How should I represent the conjugate of a term in the denominator?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Using overline for a term in the denominator creates a cluttered look, and Bar results in a really faint line. Also I only know how to use Bar over one letter at a time.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,mathtools}

begin{document}
begin{align*}
frac{z_0 - z_1}{overline{z_0 - z_1}} +
frac{z_0 - z_1}{Bar{z}_0 - Bar{z}_1}
end{align*}
end{document}


enter image description here



I want to have a line that doesn't clash with the fraction line, but that also doesn't require squinting to observe. What are your recommendations? My best idea right now is to color the line gray, but I don't how to do that.



Edit: Actually, a thin line over the whole term, similar to the one produced by Bar, might just work.










share|improve this question









New contributor




user475924 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Please, don't color any line.
    – Sigur
    Nov 19 at 23:24






  • 1




    @Sigur "any color so long as it is black" (Henry Ford)
    – David Carlisle
    Nov 19 at 23:30










  • Not so good solution, but.... frac{,z_0 - z_1,}{overline{z_0 - z_1}}
    – Sigur
    Nov 19 at 23:30










  • Wait a minute... overline{z_0 - z_1} = bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1 (if these are complex numbers) and hence the whole expression simplifies to 2 frac{z_0 - z_1}{bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1}.
    – Henri Menke
    Nov 20 at 0:00










  • @HenriMenke The expression is meaningless I just wanted to demonstrate two styles of depicting the conjugate of the denominator. I suppose I shouldn't have separated the terms with a plus sign haha.
    – user475924
    Nov 20 at 19:03















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Using overline for a term in the denominator creates a cluttered look, and Bar results in a really faint line. Also I only know how to use Bar over one letter at a time.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,mathtools}

begin{document}
begin{align*}
frac{z_0 - z_1}{overline{z_0 - z_1}} +
frac{z_0 - z_1}{Bar{z}_0 - Bar{z}_1}
end{align*}
end{document}


enter image description here



I want to have a line that doesn't clash with the fraction line, but that also doesn't require squinting to observe. What are your recommendations? My best idea right now is to color the line gray, but I don't how to do that.



Edit: Actually, a thin line over the whole term, similar to the one produced by Bar, might just work.










share|improve this question









New contributor




user475924 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Please, don't color any line.
    – Sigur
    Nov 19 at 23:24






  • 1




    @Sigur "any color so long as it is black" (Henry Ford)
    – David Carlisle
    Nov 19 at 23:30










  • Not so good solution, but.... frac{,z_0 - z_1,}{overline{z_0 - z_1}}
    – Sigur
    Nov 19 at 23:30










  • Wait a minute... overline{z_0 - z_1} = bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1 (if these are complex numbers) and hence the whole expression simplifies to 2 frac{z_0 - z_1}{bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1}.
    – Henri Menke
    Nov 20 at 0:00










  • @HenriMenke The expression is meaningless I just wanted to demonstrate two styles of depicting the conjugate of the denominator. I suppose I shouldn't have separated the terms with a plus sign haha.
    – user475924
    Nov 20 at 19:03













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Using overline for a term in the denominator creates a cluttered look, and Bar results in a really faint line. Also I only know how to use Bar over one letter at a time.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,mathtools}

begin{document}
begin{align*}
frac{z_0 - z_1}{overline{z_0 - z_1}} +
frac{z_0 - z_1}{Bar{z}_0 - Bar{z}_1}
end{align*}
end{document}


enter image description here



I want to have a line that doesn't clash with the fraction line, but that also doesn't require squinting to observe. What are your recommendations? My best idea right now is to color the line gray, but I don't how to do that.



Edit: Actually, a thin line over the whole term, similar to the one produced by Bar, might just work.










share|improve this question









New contributor




user475924 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Using overline for a term in the denominator creates a cluttered look, and Bar results in a really faint line. Also I only know how to use Bar over one letter at a time.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,mathtools}

begin{document}
begin{align*}
frac{z_0 - z_1}{overline{z_0 - z_1}} +
frac{z_0 - z_1}{Bar{z}_0 - Bar{z}_1}
end{align*}
end{document}


enter image description here



I want to have a line that doesn't clash with the fraction line, but that also doesn't require squinting to observe. What are your recommendations? My best idea right now is to color the line gray, but I don't how to do that.



Edit: Actually, a thin line over the whole term, similar to the one produced by Bar, might just work.







math-mode amsmath






share|improve this question









New contributor




user475924 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




user475924 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 19 at 23:28









Sigur

23.3k354135




23.3k354135






New contributor




user475924 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Nov 19 at 23:17









user475924

182




182




New contributor




user475924 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user475924 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user475924 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Please, don't color any line.
    – Sigur
    Nov 19 at 23:24






  • 1




    @Sigur "any color so long as it is black" (Henry Ford)
    – David Carlisle
    Nov 19 at 23:30










  • Not so good solution, but.... frac{,z_0 - z_1,}{overline{z_0 - z_1}}
    – Sigur
    Nov 19 at 23:30










  • Wait a minute... overline{z_0 - z_1} = bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1 (if these are complex numbers) and hence the whole expression simplifies to 2 frac{z_0 - z_1}{bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1}.
    – Henri Menke
    Nov 20 at 0:00










  • @HenriMenke The expression is meaningless I just wanted to demonstrate two styles of depicting the conjugate of the denominator. I suppose I shouldn't have separated the terms with a plus sign haha.
    – user475924
    Nov 20 at 19:03


















  • Please, don't color any line.
    – Sigur
    Nov 19 at 23:24






  • 1




    @Sigur "any color so long as it is black" (Henry Ford)
    – David Carlisle
    Nov 19 at 23:30










  • Not so good solution, but.... frac{,z_0 - z_1,}{overline{z_0 - z_1}}
    – Sigur
    Nov 19 at 23:30










  • Wait a minute... overline{z_0 - z_1} = bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1 (if these are complex numbers) and hence the whole expression simplifies to 2 frac{z_0 - z_1}{bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1}.
    – Henri Menke
    Nov 20 at 0:00










  • @HenriMenke The expression is meaningless I just wanted to demonstrate two styles of depicting the conjugate of the denominator. I suppose I shouldn't have separated the terms with a plus sign haha.
    – user475924
    Nov 20 at 19:03
















Please, don't color any line.
– Sigur
Nov 19 at 23:24




Please, don't color any line.
– Sigur
Nov 19 at 23:24




1




1




@Sigur "any color so long as it is black" (Henry Ford)
– David Carlisle
Nov 19 at 23:30




@Sigur "any color so long as it is black" (Henry Ford)
– David Carlisle
Nov 19 at 23:30












Not so good solution, but.... frac{,z_0 - z_1,}{overline{z_0 - z_1}}
– Sigur
Nov 19 at 23:30




Not so good solution, but.... frac{,z_0 - z_1,}{overline{z_0 - z_1}}
– Sigur
Nov 19 at 23:30












Wait a minute... overline{z_0 - z_1} = bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1 (if these are complex numbers) and hence the whole expression simplifies to 2 frac{z_0 - z_1}{bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1}.
– Henri Menke
Nov 20 at 0:00




Wait a minute... overline{z_0 - z_1} = bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1 (if these are complex numbers) and hence the whole expression simplifies to 2 frac{z_0 - z_1}{bar{z}_0 - bar{z}_1}.
– Henri Menke
Nov 20 at 0:00












@HenriMenke The expression is meaningless I just wanted to demonstrate two styles of depicting the conjugate of the denominator. I suppose I shouldn't have separated the terms with a plus sign haha.
– user475924
Nov 20 at 19:03




@HenriMenke The expression is meaningless I just wanted to demonstrate two styles of depicting the conjugate of the denominator. I suppose I shouldn't have separated the terms with a plus sign haha.
– user475924
Nov 20 at 19:03










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













How about this?



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsfonts,mathtools}
newcommand{conjug}[1]{{fontdimen8textfont3=0.25ptmkern2muoverline{mkern-1mu #1mkern-2mu}}mkern2mu}

begin{document}

begin{align*}
frac{z_0 - z_1}{conjug{z_0 - z_1}} + frac{z_0 - z_1}{Bar{z}_0 - Bar{z}_1}
end{align*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • This is an improvement over what I have currently, but I feel it's still quite cluttered looking. A thin line in the style of Bar over both terms would be ideal I think. I don't know how to do that though.
    – user475924
    Nov 20 at 19:05










  • @user475924: I've modified the code to change the rule thickness and defined a conjug command. Is that more like you want?
    – Bernard
    Nov 20 at 23:11












  • @Bernard May be make the change of the fontdimen local? Also <<<<<<<<<<<<<<; <is tjh :P
    – Manuel
    Nov 20 at 23:13










  • @Manuel: You're right. I've inserted a pair of braces in the code. I don't understand your last sentence.
    – Bernard
    Nov 20 at 23:20










  • @Bernard You had that in your comment, it was just a joke. I see you edited.
    – Manuel
    Nov 21 at 0:05











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






user475924 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460847%2fhow-should-i-represent-the-conjugate-of-a-term-in-the-denominator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote













How about this?



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsfonts,mathtools}
newcommand{conjug}[1]{{fontdimen8textfont3=0.25ptmkern2muoverline{mkern-1mu #1mkern-2mu}}mkern2mu}

begin{document}

begin{align*}
frac{z_0 - z_1}{conjug{z_0 - z_1}} + frac{z_0 - z_1}{Bar{z}_0 - Bar{z}_1}
end{align*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • This is an improvement over what I have currently, but I feel it's still quite cluttered looking. A thin line in the style of Bar over both terms would be ideal I think. I don't know how to do that though.
    – user475924
    Nov 20 at 19:05










  • @user475924: I've modified the code to change the rule thickness and defined a conjug command. Is that more like you want?
    – Bernard
    Nov 20 at 23:11












  • @Bernard May be make the change of the fontdimen local? Also <<<<<<<<<<<<<<; <is tjh :P
    – Manuel
    Nov 20 at 23:13










  • @Manuel: You're right. I've inserted a pair of braces in the code. I don't understand your last sentence.
    – Bernard
    Nov 20 at 23:20










  • @Bernard You had that in your comment, it was just a joke. I see you edited.
    – Manuel
    Nov 21 at 0:05















up vote
3
down vote













How about this?



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsfonts,mathtools}
newcommand{conjug}[1]{{fontdimen8textfont3=0.25ptmkern2muoverline{mkern-1mu #1mkern-2mu}}mkern2mu}

begin{document}

begin{align*}
frac{z_0 - z_1}{conjug{z_0 - z_1}} + frac{z_0 - z_1}{Bar{z}_0 - Bar{z}_1}
end{align*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • This is an improvement over what I have currently, but I feel it's still quite cluttered looking. A thin line in the style of Bar over both terms would be ideal I think. I don't know how to do that though.
    – user475924
    Nov 20 at 19:05










  • @user475924: I've modified the code to change the rule thickness and defined a conjug command. Is that more like you want?
    – Bernard
    Nov 20 at 23:11












  • @Bernard May be make the change of the fontdimen local? Also <<<<<<<<<<<<<<; <is tjh :P
    – Manuel
    Nov 20 at 23:13










  • @Manuel: You're right. I've inserted a pair of braces in the code. I don't understand your last sentence.
    – Bernard
    Nov 20 at 23:20










  • @Bernard You had that in your comment, it was just a joke. I see you edited.
    – Manuel
    Nov 21 at 0:05













up vote
3
down vote










up vote
3
down vote









How about this?



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsfonts,mathtools}
newcommand{conjug}[1]{{fontdimen8textfont3=0.25ptmkern2muoverline{mkern-1mu #1mkern-2mu}}mkern2mu}

begin{document}

begin{align*}
frac{z_0 - z_1}{conjug{z_0 - z_1}} + frac{z_0 - z_1}{Bar{z}_0 - Bar{z}_1}
end{align*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer














How about this?



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsfonts,mathtools}
newcommand{conjug}[1]{{fontdimen8textfont3=0.25ptmkern2muoverline{mkern-1mu #1mkern-2mu}}mkern2mu}

begin{document}

begin{align*}
frac{z_0 - z_1}{conjug{z_0 - z_1}} + frac{z_0 - z_1}{Bar{z}_0 - Bar{z}_1}
end{align*}

end{document}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 20 at 23:20

























answered Nov 19 at 23:53









Bernard

162k767192




162k767192












  • This is an improvement over what I have currently, but I feel it's still quite cluttered looking. A thin line in the style of Bar over both terms would be ideal I think. I don't know how to do that though.
    – user475924
    Nov 20 at 19:05










  • @user475924: I've modified the code to change the rule thickness and defined a conjug command. Is that more like you want?
    – Bernard
    Nov 20 at 23:11












  • @Bernard May be make the change of the fontdimen local? Also <<<<<<<<<<<<<<; <is tjh :P
    – Manuel
    Nov 20 at 23:13










  • @Manuel: You're right. I've inserted a pair of braces in the code. I don't understand your last sentence.
    – Bernard
    Nov 20 at 23:20










  • @Bernard You had that in your comment, it was just a joke. I see you edited.
    – Manuel
    Nov 21 at 0:05


















  • This is an improvement over what I have currently, but I feel it's still quite cluttered looking. A thin line in the style of Bar over both terms would be ideal I think. I don't know how to do that though.
    – user475924
    Nov 20 at 19:05










  • @user475924: I've modified the code to change the rule thickness and defined a conjug command. Is that more like you want?
    – Bernard
    Nov 20 at 23:11












  • @Bernard May be make the change of the fontdimen local? Also <<<<<<<<<<<<<<; <is tjh :P
    – Manuel
    Nov 20 at 23:13










  • @Manuel: You're right. I've inserted a pair of braces in the code. I don't understand your last sentence.
    – Bernard
    Nov 20 at 23:20










  • @Bernard You had that in your comment, it was just a joke. I see you edited.
    – Manuel
    Nov 21 at 0:05
















This is an improvement over what I have currently, but I feel it's still quite cluttered looking. A thin line in the style of Bar over both terms would be ideal I think. I don't know how to do that though.
– user475924
Nov 20 at 19:05




This is an improvement over what I have currently, but I feel it's still quite cluttered looking. A thin line in the style of Bar over both terms would be ideal I think. I don't know how to do that though.
– user475924
Nov 20 at 19:05












@user475924: I've modified the code to change the rule thickness and defined a conjug command. Is that more like you want?
– Bernard
Nov 20 at 23:11






@user475924: I've modified the code to change the rule thickness and defined a conjug command. Is that more like you want?
– Bernard
Nov 20 at 23:11














@Bernard May be make the change of the fontdimen local? Also <<<<<<<<<<<<<<; <is tjh :P
– Manuel
Nov 20 at 23:13




@Bernard May be make the change of the fontdimen local? Also <<<<<<<<<<<<<<; <is tjh :P
– Manuel
Nov 20 at 23:13












@Manuel: You're right. I've inserted a pair of braces in the code. I don't understand your last sentence.
– Bernard
Nov 20 at 23:20




@Manuel: You're right. I've inserted a pair of braces in the code. I don't understand your last sentence.
– Bernard
Nov 20 at 23:20












@Bernard You had that in your comment, it was just a joke. I see you edited.
– Manuel
Nov 21 at 0:05




@Bernard You had that in your comment, it was just a joke. I see you edited.
– Manuel
Nov 21 at 0:05










user475924 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










 

draft saved


draft discarded


















user475924 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













user475924 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












user475924 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460847%2fhow-should-i-represent-the-conjugate-of-a-term-in-the-denominator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?