How to run tlmgr in Ubuntu
I installed TexLive from https://www.tug.org/texlive/quickinstall.html in Ubuntu 18.04.
I have tlmgr
which tlmgr
/usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux//tlmgr
I try
tlmgr install tex-gyre
and get:
You don't have permission to change the installation in any way,
specifically, the directory /usr/local/texlive/2018/tlpkg/ is not writable.
Please run this program as administrator, or contact your local admin.
tlmgr: An error has occurred. See above messages. Exiting.
Trying
sudo tlmgr install tex-gyre
I get
sudo: tlmgr: command not found
Trying sudo su first I get
Command 'tlmgr' not found, but can be installed with:
apt install texlive-base
How to perform this operation?
ubuntu tlmgr texlive-2018
asked Jan 16 at 22:25
ViestursViesturs
1,65031123
|
show 1 more comment
I installed TexLive from https://www.tug.org/texlive/quickinstall.html in Ubuntu 18.04.
I have tlmgr
which tlmgr
/usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux//tlmgr
I try
tlmgr install tex-gyre
and get:
You don't have permission to change the installation in any way,
specifically, the directory /usr/local/texlive/2018/tlpkg/ is not writable.
Please run this program as administrator, or contact your local admin.
tlmgr: An error has occurred. See above messages. Exiting.
Trying
sudo tlmgr install tex-gyre
I get
sudo: tlmgr: command not found
Trying sudo su first I get
Command 'tlmgr' not found, but can be installed with:
apt install texlive-base
How to perform this operation?
ubuntu tlmgr texlive-2018
asked Jan 16 at 22:25
ViestursViesturs
1,65031123
It is not found because it is not in the path.
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 22:30
What are the permissions of this folder? What doesls -l /usr/local/texlive/2018/say?
– samcarter
Jan 16 at 22:31
1
You can call it passing the path/usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux/tlmgr
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 22:32
I suspect that you didn't add binaries to the PATH after installed TeXlive.
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 22:33
@Sigur, adding/usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux/after doingsudo suworked
– Viesturs
Jan 16 at 22:35
|
show 1 more comment
I installed TexLive from https://www.tug.org/texlive/quickinstall.html in Ubuntu 18.04.
I have tlmgr
which tlmgr
/usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux//tlmgr
I try
tlmgr install tex-gyre
and get:
You don't have permission to change the installation in any way,
specifically, the directory /usr/local/texlive/2018/tlpkg/ is not writable.
Please run this program as administrator, or contact your local admin.
tlmgr: An error has occurred. See above messages. Exiting.
Trying
sudo tlmgr install tex-gyre
I get
sudo: tlmgr: command not found
Trying sudo su first I get
Command 'tlmgr' not found, but can be installed with:
apt install texlive-base
How to perform this operation?
ubuntu tlmgr texlive-2018
asked Jan 16 at 22:25
ViestursViesturs
1,65031123
I installed TexLive from https://www.tug.org/texlive/quickinstall.html in Ubuntu 18.04.
I have tlmgr
which tlmgr
/usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux//tlmgr
I try
tlmgr install tex-gyre
and get:
You don't have permission to change the installation in any way,
specifically, the directory /usr/local/texlive/2018/tlpkg/ is not writable.
Please run this program as administrator, or contact your local admin.
tlmgr: An error has occurred. See above messages. Exiting.
Trying
sudo tlmgr install tex-gyre
I get
sudo: tlmgr: command not found
Trying sudo su first I get
Command 'tlmgr' not found, but can be installed with:
apt install texlive-base
How to perform this operation?
ubuntu tlmgr texlive-2018
ubuntu tlmgr texlive-2018
asked Jan 16 at 22:25
ViestursViesturs
1,65031123
asked Jan 16 at 22:25
ViestursViesturs
1,65031123
edited Jan 16 at 22:29
Viesturs
asked Jan 16 at 22:25
ViestursViesturs
1,65031123
asked Jan 16 at 22:25
ViestursViesturs
1,65031123
asked Jan 16 at 22:25
ViestursViesturs
1,65031123
1,65031123
It is not found because it is not in the path.
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 22:30
What are the permissions of this folder? What doesls -l /usr/local/texlive/2018/say?
– samcarter
Jan 16 at 22:31
1
You can call it passing the path/usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux/tlmgr
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 22:32
I suspect that you didn't add binaries to the PATH after installed TeXlive.
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 22:33
@Sigur, adding/usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux/after doingsudo suworked
– Viesturs
Jan 16 at 22:35
|
show 1 more comment
It is not found because it is not in the path.
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 22:30
What are the permissions of this folder? What doesls -l /usr/local/texlive/2018/say?
– samcarter
Jan 16 at 22:31
1
You can call it passing the path/usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux/tlmgr
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 22:32
I suspect that you didn't add binaries to the PATH after installed TeXlive.
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 22:33
@Sigur, adding/usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux/after doingsudo suworked
– Viesturs
Jan 16 at 22:35
It is not found because it is not in the path.
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 22:30
It is not found because it is not in the path.
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 22:30
What are the permissions of this folder? What does
ls -l /usr/local/texlive/2018/ say?– samcarter
Jan 16 at 22:31
What are the permissions of this folder? What does
ls -l /usr/local/texlive/2018/ say?– samcarter
Jan 16 at 22:31
1
1
You can call it passing the path
/usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux/tlmgr– Sigur
Jan 16 at 22:32
You can call it passing the path
/usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux/tlmgr– Sigur
Jan 16 at 22:32
I suspect that you didn't add binaries to the PATH after installed TeXlive.
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 22:33
I suspect that you didn't add binaries to the PATH after installed TeXlive.
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 22:33
@Sigur, adding
/usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux/ after doing sudo su worked– Viesturs
Jan 16 at 22:35
@Sigur, adding
/usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux/ after doing sudo su worked– Viesturs
Jan 16 at 22:35
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The $PATH used by sudo is different from the one used by $USER, so if the $PATH does not include, in your case, the path /usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux/, then sudo will not be able to find tlmgr.
On Ubuntu, I highly recommend that you can install texlive via apt. See the Ubuntu package database for a list of all packages related to texlive. Also, from the same domain as you provided, they have a page specifically written for Debian-based (which Ubuntu is based on) systems. If you choose to install the full distribution of texlive, you will not have to install texlive packages using tlmgr and just let apt (the package manager for Debian-based systems) handle that for you. Otherwise, you will only need to run tlmgr with the sudo command, except now the distribution from apt should provide a symlink (or equivalent) to a path that your root account refers to.
However, as pointed out in the subcomments, texlive on apt is possibly outdated.
If disk space is a serious concern, and/or if you are comfortable with the command line, I highly recommend that you install tlmgr as a user instead of root. Follow the guide from Wikibooks for a minimal installation process. Last time I checked, the guide is still up to date. The important point to install tlmgr so that it does not require root access is the following:
- You may want to change the directory options. For example you may want to hide your personal macro folder which is located at TEXMFHOME. It is ~/texmf by default. Replace it by ~/.texmf to hide it.
You will need to change the default /usr/local/ to your home directory.
If disk space is not of your concern, then just choose the full distribution schema.
Edits:
See also @daleif's comment under this reply, especially these two sentences:
Ubuntu texlive is quite out of date and split into a myriad of Ubuntu packages. So a lot of users do not recommended using the apt version
Just more information for you to watch out for when deciding which installation path you wish to go down.
answered Jan 17 at 1:52
JaporizedJaporized
817
5
Note that the Ubuntu texlive is quite out of date and split into a myriad of Ubuntu packages. So a lot of users do not recommended using the apt version. Figuring out which unubutu texlive package to install to get a given latex package is a pain.
– daleif
Jan 17 at 6:50
Thanks for the info @daleif. I don't use a Debian-based distribution myself so I am not aware of that. I'll put a note in my answer.
– Japorized
Jan 17 at 17:13
It is an issue with most Linux dists that provide TeXLive. Some even take TeXLive year X before it is released, and thus may ship one that contains errors.
– daleif
Jan 17 at 17:15
I suppose that its a problem that stems from the philosophy that goes behind distributing packages on a distribution, though it may be the case that this applies only to how texlive is being handled. That said, archlinux seems to keep its repo updated.
– Japorized
Jan 17 at 17:24
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470453%2fhow-to-run-tlmgr-in-ubuntu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The $PATH used by sudo is different from the one used by $USER, so if the $PATH does not include, in your case, the path /usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux/, then sudo will not be able to find tlmgr.
On Ubuntu, I highly recommend that you can install texlive via apt. See the Ubuntu package database for a list of all packages related to texlive. Also, from the same domain as you provided, they have a page specifically written for Debian-based (which Ubuntu is based on) systems. If you choose to install the full distribution of texlive, you will not have to install texlive packages using tlmgr and just let apt (the package manager for Debian-based systems) handle that for you. Otherwise, you will only need to run tlmgr with the sudo command, except now the distribution from apt should provide a symlink (or equivalent) to a path that your root account refers to.
However, as pointed out in the subcomments, texlive on apt is possibly outdated.
If disk space is a serious concern, and/or if you are comfortable with the command line, I highly recommend that you install tlmgr as a user instead of root. Follow the guide from Wikibooks for a minimal installation process. Last time I checked, the guide is still up to date. The important point to install tlmgr so that it does not require root access is the following:
- You may want to change the directory options. For example you may want to hide your personal macro folder which is located at TEXMFHOME. It is ~/texmf by default. Replace it by ~/.texmf to hide it.
You will need to change the default /usr/local/ to your home directory.
If disk space is not of your concern, then just choose the full distribution schema.
Edits:
See also @daleif's comment under this reply, especially these two sentences:
Ubuntu texlive is quite out of date and split into a myriad of Ubuntu packages. So a lot of users do not recommended using the apt version
Just more information for you to watch out for when deciding which installation path you wish to go down.
answered Jan 17 at 1:52
JaporizedJaporized
817
5
Note that the Ubuntu texlive is quite out of date and split into a myriad of Ubuntu packages. So a lot of users do not recommended using the apt version. Figuring out which unubutu texlive package to install to get a given latex package is a pain.
– daleif
Jan 17 at 6:50
Thanks for the info @daleif. I don't use a Debian-based distribution myself so I am not aware of that. I'll put a note in my answer.
– Japorized
Jan 17 at 17:13
It is an issue with most Linux dists that provide TeXLive. Some even take TeXLive year X before it is released, and thus may ship one that contains errors.
– daleif
Jan 17 at 17:15
I suppose that its a problem that stems from the philosophy that goes behind distributing packages on a distribution, though it may be the case that this applies only to how texlive is being handled. That said, archlinux seems to keep its repo updated.
– Japorized
Jan 17 at 17:24
add a comment |
The $PATH used by sudo is different from the one used by $USER, so if the $PATH does not include, in your case, the path /usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux/, then sudo will not be able to find tlmgr.
On Ubuntu, I highly recommend that you can install texlive via apt. See the Ubuntu package database for a list of all packages related to texlive. Also, from the same domain as you provided, they have a page specifically written for Debian-based (which Ubuntu is based on) systems. If you choose to install the full distribution of texlive, you will not have to install texlive packages using tlmgr and just let apt (the package manager for Debian-based systems) handle that for you. Otherwise, you will only need to run tlmgr with the sudo command, except now the distribution from apt should provide a symlink (or equivalent) to a path that your root account refers to.
However, as pointed out in the subcomments, texlive on apt is possibly outdated.
If disk space is a serious concern, and/or if you are comfortable with the command line, I highly recommend that you install tlmgr as a user instead of root. Follow the guide from Wikibooks for a minimal installation process. Last time I checked, the guide is still up to date. The important point to install tlmgr so that it does not require root access is the following:
- You may want to change the directory options. For example you may want to hide your personal macro folder which is located at TEXMFHOME. It is ~/texmf by default. Replace it by ~/.texmf to hide it.
You will need to change the default /usr/local/ to your home directory.
If disk space is not of your concern, then just choose the full distribution schema.
Edits:
See also @daleif's comment under this reply, especially these two sentences:
Ubuntu texlive is quite out of date and split into a myriad of Ubuntu packages. So a lot of users do not recommended using the apt version
Just more information for you to watch out for when deciding which installation path you wish to go down.
answered Jan 17 at 1:52
JaporizedJaporized
817
5
Note that the Ubuntu texlive is quite out of date and split into a myriad of Ubuntu packages. So a lot of users do not recommended using the apt version. Figuring out which unubutu texlive package to install to get a given latex package is a pain.
– daleif
Jan 17 at 6:50
Thanks for the info @daleif. I don't use a Debian-based distribution myself so I am not aware of that. I'll put a note in my answer.
– Japorized
Jan 17 at 17:13
It is an issue with most Linux dists that provide TeXLive. Some even take TeXLive year X before it is released, and thus may ship one that contains errors.
– daleif
Jan 17 at 17:15
I suppose that its a problem that stems from the philosophy that goes behind distributing packages on a distribution, though it may be the case that this applies only to how texlive is being handled. That said, archlinux seems to keep its repo updated.
– Japorized
Jan 17 at 17:24
add a comment |
The $PATH used by sudo is different from the one used by $USER, so if the $PATH does not include, in your case, the path /usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux/, then sudo will not be able to find tlmgr.
On Ubuntu, I highly recommend that you can install texlive via apt. See the Ubuntu package database for a list of all packages related to texlive. Also, from the same domain as you provided, they have a page specifically written for Debian-based (which Ubuntu is based on) systems. If you choose to install the full distribution of texlive, you will not have to install texlive packages using tlmgr and just let apt (the package manager for Debian-based systems) handle that for you. Otherwise, you will only need to run tlmgr with the sudo command, except now the distribution from apt should provide a symlink (or equivalent) to a path that your root account refers to.
However, as pointed out in the subcomments, texlive on apt is possibly outdated.
If disk space is a serious concern, and/or if you are comfortable with the command line, I highly recommend that you install tlmgr as a user instead of root. Follow the guide from Wikibooks for a minimal installation process. Last time I checked, the guide is still up to date. The important point to install tlmgr so that it does not require root access is the following:
- You may want to change the directory options. For example you may want to hide your personal macro folder which is located at TEXMFHOME. It is ~/texmf by default. Replace it by ~/.texmf to hide it.
You will need to change the default /usr/local/ to your home directory.
If disk space is not of your concern, then just choose the full distribution schema.
Edits:
See also @daleif's comment under this reply, especially these two sentences:
Ubuntu texlive is quite out of date and split into a myriad of Ubuntu packages. So a lot of users do not recommended using the apt version
Just more information for you to watch out for when deciding which installation path you wish to go down.
answered Jan 17 at 1:52
JaporizedJaporized
817
The $PATH used by sudo is different from the one used by $USER, so if the $PATH does not include, in your case, the path /usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux/, then sudo will not be able to find tlmgr.
On Ubuntu, I highly recommend that you can install texlive via apt. See the Ubuntu package database for a list of all packages related to texlive. Also, from the same domain as you provided, they have a page specifically written for Debian-based (which Ubuntu is based on) systems. If you choose to install the full distribution of texlive, you will not have to install texlive packages using tlmgr and just let apt (the package manager for Debian-based systems) handle that for you. Otherwise, you will only need to run tlmgr with the sudo command, except now the distribution from apt should provide a symlink (or equivalent) to a path that your root account refers to.
However, as pointed out in the subcomments, texlive on apt is possibly outdated.
If disk space is a serious concern, and/or if you are comfortable with the command line, I highly recommend that you install tlmgr as a user instead of root. Follow the guide from Wikibooks for a minimal installation process. Last time I checked, the guide is still up to date. The important point to install tlmgr so that it does not require root access is the following:
- You may want to change the directory options. For example you may want to hide your personal macro folder which is located at TEXMFHOME. It is ~/texmf by default. Replace it by ~/.texmf to hide it.
You will need to change the default /usr/local/ to your home directory.
If disk space is not of your concern, then just choose the full distribution schema.
Edits:
See also @daleif's comment under this reply, especially these two sentences:
Ubuntu texlive is quite out of date and split into a myriad of Ubuntu packages. So a lot of users do not recommended using the apt version
Just more information for you to watch out for when deciding which installation path you wish to go down.
answered Jan 17 at 1:52
JaporizedJaporized
817
edited Jan 17 at 18:38
answered Jan 17 at 1:52
JaporizedJaporized
817
answered Jan 17 at 1:52
JaporizedJaporized
817
answered Jan 17 at 1:52
JaporizedJaporized
817
817
5
Note that the Ubuntu texlive is quite out of date and split into a myriad of Ubuntu packages. So a lot of users do not recommended using the apt version. Figuring out which unubutu texlive package to install to get a given latex package is a pain.
– daleif
Jan 17 at 6:50
Thanks for the info @daleif. I don't use a Debian-based distribution myself so I am not aware of that. I'll put a note in my answer.
– Japorized
Jan 17 at 17:13
It is an issue with most Linux dists that provide TeXLive. Some even take TeXLive year X before it is released, and thus may ship one that contains errors.
– daleif
Jan 17 at 17:15
I suppose that its a problem that stems from the philosophy that goes behind distributing packages on a distribution, though it may be the case that this applies only to how texlive is being handled. That said, archlinux seems to keep its repo updated.
– Japorized
Jan 17 at 17:24
add a comment |
5
Note that the Ubuntu texlive is quite out of date and split into a myriad of Ubuntu packages. So a lot of users do not recommended using the apt version. Figuring out which unubutu texlive package to install to get a given latex package is a pain.
– daleif
Jan 17 at 6:50
Thanks for the info @daleif. I don't use a Debian-based distribution myself so I am not aware of that. I'll put a note in my answer.
– Japorized
Jan 17 at 17:13
It is an issue with most Linux dists that provide TeXLive. Some even take TeXLive year X before it is released, and thus may ship one that contains errors.
– daleif
Jan 17 at 17:15
I suppose that its a problem that stems from the philosophy that goes behind distributing packages on a distribution, though it may be the case that this applies only to how texlive is being handled. That said, archlinux seems to keep its repo updated.
– Japorized
Jan 17 at 17:24
5
5
Note that the Ubuntu texlive is quite out of date and split into a myriad of Ubuntu packages. So a lot of users do not recommended using the apt version. Figuring out which unubutu texlive package to install to get a given latex package is a pain.
– daleif
Jan 17 at 6:50
Note that the Ubuntu texlive is quite out of date and split into a myriad of Ubuntu packages. So a lot of users do not recommended using the apt version. Figuring out which unubutu texlive package to install to get a given latex package is a pain.
– daleif
Jan 17 at 6:50
Thanks for the info @daleif. I don't use a Debian-based distribution myself so I am not aware of that. I'll put a note in my answer.
– Japorized
Jan 17 at 17:13
Thanks for the info @daleif. I don't use a Debian-based distribution myself so I am not aware of that. I'll put a note in my answer.
– Japorized
Jan 17 at 17:13
It is an issue with most Linux dists that provide TeXLive. Some even take TeXLive year X before it is released, and thus may ship one that contains errors.
– daleif
Jan 17 at 17:15
It is an issue with most Linux dists that provide TeXLive. Some even take TeXLive year X before it is released, and thus may ship one that contains errors.
– daleif
Jan 17 at 17:15
I suppose that its a problem that stems from the philosophy that goes behind distributing packages on a distribution, though it may be the case that this applies only to how texlive is being handled. That said, archlinux seems to keep its repo updated.
– Japorized
Jan 17 at 17:24
I suppose that its a problem that stems from the philosophy that goes behind distributing packages on a distribution, though it may be the case that this applies only to how texlive is being handled. That said, archlinux seems to keep its repo updated.
– Japorized
Jan 17 at 17:24
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470453%2fhow-to-run-tlmgr-in-ubuntu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
It is not found because it is not in the path.
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 22:30
What are the permissions of this folder? What does
ls -l /usr/local/texlive/2018/say?– samcarter
Jan 16 at 22:31
1
You can call it passing the path
/usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux/tlmgr– Sigur
Jan 16 at 22:32
I suspect that you didn't add binaries to the PATH after installed TeXlive.
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 22:33
@Sigur, adding
/usr/local/texlive/2018/bin/x86_64-linux/after doingsudo suworked– Viesturs
Jan 16 at 22:35