Problem on computing the Fourier transform of the Gaussian












0












$begingroup$


The problem sounds like this.




Show that $stoint_mathbb{R}e^{-(x+is)^2}dx$ is constant wrt
$sinmathbb{R}.$ Then use this fact to shot that
$mathcal{F}(e^{-a|x|^2})=e^{-frac{|x|^2}{a}}$ for $a>0,$ where
$mathcal{F}$ is the Fourier transform on $mathbb{R}$




I know the traditional ODE way to show this fact about the Gaussian bell but this proof got me interested and I don't have any clue on solving this. I've tried to differentiate wrt $s$ but no luck.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes the claim is more than sloppy. For $s in imathbb{R}$ the constantness is obvious from a change of variable. But the function is analytic in $s in mathbb{C}$, thus being constant on some interval implies constant everywhere, in particular constant in $s in mathbb{R}$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 11 '18 at 0:10












  • $begingroup$
    Ok thanks, now the part about that constant function is clear. I still don't know how to show the last part of the problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Hurjui Ionut
    Dec 11 '18 at 0:20






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Expand $(x+is)^2$ you'll see the Fourier transform of $e^{-x^2}$ and with a change of variable the FT of $e^{-a x^2}$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 11 '18 at 0:21










  • $begingroup$
    I still don't get it..
    $endgroup$
    – Hurjui Ionut
    Dec 11 '18 at 0:33
















0












$begingroup$


The problem sounds like this.




Show that $stoint_mathbb{R}e^{-(x+is)^2}dx$ is constant wrt
$sinmathbb{R}.$ Then use this fact to shot that
$mathcal{F}(e^{-a|x|^2})=e^{-frac{|x|^2}{a}}$ for $a>0,$ where
$mathcal{F}$ is the Fourier transform on $mathbb{R}$




I know the traditional ODE way to show this fact about the Gaussian bell but this proof got me interested and I don't have any clue on solving this. I've tried to differentiate wrt $s$ but no luck.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes the claim is more than sloppy. For $s in imathbb{R}$ the constantness is obvious from a change of variable. But the function is analytic in $s in mathbb{C}$, thus being constant on some interval implies constant everywhere, in particular constant in $s in mathbb{R}$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 11 '18 at 0:10












  • $begingroup$
    Ok thanks, now the part about that constant function is clear. I still don't know how to show the last part of the problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Hurjui Ionut
    Dec 11 '18 at 0:20






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Expand $(x+is)^2$ you'll see the Fourier transform of $e^{-x^2}$ and with a change of variable the FT of $e^{-a x^2}$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 11 '18 at 0:21










  • $begingroup$
    I still don't get it..
    $endgroup$
    – Hurjui Ionut
    Dec 11 '18 at 0:33














0












0








0





$begingroup$


The problem sounds like this.




Show that $stoint_mathbb{R}e^{-(x+is)^2}dx$ is constant wrt
$sinmathbb{R}.$ Then use this fact to shot that
$mathcal{F}(e^{-a|x|^2})=e^{-frac{|x|^2}{a}}$ for $a>0,$ where
$mathcal{F}$ is the Fourier transform on $mathbb{R}$




I know the traditional ODE way to show this fact about the Gaussian bell but this proof got me interested and I don't have any clue on solving this. I've tried to differentiate wrt $s$ but no luck.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




The problem sounds like this.




Show that $stoint_mathbb{R}e^{-(x+is)^2}dx$ is constant wrt
$sinmathbb{R}.$ Then use this fact to shot that
$mathcal{F}(e^{-a|x|^2})=e^{-frac{|x|^2}{a}}$ for $a>0,$ where
$mathcal{F}$ is the Fourier transform on $mathbb{R}$




I know the traditional ODE way to show this fact about the Gaussian bell but this proof got me interested and I don't have any clue on solving this. I've tried to differentiate wrt $s$ but no luck.







fourier-analysis fourier-transform gaussian-integral






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 10 '18 at 23:58









Hurjui IonutHurjui Ionut

501412




501412








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes the claim is more than sloppy. For $s in imathbb{R}$ the constantness is obvious from a change of variable. But the function is analytic in $s in mathbb{C}$, thus being constant on some interval implies constant everywhere, in particular constant in $s in mathbb{R}$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 11 '18 at 0:10












  • $begingroup$
    Ok thanks, now the part about that constant function is clear. I still don't know how to show the last part of the problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Hurjui Ionut
    Dec 11 '18 at 0:20






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Expand $(x+is)^2$ you'll see the Fourier transform of $e^{-x^2}$ and with a change of variable the FT of $e^{-a x^2}$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 11 '18 at 0:21










  • $begingroup$
    I still don't get it..
    $endgroup$
    – Hurjui Ionut
    Dec 11 '18 at 0:33














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes the claim is more than sloppy. For $s in imathbb{R}$ the constantness is obvious from a change of variable. But the function is analytic in $s in mathbb{C}$, thus being constant on some interval implies constant everywhere, in particular constant in $s in mathbb{R}$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 11 '18 at 0:10












  • $begingroup$
    Ok thanks, now the part about that constant function is clear. I still don't know how to show the last part of the problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Hurjui Ionut
    Dec 11 '18 at 0:20






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Expand $(x+is)^2$ you'll see the Fourier transform of $e^{-x^2}$ and with a change of variable the FT of $e^{-a x^2}$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 11 '18 at 0:21










  • $begingroup$
    I still don't get it..
    $endgroup$
    – Hurjui Ionut
    Dec 11 '18 at 0:33








1




1




$begingroup$
Yes the claim is more than sloppy. For $s in imathbb{R}$ the constantness is obvious from a change of variable. But the function is analytic in $s in mathbb{C}$, thus being constant on some interval implies constant everywhere, in particular constant in $s in mathbb{R}$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 11 '18 at 0:10






$begingroup$
Yes the claim is more than sloppy. For $s in imathbb{R}$ the constantness is obvious from a change of variable. But the function is analytic in $s in mathbb{C}$, thus being constant on some interval implies constant everywhere, in particular constant in $s in mathbb{R}$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 11 '18 at 0:10














$begingroup$
Ok thanks, now the part about that constant function is clear. I still don't know how to show the last part of the problem.
$endgroup$
– Hurjui Ionut
Dec 11 '18 at 0:20




$begingroup$
Ok thanks, now the part about that constant function is clear. I still don't know how to show the last part of the problem.
$endgroup$
– Hurjui Ionut
Dec 11 '18 at 0:20




1




1




$begingroup$
Expand $(x+is)^2$ you'll see the Fourier transform of $e^{-x^2}$ and with a change of variable the FT of $e^{-a x^2}$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 11 '18 at 0:21




$begingroup$
Expand $(x+is)^2$ you'll see the Fourier transform of $e^{-x^2}$ and with a change of variable the FT of $e^{-a x^2}$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 11 '18 at 0:21












$begingroup$
I still don't get it..
$endgroup$
– Hurjui Ionut
Dec 11 '18 at 0:33




$begingroup$
I still don't get it..
$endgroup$
– Hurjui Ionut
Dec 11 '18 at 0:33










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034673%2fproblem-on-computing-the-fourier-transform-of-the-gaussian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3034673%2fproblem-on-computing-the-fourier-transform-of-the-gaussian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?