Draw an aircraft with Tikz












8















I want to draw a plane using the Tikz tool.
You will find, attached, a screenshot.



enter image description here










share|improve this question




















  • 25





    Please kindly provide a minimal working example to show your effort and to show what your problem is.

    – kiss my armpit
    May 17 '13 at 13:53








  • 10





    Though it might be fun to try, your question sounds like: "Please do this difficult drawing for me for free. Thanks." As @ClickMe says, explaining what you've tried yourself (preferably with some code) would help get past that impression.

    – badroit
    May 17 '13 at 14:00






  • 10





    Friends, please do not downvote this question if the score is already -1.

    – Paulo Cereda
    May 17 '13 at 14:07






  • 14





    The question has received quite some downvotes. We should explain the OP (@physics) why we think that this question is "bad": Drawing such a complex graphics with tikz is a tedious job and it might be done much easier with the right tool. Since we don't know what the purpose is to do that with tikz, nobody will of course spend an hour or two drawing that airplane in tikz. If you (the OP) already have say 90% of the code, our job would easier and we know where the difficulty is.

    – topskip
    May 17 '13 at 14:14






  • 10





    I would just like to note that the TeX Stack Exchange community is one of the best communities I have encountered on the internet so far and that it is a pleasure and an absolute joy to be a part of it (although I am not talking much, I read Q&As every day). I appreciate it! Perhaps beautiful typography is one of the ways to find the best in people. :-)

    – Harold Cavendish
    May 17 '13 at 22:04


















8















I want to draw a plane using the Tikz tool.
You will find, attached, a screenshot.



enter image description here










share|improve this question




















  • 25





    Please kindly provide a minimal working example to show your effort and to show what your problem is.

    – kiss my armpit
    May 17 '13 at 13:53








  • 10





    Though it might be fun to try, your question sounds like: "Please do this difficult drawing for me for free. Thanks." As @ClickMe says, explaining what you've tried yourself (preferably with some code) would help get past that impression.

    – badroit
    May 17 '13 at 14:00






  • 10





    Friends, please do not downvote this question if the score is already -1.

    – Paulo Cereda
    May 17 '13 at 14:07






  • 14





    The question has received quite some downvotes. We should explain the OP (@physics) why we think that this question is "bad": Drawing such a complex graphics with tikz is a tedious job and it might be done much easier with the right tool. Since we don't know what the purpose is to do that with tikz, nobody will of course spend an hour or two drawing that airplane in tikz. If you (the OP) already have say 90% of the code, our job would easier and we know where the difficulty is.

    – topskip
    May 17 '13 at 14:14






  • 10





    I would just like to note that the TeX Stack Exchange community is one of the best communities I have encountered on the internet so far and that it is a pleasure and an absolute joy to be a part of it (although I am not talking much, I read Q&As every day). I appreciate it! Perhaps beautiful typography is one of the ways to find the best in people. :-)

    – Harold Cavendish
    May 17 '13 at 22:04
















8












8








8


10






I want to draw a plane using the Tikz tool.
You will find, attached, a screenshot.



enter image description here










share|improve this question
















I want to draw a plane using the Tikz tool.
You will find, attached, a screenshot.



enter image description here







tikz-pgf 3d technical-drawing






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 18 '13 at 5:26









texenthusiast

5,097323107




5,097323107










asked May 17 '13 at 13:51









physicsphysics

4753714




4753714








  • 25





    Please kindly provide a minimal working example to show your effort and to show what your problem is.

    – kiss my armpit
    May 17 '13 at 13:53








  • 10





    Though it might be fun to try, your question sounds like: "Please do this difficult drawing for me for free. Thanks." As @ClickMe says, explaining what you've tried yourself (preferably with some code) would help get past that impression.

    – badroit
    May 17 '13 at 14:00






  • 10





    Friends, please do not downvote this question if the score is already -1.

    – Paulo Cereda
    May 17 '13 at 14:07






  • 14





    The question has received quite some downvotes. We should explain the OP (@physics) why we think that this question is "bad": Drawing such a complex graphics with tikz is a tedious job and it might be done much easier with the right tool. Since we don't know what the purpose is to do that with tikz, nobody will of course spend an hour or two drawing that airplane in tikz. If you (the OP) already have say 90% of the code, our job would easier and we know where the difficulty is.

    – topskip
    May 17 '13 at 14:14






  • 10





    I would just like to note that the TeX Stack Exchange community is one of the best communities I have encountered on the internet so far and that it is a pleasure and an absolute joy to be a part of it (although I am not talking much, I read Q&As every day). I appreciate it! Perhaps beautiful typography is one of the ways to find the best in people. :-)

    – Harold Cavendish
    May 17 '13 at 22:04
















  • 25





    Please kindly provide a minimal working example to show your effort and to show what your problem is.

    – kiss my armpit
    May 17 '13 at 13:53








  • 10





    Though it might be fun to try, your question sounds like: "Please do this difficult drawing for me for free. Thanks." As @ClickMe says, explaining what you've tried yourself (preferably with some code) would help get past that impression.

    – badroit
    May 17 '13 at 14:00






  • 10





    Friends, please do not downvote this question if the score is already -1.

    – Paulo Cereda
    May 17 '13 at 14:07






  • 14





    The question has received quite some downvotes. We should explain the OP (@physics) why we think that this question is "bad": Drawing such a complex graphics with tikz is a tedious job and it might be done much easier with the right tool. Since we don't know what the purpose is to do that with tikz, nobody will of course spend an hour or two drawing that airplane in tikz. If you (the OP) already have say 90% of the code, our job would easier and we know where the difficulty is.

    – topskip
    May 17 '13 at 14:14






  • 10





    I would just like to note that the TeX Stack Exchange community is one of the best communities I have encountered on the internet so far and that it is a pleasure and an absolute joy to be a part of it (although I am not talking much, I read Q&As every day). I appreciate it! Perhaps beautiful typography is one of the ways to find the best in people. :-)

    – Harold Cavendish
    May 17 '13 at 22:04










25




25





Please kindly provide a minimal working example to show your effort and to show what your problem is.

– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 13:53







Please kindly provide a minimal working example to show your effort and to show what your problem is.

– kiss my armpit
May 17 '13 at 13:53






10




10





Though it might be fun to try, your question sounds like: "Please do this difficult drawing for me for free. Thanks." As @ClickMe says, explaining what you've tried yourself (preferably with some code) would help get past that impression.

– badroit
May 17 '13 at 14:00





Though it might be fun to try, your question sounds like: "Please do this difficult drawing for me for free. Thanks." As @ClickMe says, explaining what you've tried yourself (preferably with some code) would help get past that impression.

– badroit
May 17 '13 at 14:00




10




10





Friends, please do not downvote this question if the score is already -1.

– Paulo Cereda
May 17 '13 at 14:07





Friends, please do not downvote this question if the score is already -1.

– Paulo Cereda
May 17 '13 at 14:07




14




14





The question has received quite some downvotes. We should explain the OP (@physics) why we think that this question is "bad": Drawing such a complex graphics with tikz is a tedious job and it might be done much easier with the right tool. Since we don't know what the purpose is to do that with tikz, nobody will of course spend an hour or two drawing that airplane in tikz. If you (the OP) already have say 90% of the code, our job would easier and we know where the difficulty is.

– topskip
May 17 '13 at 14:14





The question has received quite some downvotes. We should explain the OP (@physics) why we think that this question is "bad": Drawing such a complex graphics with tikz is a tedious job and it might be done much easier with the right tool. Since we don't know what the purpose is to do that with tikz, nobody will of course spend an hour or two drawing that airplane in tikz. If you (the OP) already have say 90% of the code, our job would easier and we know where the difficulty is.

– topskip
May 17 '13 at 14:14




10




10





I would just like to note that the TeX Stack Exchange community is one of the best communities I have encountered on the internet so far and that it is a pleasure and an absolute joy to be a part of it (although I am not talking much, I read Q&As every day). I appreciate it! Perhaps beautiful typography is one of the ways to find the best in people. :-)

– Harold Cavendish
May 17 '13 at 22:04







I would just like to note that the TeX Stack Exchange community is one of the best communities I have encountered on the internet so far and that it is a pleasure and an absolute joy to be a part of it (although I am not talking much, I read Q&As every day). I appreciate it! Perhaps beautiful typography is one of the ways to find the best in people. :-)

– Harold Cavendish
May 17 '13 at 22:04












7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes


















77





+100









It was suggested in chat



http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/9482087#9482087



That picture mode would be the ideal tool for the job here:





documentclass{article}
begin{document}
begin{picture}(200,100)
put(30,40){line(1,0){150}}
put(30,40){line(0,1){60}}
put(30,100){line(1,0){20}}
put(50,100){line(1,-4){10}}
put(60,60){line(1,0){100}}
put(160,60){line(1,-1){20}}
put(100,50){line(0,-1){80}}
put(130,50){line(0,-1){80}}
put(100,-30){line(1,0){30}}
put(100,61){line(0,1){49}}
put(130,61){line(0,1){49}}
put(100,110){line(1,0){30}}
end{picture}
end{document}





share|improve this answer



















  • 26





    Best. Airplane. Ever. :)

    – Paulo Cereda
    May 17 '13 at 22:13











  • @PauloCereda: The tailplane is missing.

    – AlexG
    Jun 26 '14 at 8:02






  • 5





    @AlexG An exercise left for the reader.

    – Sean Allred
    Feb 21 '15 at 16:23






  • 7





    @SeanAllred the fuselage has been aerodynamically tuned to the extent that an additional wing on the tail is not needed in this design.

    – David Carlisle
    Feb 21 '15 at 16:32






  • 1





    It could take somebody a few minutes to realize it is just a drawing, not a real plane. If drawing a plane is an art, you are its Picasso. :)

    – Diaa
    Aug 9 '18 at 16:24



















40














I would politely discourage anyone from drawing extremely technical drawings like this one
using pure LaTeX (TikZ or PStricks). Here I'm actually referencing abstract/non-mathematical drawings, including an airplane with Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines. Why?



Well, there are many other applications that you can use and easily export to a graphics format that can be included into your document using includegraphics from graphicx.



For example, searching the Google Sketchup 3D Warehouse for airplane gives you detailed 3D models of everything from a Boeing:



Boeing



to a paper airplane
(on graphing paper!):



Paper airplane



to a vintage toy wooden airplane:



Vintage toy plane




Another 3D graphic tools, Sketch:3D Scene Description Translator not to be confused with google sketchup draws two- or three-dimensional solid objects and scenes by describing them in a tiny input language. Sketch emits PSTricks or TikZ/PGF code and allows embedding arbitrary LaTeX code for labeling and any other purpose the user can imagine. A novel feature allows LaTeX objects to be positioned with respect to 3d points in the scene. More details have a look at Italian document titled "Illustrazioni tridimensionali A con Sketch/LaTeX/PSTricks/Tikz nella didattica della Dinamica del Volo by A De Marco" at arstexnica no 4, Oct 2007. Some more related examples/hints by author




Figure 8(a) in above article 3D Illustrations using sketch of aircraft:



3D Illustrations using sketch of aircraft



Similarly, OpenClipArt provides SVG images in abundance (sometimes more cartoon-like though), including many for airplanes. These can be converted to TikZ images using Inkscape.



Printing any of these to PDF if no other means exist (again, using free software like PDF Creator print driver
or otherwise) gives you a scalable vector graphics image which you can then use to overlay your annotations using techniques described in Drawing on an image with TikZ.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Werner's picture and Donald E. Knuth's one.

    – kiss my armpit
    May 17 '13 at 23:36






  • 1





    Thanks @Werner for having brought the attention on my paper about Sketch.

    – agodemar
    May 18 '13 at 9:16











  • These are great images from google. How would you include them in your document? After following the link above (for example for the paper airplane) I wind up getting a find in "dae" format. I have not idea what that is. Any suggestions?

    – A.Ellett
    Jun 26 '13 at 22:41











  • @A.Ellett: The images above are from Google Sketchup models. So (and what I typically do) is open up the model in Sketchup and print it to PDF. That transfers the model into a 2D vector graphics that you can "play" with (after playing with it to your liking in Sketchup itself). There is some loss of information (shadows, most notably). However, I'm also using the free version for these "conversions"; Google Sketchup Pro natively exports to PDF and other formats, but I haven't tried it.

    – Werner
    Jun 26 '13 at 22:51



















35














You could start with something like this:



http://github.com/lahvak/TeX-stuff/blob/master/plane.tex



(I tried to include the code here, but it was too large.)



It will produce a picture like this:



Picture of a plane



You can then edit the code, clean it up, shorten it, etc.



Edit: I took the original .png image, deleted some irrelevant parts, and use potrace to get a vectorized version. That step would not be necessary if the original already was in a vector format. Then I use pstoedit to convert it to an editable format. At least the version of pstoedit on my computer does not do conversion to tikz, but metapost uses very similar syntax for path specifications, so I converted to metapost and eddited by hand.



Then I went through the file, adding color attributes to individual path to be able to locate which one is which, and, with a help of an overlayed grid, editted at least some of the paths. The editing could be carried much further, but as an example I feel this is sufficient. It is a tedious process, but IMHO it would be less work than creating the whole drawing from scratch in tikz.



As it is, it really did not take long, I had to interrupt the work several times, but altogether it took perhaps 30 minutes or so.






share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    I'm interested to know how you did this, and perhaps how long it took you. My answer references the fact that non-mathematical yet technical drawings like this is better-suites for other languages. My first instinct is a tracing mechanism that takes (as input) any image and yields (as output) a vectorized version - almost like OCR.

    – Werner
    May 18 '13 at 13:08











  • @Werner I had the same thought hence resisted to post. But nevertheless potrace or autotrace to trace to vector and then inkscape2tikz to spit out TikZ code looks good. This process may need touchup time or more work to be done in TikZ to remove bad conversions.

    – texenthusiast
    May 18 '13 at 19:14











  • @Werner: see the last edit.

    – Jan Hlavacek
    May 18 '13 at 23:11



















25














enter image description here



documentclass[preview,border=12pt]{standalone}
usepackage{bbding,graphicx}
begin{document}
scalebox{10}{Plane}
end{document}


Edit:



Responding to the requested animation:



enter image description here



documentclass[preview,border=12pt,multi]{standalone}
usepackage{bbding,graphicx,multido}
begin{document}
multido{i=10+-1}{10}{previewscalebox{i}{Plane}endpreview}
end{document}


How to enjoy it? Imagine that you are dropped from a plane.






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    No animation ? I'm disappointed ;)

    – Tom Bombadil
    May 17 '13 at 20:50











  • Look to me like the plane … drops.

    – Qrrbrbirlbel
    May 17 '13 at 21:02






  • 11





    @Qrrbrbirlbel: Yes. It is also correct. Motion is relative. I brush my teeth by rotating my head and hold my toothbrush motionless.

    – kiss my armpit
    May 17 '13 at 21:09











  • I wonder why bbding is not part of texlive 2012? ! LaTeX Error: File bbding.sty' not found.` when I do pdflatex on the above code on Linux. pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.4-1.40.13 (TeX Live 2012/Debian)

    – Nasser
    May 17 '13 at 21:22











  • @Nasser: I used TeX Live 2012 that was regularly updated (but before TL got frozen).

    – kiss my armpit
    May 17 '13 at 21:24





















16














An example, from pgfplots gallery:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer































    8














    fontawesome now offers a scalable alternative to the symbol from bbding, offering both an aeroplane symbol proper and two versions of a paper aeroplane.



    awesome aeroplanes



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{fontawesome}
    begin{document}
    faPlane faPaperPlane faPaperPlaneO
    end{document}


    And the font even scales correctly when compiled with pdfTeX. If you have problems with scaling make sure your TeX distribution is current as an earlier version was buggy in a way which affecting scaling with pdfTeX (but not Xe/LuaTeX).






    share|improve this answer































      3














      The next revolution in aviation:



      The duck plane



      documentclass{standalone}

      usepackage{tikzducks}

      begin{document}
      begin{tikzpicture}
      duck

      fill[orange] (0.7331,0.5229) .. controls (1.8688,-0.6326) and (2.2337,0.0383) .. (1.2819,0.7331) -- cycle;

      fill[brown] (1.3848,1.6771) .. controls (1.2665,2.2823) and (0.5559,2.2697) .. (0.4000,1.6455) .. controls (0.5711,1.6714) and (0.8503,1.6562) .. (0.9926,1.6247) .. controls (0.9703,1.4641) and (1.0307,1.0718) .. (1.1444,1.0104) .. controls (1.3485,0.9002) and (1.4461,1.4498) .. (1.3848,1.6771) -- cycle;

      fill[gray] (0.9153,1.4857) -- (0.9472,1.6278) -- (1.3926,1.5288) -- (1.3840,1.4228) -- cycle;
      fill[gray] (0.6484,1.6773) -- (0.6601,1.7155) -- (0.7558,1.6863) -- (0.7441,1.6480) -- cycle;

      draw[gray,fill=black] (0.83,1.57) circle (0.135);
      draw[gray,fill=black] (0.54,1.65) circle (0.12);

      end{tikzpicture}
      end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "85"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f114783%2fdraw-an-aircraft-with-tikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        7 Answers
        7






        active

        oldest

        votes








        7 Answers
        7






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        77





        +100









        It was suggested in chat



        http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/9482087#9482087



        That picture mode would be the ideal tool for the job here:





        documentclass{article}
        begin{document}
        begin{picture}(200,100)
        put(30,40){line(1,0){150}}
        put(30,40){line(0,1){60}}
        put(30,100){line(1,0){20}}
        put(50,100){line(1,-4){10}}
        put(60,60){line(1,0){100}}
        put(160,60){line(1,-1){20}}
        put(100,50){line(0,-1){80}}
        put(130,50){line(0,-1){80}}
        put(100,-30){line(1,0){30}}
        put(100,61){line(0,1){49}}
        put(130,61){line(0,1){49}}
        put(100,110){line(1,0){30}}
        end{picture}
        end{document}





        share|improve this answer



















        • 26





          Best. Airplane. Ever. :)

          – Paulo Cereda
          May 17 '13 at 22:13











        • @PauloCereda: The tailplane is missing.

          – AlexG
          Jun 26 '14 at 8:02






        • 5





          @AlexG An exercise left for the reader.

          – Sean Allred
          Feb 21 '15 at 16:23






        • 7





          @SeanAllred the fuselage has been aerodynamically tuned to the extent that an additional wing on the tail is not needed in this design.

          – David Carlisle
          Feb 21 '15 at 16:32






        • 1





          It could take somebody a few minutes to realize it is just a drawing, not a real plane. If drawing a plane is an art, you are its Picasso. :)

          – Diaa
          Aug 9 '18 at 16:24
















        77





        +100









        It was suggested in chat



        http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/9482087#9482087



        That picture mode would be the ideal tool for the job here:





        documentclass{article}
        begin{document}
        begin{picture}(200,100)
        put(30,40){line(1,0){150}}
        put(30,40){line(0,1){60}}
        put(30,100){line(1,0){20}}
        put(50,100){line(1,-4){10}}
        put(60,60){line(1,0){100}}
        put(160,60){line(1,-1){20}}
        put(100,50){line(0,-1){80}}
        put(130,50){line(0,-1){80}}
        put(100,-30){line(1,0){30}}
        put(100,61){line(0,1){49}}
        put(130,61){line(0,1){49}}
        put(100,110){line(1,0){30}}
        end{picture}
        end{document}





        share|improve this answer



















        • 26





          Best. Airplane. Ever. :)

          – Paulo Cereda
          May 17 '13 at 22:13











        • @PauloCereda: The tailplane is missing.

          – AlexG
          Jun 26 '14 at 8:02






        • 5





          @AlexG An exercise left for the reader.

          – Sean Allred
          Feb 21 '15 at 16:23






        • 7





          @SeanAllred the fuselage has been aerodynamically tuned to the extent that an additional wing on the tail is not needed in this design.

          – David Carlisle
          Feb 21 '15 at 16:32






        • 1





          It could take somebody a few minutes to realize it is just a drawing, not a real plane. If drawing a plane is an art, you are its Picasso. :)

          – Diaa
          Aug 9 '18 at 16:24














        77





        +100







        77





        +100



        77




        +100





        It was suggested in chat



        http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/9482087#9482087



        That picture mode would be the ideal tool for the job here:





        documentclass{article}
        begin{document}
        begin{picture}(200,100)
        put(30,40){line(1,0){150}}
        put(30,40){line(0,1){60}}
        put(30,100){line(1,0){20}}
        put(50,100){line(1,-4){10}}
        put(60,60){line(1,0){100}}
        put(160,60){line(1,-1){20}}
        put(100,50){line(0,-1){80}}
        put(130,50){line(0,-1){80}}
        put(100,-30){line(1,0){30}}
        put(100,61){line(0,1){49}}
        put(130,61){line(0,1){49}}
        put(100,110){line(1,0){30}}
        end{picture}
        end{document}





        share|improve this answer













        It was suggested in chat



        http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/9482087#9482087



        That picture mode would be the ideal tool for the job here:





        documentclass{article}
        begin{document}
        begin{picture}(200,100)
        put(30,40){line(1,0){150}}
        put(30,40){line(0,1){60}}
        put(30,100){line(1,0){20}}
        put(50,100){line(1,-4){10}}
        put(60,60){line(1,0){100}}
        put(160,60){line(1,-1){20}}
        put(100,50){line(0,-1){80}}
        put(130,50){line(0,-1){80}}
        put(100,-30){line(1,0){30}}
        put(100,61){line(0,1){49}}
        put(130,61){line(0,1){49}}
        put(100,110){line(1,0){30}}
        end{picture}
        end{document}






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 17 '13 at 21:33









        David CarlisleDavid Carlisle

        494k4111381886




        494k4111381886








        • 26





          Best. Airplane. Ever. :)

          – Paulo Cereda
          May 17 '13 at 22:13











        • @PauloCereda: The tailplane is missing.

          – AlexG
          Jun 26 '14 at 8:02






        • 5





          @AlexG An exercise left for the reader.

          – Sean Allred
          Feb 21 '15 at 16:23






        • 7





          @SeanAllred the fuselage has been aerodynamically tuned to the extent that an additional wing on the tail is not needed in this design.

          – David Carlisle
          Feb 21 '15 at 16:32






        • 1





          It could take somebody a few minutes to realize it is just a drawing, not a real plane. If drawing a plane is an art, you are its Picasso. :)

          – Diaa
          Aug 9 '18 at 16:24














        • 26





          Best. Airplane. Ever. :)

          – Paulo Cereda
          May 17 '13 at 22:13











        • @PauloCereda: The tailplane is missing.

          – AlexG
          Jun 26 '14 at 8:02






        • 5





          @AlexG An exercise left for the reader.

          – Sean Allred
          Feb 21 '15 at 16:23






        • 7





          @SeanAllred the fuselage has been aerodynamically tuned to the extent that an additional wing on the tail is not needed in this design.

          – David Carlisle
          Feb 21 '15 at 16:32






        • 1





          It could take somebody a few minutes to realize it is just a drawing, not a real plane. If drawing a plane is an art, you are its Picasso. :)

          – Diaa
          Aug 9 '18 at 16:24








        26




        26





        Best. Airplane. Ever. :)

        – Paulo Cereda
        May 17 '13 at 22:13





        Best. Airplane. Ever. :)

        – Paulo Cereda
        May 17 '13 at 22:13













        @PauloCereda: The tailplane is missing.

        – AlexG
        Jun 26 '14 at 8:02





        @PauloCereda: The tailplane is missing.

        – AlexG
        Jun 26 '14 at 8:02




        5




        5





        @AlexG An exercise left for the reader.

        – Sean Allred
        Feb 21 '15 at 16:23





        @AlexG An exercise left for the reader.

        – Sean Allred
        Feb 21 '15 at 16:23




        7




        7





        @SeanAllred the fuselage has been aerodynamically tuned to the extent that an additional wing on the tail is not needed in this design.

        – David Carlisle
        Feb 21 '15 at 16:32





        @SeanAllred the fuselage has been aerodynamically tuned to the extent that an additional wing on the tail is not needed in this design.

        – David Carlisle
        Feb 21 '15 at 16:32




        1




        1





        It could take somebody a few minutes to realize it is just a drawing, not a real plane. If drawing a plane is an art, you are its Picasso. :)

        – Diaa
        Aug 9 '18 at 16:24





        It could take somebody a few minutes to realize it is just a drawing, not a real plane. If drawing a plane is an art, you are its Picasso. :)

        – Diaa
        Aug 9 '18 at 16:24











        40














        I would politely discourage anyone from drawing extremely technical drawings like this one
        using pure LaTeX (TikZ or PStricks). Here I'm actually referencing abstract/non-mathematical drawings, including an airplane with Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines. Why?



        Well, there are many other applications that you can use and easily export to a graphics format that can be included into your document using includegraphics from graphicx.



        For example, searching the Google Sketchup 3D Warehouse for airplane gives you detailed 3D models of everything from a Boeing:



        Boeing



        to a paper airplane
        (on graphing paper!):



        Paper airplane



        to a vintage toy wooden airplane:



        Vintage toy plane




        Another 3D graphic tools, Sketch:3D Scene Description Translator not to be confused with google sketchup draws two- or three-dimensional solid objects and scenes by describing them in a tiny input language. Sketch emits PSTricks or TikZ/PGF code and allows embedding arbitrary LaTeX code for labeling and any other purpose the user can imagine. A novel feature allows LaTeX objects to be positioned with respect to 3d points in the scene. More details have a look at Italian document titled "Illustrazioni tridimensionali A con Sketch/LaTeX/PSTricks/Tikz nella didattica della Dinamica del Volo by A De Marco" at arstexnica no 4, Oct 2007. Some more related examples/hints by author




        Figure 8(a) in above article 3D Illustrations using sketch of aircraft:



        3D Illustrations using sketch of aircraft



        Similarly, OpenClipArt provides SVG images in abundance (sometimes more cartoon-like though), including many for airplanes. These can be converted to TikZ images using Inkscape.



        Printing any of these to PDF if no other means exist (again, using free software like PDF Creator print driver
        or otherwise) gives you a scalable vector graphics image which you can then use to overlay your annotations using techniques described in Drawing on an image with TikZ.






        share|improve this answer





















        • 1





          Werner's picture and Donald E. Knuth's one.

          – kiss my armpit
          May 17 '13 at 23:36






        • 1





          Thanks @Werner for having brought the attention on my paper about Sketch.

          – agodemar
          May 18 '13 at 9:16











        • These are great images from google. How would you include them in your document? After following the link above (for example for the paper airplane) I wind up getting a find in "dae" format. I have not idea what that is. Any suggestions?

          – A.Ellett
          Jun 26 '13 at 22:41











        • @A.Ellett: The images above are from Google Sketchup models. So (and what I typically do) is open up the model in Sketchup and print it to PDF. That transfers the model into a 2D vector graphics that you can "play" with (after playing with it to your liking in Sketchup itself). There is some loss of information (shadows, most notably). However, I'm also using the free version for these "conversions"; Google Sketchup Pro natively exports to PDF and other formats, but I haven't tried it.

          – Werner
          Jun 26 '13 at 22:51
















        40














        I would politely discourage anyone from drawing extremely technical drawings like this one
        using pure LaTeX (TikZ or PStricks). Here I'm actually referencing abstract/non-mathematical drawings, including an airplane with Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines. Why?



        Well, there are many other applications that you can use and easily export to a graphics format that can be included into your document using includegraphics from graphicx.



        For example, searching the Google Sketchup 3D Warehouse for airplane gives you detailed 3D models of everything from a Boeing:



        Boeing



        to a paper airplane
        (on graphing paper!):



        Paper airplane



        to a vintage toy wooden airplane:



        Vintage toy plane




        Another 3D graphic tools, Sketch:3D Scene Description Translator not to be confused with google sketchup draws two- or three-dimensional solid objects and scenes by describing them in a tiny input language. Sketch emits PSTricks or TikZ/PGF code and allows embedding arbitrary LaTeX code for labeling and any other purpose the user can imagine. A novel feature allows LaTeX objects to be positioned with respect to 3d points in the scene. More details have a look at Italian document titled "Illustrazioni tridimensionali A con Sketch/LaTeX/PSTricks/Tikz nella didattica della Dinamica del Volo by A De Marco" at arstexnica no 4, Oct 2007. Some more related examples/hints by author




        Figure 8(a) in above article 3D Illustrations using sketch of aircraft:



        3D Illustrations using sketch of aircraft



        Similarly, OpenClipArt provides SVG images in abundance (sometimes more cartoon-like though), including many for airplanes. These can be converted to TikZ images using Inkscape.



        Printing any of these to PDF if no other means exist (again, using free software like PDF Creator print driver
        or otherwise) gives you a scalable vector graphics image which you can then use to overlay your annotations using techniques described in Drawing on an image with TikZ.






        share|improve this answer





















        • 1





          Werner's picture and Donald E. Knuth's one.

          – kiss my armpit
          May 17 '13 at 23:36






        • 1





          Thanks @Werner for having brought the attention on my paper about Sketch.

          – agodemar
          May 18 '13 at 9:16











        • These are great images from google. How would you include them in your document? After following the link above (for example for the paper airplane) I wind up getting a find in "dae" format. I have not idea what that is. Any suggestions?

          – A.Ellett
          Jun 26 '13 at 22:41











        • @A.Ellett: The images above are from Google Sketchup models. So (and what I typically do) is open up the model in Sketchup and print it to PDF. That transfers the model into a 2D vector graphics that you can "play" with (after playing with it to your liking in Sketchup itself). There is some loss of information (shadows, most notably). However, I'm also using the free version for these "conversions"; Google Sketchup Pro natively exports to PDF and other formats, but I haven't tried it.

          – Werner
          Jun 26 '13 at 22:51














        40












        40








        40







        I would politely discourage anyone from drawing extremely technical drawings like this one
        using pure LaTeX (TikZ or PStricks). Here I'm actually referencing abstract/non-mathematical drawings, including an airplane with Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines. Why?



        Well, there are many other applications that you can use and easily export to a graphics format that can be included into your document using includegraphics from graphicx.



        For example, searching the Google Sketchup 3D Warehouse for airplane gives you detailed 3D models of everything from a Boeing:



        Boeing



        to a paper airplane
        (on graphing paper!):



        Paper airplane



        to a vintage toy wooden airplane:



        Vintage toy plane




        Another 3D graphic tools, Sketch:3D Scene Description Translator not to be confused with google sketchup draws two- or three-dimensional solid objects and scenes by describing them in a tiny input language. Sketch emits PSTricks or TikZ/PGF code and allows embedding arbitrary LaTeX code for labeling and any other purpose the user can imagine. A novel feature allows LaTeX objects to be positioned with respect to 3d points in the scene. More details have a look at Italian document titled "Illustrazioni tridimensionali A con Sketch/LaTeX/PSTricks/Tikz nella didattica della Dinamica del Volo by A De Marco" at arstexnica no 4, Oct 2007. Some more related examples/hints by author




        Figure 8(a) in above article 3D Illustrations using sketch of aircraft:



        3D Illustrations using sketch of aircraft



        Similarly, OpenClipArt provides SVG images in abundance (sometimes more cartoon-like though), including many for airplanes. These can be converted to TikZ images using Inkscape.



        Printing any of these to PDF if no other means exist (again, using free software like PDF Creator print driver
        or otherwise) gives you a scalable vector graphics image which you can then use to overlay your annotations using techniques described in Drawing on an image with TikZ.






        share|improve this answer















        I would politely discourage anyone from drawing extremely technical drawings like this one
        using pure LaTeX (TikZ or PStricks). Here I'm actually referencing abstract/non-mathematical drawings, including an airplane with Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines. Why?



        Well, there are many other applications that you can use and easily export to a graphics format that can be included into your document using includegraphics from graphicx.



        For example, searching the Google Sketchup 3D Warehouse for airplane gives you detailed 3D models of everything from a Boeing:



        Boeing



        to a paper airplane
        (on graphing paper!):



        Paper airplane



        to a vintage toy wooden airplane:



        Vintage toy plane




        Another 3D graphic tools, Sketch:3D Scene Description Translator not to be confused with google sketchup draws two- or three-dimensional solid objects and scenes by describing them in a tiny input language. Sketch emits PSTricks or TikZ/PGF code and allows embedding arbitrary LaTeX code for labeling and any other purpose the user can imagine. A novel feature allows LaTeX objects to be positioned with respect to 3d points in the scene. More details have a look at Italian document titled "Illustrazioni tridimensionali A con Sketch/LaTeX/PSTricks/Tikz nella didattica della Dinamica del Volo by A De Marco" at arstexnica no 4, Oct 2007. Some more related examples/hints by author




        Figure 8(a) in above article 3D Illustrations using sketch of aircraft:



        3D Illustrations using sketch of aircraft



        Similarly, OpenClipArt provides SVG images in abundance (sometimes more cartoon-like though), including many for airplanes. These can be converted to TikZ images using Inkscape.



        Printing any of these to PDF if no other means exist (again, using free software like PDF Creator print driver
        or otherwise) gives you a scalable vector graphics image which you can then use to overlay your annotations using techniques described in Drawing on an image with TikZ.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:35


























        community wiki





        5 revs, 2 users 89%
        Werner









        • 1





          Werner's picture and Donald E. Knuth's one.

          – kiss my armpit
          May 17 '13 at 23:36






        • 1





          Thanks @Werner for having brought the attention on my paper about Sketch.

          – agodemar
          May 18 '13 at 9:16











        • These are great images from google. How would you include them in your document? After following the link above (for example for the paper airplane) I wind up getting a find in "dae" format. I have not idea what that is. Any suggestions?

          – A.Ellett
          Jun 26 '13 at 22:41











        • @A.Ellett: The images above are from Google Sketchup models. So (and what I typically do) is open up the model in Sketchup and print it to PDF. That transfers the model into a 2D vector graphics that you can "play" with (after playing with it to your liking in Sketchup itself). There is some loss of information (shadows, most notably). However, I'm also using the free version for these "conversions"; Google Sketchup Pro natively exports to PDF and other formats, but I haven't tried it.

          – Werner
          Jun 26 '13 at 22:51














        • 1





          Werner's picture and Donald E. Knuth's one.

          – kiss my armpit
          May 17 '13 at 23:36






        • 1





          Thanks @Werner for having brought the attention on my paper about Sketch.

          – agodemar
          May 18 '13 at 9:16











        • These are great images from google. How would you include them in your document? After following the link above (for example for the paper airplane) I wind up getting a find in "dae" format. I have not idea what that is. Any suggestions?

          – A.Ellett
          Jun 26 '13 at 22:41











        • @A.Ellett: The images above are from Google Sketchup models. So (and what I typically do) is open up the model in Sketchup and print it to PDF. That transfers the model into a 2D vector graphics that you can "play" with (after playing with it to your liking in Sketchup itself). There is some loss of information (shadows, most notably). However, I'm also using the free version for these "conversions"; Google Sketchup Pro natively exports to PDF and other formats, but I haven't tried it.

          – Werner
          Jun 26 '13 at 22:51








        1




        1





        Werner's picture and Donald E. Knuth's one.

        – kiss my armpit
        May 17 '13 at 23:36





        Werner's picture and Donald E. Knuth's one.

        – kiss my armpit
        May 17 '13 at 23:36




        1




        1





        Thanks @Werner for having brought the attention on my paper about Sketch.

        – agodemar
        May 18 '13 at 9:16





        Thanks @Werner for having brought the attention on my paper about Sketch.

        – agodemar
        May 18 '13 at 9:16













        These are great images from google. How would you include them in your document? After following the link above (for example for the paper airplane) I wind up getting a find in "dae" format. I have not idea what that is. Any suggestions?

        – A.Ellett
        Jun 26 '13 at 22:41





        These are great images from google. How would you include them in your document? After following the link above (for example for the paper airplane) I wind up getting a find in "dae" format. I have not idea what that is. Any suggestions?

        – A.Ellett
        Jun 26 '13 at 22:41













        @A.Ellett: The images above are from Google Sketchup models. So (and what I typically do) is open up the model in Sketchup and print it to PDF. That transfers the model into a 2D vector graphics that you can "play" with (after playing with it to your liking in Sketchup itself). There is some loss of information (shadows, most notably). However, I'm also using the free version for these "conversions"; Google Sketchup Pro natively exports to PDF and other formats, but I haven't tried it.

        – Werner
        Jun 26 '13 at 22:51





        @A.Ellett: The images above are from Google Sketchup models. So (and what I typically do) is open up the model in Sketchup and print it to PDF. That transfers the model into a 2D vector graphics that you can "play" with (after playing with it to your liking in Sketchup itself). There is some loss of information (shadows, most notably). However, I'm also using the free version for these "conversions"; Google Sketchup Pro natively exports to PDF and other formats, but I haven't tried it.

        – Werner
        Jun 26 '13 at 22:51











        35














        You could start with something like this:



        http://github.com/lahvak/TeX-stuff/blob/master/plane.tex



        (I tried to include the code here, but it was too large.)



        It will produce a picture like this:



        Picture of a plane



        You can then edit the code, clean it up, shorten it, etc.



        Edit: I took the original .png image, deleted some irrelevant parts, and use potrace to get a vectorized version. That step would not be necessary if the original already was in a vector format. Then I use pstoedit to convert it to an editable format. At least the version of pstoedit on my computer does not do conversion to tikz, but metapost uses very similar syntax for path specifications, so I converted to metapost and eddited by hand.



        Then I went through the file, adding color attributes to individual path to be able to locate which one is which, and, with a help of an overlayed grid, editted at least some of the paths. The editing could be carried much further, but as an example I feel this is sufficient. It is a tedious process, but IMHO it would be less work than creating the whole drawing from scratch in tikz.



        As it is, it really did not take long, I had to interrupt the work several times, but altogether it took perhaps 30 minutes or so.






        share|improve this answer





















        • 2





          I'm interested to know how you did this, and perhaps how long it took you. My answer references the fact that non-mathematical yet technical drawings like this is better-suites for other languages. My first instinct is a tracing mechanism that takes (as input) any image and yields (as output) a vectorized version - almost like OCR.

          – Werner
          May 18 '13 at 13:08











        • @Werner I had the same thought hence resisted to post. But nevertheless potrace or autotrace to trace to vector and then inkscape2tikz to spit out TikZ code looks good. This process may need touchup time or more work to be done in TikZ to remove bad conversions.

          – texenthusiast
          May 18 '13 at 19:14











        • @Werner: see the last edit.

          – Jan Hlavacek
          May 18 '13 at 23:11
















        35














        You could start with something like this:



        http://github.com/lahvak/TeX-stuff/blob/master/plane.tex



        (I tried to include the code here, but it was too large.)



        It will produce a picture like this:



        Picture of a plane



        You can then edit the code, clean it up, shorten it, etc.



        Edit: I took the original .png image, deleted some irrelevant parts, and use potrace to get a vectorized version. That step would not be necessary if the original already was in a vector format. Then I use pstoedit to convert it to an editable format. At least the version of pstoedit on my computer does not do conversion to tikz, but metapost uses very similar syntax for path specifications, so I converted to metapost and eddited by hand.



        Then I went through the file, adding color attributes to individual path to be able to locate which one is which, and, with a help of an overlayed grid, editted at least some of the paths. The editing could be carried much further, but as an example I feel this is sufficient. It is a tedious process, but IMHO it would be less work than creating the whole drawing from scratch in tikz.



        As it is, it really did not take long, I had to interrupt the work several times, but altogether it took perhaps 30 minutes or so.






        share|improve this answer





















        • 2





          I'm interested to know how you did this, and perhaps how long it took you. My answer references the fact that non-mathematical yet technical drawings like this is better-suites for other languages. My first instinct is a tracing mechanism that takes (as input) any image and yields (as output) a vectorized version - almost like OCR.

          – Werner
          May 18 '13 at 13:08











        • @Werner I had the same thought hence resisted to post. But nevertheless potrace or autotrace to trace to vector and then inkscape2tikz to spit out TikZ code looks good. This process may need touchup time or more work to be done in TikZ to remove bad conversions.

          – texenthusiast
          May 18 '13 at 19:14











        • @Werner: see the last edit.

          – Jan Hlavacek
          May 18 '13 at 23:11














        35












        35








        35







        You could start with something like this:



        http://github.com/lahvak/TeX-stuff/blob/master/plane.tex



        (I tried to include the code here, but it was too large.)



        It will produce a picture like this:



        Picture of a plane



        You can then edit the code, clean it up, shorten it, etc.



        Edit: I took the original .png image, deleted some irrelevant parts, and use potrace to get a vectorized version. That step would not be necessary if the original already was in a vector format. Then I use pstoedit to convert it to an editable format. At least the version of pstoedit on my computer does not do conversion to tikz, but metapost uses very similar syntax for path specifications, so I converted to metapost and eddited by hand.



        Then I went through the file, adding color attributes to individual path to be able to locate which one is which, and, with a help of an overlayed grid, editted at least some of the paths. The editing could be carried much further, but as an example I feel this is sufficient. It is a tedious process, but IMHO it would be less work than creating the whole drawing from scratch in tikz.



        As it is, it really did not take long, I had to interrupt the work several times, but altogether it took perhaps 30 minutes or so.






        share|improve this answer















        You could start with something like this:



        http://github.com/lahvak/TeX-stuff/blob/master/plane.tex



        (I tried to include the code here, but it was too large.)



        It will produce a picture like this:



        Picture of a plane



        You can then edit the code, clean it up, shorten it, etc.



        Edit: I took the original .png image, deleted some irrelevant parts, and use potrace to get a vectorized version. That step would not be necessary if the original already was in a vector format. Then I use pstoedit to convert it to an editable format. At least the version of pstoedit on my computer does not do conversion to tikz, but metapost uses very similar syntax for path specifications, so I converted to metapost and eddited by hand.



        Then I went through the file, adding color attributes to individual path to be able to locate which one is which, and, with a help of an overlayed grid, editted at least some of the paths. The editing could be carried much further, but as an example I feel this is sufficient. It is a tedious process, but IMHO it would be less work than creating the whole drawing from scratch in tikz.



        As it is, it really did not take long, I had to interrupt the work several times, but altogether it took perhaps 30 minutes or so.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited May 18 '13 at 23:10

























        answered May 18 '13 at 6:02









        Jan HlavacekJan Hlavacek

        15.8k34776




        15.8k34776








        • 2





          I'm interested to know how you did this, and perhaps how long it took you. My answer references the fact that non-mathematical yet technical drawings like this is better-suites for other languages. My first instinct is a tracing mechanism that takes (as input) any image and yields (as output) a vectorized version - almost like OCR.

          – Werner
          May 18 '13 at 13:08











        • @Werner I had the same thought hence resisted to post. But nevertheless potrace or autotrace to trace to vector and then inkscape2tikz to spit out TikZ code looks good. This process may need touchup time or more work to be done in TikZ to remove bad conversions.

          – texenthusiast
          May 18 '13 at 19:14











        • @Werner: see the last edit.

          – Jan Hlavacek
          May 18 '13 at 23:11














        • 2





          I'm interested to know how you did this, and perhaps how long it took you. My answer references the fact that non-mathematical yet technical drawings like this is better-suites for other languages. My first instinct is a tracing mechanism that takes (as input) any image and yields (as output) a vectorized version - almost like OCR.

          – Werner
          May 18 '13 at 13:08











        • @Werner I had the same thought hence resisted to post. But nevertheless potrace or autotrace to trace to vector and then inkscape2tikz to spit out TikZ code looks good. This process may need touchup time or more work to be done in TikZ to remove bad conversions.

          – texenthusiast
          May 18 '13 at 19:14











        • @Werner: see the last edit.

          – Jan Hlavacek
          May 18 '13 at 23:11








        2




        2





        I'm interested to know how you did this, and perhaps how long it took you. My answer references the fact that non-mathematical yet technical drawings like this is better-suites for other languages. My first instinct is a tracing mechanism that takes (as input) any image and yields (as output) a vectorized version - almost like OCR.

        – Werner
        May 18 '13 at 13:08





        I'm interested to know how you did this, and perhaps how long it took you. My answer references the fact that non-mathematical yet technical drawings like this is better-suites for other languages. My first instinct is a tracing mechanism that takes (as input) any image and yields (as output) a vectorized version - almost like OCR.

        – Werner
        May 18 '13 at 13:08













        @Werner I had the same thought hence resisted to post. But nevertheless potrace or autotrace to trace to vector and then inkscape2tikz to spit out TikZ code looks good. This process may need touchup time or more work to be done in TikZ to remove bad conversions.

        – texenthusiast
        May 18 '13 at 19:14





        @Werner I had the same thought hence resisted to post. But nevertheless potrace or autotrace to trace to vector and then inkscape2tikz to spit out TikZ code looks good. This process may need touchup time or more work to be done in TikZ to remove bad conversions.

        – texenthusiast
        May 18 '13 at 19:14













        @Werner: see the last edit.

        – Jan Hlavacek
        May 18 '13 at 23:11





        @Werner: see the last edit.

        – Jan Hlavacek
        May 18 '13 at 23:11











        25














        enter image description here



        documentclass[preview,border=12pt]{standalone}
        usepackage{bbding,graphicx}
        begin{document}
        scalebox{10}{Plane}
        end{document}


        Edit:



        Responding to the requested animation:



        enter image description here



        documentclass[preview,border=12pt,multi]{standalone}
        usepackage{bbding,graphicx,multido}
        begin{document}
        multido{i=10+-1}{10}{previewscalebox{i}{Plane}endpreview}
        end{document}


        How to enjoy it? Imagine that you are dropped from a plane.






        share|improve this answer





















        • 3





          No animation ? I'm disappointed ;)

          – Tom Bombadil
          May 17 '13 at 20:50











        • Look to me like the plane … drops.

          – Qrrbrbirlbel
          May 17 '13 at 21:02






        • 11





          @Qrrbrbirlbel: Yes. It is also correct. Motion is relative. I brush my teeth by rotating my head and hold my toothbrush motionless.

          – kiss my armpit
          May 17 '13 at 21:09











        • I wonder why bbding is not part of texlive 2012? ! LaTeX Error: File bbding.sty' not found.` when I do pdflatex on the above code on Linux. pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.4-1.40.13 (TeX Live 2012/Debian)

          – Nasser
          May 17 '13 at 21:22











        • @Nasser: I used TeX Live 2012 that was regularly updated (but before TL got frozen).

          – kiss my armpit
          May 17 '13 at 21:24


















        25














        enter image description here



        documentclass[preview,border=12pt]{standalone}
        usepackage{bbding,graphicx}
        begin{document}
        scalebox{10}{Plane}
        end{document}


        Edit:



        Responding to the requested animation:



        enter image description here



        documentclass[preview,border=12pt,multi]{standalone}
        usepackage{bbding,graphicx,multido}
        begin{document}
        multido{i=10+-1}{10}{previewscalebox{i}{Plane}endpreview}
        end{document}


        How to enjoy it? Imagine that you are dropped from a plane.






        share|improve this answer





















        • 3





          No animation ? I'm disappointed ;)

          – Tom Bombadil
          May 17 '13 at 20:50











        • Look to me like the plane … drops.

          – Qrrbrbirlbel
          May 17 '13 at 21:02






        • 11





          @Qrrbrbirlbel: Yes. It is also correct. Motion is relative. I brush my teeth by rotating my head and hold my toothbrush motionless.

          – kiss my armpit
          May 17 '13 at 21:09











        • I wonder why bbding is not part of texlive 2012? ! LaTeX Error: File bbding.sty' not found.` when I do pdflatex on the above code on Linux. pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.4-1.40.13 (TeX Live 2012/Debian)

          – Nasser
          May 17 '13 at 21:22











        • @Nasser: I used TeX Live 2012 that was regularly updated (but before TL got frozen).

          – kiss my armpit
          May 17 '13 at 21:24
















        25












        25








        25







        enter image description here



        documentclass[preview,border=12pt]{standalone}
        usepackage{bbding,graphicx}
        begin{document}
        scalebox{10}{Plane}
        end{document}


        Edit:



        Responding to the requested animation:



        enter image description here



        documentclass[preview,border=12pt,multi]{standalone}
        usepackage{bbding,graphicx,multido}
        begin{document}
        multido{i=10+-1}{10}{previewscalebox{i}{Plane}endpreview}
        end{document}


        How to enjoy it? Imagine that you are dropped from a plane.






        share|improve this answer















        enter image description here



        documentclass[preview,border=12pt]{standalone}
        usepackage{bbding,graphicx}
        begin{document}
        scalebox{10}{Plane}
        end{document}


        Edit:



        Responding to the requested animation:



        enter image description here



        documentclass[preview,border=12pt,multi]{standalone}
        usepackage{bbding,graphicx,multido}
        begin{document}
        multido{i=10+-1}{10}{previewscalebox{i}{Plane}endpreview}
        end{document}


        How to enjoy it? Imagine that you are dropped from a plane.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited May 17 '13 at 21:00

























        answered May 17 '13 at 20:49









        kiss my armpitkiss my armpit

        13.2k20174406




        13.2k20174406








        • 3





          No animation ? I'm disappointed ;)

          – Tom Bombadil
          May 17 '13 at 20:50











        • Look to me like the plane … drops.

          – Qrrbrbirlbel
          May 17 '13 at 21:02






        • 11





          @Qrrbrbirlbel: Yes. It is also correct. Motion is relative. I brush my teeth by rotating my head and hold my toothbrush motionless.

          – kiss my armpit
          May 17 '13 at 21:09











        • I wonder why bbding is not part of texlive 2012? ! LaTeX Error: File bbding.sty' not found.` when I do pdflatex on the above code on Linux. pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.4-1.40.13 (TeX Live 2012/Debian)

          – Nasser
          May 17 '13 at 21:22











        • @Nasser: I used TeX Live 2012 that was regularly updated (but before TL got frozen).

          – kiss my armpit
          May 17 '13 at 21:24
















        • 3





          No animation ? I'm disappointed ;)

          – Tom Bombadil
          May 17 '13 at 20:50











        • Look to me like the plane … drops.

          – Qrrbrbirlbel
          May 17 '13 at 21:02






        • 11





          @Qrrbrbirlbel: Yes. It is also correct. Motion is relative. I brush my teeth by rotating my head and hold my toothbrush motionless.

          – kiss my armpit
          May 17 '13 at 21:09











        • I wonder why bbding is not part of texlive 2012? ! LaTeX Error: File bbding.sty' not found.` when I do pdflatex on the above code on Linux. pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.4-1.40.13 (TeX Live 2012/Debian)

          – Nasser
          May 17 '13 at 21:22











        • @Nasser: I used TeX Live 2012 that was regularly updated (but before TL got frozen).

          – kiss my armpit
          May 17 '13 at 21:24










        3




        3





        No animation ? I'm disappointed ;)

        – Tom Bombadil
        May 17 '13 at 20:50





        No animation ? I'm disappointed ;)

        – Tom Bombadil
        May 17 '13 at 20:50













        Look to me like the plane … drops.

        – Qrrbrbirlbel
        May 17 '13 at 21:02





        Look to me like the plane … drops.

        – Qrrbrbirlbel
        May 17 '13 at 21:02




        11




        11





        @Qrrbrbirlbel: Yes. It is also correct. Motion is relative. I brush my teeth by rotating my head and hold my toothbrush motionless.

        – kiss my armpit
        May 17 '13 at 21:09





        @Qrrbrbirlbel: Yes. It is also correct. Motion is relative. I brush my teeth by rotating my head and hold my toothbrush motionless.

        – kiss my armpit
        May 17 '13 at 21:09













        I wonder why bbding is not part of texlive 2012? ! LaTeX Error: File bbding.sty' not found.` when I do pdflatex on the above code on Linux. pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.4-1.40.13 (TeX Live 2012/Debian)

        – Nasser
        May 17 '13 at 21:22





        I wonder why bbding is not part of texlive 2012? ! LaTeX Error: File bbding.sty' not found.` when I do pdflatex on the above code on Linux. pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.4-1.40.13 (TeX Live 2012/Debian)

        – Nasser
        May 17 '13 at 21:22













        @Nasser: I used TeX Live 2012 that was regularly updated (but before TL got frozen).

        – kiss my armpit
        May 17 '13 at 21:24







        @Nasser: I used TeX Live 2012 that was regularly updated (but before TL got frozen).

        – kiss my armpit
        May 17 '13 at 21:24













        16














        An example, from pgfplots gallery:



        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer




























          16














          An example, from pgfplots gallery:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























            16












            16








            16







            An example, from pgfplots gallery:



            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer













            An example, from pgfplots gallery:



            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered May 18 '13 at 18:14







            user13907






























                8














                fontawesome now offers a scalable alternative to the symbol from bbding, offering both an aeroplane symbol proper and two versions of a paper aeroplane.



                awesome aeroplanes



                documentclass{article}
                usepackage{fontawesome}
                begin{document}
                faPlane faPaperPlane faPaperPlaneO
                end{document}


                And the font even scales correctly when compiled with pdfTeX. If you have problems with scaling make sure your TeX distribution is current as an earlier version was buggy in a way which affecting scaling with pdfTeX (but not Xe/LuaTeX).






                share|improve this answer




























                  8














                  fontawesome now offers a scalable alternative to the symbol from bbding, offering both an aeroplane symbol proper and two versions of a paper aeroplane.



                  awesome aeroplanes



                  documentclass{article}
                  usepackage{fontawesome}
                  begin{document}
                  faPlane faPaperPlane faPaperPlaneO
                  end{document}


                  And the font even scales correctly when compiled with pdfTeX. If you have problems with scaling make sure your TeX distribution is current as an earlier version was buggy in a way which affecting scaling with pdfTeX (but not Xe/LuaTeX).






                  share|improve this answer


























                    8












                    8








                    8







                    fontawesome now offers a scalable alternative to the symbol from bbding, offering both an aeroplane symbol proper and two versions of a paper aeroplane.



                    awesome aeroplanes



                    documentclass{article}
                    usepackage{fontawesome}
                    begin{document}
                    faPlane faPaperPlane faPaperPlaneO
                    end{document}


                    And the font even scales correctly when compiled with pdfTeX. If you have problems with scaling make sure your TeX distribution is current as an earlier version was buggy in a way which affecting scaling with pdfTeX (but not Xe/LuaTeX).






                    share|improve this answer













                    fontawesome now offers a scalable alternative to the symbol from bbding, offering both an aeroplane symbol proper and two versions of a paper aeroplane.



                    awesome aeroplanes



                    documentclass{article}
                    usepackage{fontawesome}
                    begin{document}
                    faPlane faPaperPlane faPaperPlaneO
                    end{document}


                    And the font even scales correctly when compiled with pdfTeX. If you have problems with scaling make sure your TeX distribution is current as an earlier version was buggy in a way which affecting scaling with pdfTeX (but not Xe/LuaTeX).







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Jan 15 '16 at 2:51









                    cfrcfr

                    158k8191390




                    158k8191390























                        3














                        The next revolution in aviation:



                        The duck plane



                        documentclass{standalone}

                        usepackage{tikzducks}

                        begin{document}
                        begin{tikzpicture}
                        duck

                        fill[orange] (0.7331,0.5229) .. controls (1.8688,-0.6326) and (2.2337,0.0383) .. (1.2819,0.7331) -- cycle;

                        fill[brown] (1.3848,1.6771) .. controls (1.2665,2.2823) and (0.5559,2.2697) .. (0.4000,1.6455) .. controls (0.5711,1.6714) and (0.8503,1.6562) .. (0.9926,1.6247) .. controls (0.9703,1.4641) and (1.0307,1.0718) .. (1.1444,1.0104) .. controls (1.3485,0.9002) and (1.4461,1.4498) .. (1.3848,1.6771) -- cycle;

                        fill[gray] (0.9153,1.4857) -- (0.9472,1.6278) -- (1.3926,1.5288) -- (1.3840,1.4228) -- cycle;
                        fill[gray] (0.6484,1.6773) -- (0.6601,1.7155) -- (0.7558,1.6863) -- (0.7441,1.6480) -- cycle;

                        draw[gray,fill=black] (0.83,1.57) circle (0.135);
                        draw[gray,fill=black] (0.54,1.65) circle (0.12);

                        end{tikzpicture}
                        end{document}


                        enter image description here






                        share|improve this answer




























                          3














                          The next revolution in aviation:



                          The duck plane



                          documentclass{standalone}

                          usepackage{tikzducks}

                          begin{document}
                          begin{tikzpicture}
                          duck

                          fill[orange] (0.7331,0.5229) .. controls (1.8688,-0.6326) and (2.2337,0.0383) .. (1.2819,0.7331) -- cycle;

                          fill[brown] (1.3848,1.6771) .. controls (1.2665,2.2823) and (0.5559,2.2697) .. (0.4000,1.6455) .. controls (0.5711,1.6714) and (0.8503,1.6562) .. (0.9926,1.6247) .. controls (0.9703,1.4641) and (1.0307,1.0718) .. (1.1444,1.0104) .. controls (1.3485,0.9002) and (1.4461,1.4498) .. (1.3848,1.6771) -- cycle;

                          fill[gray] (0.9153,1.4857) -- (0.9472,1.6278) -- (1.3926,1.5288) -- (1.3840,1.4228) -- cycle;
                          fill[gray] (0.6484,1.6773) -- (0.6601,1.7155) -- (0.7558,1.6863) -- (0.7441,1.6480) -- cycle;

                          draw[gray,fill=black] (0.83,1.57) circle (0.135);
                          draw[gray,fill=black] (0.54,1.65) circle (0.12);

                          end{tikzpicture}
                          end{document}


                          enter image description here






                          share|improve this answer


























                            3












                            3








                            3







                            The next revolution in aviation:



                            The duck plane



                            documentclass{standalone}

                            usepackage{tikzducks}

                            begin{document}
                            begin{tikzpicture}
                            duck

                            fill[orange] (0.7331,0.5229) .. controls (1.8688,-0.6326) and (2.2337,0.0383) .. (1.2819,0.7331) -- cycle;

                            fill[brown] (1.3848,1.6771) .. controls (1.2665,2.2823) and (0.5559,2.2697) .. (0.4000,1.6455) .. controls (0.5711,1.6714) and (0.8503,1.6562) .. (0.9926,1.6247) .. controls (0.9703,1.4641) and (1.0307,1.0718) .. (1.1444,1.0104) .. controls (1.3485,0.9002) and (1.4461,1.4498) .. (1.3848,1.6771) -- cycle;

                            fill[gray] (0.9153,1.4857) -- (0.9472,1.6278) -- (1.3926,1.5288) -- (1.3840,1.4228) -- cycle;
                            fill[gray] (0.6484,1.6773) -- (0.6601,1.7155) -- (0.7558,1.6863) -- (0.7441,1.6480) -- cycle;

                            draw[gray,fill=black] (0.83,1.57) circle (0.135);
                            draw[gray,fill=black] (0.54,1.65) circle (0.12);

                            end{tikzpicture}
                            end{document}


                            enter image description here






                            share|improve this answer













                            The next revolution in aviation:



                            The duck plane



                            documentclass{standalone}

                            usepackage{tikzducks}

                            begin{document}
                            begin{tikzpicture}
                            duck

                            fill[orange] (0.7331,0.5229) .. controls (1.8688,-0.6326) and (2.2337,0.0383) .. (1.2819,0.7331) -- cycle;

                            fill[brown] (1.3848,1.6771) .. controls (1.2665,2.2823) and (0.5559,2.2697) .. (0.4000,1.6455) .. controls (0.5711,1.6714) and (0.8503,1.6562) .. (0.9926,1.6247) .. controls (0.9703,1.4641) and (1.0307,1.0718) .. (1.1444,1.0104) .. controls (1.3485,0.9002) and (1.4461,1.4498) .. (1.3848,1.6771) -- cycle;

                            fill[gray] (0.9153,1.4857) -- (0.9472,1.6278) -- (1.3926,1.5288) -- (1.3840,1.4228) -- cycle;
                            fill[gray] (0.6484,1.6773) -- (0.6601,1.7155) -- (0.7558,1.6863) -- (0.7441,1.6480) -- cycle;

                            draw[gray,fill=black] (0.83,1.57) circle (0.135);
                            draw[gray,fill=black] (0.54,1.65) circle (0.12);

                            end{tikzpicture}
                            end{document}


                            enter image description here







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Mar 9 at 15:39









                            samcartersamcarter

                            91.9k7105297




                            91.9k7105297






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f114783%2fdraw-an-aircraft-with-tikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                                ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                                Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?