Why do we use $Df$ rather than $f'$ for the derivative of a multivariable function?












2












$begingroup$


Is there any reason we use $Df$ for derivatives of multivariable functions but $f'$ derivatives of single variable functions despite having a definition that works for both:



$$Df(c) = f'(c) = L iff lim_{x to c} frac{f(x) - f(c) - L(x-c)}{||x-c||} = 0$$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You could do this. I've seen people do $f'_x$ to refer to the $x$ partial though.
    $endgroup$
    – Alfred Yerger
    Dec 8 '18 at 19:52










  • $begingroup$
    I'm asking why the notation changed when multivariable calculus was created, rather than keeping the old $f'$ notation.
    $endgroup$
    – Stefan
    Dec 8 '18 at 19:54










  • $begingroup$
    The notation didn't necessarily change. $f'$ is Lagrange's notation and $Df$ is Euler's notation. Both of them had notations for multivariate functions, $f^{'}_{''}$ vs $D_{xy}$ for example. I'm not entirely sure if you can pin down a reason why Euler's is more popular for multiple variables, but I can guess that it's just do to clarity. And Lagrange's notation is clearer and more concise for a single variable.
    $endgroup$
    – Dando18
    Dec 8 '18 at 20:01










  • $begingroup$
    I think the main reason is that there's much more complexity in multivariate derivatives. You have total derivatives, partial derivatives, and the Jacobian. Spivak uses prime notation to refer to the Jacobian in "Calculus on Manifolds", so it's not entirely abandoned.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexanderJ93
    Dec 8 '18 at 20:14
















2












$begingroup$


Is there any reason we use $Df$ for derivatives of multivariable functions but $f'$ derivatives of single variable functions despite having a definition that works for both:



$$Df(c) = f'(c) = L iff lim_{x to c} frac{f(x) - f(c) - L(x-c)}{||x-c||} = 0$$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You could do this. I've seen people do $f'_x$ to refer to the $x$ partial though.
    $endgroup$
    – Alfred Yerger
    Dec 8 '18 at 19:52










  • $begingroup$
    I'm asking why the notation changed when multivariable calculus was created, rather than keeping the old $f'$ notation.
    $endgroup$
    – Stefan
    Dec 8 '18 at 19:54










  • $begingroup$
    The notation didn't necessarily change. $f'$ is Lagrange's notation and $Df$ is Euler's notation. Both of them had notations for multivariate functions, $f^{'}_{''}$ vs $D_{xy}$ for example. I'm not entirely sure if you can pin down a reason why Euler's is more popular for multiple variables, but I can guess that it's just do to clarity. And Lagrange's notation is clearer and more concise for a single variable.
    $endgroup$
    – Dando18
    Dec 8 '18 at 20:01










  • $begingroup$
    I think the main reason is that there's much more complexity in multivariate derivatives. You have total derivatives, partial derivatives, and the Jacobian. Spivak uses prime notation to refer to the Jacobian in "Calculus on Manifolds", so it's not entirely abandoned.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexanderJ93
    Dec 8 '18 at 20:14














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Is there any reason we use $Df$ for derivatives of multivariable functions but $f'$ derivatives of single variable functions despite having a definition that works for both:



$$Df(c) = f'(c) = L iff lim_{x to c} frac{f(x) - f(c) - L(x-c)}{||x-c||} = 0$$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is there any reason we use $Df$ for derivatives of multivariable functions but $f'$ derivatives of single variable functions despite having a definition that works for both:



$$Df(c) = f'(c) = L iff lim_{x to c} frac{f(x) - f(c) - L(x-c)}{||x-c||} = 0$$







derivatives notation math-history






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 8 '18 at 20:04









Rodrigo de Azevedo

13.1k41960




13.1k41960










asked Dec 8 '18 at 19:50









StefanStefan

2126




2126








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You could do this. I've seen people do $f'_x$ to refer to the $x$ partial though.
    $endgroup$
    – Alfred Yerger
    Dec 8 '18 at 19:52










  • $begingroup$
    I'm asking why the notation changed when multivariable calculus was created, rather than keeping the old $f'$ notation.
    $endgroup$
    – Stefan
    Dec 8 '18 at 19:54










  • $begingroup$
    The notation didn't necessarily change. $f'$ is Lagrange's notation and $Df$ is Euler's notation. Both of them had notations for multivariate functions, $f^{'}_{''}$ vs $D_{xy}$ for example. I'm not entirely sure if you can pin down a reason why Euler's is more popular for multiple variables, but I can guess that it's just do to clarity. And Lagrange's notation is clearer and more concise for a single variable.
    $endgroup$
    – Dando18
    Dec 8 '18 at 20:01










  • $begingroup$
    I think the main reason is that there's much more complexity in multivariate derivatives. You have total derivatives, partial derivatives, and the Jacobian. Spivak uses prime notation to refer to the Jacobian in "Calculus on Manifolds", so it's not entirely abandoned.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexanderJ93
    Dec 8 '18 at 20:14














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You could do this. I've seen people do $f'_x$ to refer to the $x$ partial though.
    $endgroup$
    – Alfred Yerger
    Dec 8 '18 at 19:52










  • $begingroup$
    I'm asking why the notation changed when multivariable calculus was created, rather than keeping the old $f'$ notation.
    $endgroup$
    – Stefan
    Dec 8 '18 at 19:54










  • $begingroup$
    The notation didn't necessarily change. $f'$ is Lagrange's notation and $Df$ is Euler's notation. Both of them had notations for multivariate functions, $f^{'}_{''}$ vs $D_{xy}$ for example. I'm not entirely sure if you can pin down a reason why Euler's is more popular for multiple variables, but I can guess that it's just do to clarity. And Lagrange's notation is clearer and more concise for a single variable.
    $endgroup$
    – Dando18
    Dec 8 '18 at 20:01










  • $begingroup$
    I think the main reason is that there's much more complexity in multivariate derivatives. You have total derivatives, partial derivatives, and the Jacobian. Spivak uses prime notation to refer to the Jacobian in "Calculus on Manifolds", so it's not entirely abandoned.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexanderJ93
    Dec 8 '18 at 20:14








2




2




$begingroup$
You could do this. I've seen people do $f'_x$ to refer to the $x$ partial though.
$endgroup$
– Alfred Yerger
Dec 8 '18 at 19:52




$begingroup$
You could do this. I've seen people do $f'_x$ to refer to the $x$ partial though.
$endgroup$
– Alfred Yerger
Dec 8 '18 at 19:52












$begingroup$
I'm asking why the notation changed when multivariable calculus was created, rather than keeping the old $f'$ notation.
$endgroup$
– Stefan
Dec 8 '18 at 19:54




$begingroup$
I'm asking why the notation changed when multivariable calculus was created, rather than keeping the old $f'$ notation.
$endgroup$
– Stefan
Dec 8 '18 at 19:54












$begingroup$
The notation didn't necessarily change. $f'$ is Lagrange's notation and $Df$ is Euler's notation. Both of them had notations for multivariate functions, $f^{'}_{''}$ vs $D_{xy}$ for example. I'm not entirely sure if you can pin down a reason why Euler's is more popular for multiple variables, but I can guess that it's just do to clarity. And Lagrange's notation is clearer and more concise for a single variable.
$endgroup$
– Dando18
Dec 8 '18 at 20:01




$begingroup$
The notation didn't necessarily change. $f'$ is Lagrange's notation and $Df$ is Euler's notation. Both of them had notations for multivariate functions, $f^{'}_{''}$ vs $D_{xy}$ for example. I'm not entirely sure if you can pin down a reason why Euler's is more popular for multiple variables, but I can guess that it's just do to clarity. And Lagrange's notation is clearer and more concise for a single variable.
$endgroup$
– Dando18
Dec 8 '18 at 20:01












$begingroup$
I think the main reason is that there's much more complexity in multivariate derivatives. You have total derivatives, partial derivatives, and the Jacobian. Spivak uses prime notation to refer to the Jacobian in "Calculus on Manifolds", so it's not entirely abandoned.
$endgroup$
– AlexanderJ93
Dec 8 '18 at 20:14




$begingroup$
I think the main reason is that there's much more complexity in multivariate derivatives. You have total derivatives, partial derivatives, and the Jacobian. Spivak uses prime notation to refer to the Jacobian in "Calculus on Manifolds", so it's not entirely abandoned.
$endgroup$
– AlexanderJ93
Dec 8 '18 at 20:14










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031556%2fwhy-do-we-use-df-rather-than-f-for-the-derivative-of-a-multivariable-functi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031556%2fwhy-do-we-use-df-rather-than-f-for-the-derivative-of-a-multivariable-functi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?