Word norm in compact subsets of finitely generated groups











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $G$ be a finitely generated topological group, not necessarily discrete. Fix a finite generating set $S$ and denote by $|x|$ the word norm of $x in G$ with respect to this generating set, i.e., the minimal $n in mathbb{N}$ such that there exist $s_1, ldots, s_n in S$ with $x = s_1 cdots s_n$. Let $K$ be a compact subset of $G$. Is it true that ${ |k| : k in K } subseteq mathbb{N}$ is bounded?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Can you please provide the definition of "word norm"?
    – uniquesolution
    9 hours ago










  • I edited the question
    – user404944
    9 hours ago















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $G$ be a finitely generated topological group, not necessarily discrete. Fix a finite generating set $S$ and denote by $|x|$ the word norm of $x in G$ with respect to this generating set, i.e., the minimal $n in mathbb{N}$ such that there exist $s_1, ldots, s_n in S$ with $x = s_1 cdots s_n$. Let $K$ be a compact subset of $G$. Is it true that ${ |k| : k in K } subseteq mathbb{N}$ is bounded?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Can you please provide the definition of "word norm"?
    – uniquesolution
    9 hours ago










  • I edited the question
    – user404944
    9 hours ago













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Let $G$ be a finitely generated topological group, not necessarily discrete. Fix a finite generating set $S$ and denote by $|x|$ the word norm of $x in G$ with respect to this generating set, i.e., the minimal $n in mathbb{N}$ such that there exist $s_1, ldots, s_n in S$ with $x = s_1 cdots s_n$. Let $K$ be a compact subset of $G$. Is it true that ${ |k| : k in K } subseteq mathbb{N}$ is bounded?










share|cite|improve this question















Let $G$ be a finitely generated topological group, not necessarily discrete. Fix a finite generating set $S$ and denote by $|x|$ the word norm of $x in G$ with respect to this generating set, i.e., the minimal $n in mathbb{N}$ such that there exist $s_1, ldots, s_n in S$ with $x = s_1 cdots s_n$. Let $K$ be a compact subset of $G$. Is it true that ${ |k| : k in K } subseteq mathbb{N}$ is bounded?







abstract-algebra group-theory topological-groups geometric-group-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 9 hours ago

























asked 10 hours ago









user404944

735211




735211












  • Can you please provide the definition of "word norm"?
    – uniquesolution
    9 hours ago










  • I edited the question
    – user404944
    9 hours ago


















  • Can you please provide the definition of "word norm"?
    – uniquesolution
    9 hours ago










  • I edited the question
    – user404944
    9 hours ago
















Can you please provide the definition of "word norm"?
– uniquesolution
9 hours ago




Can you please provide the definition of "word norm"?
– uniquesolution
9 hours ago












I edited the question
– user404944
9 hours ago




I edited the question
– user404944
9 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










If I understood the question correctly, no.



Pick $G=mathbb{Z}$, $S={ 1 }$, but endow $G$ with the $p$-adic topology (for example $p=2$).
Then $K={p^k}_{k geq 0} cup {0}$ is a converging sequence and its endpoint, so is a compact subset, and clearly the lengths are not bounded on $K$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Great, that's what I imagined. Just one more question, is $mathbb{Z}$ locally compact with the $p$-adic topology? I know the definition but I am not that familiar with it...
    – user404944
    8 hours ago










  • It is not locally compact; I think a countable group cannot be locally compact unless the topology is discrete, it has to do with perfect sets being uncountable...
    – user120527
    8 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995339%2fword-norm-in-compact-subsets-of-finitely-generated-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest
































1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










If I understood the question correctly, no.



Pick $G=mathbb{Z}$, $S={ 1 }$, but endow $G$ with the $p$-adic topology (for example $p=2$).
Then $K={p^k}_{k geq 0} cup {0}$ is a converging sequence and its endpoint, so is a compact subset, and clearly the lengths are not bounded on $K$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Great, that's what I imagined. Just one more question, is $mathbb{Z}$ locally compact with the $p$-adic topology? I know the definition but I am not that familiar with it...
    – user404944
    8 hours ago










  • It is not locally compact; I think a countable group cannot be locally compact unless the topology is discrete, it has to do with perfect sets being uncountable...
    – user120527
    8 hours ago















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










If I understood the question correctly, no.



Pick $G=mathbb{Z}$, $S={ 1 }$, but endow $G$ with the $p$-adic topology (for example $p=2$).
Then $K={p^k}_{k geq 0} cup {0}$ is a converging sequence and its endpoint, so is a compact subset, and clearly the lengths are not bounded on $K$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Great, that's what I imagined. Just one more question, is $mathbb{Z}$ locally compact with the $p$-adic topology? I know the definition but I am not that familiar with it...
    – user404944
    8 hours ago










  • It is not locally compact; I think a countable group cannot be locally compact unless the topology is discrete, it has to do with perfect sets being uncountable...
    – user120527
    8 hours ago













up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






If I understood the question correctly, no.



Pick $G=mathbb{Z}$, $S={ 1 }$, but endow $G$ with the $p$-adic topology (for example $p=2$).
Then $K={p^k}_{k geq 0} cup {0}$ is a converging sequence and its endpoint, so is a compact subset, and clearly the lengths are not bounded on $K$.






share|cite|improve this answer












If I understood the question correctly, no.



Pick $G=mathbb{Z}$, $S={ 1 }$, but endow $G$ with the $p$-adic topology (for example $p=2$).
Then $K={p^k}_{k geq 0} cup {0}$ is a converging sequence and its endpoint, so is a compact subset, and clearly the lengths are not bounded on $K$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 8 hours ago









user120527

1,631211




1,631211












  • Great, that's what I imagined. Just one more question, is $mathbb{Z}$ locally compact with the $p$-adic topology? I know the definition but I am not that familiar with it...
    – user404944
    8 hours ago










  • It is not locally compact; I think a countable group cannot be locally compact unless the topology is discrete, it has to do with perfect sets being uncountable...
    – user120527
    8 hours ago


















  • Great, that's what I imagined. Just one more question, is $mathbb{Z}$ locally compact with the $p$-adic topology? I know the definition but I am not that familiar with it...
    – user404944
    8 hours ago










  • It is not locally compact; I think a countable group cannot be locally compact unless the topology is discrete, it has to do with perfect sets being uncountable...
    – user120527
    8 hours ago
















Great, that's what I imagined. Just one more question, is $mathbb{Z}$ locally compact with the $p$-adic topology? I know the definition but I am not that familiar with it...
– user404944
8 hours ago




Great, that's what I imagined. Just one more question, is $mathbb{Z}$ locally compact with the $p$-adic topology? I know the definition but I am not that familiar with it...
– user404944
8 hours ago












It is not locally compact; I think a countable group cannot be locally compact unless the topology is discrete, it has to do with perfect sets being uncountable...
– user120527
8 hours ago




It is not locally compact; I think a countable group cannot be locally compact unless the topology is discrete, it has to do with perfect sets being uncountable...
– user120527
8 hours ago


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995339%2fword-norm-in-compact-subsets-of-finitely-generated-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest




















































































Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?