How can I nest multiple groups of nodes with the tikz package? [closed]












0















For generating nodes with the tikz package, I'd like to nest some. I've tried the environ package to convert the node command into an environment like so:



NewEnviron{NodeEnv}[2]{
node[#1](#2){BODY};
}


This will be used in the following situation where a node containing a new tikzpicture is used:



begin{tikzpicture}
% Adding as many nodes and paths as preferred
% ...
% Adding a level of nesting
begin{NodeEnv}{NodeType}{NodeName}
begin{tikzpicture}
% Adding as many nodes and paths as preferred
% ...
% Adding a level of nesting
begin{NodeEnv}{OtherNodeType}{OtherNodeName}
begin{tikzpicture}
% Etc.
end{tikzpicture}
end{NodeEnv}
end{tikzpicture}
end{NodeEnv}
end{tikzpicture}


As I've understood from some research, is that BODY will be overwritten by nesting. I've seen something with letxBODYBODY, but that won't work when I nest the same function. Is there a solution for this? EDIT: This is not the case. BODY is not overwritten and works fine. The 'newenviron' package doesn't work in my case, but the 'environ' package does work.



(As for why I'm nesting tikzpictures: I need to group nodes together and create paths between all those groups of nodes, using the group anchors (by fitting a rectangle around the nodes.))










share|improve this question















closed as unclear what you're asking by samcarter, JouleV, Raaja, Kurt, Stefan Pinnow Mar 22 at 16:29


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.



















  • Welcome to TeX-SE! You should never nest tikzpictures. This is not supported. If you describe in more detail what you need, I am pretty sure there will be a solution that does not nest tikzpictures, e.g. using matrix, fit and so on.

    – marmot
    Mar 19 at 15:45








  • 1





    You can put tikzpictures into saveboxes and use usebox inside nodes.

    – John Kormylo
    Mar 19 at 15:50











  • @JohnKormylo You should probably add that if you do that you will lose the anchors of the nodes you stored in the saveboxes.

    – marmot
    Mar 19 at 16:13











  • @marmot, if you use [remember picture] in both tikzpictures, you can still use the anchors. OTOH, if you use the same savebox more than once, tikz will get confused.

    – John Kormylo
    Mar 19 at 16:21













  • @JohnKormylo No.

    – marmot
    Mar 19 at 16:36
















0















For generating nodes with the tikz package, I'd like to nest some. I've tried the environ package to convert the node command into an environment like so:



NewEnviron{NodeEnv}[2]{
node[#1](#2){BODY};
}


This will be used in the following situation where a node containing a new tikzpicture is used:



begin{tikzpicture}
% Adding as many nodes and paths as preferred
% ...
% Adding a level of nesting
begin{NodeEnv}{NodeType}{NodeName}
begin{tikzpicture}
% Adding as many nodes and paths as preferred
% ...
% Adding a level of nesting
begin{NodeEnv}{OtherNodeType}{OtherNodeName}
begin{tikzpicture}
% Etc.
end{tikzpicture}
end{NodeEnv}
end{tikzpicture}
end{NodeEnv}
end{tikzpicture}


As I've understood from some research, is that BODY will be overwritten by nesting. I've seen something with letxBODYBODY, but that won't work when I nest the same function. Is there a solution for this? EDIT: This is not the case. BODY is not overwritten and works fine. The 'newenviron' package doesn't work in my case, but the 'environ' package does work.



(As for why I'm nesting tikzpictures: I need to group nodes together and create paths between all those groups of nodes, using the group anchors (by fitting a rectangle around the nodes.))










share|improve this question















closed as unclear what you're asking by samcarter, JouleV, Raaja, Kurt, Stefan Pinnow Mar 22 at 16:29


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.



















  • Welcome to TeX-SE! You should never nest tikzpictures. This is not supported. If you describe in more detail what you need, I am pretty sure there will be a solution that does not nest tikzpictures, e.g. using matrix, fit and so on.

    – marmot
    Mar 19 at 15:45








  • 1





    You can put tikzpictures into saveboxes and use usebox inside nodes.

    – John Kormylo
    Mar 19 at 15:50











  • @JohnKormylo You should probably add that if you do that you will lose the anchors of the nodes you stored in the saveboxes.

    – marmot
    Mar 19 at 16:13











  • @marmot, if you use [remember picture] in both tikzpictures, you can still use the anchors. OTOH, if you use the same savebox more than once, tikz will get confused.

    – John Kormylo
    Mar 19 at 16:21













  • @JohnKormylo No.

    – marmot
    Mar 19 at 16:36














0












0








0








For generating nodes with the tikz package, I'd like to nest some. I've tried the environ package to convert the node command into an environment like so:



NewEnviron{NodeEnv}[2]{
node[#1](#2){BODY};
}


This will be used in the following situation where a node containing a new tikzpicture is used:



begin{tikzpicture}
% Adding as many nodes and paths as preferred
% ...
% Adding a level of nesting
begin{NodeEnv}{NodeType}{NodeName}
begin{tikzpicture}
% Adding as many nodes and paths as preferred
% ...
% Adding a level of nesting
begin{NodeEnv}{OtherNodeType}{OtherNodeName}
begin{tikzpicture}
% Etc.
end{tikzpicture}
end{NodeEnv}
end{tikzpicture}
end{NodeEnv}
end{tikzpicture}


As I've understood from some research, is that BODY will be overwritten by nesting. I've seen something with letxBODYBODY, but that won't work when I nest the same function. Is there a solution for this? EDIT: This is not the case. BODY is not overwritten and works fine. The 'newenviron' package doesn't work in my case, but the 'environ' package does work.



(As for why I'm nesting tikzpictures: I need to group nodes together and create paths between all those groups of nodes, using the group anchors (by fitting a rectangle around the nodes.))










share|improve this question
















For generating nodes with the tikz package, I'd like to nest some. I've tried the environ package to convert the node command into an environment like so:



NewEnviron{NodeEnv}[2]{
node[#1](#2){BODY};
}


This will be used in the following situation where a node containing a new tikzpicture is used:



begin{tikzpicture}
% Adding as many nodes and paths as preferred
% ...
% Adding a level of nesting
begin{NodeEnv}{NodeType}{NodeName}
begin{tikzpicture}
% Adding as many nodes and paths as preferred
% ...
% Adding a level of nesting
begin{NodeEnv}{OtherNodeType}{OtherNodeName}
begin{tikzpicture}
% Etc.
end{tikzpicture}
end{NodeEnv}
end{tikzpicture}
end{NodeEnv}
end{tikzpicture}


As I've understood from some research, is that BODY will be overwritten by nesting. I've seen something with letxBODYBODY, but that won't work when I nest the same function. Is there a solution for this? EDIT: This is not the case. BODY is not overwritten and works fine. The 'newenviron' package doesn't work in my case, but the 'environ' package does work.



(As for why I'm nesting tikzpictures: I need to group nodes together and create paths between all those groups of nodes, using the group anchors (by fitting a rectangle around the nodes.))







environments nesting tikz-node






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 22 at 15:52







David M.

















asked Mar 19 at 15:33









David M.David M.

185




185




closed as unclear what you're asking by samcarter, JouleV, Raaja, Kurt, Stefan Pinnow Mar 22 at 16:29


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









closed as unclear what you're asking by samcarter, JouleV, Raaja, Kurt, Stefan Pinnow Mar 22 at 16:29


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • Welcome to TeX-SE! You should never nest tikzpictures. This is not supported. If you describe in more detail what you need, I am pretty sure there will be a solution that does not nest tikzpictures, e.g. using matrix, fit and so on.

    – marmot
    Mar 19 at 15:45








  • 1





    You can put tikzpictures into saveboxes and use usebox inside nodes.

    – John Kormylo
    Mar 19 at 15:50











  • @JohnKormylo You should probably add that if you do that you will lose the anchors of the nodes you stored in the saveboxes.

    – marmot
    Mar 19 at 16:13











  • @marmot, if you use [remember picture] in both tikzpictures, you can still use the anchors. OTOH, if you use the same savebox more than once, tikz will get confused.

    – John Kormylo
    Mar 19 at 16:21













  • @JohnKormylo No.

    – marmot
    Mar 19 at 16:36



















  • Welcome to TeX-SE! You should never nest tikzpictures. This is not supported. If you describe in more detail what you need, I am pretty sure there will be a solution that does not nest tikzpictures, e.g. using matrix, fit and so on.

    – marmot
    Mar 19 at 15:45








  • 1





    You can put tikzpictures into saveboxes and use usebox inside nodes.

    – John Kormylo
    Mar 19 at 15:50











  • @JohnKormylo You should probably add that if you do that you will lose the anchors of the nodes you stored in the saveboxes.

    – marmot
    Mar 19 at 16:13











  • @marmot, if you use [remember picture] in both tikzpictures, you can still use the anchors. OTOH, if you use the same savebox more than once, tikz will get confused.

    – John Kormylo
    Mar 19 at 16:21













  • @JohnKormylo No.

    – marmot
    Mar 19 at 16:36

















Welcome to TeX-SE! You should never nest tikzpictures. This is not supported. If you describe in more detail what you need, I am pretty sure there will be a solution that does not nest tikzpictures, e.g. using matrix, fit and so on.

– marmot
Mar 19 at 15:45







Welcome to TeX-SE! You should never nest tikzpictures. This is not supported. If you describe in more detail what you need, I am pretty sure there will be a solution that does not nest tikzpictures, e.g. using matrix, fit and so on.

– marmot
Mar 19 at 15:45






1




1





You can put tikzpictures into saveboxes and use usebox inside nodes.

– John Kormylo
Mar 19 at 15:50





You can put tikzpictures into saveboxes and use usebox inside nodes.

– John Kormylo
Mar 19 at 15:50













@JohnKormylo You should probably add that if you do that you will lose the anchors of the nodes you stored in the saveboxes.

– marmot
Mar 19 at 16:13





@JohnKormylo You should probably add that if you do that you will lose the anchors of the nodes you stored in the saveboxes.

– marmot
Mar 19 at 16:13













@marmot, if you use [remember picture] in both tikzpictures, you can still use the anchors. OTOH, if you use the same savebox more than once, tikz will get confused.

– John Kormylo
Mar 19 at 16:21







@marmot, if you use [remember picture] in both tikzpictures, you can still use the anchors. OTOH, if you use the same savebox more than once, tikz will get confused.

– John Kormylo
Mar 19 at 16:21















@JohnKormylo No.

– marmot
Mar 19 at 16:36





@JohnKormylo No.

– marmot
Mar 19 at 16:36










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Not an answer, but a demonstration that you CAN save anchors in saveboxes. Remember to run it twice.



documentclass{standalone}  
usepackage{tikz}
newsavebox{tempbox}% reserve global name
begin{document}
saveboxtempbox{begin{tikzpicture}[remember picture]
path (0,0) coordinate (A);% Note: coordinate by itself does NOT affect the bounding box
node (B) at (1,1) {test};
end{tikzpicture}}%
begin{tikzpicture}[remember picture]
node (C) at (0,0) {useboxtempbox};
draw[red] (A) -- (B);
draw[blue] (B.south west) rectangle (B.north east);
draw[green] (C.south west) rectangle (C.north east);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


demo






share|improve this answer


























  • Please try e.g. node[scale=0.5] (C) at (1,0) {useboxtempbox}; in your answer to understand what I meant above. Your example "works" by accident and any nontrivial application will fail, as shown by the . node[scale=0.5] (C) at (1,0) {useboxtempbox}; example.

    – marmot
    Mar 22 at 17:17











  • @marmot - I admit that scaling the node does not scale the anchor offsets. I would not be surprised if rotating or any other node operations would cause similar problems. So as Henny Youngman would say, don't do that. One can always apply the transformations INSIDE the savebox.

    – John Kormylo
    Mar 22 at 17:30








  • 1





    Well, the reason why one should avoid nesting tikzpictures is that the pgf keys of the embedding pictures affect the keys of the inner one. It is true that you can "switch them off" by using a savebox, as you did. However, then they are "switched off" and you can no longer use any nontrivial transformations and so on. So my take is that "don't do that" applies to the whole story.

    – marmot
    Mar 22 at 17:35











  • @marmot - But it is so darn useful! As I said, any transformation you want to apply to the node can be applied inside the savebox, and those work just fine.

    – John Kormylo
    Mar 22 at 17:52











  • I guess we disagree on the usefulness. Personally I think this practice leads to shaky results which are in general impossible to control. So far I have not seen anything that can only be achieved by nesting tikzpictures. However, I have seen many examples where nesting tikzpictures lead to problems. Of course, nesting tikzpictures in saveboxes is fine as long as you do not use their node anchors but just include them in the same way you'd include a graphics.

    – marmot
    Mar 22 at 17:57


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














Not an answer, but a demonstration that you CAN save anchors in saveboxes. Remember to run it twice.



documentclass{standalone}  
usepackage{tikz}
newsavebox{tempbox}% reserve global name
begin{document}
saveboxtempbox{begin{tikzpicture}[remember picture]
path (0,0) coordinate (A);% Note: coordinate by itself does NOT affect the bounding box
node (B) at (1,1) {test};
end{tikzpicture}}%
begin{tikzpicture}[remember picture]
node (C) at (0,0) {useboxtempbox};
draw[red] (A) -- (B);
draw[blue] (B.south west) rectangle (B.north east);
draw[green] (C.south west) rectangle (C.north east);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


demo






share|improve this answer


























  • Please try e.g. node[scale=0.5] (C) at (1,0) {useboxtempbox}; in your answer to understand what I meant above. Your example "works" by accident and any nontrivial application will fail, as shown by the . node[scale=0.5] (C) at (1,0) {useboxtempbox}; example.

    – marmot
    Mar 22 at 17:17











  • @marmot - I admit that scaling the node does not scale the anchor offsets. I would not be surprised if rotating or any other node operations would cause similar problems. So as Henny Youngman would say, don't do that. One can always apply the transformations INSIDE the savebox.

    – John Kormylo
    Mar 22 at 17:30








  • 1





    Well, the reason why one should avoid nesting tikzpictures is that the pgf keys of the embedding pictures affect the keys of the inner one. It is true that you can "switch them off" by using a savebox, as you did. However, then they are "switched off" and you can no longer use any nontrivial transformations and so on. So my take is that "don't do that" applies to the whole story.

    – marmot
    Mar 22 at 17:35











  • @marmot - But it is so darn useful! As I said, any transformation you want to apply to the node can be applied inside the savebox, and those work just fine.

    – John Kormylo
    Mar 22 at 17:52











  • I guess we disagree on the usefulness. Personally I think this practice leads to shaky results which are in general impossible to control. So far I have not seen anything that can only be achieved by nesting tikzpictures. However, I have seen many examples where nesting tikzpictures lead to problems. Of course, nesting tikzpictures in saveboxes is fine as long as you do not use their node anchors but just include them in the same way you'd include a graphics.

    – marmot
    Mar 22 at 17:57
















0














Not an answer, but a demonstration that you CAN save anchors in saveboxes. Remember to run it twice.



documentclass{standalone}  
usepackage{tikz}
newsavebox{tempbox}% reserve global name
begin{document}
saveboxtempbox{begin{tikzpicture}[remember picture]
path (0,0) coordinate (A);% Note: coordinate by itself does NOT affect the bounding box
node (B) at (1,1) {test};
end{tikzpicture}}%
begin{tikzpicture}[remember picture]
node (C) at (0,0) {useboxtempbox};
draw[red] (A) -- (B);
draw[blue] (B.south west) rectangle (B.north east);
draw[green] (C.south west) rectangle (C.north east);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


demo






share|improve this answer


























  • Please try e.g. node[scale=0.5] (C) at (1,0) {useboxtempbox}; in your answer to understand what I meant above. Your example "works" by accident and any nontrivial application will fail, as shown by the . node[scale=0.5] (C) at (1,0) {useboxtempbox}; example.

    – marmot
    Mar 22 at 17:17











  • @marmot - I admit that scaling the node does not scale the anchor offsets. I would not be surprised if rotating or any other node operations would cause similar problems. So as Henny Youngman would say, don't do that. One can always apply the transformations INSIDE the savebox.

    – John Kormylo
    Mar 22 at 17:30








  • 1





    Well, the reason why one should avoid nesting tikzpictures is that the pgf keys of the embedding pictures affect the keys of the inner one. It is true that you can "switch them off" by using a savebox, as you did. However, then they are "switched off" and you can no longer use any nontrivial transformations and so on. So my take is that "don't do that" applies to the whole story.

    – marmot
    Mar 22 at 17:35











  • @marmot - But it is so darn useful! As I said, any transformation you want to apply to the node can be applied inside the savebox, and those work just fine.

    – John Kormylo
    Mar 22 at 17:52











  • I guess we disagree on the usefulness. Personally I think this practice leads to shaky results which are in general impossible to control. So far I have not seen anything that can only be achieved by nesting tikzpictures. However, I have seen many examples where nesting tikzpictures lead to problems. Of course, nesting tikzpictures in saveboxes is fine as long as you do not use their node anchors but just include them in the same way you'd include a graphics.

    – marmot
    Mar 22 at 17:57














0












0








0







Not an answer, but a demonstration that you CAN save anchors in saveboxes. Remember to run it twice.



documentclass{standalone}  
usepackage{tikz}
newsavebox{tempbox}% reserve global name
begin{document}
saveboxtempbox{begin{tikzpicture}[remember picture]
path (0,0) coordinate (A);% Note: coordinate by itself does NOT affect the bounding box
node (B) at (1,1) {test};
end{tikzpicture}}%
begin{tikzpicture}[remember picture]
node (C) at (0,0) {useboxtempbox};
draw[red] (A) -- (B);
draw[blue] (B.south west) rectangle (B.north east);
draw[green] (C.south west) rectangle (C.north east);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


demo






share|improve this answer















Not an answer, but a demonstration that you CAN save anchors in saveboxes. Remember to run it twice.



documentclass{standalone}  
usepackage{tikz}
newsavebox{tempbox}% reserve global name
begin{document}
saveboxtempbox{begin{tikzpicture}[remember picture]
path (0,0) coordinate (A);% Note: coordinate by itself does NOT affect the bounding box
node (B) at (1,1) {test};
end{tikzpicture}}%
begin{tikzpicture}[remember picture]
node (C) at (0,0) {useboxtempbox};
draw[red] (A) -- (B);
draw[blue] (B.south west) rectangle (B.north east);
draw[green] (C.south west) rectangle (C.north east);
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


demo







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 19 at 21:36

























answered Mar 19 at 21:17









John KormyloJohn Kormylo

46.1k22672




46.1k22672













  • Please try e.g. node[scale=0.5] (C) at (1,0) {useboxtempbox}; in your answer to understand what I meant above. Your example "works" by accident and any nontrivial application will fail, as shown by the . node[scale=0.5] (C) at (1,0) {useboxtempbox}; example.

    – marmot
    Mar 22 at 17:17











  • @marmot - I admit that scaling the node does not scale the anchor offsets. I would not be surprised if rotating or any other node operations would cause similar problems. So as Henny Youngman would say, don't do that. One can always apply the transformations INSIDE the savebox.

    – John Kormylo
    Mar 22 at 17:30








  • 1





    Well, the reason why one should avoid nesting tikzpictures is that the pgf keys of the embedding pictures affect the keys of the inner one. It is true that you can "switch them off" by using a savebox, as you did. However, then they are "switched off" and you can no longer use any nontrivial transformations and so on. So my take is that "don't do that" applies to the whole story.

    – marmot
    Mar 22 at 17:35











  • @marmot - But it is so darn useful! As I said, any transformation you want to apply to the node can be applied inside the savebox, and those work just fine.

    – John Kormylo
    Mar 22 at 17:52











  • I guess we disagree on the usefulness. Personally I think this practice leads to shaky results which are in general impossible to control. So far I have not seen anything that can only be achieved by nesting tikzpictures. However, I have seen many examples where nesting tikzpictures lead to problems. Of course, nesting tikzpictures in saveboxes is fine as long as you do not use their node anchors but just include them in the same way you'd include a graphics.

    – marmot
    Mar 22 at 17:57



















  • Please try e.g. node[scale=0.5] (C) at (1,0) {useboxtempbox}; in your answer to understand what I meant above. Your example "works" by accident and any nontrivial application will fail, as shown by the . node[scale=0.5] (C) at (1,0) {useboxtempbox}; example.

    – marmot
    Mar 22 at 17:17











  • @marmot - I admit that scaling the node does not scale the anchor offsets. I would not be surprised if rotating or any other node operations would cause similar problems. So as Henny Youngman would say, don't do that. One can always apply the transformations INSIDE the savebox.

    – John Kormylo
    Mar 22 at 17:30








  • 1





    Well, the reason why one should avoid nesting tikzpictures is that the pgf keys of the embedding pictures affect the keys of the inner one. It is true that you can "switch them off" by using a savebox, as you did. However, then they are "switched off" and you can no longer use any nontrivial transformations and so on. So my take is that "don't do that" applies to the whole story.

    – marmot
    Mar 22 at 17:35











  • @marmot - But it is so darn useful! As I said, any transformation you want to apply to the node can be applied inside the savebox, and those work just fine.

    – John Kormylo
    Mar 22 at 17:52











  • I guess we disagree on the usefulness. Personally I think this practice leads to shaky results which are in general impossible to control. So far I have not seen anything that can only be achieved by nesting tikzpictures. However, I have seen many examples where nesting tikzpictures lead to problems. Of course, nesting tikzpictures in saveboxes is fine as long as you do not use their node anchors but just include them in the same way you'd include a graphics.

    – marmot
    Mar 22 at 17:57

















Please try e.g. node[scale=0.5] (C) at (1,0) {useboxtempbox}; in your answer to understand what I meant above. Your example "works" by accident and any nontrivial application will fail, as shown by the . node[scale=0.5] (C) at (1,0) {useboxtempbox}; example.

– marmot
Mar 22 at 17:17





Please try e.g. node[scale=0.5] (C) at (1,0) {useboxtempbox}; in your answer to understand what I meant above. Your example "works" by accident and any nontrivial application will fail, as shown by the . node[scale=0.5] (C) at (1,0) {useboxtempbox}; example.

– marmot
Mar 22 at 17:17













@marmot - I admit that scaling the node does not scale the anchor offsets. I would not be surprised if rotating or any other node operations would cause similar problems. So as Henny Youngman would say, don't do that. One can always apply the transformations INSIDE the savebox.

– John Kormylo
Mar 22 at 17:30







@marmot - I admit that scaling the node does not scale the anchor offsets. I would not be surprised if rotating or any other node operations would cause similar problems. So as Henny Youngman would say, don't do that. One can always apply the transformations INSIDE the savebox.

– John Kormylo
Mar 22 at 17:30






1




1





Well, the reason why one should avoid nesting tikzpictures is that the pgf keys of the embedding pictures affect the keys of the inner one. It is true that you can "switch them off" by using a savebox, as you did. However, then they are "switched off" and you can no longer use any nontrivial transformations and so on. So my take is that "don't do that" applies to the whole story.

– marmot
Mar 22 at 17:35





Well, the reason why one should avoid nesting tikzpictures is that the pgf keys of the embedding pictures affect the keys of the inner one. It is true that you can "switch them off" by using a savebox, as you did. However, then they are "switched off" and you can no longer use any nontrivial transformations and so on. So my take is that "don't do that" applies to the whole story.

– marmot
Mar 22 at 17:35













@marmot - But it is so darn useful! As I said, any transformation you want to apply to the node can be applied inside the savebox, and those work just fine.

– John Kormylo
Mar 22 at 17:52





@marmot - But it is so darn useful! As I said, any transformation you want to apply to the node can be applied inside the savebox, and those work just fine.

– John Kormylo
Mar 22 at 17:52













I guess we disagree on the usefulness. Personally I think this practice leads to shaky results which are in general impossible to control. So far I have not seen anything that can only be achieved by nesting tikzpictures. However, I have seen many examples where nesting tikzpictures lead to problems. Of course, nesting tikzpictures in saveboxes is fine as long as you do not use their node anchors but just include them in the same way you'd include a graphics.

– marmot
Mar 22 at 17:57





I guess we disagree on the usefulness. Personally I think this practice leads to shaky results which are in general impossible to control. So far I have not seen anything that can only be achieved by nesting tikzpictures. However, I have seen many examples where nesting tikzpictures lead to problems. Of course, nesting tikzpictures in saveboxes is fine as long as you do not use their node anchors but just include them in the same way you'd include a graphics.

– marmot
Mar 22 at 17:57



Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?