When can one atom be below the join of two distinct atoms?












2












$begingroup$


Consider three distinct atoms of a lattice $a,b,c$. When can we rule out the possibility that $cle alor b$?



So, to be clear, the question is: What is the weakest natural property of a lattice that rules out the above possibility?



It seems like we have this configuration for the standard "diamond" lattice example of a non-distributive lattice, so is this something that can only happen in non-distributive lattices? (This certainly can't happen for lattices with a unique irredundant join of join-irreducible elements representation...)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    Consider three distinct atoms of a lattice $a,b,c$. When can we rule out the possibility that $cle alor b$?



    So, to be clear, the question is: What is the weakest natural property of a lattice that rules out the above possibility?



    It seems like we have this configuration for the standard "diamond" lattice example of a non-distributive lattice, so is this something that can only happen in non-distributive lattices? (This certainly can't happen for lattices with a unique irredundant join of join-irreducible elements representation...)










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Consider three distinct atoms of a lattice $a,b,c$. When can we rule out the possibility that $cle alor b$?



      So, to be clear, the question is: What is the weakest natural property of a lattice that rules out the above possibility?



      It seems like we have this configuration for the standard "diamond" lattice example of a non-distributive lattice, so is this something that can only happen in non-distributive lattices? (This certainly can't happen for lattices with a unique irredundant join of join-irreducible elements representation...)










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Consider three distinct atoms of a lattice $a,b,c$. When can we rule out the possibility that $cle alor b$?



      So, to be clear, the question is: What is the weakest natural property of a lattice that rules out the above possibility?



      It seems like we have this configuration for the standard "diamond" lattice example of a non-distributive lattice, so is this something that can only happen in non-distributive lattices? (This certainly can't happen for lattices with a unique irredundant join of join-irreducible elements representation...)







      order-theory lattice-orders universal-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 17 '18 at 12:22







      Seamus

















      asked Dec 14 '18 at 12:18









      SeamusSeamus

      1,93321934




      1,93321934






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          In a distributive lattice, $cwedge (avee b) = (cwedge a)vee (cwedge b) = 0 vee 0 = 0ne c$ if $a,b,c$ are distinct atoms. So $cnotleq avee b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, so this is part of an answer. The other part is: are there (interesting) kinds of non-distributive lattice where we don't have this occurring?
            $endgroup$
            – Seamus
            Dec 14 '18 at 12:29












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039294%2fwhen-can-one-atom-be-below-the-join-of-two-distinct-atoms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          In a distributive lattice, $cwedge (avee b) = (cwedge a)vee (cwedge b) = 0 vee 0 = 0ne c$ if $a,b,c$ are distinct atoms. So $cnotleq avee b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, so this is part of an answer. The other part is: are there (interesting) kinds of non-distributive lattice where we don't have this occurring?
            $endgroup$
            – Seamus
            Dec 14 '18 at 12:29
















          3












          $begingroup$

          In a distributive lattice, $cwedge (avee b) = (cwedge a)vee (cwedge b) = 0 vee 0 = 0ne c$ if $a,b,c$ are distinct atoms. So $cnotleq avee b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, so this is part of an answer. The other part is: are there (interesting) kinds of non-distributive lattice where we don't have this occurring?
            $endgroup$
            – Seamus
            Dec 14 '18 at 12:29














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          In a distributive lattice, $cwedge (avee b) = (cwedge a)vee (cwedge b) = 0 vee 0 = 0ne c$ if $a,b,c$ are distinct atoms. So $cnotleq avee b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          In a distributive lattice, $cwedge (avee b) = (cwedge a)vee (cwedge b) = 0 vee 0 = 0ne c$ if $a,b,c$ are distinct atoms. So $cnotleq avee b$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 14 '18 at 12:26









          WuestenfuxWuestenfux

          5,4841513




          5,4841513












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, so this is part of an answer. The other part is: are there (interesting) kinds of non-distributive lattice where we don't have this occurring?
            $endgroup$
            – Seamus
            Dec 14 '18 at 12:29


















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, so this is part of an answer. The other part is: are there (interesting) kinds of non-distributive lattice where we don't have this occurring?
            $endgroup$
            – Seamus
            Dec 14 '18 at 12:29
















          $begingroup$
          Thanks, so this is part of an answer. The other part is: are there (interesting) kinds of non-distributive lattice where we don't have this occurring?
          $endgroup$
          – Seamus
          Dec 14 '18 at 12:29




          $begingroup$
          Thanks, so this is part of an answer. The other part is: are there (interesting) kinds of non-distributive lattice where we don't have this occurring?
          $endgroup$
          – Seamus
          Dec 14 '18 at 12:29


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039294%2fwhen-can-one-atom-be-below-the-join-of-two-distinct-atoms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

          ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

          Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?