Proof of the Hockey-Stick Identity: $sumlimits_{t=0}^n binom tk = binom{n+1}{k+1}$











up vote
38
down vote

favorite
33












After reading this question, the most popular answer use the identity
$$sum_{t=0}^n binom{t}{k} = binom{n+1}{k+1}.$$



What's the name of this identity? Is it the identity of the Pascal's triangle modified.



How can we prove it? I tried by induction, but without success. Can we also prove it algebraically?



Thanks for your help.





EDIT 01 : This identity is known as the hockey-stick identity because, on Pascal's triangle, when the addends represented in the summation and the sum itself are highlighted, a hockey-stick shape is revealed.



Hockey-stick










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 6




    It is sometimes called the "hockey stick".
    – user940
    Oct 21 '15 at 15:24










  • There is another cute graphical illustration on the plane of $binom{n}{k}$
    – Eli Korvigo
    Oct 21 '15 at 16:54








  • 4




    It's pretty straightforward from the picture. Just switch the $1$ at the top of the stick with the $1$ directly below, then repeatedly replace adjacent numbers with the number in the cell below. This can be translated into a formal proof with words and symbols, but an animation or series of pictures is much more effective.
    – user2357112
    Oct 22 '15 at 3:24










  • See also this question. Some post which are linked there might be of interest, too.
    – Martin Sleziak
    Jan 18 '16 at 15:05















up vote
38
down vote

favorite
33












After reading this question, the most popular answer use the identity
$$sum_{t=0}^n binom{t}{k} = binom{n+1}{k+1}.$$



What's the name of this identity? Is it the identity of the Pascal's triangle modified.



How can we prove it? I tried by induction, but without success. Can we also prove it algebraically?



Thanks for your help.





EDIT 01 : This identity is known as the hockey-stick identity because, on Pascal's triangle, when the addends represented in the summation and the sum itself are highlighted, a hockey-stick shape is revealed.



Hockey-stick










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 6




    It is sometimes called the "hockey stick".
    – user940
    Oct 21 '15 at 15:24










  • There is another cute graphical illustration on the plane of $binom{n}{k}$
    – Eli Korvigo
    Oct 21 '15 at 16:54








  • 4




    It's pretty straightforward from the picture. Just switch the $1$ at the top of the stick with the $1$ directly below, then repeatedly replace adjacent numbers with the number in the cell below. This can be translated into a formal proof with words and symbols, but an animation or series of pictures is much more effective.
    – user2357112
    Oct 22 '15 at 3:24










  • See also this question. Some post which are linked there might be of interest, too.
    – Martin Sleziak
    Jan 18 '16 at 15:05













up vote
38
down vote

favorite
33









up vote
38
down vote

favorite
33






33





After reading this question, the most popular answer use the identity
$$sum_{t=0}^n binom{t}{k} = binom{n+1}{k+1}.$$



What's the name of this identity? Is it the identity of the Pascal's triangle modified.



How can we prove it? I tried by induction, but without success. Can we also prove it algebraically?



Thanks for your help.





EDIT 01 : This identity is known as the hockey-stick identity because, on Pascal's triangle, when the addends represented in the summation and the sum itself are highlighted, a hockey-stick shape is revealed.



Hockey-stick










share|cite|improve this question















After reading this question, the most popular answer use the identity
$$sum_{t=0}^n binom{t}{k} = binom{n+1}{k+1}.$$



What's the name of this identity? Is it the identity of the Pascal's triangle modified.



How can we prove it? I tried by induction, but without success. Can we also prove it algebraically?



Thanks for your help.





EDIT 01 : This identity is known as the hockey-stick identity because, on Pascal's triangle, when the addends represented in the summation and the sum itself are highlighted, a hockey-stick shape is revealed.



Hockey-stick







discrete-mathematics summation binomial-coefficients combinations faq






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 14 at 2:57









Trevor Gunn

13.8k32045




13.8k32045










asked Oct 21 '15 at 14:46









hlapointe

635721




635721








  • 6




    It is sometimes called the "hockey stick".
    – user940
    Oct 21 '15 at 15:24










  • There is another cute graphical illustration on the plane of $binom{n}{k}$
    – Eli Korvigo
    Oct 21 '15 at 16:54








  • 4




    It's pretty straightforward from the picture. Just switch the $1$ at the top of the stick with the $1$ directly below, then repeatedly replace adjacent numbers with the number in the cell below. This can be translated into a formal proof with words and symbols, but an animation or series of pictures is much more effective.
    – user2357112
    Oct 22 '15 at 3:24










  • See also this question. Some post which are linked there might be of interest, too.
    – Martin Sleziak
    Jan 18 '16 at 15:05














  • 6




    It is sometimes called the "hockey stick".
    – user940
    Oct 21 '15 at 15:24










  • There is another cute graphical illustration on the plane of $binom{n}{k}$
    – Eli Korvigo
    Oct 21 '15 at 16:54








  • 4




    It's pretty straightforward from the picture. Just switch the $1$ at the top of the stick with the $1$ directly below, then repeatedly replace adjacent numbers with the number in the cell below. This can be translated into a formal proof with words and symbols, but an animation or series of pictures is much more effective.
    – user2357112
    Oct 22 '15 at 3:24










  • See also this question. Some post which are linked there might be of interest, too.
    – Martin Sleziak
    Jan 18 '16 at 15:05








6




6




It is sometimes called the "hockey stick".
– user940
Oct 21 '15 at 15:24




It is sometimes called the "hockey stick".
– user940
Oct 21 '15 at 15:24












There is another cute graphical illustration on the plane of $binom{n}{k}$
– Eli Korvigo
Oct 21 '15 at 16:54






There is another cute graphical illustration on the plane of $binom{n}{k}$
– Eli Korvigo
Oct 21 '15 at 16:54






4




4




It's pretty straightforward from the picture. Just switch the $1$ at the top of the stick with the $1$ directly below, then repeatedly replace adjacent numbers with the number in the cell below. This can be translated into a formal proof with words and symbols, but an animation or series of pictures is much more effective.
– user2357112
Oct 22 '15 at 3:24




It's pretty straightforward from the picture. Just switch the $1$ at the top of the stick with the $1$ directly below, then repeatedly replace adjacent numbers with the number in the cell below. This can be translated into a formal proof with words and symbols, but an animation or series of pictures is much more effective.
– user2357112
Oct 22 '15 at 3:24












See also this question. Some post which are linked there might be of interest, too.
– Martin Sleziak
Jan 18 '16 at 15:05




See also this question. Some post which are linked there might be of interest, too.
– Martin Sleziak
Jan 18 '16 at 15:05










13 Answers
13






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
15
down vote



accepted










This is purely algebraic. First of all, since $dbinom{t}{k} =0$ when $k>t$ we can rewrite
$$binom{n+1}{k+1} = sum_{t=0}^{n} binom{t}{k}=sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}$$



Recall that (by the Pascal's Triangle),
$$binom{n}{k} = binom{n-1}{k-1} + binom{n-1}{k}$$



Hence
$$binom{t+1}{k+1} = binom{t}{k} + binom{t}{k+1} implies binom{t}{k} = binom{t+1}{k+1} - binom{t}{k+1}$$



Let's get this summed by $t$:
$$sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k} = sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t+1}{k+1} - sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k+1}$$



Let's factor out the last member of the first sum and the first member of the second sum:
$$sum _{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
=left( sum_{t=k}^{n-1} binom{t+1}{k+1} + binom{n+1}{k+1} right)
-left( sum_{t=k+1}^{n} binom{t}{k+1} + binom{k}{k+1} right)$$



Obviously $dbinom{k}{k+1} = 0$, hence we get
$$sum _{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
=binom{n+1}{k+1}
+sum_{t=k}^{n-1} binom{t+1}{k+1}
-sum_{t=k+1}^{n} binom{t}{k+1}$$



Let's introduce $t'=t-1$, then if $t=k+1 dots n, t'=k dots n-1$, hence
$$sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
= binom{n+1}{k+1}
+sum_{t=k}^{n-1} binom{t+1}{k+1}
-sum_{t'=k}^{n-1} binom{t'+1}{k+1}$$



The latter two arguments eliminate each other and you get the desired formulation
$$binom{n+1}{k+1}
= sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
= sum_{t=0}^{n} binom{t}{k}$$






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    Beautiful proof. p.-s. you can use the LaTeX command binom{n}{k} to display $binom{n}{k}$.
    – hlapointe
    Oct 21 '15 at 16:26












  • @hlapointe thank you. Sure, I forgot there was a special command for binomial.
    – Eli Korvigo
    Oct 21 '15 at 16:32


















up vote
21
down vote













Imagine the first $n + 1$ numbers, written in order on a piece of paper. The right hand side asks in how many ways you can pick $k+1$ of them. In how many ways can you do this?



You first pick a highest number, which you circle. Call it $s$. Next, you still have to pick $k$ numbers, each less than $s$, and there are $binom{s - 1}{k}$ ways to do this.



Since $s$ is ranging from $1$ to $n$, $t:= s-1$ is ranging from $0$ to $n$ as desired.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Do you mean $s$ is ranging from $1$ to $n+1$?
    – Rockstar5645
    Jun 2 '17 at 17:07


















up vote
15
down vote













$$begin{align}
sum_{t=color{blue}0}^n binom{t}{k} =sum_{t=color{blue}k}^nbinom tk&= sum_{t=k}^nleft[ binom {t+1}{k+1}-binom {t}{k+1}right]\
&=sum_{t=color{orange}k}^color{orange}nbinom {color{orange}{t+1}}{k+1}-sum_{t=k}^nbinom t{k+1}\
&=sum_{t=color{orange}{k+1}}^{color{orange}{n+1}}binom {color{orange}{t}}{k+1}-sum_{t=k}^nbinom t{k+1}\
&=binom{n+1}{k+1}-underbrace{binom k{k+1}}_0&&text{by telescoping}\
&=binom{n+1}{k+1}quadblacksquare\
end{align}$$






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    13
    down vote













    We can use the well known identity
    $$1+x+dots+x^n = frac{x^{n+1}-1}{x-1}.$$
    After substitution $x=1+t$ this becomes
    $$1+(1+t)+dots+(1+t)^n=frac{(1+t)^{n+1}-1}t.$$
    Both sides of these equations are polynomials in $t$. (Notice that the RHS simplifies to $sum_{j=1}^{n+1}binom {n+1}j t^{j-1}$.)



    If we compare coefficient of $t^{k}$ on the LHS and the RHS we see that
    $$binom 0k + binom 1k + dots + binom nk = binom{n+1}{k+1}.$$





    This proof is basically the same as the proof using generating functions, which was posted in other answers. However, I think it is phrased a bit differently. (And if it is formulated this way, even somebody who has never heard of generating functions can follow the proof.)






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      up vote
      11
      down vote













      You can use induction on $n$, observing that



      $$
      sum_{t=0}^{n+1} binom{t}{k}
      = sum_{t=0}^{n} binom{t}{k} + binom{n+1}{k}
      = binom{n+1}{k+1} + binom{n+1}{k}
      = binom{n+2}{k+1}
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer























      • How can you say that $sum_{t=0}^n binom{t}{k} = binom{n+1}{k+1}$ in your proof.
        – hlapointe
        Oct 21 '15 at 15:13










      • That's the inductive hypothesis.
        – Michael Biro
        Oct 21 '15 at 15:14










      • Ok. Can we prove it algebraically?
        – hlapointe
        Oct 21 '15 at 15:15










      • What's the first step!? Because if I take $n=1$, the hypothesis seem to be incorrect.
        – hlapointe
        Oct 21 '15 at 15:21










      • @hlapointe One choice of base case for every fixed $k$ is that $sum_{t=0}^{k} binom{t}{k} = binom{k}{k} = 1 = binom{k+1}{k+1}$.
        – Michael Biro
        Oct 21 '15 at 16:28




















      up vote
      8
      down vote













      The RHS is the number of $k+1$ subsets of ${1,2,...,n+1}$. Group them according to the largest element in the subset. Sum up all the cases. Get the LHS.






      share|cite|improve this answer




























        up vote
        6
        down vote













        Another technique is to use snake oil. Call your sum:



        $begin{align}
        S_k
        &= sum_{0 le t le n} binom{t}{k}
        end{align}$



        Define the generating function:



        $begin{align}
        S(z)
        &= sum_{k ge 0} S_k z^k \
        &= sum_{k ge 0} z^k sum_{0 le t le n} binom{t}{k} \
        &= sum_{0 le t le n} sum_{k ge 0} binom{t}{k} z^k \
        &= sum_{0 le t le n} (1 + z)^t \
        &= frac{(1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1}{(1 + z) - 1} \
        &= z^{-1} left( (1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1 right)
        end{align}$



        So we are interested in the coefficient of $z^k$ of this:



        $begin{align}
        [z^k] z^{-1} left( (1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1 right)
        &= [z^{k + 1}] left( (1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1 right) \
        &= binom{n + 1}{k + 1}
        end{align}$






        share|cite|improve this answer






























          up vote
          6
          down vote













          We can use the integral representation of the binomial coefficient $$dbinom{t}{k}=frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{left(1+zright)^{t}}{z^{k+1}}dztag{1}
          $$ and get $$sum_{t=0}^{n}dbinom{t}{k}=frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{sum_{k=0}^{n}left(1+zright)^{t}}{z^{k+1}}dz
          $$ $$=frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{left(z+1right)^{n+1}}{z^{k+2}}dz-frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{1}{z^{k+2}}dz
          $$ and so usign again $(1)$ we have $$sum_{t=0}^{n}dbinom{t}{k}=dbinom{n+1}{k+1}-0=color{red}{dbinom{n+1}{k+1}.}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 2




            It is so nice and weird. +1
            – Behrouz Maleki
            Jul 5 '16 at 10:27










          • +1. Nice work. You must subtract $displaystyle{delta_{k,-1}}$ in order to take account of the case $displaystyle{k = -1}$. When $displaystyle{k = -1}$, the LHS is equal to $displaystyle{0}$ and your RHS is equal to $displaystyle{1}$. With the $displaystyle{delta_{k,-1}}$ you'll get $displaystyle{1 - 1 = 0}$.
            – Felix Marin
            Jul 6 '16 at 21:50




















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          You remember that:
          $$
          (1+x)^m = sum_k binom{m}{k} x^k
          $$
          So the sum
          $$
          sum_{m=0}^M binom{m+k}{k}
          $$
          is the coefficient of $ x^k $ in:
          $$
          sum_{m=0}^M (1+x)^{m+k}
          $$ Yes?
          So now use the geometric series formula given:
          $$
          sum_{m=0}^M (1+x)^{m+k} = -frac{(1+x)^k}{x} left( 1 - (1+x)^{M+1} right)
          $$
          And now you want to know what is coefficient of $x^k $ in there. You got it from here.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            4
            down vote













            In this answer, I prove the identity
            $$
            binom{-n}{k}=(-1)^kbinom{n+k-1}{k}tag{1}
            $$
            Here is a generalization of the identity in question, proven using the Vandermonde Identity
            $$
            begin{align}
            sum_{m=0}^Mbinom{m+k}{k}binom{M-m}{n}
            &=sum_{m=0}^Mbinom{m+k}{m}binom{M-m}{M-m-n}tag{2}\
            &=sum_{m=0}^M(-1)^mbinom{-k-1}{m}(-1)^{M-m-n}binom{-n-1}{M-m-n}tag{3}\
            &=(-1)^{M-n}sum_{m=0}^Mbinom{-k-1}{m}binom{-n-1}{M-m-n}tag{4}\
            &=(-1)^{M-n}binom{-k-n-2}{M-n}tag{5}\
            &=binom{M+k+1}{M-n}tag{6}\
            &=binom{M+k+1}{n+k+1}tag{7}
            end{align}
            $$
            Explanation:

            $(2)$: $binom{n}{k}=binom{n}{n-k}$

            $(3)$: apply $(1)$ to each binomial coefficient

            $(4)$: combine the powers of $-1$ which can then be pulled out front

            $(5)$: apply Vandermonde

            $(6)$: apply $(1)$

            $(7)$: $binom{n}{k}=binom{n}{n-k}$



            To get the identity in the question, set $n=0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 2




              @FoF: I have added a link here and answered your other question. Thanks for mentioning the difficulty.
              – robjohn
              Dec 7 '13 at 12:33






            • 1




              @FoF: That is the Vandermonde Identity that I mentioned at the beginning.
              – robjohn
              Dec 8 '13 at 18:56








            • 1




              @FoF: I added an explanation for each line.
              – robjohn
              Dec 9 '13 at 2:20








            • 1




              I answered my own question about $(5, 6$) here.
              – NaN
              Dec 10 '13 at 8:54






            • 1




              @FoF: Ah. That is why I added the Explanation when I saw difficulty in following the argument.
              – robjohn
              Dec 11 '13 at 7:46




















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Recall that for $kinBbb N$ we have the generating function



            $$sum_{nge 0}binom{n+k}kx^n=frac1{(1-x)^{k+1}};.$$



            The identity in the question can therefore be rewritten as



            $$left(sum_{nge 0}binom{n+k}kx^nright)left(sum_{nge 0}x^nright)=sum_{nge 0}binom{n+k+1}{k+1}x^n;.$$



            The coefficient of $x^n$ in the product on the left is



            $$sum_{i=0}^nbinom{i+k}kcdot1=sum_{i=0}^nbinom{i+k}k;,$$



            and the $n$-th term of the discrete convolution of the sequences $leftlanglebinom{n+k}k:ninBbb Nrightrangle$ and $langle 1,1,1,dotsrangle$. And at this point you’re practically done.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Is there a typo in the second equation (first sum)? I believe $k$ should be indexed.
              – AlanH
              May 27 '13 at 6:20












            • @Alan: No, the sum is over $n$; $k$ is fixed throughout.
              – Brian M. Scott
              May 27 '13 at 7:19










            • In my text, I have an identity $sum_{rgeq 0} binom{r + n}{r} x^r = 1/(1-x)^{n+1}$ This may be the cause of my confusion, but is this identity correct and is it equivalent to the one you used?
              – AlanH
              May 27 '13 at 8:22










            • @Alan: Sure: your $r$ is my $n$, and your $n$ is my $k$.
              – Brian M. Scott
              May 27 '13 at 8:28






            • 1




              @Alan: $binom{r+n}r=binom{r+n}n$; now do the translation. (Sorry: I didn’t notice before that you’d used the symmetrically opposite binomial coefficient.)
              – Brian M. Scott
              May 27 '13 at 19:19


















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            A standard technique to prove such identities $sum_{i=0}^Mf(i)=F(M)$, involving on one hand a sum where only the upper bound $M$ is variable and on the other hand an explicit expression in terms of$~M$, is to use induction on$~M$. It amounts to showing that $f(M)=F(M)-F(M-1)$ (and that $F(0)=f(0)$). This is similar to using the fundamental theorem of calculus in showing that $int_0^{x_0}f(x)mathrm dx=F(x_0)$ by establishing $f(x)=F'(x)$ (and $F(0)=0$).



            So here you need to check (apart from the obvious starting case $M=0$) that $binom{M+k}k=binom{M+k+1}{k+1}-binom{M+k}{k+1}$. This is just in instance of Pascal's recurrence for binomial coefficients.






            share|cite|improve this answer






























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              $newcommand{angles}[1]{leftlangle,{#1},rightrangle}
              newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
              newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
              newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
              newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
              newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
              newcommand{half}{{1 over 2}}
              newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
              newcommand{iff}{Leftrightarrow}
              newcommand{imp}{Longrightarrow}
              newcommand{ol}[1]{overline{#1}}
              newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
              newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
              newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
              newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
              newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
              Assuming $ds{M geq 0}$:




              begin{equation}
              mbox{Note that}quad
              sum_{m = 0}^{M}{m + k choose k} = sum_{m = k}^{M + k}{m choose k} =
              a_{M + k} - a_{k - 1}quadmbox{where}quad a_{n} equiv
              sum_{m = 0}^{n}{m choose k}tag{1}
              end{equation}







              Then,
              begin{align}
              color{#f00}{a_{n}} & equiv sum_{m = 0}^{n}{m choose k} =
              sum_{m = 0}^{n} overbrace{%
              oint_{verts{z} = 1}{pars{1 + z}^{m} over z^{k + 1}},{dd z over 2piic}}
              ^{ds{m choose k}} =
              oint_{verts{z} = 1}{1 over z^{k + 1}}sum_{m = 0}^{n}pars{1 + z}^{m}
              ,{dd z over 2piic}
              \[3mm] & =
              oint_{verts{z} = 1}{1 over z^{k + 1}},
              {pars{1 + z}^{n + 1} - 1 over pars{1 + z} - 1},{dd z over 2piic} =
              underbrace{oint_{verts{z} = 1}{pars{1 + z}^{n + 1} over z^{k + 2}}
              ,{dd z over 2piic}}_{ds{n + 1 choose k + 1}} -
              underbrace{oint_{verts{z} = 1}{1 over z^{k + 2}},{dd z over 2piic}}
              _{ds{delta_{k + 2,1}}}
              \[8mm] imp color{#f00}{a_{n}} & = fbox{$ds{quad%
              {n + 1 choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}quad}$}
              end{align}


              begin{align}
              mbox{With} pars{1},,quad
              color{#f00}{sum_{m = 0}^{M}{m + k choose k}} & =
              bracks{{M + k + 1 choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}} -
              bracks{{k choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}}
              \[3mm] & =
              {M + k + 1 choose k + 1} - {k choose k + 1}
              end{align}
              Thanks to $ds{@robjohn}$ user who pointed out the following feature:
              $$
              {k choose k + 1} = {-k + k + 1 - 1 choose k + 1}pars{-1}^{k + 1} =
              -pars{-1}^{k}{0 choose k + 1} = delta_{k,-1}
              $$
              such that
              $$
              begin{array}{|c|}hlinembox{}\
              ds{quadcolor{#f00}{sum_{m = 0}^{M}{m + k choose k}} =
              color{#f00}{{M + k + 1 choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}}quad}
              \ mbox{}\ hline
              end{array}
              $$




              share|cite|improve this answer























              • Since $k=-1$ is covered in the first part, it should be noted that since $binom{-1}{0}=1$, $$binom{k}{k+1}-delta_{k,-1}=0$$ therefore the final answer seems it should be $$binom{M+k+1}{k+1}-delta_{k,-1}$$
                – robjohn
                Jul 25 '16 at 13:00










              • @robjohn Thanks. I'm checking everything right now.
                – Felix Marin
                Jul 25 '16 at 21:48










              • @robjohn Thanks. Fixed.
                – Felix Marin
                Jul 25 '16 at 22:09











              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1490794%2fproof-of-the-hockey-stick-identity-sum-limits-t-0n-binom-tk-binomn1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              13 Answers
              13






              active

              oldest

              votes








              13 Answers
              13






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              15
              down vote



              accepted










              This is purely algebraic. First of all, since $dbinom{t}{k} =0$ when $k>t$ we can rewrite
              $$binom{n+1}{k+1} = sum_{t=0}^{n} binom{t}{k}=sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}$$



              Recall that (by the Pascal's Triangle),
              $$binom{n}{k} = binom{n-1}{k-1} + binom{n-1}{k}$$



              Hence
              $$binom{t+1}{k+1} = binom{t}{k} + binom{t}{k+1} implies binom{t}{k} = binom{t+1}{k+1} - binom{t}{k+1}$$



              Let's get this summed by $t$:
              $$sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k} = sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t+1}{k+1} - sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k+1}$$



              Let's factor out the last member of the first sum and the first member of the second sum:
              $$sum _{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
              =left( sum_{t=k}^{n-1} binom{t+1}{k+1} + binom{n+1}{k+1} right)
              -left( sum_{t=k+1}^{n} binom{t}{k+1} + binom{k}{k+1} right)$$



              Obviously $dbinom{k}{k+1} = 0$, hence we get
              $$sum _{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
              =binom{n+1}{k+1}
              +sum_{t=k}^{n-1} binom{t+1}{k+1}
              -sum_{t=k+1}^{n} binom{t}{k+1}$$



              Let's introduce $t'=t-1$, then if $t=k+1 dots n, t'=k dots n-1$, hence
              $$sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
              = binom{n+1}{k+1}
              +sum_{t=k}^{n-1} binom{t+1}{k+1}
              -sum_{t'=k}^{n-1} binom{t'+1}{k+1}$$



              The latter two arguments eliminate each other and you get the desired formulation
              $$binom{n+1}{k+1}
              = sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
              = sum_{t=0}^{n} binom{t}{k}$$






              share|cite|improve this answer



















              • 1




                Beautiful proof. p.-s. you can use the LaTeX command binom{n}{k} to display $binom{n}{k}$.
                – hlapointe
                Oct 21 '15 at 16:26












              • @hlapointe thank you. Sure, I forgot there was a special command for binomial.
                – Eli Korvigo
                Oct 21 '15 at 16:32















              up vote
              15
              down vote



              accepted










              This is purely algebraic. First of all, since $dbinom{t}{k} =0$ when $k>t$ we can rewrite
              $$binom{n+1}{k+1} = sum_{t=0}^{n} binom{t}{k}=sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}$$



              Recall that (by the Pascal's Triangle),
              $$binom{n}{k} = binom{n-1}{k-1} + binom{n-1}{k}$$



              Hence
              $$binom{t+1}{k+1} = binom{t}{k} + binom{t}{k+1} implies binom{t}{k} = binom{t+1}{k+1} - binom{t}{k+1}$$



              Let's get this summed by $t$:
              $$sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k} = sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t+1}{k+1} - sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k+1}$$



              Let's factor out the last member of the first sum and the first member of the second sum:
              $$sum _{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
              =left( sum_{t=k}^{n-1} binom{t+1}{k+1} + binom{n+1}{k+1} right)
              -left( sum_{t=k+1}^{n} binom{t}{k+1} + binom{k}{k+1} right)$$



              Obviously $dbinom{k}{k+1} = 0$, hence we get
              $$sum _{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
              =binom{n+1}{k+1}
              +sum_{t=k}^{n-1} binom{t+1}{k+1}
              -sum_{t=k+1}^{n} binom{t}{k+1}$$



              Let's introduce $t'=t-1$, then if $t=k+1 dots n, t'=k dots n-1$, hence
              $$sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
              = binom{n+1}{k+1}
              +sum_{t=k}^{n-1} binom{t+1}{k+1}
              -sum_{t'=k}^{n-1} binom{t'+1}{k+1}$$



              The latter two arguments eliminate each other and you get the desired formulation
              $$binom{n+1}{k+1}
              = sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
              = sum_{t=0}^{n} binom{t}{k}$$






              share|cite|improve this answer



















              • 1




                Beautiful proof. p.-s. you can use the LaTeX command binom{n}{k} to display $binom{n}{k}$.
                – hlapointe
                Oct 21 '15 at 16:26












              • @hlapointe thank you. Sure, I forgot there was a special command for binomial.
                – Eli Korvigo
                Oct 21 '15 at 16:32













              up vote
              15
              down vote



              accepted







              up vote
              15
              down vote



              accepted






              This is purely algebraic. First of all, since $dbinom{t}{k} =0$ when $k>t$ we can rewrite
              $$binom{n+1}{k+1} = sum_{t=0}^{n} binom{t}{k}=sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}$$



              Recall that (by the Pascal's Triangle),
              $$binom{n}{k} = binom{n-1}{k-1} + binom{n-1}{k}$$



              Hence
              $$binom{t+1}{k+1} = binom{t}{k} + binom{t}{k+1} implies binom{t}{k} = binom{t+1}{k+1} - binom{t}{k+1}$$



              Let's get this summed by $t$:
              $$sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k} = sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t+1}{k+1} - sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k+1}$$



              Let's factor out the last member of the first sum and the first member of the second sum:
              $$sum _{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
              =left( sum_{t=k}^{n-1} binom{t+1}{k+1} + binom{n+1}{k+1} right)
              -left( sum_{t=k+1}^{n} binom{t}{k+1} + binom{k}{k+1} right)$$



              Obviously $dbinom{k}{k+1} = 0$, hence we get
              $$sum _{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
              =binom{n+1}{k+1}
              +sum_{t=k}^{n-1} binom{t+1}{k+1}
              -sum_{t=k+1}^{n} binom{t}{k+1}$$



              Let's introduce $t'=t-1$, then if $t=k+1 dots n, t'=k dots n-1$, hence
              $$sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
              = binom{n+1}{k+1}
              +sum_{t=k}^{n-1} binom{t+1}{k+1}
              -sum_{t'=k}^{n-1} binom{t'+1}{k+1}$$



              The latter two arguments eliminate each other and you get the desired formulation
              $$binom{n+1}{k+1}
              = sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
              = sum_{t=0}^{n} binom{t}{k}$$






              share|cite|improve this answer














              This is purely algebraic. First of all, since $dbinom{t}{k} =0$ when $k>t$ we can rewrite
              $$binom{n+1}{k+1} = sum_{t=0}^{n} binom{t}{k}=sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}$$



              Recall that (by the Pascal's Triangle),
              $$binom{n}{k} = binom{n-1}{k-1} + binom{n-1}{k}$$



              Hence
              $$binom{t+1}{k+1} = binom{t}{k} + binom{t}{k+1} implies binom{t}{k} = binom{t+1}{k+1} - binom{t}{k+1}$$



              Let's get this summed by $t$:
              $$sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k} = sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t+1}{k+1} - sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k+1}$$



              Let's factor out the last member of the first sum and the first member of the second sum:
              $$sum _{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
              =left( sum_{t=k}^{n-1} binom{t+1}{k+1} + binom{n+1}{k+1} right)
              -left( sum_{t=k+1}^{n} binom{t}{k+1} + binom{k}{k+1} right)$$



              Obviously $dbinom{k}{k+1} = 0$, hence we get
              $$sum _{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
              =binom{n+1}{k+1}
              +sum_{t=k}^{n-1} binom{t+1}{k+1}
              -sum_{t=k+1}^{n} binom{t}{k+1}$$



              Let's introduce $t'=t-1$, then if $t=k+1 dots n, t'=k dots n-1$, hence
              $$sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
              = binom{n+1}{k+1}
              +sum_{t=k}^{n-1} binom{t+1}{k+1}
              -sum_{t'=k}^{n-1} binom{t'+1}{k+1}$$



              The latter two arguments eliminate each other and you get the desired formulation
              $$binom{n+1}{k+1}
              = sum_{t=k}^{n} binom{t}{k}
              = sum_{t=0}^{n} binom{t}{k}$$







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited Sep 10 at 6:02

























              answered Oct 21 '15 at 15:48









              Eli Korvigo

              315110




              315110








              • 1




                Beautiful proof. p.-s. you can use the LaTeX command binom{n}{k} to display $binom{n}{k}$.
                – hlapointe
                Oct 21 '15 at 16:26












              • @hlapointe thank you. Sure, I forgot there was a special command for binomial.
                – Eli Korvigo
                Oct 21 '15 at 16:32














              • 1




                Beautiful proof. p.-s. you can use the LaTeX command binom{n}{k} to display $binom{n}{k}$.
                – hlapointe
                Oct 21 '15 at 16:26












              • @hlapointe thank you. Sure, I forgot there was a special command for binomial.
                – Eli Korvigo
                Oct 21 '15 at 16:32








              1




              1




              Beautiful proof. p.-s. you can use the LaTeX command binom{n}{k} to display $binom{n}{k}$.
              – hlapointe
              Oct 21 '15 at 16:26






              Beautiful proof. p.-s. you can use the LaTeX command binom{n}{k} to display $binom{n}{k}$.
              – hlapointe
              Oct 21 '15 at 16:26














              @hlapointe thank you. Sure, I forgot there was a special command for binomial.
              – Eli Korvigo
              Oct 21 '15 at 16:32




              @hlapointe thank you. Sure, I forgot there was a special command for binomial.
              – Eli Korvigo
              Oct 21 '15 at 16:32










              up vote
              21
              down vote













              Imagine the first $n + 1$ numbers, written in order on a piece of paper. The right hand side asks in how many ways you can pick $k+1$ of them. In how many ways can you do this?



              You first pick a highest number, which you circle. Call it $s$. Next, you still have to pick $k$ numbers, each less than $s$, and there are $binom{s - 1}{k}$ ways to do this.



              Since $s$ is ranging from $1$ to $n$, $t:= s-1$ is ranging from $0$ to $n$ as desired.






              share|cite|improve this answer





















              • Do you mean $s$ is ranging from $1$ to $n+1$?
                – Rockstar5645
                Jun 2 '17 at 17:07















              up vote
              21
              down vote













              Imagine the first $n + 1$ numbers, written in order on a piece of paper. The right hand side asks in how many ways you can pick $k+1$ of them. In how many ways can you do this?



              You first pick a highest number, which you circle. Call it $s$. Next, you still have to pick $k$ numbers, each less than $s$, and there are $binom{s - 1}{k}$ ways to do this.



              Since $s$ is ranging from $1$ to $n$, $t:= s-1$ is ranging from $0$ to $n$ as desired.






              share|cite|improve this answer





















              • Do you mean $s$ is ranging from $1$ to $n+1$?
                – Rockstar5645
                Jun 2 '17 at 17:07













              up vote
              21
              down vote










              up vote
              21
              down vote









              Imagine the first $n + 1$ numbers, written in order on a piece of paper. The right hand side asks in how many ways you can pick $k+1$ of them. In how many ways can you do this?



              You first pick a highest number, which you circle. Call it $s$. Next, you still have to pick $k$ numbers, each less than $s$, and there are $binom{s - 1}{k}$ ways to do this.



              Since $s$ is ranging from $1$ to $n$, $t:= s-1$ is ranging from $0$ to $n$ as desired.






              share|cite|improve this answer












              Imagine the first $n + 1$ numbers, written in order on a piece of paper. The right hand side asks in how many ways you can pick $k+1$ of them. In how many ways can you do this?



              You first pick a highest number, which you circle. Call it $s$. Next, you still have to pick $k$ numbers, each less than $s$, and there are $binom{s - 1}{k}$ ways to do this.



              Since $s$ is ranging from $1$ to $n$, $t:= s-1$ is ranging from $0$ to $n$ as desired.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Oct 21 '15 at 16:30









              hunter

              14k22437




              14k22437












              • Do you mean $s$ is ranging from $1$ to $n+1$?
                – Rockstar5645
                Jun 2 '17 at 17:07


















              • Do you mean $s$ is ranging from $1$ to $n+1$?
                – Rockstar5645
                Jun 2 '17 at 17:07
















              Do you mean $s$ is ranging from $1$ to $n+1$?
              – Rockstar5645
              Jun 2 '17 at 17:07




              Do you mean $s$ is ranging from $1$ to $n+1$?
              – Rockstar5645
              Jun 2 '17 at 17:07










              up vote
              15
              down vote













              $$begin{align}
              sum_{t=color{blue}0}^n binom{t}{k} =sum_{t=color{blue}k}^nbinom tk&= sum_{t=k}^nleft[ binom {t+1}{k+1}-binom {t}{k+1}right]\
              &=sum_{t=color{orange}k}^color{orange}nbinom {color{orange}{t+1}}{k+1}-sum_{t=k}^nbinom t{k+1}\
              &=sum_{t=color{orange}{k+1}}^{color{orange}{n+1}}binom {color{orange}{t}}{k+1}-sum_{t=k}^nbinom t{k+1}\
              &=binom{n+1}{k+1}-underbrace{binom k{k+1}}_0&&text{by telescoping}\
              &=binom{n+1}{k+1}quadblacksquare\
              end{align}$$






              share|cite|improve this answer



























                up vote
                15
                down vote













                $$begin{align}
                sum_{t=color{blue}0}^n binom{t}{k} =sum_{t=color{blue}k}^nbinom tk&= sum_{t=k}^nleft[ binom {t+1}{k+1}-binom {t}{k+1}right]\
                &=sum_{t=color{orange}k}^color{orange}nbinom {color{orange}{t+1}}{k+1}-sum_{t=k}^nbinom t{k+1}\
                &=sum_{t=color{orange}{k+1}}^{color{orange}{n+1}}binom {color{orange}{t}}{k+1}-sum_{t=k}^nbinom t{k+1}\
                &=binom{n+1}{k+1}-underbrace{binom k{k+1}}_0&&text{by telescoping}\
                &=binom{n+1}{k+1}quadblacksquare\
                end{align}$$






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  15
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  15
                  down vote









                  $$begin{align}
                  sum_{t=color{blue}0}^n binom{t}{k} =sum_{t=color{blue}k}^nbinom tk&= sum_{t=k}^nleft[ binom {t+1}{k+1}-binom {t}{k+1}right]\
                  &=sum_{t=color{orange}k}^color{orange}nbinom {color{orange}{t+1}}{k+1}-sum_{t=k}^nbinom t{k+1}\
                  &=sum_{t=color{orange}{k+1}}^{color{orange}{n+1}}binom {color{orange}{t}}{k+1}-sum_{t=k}^nbinom t{k+1}\
                  &=binom{n+1}{k+1}-underbrace{binom k{k+1}}_0&&text{by telescoping}\
                  &=binom{n+1}{k+1}quadblacksquare\
                  end{align}$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  $$begin{align}
                  sum_{t=color{blue}0}^n binom{t}{k} =sum_{t=color{blue}k}^nbinom tk&= sum_{t=k}^nleft[ binom {t+1}{k+1}-binom {t}{k+1}right]\
                  &=sum_{t=color{orange}k}^color{orange}nbinom {color{orange}{t+1}}{k+1}-sum_{t=k}^nbinom t{k+1}\
                  &=sum_{t=color{orange}{k+1}}^{color{orange}{n+1}}binom {color{orange}{t}}{k+1}-sum_{t=k}^nbinom t{k+1}\
                  &=binom{n+1}{k+1}-underbrace{binom k{k+1}}_0&&text{by telescoping}\
                  &=binom{n+1}{k+1}quadblacksquare\
                  end{align}$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jul 5 '16 at 7:07

























                  answered Oct 21 '15 at 16:02









                  hypergeometric

                  17.4k1755




                  17.4k1755






















                      up vote
                      13
                      down vote













                      We can use the well known identity
                      $$1+x+dots+x^n = frac{x^{n+1}-1}{x-1}.$$
                      After substitution $x=1+t$ this becomes
                      $$1+(1+t)+dots+(1+t)^n=frac{(1+t)^{n+1}-1}t.$$
                      Both sides of these equations are polynomials in $t$. (Notice that the RHS simplifies to $sum_{j=1}^{n+1}binom {n+1}j t^{j-1}$.)



                      If we compare coefficient of $t^{k}$ on the LHS and the RHS we see that
                      $$binom 0k + binom 1k + dots + binom nk = binom{n+1}{k+1}.$$





                      This proof is basically the same as the proof using generating functions, which was posted in other answers. However, I think it is phrased a bit differently. (And if it is formulated this way, even somebody who has never heard of generating functions can follow the proof.)






                      share|cite|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        13
                        down vote













                        We can use the well known identity
                        $$1+x+dots+x^n = frac{x^{n+1}-1}{x-1}.$$
                        After substitution $x=1+t$ this becomes
                        $$1+(1+t)+dots+(1+t)^n=frac{(1+t)^{n+1}-1}t.$$
                        Both sides of these equations are polynomials in $t$. (Notice that the RHS simplifies to $sum_{j=1}^{n+1}binom {n+1}j t^{j-1}$.)



                        If we compare coefficient of $t^{k}$ on the LHS and the RHS we see that
                        $$binom 0k + binom 1k + dots + binom nk = binom{n+1}{k+1}.$$





                        This proof is basically the same as the proof using generating functions, which was posted in other answers. However, I think it is phrased a bit differently. (And if it is formulated this way, even somebody who has never heard of generating functions can follow the proof.)






                        share|cite|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          13
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          13
                          down vote









                          We can use the well known identity
                          $$1+x+dots+x^n = frac{x^{n+1}-1}{x-1}.$$
                          After substitution $x=1+t$ this becomes
                          $$1+(1+t)+dots+(1+t)^n=frac{(1+t)^{n+1}-1}t.$$
                          Both sides of these equations are polynomials in $t$. (Notice that the RHS simplifies to $sum_{j=1}^{n+1}binom {n+1}j t^{j-1}$.)



                          If we compare coefficient of $t^{k}$ on the LHS and the RHS we see that
                          $$binom 0k + binom 1k + dots + binom nk = binom{n+1}{k+1}.$$





                          This proof is basically the same as the proof using generating functions, which was posted in other answers. However, I think it is phrased a bit differently. (And if it is formulated this way, even somebody who has never heard of generating functions can follow the proof.)






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          We can use the well known identity
                          $$1+x+dots+x^n = frac{x^{n+1}-1}{x-1}.$$
                          After substitution $x=1+t$ this becomes
                          $$1+(1+t)+dots+(1+t)^n=frac{(1+t)^{n+1}-1}t.$$
                          Both sides of these equations are polynomials in $t$. (Notice that the RHS simplifies to $sum_{j=1}^{n+1}binom {n+1}j t^{j-1}$.)



                          If we compare coefficient of $t^{k}$ on the LHS and the RHS we see that
                          $$binom 0k + binom 1k + dots + binom nk = binom{n+1}{k+1}.$$





                          This proof is basically the same as the proof using generating functions, which was posted in other answers. However, I think it is phrased a bit differently. (And if it is formulated this way, even somebody who has never heard of generating functions can follow the proof.)







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Jan 18 '16 at 13:45









                          Martin Sleziak

                          44.4k7115268




                          44.4k7115268






















                              up vote
                              11
                              down vote













                              You can use induction on $n$, observing that



                              $$
                              sum_{t=0}^{n+1} binom{t}{k}
                              = sum_{t=0}^{n} binom{t}{k} + binom{n+1}{k}
                              = binom{n+1}{k+1} + binom{n+1}{k}
                              = binom{n+2}{k+1}
                              $$






                              share|cite|improve this answer























                              • How can you say that $sum_{t=0}^n binom{t}{k} = binom{n+1}{k+1}$ in your proof.
                                – hlapointe
                                Oct 21 '15 at 15:13










                              • That's the inductive hypothesis.
                                – Michael Biro
                                Oct 21 '15 at 15:14










                              • Ok. Can we prove it algebraically?
                                – hlapointe
                                Oct 21 '15 at 15:15










                              • What's the first step!? Because if I take $n=1$, the hypothesis seem to be incorrect.
                                – hlapointe
                                Oct 21 '15 at 15:21










                              • @hlapointe One choice of base case for every fixed $k$ is that $sum_{t=0}^{k} binom{t}{k} = binom{k}{k} = 1 = binom{k+1}{k+1}$.
                                – Michael Biro
                                Oct 21 '15 at 16:28

















                              up vote
                              11
                              down vote













                              You can use induction on $n$, observing that



                              $$
                              sum_{t=0}^{n+1} binom{t}{k}
                              = sum_{t=0}^{n} binom{t}{k} + binom{n+1}{k}
                              = binom{n+1}{k+1} + binom{n+1}{k}
                              = binom{n+2}{k+1}
                              $$






                              share|cite|improve this answer























                              • How can you say that $sum_{t=0}^n binom{t}{k} = binom{n+1}{k+1}$ in your proof.
                                – hlapointe
                                Oct 21 '15 at 15:13










                              • That's the inductive hypothesis.
                                – Michael Biro
                                Oct 21 '15 at 15:14










                              • Ok. Can we prove it algebraically?
                                – hlapointe
                                Oct 21 '15 at 15:15










                              • What's the first step!? Because if I take $n=1$, the hypothesis seem to be incorrect.
                                – hlapointe
                                Oct 21 '15 at 15:21










                              • @hlapointe One choice of base case for every fixed $k$ is that $sum_{t=0}^{k} binom{t}{k} = binom{k}{k} = 1 = binom{k+1}{k+1}$.
                                – Michael Biro
                                Oct 21 '15 at 16:28















                              up vote
                              11
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              11
                              down vote









                              You can use induction on $n$, observing that



                              $$
                              sum_{t=0}^{n+1} binom{t}{k}
                              = sum_{t=0}^{n} binom{t}{k} + binom{n+1}{k}
                              = binom{n+1}{k+1} + binom{n+1}{k}
                              = binom{n+2}{k+1}
                              $$






                              share|cite|improve this answer














                              You can use induction on $n$, observing that



                              $$
                              sum_{t=0}^{n+1} binom{t}{k}
                              = sum_{t=0}^{n} binom{t}{k} + binom{n+1}{k}
                              = binom{n+1}{k+1} + binom{n+1}{k}
                              = binom{n+2}{k+1}
                              $$







                              share|cite|improve this answer














                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer








                              edited Oct 21 '15 at 15:13









                              hlapointe

                              635721




                              635721










                              answered Oct 21 '15 at 15:08









                              Michael Biro

                              10.8k21731




                              10.8k21731












                              • How can you say that $sum_{t=0}^n binom{t}{k} = binom{n+1}{k+1}$ in your proof.
                                – hlapointe
                                Oct 21 '15 at 15:13










                              • That's the inductive hypothesis.
                                – Michael Biro
                                Oct 21 '15 at 15:14










                              • Ok. Can we prove it algebraically?
                                – hlapointe
                                Oct 21 '15 at 15:15










                              • What's the first step!? Because if I take $n=1$, the hypothesis seem to be incorrect.
                                – hlapointe
                                Oct 21 '15 at 15:21










                              • @hlapointe One choice of base case for every fixed $k$ is that $sum_{t=0}^{k} binom{t}{k} = binom{k}{k} = 1 = binom{k+1}{k+1}$.
                                – Michael Biro
                                Oct 21 '15 at 16:28




















                              • How can you say that $sum_{t=0}^n binom{t}{k} = binom{n+1}{k+1}$ in your proof.
                                – hlapointe
                                Oct 21 '15 at 15:13










                              • That's the inductive hypothesis.
                                – Michael Biro
                                Oct 21 '15 at 15:14










                              • Ok. Can we prove it algebraically?
                                – hlapointe
                                Oct 21 '15 at 15:15










                              • What's the first step!? Because if I take $n=1$, the hypothesis seem to be incorrect.
                                – hlapointe
                                Oct 21 '15 at 15:21










                              • @hlapointe One choice of base case for every fixed $k$ is that $sum_{t=0}^{k} binom{t}{k} = binom{k}{k} = 1 = binom{k+1}{k+1}$.
                                – Michael Biro
                                Oct 21 '15 at 16:28


















                              How can you say that $sum_{t=0}^n binom{t}{k} = binom{n+1}{k+1}$ in your proof.
                              – hlapointe
                              Oct 21 '15 at 15:13




                              How can you say that $sum_{t=0}^n binom{t}{k} = binom{n+1}{k+1}$ in your proof.
                              – hlapointe
                              Oct 21 '15 at 15:13












                              That's the inductive hypothesis.
                              – Michael Biro
                              Oct 21 '15 at 15:14




                              That's the inductive hypothesis.
                              – Michael Biro
                              Oct 21 '15 at 15:14












                              Ok. Can we prove it algebraically?
                              – hlapointe
                              Oct 21 '15 at 15:15




                              Ok. Can we prove it algebraically?
                              – hlapointe
                              Oct 21 '15 at 15:15












                              What's the first step!? Because if I take $n=1$, the hypothesis seem to be incorrect.
                              – hlapointe
                              Oct 21 '15 at 15:21




                              What's the first step!? Because if I take $n=1$, the hypothesis seem to be incorrect.
                              – hlapointe
                              Oct 21 '15 at 15:21












                              @hlapointe One choice of base case for every fixed $k$ is that $sum_{t=0}^{k} binom{t}{k} = binom{k}{k} = 1 = binom{k+1}{k+1}$.
                              – Michael Biro
                              Oct 21 '15 at 16:28






                              @hlapointe One choice of base case for every fixed $k$ is that $sum_{t=0}^{k} binom{t}{k} = binom{k}{k} = 1 = binom{k+1}{k+1}$.
                              – Michael Biro
                              Oct 21 '15 at 16:28












                              up vote
                              8
                              down vote













                              The RHS is the number of $k+1$ subsets of ${1,2,...,n+1}$. Group them according to the largest element in the subset. Sum up all the cases. Get the LHS.






                              share|cite|improve this answer

























                                up vote
                                8
                                down vote













                                The RHS is the number of $k+1$ subsets of ${1,2,...,n+1}$. Group them according to the largest element in the subset. Sum up all the cases. Get the LHS.






                                share|cite|improve this answer























                                  up vote
                                  8
                                  down vote










                                  up vote
                                  8
                                  down vote









                                  The RHS is the number of $k+1$ subsets of ${1,2,...,n+1}$. Group them according to the largest element in the subset. Sum up all the cases. Get the LHS.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer












                                  The RHS is the number of $k+1$ subsets of ${1,2,...,n+1}$. Group them according to the largest element in the subset. Sum up all the cases. Get the LHS.







                                  share|cite|improve this answer












                                  share|cite|improve this answer



                                  share|cite|improve this answer










                                  answered Oct 22 '15 at 2:13









                                  Milan

                                  1414




                                  1414






















                                      up vote
                                      6
                                      down vote













                                      Another technique is to use snake oil. Call your sum:



                                      $begin{align}
                                      S_k
                                      &= sum_{0 le t le n} binom{t}{k}
                                      end{align}$



                                      Define the generating function:



                                      $begin{align}
                                      S(z)
                                      &= sum_{k ge 0} S_k z^k \
                                      &= sum_{k ge 0} z^k sum_{0 le t le n} binom{t}{k} \
                                      &= sum_{0 le t le n} sum_{k ge 0} binom{t}{k} z^k \
                                      &= sum_{0 le t le n} (1 + z)^t \
                                      &= frac{(1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1}{(1 + z) - 1} \
                                      &= z^{-1} left( (1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1 right)
                                      end{align}$



                                      So we are interested in the coefficient of $z^k$ of this:



                                      $begin{align}
                                      [z^k] z^{-1} left( (1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1 right)
                                      &= [z^{k + 1}] left( (1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1 right) \
                                      &= binom{n + 1}{k + 1}
                                      end{align}$






                                      share|cite|improve this answer



























                                        up vote
                                        6
                                        down vote













                                        Another technique is to use snake oil. Call your sum:



                                        $begin{align}
                                        S_k
                                        &= sum_{0 le t le n} binom{t}{k}
                                        end{align}$



                                        Define the generating function:



                                        $begin{align}
                                        S(z)
                                        &= sum_{k ge 0} S_k z^k \
                                        &= sum_{k ge 0} z^k sum_{0 le t le n} binom{t}{k} \
                                        &= sum_{0 le t le n} sum_{k ge 0} binom{t}{k} z^k \
                                        &= sum_{0 le t le n} (1 + z)^t \
                                        &= frac{(1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1}{(1 + z) - 1} \
                                        &= z^{-1} left( (1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1 right)
                                        end{align}$



                                        So we are interested in the coefficient of $z^k$ of this:



                                        $begin{align}
                                        [z^k] z^{-1} left( (1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1 right)
                                        &= [z^{k + 1}] left( (1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1 right) \
                                        &= binom{n + 1}{k + 1}
                                        end{align}$






                                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                                          up vote
                                          6
                                          down vote










                                          up vote
                                          6
                                          down vote









                                          Another technique is to use snake oil. Call your sum:



                                          $begin{align}
                                          S_k
                                          &= sum_{0 le t le n} binom{t}{k}
                                          end{align}$



                                          Define the generating function:



                                          $begin{align}
                                          S(z)
                                          &= sum_{k ge 0} S_k z^k \
                                          &= sum_{k ge 0} z^k sum_{0 le t le n} binom{t}{k} \
                                          &= sum_{0 le t le n} sum_{k ge 0} binom{t}{k} z^k \
                                          &= sum_{0 le t le n} (1 + z)^t \
                                          &= frac{(1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1}{(1 + z) - 1} \
                                          &= z^{-1} left( (1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1 right)
                                          end{align}$



                                          So we are interested in the coefficient of $z^k$ of this:



                                          $begin{align}
                                          [z^k] z^{-1} left( (1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1 right)
                                          &= [z^{k + 1}] left( (1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1 right) \
                                          &= binom{n + 1}{k + 1}
                                          end{align}$






                                          share|cite|improve this answer














                                          Another technique is to use snake oil. Call your sum:



                                          $begin{align}
                                          S_k
                                          &= sum_{0 le t le n} binom{t}{k}
                                          end{align}$



                                          Define the generating function:



                                          $begin{align}
                                          S(z)
                                          &= sum_{k ge 0} S_k z^k \
                                          &= sum_{k ge 0} z^k sum_{0 le t le n} binom{t}{k} \
                                          &= sum_{0 le t le n} sum_{k ge 0} binom{t}{k} z^k \
                                          &= sum_{0 le t le n} (1 + z)^t \
                                          &= frac{(1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1}{(1 + z) - 1} \
                                          &= z^{-1} left( (1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1 right)
                                          end{align}$



                                          So we are interested in the coefficient of $z^k$ of this:



                                          $begin{align}
                                          [z^k] z^{-1} left( (1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1 right)
                                          &= [z^{k + 1}] left( (1 + z)^{n + 1} - 1 right) \
                                          &= binom{n + 1}{k + 1}
                                          end{align}$







                                          share|cite|improve this answer














                                          share|cite|improve this answer



                                          share|cite|improve this answer








                                          edited Oct 21 '15 at 16:07

























                                          answered Oct 21 '15 at 15:58









                                          vonbrand

                                          19.8k63058




                                          19.8k63058






















                                              up vote
                                              6
                                              down vote













                                              We can use the integral representation of the binomial coefficient $$dbinom{t}{k}=frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{left(1+zright)^{t}}{z^{k+1}}dztag{1}
                                              $$ and get $$sum_{t=0}^{n}dbinom{t}{k}=frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{sum_{k=0}^{n}left(1+zright)^{t}}{z^{k+1}}dz
                                              $$ $$=frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{left(z+1right)^{n+1}}{z^{k+2}}dz-frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{1}{z^{k+2}}dz
                                              $$ and so usign again $(1)$ we have $$sum_{t=0}^{n}dbinom{t}{k}=dbinom{n+1}{k+1}-0=color{red}{dbinom{n+1}{k+1}.}$$






                                              share|cite|improve this answer

















                                              • 2




                                                It is so nice and weird. +1
                                                – Behrouz Maleki
                                                Jul 5 '16 at 10:27










                                              • +1. Nice work. You must subtract $displaystyle{delta_{k,-1}}$ in order to take account of the case $displaystyle{k = -1}$. When $displaystyle{k = -1}$, the LHS is equal to $displaystyle{0}$ and your RHS is equal to $displaystyle{1}$. With the $displaystyle{delta_{k,-1}}$ you'll get $displaystyle{1 - 1 = 0}$.
                                                – Felix Marin
                                                Jul 6 '16 at 21:50

















                                              up vote
                                              6
                                              down vote













                                              We can use the integral representation of the binomial coefficient $$dbinom{t}{k}=frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{left(1+zright)^{t}}{z^{k+1}}dztag{1}
                                              $$ and get $$sum_{t=0}^{n}dbinom{t}{k}=frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{sum_{k=0}^{n}left(1+zright)^{t}}{z^{k+1}}dz
                                              $$ $$=frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{left(z+1right)^{n+1}}{z^{k+2}}dz-frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{1}{z^{k+2}}dz
                                              $$ and so usign again $(1)$ we have $$sum_{t=0}^{n}dbinom{t}{k}=dbinom{n+1}{k+1}-0=color{red}{dbinom{n+1}{k+1}.}$$






                                              share|cite|improve this answer

















                                              • 2




                                                It is so nice and weird. +1
                                                – Behrouz Maleki
                                                Jul 5 '16 at 10:27










                                              • +1. Nice work. You must subtract $displaystyle{delta_{k,-1}}$ in order to take account of the case $displaystyle{k = -1}$. When $displaystyle{k = -1}$, the LHS is equal to $displaystyle{0}$ and your RHS is equal to $displaystyle{1}$. With the $displaystyle{delta_{k,-1}}$ you'll get $displaystyle{1 - 1 = 0}$.
                                                – Felix Marin
                                                Jul 6 '16 at 21:50















                                              up vote
                                              6
                                              down vote










                                              up vote
                                              6
                                              down vote









                                              We can use the integral representation of the binomial coefficient $$dbinom{t}{k}=frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{left(1+zright)^{t}}{z^{k+1}}dztag{1}
                                              $$ and get $$sum_{t=0}^{n}dbinom{t}{k}=frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{sum_{k=0}^{n}left(1+zright)^{t}}{z^{k+1}}dz
                                              $$ $$=frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{left(z+1right)^{n+1}}{z^{k+2}}dz-frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{1}{z^{k+2}}dz
                                              $$ and so usign again $(1)$ we have $$sum_{t=0}^{n}dbinom{t}{k}=dbinom{n+1}{k+1}-0=color{red}{dbinom{n+1}{k+1}.}$$






                                              share|cite|improve this answer












                                              We can use the integral representation of the binomial coefficient $$dbinom{t}{k}=frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{left(1+zright)^{t}}{z^{k+1}}dztag{1}
                                              $$ and get $$sum_{t=0}^{n}dbinom{t}{k}=frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{sum_{k=0}^{n}left(1+zright)^{t}}{z^{k+1}}dz
                                              $$ $$=frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{left(z+1right)^{n+1}}{z^{k+2}}dz-frac{1}{2pi i}oint_{left|zright|=1}frac{1}{z^{k+2}}dz
                                              $$ and so usign again $(1)$ we have $$sum_{t=0}^{n}dbinom{t}{k}=dbinom{n+1}{k+1}-0=color{red}{dbinom{n+1}{k+1}.}$$







                                              share|cite|improve this answer












                                              share|cite|improve this answer



                                              share|cite|improve this answer










                                              answered Jul 5 '16 at 10:13









                                              Marco Cantarini

                                              28.9k23272




                                              28.9k23272








                                              • 2




                                                It is so nice and weird. +1
                                                – Behrouz Maleki
                                                Jul 5 '16 at 10:27










                                              • +1. Nice work. You must subtract $displaystyle{delta_{k,-1}}$ in order to take account of the case $displaystyle{k = -1}$. When $displaystyle{k = -1}$, the LHS is equal to $displaystyle{0}$ and your RHS is equal to $displaystyle{1}$. With the $displaystyle{delta_{k,-1}}$ you'll get $displaystyle{1 - 1 = 0}$.
                                                – Felix Marin
                                                Jul 6 '16 at 21:50
















                                              • 2




                                                It is so nice and weird. +1
                                                – Behrouz Maleki
                                                Jul 5 '16 at 10:27










                                              • +1. Nice work. You must subtract $displaystyle{delta_{k,-1}}$ in order to take account of the case $displaystyle{k = -1}$. When $displaystyle{k = -1}$, the LHS is equal to $displaystyle{0}$ and your RHS is equal to $displaystyle{1}$. With the $displaystyle{delta_{k,-1}}$ you'll get $displaystyle{1 - 1 = 0}$.
                                                – Felix Marin
                                                Jul 6 '16 at 21:50










                                              2




                                              2




                                              It is so nice and weird. +1
                                              – Behrouz Maleki
                                              Jul 5 '16 at 10:27




                                              It is so nice and weird. +1
                                              – Behrouz Maleki
                                              Jul 5 '16 at 10:27












                                              +1. Nice work. You must subtract $displaystyle{delta_{k,-1}}$ in order to take account of the case $displaystyle{k = -1}$. When $displaystyle{k = -1}$, the LHS is equal to $displaystyle{0}$ and your RHS is equal to $displaystyle{1}$. With the $displaystyle{delta_{k,-1}}$ you'll get $displaystyle{1 - 1 = 0}$.
                                              – Felix Marin
                                              Jul 6 '16 at 21:50






                                              +1. Nice work. You must subtract $displaystyle{delta_{k,-1}}$ in order to take account of the case $displaystyle{k = -1}$. When $displaystyle{k = -1}$, the LHS is equal to $displaystyle{0}$ and your RHS is equal to $displaystyle{1}$. With the $displaystyle{delta_{k,-1}}$ you'll get $displaystyle{1 - 1 = 0}$.
                                              – Felix Marin
                                              Jul 6 '16 at 21:50












                                              up vote
                                              4
                                              down vote













                                              You remember that:
                                              $$
                                              (1+x)^m = sum_k binom{m}{k} x^k
                                              $$
                                              So the sum
                                              $$
                                              sum_{m=0}^M binom{m+k}{k}
                                              $$
                                              is the coefficient of $ x^k $ in:
                                              $$
                                              sum_{m=0}^M (1+x)^{m+k}
                                              $$ Yes?
                                              So now use the geometric series formula given:
                                              $$
                                              sum_{m=0}^M (1+x)^{m+k} = -frac{(1+x)^k}{x} left( 1 - (1+x)^{M+1} right)
                                              $$
                                              And now you want to know what is coefficient of $x^k $ in there. You got it from here.






                                              share|cite|improve this answer

























                                                up vote
                                                4
                                                down vote













                                                You remember that:
                                                $$
                                                (1+x)^m = sum_k binom{m}{k} x^k
                                                $$
                                                So the sum
                                                $$
                                                sum_{m=0}^M binom{m+k}{k}
                                                $$
                                                is the coefficient of $ x^k $ in:
                                                $$
                                                sum_{m=0}^M (1+x)^{m+k}
                                                $$ Yes?
                                                So now use the geometric series formula given:
                                                $$
                                                sum_{m=0}^M (1+x)^{m+k} = -frac{(1+x)^k}{x} left( 1 - (1+x)^{M+1} right)
                                                $$
                                                And now you want to know what is coefficient of $x^k $ in there. You got it from here.






                                                share|cite|improve this answer























                                                  up vote
                                                  4
                                                  down vote










                                                  up vote
                                                  4
                                                  down vote









                                                  You remember that:
                                                  $$
                                                  (1+x)^m = sum_k binom{m}{k} x^k
                                                  $$
                                                  So the sum
                                                  $$
                                                  sum_{m=0}^M binom{m+k}{k}
                                                  $$
                                                  is the coefficient of $ x^k $ in:
                                                  $$
                                                  sum_{m=0}^M (1+x)^{m+k}
                                                  $$ Yes?
                                                  So now use the geometric series formula given:
                                                  $$
                                                  sum_{m=0}^M (1+x)^{m+k} = -frac{(1+x)^k}{x} left( 1 - (1+x)^{M+1} right)
                                                  $$
                                                  And now you want to know what is coefficient of $x^k $ in there. You got it from here.






                                                  share|cite|improve this answer












                                                  You remember that:
                                                  $$
                                                  (1+x)^m = sum_k binom{m}{k} x^k
                                                  $$
                                                  So the sum
                                                  $$
                                                  sum_{m=0}^M binom{m+k}{k}
                                                  $$
                                                  is the coefficient of $ x^k $ in:
                                                  $$
                                                  sum_{m=0}^M (1+x)^{m+k}
                                                  $$ Yes?
                                                  So now use the geometric series formula given:
                                                  $$
                                                  sum_{m=0}^M (1+x)^{m+k} = -frac{(1+x)^k}{x} left( 1 - (1+x)^{M+1} right)
                                                  $$
                                                  And now you want to know what is coefficient of $x^k $ in there. You got it from here.







                                                  share|cite|improve this answer












                                                  share|cite|improve this answer



                                                  share|cite|improve this answer










                                                  answered May 22 '13 at 2:39









                                                  user78883

                                                  411




                                                  411






















                                                      up vote
                                                      4
                                                      down vote













                                                      In this answer, I prove the identity
                                                      $$
                                                      binom{-n}{k}=(-1)^kbinom{n+k-1}{k}tag{1}
                                                      $$
                                                      Here is a generalization of the identity in question, proven using the Vandermonde Identity
                                                      $$
                                                      begin{align}
                                                      sum_{m=0}^Mbinom{m+k}{k}binom{M-m}{n}
                                                      &=sum_{m=0}^Mbinom{m+k}{m}binom{M-m}{M-m-n}tag{2}\
                                                      &=sum_{m=0}^M(-1)^mbinom{-k-1}{m}(-1)^{M-m-n}binom{-n-1}{M-m-n}tag{3}\
                                                      &=(-1)^{M-n}sum_{m=0}^Mbinom{-k-1}{m}binom{-n-1}{M-m-n}tag{4}\
                                                      &=(-1)^{M-n}binom{-k-n-2}{M-n}tag{5}\
                                                      &=binom{M+k+1}{M-n}tag{6}\
                                                      &=binom{M+k+1}{n+k+1}tag{7}
                                                      end{align}
                                                      $$
                                                      Explanation:

                                                      $(2)$: $binom{n}{k}=binom{n}{n-k}$

                                                      $(3)$: apply $(1)$ to each binomial coefficient

                                                      $(4)$: combine the powers of $-1$ which can then be pulled out front

                                                      $(5)$: apply Vandermonde

                                                      $(6)$: apply $(1)$

                                                      $(7)$: $binom{n}{k}=binom{n}{n-k}$



                                                      To get the identity in the question, set $n=0$.






                                                      share|cite|improve this answer



















                                                      • 2




                                                        @FoF: I have added a link here and answered your other question. Thanks for mentioning the difficulty.
                                                        – robjohn
                                                        Dec 7 '13 at 12:33






                                                      • 1




                                                        @FoF: That is the Vandermonde Identity that I mentioned at the beginning.
                                                        – robjohn
                                                        Dec 8 '13 at 18:56








                                                      • 1




                                                        @FoF: I added an explanation for each line.
                                                        – robjohn
                                                        Dec 9 '13 at 2:20








                                                      • 1




                                                        I answered my own question about $(5, 6$) here.
                                                        – NaN
                                                        Dec 10 '13 at 8:54






                                                      • 1




                                                        @FoF: Ah. That is why I added the Explanation when I saw difficulty in following the argument.
                                                        – robjohn
                                                        Dec 11 '13 at 7:46

















                                                      up vote
                                                      4
                                                      down vote













                                                      In this answer, I prove the identity
                                                      $$
                                                      binom{-n}{k}=(-1)^kbinom{n+k-1}{k}tag{1}
                                                      $$
                                                      Here is a generalization of the identity in question, proven using the Vandermonde Identity
                                                      $$
                                                      begin{align}
                                                      sum_{m=0}^Mbinom{m+k}{k}binom{M-m}{n}
                                                      &=sum_{m=0}^Mbinom{m+k}{m}binom{M-m}{M-m-n}tag{2}\
                                                      &=sum_{m=0}^M(-1)^mbinom{-k-1}{m}(-1)^{M-m-n}binom{-n-1}{M-m-n}tag{3}\
                                                      &=(-1)^{M-n}sum_{m=0}^Mbinom{-k-1}{m}binom{-n-1}{M-m-n}tag{4}\
                                                      &=(-1)^{M-n}binom{-k-n-2}{M-n}tag{5}\
                                                      &=binom{M+k+1}{M-n}tag{6}\
                                                      &=binom{M+k+1}{n+k+1}tag{7}
                                                      end{align}
                                                      $$
                                                      Explanation:

                                                      $(2)$: $binom{n}{k}=binom{n}{n-k}$

                                                      $(3)$: apply $(1)$ to each binomial coefficient

                                                      $(4)$: combine the powers of $-1$ which can then be pulled out front

                                                      $(5)$: apply Vandermonde

                                                      $(6)$: apply $(1)$

                                                      $(7)$: $binom{n}{k}=binom{n}{n-k}$



                                                      To get the identity in the question, set $n=0$.






                                                      share|cite|improve this answer



















                                                      • 2




                                                        @FoF: I have added a link here and answered your other question. Thanks for mentioning the difficulty.
                                                        – robjohn
                                                        Dec 7 '13 at 12:33






                                                      • 1




                                                        @FoF: That is the Vandermonde Identity that I mentioned at the beginning.
                                                        – robjohn
                                                        Dec 8 '13 at 18:56








                                                      • 1




                                                        @FoF: I added an explanation for each line.
                                                        – robjohn
                                                        Dec 9 '13 at 2:20








                                                      • 1




                                                        I answered my own question about $(5, 6$) here.
                                                        – NaN
                                                        Dec 10 '13 at 8:54






                                                      • 1




                                                        @FoF: Ah. That is why I added the Explanation when I saw difficulty in following the argument.
                                                        – robjohn
                                                        Dec 11 '13 at 7:46















                                                      up vote
                                                      4
                                                      down vote










                                                      up vote
                                                      4
                                                      down vote









                                                      In this answer, I prove the identity
                                                      $$
                                                      binom{-n}{k}=(-1)^kbinom{n+k-1}{k}tag{1}
                                                      $$
                                                      Here is a generalization of the identity in question, proven using the Vandermonde Identity
                                                      $$
                                                      begin{align}
                                                      sum_{m=0}^Mbinom{m+k}{k}binom{M-m}{n}
                                                      &=sum_{m=0}^Mbinom{m+k}{m}binom{M-m}{M-m-n}tag{2}\
                                                      &=sum_{m=0}^M(-1)^mbinom{-k-1}{m}(-1)^{M-m-n}binom{-n-1}{M-m-n}tag{3}\
                                                      &=(-1)^{M-n}sum_{m=0}^Mbinom{-k-1}{m}binom{-n-1}{M-m-n}tag{4}\
                                                      &=(-1)^{M-n}binom{-k-n-2}{M-n}tag{5}\
                                                      &=binom{M+k+1}{M-n}tag{6}\
                                                      &=binom{M+k+1}{n+k+1}tag{7}
                                                      end{align}
                                                      $$
                                                      Explanation:

                                                      $(2)$: $binom{n}{k}=binom{n}{n-k}$

                                                      $(3)$: apply $(1)$ to each binomial coefficient

                                                      $(4)$: combine the powers of $-1$ which can then be pulled out front

                                                      $(5)$: apply Vandermonde

                                                      $(6)$: apply $(1)$

                                                      $(7)$: $binom{n}{k}=binom{n}{n-k}$



                                                      To get the identity in the question, set $n=0$.






                                                      share|cite|improve this answer














                                                      In this answer, I prove the identity
                                                      $$
                                                      binom{-n}{k}=(-1)^kbinom{n+k-1}{k}tag{1}
                                                      $$
                                                      Here is a generalization of the identity in question, proven using the Vandermonde Identity
                                                      $$
                                                      begin{align}
                                                      sum_{m=0}^Mbinom{m+k}{k}binom{M-m}{n}
                                                      &=sum_{m=0}^Mbinom{m+k}{m}binom{M-m}{M-m-n}tag{2}\
                                                      &=sum_{m=0}^M(-1)^mbinom{-k-1}{m}(-1)^{M-m-n}binom{-n-1}{M-m-n}tag{3}\
                                                      &=(-1)^{M-n}sum_{m=0}^Mbinom{-k-1}{m}binom{-n-1}{M-m-n}tag{4}\
                                                      &=(-1)^{M-n}binom{-k-n-2}{M-n}tag{5}\
                                                      &=binom{M+k+1}{M-n}tag{6}\
                                                      &=binom{M+k+1}{n+k+1}tag{7}
                                                      end{align}
                                                      $$
                                                      Explanation:

                                                      $(2)$: $binom{n}{k}=binom{n}{n-k}$

                                                      $(3)$: apply $(1)$ to each binomial coefficient

                                                      $(4)$: combine the powers of $-1$ which can then be pulled out front

                                                      $(5)$: apply Vandermonde

                                                      $(6)$: apply $(1)$

                                                      $(7)$: $binom{n}{k}=binom{n}{n-k}$



                                                      To get the identity in the question, set $n=0$.







                                                      share|cite|improve this answer














                                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                                      share|cite|improve this answer








                                                      edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:19









                                                      Community

                                                      1




                                                      1










                                                      answered May 22 '13 at 13:13









                                                      robjohn

                                                      262k27300620




                                                      262k27300620








                                                      • 2




                                                        @FoF: I have added a link here and answered your other question. Thanks for mentioning the difficulty.
                                                        – robjohn
                                                        Dec 7 '13 at 12:33






                                                      • 1




                                                        @FoF: That is the Vandermonde Identity that I mentioned at the beginning.
                                                        – robjohn
                                                        Dec 8 '13 at 18:56








                                                      • 1




                                                        @FoF: I added an explanation for each line.
                                                        – robjohn
                                                        Dec 9 '13 at 2:20








                                                      • 1




                                                        I answered my own question about $(5, 6$) here.
                                                        – NaN
                                                        Dec 10 '13 at 8:54






                                                      • 1




                                                        @FoF: Ah. That is why I added the Explanation when I saw difficulty in following the argument.
                                                        – robjohn
                                                        Dec 11 '13 at 7:46
















                                                      • 2




                                                        @FoF: I have added a link here and answered your other question. Thanks for mentioning the difficulty.
                                                        – robjohn
                                                        Dec 7 '13 at 12:33






                                                      • 1




                                                        @FoF: That is the Vandermonde Identity that I mentioned at the beginning.
                                                        – robjohn
                                                        Dec 8 '13 at 18:56








                                                      • 1




                                                        @FoF: I added an explanation for each line.
                                                        – robjohn
                                                        Dec 9 '13 at 2:20








                                                      • 1




                                                        I answered my own question about $(5, 6$) here.
                                                        – NaN
                                                        Dec 10 '13 at 8:54






                                                      • 1




                                                        @FoF: Ah. That is why I added the Explanation when I saw difficulty in following the argument.
                                                        – robjohn
                                                        Dec 11 '13 at 7:46










                                                      2




                                                      2




                                                      @FoF: I have added a link here and answered your other question. Thanks for mentioning the difficulty.
                                                      – robjohn
                                                      Dec 7 '13 at 12:33




                                                      @FoF: I have added a link here and answered your other question. Thanks for mentioning the difficulty.
                                                      – robjohn
                                                      Dec 7 '13 at 12:33




                                                      1




                                                      1




                                                      @FoF: That is the Vandermonde Identity that I mentioned at the beginning.
                                                      – robjohn
                                                      Dec 8 '13 at 18:56






                                                      @FoF: That is the Vandermonde Identity that I mentioned at the beginning.
                                                      – robjohn
                                                      Dec 8 '13 at 18:56






                                                      1




                                                      1




                                                      @FoF: I added an explanation for each line.
                                                      – robjohn
                                                      Dec 9 '13 at 2:20






                                                      @FoF: I added an explanation for each line.
                                                      – robjohn
                                                      Dec 9 '13 at 2:20






                                                      1




                                                      1




                                                      I answered my own question about $(5, 6$) here.
                                                      – NaN
                                                      Dec 10 '13 at 8:54




                                                      I answered my own question about $(5, 6$) here.
                                                      – NaN
                                                      Dec 10 '13 at 8:54




                                                      1




                                                      1




                                                      @FoF: Ah. That is why I added the Explanation when I saw difficulty in following the argument.
                                                      – robjohn
                                                      Dec 11 '13 at 7:46






                                                      @FoF: Ah. That is why I added the Explanation when I saw difficulty in following the argument.
                                                      – robjohn
                                                      Dec 11 '13 at 7:46












                                                      up vote
                                                      1
                                                      down vote













                                                      Recall that for $kinBbb N$ we have the generating function



                                                      $$sum_{nge 0}binom{n+k}kx^n=frac1{(1-x)^{k+1}};.$$



                                                      The identity in the question can therefore be rewritten as



                                                      $$left(sum_{nge 0}binom{n+k}kx^nright)left(sum_{nge 0}x^nright)=sum_{nge 0}binom{n+k+1}{k+1}x^n;.$$



                                                      The coefficient of $x^n$ in the product on the left is



                                                      $$sum_{i=0}^nbinom{i+k}kcdot1=sum_{i=0}^nbinom{i+k}k;,$$



                                                      and the $n$-th term of the discrete convolution of the sequences $leftlanglebinom{n+k}k:ninBbb Nrightrangle$ and $langle 1,1,1,dotsrangle$. And at this point you’re practically done.






                                                      share|cite|improve this answer





















                                                      • Is there a typo in the second equation (first sum)? I believe $k$ should be indexed.
                                                        – AlanH
                                                        May 27 '13 at 6:20












                                                      • @Alan: No, the sum is over $n$; $k$ is fixed throughout.
                                                        – Brian M. Scott
                                                        May 27 '13 at 7:19










                                                      • In my text, I have an identity $sum_{rgeq 0} binom{r + n}{r} x^r = 1/(1-x)^{n+1}$ This may be the cause of my confusion, but is this identity correct and is it equivalent to the one you used?
                                                        – AlanH
                                                        May 27 '13 at 8:22










                                                      • @Alan: Sure: your $r$ is my $n$, and your $n$ is my $k$.
                                                        – Brian M. Scott
                                                        May 27 '13 at 8:28






                                                      • 1




                                                        @Alan: $binom{r+n}r=binom{r+n}n$; now do the translation. (Sorry: I didn’t notice before that you’d used the symmetrically opposite binomial coefficient.)
                                                        – Brian M. Scott
                                                        May 27 '13 at 19:19















                                                      up vote
                                                      1
                                                      down vote













                                                      Recall that for $kinBbb N$ we have the generating function



                                                      $$sum_{nge 0}binom{n+k}kx^n=frac1{(1-x)^{k+1}};.$$



                                                      The identity in the question can therefore be rewritten as



                                                      $$left(sum_{nge 0}binom{n+k}kx^nright)left(sum_{nge 0}x^nright)=sum_{nge 0}binom{n+k+1}{k+1}x^n;.$$



                                                      The coefficient of $x^n$ in the product on the left is



                                                      $$sum_{i=0}^nbinom{i+k}kcdot1=sum_{i=0}^nbinom{i+k}k;,$$



                                                      and the $n$-th term of the discrete convolution of the sequences $leftlanglebinom{n+k}k:ninBbb Nrightrangle$ and $langle 1,1,1,dotsrangle$. And at this point you’re practically done.






                                                      share|cite|improve this answer





















                                                      • Is there a typo in the second equation (first sum)? I believe $k$ should be indexed.
                                                        – AlanH
                                                        May 27 '13 at 6:20












                                                      • @Alan: No, the sum is over $n$; $k$ is fixed throughout.
                                                        – Brian M. Scott
                                                        May 27 '13 at 7:19










                                                      • In my text, I have an identity $sum_{rgeq 0} binom{r + n}{r} x^r = 1/(1-x)^{n+1}$ This may be the cause of my confusion, but is this identity correct and is it equivalent to the one you used?
                                                        – AlanH
                                                        May 27 '13 at 8:22










                                                      • @Alan: Sure: your $r$ is my $n$, and your $n$ is my $k$.
                                                        – Brian M. Scott
                                                        May 27 '13 at 8:28






                                                      • 1




                                                        @Alan: $binom{r+n}r=binom{r+n}n$; now do the translation. (Sorry: I didn’t notice before that you’d used the symmetrically opposite binomial coefficient.)
                                                        – Brian M. Scott
                                                        May 27 '13 at 19:19













                                                      up vote
                                                      1
                                                      down vote










                                                      up vote
                                                      1
                                                      down vote









                                                      Recall that for $kinBbb N$ we have the generating function



                                                      $$sum_{nge 0}binom{n+k}kx^n=frac1{(1-x)^{k+1}};.$$



                                                      The identity in the question can therefore be rewritten as



                                                      $$left(sum_{nge 0}binom{n+k}kx^nright)left(sum_{nge 0}x^nright)=sum_{nge 0}binom{n+k+1}{k+1}x^n;.$$



                                                      The coefficient of $x^n$ in the product on the left is



                                                      $$sum_{i=0}^nbinom{i+k}kcdot1=sum_{i=0}^nbinom{i+k}k;,$$



                                                      and the $n$-th term of the discrete convolution of the sequences $leftlanglebinom{n+k}k:ninBbb Nrightrangle$ and $langle 1,1,1,dotsrangle$. And at this point you’re practically done.






                                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                                      Recall that for $kinBbb N$ we have the generating function



                                                      $$sum_{nge 0}binom{n+k}kx^n=frac1{(1-x)^{k+1}};.$$



                                                      The identity in the question can therefore be rewritten as



                                                      $$left(sum_{nge 0}binom{n+k}kx^nright)left(sum_{nge 0}x^nright)=sum_{nge 0}binom{n+k+1}{k+1}x^n;.$$



                                                      The coefficient of $x^n$ in the product on the left is



                                                      $$sum_{i=0}^nbinom{i+k}kcdot1=sum_{i=0}^nbinom{i+k}k;,$$



                                                      and the $n$-th term of the discrete convolution of the sequences $leftlanglebinom{n+k}k:ninBbb Nrightrangle$ and $langle 1,1,1,dotsrangle$. And at this point you’re practically done.







                                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                                      share|cite|improve this answer










                                                      answered May 22 '13 at 5:32









                                                      Brian M. Scott

                                                      453k38503902




                                                      453k38503902












                                                      • Is there a typo in the second equation (first sum)? I believe $k$ should be indexed.
                                                        – AlanH
                                                        May 27 '13 at 6:20












                                                      • @Alan: No, the sum is over $n$; $k$ is fixed throughout.
                                                        – Brian M. Scott
                                                        May 27 '13 at 7:19










                                                      • In my text, I have an identity $sum_{rgeq 0} binom{r + n}{r} x^r = 1/(1-x)^{n+1}$ This may be the cause of my confusion, but is this identity correct and is it equivalent to the one you used?
                                                        – AlanH
                                                        May 27 '13 at 8:22










                                                      • @Alan: Sure: your $r$ is my $n$, and your $n$ is my $k$.
                                                        – Brian M. Scott
                                                        May 27 '13 at 8:28






                                                      • 1




                                                        @Alan: $binom{r+n}r=binom{r+n}n$; now do the translation. (Sorry: I didn’t notice before that you’d used the symmetrically opposite binomial coefficient.)
                                                        – Brian M. Scott
                                                        May 27 '13 at 19:19


















                                                      • Is there a typo in the second equation (first sum)? I believe $k$ should be indexed.
                                                        – AlanH
                                                        May 27 '13 at 6:20












                                                      • @Alan: No, the sum is over $n$; $k$ is fixed throughout.
                                                        – Brian M. Scott
                                                        May 27 '13 at 7:19










                                                      • In my text, I have an identity $sum_{rgeq 0} binom{r + n}{r} x^r = 1/(1-x)^{n+1}$ This may be the cause of my confusion, but is this identity correct and is it equivalent to the one you used?
                                                        – AlanH
                                                        May 27 '13 at 8:22










                                                      • @Alan: Sure: your $r$ is my $n$, and your $n$ is my $k$.
                                                        – Brian M. Scott
                                                        May 27 '13 at 8:28






                                                      • 1




                                                        @Alan: $binom{r+n}r=binom{r+n}n$; now do the translation. (Sorry: I didn’t notice before that you’d used the symmetrically opposite binomial coefficient.)
                                                        – Brian M. Scott
                                                        May 27 '13 at 19:19
















                                                      Is there a typo in the second equation (first sum)? I believe $k$ should be indexed.
                                                      – AlanH
                                                      May 27 '13 at 6:20






                                                      Is there a typo in the second equation (first sum)? I believe $k$ should be indexed.
                                                      – AlanH
                                                      May 27 '13 at 6:20














                                                      @Alan: No, the sum is over $n$; $k$ is fixed throughout.
                                                      – Brian M. Scott
                                                      May 27 '13 at 7:19




                                                      @Alan: No, the sum is over $n$; $k$ is fixed throughout.
                                                      – Brian M. Scott
                                                      May 27 '13 at 7:19












                                                      In my text, I have an identity $sum_{rgeq 0} binom{r + n}{r} x^r = 1/(1-x)^{n+1}$ This may be the cause of my confusion, but is this identity correct and is it equivalent to the one you used?
                                                      – AlanH
                                                      May 27 '13 at 8:22




                                                      In my text, I have an identity $sum_{rgeq 0} binom{r + n}{r} x^r = 1/(1-x)^{n+1}$ This may be the cause of my confusion, but is this identity correct and is it equivalent to the one you used?
                                                      – AlanH
                                                      May 27 '13 at 8:22












                                                      @Alan: Sure: your $r$ is my $n$, and your $n$ is my $k$.
                                                      – Brian M. Scott
                                                      May 27 '13 at 8:28




                                                      @Alan: Sure: your $r$ is my $n$, and your $n$ is my $k$.
                                                      – Brian M. Scott
                                                      May 27 '13 at 8:28




                                                      1




                                                      1




                                                      @Alan: $binom{r+n}r=binom{r+n}n$; now do the translation. (Sorry: I didn’t notice before that you’d used the symmetrically opposite binomial coefficient.)
                                                      – Brian M. Scott
                                                      May 27 '13 at 19:19




                                                      @Alan: $binom{r+n}r=binom{r+n}n$; now do the translation. (Sorry: I didn’t notice before that you’d used the symmetrically opposite binomial coefficient.)
                                                      – Brian M. Scott
                                                      May 27 '13 at 19:19










                                                      up vote
                                                      1
                                                      down vote













                                                      A standard technique to prove such identities $sum_{i=0}^Mf(i)=F(M)$, involving on one hand a sum where only the upper bound $M$ is variable and on the other hand an explicit expression in terms of$~M$, is to use induction on$~M$. It amounts to showing that $f(M)=F(M)-F(M-1)$ (and that $F(0)=f(0)$). This is similar to using the fundamental theorem of calculus in showing that $int_0^{x_0}f(x)mathrm dx=F(x_0)$ by establishing $f(x)=F'(x)$ (and $F(0)=0$).



                                                      So here you need to check (apart from the obvious starting case $M=0$) that $binom{M+k}k=binom{M+k+1}{k+1}-binom{M+k}{k+1}$. This is just in instance of Pascal's recurrence for binomial coefficients.






                                                      share|cite|improve this answer



























                                                        up vote
                                                        1
                                                        down vote













                                                        A standard technique to prove such identities $sum_{i=0}^Mf(i)=F(M)$, involving on one hand a sum where only the upper bound $M$ is variable and on the other hand an explicit expression in terms of$~M$, is to use induction on$~M$. It amounts to showing that $f(M)=F(M)-F(M-1)$ (and that $F(0)=f(0)$). This is similar to using the fundamental theorem of calculus in showing that $int_0^{x_0}f(x)mathrm dx=F(x_0)$ by establishing $f(x)=F'(x)$ (and $F(0)=0$).



                                                        So here you need to check (apart from the obvious starting case $M=0$) that $binom{M+k}k=binom{M+k+1}{k+1}-binom{M+k}{k+1}$. This is just in instance of Pascal's recurrence for binomial coefficients.






                                                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                                                          up vote
                                                          1
                                                          down vote










                                                          up vote
                                                          1
                                                          down vote









                                                          A standard technique to prove such identities $sum_{i=0}^Mf(i)=F(M)$, involving on one hand a sum where only the upper bound $M$ is variable and on the other hand an explicit expression in terms of$~M$, is to use induction on$~M$. It amounts to showing that $f(M)=F(M)-F(M-1)$ (and that $F(0)=f(0)$). This is similar to using the fundamental theorem of calculus in showing that $int_0^{x_0}f(x)mathrm dx=F(x_0)$ by establishing $f(x)=F'(x)$ (and $F(0)=0$).



                                                          So here you need to check (apart from the obvious starting case $M=0$) that $binom{M+k}k=binom{M+k+1}{k+1}-binom{M+k}{k+1}$. This is just in instance of Pascal's recurrence for binomial coefficients.






                                                          share|cite|improve this answer














                                                          A standard technique to prove such identities $sum_{i=0}^Mf(i)=F(M)$, involving on one hand a sum where only the upper bound $M$ is variable and on the other hand an explicit expression in terms of$~M$, is to use induction on$~M$. It amounts to showing that $f(M)=F(M)-F(M-1)$ (and that $F(0)=f(0)$). This is similar to using the fundamental theorem of calculus in showing that $int_0^{x_0}f(x)mathrm dx=F(x_0)$ by establishing $f(x)=F'(x)$ (and $F(0)=0$).



                                                          So here you need to check (apart from the obvious starting case $M=0$) that $binom{M+k}k=binom{M+k+1}{k+1}-binom{M+k}{k+1}$. This is just in instance of Pascal's recurrence for binomial coefficients.







                                                          share|cite|improve this answer














                                                          share|cite|improve this answer



                                                          share|cite|improve this answer








                                                          edited Dec 23 '13 at 14:25

























                                                          answered Dec 23 '13 at 11:46









                                                          Marc van Leeuwen

                                                          86k5105216




                                                          86k5105216






















                                                              up vote
                                                              1
                                                              down vote













                                                              $newcommand{angles}[1]{leftlangle,{#1},rightrangle}
                                                              newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
                                                              newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
                                                              newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
                                                              newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
                                                              newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
                                                              newcommand{half}{{1 over 2}}
                                                              newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
                                                              newcommand{iff}{Leftrightarrow}
                                                              newcommand{imp}{Longrightarrow}
                                                              newcommand{ol}[1]{overline{#1}}
                                                              newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
                                                              newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
                                                              newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
                                                              newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
                                                              newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
                                                              Assuming $ds{M geq 0}$:




                                                              begin{equation}
                                                              mbox{Note that}quad
                                                              sum_{m = 0}^{M}{m + k choose k} = sum_{m = k}^{M + k}{m choose k} =
                                                              a_{M + k} - a_{k - 1}quadmbox{where}quad a_{n} equiv
                                                              sum_{m = 0}^{n}{m choose k}tag{1}
                                                              end{equation}







                                                              Then,
                                                              begin{align}
                                                              color{#f00}{a_{n}} & equiv sum_{m = 0}^{n}{m choose k} =
                                                              sum_{m = 0}^{n} overbrace{%
                                                              oint_{verts{z} = 1}{pars{1 + z}^{m} over z^{k + 1}},{dd z over 2piic}}
                                                              ^{ds{m choose k}} =
                                                              oint_{verts{z} = 1}{1 over z^{k + 1}}sum_{m = 0}^{n}pars{1 + z}^{m}
                                                              ,{dd z over 2piic}
                                                              \[3mm] & =
                                                              oint_{verts{z} = 1}{1 over z^{k + 1}},
                                                              {pars{1 + z}^{n + 1} - 1 over pars{1 + z} - 1},{dd z over 2piic} =
                                                              underbrace{oint_{verts{z} = 1}{pars{1 + z}^{n + 1} over z^{k + 2}}
                                                              ,{dd z over 2piic}}_{ds{n + 1 choose k + 1}} -
                                                              underbrace{oint_{verts{z} = 1}{1 over z^{k + 2}},{dd z over 2piic}}
                                                              _{ds{delta_{k + 2,1}}}
                                                              \[8mm] imp color{#f00}{a_{n}} & = fbox{$ds{quad%
                                                              {n + 1 choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}quad}$}
                                                              end{align}


                                                              begin{align}
                                                              mbox{With} pars{1},,quad
                                                              color{#f00}{sum_{m = 0}^{M}{m + k choose k}} & =
                                                              bracks{{M + k + 1 choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}} -
                                                              bracks{{k choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}}
                                                              \[3mm] & =
                                                              {M + k + 1 choose k + 1} - {k choose k + 1}
                                                              end{align}
                                                              Thanks to $ds{@robjohn}$ user who pointed out the following feature:
                                                              $$
                                                              {k choose k + 1} = {-k + k + 1 - 1 choose k + 1}pars{-1}^{k + 1} =
                                                              -pars{-1}^{k}{0 choose k + 1} = delta_{k,-1}
                                                              $$
                                                              such that
                                                              $$
                                                              begin{array}{|c|}hlinembox{}\
                                                              ds{quadcolor{#f00}{sum_{m = 0}^{M}{m + k choose k}} =
                                                              color{#f00}{{M + k + 1 choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}}quad}
                                                              \ mbox{}\ hline
                                                              end{array}
                                                              $$




                                                              share|cite|improve this answer























                                                              • Since $k=-1$ is covered in the first part, it should be noted that since $binom{-1}{0}=1$, $$binom{k}{k+1}-delta_{k,-1}=0$$ therefore the final answer seems it should be $$binom{M+k+1}{k+1}-delta_{k,-1}$$
                                                                – robjohn
                                                                Jul 25 '16 at 13:00










                                                              • @robjohn Thanks. I'm checking everything right now.
                                                                – Felix Marin
                                                                Jul 25 '16 at 21:48










                                                              • @robjohn Thanks. Fixed.
                                                                – Felix Marin
                                                                Jul 25 '16 at 22:09















                                                              up vote
                                                              1
                                                              down vote













                                                              $newcommand{angles}[1]{leftlangle,{#1},rightrangle}
                                                              newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
                                                              newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
                                                              newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
                                                              newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
                                                              newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
                                                              newcommand{half}{{1 over 2}}
                                                              newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
                                                              newcommand{iff}{Leftrightarrow}
                                                              newcommand{imp}{Longrightarrow}
                                                              newcommand{ol}[1]{overline{#1}}
                                                              newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
                                                              newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
                                                              newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
                                                              newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
                                                              newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
                                                              Assuming $ds{M geq 0}$:




                                                              begin{equation}
                                                              mbox{Note that}quad
                                                              sum_{m = 0}^{M}{m + k choose k} = sum_{m = k}^{M + k}{m choose k} =
                                                              a_{M + k} - a_{k - 1}quadmbox{where}quad a_{n} equiv
                                                              sum_{m = 0}^{n}{m choose k}tag{1}
                                                              end{equation}







                                                              Then,
                                                              begin{align}
                                                              color{#f00}{a_{n}} & equiv sum_{m = 0}^{n}{m choose k} =
                                                              sum_{m = 0}^{n} overbrace{%
                                                              oint_{verts{z} = 1}{pars{1 + z}^{m} over z^{k + 1}},{dd z over 2piic}}
                                                              ^{ds{m choose k}} =
                                                              oint_{verts{z} = 1}{1 over z^{k + 1}}sum_{m = 0}^{n}pars{1 + z}^{m}
                                                              ,{dd z over 2piic}
                                                              \[3mm] & =
                                                              oint_{verts{z} = 1}{1 over z^{k + 1}},
                                                              {pars{1 + z}^{n + 1} - 1 over pars{1 + z} - 1},{dd z over 2piic} =
                                                              underbrace{oint_{verts{z} = 1}{pars{1 + z}^{n + 1} over z^{k + 2}}
                                                              ,{dd z over 2piic}}_{ds{n + 1 choose k + 1}} -
                                                              underbrace{oint_{verts{z} = 1}{1 over z^{k + 2}},{dd z over 2piic}}
                                                              _{ds{delta_{k + 2,1}}}
                                                              \[8mm] imp color{#f00}{a_{n}} & = fbox{$ds{quad%
                                                              {n + 1 choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}quad}$}
                                                              end{align}


                                                              begin{align}
                                                              mbox{With} pars{1},,quad
                                                              color{#f00}{sum_{m = 0}^{M}{m + k choose k}} & =
                                                              bracks{{M + k + 1 choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}} -
                                                              bracks{{k choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}}
                                                              \[3mm] & =
                                                              {M + k + 1 choose k + 1} - {k choose k + 1}
                                                              end{align}
                                                              Thanks to $ds{@robjohn}$ user who pointed out the following feature:
                                                              $$
                                                              {k choose k + 1} = {-k + k + 1 - 1 choose k + 1}pars{-1}^{k + 1} =
                                                              -pars{-1}^{k}{0 choose k + 1} = delta_{k,-1}
                                                              $$
                                                              such that
                                                              $$
                                                              begin{array}{|c|}hlinembox{}\
                                                              ds{quadcolor{#f00}{sum_{m = 0}^{M}{m + k choose k}} =
                                                              color{#f00}{{M + k + 1 choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}}quad}
                                                              \ mbox{}\ hline
                                                              end{array}
                                                              $$




                                                              share|cite|improve this answer























                                                              • Since $k=-1$ is covered in the first part, it should be noted that since $binom{-1}{0}=1$, $$binom{k}{k+1}-delta_{k,-1}=0$$ therefore the final answer seems it should be $$binom{M+k+1}{k+1}-delta_{k,-1}$$
                                                                – robjohn
                                                                Jul 25 '16 at 13:00










                                                              • @robjohn Thanks. I'm checking everything right now.
                                                                – Felix Marin
                                                                Jul 25 '16 at 21:48










                                                              • @robjohn Thanks. Fixed.
                                                                – Felix Marin
                                                                Jul 25 '16 at 22:09













                                                              up vote
                                                              1
                                                              down vote










                                                              up vote
                                                              1
                                                              down vote









                                                              $newcommand{angles}[1]{leftlangle,{#1},rightrangle}
                                                              newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
                                                              newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
                                                              newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
                                                              newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
                                                              newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
                                                              newcommand{half}{{1 over 2}}
                                                              newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
                                                              newcommand{iff}{Leftrightarrow}
                                                              newcommand{imp}{Longrightarrow}
                                                              newcommand{ol}[1]{overline{#1}}
                                                              newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
                                                              newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
                                                              newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
                                                              newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
                                                              newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
                                                              Assuming $ds{M geq 0}$:




                                                              begin{equation}
                                                              mbox{Note that}quad
                                                              sum_{m = 0}^{M}{m + k choose k} = sum_{m = k}^{M + k}{m choose k} =
                                                              a_{M + k} - a_{k - 1}quadmbox{where}quad a_{n} equiv
                                                              sum_{m = 0}^{n}{m choose k}tag{1}
                                                              end{equation}







                                                              Then,
                                                              begin{align}
                                                              color{#f00}{a_{n}} & equiv sum_{m = 0}^{n}{m choose k} =
                                                              sum_{m = 0}^{n} overbrace{%
                                                              oint_{verts{z} = 1}{pars{1 + z}^{m} over z^{k + 1}},{dd z over 2piic}}
                                                              ^{ds{m choose k}} =
                                                              oint_{verts{z} = 1}{1 over z^{k + 1}}sum_{m = 0}^{n}pars{1 + z}^{m}
                                                              ,{dd z over 2piic}
                                                              \[3mm] & =
                                                              oint_{verts{z} = 1}{1 over z^{k + 1}},
                                                              {pars{1 + z}^{n + 1} - 1 over pars{1 + z} - 1},{dd z over 2piic} =
                                                              underbrace{oint_{verts{z} = 1}{pars{1 + z}^{n + 1} over z^{k + 2}}
                                                              ,{dd z over 2piic}}_{ds{n + 1 choose k + 1}} -
                                                              underbrace{oint_{verts{z} = 1}{1 over z^{k + 2}},{dd z over 2piic}}
                                                              _{ds{delta_{k + 2,1}}}
                                                              \[8mm] imp color{#f00}{a_{n}} & = fbox{$ds{quad%
                                                              {n + 1 choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}quad}$}
                                                              end{align}


                                                              begin{align}
                                                              mbox{With} pars{1},,quad
                                                              color{#f00}{sum_{m = 0}^{M}{m + k choose k}} & =
                                                              bracks{{M + k + 1 choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}} -
                                                              bracks{{k choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}}
                                                              \[3mm] & =
                                                              {M + k + 1 choose k + 1} - {k choose k + 1}
                                                              end{align}
                                                              Thanks to $ds{@robjohn}$ user who pointed out the following feature:
                                                              $$
                                                              {k choose k + 1} = {-k + k + 1 - 1 choose k + 1}pars{-1}^{k + 1} =
                                                              -pars{-1}^{k}{0 choose k + 1} = delta_{k,-1}
                                                              $$
                                                              such that
                                                              $$
                                                              begin{array}{|c|}hlinembox{}\
                                                              ds{quadcolor{#f00}{sum_{m = 0}^{M}{m + k choose k}} =
                                                              color{#f00}{{M + k + 1 choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}}quad}
                                                              \ mbox{}\ hline
                                                              end{array}
                                                              $$




                                                              share|cite|improve this answer














                                                              $newcommand{angles}[1]{leftlangle,{#1},rightrangle}
                                                              newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace,{#1},rightrbrace}
                                                              newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack,{#1},rightrbrack}
                                                              newcommand{dd}{mathrm{d}}
                                                              newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
                                                              newcommand{expo}[1]{,mathrm{e}^{#1},}
                                                              newcommand{half}{{1 over 2}}
                                                              newcommand{ic}{mathrm{i}}
                                                              newcommand{iff}{Leftrightarrow}
                                                              newcommand{imp}{Longrightarrow}
                                                              newcommand{ol}[1]{overline{#1}}
                                                              newcommand{pars}[1]{left(,{#1},right)}
                                                              newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
                                                              newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{,{#2},},}
                                                              newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
                                                              newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert,{#1},rightvert}$
                                                              Assuming $ds{M geq 0}$:




                                                              begin{equation}
                                                              mbox{Note that}quad
                                                              sum_{m = 0}^{M}{m + k choose k} = sum_{m = k}^{M + k}{m choose k} =
                                                              a_{M + k} - a_{k - 1}quadmbox{where}quad a_{n} equiv
                                                              sum_{m = 0}^{n}{m choose k}tag{1}
                                                              end{equation}







                                                              Then,
                                                              begin{align}
                                                              color{#f00}{a_{n}} & equiv sum_{m = 0}^{n}{m choose k} =
                                                              sum_{m = 0}^{n} overbrace{%
                                                              oint_{verts{z} = 1}{pars{1 + z}^{m} over z^{k + 1}},{dd z over 2piic}}
                                                              ^{ds{m choose k}} =
                                                              oint_{verts{z} = 1}{1 over z^{k + 1}}sum_{m = 0}^{n}pars{1 + z}^{m}
                                                              ,{dd z over 2piic}
                                                              \[3mm] & =
                                                              oint_{verts{z} = 1}{1 over z^{k + 1}},
                                                              {pars{1 + z}^{n + 1} - 1 over pars{1 + z} - 1},{dd z over 2piic} =
                                                              underbrace{oint_{verts{z} = 1}{pars{1 + z}^{n + 1} over z^{k + 2}}
                                                              ,{dd z over 2piic}}_{ds{n + 1 choose k + 1}} -
                                                              underbrace{oint_{verts{z} = 1}{1 over z^{k + 2}},{dd z over 2piic}}
                                                              _{ds{delta_{k + 2,1}}}
                                                              \[8mm] imp color{#f00}{a_{n}} & = fbox{$ds{quad%
                                                              {n + 1 choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}quad}$}
                                                              end{align}


                                                              begin{align}
                                                              mbox{With} pars{1},,quad
                                                              color{#f00}{sum_{m = 0}^{M}{m + k choose k}} & =
                                                              bracks{{M + k + 1 choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}} -
                                                              bracks{{k choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}}
                                                              \[3mm] & =
                                                              {M + k + 1 choose k + 1} - {k choose k + 1}
                                                              end{align}
                                                              Thanks to $ds{@robjohn}$ user who pointed out the following feature:
                                                              $$
                                                              {k choose k + 1} = {-k + k + 1 - 1 choose k + 1}pars{-1}^{k + 1} =
                                                              -pars{-1}^{k}{0 choose k + 1} = delta_{k,-1}
                                                              $$
                                                              such that
                                                              $$
                                                              begin{array}{|c|}hlinembox{}\
                                                              ds{quadcolor{#f00}{sum_{m = 0}^{M}{m + k choose k}} =
                                                              color{#f00}{{M + k + 1 choose k + 1} - delta_{k,-1}}quad}
                                                              \ mbox{}\ hline
                                                              end{array}
                                                              $$





                                                              share|cite|improve this answer














                                                              share|cite|improve this answer



                                                              share|cite|improve this answer








                                                              edited Jul 25 '16 at 22:09

























                                                              answered Jun 25 '16 at 4:10









                                                              Felix Marin

                                                              65.9k7107138




                                                              65.9k7107138












                                                              • Since $k=-1$ is covered in the first part, it should be noted that since $binom{-1}{0}=1$, $$binom{k}{k+1}-delta_{k,-1}=0$$ therefore the final answer seems it should be $$binom{M+k+1}{k+1}-delta_{k,-1}$$
                                                                – robjohn
                                                                Jul 25 '16 at 13:00










                                                              • @robjohn Thanks. I'm checking everything right now.
                                                                – Felix Marin
                                                                Jul 25 '16 at 21:48










                                                              • @robjohn Thanks. Fixed.
                                                                – Felix Marin
                                                                Jul 25 '16 at 22:09


















                                                              • Since $k=-1$ is covered in the first part, it should be noted that since $binom{-1}{0}=1$, $$binom{k}{k+1}-delta_{k,-1}=0$$ therefore the final answer seems it should be $$binom{M+k+1}{k+1}-delta_{k,-1}$$
                                                                – robjohn
                                                                Jul 25 '16 at 13:00










                                                              • @robjohn Thanks. I'm checking everything right now.
                                                                – Felix Marin
                                                                Jul 25 '16 at 21:48










                                                              • @robjohn Thanks. Fixed.
                                                                – Felix Marin
                                                                Jul 25 '16 at 22:09
















                                                              Since $k=-1$ is covered in the first part, it should be noted that since $binom{-1}{0}=1$, $$binom{k}{k+1}-delta_{k,-1}=0$$ therefore the final answer seems it should be $$binom{M+k+1}{k+1}-delta_{k,-1}$$
                                                              – robjohn
                                                              Jul 25 '16 at 13:00




                                                              Since $k=-1$ is covered in the first part, it should be noted that since $binom{-1}{0}=1$, $$binom{k}{k+1}-delta_{k,-1}=0$$ therefore the final answer seems it should be $$binom{M+k+1}{k+1}-delta_{k,-1}$$
                                                              – robjohn
                                                              Jul 25 '16 at 13:00












                                                              @robjohn Thanks. I'm checking everything right now.
                                                              – Felix Marin
                                                              Jul 25 '16 at 21:48




                                                              @robjohn Thanks. I'm checking everything right now.
                                                              – Felix Marin
                                                              Jul 25 '16 at 21:48












                                                              @robjohn Thanks. Fixed.
                                                              – Felix Marin
                                                              Jul 25 '16 at 22:09




                                                              @robjohn Thanks. Fixed.
                                                              – Felix Marin
                                                              Jul 25 '16 at 22:09


















                                                               

                                                              draft saved


                                                              draft discarded



















































                                                               


                                                              draft saved


                                                              draft discarded














                                                              StackExchange.ready(
                                                              function () {
                                                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1490794%2fproof-of-the-hockey-stick-identity-sum-limits-t-0n-binom-tk-binomn1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                              }
                                                              );

                                                              Post as a guest















                                                              Required, but never shown





















































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown

































                                                              Required, but never shown














                                                              Required, but never shown












                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Required, but never shown







                                                              Popular posts from this blog

                                                              Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                                                              ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                                                              Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?