Is it possible to prove Fubini’s Theorem without Dynkin’s Theorem or the Monotone Class Theorem?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












Fubini’s Theorem for Lebesgue integrals states that if $X$ and $Y$ are Sigma-finite measure spaces then the integral of a (well-behaved) function $f(x,y)$ with respect to the product measure on $Xtimes Y$ is equal to the iterated integral of $f$ with respect to the measure on $X$ and the measure on $Y$. The standard way to prove Fubini’s theorem is to prove it first for characteristic functions, then for simple functions, then for non-negative measurable functions, etc.



The hard part is proving it for characteristic functions. You first prove it for characteristic functions of measurable rectangles, i.e. Cartesian products of measurable sets in $X$ and measurable sets in $Y$. Then you have to somehow use that to prove it for characteristic functions of all measurable sets in the product measure space. This is usually done using one of two theorems:




  1. Dynkin’s pi-lambda theorem, which states that if a pi-system of sets is contained in a lambda-system of sets, then the sigma algebra generated by the pi-system is also contained in the lambda system.

  2. Halmos’ monotone class theorem, which states that if an algebra of sets is contained in a monotone class of sets, then the sigma algebra generated by the algebra is also contained in the monotone class.


Both these theorems apply because the collection of measurable rectangles is both a pi-system and an algebra, and the collection of sets whose characteristic functions satisfy Fubini’s theorem is both a lambda-system anda monotone class.



My question is, is it possible to prove Fubini’s theorem without using either of these results? I assume that there would be some way, considering that Fubini proved his theorem long before Eugene Dynkin and Paul Halmos were even born.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Fubini’s Theorem for Lebesgue integrals states that if $X$ and $Y$ are Sigma-finite measure spaces then the integral of a (well-behaved) function $f(x,y)$ with respect to the product measure on $Xtimes Y$ is equal to the iterated integral of $f$ with respect to the measure on $X$ and the measure on $Y$. The standard way to prove Fubini’s theorem is to prove it first for characteristic functions, then for simple functions, then for non-negative measurable functions, etc.



    The hard part is proving it for characteristic functions. You first prove it for characteristic functions of measurable rectangles, i.e. Cartesian products of measurable sets in $X$ and measurable sets in $Y$. Then you have to somehow use that to prove it for characteristic functions of all measurable sets in the product measure space. This is usually done using one of two theorems:




    1. Dynkin’s pi-lambda theorem, which states that if a pi-system of sets is contained in a lambda-system of sets, then the sigma algebra generated by the pi-system is also contained in the lambda system.

    2. Halmos’ monotone class theorem, which states that if an algebra of sets is contained in a monotone class of sets, then the sigma algebra generated by the algebra is also contained in the monotone class.


    Both these theorems apply because the collection of measurable rectangles is both a pi-system and an algebra, and the collection of sets whose characteristic functions satisfy Fubini’s theorem is both a lambda-system anda monotone class.



    My question is, is it possible to prove Fubini’s theorem without using either of these results? I assume that there would be some way, considering that Fubini proved his theorem long before Eugene Dynkin and Paul Halmos were even born.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Fubini’s Theorem for Lebesgue integrals states that if $X$ and $Y$ are Sigma-finite measure spaces then the integral of a (well-behaved) function $f(x,y)$ with respect to the product measure on $Xtimes Y$ is equal to the iterated integral of $f$ with respect to the measure on $X$ and the measure on $Y$. The standard way to prove Fubini’s theorem is to prove it first for characteristic functions, then for simple functions, then for non-negative measurable functions, etc.



      The hard part is proving it for characteristic functions. You first prove it for characteristic functions of measurable rectangles, i.e. Cartesian products of measurable sets in $X$ and measurable sets in $Y$. Then you have to somehow use that to prove it for characteristic functions of all measurable sets in the product measure space. This is usually done using one of two theorems:




      1. Dynkin’s pi-lambda theorem, which states that if a pi-system of sets is contained in a lambda-system of sets, then the sigma algebra generated by the pi-system is also contained in the lambda system.

      2. Halmos’ monotone class theorem, which states that if an algebra of sets is contained in a monotone class of sets, then the sigma algebra generated by the algebra is also contained in the monotone class.


      Both these theorems apply because the collection of measurable rectangles is both a pi-system and an algebra, and the collection of sets whose characteristic functions satisfy Fubini’s theorem is both a lambda-system anda monotone class.



      My question is, is it possible to prove Fubini’s theorem without using either of these results? I assume that there would be some way, considering that Fubini proved his theorem long before Eugene Dynkin and Paul Halmos were even born.










      share|cite|improve this question















      Fubini’s Theorem for Lebesgue integrals states that if $X$ and $Y$ are Sigma-finite measure spaces then the integral of a (well-behaved) function $f(x,y)$ with respect to the product measure on $Xtimes Y$ is equal to the iterated integral of $f$ with respect to the measure on $X$ and the measure on $Y$. The standard way to prove Fubini’s theorem is to prove it first for characteristic functions, then for simple functions, then for non-negative measurable functions, etc.



      The hard part is proving it for characteristic functions. You first prove it for characteristic functions of measurable rectangles, i.e. Cartesian products of measurable sets in $X$ and measurable sets in $Y$. Then you have to somehow use that to prove it for characteristic functions of all measurable sets in the product measure space. This is usually done using one of two theorems:




      1. Dynkin’s pi-lambda theorem, which states that if a pi-system of sets is contained in a lambda-system of sets, then the sigma algebra generated by the pi-system is also contained in the lambda system.

      2. Halmos’ monotone class theorem, which states that if an algebra of sets is contained in a monotone class of sets, then the sigma algebra generated by the algebra is also contained in the monotone class.


      Both these theorems apply because the collection of measurable rectangles is both a pi-system and an algebra, and the collection of sets whose characteristic functions satisfy Fubini’s theorem is both a lambda-system anda monotone class.



      My question is, is it possible to prove Fubini’s theorem without using either of these results? I assume that there would be some way, considering that Fubini proved his theorem long before Eugene Dynkin and Paul Halmos were even born.







      measure-theory lebesgue-integral math-history alternative-proof multiple-integral






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 16 hours ago

























      asked 23 hours ago









      Keshav Srinivasan

      2,40911340




      2,40911340



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995025%2fis-it-possible-to-prove-fubini-s-theorem-without-dynkin-s-theorem-or-the-monoton%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest





































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995025%2fis-it-possible-to-prove-fubini-s-theorem-without-dynkin-s-theorem-or-the-monoton%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest




















































































          Popular posts from this blog

          Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

          ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

          Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?