Compute the degree of the splitting field of $x^{12} - 2$ over $mathbb{Q}$ and describe its Galois Group as a...












2












$begingroup$


I have the polynomial $f(x) = x^{12} - 2$. I have to compute the degree of the splitting field over $mathbb{Q}$ and describe its Galois Group as a semidirect product.



Clearly the splitting field is $E= mathbb{Q}(zeta,alpha$), where $zeta$ is a primitve $12^{text{th}}$ root of unity and $alpha = sqrt[12]{2}$. The pertinent intermediate fields are $L=mathbb{Q}(alpha)$ and $K=mathbb{Q}(zeta)$. Since we have the degree of the splitting field as $[E:mathbb{Q}]=48$, with $[L:mathbb{Q}]=12$ and $[K:mathbb{Q}]=varphi(12)=4$



I look at $sigma:zeta mapsto zeta, alpha mapstozeta cdot alpha$, this automorphism fixes $K$ and is of order $12$, therefore we have $N = text{Gal}(E/K) = langle sigma rangle cong C_{12}$, and we know $N$ is a normal subgroup of $G = text{Gal}(E/mathbb{Q})$, since $K/mathbb{Q}$ is Galois.



Now, consider $tau_1, tau_2 in G$, fixing $alpha$ where $tau_1(zeta)=zeta^5, tau_2(zeta)=zeta^7$, and $tau_2 circ tau_1(zeta)=zeta^{11}$. This automorphism fixes $L$ and is of order $4$, and therefore $H = text{Gal}(E/L) = langle tau_1,tau_2 rangle cong K_{4}$, the Klein four-group.



Am I correct? Is there more I can add in my reasonging? And how do I conclude that $G= C_{12} rtimes K_{4}$? Any help is appreciated










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    My first reaction was "just do polgalois in PARI"... and then they don't support polynomials of degree > 11
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Dec 31 '18 at 14:15
















2












$begingroup$


I have the polynomial $f(x) = x^{12} - 2$. I have to compute the degree of the splitting field over $mathbb{Q}$ and describe its Galois Group as a semidirect product.



Clearly the splitting field is $E= mathbb{Q}(zeta,alpha$), where $zeta$ is a primitve $12^{text{th}}$ root of unity and $alpha = sqrt[12]{2}$. The pertinent intermediate fields are $L=mathbb{Q}(alpha)$ and $K=mathbb{Q}(zeta)$. Since we have the degree of the splitting field as $[E:mathbb{Q}]=48$, with $[L:mathbb{Q}]=12$ and $[K:mathbb{Q}]=varphi(12)=4$



I look at $sigma:zeta mapsto zeta, alpha mapstozeta cdot alpha$, this automorphism fixes $K$ and is of order $12$, therefore we have $N = text{Gal}(E/K) = langle sigma rangle cong C_{12}$, and we know $N$ is a normal subgroup of $G = text{Gal}(E/mathbb{Q})$, since $K/mathbb{Q}$ is Galois.



Now, consider $tau_1, tau_2 in G$, fixing $alpha$ where $tau_1(zeta)=zeta^5, tau_2(zeta)=zeta^7$, and $tau_2 circ tau_1(zeta)=zeta^{11}$. This automorphism fixes $L$ and is of order $4$, and therefore $H = text{Gal}(E/L) = langle tau_1,tau_2 rangle cong K_{4}$, the Klein four-group.



Am I correct? Is there more I can add in my reasonging? And how do I conclude that $G= C_{12} rtimes K_{4}$? Any help is appreciated










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    My first reaction was "just do polgalois in PARI"... and then they don't support polynomials of degree > 11
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Dec 31 '18 at 14:15














2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


I have the polynomial $f(x) = x^{12} - 2$. I have to compute the degree of the splitting field over $mathbb{Q}$ and describe its Galois Group as a semidirect product.



Clearly the splitting field is $E= mathbb{Q}(zeta,alpha$), where $zeta$ is a primitve $12^{text{th}}$ root of unity and $alpha = sqrt[12]{2}$. The pertinent intermediate fields are $L=mathbb{Q}(alpha)$ and $K=mathbb{Q}(zeta)$. Since we have the degree of the splitting field as $[E:mathbb{Q}]=48$, with $[L:mathbb{Q}]=12$ and $[K:mathbb{Q}]=varphi(12)=4$



I look at $sigma:zeta mapsto zeta, alpha mapstozeta cdot alpha$, this automorphism fixes $K$ and is of order $12$, therefore we have $N = text{Gal}(E/K) = langle sigma rangle cong C_{12}$, and we know $N$ is a normal subgroup of $G = text{Gal}(E/mathbb{Q})$, since $K/mathbb{Q}$ is Galois.



Now, consider $tau_1, tau_2 in G$, fixing $alpha$ where $tau_1(zeta)=zeta^5, tau_2(zeta)=zeta^7$, and $tau_2 circ tau_1(zeta)=zeta^{11}$. This automorphism fixes $L$ and is of order $4$, and therefore $H = text{Gal}(E/L) = langle tau_1,tau_2 rangle cong K_{4}$, the Klein four-group.



Am I correct? Is there more I can add in my reasonging? And how do I conclude that $G= C_{12} rtimes K_{4}$? Any help is appreciated










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have the polynomial $f(x) = x^{12} - 2$. I have to compute the degree of the splitting field over $mathbb{Q}$ and describe its Galois Group as a semidirect product.



Clearly the splitting field is $E= mathbb{Q}(zeta,alpha$), where $zeta$ is a primitve $12^{text{th}}$ root of unity and $alpha = sqrt[12]{2}$. The pertinent intermediate fields are $L=mathbb{Q}(alpha)$ and $K=mathbb{Q}(zeta)$. Since we have the degree of the splitting field as $[E:mathbb{Q}]=48$, with $[L:mathbb{Q}]=12$ and $[K:mathbb{Q}]=varphi(12)=4$



I look at $sigma:zeta mapsto zeta, alpha mapstozeta cdot alpha$, this automorphism fixes $K$ and is of order $12$, therefore we have $N = text{Gal}(E/K) = langle sigma rangle cong C_{12}$, and we know $N$ is a normal subgroup of $G = text{Gal}(E/mathbb{Q})$, since $K/mathbb{Q}$ is Galois.



Now, consider $tau_1, tau_2 in G$, fixing $alpha$ where $tau_1(zeta)=zeta^5, tau_2(zeta)=zeta^7$, and $tau_2 circ tau_1(zeta)=zeta^{11}$. This automorphism fixes $L$ and is of order $4$, and therefore $H = text{Gal}(E/L) = langle tau_1,tau_2 rangle cong K_{4}$, the Klein four-group.



Am I correct? Is there more I can add in my reasonging? And how do I conclude that $G= C_{12} rtimes K_{4}$? Any help is appreciated







galois-theory splitting-field galois-extensions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 24 '18 at 0:20







Naweed G. Seldon

















asked Dec 23 '18 at 23:33









Naweed G. SeldonNaweed G. Seldon

1,319419




1,319419












  • $begingroup$
    My first reaction was "just do polgalois in PARI"... and then they don't support polynomials of degree > 11
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Dec 31 '18 at 14:15


















  • $begingroup$
    My first reaction was "just do polgalois in PARI"... and then they don't support polynomials of degree > 11
    $endgroup$
    – Kenny Lau
    Dec 31 '18 at 14:15
















$begingroup$
My first reaction was "just do polgalois in PARI"... and then they don't support polynomials of degree > 11
$endgroup$
– Kenny Lau
Dec 31 '18 at 14:15




$begingroup$
My first reaction was "just do polgalois in PARI"... and then they don't support polynomials of degree > 11
$endgroup$
– Kenny Lau
Dec 31 '18 at 14:15










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

$newcommand{Gal}{operatorname{Gal}}$Preliminaries:




  • $operatorname{irr}(zeta, Bbb Q) = Phi_{12}(X) = X^4-X^2+1$

  • $zeta = dfrac{sqrt3+i}2$

  • $sqrt3 = zeta + zeta^{-1}$

  • $i = zeta + zeta^5$

  • $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta)/Bbb Q) = C_2 times C_2$

  • Subfields are $Bbb Q$, $Bbb Q(sqrt3)$, $Bbb Q(i)$, $Bbb Q(sqrt{-3})$, $Bbb Q(zeta)$.




We wish to determine $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta, alpha) / Bbb Q(zeta))$, so we wish to factorize $X^{12}-2$ in $Bbb Q(zeta)$. We claim that it is irreducible.



Since $Bbb Q(zeta)$ has all the $12$th roots of unity, and $Bbb Z[zeta]$ is a Euclidean domain, it suffices to show that $2$ is neither a square nor a cube.



It is clear that $2$ is not a cube, since $N_{Bbb Q(zeta)/Bbb Q}(2) = 16$ is not a cube.



That $2$ is not a square, i.e. $sqrt 2 notin Bbb Q(zeta)$, is clear, since none of the quadratic subfields of $Bbb Q(zeta)$ contain $sqrt 2$.





Since $X^{12} - 2 in Bbb Q(zeta)[X]$ is irreducible, we can know that $[Bbb Q(zeta,alpha) : Bbb Q(zeta)] = 12$ and $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha) : Bbb Q(zeta)) = C_{12}$. Thus we have an exact sequence:
$$1 to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q(zeta)) to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q) to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta)/Bbb Q) to 1$$



i.e.
$$1 to C_{12} to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q) to C_2 times C_2 to 1$$



Now $G = Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q) = langle rho, sigma, tau rangle$, where:





  • $rho(zeta) = zeta$, $rho(alpha) = zeta alpha$


  • $sigma(zeta) = zeta^5$, $sigma(alpha) = alpha$


  • $tau(zeta) = zeta^{11}$, $tau(alpha) = alpha$


It is clear that $N = langle rho rangle$ is the normal subgroup $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q(zeta))$ with $H = langle sigma, tau rangle$ being its complement, thus $G = N rtimes H$.



To determine the action, we need to compute $sigma rho sigma^{-1}$ and $tau rho tau^{-1}$:




  • $sigma rho sigma^{-1} alpha = sigma rho alpha = sigma (zeta alpha) = zeta^5 alpha$

  • $tau rho tau^{-1} alpha = tau rho alpha = tau (zeta alpha) = zeta^{11} alpha$


So $sigma rho sigma^{-1} = rho^5$ and $tau rho tau^{-1} = rho^{11}$, and that is the group action that determines the semidirect product. The group presentation is:
$$G = langle rho, sigma, tau mid rho^{12} = sigma^2 = tau^2 = (sigma tau)^2 = 1, sigma rho sigma^{-1} = rho^5, tau rho tau^{-1} = rho^{11} rangle$$



And another way of presenting the group is $C_{12} rtimes operatorname{Aut}(C_{12})$ with the identity homomorphism.





The problem with your attempt is that, while every element of $G$ must send $zeta$ and $alpha$ to one of their respective conjugates, not every such pair of conjugates must correspond to an element of $G$.



In other words, we have a set-theoretic injection $G to {text{conjugates of $zeta$}} times {text{conjugates of $alpha$}}$ which you withou justification assumed to be surjective.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050803%2fcompute-the-degree-of-the-splitting-field-of-x12-2-over-mathbbq-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    $newcommand{Gal}{operatorname{Gal}}$Preliminaries:




    • $operatorname{irr}(zeta, Bbb Q) = Phi_{12}(X) = X^4-X^2+1$

    • $zeta = dfrac{sqrt3+i}2$

    • $sqrt3 = zeta + zeta^{-1}$

    • $i = zeta + zeta^5$

    • $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta)/Bbb Q) = C_2 times C_2$

    • Subfields are $Bbb Q$, $Bbb Q(sqrt3)$, $Bbb Q(i)$, $Bbb Q(sqrt{-3})$, $Bbb Q(zeta)$.




    We wish to determine $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta, alpha) / Bbb Q(zeta))$, so we wish to factorize $X^{12}-2$ in $Bbb Q(zeta)$. We claim that it is irreducible.



    Since $Bbb Q(zeta)$ has all the $12$th roots of unity, and $Bbb Z[zeta]$ is a Euclidean domain, it suffices to show that $2$ is neither a square nor a cube.



    It is clear that $2$ is not a cube, since $N_{Bbb Q(zeta)/Bbb Q}(2) = 16$ is not a cube.



    That $2$ is not a square, i.e. $sqrt 2 notin Bbb Q(zeta)$, is clear, since none of the quadratic subfields of $Bbb Q(zeta)$ contain $sqrt 2$.





    Since $X^{12} - 2 in Bbb Q(zeta)[X]$ is irreducible, we can know that $[Bbb Q(zeta,alpha) : Bbb Q(zeta)] = 12$ and $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha) : Bbb Q(zeta)) = C_{12}$. Thus we have an exact sequence:
    $$1 to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q(zeta)) to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q) to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta)/Bbb Q) to 1$$



    i.e.
    $$1 to C_{12} to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q) to C_2 times C_2 to 1$$



    Now $G = Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q) = langle rho, sigma, tau rangle$, where:





    • $rho(zeta) = zeta$, $rho(alpha) = zeta alpha$


    • $sigma(zeta) = zeta^5$, $sigma(alpha) = alpha$


    • $tau(zeta) = zeta^{11}$, $tau(alpha) = alpha$


    It is clear that $N = langle rho rangle$ is the normal subgroup $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q(zeta))$ with $H = langle sigma, tau rangle$ being its complement, thus $G = N rtimes H$.



    To determine the action, we need to compute $sigma rho sigma^{-1}$ and $tau rho tau^{-1}$:




    • $sigma rho sigma^{-1} alpha = sigma rho alpha = sigma (zeta alpha) = zeta^5 alpha$

    • $tau rho tau^{-1} alpha = tau rho alpha = tau (zeta alpha) = zeta^{11} alpha$


    So $sigma rho sigma^{-1} = rho^5$ and $tau rho tau^{-1} = rho^{11}$, and that is the group action that determines the semidirect product. The group presentation is:
    $$G = langle rho, sigma, tau mid rho^{12} = sigma^2 = tau^2 = (sigma tau)^2 = 1, sigma rho sigma^{-1} = rho^5, tau rho tau^{-1} = rho^{11} rangle$$



    And another way of presenting the group is $C_{12} rtimes operatorname{Aut}(C_{12})$ with the identity homomorphism.





    The problem with your attempt is that, while every element of $G$ must send $zeta$ and $alpha$ to one of their respective conjugates, not every such pair of conjugates must correspond to an element of $G$.



    In other words, we have a set-theoretic injection $G to {text{conjugates of $zeta$}} times {text{conjugates of $alpha$}}$ which you withou justification assumed to be surjective.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      $newcommand{Gal}{operatorname{Gal}}$Preliminaries:




      • $operatorname{irr}(zeta, Bbb Q) = Phi_{12}(X) = X^4-X^2+1$

      • $zeta = dfrac{sqrt3+i}2$

      • $sqrt3 = zeta + zeta^{-1}$

      • $i = zeta + zeta^5$

      • $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta)/Bbb Q) = C_2 times C_2$

      • Subfields are $Bbb Q$, $Bbb Q(sqrt3)$, $Bbb Q(i)$, $Bbb Q(sqrt{-3})$, $Bbb Q(zeta)$.




      We wish to determine $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta, alpha) / Bbb Q(zeta))$, so we wish to factorize $X^{12}-2$ in $Bbb Q(zeta)$. We claim that it is irreducible.



      Since $Bbb Q(zeta)$ has all the $12$th roots of unity, and $Bbb Z[zeta]$ is a Euclidean domain, it suffices to show that $2$ is neither a square nor a cube.



      It is clear that $2$ is not a cube, since $N_{Bbb Q(zeta)/Bbb Q}(2) = 16$ is not a cube.



      That $2$ is not a square, i.e. $sqrt 2 notin Bbb Q(zeta)$, is clear, since none of the quadratic subfields of $Bbb Q(zeta)$ contain $sqrt 2$.





      Since $X^{12} - 2 in Bbb Q(zeta)[X]$ is irreducible, we can know that $[Bbb Q(zeta,alpha) : Bbb Q(zeta)] = 12$ and $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha) : Bbb Q(zeta)) = C_{12}$. Thus we have an exact sequence:
      $$1 to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q(zeta)) to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q) to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta)/Bbb Q) to 1$$



      i.e.
      $$1 to C_{12} to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q) to C_2 times C_2 to 1$$



      Now $G = Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q) = langle rho, sigma, tau rangle$, where:





      • $rho(zeta) = zeta$, $rho(alpha) = zeta alpha$


      • $sigma(zeta) = zeta^5$, $sigma(alpha) = alpha$


      • $tau(zeta) = zeta^{11}$, $tau(alpha) = alpha$


      It is clear that $N = langle rho rangle$ is the normal subgroup $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q(zeta))$ with $H = langle sigma, tau rangle$ being its complement, thus $G = N rtimes H$.



      To determine the action, we need to compute $sigma rho sigma^{-1}$ and $tau rho tau^{-1}$:




      • $sigma rho sigma^{-1} alpha = sigma rho alpha = sigma (zeta alpha) = zeta^5 alpha$

      • $tau rho tau^{-1} alpha = tau rho alpha = tau (zeta alpha) = zeta^{11} alpha$


      So $sigma rho sigma^{-1} = rho^5$ and $tau rho tau^{-1} = rho^{11}$, and that is the group action that determines the semidirect product. The group presentation is:
      $$G = langle rho, sigma, tau mid rho^{12} = sigma^2 = tau^2 = (sigma tau)^2 = 1, sigma rho sigma^{-1} = rho^5, tau rho tau^{-1} = rho^{11} rangle$$



      And another way of presenting the group is $C_{12} rtimes operatorname{Aut}(C_{12})$ with the identity homomorphism.





      The problem with your attempt is that, while every element of $G$ must send $zeta$ and $alpha$ to one of their respective conjugates, not every such pair of conjugates must correspond to an element of $G$.



      In other words, we have a set-theoretic injection $G to {text{conjugates of $zeta$}} times {text{conjugates of $alpha$}}$ which you withou justification assumed to be surjective.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        $newcommand{Gal}{operatorname{Gal}}$Preliminaries:




        • $operatorname{irr}(zeta, Bbb Q) = Phi_{12}(X) = X^4-X^2+1$

        • $zeta = dfrac{sqrt3+i}2$

        • $sqrt3 = zeta + zeta^{-1}$

        • $i = zeta + zeta^5$

        • $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta)/Bbb Q) = C_2 times C_2$

        • Subfields are $Bbb Q$, $Bbb Q(sqrt3)$, $Bbb Q(i)$, $Bbb Q(sqrt{-3})$, $Bbb Q(zeta)$.




        We wish to determine $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta, alpha) / Bbb Q(zeta))$, so we wish to factorize $X^{12}-2$ in $Bbb Q(zeta)$. We claim that it is irreducible.



        Since $Bbb Q(zeta)$ has all the $12$th roots of unity, and $Bbb Z[zeta]$ is a Euclidean domain, it suffices to show that $2$ is neither a square nor a cube.



        It is clear that $2$ is not a cube, since $N_{Bbb Q(zeta)/Bbb Q}(2) = 16$ is not a cube.



        That $2$ is not a square, i.e. $sqrt 2 notin Bbb Q(zeta)$, is clear, since none of the quadratic subfields of $Bbb Q(zeta)$ contain $sqrt 2$.





        Since $X^{12} - 2 in Bbb Q(zeta)[X]$ is irreducible, we can know that $[Bbb Q(zeta,alpha) : Bbb Q(zeta)] = 12$ and $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha) : Bbb Q(zeta)) = C_{12}$. Thus we have an exact sequence:
        $$1 to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q(zeta)) to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q) to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta)/Bbb Q) to 1$$



        i.e.
        $$1 to C_{12} to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q) to C_2 times C_2 to 1$$



        Now $G = Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q) = langle rho, sigma, tau rangle$, where:





        • $rho(zeta) = zeta$, $rho(alpha) = zeta alpha$


        • $sigma(zeta) = zeta^5$, $sigma(alpha) = alpha$


        • $tau(zeta) = zeta^{11}$, $tau(alpha) = alpha$


        It is clear that $N = langle rho rangle$ is the normal subgroup $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q(zeta))$ with $H = langle sigma, tau rangle$ being its complement, thus $G = N rtimes H$.



        To determine the action, we need to compute $sigma rho sigma^{-1}$ and $tau rho tau^{-1}$:




        • $sigma rho sigma^{-1} alpha = sigma rho alpha = sigma (zeta alpha) = zeta^5 alpha$

        • $tau rho tau^{-1} alpha = tau rho alpha = tau (zeta alpha) = zeta^{11} alpha$


        So $sigma rho sigma^{-1} = rho^5$ and $tau rho tau^{-1} = rho^{11}$, and that is the group action that determines the semidirect product. The group presentation is:
        $$G = langle rho, sigma, tau mid rho^{12} = sigma^2 = tau^2 = (sigma tau)^2 = 1, sigma rho sigma^{-1} = rho^5, tau rho tau^{-1} = rho^{11} rangle$$



        And another way of presenting the group is $C_{12} rtimes operatorname{Aut}(C_{12})$ with the identity homomorphism.





        The problem with your attempt is that, while every element of $G$ must send $zeta$ and $alpha$ to one of their respective conjugates, not every such pair of conjugates must correspond to an element of $G$.



        In other words, we have a set-theoretic injection $G to {text{conjugates of $zeta$}} times {text{conjugates of $alpha$}}$ which you withou justification assumed to be surjective.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        $newcommand{Gal}{operatorname{Gal}}$Preliminaries:




        • $operatorname{irr}(zeta, Bbb Q) = Phi_{12}(X) = X^4-X^2+1$

        • $zeta = dfrac{sqrt3+i}2$

        • $sqrt3 = zeta + zeta^{-1}$

        • $i = zeta + zeta^5$

        • $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta)/Bbb Q) = C_2 times C_2$

        • Subfields are $Bbb Q$, $Bbb Q(sqrt3)$, $Bbb Q(i)$, $Bbb Q(sqrt{-3})$, $Bbb Q(zeta)$.




        We wish to determine $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta, alpha) / Bbb Q(zeta))$, so we wish to factorize $X^{12}-2$ in $Bbb Q(zeta)$. We claim that it is irreducible.



        Since $Bbb Q(zeta)$ has all the $12$th roots of unity, and $Bbb Z[zeta]$ is a Euclidean domain, it suffices to show that $2$ is neither a square nor a cube.



        It is clear that $2$ is not a cube, since $N_{Bbb Q(zeta)/Bbb Q}(2) = 16$ is not a cube.



        That $2$ is not a square, i.e. $sqrt 2 notin Bbb Q(zeta)$, is clear, since none of the quadratic subfields of $Bbb Q(zeta)$ contain $sqrt 2$.





        Since $X^{12} - 2 in Bbb Q(zeta)[X]$ is irreducible, we can know that $[Bbb Q(zeta,alpha) : Bbb Q(zeta)] = 12$ and $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha) : Bbb Q(zeta)) = C_{12}$. Thus we have an exact sequence:
        $$1 to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q(zeta)) to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q) to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta)/Bbb Q) to 1$$



        i.e.
        $$1 to C_{12} to Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q) to C_2 times C_2 to 1$$



        Now $G = Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q) = langle rho, sigma, tau rangle$, where:





        • $rho(zeta) = zeta$, $rho(alpha) = zeta alpha$


        • $sigma(zeta) = zeta^5$, $sigma(alpha) = alpha$


        • $tau(zeta) = zeta^{11}$, $tau(alpha) = alpha$


        It is clear that $N = langle rho rangle$ is the normal subgroup $Gal(Bbb Q(zeta,alpha)/Bbb Q(zeta))$ with $H = langle sigma, tau rangle$ being its complement, thus $G = N rtimes H$.



        To determine the action, we need to compute $sigma rho sigma^{-1}$ and $tau rho tau^{-1}$:




        • $sigma rho sigma^{-1} alpha = sigma rho alpha = sigma (zeta alpha) = zeta^5 alpha$

        • $tau rho tau^{-1} alpha = tau rho alpha = tau (zeta alpha) = zeta^{11} alpha$


        So $sigma rho sigma^{-1} = rho^5$ and $tau rho tau^{-1} = rho^{11}$, and that is the group action that determines the semidirect product. The group presentation is:
        $$G = langle rho, sigma, tau mid rho^{12} = sigma^2 = tau^2 = (sigma tau)^2 = 1, sigma rho sigma^{-1} = rho^5, tau rho tau^{-1} = rho^{11} rangle$$



        And another way of presenting the group is $C_{12} rtimes operatorname{Aut}(C_{12})$ with the identity homomorphism.





        The problem with your attempt is that, while every element of $G$ must send $zeta$ and $alpha$ to one of their respective conjugates, not every such pair of conjugates must correspond to an element of $G$.



        In other words, we have a set-theoretic injection $G to {text{conjugates of $zeta$}} times {text{conjugates of $alpha$}}$ which you withou justification assumed to be surjective.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 31 '18 at 21:24









        Kenny LauKenny Lau

        20.1k2260




        20.1k2260






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050803%2fcompute-the-degree-of-the-splitting-field-of-x12-2-over-mathbbq-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

            ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

            Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?