Is instantiating a GUID in Entity Framework Core bad practice?












9















If I have a model with a key of type Guid, is it bad practise to set the ID explicitly in the constructor?



I know it will be set implicitly by Entity Framework, but will anything bad happen (perhaps performance wise) from setting it explicitly?



Example:



class MyModel
{
public MyModel()
{
Id = Guid.NewGuid();
}

[Key]
public Guid Id { get; set; }
}


I'm thinking a Guid is backed up by a sequential ID in SQL server, and if I set a value explicitly, I suppose I will decrease indexing performance because it will no longer be sequential?



I have not been able to find an answer on this and I am highly curious about it.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Test it yourself. Create 100000 entities and let EF assign the GUID. Profile a few queries against it. Wipe the table, then create 100000 entities with a GUID you new up yourself and profile that. I will assume (and it is only an assumption), that there'll be no difference.

    – JᴀʏMᴇᴇ
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:03








  • 1





    guids aren't sequential though. They tend to be if generated by the same system, but that seems foolish to rely on.

    – JNevill
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:03













  • The SQL datatype for a .Net Guid is a uniqueidentifier

    – Oliver
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:04


















9















If I have a model with a key of type Guid, is it bad practise to set the ID explicitly in the constructor?



I know it will be set implicitly by Entity Framework, but will anything bad happen (perhaps performance wise) from setting it explicitly?



Example:



class MyModel
{
public MyModel()
{
Id = Guid.NewGuid();
}

[Key]
public Guid Id { get; set; }
}


I'm thinking a Guid is backed up by a sequential ID in SQL server, and if I set a value explicitly, I suppose I will decrease indexing performance because it will no longer be sequential?



I have not been able to find an answer on this and I am highly curious about it.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Test it yourself. Create 100000 entities and let EF assign the GUID. Profile a few queries against it. Wipe the table, then create 100000 entities with a GUID you new up yourself and profile that. I will assume (and it is only an assumption), that there'll be no difference.

    – JᴀʏMᴇᴇ
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:03








  • 1





    guids aren't sequential though. They tend to be if generated by the same system, but that seems foolish to rely on.

    – JNevill
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:03













  • The SQL datatype for a .Net Guid is a uniqueidentifier

    – Oliver
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:04
















9












9








9








If I have a model with a key of type Guid, is it bad practise to set the ID explicitly in the constructor?



I know it will be set implicitly by Entity Framework, but will anything bad happen (perhaps performance wise) from setting it explicitly?



Example:



class MyModel
{
public MyModel()
{
Id = Guid.NewGuid();
}

[Key]
public Guid Id { get; set; }
}


I'm thinking a Guid is backed up by a sequential ID in SQL server, and if I set a value explicitly, I suppose I will decrease indexing performance because it will no longer be sequential?



I have not been able to find an answer on this and I am highly curious about it.










share|improve this question
















If I have a model with a key of type Guid, is it bad practise to set the ID explicitly in the constructor?



I know it will be set implicitly by Entity Framework, but will anything bad happen (perhaps performance wise) from setting it explicitly?



Example:



class MyModel
{
public MyModel()
{
Id = Guid.NewGuid();
}

[Key]
public Guid Id { get; set; }
}


I'm thinking a Guid is backed up by a sequential ID in SQL server, and if I set a value explicitly, I suppose I will decrease indexing performance because it will no longer be sequential?



I have not been able to find an answer on this and I am highly curious about it.







c# entity-framework-core guid






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 21 '18 at 3:00









TanvirArjel

8,67432046




8,67432046










asked Nov 20 '18 at 14:00









Mathias Lykkegaard LorenzenMathias Lykkegaard Lorenzen

6,8731770142




6,8731770142








  • 1





    Test it yourself. Create 100000 entities and let EF assign the GUID. Profile a few queries against it. Wipe the table, then create 100000 entities with a GUID you new up yourself and profile that. I will assume (and it is only an assumption), that there'll be no difference.

    – JᴀʏMᴇᴇ
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:03








  • 1





    guids aren't sequential though. They tend to be if generated by the same system, but that seems foolish to rely on.

    – JNevill
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:03













  • The SQL datatype for a .Net Guid is a uniqueidentifier

    – Oliver
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:04
















  • 1





    Test it yourself. Create 100000 entities and let EF assign the GUID. Profile a few queries against it. Wipe the table, then create 100000 entities with a GUID you new up yourself and profile that. I will assume (and it is only an assumption), that there'll be no difference.

    – JᴀʏMᴇᴇ
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:03








  • 1





    guids aren't sequential though. They tend to be if generated by the same system, but that seems foolish to rely on.

    – JNevill
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:03













  • The SQL datatype for a .Net Guid is a uniqueidentifier

    – Oliver
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:04










1




1





Test it yourself. Create 100000 entities and let EF assign the GUID. Profile a few queries against it. Wipe the table, then create 100000 entities with a GUID you new up yourself and profile that. I will assume (and it is only an assumption), that there'll be no difference.

– JᴀʏMᴇᴇ
Nov 20 '18 at 14:03







Test it yourself. Create 100000 entities and let EF assign the GUID. Profile a few queries against it. Wipe the table, then create 100000 entities with a GUID you new up yourself and profile that. I will assume (and it is only an assumption), that there'll be no difference.

– JᴀʏMᴇᴇ
Nov 20 '18 at 14:03






1




1





guids aren't sequential though. They tend to be if generated by the same system, but that seems foolish to rely on.

– JNevill
Nov 20 '18 at 14:03







guids aren't sequential though. They tend to be if generated by the same system, but that seems foolish to rely on.

– JNevill
Nov 20 '18 at 14:03















The SQL datatype for a .Net Guid is a uniqueidentifier

– Oliver
Nov 20 '18 at 14:04







The SQL datatype for a .Net Guid is a uniqueidentifier

– Oliver
Nov 20 '18 at 14:04














1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















11














I see a design flaw rather than a performance problem: models shouldn't generate their id. It's out of their responsibility. Repositories do so in the Add method.



Guid can be generated in many ways: for example, it can be random or sequential. There're different algorithms to generate them either way. Therefore, you're closing your choices to just one.



And you're forcing the moment on which the model id is assigned: you mighn't want this in order to delay its assignment until the model may need to be persisted. For example, a zero Guid may be useful to know that some model isn't persistent yet.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53394676%2fis-instantiating-a-guid-in-entity-framework-core-bad-practice%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    11














    I see a design flaw rather than a performance problem: models shouldn't generate their id. It's out of their responsibility. Repositories do so in the Add method.



    Guid can be generated in many ways: for example, it can be random or sequential. There're different algorithms to generate them either way. Therefore, you're closing your choices to just one.



    And you're forcing the moment on which the model id is assigned: you mighn't want this in order to delay its assignment until the model may need to be persisted. For example, a zero Guid may be useful to know that some model isn't persistent yet.






    share|improve this answer






























      11














      I see a design flaw rather than a performance problem: models shouldn't generate their id. It's out of their responsibility. Repositories do so in the Add method.



      Guid can be generated in many ways: for example, it can be random or sequential. There're different algorithms to generate them either way. Therefore, you're closing your choices to just one.



      And you're forcing the moment on which the model id is assigned: you mighn't want this in order to delay its assignment until the model may need to be persisted. For example, a zero Guid may be useful to know that some model isn't persistent yet.






      share|improve this answer




























        11












        11








        11







        I see a design flaw rather than a performance problem: models shouldn't generate their id. It's out of their responsibility. Repositories do so in the Add method.



        Guid can be generated in many ways: for example, it can be random or sequential. There're different algorithms to generate them either way. Therefore, you're closing your choices to just one.



        And you're forcing the moment on which the model id is assigned: you mighn't want this in order to delay its assignment until the model may need to be persisted. For example, a zero Guid may be useful to know that some model isn't persistent yet.






        share|improve this answer















        I see a design flaw rather than a performance problem: models shouldn't generate their id. It's out of their responsibility. Repositories do so in the Add method.



        Guid can be generated in many ways: for example, it can be random or sequential. There're different algorithms to generate them either way. Therefore, you're closing your choices to just one.



        And you're forcing the moment on which the model id is assigned: you mighn't want this in order to delay its assignment until the model may need to be persisted. For example, a zero Guid may be useful to know that some model isn't persistent yet.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 20 '18 at 14:13

























        answered Nov 20 '18 at 14:07









        Matías FidemraizerMatías Fidemraizer

        49.5k1283148




        49.5k1283148
































            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53394676%2fis-instantiating-a-guid-in-entity-framework-core-bad-practice%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

            ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

            Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?