Markov inequality for random variables with negative values.











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I'm given the maximum value of a random variable $X$ (for example $50$) and its mean, $mathbb E(X)=20$. How do I find the upper bound to $P(Xle -10)$?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    I think that you need to make the transformation $Y = X + 11$ and work from there.
    – Ekesh
    Nov 14 at 8:37















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I'm given the maximum value of a random variable $X$ (for example $50$) and its mean, $mathbb E(X)=20$. How do I find the upper bound to $P(Xle -10)$?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    I think that you need to make the transformation $Y = X + 11$ and work from there.
    – Ekesh
    Nov 14 at 8:37













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I'm given the maximum value of a random variable $X$ (for example $50$) and its mean, $mathbb E(X)=20$. How do I find the upper bound to $P(Xle -10)$?










share|cite|improve this question















I'm given the maximum value of a random variable $X$ (for example $50$) and its mean, $mathbb E(X)=20$. How do I find the upper bound to $P(Xle -10)$?







random-variables






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 14 at 8:32









Jimmy R.

32.9k42157




32.9k42157










asked Nov 14 at 6:21









puffles

669




669








  • 1




    I think that you need to make the transformation $Y = X + 11$ and work from there.
    – Ekesh
    Nov 14 at 8:37














  • 1




    I think that you need to make the transformation $Y = X + 11$ and work from there.
    – Ekesh
    Nov 14 at 8:37








1




1




I think that you need to make the transformation $Y = X + 11$ and work from there.
– Ekesh
Nov 14 at 8:37




I think that you need to make the transformation $Y = X + 11$ and work from there.
– Ekesh
Nov 14 at 8:37










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










Define new RV: S = 50 - R



E(S) = 30



P(R<=-10) = P(S>=60)



P(S>=60) = 30/60
= 1/2



You commented: I needed to clarify one last thing. P(50-X >= 60) <= 1/3



It should be 1/2 not 1/3.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • How is the expectation 30. Can you please explain?
    – puffles
    Nov 17 at 20:53










  • S = 50 -R so E(S) = 50 -E(R) . Since E(R) = 20. We get E(S) = 30
    – helloworld
    Nov 17 at 21:24




















up vote
1
down vote













Hint:




  • $50-X$ is a nonnegative random variable since $50$ is an upperbound.


  • Express your inequality in the form of $Pr(50-X ge c)$.







share|cite|improve this answer





















  • So it should be like this : P(50-X >= -10) ?
    – puffles
    Nov 14 at 11:23










  • $P(X le -10) = P(-X ge 10) = P(50-X ge 60)$, now apply Markov on $50-X$.
    – Siong Thye Goh
    Nov 14 at 11:24










  • Makes sense. Thanks a bunch!
    – puffles
    Nov 14 at 11:25










  • I needed to clarify one last thing. P(50-X >= 60) <= 1/3. Is this correct considering the typical formula of Markov inequality P(X >= a)? What I am trying to ask is that if a constant is added or subtracted in an interval such as in the above case, would it affect the final probability.
    – puffles
    Nov 15 at 15:26






  • 1




    yes, it is correct. if it makes you more comfortable, let $Y=50-X$ and check that $Y$ is nonnegative. If you perform some operations and prove that the two conditions are equivalent, then the probability stays the same.
    – Siong Thye Goh
    Nov 15 at 15:29











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2997868%2fmarkov-inequality-for-random-variables-with-negative-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote



accepted










Define new RV: S = 50 - R



E(S) = 30



P(R<=-10) = P(S>=60)



P(S>=60) = 30/60
= 1/2



You commented: I needed to clarify one last thing. P(50-X >= 60) <= 1/3



It should be 1/2 not 1/3.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • How is the expectation 30. Can you please explain?
    – puffles
    Nov 17 at 20:53










  • S = 50 -R so E(S) = 50 -E(R) . Since E(R) = 20. We get E(S) = 30
    – helloworld
    Nov 17 at 21:24

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










Define new RV: S = 50 - R



E(S) = 30



P(R<=-10) = P(S>=60)



P(S>=60) = 30/60
= 1/2



You commented: I needed to clarify one last thing. P(50-X >= 60) <= 1/3



It should be 1/2 not 1/3.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • How is the expectation 30. Can you please explain?
    – puffles
    Nov 17 at 20:53










  • S = 50 -R so E(S) = 50 -E(R) . Since E(R) = 20. We get E(S) = 30
    – helloworld
    Nov 17 at 21:24















up vote
0
down vote



accepted







up vote
0
down vote



accepted






Define new RV: S = 50 - R



E(S) = 30



P(R<=-10) = P(S>=60)



P(S>=60) = 30/60
= 1/2



You commented: I needed to clarify one last thing. P(50-X >= 60) <= 1/3



It should be 1/2 not 1/3.






share|cite|improve this answer












Define new RV: S = 50 - R



E(S) = 30



P(R<=-10) = P(S>=60)



P(S>=60) = 30/60
= 1/2



You commented: I needed to clarify one last thing. P(50-X >= 60) <= 1/3



It should be 1/2 not 1/3.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 17 at 20:17









helloworld

477




477












  • How is the expectation 30. Can you please explain?
    – puffles
    Nov 17 at 20:53










  • S = 50 -R so E(S) = 50 -E(R) . Since E(R) = 20. We get E(S) = 30
    – helloworld
    Nov 17 at 21:24




















  • How is the expectation 30. Can you please explain?
    – puffles
    Nov 17 at 20:53










  • S = 50 -R so E(S) = 50 -E(R) . Since E(R) = 20. We get E(S) = 30
    – helloworld
    Nov 17 at 21:24


















How is the expectation 30. Can you please explain?
– puffles
Nov 17 at 20:53




How is the expectation 30. Can you please explain?
– puffles
Nov 17 at 20:53












S = 50 -R so E(S) = 50 -E(R) . Since E(R) = 20. We get E(S) = 30
– helloworld
Nov 17 at 21:24






S = 50 -R so E(S) = 50 -E(R) . Since E(R) = 20. We get E(S) = 30
– helloworld
Nov 17 at 21:24












up vote
1
down vote













Hint:




  • $50-X$ is a nonnegative random variable since $50$ is an upperbound.


  • Express your inequality in the form of $Pr(50-X ge c)$.







share|cite|improve this answer





















  • So it should be like this : P(50-X >= -10) ?
    – puffles
    Nov 14 at 11:23










  • $P(X le -10) = P(-X ge 10) = P(50-X ge 60)$, now apply Markov on $50-X$.
    – Siong Thye Goh
    Nov 14 at 11:24










  • Makes sense. Thanks a bunch!
    – puffles
    Nov 14 at 11:25










  • I needed to clarify one last thing. P(50-X >= 60) <= 1/3. Is this correct considering the typical formula of Markov inequality P(X >= a)? What I am trying to ask is that if a constant is added or subtracted in an interval such as in the above case, would it affect the final probability.
    – puffles
    Nov 15 at 15:26






  • 1




    yes, it is correct. if it makes you more comfortable, let $Y=50-X$ and check that $Y$ is nonnegative. If you perform some operations and prove that the two conditions are equivalent, then the probability stays the same.
    – Siong Thye Goh
    Nov 15 at 15:29















up vote
1
down vote













Hint:




  • $50-X$ is a nonnegative random variable since $50$ is an upperbound.


  • Express your inequality in the form of $Pr(50-X ge c)$.







share|cite|improve this answer





















  • So it should be like this : P(50-X >= -10) ?
    – puffles
    Nov 14 at 11:23










  • $P(X le -10) = P(-X ge 10) = P(50-X ge 60)$, now apply Markov on $50-X$.
    – Siong Thye Goh
    Nov 14 at 11:24










  • Makes sense. Thanks a bunch!
    – puffles
    Nov 14 at 11:25










  • I needed to clarify one last thing. P(50-X >= 60) <= 1/3. Is this correct considering the typical formula of Markov inequality P(X >= a)? What I am trying to ask is that if a constant is added or subtracted in an interval such as in the above case, would it affect the final probability.
    – puffles
    Nov 15 at 15:26






  • 1




    yes, it is correct. if it makes you more comfortable, let $Y=50-X$ and check that $Y$ is nonnegative. If you perform some operations and prove that the two conditions are equivalent, then the probability stays the same.
    – Siong Thye Goh
    Nov 15 at 15:29













up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









Hint:




  • $50-X$ is a nonnegative random variable since $50$ is an upperbound.


  • Express your inequality in the form of $Pr(50-X ge c)$.







share|cite|improve this answer












Hint:




  • $50-X$ is a nonnegative random variable since $50$ is an upperbound.


  • Express your inequality in the form of $Pr(50-X ge c)$.








share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 14 at 8:38









Siong Thye Goh

94k1462114




94k1462114












  • So it should be like this : P(50-X >= -10) ?
    – puffles
    Nov 14 at 11:23










  • $P(X le -10) = P(-X ge 10) = P(50-X ge 60)$, now apply Markov on $50-X$.
    – Siong Thye Goh
    Nov 14 at 11:24










  • Makes sense. Thanks a bunch!
    – puffles
    Nov 14 at 11:25










  • I needed to clarify one last thing. P(50-X >= 60) <= 1/3. Is this correct considering the typical formula of Markov inequality P(X >= a)? What I am trying to ask is that if a constant is added or subtracted in an interval such as in the above case, would it affect the final probability.
    – puffles
    Nov 15 at 15:26






  • 1




    yes, it is correct. if it makes you more comfortable, let $Y=50-X$ and check that $Y$ is nonnegative. If you perform some operations and prove that the two conditions are equivalent, then the probability stays the same.
    – Siong Thye Goh
    Nov 15 at 15:29


















  • So it should be like this : P(50-X >= -10) ?
    – puffles
    Nov 14 at 11:23










  • $P(X le -10) = P(-X ge 10) = P(50-X ge 60)$, now apply Markov on $50-X$.
    – Siong Thye Goh
    Nov 14 at 11:24










  • Makes sense. Thanks a bunch!
    – puffles
    Nov 14 at 11:25










  • I needed to clarify one last thing. P(50-X >= 60) <= 1/3. Is this correct considering the typical formula of Markov inequality P(X >= a)? What I am trying to ask is that if a constant is added or subtracted in an interval such as in the above case, would it affect the final probability.
    – puffles
    Nov 15 at 15:26






  • 1




    yes, it is correct. if it makes you more comfortable, let $Y=50-X$ and check that $Y$ is nonnegative. If you perform some operations and prove that the two conditions are equivalent, then the probability stays the same.
    – Siong Thye Goh
    Nov 15 at 15:29
















So it should be like this : P(50-X >= -10) ?
– puffles
Nov 14 at 11:23




So it should be like this : P(50-X >= -10) ?
– puffles
Nov 14 at 11:23












$P(X le -10) = P(-X ge 10) = P(50-X ge 60)$, now apply Markov on $50-X$.
– Siong Thye Goh
Nov 14 at 11:24




$P(X le -10) = P(-X ge 10) = P(50-X ge 60)$, now apply Markov on $50-X$.
– Siong Thye Goh
Nov 14 at 11:24












Makes sense. Thanks a bunch!
– puffles
Nov 14 at 11:25




Makes sense. Thanks a bunch!
– puffles
Nov 14 at 11:25












I needed to clarify one last thing. P(50-X >= 60) <= 1/3. Is this correct considering the typical formula of Markov inequality P(X >= a)? What I am trying to ask is that if a constant is added or subtracted in an interval such as in the above case, would it affect the final probability.
– puffles
Nov 15 at 15:26




I needed to clarify one last thing. P(50-X >= 60) <= 1/3. Is this correct considering the typical formula of Markov inequality P(X >= a)? What I am trying to ask is that if a constant is added or subtracted in an interval such as in the above case, would it affect the final probability.
– puffles
Nov 15 at 15:26




1




1




yes, it is correct. if it makes you more comfortable, let $Y=50-X$ and check that $Y$ is nonnegative. If you perform some operations and prove that the two conditions are equivalent, then the probability stays the same.
– Siong Thye Goh
Nov 15 at 15:29




yes, it is correct. if it makes you more comfortable, let $Y=50-X$ and check that $Y$ is nonnegative. If you perform some operations and prove that the two conditions are equivalent, then the probability stays the same.
– Siong Thye Goh
Nov 15 at 15:29


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2997868%2fmarkov-inequality-for-random-variables-with-negative-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?