Solving integral with absolute value












0












$begingroup$


With a given $x > 0$ (I think we could restrict it to $x in [0, 3]$), I'm trying to find the following integral:



$$ int_{z = 0}^{min(x,1)} int_{y = 0}^{min(x - z, 1)} |x -z -y -1| dydz $$



However, here I'm not sure how to deal with absolute values. By the construction, the value under the modulus seems to be almost always negative when $x < 1$, and it feels like negative when $x leq 3$, but I feel like I'm missing something.



Any hints on how should we proceed further?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    With a given $x > 0$ (I think we could restrict it to $x in [0, 3]$), I'm trying to find the following integral:



    $$ int_{z = 0}^{min(x,1)} int_{y = 0}^{min(x - z, 1)} |x -z -y -1| dydz $$



    However, here I'm not sure how to deal with absolute values. By the construction, the value under the modulus seems to be almost always negative when $x < 1$, and it feels like negative when $x leq 3$, but I feel like I'm missing something.



    Any hints on how should we proceed further?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      With a given $x > 0$ (I think we could restrict it to $x in [0, 3]$), I'm trying to find the following integral:



      $$ int_{z = 0}^{min(x,1)} int_{y = 0}^{min(x - z, 1)} |x -z -y -1| dydz $$



      However, here I'm not sure how to deal with absolute values. By the construction, the value under the modulus seems to be almost always negative when $x < 1$, and it feels like negative when $x leq 3$, but I feel like I'm missing something.



      Any hints on how should we proceed further?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      With a given $x > 0$ (I think we could restrict it to $x in [0, 3]$), I'm trying to find the following integral:



      $$ int_{z = 0}^{min(x,1)} int_{y = 0}^{min(x - z, 1)} |x -z -y -1| dydz $$



      However, here I'm not sure how to deal with absolute values. By the construction, the value under the modulus seems to be almost always negative when $x < 1$, and it feels like negative when $x leq 3$, but I feel like I'm missing something.



      Any hints on how should we proceed further?







      calculus integration definite-integrals






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 10 '18 at 23:50









      NutleNutle

      332110




      332110






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Like you said, the hardest part here is the absolute value. We can make our lives easier by defining $u := x-z-1$, which simplifies the integrand into $|u - y|$. Since this function has a constant analytic form in the regions $y leq u$ and $y geq u$, we can rewrite our integral as the piecewise function:



          $$ int_{0}^{min(x, 1)}left[ int_{0}^{min(u, 1)}(u-y) dy + int_{max(u, 0)}^{min(1+u, 1)}(y-u) dy right] dz $$



          You still have to deal with the differing behavior of these integrals for different values of $u$, but this should be more mechanical than directly reasoning about the original absolute value. Just use the predictable behavior of $min(a,b)$ and $max(a,b)$, along with the fact that $int_{a}^{b}f(y) dy = 0$ when $ageq b$, as seen by the fact that the region of integration $[a, b] := left{ x | aleq xleq b right}$ is empty.



          After solving the inner integral for each separate region of $u$ (namely, $uleq0$, $ugeq1$, and $0leq uleq1$), you just replace all your $u$'s by $x-z-1$ (including in your inequalities defining the different regions), and solve the outer integral. This requires more of the same case-by-case reasoning, but by this point you'll have the hang of it :)






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034663%2fsolving-integral-with-absolute-value%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Like you said, the hardest part here is the absolute value. We can make our lives easier by defining $u := x-z-1$, which simplifies the integrand into $|u - y|$. Since this function has a constant analytic form in the regions $y leq u$ and $y geq u$, we can rewrite our integral as the piecewise function:



            $$ int_{0}^{min(x, 1)}left[ int_{0}^{min(u, 1)}(u-y) dy + int_{max(u, 0)}^{min(1+u, 1)}(y-u) dy right] dz $$



            You still have to deal with the differing behavior of these integrals for different values of $u$, but this should be more mechanical than directly reasoning about the original absolute value. Just use the predictable behavior of $min(a,b)$ and $max(a,b)$, along with the fact that $int_{a}^{b}f(y) dy = 0$ when $ageq b$, as seen by the fact that the region of integration $[a, b] := left{ x | aleq xleq b right}$ is empty.



            After solving the inner integral for each separate region of $u$ (namely, $uleq0$, $ugeq1$, and $0leq uleq1$), you just replace all your $u$'s by $x-z-1$ (including in your inequalities defining the different regions), and solve the outer integral. This requires more of the same case-by-case reasoning, but by this point you'll have the hang of it :)






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              Like you said, the hardest part here is the absolute value. We can make our lives easier by defining $u := x-z-1$, which simplifies the integrand into $|u - y|$. Since this function has a constant analytic form in the regions $y leq u$ and $y geq u$, we can rewrite our integral as the piecewise function:



              $$ int_{0}^{min(x, 1)}left[ int_{0}^{min(u, 1)}(u-y) dy + int_{max(u, 0)}^{min(1+u, 1)}(y-u) dy right] dz $$



              You still have to deal with the differing behavior of these integrals for different values of $u$, but this should be more mechanical than directly reasoning about the original absolute value. Just use the predictable behavior of $min(a,b)$ and $max(a,b)$, along with the fact that $int_{a}^{b}f(y) dy = 0$ when $ageq b$, as seen by the fact that the region of integration $[a, b] := left{ x | aleq xleq b right}$ is empty.



              After solving the inner integral for each separate region of $u$ (namely, $uleq0$, $ugeq1$, and $0leq uleq1$), you just replace all your $u$'s by $x-z-1$ (including in your inequalities defining the different regions), and solve the outer integral. This requires more of the same case-by-case reasoning, but by this point you'll have the hang of it :)






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                Like you said, the hardest part here is the absolute value. We can make our lives easier by defining $u := x-z-1$, which simplifies the integrand into $|u - y|$. Since this function has a constant analytic form in the regions $y leq u$ and $y geq u$, we can rewrite our integral as the piecewise function:



                $$ int_{0}^{min(x, 1)}left[ int_{0}^{min(u, 1)}(u-y) dy + int_{max(u, 0)}^{min(1+u, 1)}(y-u) dy right] dz $$



                You still have to deal with the differing behavior of these integrals for different values of $u$, but this should be more mechanical than directly reasoning about the original absolute value. Just use the predictable behavior of $min(a,b)$ and $max(a,b)$, along with the fact that $int_{a}^{b}f(y) dy = 0$ when $ageq b$, as seen by the fact that the region of integration $[a, b] := left{ x | aleq xleq b right}$ is empty.



                After solving the inner integral for each separate region of $u$ (namely, $uleq0$, $ugeq1$, and $0leq uleq1$), you just replace all your $u$'s by $x-z-1$ (including in your inequalities defining the different regions), and solve the outer integral. This requires more of the same case-by-case reasoning, but by this point you'll have the hang of it :)






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Like you said, the hardest part here is the absolute value. We can make our lives easier by defining $u := x-z-1$, which simplifies the integrand into $|u - y|$. Since this function has a constant analytic form in the regions $y leq u$ and $y geq u$, we can rewrite our integral as the piecewise function:



                $$ int_{0}^{min(x, 1)}left[ int_{0}^{min(u, 1)}(u-y) dy + int_{max(u, 0)}^{min(1+u, 1)}(y-u) dy right] dz $$



                You still have to deal with the differing behavior of these integrals for different values of $u$, but this should be more mechanical than directly reasoning about the original absolute value. Just use the predictable behavior of $min(a,b)$ and $max(a,b)$, along with the fact that $int_{a}^{b}f(y) dy = 0$ when $ageq b$, as seen by the fact that the region of integration $[a, b] := left{ x | aleq xleq b right}$ is empty.



                After solving the inner integral for each separate region of $u$ (namely, $uleq0$, $ugeq1$, and $0leq uleq1$), you just replace all your $u$'s by $x-z-1$ (including in your inequalities defining the different regions), and solve the outer integral. This requires more of the same case-by-case reasoning, but by this point you'll have the hang of it :)







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 11 '18 at 2:16









                jemisjokyjemisjoky

                361




                361






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034663%2fsolving-integral-with-absolute-value%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                    ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                    Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?