Constructing injection into injective group












1












$begingroup$


$newcommand{ZZ}{mathbb{Z}}$
$newcommand{QQ}{mathbb{Q}}$
$newcommand{Hom}{mathrm{Hom}}$
Some time ago I tried to construct for a given abelian group $M$ functorially a group $I(M)$ which should be an injective object (that is a divisible abelian group) and provide an injection $0 to M hookrightarrow I(M)$.



I formed
$$
I(M) = Hom_{ZZ}(F_ZZ Hom_ZZ(M, QQ/ZZ), QQ/ZZ)
$$

where $F_ZZ Hom_ZZ(M,QQ/ZZ)$ is the free abelian group over the abelian group $Hom_ZZ(M,QQ/ZZ)$.



The group $I(M)$ is an injective (divisible) group because of the following equation
$$
Hom_ZZ(N^bullet, Hom_ZZ (F_ZZHom_ZZ(M,QQ/ZZ), QQ/ZZ)) =
Hom_ZZ(N^bullet otimes_ZZ F_ZZ(Hom_ZZ(M, QQ/ZZ)), QQ/ZZ)
$$

where $N^bullet$ is the exact sequence $0 to N' to N to N'' to 0$.
Now tensoring with a free group is exact and $QQ/ZZ$ is an injective group.
So $Hom_ZZ(N^bullet, I(M))$ preserves exactness, especially on $0 to N' to N$ and so $I(M)$ is an injective group.



Now the map $M to I(M)$ is given as
$$
(*) quad m mapsto ((sum_i n_i phi_i) mapsto sum_i n_i phi_i(m))
$$

where $sum_i n_i phi_i$ is an element of $F_ZZ Hom_ZZ(M, QQ/ZZ)$.



Now for every $m in M$ with $m neq 0$ one can construct a map $phi_m:M to QQ/ZZ$ with $phi_m(m) neq 0$ (because $QQ/ZZ$ is an injective group).



So the map $(*)$ is injective by choosing for given $m in M$ the map $phi_m$ as $sum_i n_i phi_i$ in $(*)$.



Two questions



1) Is this proof valid? It seems so simple that it is somewhat embarassing to ask such a question, but:



going through all my commutative algebra books I could not find this proof, although it seems obvious and simple and has the advantage of being functorial in $M$. So



2) Is there a place in the literature where a proof of enough injective objects in the abelian groups (or for modules over a commutative ring) is done with this idea (especially forming a free group with the intent of moving it to the left and tensor with it)?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    $newcommand{ZZ}{mathbb{Z}}$
    $newcommand{QQ}{mathbb{Q}}$
    $newcommand{Hom}{mathrm{Hom}}$
    Some time ago I tried to construct for a given abelian group $M$ functorially a group $I(M)$ which should be an injective object (that is a divisible abelian group) and provide an injection $0 to M hookrightarrow I(M)$.



    I formed
    $$
    I(M) = Hom_{ZZ}(F_ZZ Hom_ZZ(M, QQ/ZZ), QQ/ZZ)
    $$

    where $F_ZZ Hom_ZZ(M,QQ/ZZ)$ is the free abelian group over the abelian group $Hom_ZZ(M,QQ/ZZ)$.



    The group $I(M)$ is an injective (divisible) group because of the following equation
    $$
    Hom_ZZ(N^bullet, Hom_ZZ (F_ZZHom_ZZ(M,QQ/ZZ), QQ/ZZ)) =
    Hom_ZZ(N^bullet otimes_ZZ F_ZZ(Hom_ZZ(M, QQ/ZZ)), QQ/ZZ)
    $$

    where $N^bullet$ is the exact sequence $0 to N' to N to N'' to 0$.
    Now tensoring with a free group is exact and $QQ/ZZ$ is an injective group.
    So $Hom_ZZ(N^bullet, I(M))$ preserves exactness, especially on $0 to N' to N$ and so $I(M)$ is an injective group.



    Now the map $M to I(M)$ is given as
    $$
    (*) quad m mapsto ((sum_i n_i phi_i) mapsto sum_i n_i phi_i(m))
    $$

    where $sum_i n_i phi_i$ is an element of $F_ZZ Hom_ZZ(M, QQ/ZZ)$.



    Now for every $m in M$ with $m neq 0$ one can construct a map $phi_m:M to QQ/ZZ$ with $phi_m(m) neq 0$ (because $QQ/ZZ$ is an injective group).



    So the map $(*)$ is injective by choosing for given $m in M$ the map $phi_m$ as $sum_i n_i phi_i$ in $(*)$.



    Two questions



    1) Is this proof valid? It seems so simple that it is somewhat embarassing to ask such a question, but:



    going through all my commutative algebra books I could not find this proof, although it seems obvious and simple and has the advantage of being functorial in $M$. So



    2) Is there a place in the literature where a proof of enough injective objects in the abelian groups (or for modules over a commutative ring) is done with this idea (especially forming a free group with the intent of moving it to the left and tensor with it)?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      $newcommand{ZZ}{mathbb{Z}}$
      $newcommand{QQ}{mathbb{Q}}$
      $newcommand{Hom}{mathrm{Hom}}$
      Some time ago I tried to construct for a given abelian group $M$ functorially a group $I(M)$ which should be an injective object (that is a divisible abelian group) and provide an injection $0 to M hookrightarrow I(M)$.



      I formed
      $$
      I(M) = Hom_{ZZ}(F_ZZ Hom_ZZ(M, QQ/ZZ), QQ/ZZ)
      $$

      where $F_ZZ Hom_ZZ(M,QQ/ZZ)$ is the free abelian group over the abelian group $Hom_ZZ(M,QQ/ZZ)$.



      The group $I(M)$ is an injective (divisible) group because of the following equation
      $$
      Hom_ZZ(N^bullet, Hom_ZZ (F_ZZHom_ZZ(M,QQ/ZZ), QQ/ZZ)) =
      Hom_ZZ(N^bullet otimes_ZZ F_ZZ(Hom_ZZ(M, QQ/ZZ)), QQ/ZZ)
      $$

      where $N^bullet$ is the exact sequence $0 to N' to N to N'' to 0$.
      Now tensoring with a free group is exact and $QQ/ZZ$ is an injective group.
      So $Hom_ZZ(N^bullet, I(M))$ preserves exactness, especially on $0 to N' to N$ and so $I(M)$ is an injective group.



      Now the map $M to I(M)$ is given as
      $$
      (*) quad m mapsto ((sum_i n_i phi_i) mapsto sum_i n_i phi_i(m))
      $$

      where $sum_i n_i phi_i$ is an element of $F_ZZ Hom_ZZ(M, QQ/ZZ)$.



      Now for every $m in M$ with $m neq 0$ one can construct a map $phi_m:M to QQ/ZZ$ with $phi_m(m) neq 0$ (because $QQ/ZZ$ is an injective group).



      So the map $(*)$ is injective by choosing for given $m in M$ the map $phi_m$ as $sum_i n_i phi_i$ in $(*)$.



      Two questions



      1) Is this proof valid? It seems so simple that it is somewhat embarassing to ask such a question, but:



      going through all my commutative algebra books I could not find this proof, although it seems obvious and simple and has the advantage of being functorial in $M$. So



      2) Is there a place in the literature where a proof of enough injective objects in the abelian groups (or for modules over a commutative ring) is done with this idea (especially forming a free group with the intent of moving it to the left and tensor with it)?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      $newcommand{ZZ}{mathbb{Z}}$
      $newcommand{QQ}{mathbb{Q}}$
      $newcommand{Hom}{mathrm{Hom}}$
      Some time ago I tried to construct for a given abelian group $M$ functorially a group $I(M)$ which should be an injective object (that is a divisible abelian group) and provide an injection $0 to M hookrightarrow I(M)$.



      I formed
      $$
      I(M) = Hom_{ZZ}(F_ZZ Hom_ZZ(M, QQ/ZZ), QQ/ZZ)
      $$

      where $F_ZZ Hom_ZZ(M,QQ/ZZ)$ is the free abelian group over the abelian group $Hom_ZZ(M,QQ/ZZ)$.



      The group $I(M)$ is an injective (divisible) group because of the following equation
      $$
      Hom_ZZ(N^bullet, Hom_ZZ (F_ZZHom_ZZ(M,QQ/ZZ), QQ/ZZ)) =
      Hom_ZZ(N^bullet otimes_ZZ F_ZZ(Hom_ZZ(M, QQ/ZZ)), QQ/ZZ)
      $$

      where $N^bullet$ is the exact sequence $0 to N' to N to N'' to 0$.
      Now tensoring with a free group is exact and $QQ/ZZ$ is an injective group.
      So $Hom_ZZ(N^bullet, I(M))$ preserves exactness, especially on $0 to N' to N$ and so $I(M)$ is an injective group.



      Now the map $M to I(M)$ is given as
      $$
      (*) quad m mapsto ((sum_i n_i phi_i) mapsto sum_i n_i phi_i(m))
      $$

      where $sum_i n_i phi_i$ is an element of $F_ZZ Hom_ZZ(M, QQ/ZZ)$.



      Now for every $m in M$ with $m neq 0$ one can construct a map $phi_m:M to QQ/ZZ$ with $phi_m(m) neq 0$ (because $QQ/ZZ$ is an injective group).



      So the map $(*)$ is injective by choosing for given $m in M$ the map $phi_m$ as $sum_i n_i phi_i$ in $(*)$.



      Two questions



      1) Is this proof valid? It seems so simple that it is somewhat embarassing to ask such a question, but:



      going through all my commutative algebra books I could not find this proof, although it seems obvious and simple and has the advantage of being functorial in $M$. So



      2) Is there a place in the literature where a proof of enough injective objects in the abelian groups (or for modules over a commutative ring) is done with this idea (especially forming a free group with the intent of moving it to the left and tensor with it)?







      reference-request commutative-algebra abelian-groups injective-module






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 11 '18 at 11:40









      Jürgen BöhmJürgen Böhm

      2,303512




      2,303512






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035208%2fconstructing-injection-into-injective-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035208%2fconstructing-injection-into-injective-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

          ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

          Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?