Connection between the eigenfunctions of the compact operators $T[f](xin H_1)=int_{H_1}k(x,y)f(y)dy$ and...












0












$begingroup$


Let $H_1$ and $H_2$ be Hilbert spaces.



Suppose we have a compact integral operator $T:H_1 to H_1$ given by
$$
T[f](x) = int_{H_1} k(x,y)f(y)dy, quad quad x in H_1.
$$



Suppose we also have a compact integral operator $R:H_1 to H_2$ given by
$$
R[f](x) = int_{H_1} k(x,y)f(y)dy, quad quad x in H_2.
$$



As $R$ and $T$ are compact we have spectral decompositions
$$
T = sum_{n=0}^infty lambda_n^T langle phi_n^T,cdot rangle phi_n^T, quad quad R = sum_{n=0}^infty lambda_n^R langle phi_n^R,cdot rangle psi_n^R.
$$

As $T$ maps from $H_1$ to itself it can be written in terms of the eigenfunctions $phi_n^T in H_1$, whereas $R$ maps from $H_1$ to to $H_2$ so it is written in terms of the eigenfunctions $phi_n^R in H_1$ and $psi_n^R in H_2$.



As $R$ and $T$ are are very similar operators, I would like to know whether there is a connection between the eigenfunctions $phi_n^T$ and $phi_n^R$ which are both defined on $H_1$. For instance, can one of these functions be written in terms of the other?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    There are several issues with your question, that make it hard to understand what you are trying to ask. First, while it is possible to integrate over a Hilbert space in some sense, I doubt that's what you are trying to do; you write as if $f$ is a function with domain $H_1$, which I don't think is what you want. Second, you write as if ${phi_n^T}$ and ${psi_n^R}$ are orthonormal bases (are they?), in which case it seems you are assuming that your operators are selfadjoint; but you didn't say so. Third, did you really want $phi_n^R$?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Dec 13 '18 at 15:03


















0












$begingroup$


Let $H_1$ and $H_2$ be Hilbert spaces.



Suppose we have a compact integral operator $T:H_1 to H_1$ given by
$$
T[f](x) = int_{H_1} k(x,y)f(y)dy, quad quad x in H_1.
$$



Suppose we also have a compact integral operator $R:H_1 to H_2$ given by
$$
R[f](x) = int_{H_1} k(x,y)f(y)dy, quad quad x in H_2.
$$



As $R$ and $T$ are compact we have spectral decompositions
$$
T = sum_{n=0}^infty lambda_n^T langle phi_n^T,cdot rangle phi_n^T, quad quad R = sum_{n=0}^infty lambda_n^R langle phi_n^R,cdot rangle psi_n^R.
$$

As $T$ maps from $H_1$ to itself it can be written in terms of the eigenfunctions $phi_n^T in H_1$, whereas $R$ maps from $H_1$ to to $H_2$ so it is written in terms of the eigenfunctions $phi_n^R in H_1$ and $psi_n^R in H_2$.



As $R$ and $T$ are are very similar operators, I would like to know whether there is a connection between the eigenfunctions $phi_n^T$ and $phi_n^R$ which are both defined on $H_1$. For instance, can one of these functions be written in terms of the other?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    There are several issues with your question, that make it hard to understand what you are trying to ask. First, while it is possible to integrate over a Hilbert space in some sense, I doubt that's what you are trying to do; you write as if $f$ is a function with domain $H_1$, which I don't think is what you want. Second, you write as if ${phi_n^T}$ and ${psi_n^R}$ are orthonormal bases (are they?), in which case it seems you are assuming that your operators are selfadjoint; but you didn't say so. Third, did you really want $phi_n^R$?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Dec 13 '18 at 15:03
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $H_1$ and $H_2$ be Hilbert spaces.



Suppose we have a compact integral operator $T:H_1 to H_1$ given by
$$
T[f](x) = int_{H_1} k(x,y)f(y)dy, quad quad x in H_1.
$$



Suppose we also have a compact integral operator $R:H_1 to H_2$ given by
$$
R[f](x) = int_{H_1} k(x,y)f(y)dy, quad quad x in H_2.
$$



As $R$ and $T$ are compact we have spectral decompositions
$$
T = sum_{n=0}^infty lambda_n^T langle phi_n^T,cdot rangle phi_n^T, quad quad R = sum_{n=0}^infty lambda_n^R langle phi_n^R,cdot rangle psi_n^R.
$$

As $T$ maps from $H_1$ to itself it can be written in terms of the eigenfunctions $phi_n^T in H_1$, whereas $R$ maps from $H_1$ to to $H_2$ so it is written in terms of the eigenfunctions $phi_n^R in H_1$ and $psi_n^R in H_2$.



As $R$ and $T$ are are very similar operators, I would like to know whether there is a connection between the eigenfunctions $phi_n^T$ and $phi_n^R$ which are both defined on $H_1$. For instance, can one of these functions be written in terms of the other?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $H_1$ and $H_2$ be Hilbert spaces.



Suppose we have a compact integral operator $T:H_1 to H_1$ given by
$$
T[f](x) = int_{H_1} k(x,y)f(y)dy, quad quad x in H_1.
$$



Suppose we also have a compact integral operator $R:H_1 to H_2$ given by
$$
R[f](x) = int_{H_1} k(x,y)f(y)dy, quad quad x in H_2.
$$



As $R$ and $T$ are compact we have spectral decompositions
$$
T = sum_{n=0}^infty lambda_n^T langle phi_n^T,cdot rangle phi_n^T, quad quad R = sum_{n=0}^infty lambda_n^R langle phi_n^R,cdot rangle psi_n^R.
$$

As $T$ maps from $H_1$ to itself it can be written in terms of the eigenfunctions $phi_n^T in H_1$, whereas $R$ maps from $H_1$ to to $H_2$ so it is written in terms of the eigenfunctions $phi_n^R in H_1$ and $psi_n^R in H_2$.



As $R$ and $T$ are are very similar operators, I would like to know whether there is a connection between the eigenfunctions $phi_n^T$ and $phi_n^R$ which are both defined on $H_1$. For instance, can one of these functions be written in terms of the other?







functional-analysis operator-theory hilbert-spaces spectral-theory integral-equations






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 13 '18 at 8:28









sonicboomsonicboom

3,73082853




3,73082853












  • $begingroup$
    There are several issues with your question, that make it hard to understand what you are trying to ask. First, while it is possible to integrate over a Hilbert space in some sense, I doubt that's what you are trying to do; you write as if $f$ is a function with domain $H_1$, which I don't think is what you want. Second, you write as if ${phi_n^T}$ and ${psi_n^R}$ are orthonormal bases (are they?), in which case it seems you are assuming that your operators are selfadjoint; but you didn't say so. Third, did you really want $phi_n^R$?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Dec 13 '18 at 15:03




















  • $begingroup$
    There are several issues with your question, that make it hard to understand what you are trying to ask. First, while it is possible to integrate over a Hilbert space in some sense, I doubt that's what you are trying to do; you write as if $f$ is a function with domain $H_1$, which I don't think is what you want. Second, you write as if ${phi_n^T}$ and ${psi_n^R}$ are orthonormal bases (are they?), in which case it seems you are assuming that your operators are selfadjoint; but you didn't say so. Third, did you really want $phi_n^R$?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Argerami
    Dec 13 '18 at 15:03


















$begingroup$
There are several issues with your question, that make it hard to understand what you are trying to ask. First, while it is possible to integrate over a Hilbert space in some sense, I doubt that's what you are trying to do; you write as if $f$ is a function with domain $H_1$, which I don't think is what you want. Second, you write as if ${phi_n^T}$ and ${psi_n^R}$ are orthonormal bases (are they?), in which case it seems you are assuming that your operators are selfadjoint; but you didn't say so. Third, did you really want $phi_n^R$?
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Dec 13 '18 at 15:03






$begingroup$
There are several issues with your question, that make it hard to understand what you are trying to ask. First, while it is possible to integrate over a Hilbert space in some sense, I doubt that's what you are trying to do; you write as if $f$ is a function with domain $H_1$, which I don't think is what you want. Second, you write as if ${phi_n^T}$ and ${psi_n^R}$ are orthonormal bases (are they?), in which case it seems you are assuming that your operators are selfadjoint; but you didn't say so. Third, did you really want $phi_n^R$?
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Dec 13 '18 at 15:03












0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037755%2fconnection-between-the-eigenfunctions-of-the-compact-operators-tfx-in-h-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037755%2fconnection-between-the-eigenfunctions-of-the-compact-operators-tfx-in-h-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?