Hence you need to calculate
            $$
            e^{tA}
            $$
            and see the result.



            Addition.



            There are different methods to calculate $e^{tA}$, but here I can use simply the defintion
            $$
            e^{tA}=I+tA+frac{t^2}{2!}A^2+ldots
            $$
            Simply by noting that $A^2=I$ I find
            $$
            e^{tA}=begin{bmatrix}
            1+frac{t^2}{2!}+frac{t^4}{4!}+ldots& t+frac{t^3}{3!}+ldots\
            t+frac{t^3}{3!}+ldots&1+frac{t^2}{2!}+frac{t^4}{4!}+ldots
            end{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}
            cosh t&sinh t\
            sinh t&cosh t
            end{bmatrix},
            $$
            where, as usual,
            $$
            cosh t=frac{e^t+e^{-t}}{2},quad sinh t=frac{e^t-e^{-t}}{2}.
            $$
            Now you can see you flow by multiplying $e^{tA}$ by the vector of initial conditions.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Dec 27 '14 at 23:14

























            answered Dec 27 '14 at 21:13









            ArtemArtem

            11.4k32245




            11.4k32245












            • $begingroup$
              yes I remember reading that, thanks for the help, will give it another go
              $endgroup$
              – Sam Houston
              Dec 27 '14 at 21:15










            • $begingroup$
              Another hint to see where you are a little confused: not every solution to the system of ODE will give you the flow. Only those, where you can simply replace two arbitrary constants with two initial conditions.
              $endgroup$
              – Artem
              Dec 27 '14 at 21:16






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Dansmith I am not sure that I can give you an ultimate reference. The flows of linear constant coefficients vector fields are linear transformation groups defined simply by $e^{tA}$. There is not much to learn here. Try Arnold's ODE, if you can get through his deceivably easy-to-understand writings, you will learn the general theory of flows, transformation groups, and vector fieleds.
              $endgroup$
              – Artem
              Dec 27 '14 at 21:24






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Did you hear about the matrix exponent?
              $endgroup$
              – Artem
              Dec 27 '14 at 22:37






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              See the addition. If you cannot get through it, you should start with the book I advised you.
              $endgroup$
              – Artem
              Dec 27 '14 at 23:14


















            • $begingroup$
              yes I remember reading that, thanks for the help, will give it another go
              $endgroup$
              – Sam Houston
              Dec 27 '14 at 21:15










            • $begingroup$
              Another hint to see where you are a little confused: not every solution to the system of ODE will give you the flow. Only those, where you can simply replace two arbitrary constants with two initial conditions.
              $endgroup$
              – Artem
              Dec 27 '14 at 21:16






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Dansmith I am not sure that I can give you an ultimate reference. The flows of linear constant coefficients vector fields are linear transformation groups defined simply by $e^{tA}$. There is not much to learn here. Try Arnold's ODE, if you can get through his deceivably easy-to-understand writings, you will learn the general theory of flows, transformation groups, and vector fieleds.
              $endgroup$
              – Artem
              Dec 27 '14 at 21:24






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Did you hear about the matrix exponent?
              $endgroup$
              – Artem
              Dec 27 '14 at 22:37






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              See the addition. If you cannot get through it, you should start with the book I advised you.
              $endgroup$
              – Artem
              Dec 27 '14 at 23:14
















            $begingroup$
            yes I remember reading that, thanks for the help, will give it another go
            $endgroup$
            – Sam Houston
            Dec 27 '14 at 21:15




            $begingroup$
            yes I remember reading that, thanks for the help, will give it another go
            $endgroup$
            – Sam Houston
            Dec 27 '14 at 21:15












            $begingroup$
            Another hint to see where you are a little confused: not every solution to the system of ODE will give you the flow. Only those, where you can simply replace two arbitrary constants with two initial conditions.
            $endgroup$
            – Artem
            Dec 27 '14 at 21:16




            $begingroup$
            Another hint to see where you are a little confused: not every solution to the system of ODE will give you the flow. Only those, where you can simply replace two arbitrary constants with two initial conditions.
            $endgroup$
            – Artem
            Dec 27 '14 at 21:16




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            @Dansmith I am not sure that I can give you an ultimate reference. The flows of linear constant coefficients vector fields are linear transformation groups defined simply by $e^{tA}$. There is not much to learn here. Try Arnold's ODE, if you can get through his deceivably easy-to-understand writings, you will learn the general theory of flows, transformation groups, and vector fieleds.
            $endgroup$
            – Artem
            Dec 27 '14 at 21:24




            $begingroup$
            @Dansmith I am not sure that I can give you an ultimate reference. The flows of linear constant coefficients vector fields are linear transformation groups defined simply by $e^{tA}$. There is not much to learn here. Try Arnold's ODE, if you can get through his deceivably easy-to-understand writings, you will learn the general theory of flows, transformation groups, and vector fieleds.
            $endgroup$
            – Artem
            Dec 27 '14 at 21:24




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Did you hear about the matrix exponent?
            $endgroup$
            – Artem
            Dec 27 '14 at 22:37




            $begingroup$
            Did you hear about the matrix exponent?
            $endgroup$
            – Artem
            Dec 27 '14 at 22:37




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            See the addition. If you cannot get through it, you should start with the book I advised you.
            $endgroup$
            – Artem
            Dec 27 '14 at 23:14




            $begingroup$
            See the addition. If you cannot get through it, you should start with the book I advised you.
            $endgroup$
            – Artem
            Dec 27 '14 at 23:14











            0












            $begingroup$

            Another way to see this result without needing to use the exponential map is the following:



            For $Y = xfrac{partial}{partial y} + yfrac{partial}{ partial x}$ we obtain the differential equations $x'(t) = y$ and $y'(t) = x$. We note that differentiating either of the equations gives us that $y''(t)=y(t)$ and similarly for $x(t)$. We know that the general solution to each of these equations is $y(t)= d_1e^t +d_2e^{-t}$ and $x(t) = c_1e^t +c_2e^{-t}$. Now our global flow must satisfy $x(0)=y$ and $y(0)=x$, and thus we impose the conditions that $c_1 +c_2 =y$ and $d_1+d_2 =x$. Now given that $x'(t) = y(t)$ we have the following relationship between coefficients: $c_1=d_1$ and $c_2 =-d_2$. Plugging these in to the system of equations above and solving for $c_1$ and $c_2$ we obtain that $c_1 = frac{x+y}{2}$, and $c_2 = frac{y-x}{2}$. Thus our flow becomes $theta_t(x, y) = (frac{x+y}{2}e^t + frac{y-x}{2}e^{-t}, frac{x+y}{2}e^t-frac{y-x}{2}e^{-t})$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              Another way to see this result without needing to use the exponential map is the following:



              For $Y = xfrac{partial}{partial y} + yfrac{partial}{ partial x}$ we obtain the differential equations $x'(t) = y$ and $y'(t) = x$. We note that differentiating either of the equations gives us that $y''(t)=y(t)$ and similarly for $x(t)$. We know that the general solution to each of these equations is $y(t)= d_1e^t +d_2e^{-t}$ and $x(t) = c_1e^t +c_2e^{-t}$. Now our global flow must satisfy $x(0)=y$ and $y(0)=x$, and thus we impose the conditions that $c_1 +c_2 =y$ and $d_1+d_2 =x$. Now given that $x'(t) = y(t)$ we have the following relationship between coefficients: $c_1=d_1$ and $c_2 =-d_2$. Plugging these in to the system of equations above and solving for $c_1$ and $c_2$ we obtain that $c_1 = frac{x+y}{2}$, and $c_2 = frac{y-x}{2}$. Thus our flow becomes $theta_t(x, y) = (frac{x+y}{2}e^t + frac{y-x}{2}e^{-t}, frac{x+y}{2}e^t-frac{y-x}{2}e^{-t})$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Another way to see this result without needing to use the exponential map is the following:



                For $Y = xfrac{partial}{partial y} + yfrac{partial}{ partial x}$ we obtain the differential equations $x'(t) = y$ and $y'(t) = x$. We note that differentiating either of the equations gives us that $y''(t)=y(t)$ and similarly for $x(t)$. We know that the general solution to each of these equations is $y(t)= d_1e^t +d_2e^{-t}$ and $x(t) = c_1e^t +c_2e^{-t}$. Now our global flow must satisfy $x(0)=y$ and $y(0)=x$, and thus we impose the conditions that $c_1 +c_2 =y$ and $d_1+d_2 =x$. Now given that $x'(t) = y(t)$ we have the following relationship between coefficients: $c_1=d_1$ and $c_2 =-d_2$. Plugging these in to the system of equations above and solving for $c_1$ and $c_2$ we obtain that $c_1 = frac{x+y}{2}$, and $c_2 = frac{y-x}{2}$. Thus our flow becomes $theta_t(x, y) = (frac{x+y}{2}e^t + frac{y-x}{2}e^{-t}, frac{x+y}{2}e^t-frac{y-x}{2}e^{-t})$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Another way to see this result without needing to use the exponential map is the following:



                For $Y = xfrac{partial}{partial y} + yfrac{partial}{ partial x}$ we obtain the differential equations $x'(t) = y$ and $y'(t) = x$. We note that differentiating either of the equations gives us that $y''(t)=y(t)$ and similarly for $x(t)$. We know that the general solution to each of these equations is $y(t)= d_1e^t +d_2e^{-t}$ and $x(t) = c_1e^t +c_2e^{-t}$. Now our global flow must satisfy $x(0)=y$ and $y(0)=x$, and thus we impose the conditions that $c_1 +c_2 =y$ and $d_1+d_2 =x$. Now given that $x'(t) = y(t)$ we have the following relationship between coefficients: $c_1=d_1$ and $c_2 =-d_2$. Plugging these in to the system of equations above and solving for $c_1$ and $c_2$ we obtain that $c_1 = frac{x+y}{2}$, and $c_2 = frac{y-x}{2}$. Thus our flow becomes $theta_t(x, y) = (frac{x+y}{2}e^t + frac{y-x}{2}e^{-t}, frac{x+y}{2}e^t-frac{y-x}{2}e^{-t})$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 26 '18 at 4:43









                Brandon Thomas Van OverBrandon Thomas Van Over

                3,83721127




                3,83721127






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1082792%2fcompute-the-flow-phi-t-of-mathbbxx-y-y-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                    ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                    Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?