conditions for existence of orthogonal function expansion












1












$begingroup$


Do the Dirichlet conditions for Fourier series apply to orthogonal functions generally (with perhaps an appropriate weight function) over an interval [a,b]? What about Laguerre and Hermite, which are defined over an infinite interval?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean by Dirichlet conditions? What type of conditions are referring to?
    $endgroup$
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 26 '18 at 22:26










  • $begingroup$
    @DisintegratingByParts en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_conditions
    $endgroup$
    – uniquesolution
    Nov 26 '18 at 22:29










  • $begingroup$
    Then, yes, Dirichlet conditions will give convergence of the orthogonal expansions. On the infinite interval, you need some condition of integrability or square integrability. Classical proofs of this are not easy for the Hermite case, but the result holds.
    $endgroup$
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 26 '18 at 22:35












  • $begingroup$
    A condition of integrability is required even for Fourier. On an infinite interval, then, I would expect absolute integrability of a function multiplied by the square-root of the weight function to be required.
    $endgroup$
    – gilonik
    Nov 26 '18 at 22:53










  • $begingroup$
    @gilonik : The Dirichlet condition require local integrability in order to make sense. A global condition such as $L^1$ is also needed. The global condition just needs to be good enough to argue the Riemann-Lebesgue type of lemma to force vanishing of the tail integrals in the limit.
    $endgroup$
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 27 '18 at 0:28


















1












$begingroup$


Do the Dirichlet conditions for Fourier series apply to orthogonal functions generally (with perhaps an appropriate weight function) over an interval [a,b]? What about Laguerre and Hermite, which are defined over an infinite interval?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean by Dirichlet conditions? What type of conditions are referring to?
    $endgroup$
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 26 '18 at 22:26










  • $begingroup$
    @DisintegratingByParts en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_conditions
    $endgroup$
    – uniquesolution
    Nov 26 '18 at 22:29










  • $begingroup$
    Then, yes, Dirichlet conditions will give convergence of the orthogonal expansions. On the infinite interval, you need some condition of integrability or square integrability. Classical proofs of this are not easy for the Hermite case, but the result holds.
    $endgroup$
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 26 '18 at 22:35












  • $begingroup$
    A condition of integrability is required even for Fourier. On an infinite interval, then, I would expect absolute integrability of a function multiplied by the square-root of the weight function to be required.
    $endgroup$
    – gilonik
    Nov 26 '18 at 22:53










  • $begingroup$
    @gilonik : The Dirichlet condition require local integrability in order to make sense. A global condition such as $L^1$ is also needed. The global condition just needs to be good enough to argue the Riemann-Lebesgue type of lemma to force vanishing of the tail integrals in the limit.
    $endgroup$
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 27 '18 at 0:28
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


Do the Dirichlet conditions for Fourier series apply to orthogonal functions generally (with perhaps an appropriate weight function) over an interval [a,b]? What about Laguerre and Hermite, which are defined over an infinite interval?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Do the Dirichlet conditions for Fourier series apply to orthogonal functions generally (with perhaps an appropriate weight function) over an interval [a,b]? What about Laguerre and Hermite, which are defined over an infinite interval?







functional-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 26 '18 at 22:16







gilonik

















asked Nov 26 '18 at 22:01









gilonikgilonik

113




113












  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean by Dirichlet conditions? What type of conditions are referring to?
    $endgroup$
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 26 '18 at 22:26










  • $begingroup$
    @DisintegratingByParts en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_conditions
    $endgroup$
    – uniquesolution
    Nov 26 '18 at 22:29










  • $begingroup$
    Then, yes, Dirichlet conditions will give convergence of the orthogonal expansions. On the infinite interval, you need some condition of integrability or square integrability. Classical proofs of this are not easy for the Hermite case, but the result holds.
    $endgroup$
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 26 '18 at 22:35












  • $begingroup$
    A condition of integrability is required even for Fourier. On an infinite interval, then, I would expect absolute integrability of a function multiplied by the square-root of the weight function to be required.
    $endgroup$
    – gilonik
    Nov 26 '18 at 22:53










  • $begingroup$
    @gilonik : The Dirichlet condition require local integrability in order to make sense. A global condition such as $L^1$ is also needed. The global condition just needs to be good enough to argue the Riemann-Lebesgue type of lemma to force vanishing of the tail integrals in the limit.
    $endgroup$
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 27 '18 at 0:28




















  • $begingroup$
    What do you mean by Dirichlet conditions? What type of conditions are referring to?
    $endgroup$
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 26 '18 at 22:26










  • $begingroup$
    @DisintegratingByParts en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_conditions
    $endgroup$
    – uniquesolution
    Nov 26 '18 at 22:29










  • $begingroup$
    Then, yes, Dirichlet conditions will give convergence of the orthogonal expansions. On the infinite interval, you need some condition of integrability or square integrability. Classical proofs of this are not easy for the Hermite case, but the result holds.
    $endgroup$
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 26 '18 at 22:35












  • $begingroup$
    A condition of integrability is required even for Fourier. On an infinite interval, then, I would expect absolute integrability of a function multiplied by the square-root of the weight function to be required.
    $endgroup$
    – gilonik
    Nov 26 '18 at 22:53










  • $begingroup$
    @gilonik : The Dirichlet condition require local integrability in order to make sense. A global condition such as $L^1$ is also needed. The global condition just needs to be good enough to argue the Riemann-Lebesgue type of lemma to force vanishing of the tail integrals in the limit.
    $endgroup$
    – DisintegratingByParts
    Nov 27 '18 at 0:28


















$begingroup$
What do you mean by Dirichlet conditions? What type of conditions are referring to?
$endgroup$
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 26 '18 at 22:26




$begingroup$
What do you mean by Dirichlet conditions? What type of conditions are referring to?
$endgroup$
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 26 '18 at 22:26












$begingroup$
@DisintegratingByParts en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_conditions
$endgroup$
– uniquesolution
Nov 26 '18 at 22:29




$begingroup$
@DisintegratingByParts en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_conditions
$endgroup$
– uniquesolution
Nov 26 '18 at 22:29












$begingroup$
Then, yes, Dirichlet conditions will give convergence of the orthogonal expansions. On the infinite interval, you need some condition of integrability or square integrability. Classical proofs of this are not easy for the Hermite case, but the result holds.
$endgroup$
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 26 '18 at 22:35






$begingroup$
Then, yes, Dirichlet conditions will give convergence of the orthogonal expansions. On the infinite interval, you need some condition of integrability or square integrability. Classical proofs of this are not easy for the Hermite case, but the result holds.
$endgroup$
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 26 '18 at 22:35














$begingroup$
A condition of integrability is required even for Fourier. On an infinite interval, then, I would expect absolute integrability of a function multiplied by the square-root of the weight function to be required.
$endgroup$
– gilonik
Nov 26 '18 at 22:53




$begingroup$
A condition of integrability is required even for Fourier. On an infinite interval, then, I would expect absolute integrability of a function multiplied by the square-root of the weight function to be required.
$endgroup$
– gilonik
Nov 26 '18 at 22:53












$begingroup$
@gilonik : The Dirichlet condition require local integrability in order to make sense. A global condition such as $L^1$ is also needed. The global condition just needs to be good enough to argue the Riemann-Lebesgue type of lemma to force vanishing of the tail integrals in the limit.
$endgroup$
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 27 '18 at 0:28






$begingroup$
@gilonik : The Dirichlet condition require local integrability in order to make sense. A global condition such as $L^1$ is also needed. The global condition just needs to be good enough to argue the Riemann-Lebesgue type of lemma to force vanishing of the tail integrals in the limit.
$endgroup$
– DisintegratingByParts
Nov 27 '18 at 0:28












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015001%2fconditions-for-existence-of-orthogonal-function-expansion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015001%2fconditions-for-existence-of-orthogonal-function-expansion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?