Show that $sqrt 5$ can be expressed as a polynomial in $e^{2pi i/5}$ over $Bbb Z$












1












$begingroup$


Question from a Qualifying Exam:




  • Show that $sqrt 5$ can be expressed as a polynomial in $e^{(frac{2pi i}{5})}$ over $Bbb Z$

  • If in a field the equation $x^2-5$ has no solution then $x^5-1$ also has no non-trivial solution.


I am unable to show how to find the polynomial



Please givesome hints










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In the second question, did you mean to write "nontrivial solution"?
    $endgroup$
    – Ovi
    Nov 26 '18 at 3:10






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    you are missing the $i$ in the exponents of $e ; ; ; $
    $endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Nov 26 '18 at 3:11


















1












$begingroup$


Question from a Qualifying Exam:




  • Show that $sqrt 5$ can be expressed as a polynomial in $e^{(frac{2pi i}{5})}$ over $Bbb Z$

  • If in a field the equation $x^2-5$ has no solution then $x^5-1$ also has no non-trivial solution.


I am unable to show how to find the polynomial



Please givesome hints










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In the second question, did you mean to write "nontrivial solution"?
    $endgroup$
    – Ovi
    Nov 26 '18 at 3:10






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    you are missing the $i$ in the exponents of $e ; ; ; $
    $endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Nov 26 '18 at 3:11
















1












1








1


2



$begingroup$


Question from a Qualifying Exam:




  • Show that $sqrt 5$ can be expressed as a polynomial in $e^{(frac{2pi i}{5})}$ over $Bbb Z$

  • If in a field the equation $x^2-5$ has no solution then $x^5-1$ also has no non-trivial solution.


I am unable to show how to find the polynomial



Please givesome hints










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Question from a Qualifying Exam:




  • Show that $sqrt 5$ can be expressed as a polynomial in $e^{(frac{2pi i}{5})}$ over $Bbb Z$

  • If in a field the equation $x^2-5$ has no solution then $x^5-1$ also has no non-trivial solution.


I am unable to show how to find the polynomial



Please givesome hints







abstract-algebra field-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 26 '18 at 3:33







Join_PhD

















asked Nov 26 '18 at 3:08









Join_PhDJoin_PhD

3618




3618












  • $begingroup$
    In the second question, did you mean to write "nontrivial solution"?
    $endgroup$
    – Ovi
    Nov 26 '18 at 3:10






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    you are missing the $i$ in the exponents of $e ; ; ; $
    $endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Nov 26 '18 at 3:11




















  • $begingroup$
    In the second question, did you mean to write "nontrivial solution"?
    $endgroup$
    – Ovi
    Nov 26 '18 at 3:10






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    you are missing the $i$ in the exponents of $e ; ; ; $
    $endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Nov 26 '18 at 3:11


















$begingroup$
In the second question, did you mean to write "nontrivial solution"?
$endgroup$
– Ovi
Nov 26 '18 at 3:10




$begingroup$
In the second question, did you mean to write "nontrivial solution"?
$endgroup$
– Ovi
Nov 26 '18 at 3:10




3




3




$begingroup$
you are missing the $i$ in the exponents of $e ; ; ; $
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Nov 26 '18 at 3:11






$begingroup$
you are missing the $i$ in the exponents of $e ; ; ; $
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Nov 26 '18 at 3:11












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

To your first question: Here is a high-faluting answer. If $p$ is any odd
prime number (i.e., any prime number $>2$), then the Gauss
sum is defined to be the
number
begin{equation}
gleft( 1;pright) :=sum_{n=0}^{p-1}e^{2pi in^{2}/p}.
end{equation}

Gauss proved that
begin{equation}
gleft( 1;pright) =
begin{cases}
sqrt{p}, & text{if }pequiv1operatorname{mod}4;\
isqrt{p}, & text{if }pequiv3operatorname{mod}4
end{cases}
end{equation}

(and this has been re-proven many times since Gauss; see a post by David
Speyer on
SBSeminar
for my favorite proof, although he denotes $gleft( 1;pright) $ by
$gleft( zetaright) $ and defines it somewhat differently).



Applying this to $p=5$, we obtain $gleft( 1;5right) =sqrt{5}$ (since
$5equiv1operatorname{mod}4$). Hence,
begin{align*}
sqrt{5} & =gleft( 1;5right) =sum_{n=0}^{4}e^{2pi in^{2}/5}=e^{2pi
icdot0^{2}/5}+e^{2pi icdot1^{2}/5}+e^{2pi icdot2^{2}/5}+e^{2pi
icdot3^{2}/5}+e^{2pi icdot4^{2}/5}\
& =z^{0^{2}}+z^{1^{2}}+z^{2^{2}}+z^{3^{2}}+z^{4^{2}},qquadtext{where
}z=e^{2pi i/5}.
end{align*}

This is, of course, a polynomial in $e^{2pi i/5}$ over $mathbb{Z}$. Hence,
your first question is answered.



To your second question: Let $K$ be a field. We shall show that if $x^{2}-5$
has no solution in $K$, then $x^{5}-1$ has no non-trivial solution in $K$.



Indeed, let us prove the contrapositive: Let us prove that if $x^{5}-1$ has a
non-trivial solution in $K$, then $x^{2}-5$ has a solution in $K$.



So we assume that $x^{5}-1$ has a non-trivial solution in $K$. Fix such a
solution, and denote it by $z$. Thus, $z^{5}-1=0$ but $zneq1$.



Inspired by the above answer to the first question, we set $w=z^{0^{2}
}+z^{1^{2}}+z^{2^{2}}+z^{3^{2}}+z^{4^{2}}$
. We shall now prove that
$w^{2}-5=0$.



Indeed, $z-1neq0$ (since $zneq1$). Hence, we can cancel $z-1$ from the
equality $left( z-1right) left( z^{4}+z^{3}+z^{2}+z+1right)
=z^{5}-1=0$
. We thus obtain $z^{4}+z^{3}+z^{2}+z+1=0$, so that $z^{4}
=-z^{3}-z^{2}-z-1$
. Also, from $z^{5}-1=0$, we obtain $z^{5}=1$, thus
$z^{8}=z^{3}$ and $z^{9}=z^{4}$ and $z^{16}=z^{11}=z^{6}=z$. Hence,
begin{align*}
w & =underbrace{z^{0^{2}}}_{=z^{0}=1}+underbrace{z^{1^{2}}}_{=z^{1}
=z}+underbrace{z^{2^{2}}}_{=z^{4}}+underbrace{z^{3^{2}}}_{=z^{9}=z^{4}
}+underbrace{z^{4^{2}}}_{=z^{16}=z}\
& =1+z+z^{4}+z^{4}+z=1+2z+2z^{4}.
end{align*}

Squaring this equality, we find
begin{align*}
w^{2} & =left( 1+2z+2z^{4}right) ^{2}=1+4z+4z^{2}+4z^{4}
+8underbrace{z^{5}}_{=1}+4underbrace{z^{8}}_{=z^{3}}\
& =1+4z+4z^{2}+4z^{4}+8+4z^{3}=5+4underbrace{left( z^{4}+z^{3}
+z^{2}+z+1right) }_{=0}=5.
end{align*}

In other words, $w^{2}-5=0$. Hence, $x^{2}-5$ has a solution in $K$ (namely,
$w$). This answers the second question.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the answer
    $endgroup$
    – Join_PhD
    Nov 26 '18 at 4:06



















2












$begingroup$

Let $w neq 1$ be a 5th root of unity in the first quadrant. Take $x = w + frac{1}{w} = w + w^4.$ Then
$x^2 = w^2 + 2 + frac{1}{w^2}.$ So,
$$ x^2 + x - 1 = w^2 + w + 1 + frac{1}{w} + frac{1}{w^2 } = 0. $$
As $x>0$ we have
$$ x = frac{-1 + sqrt 5}{2} $$
Then $$ 2x + 1 = sqrt 5 $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much
    $endgroup$
    – Join_PhD
    Nov 26 '18 at 4:06











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013766%2fshow-that-sqrt-5-can-be-expressed-as-a-polynomial-in-e2-pi-i-5-over-bb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

To your first question: Here is a high-faluting answer. If $p$ is any odd
prime number (i.e., any prime number $>2$), then the Gauss
sum is defined to be the
number
begin{equation}
gleft( 1;pright) :=sum_{n=0}^{p-1}e^{2pi in^{2}/p}.
end{equation}

Gauss proved that
begin{equation}
gleft( 1;pright) =
begin{cases}
sqrt{p}, & text{if }pequiv1operatorname{mod}4;\
isqrt{p}, & text{if }pequiv3operatorname{mod}4
end{cases}
end{equation}

(and this has been re-proven many times since Gauss; see a post by David
Speyer on
SBSeminar
for my favorite proof, although he denotes $gleft( 1;pright) $ by
$gleft( zetaright) $ and defines it somewhat differently).



Applying this to $p=5$, we obtain $gleft( 1;5right) =sqrt{5}$ (since
$5equiv1operatorname{mod}4$). Hence,
begin{align*}
sqrt{5} & =gleft( 1;5right) =sum_{n=0}^{4}e^{2pi in^{2}/5}=e^{2pi
icdot0^{2}/5}+e^{2pi icdot1^{2}/5}+e^{2pi icdot2^{2}/5}+e^{2pi
icdot3^{2}/5}+e^{2pi icdot4^{2}/5}\
& =z^{0^{2}}+z^{1^{2}}+z^{2^{2}}+z^{3^{2}}+z^{4^{2}},qquadtext{where
}z=e^{2pi i/5}.
end{align*}

This is, of course, a polynomial in $e^{2pi i/5}$ over $mathbb{Z}$. Hence,
your first question is answered.



To your second question: Let $K$ be a field. We shall show that if $x^{2}-5$
has no solution in $K$, then $x^{5}-1$ has no non-trivial solution in $K$.



Indeed, let us prove the contrapositive: Let us prove that if $x^{5}-1$ has a
non-trivial solution in $K$, then $x^{2}-5$ has a solution in $K$.



So we assume that $x^{5}-1$ has a non-trivial solution in $K$. Fix such a
solution, and denote it by $z$. Thus, $z^{5}-1=0$ but $zneq1$.



Inspired by the above answer to the first question, we set $w=z^{0^{2}
}+z^{1^{2}}+z^{2^{2}}+z^{3^{2}}+z^{4^{2}}$
. We shall now prove that
$w^{2}-5=0$.



Indeed, $z-1neq0$ (since $zneq1$). Hence, we can cancel $z-1$ from the
equality $left( z-1right) left( z^{4}+z^{3}+z^{2}+z+1right)
=z^{5}-1=0$
. We thus obtain $z^{4}+z^{3}+z^{2}+z+1=0$, so that $z^{4}
=-z^{3}-z^{2}-z-1$
. Also, from $z^{5}-1=0$, we obtain $z^{5}=1$, thus
$z^{8}=z^{3}$ and $z^{9}=z^{4}$ and $z^{16}=z^{11}=z^{6}=z$. Hence,
begin{align*}
w & =underbrace{z^{0^{2}}}_{=z^{0}=1}+underbrace{z^{1^{2}}}_{=z^{1}
=z}+underbrace{z^{2^{2}}}_{=z^{4}}+underbrace{z^{3^{2}}}_{=z^{9}=z^{4}
}+underbrace{z^{4^{2}}}_{=z^{16}=z}\
& =1+z+z^{4}+z^{4}+z=1+2z+2z^{4}.
end{align*}

Squaring this equality, we find
begin{align*}
w^{2} & =left( 1+2z+2z^{4}right) ^{2}=1+4z+4z^{2}+4z^{4}
+8underbrace{z^{5}}_{=1}+4underbrace{z^{8}}_{=z^{3}}\
& =1+4z+4z^{2}+4z^{4}+8+4z^{3}=5+4underbrace{left( z^{4}+z^{3}
+z^{2}+z+1right) }_{=0}=5.
end{align*}

In other words, $w^{2}-5=0$. Hence, $x^{2}-5$ has a solution in $K$ (namely,
$w$). This answers the second question.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the answer
    $endgroup$
    – Join_PhD
    Nov 26 '18 at 4:06
















2












$begingroup$

To your first question: Here is a high-faluting answer. If $p$ is any odd
prime number (i.e., any prime number $>2$), then the Gauss
sum is defined to be the
number
begin{equation}
gleft( 1;pright) :=sum_{n=0}^{p-1}e^{2pi in^{2}/p}.
end{equation}

Gauss proved that
begin{equation}
gleft( 1;pright) =
begin{cases}
sqrt{p}, & text{if }pequiv1operatorname{mod}4;\
isqrt{p}, & text{if }pequiv3operatorname{mod}4
end{cases}
end{equation}

(and this has been re-proven many times since Gauss; see a post by David
Speyer on
SBSeminar
for my favorite proof, although he denotes $gleft( 1;pright) $ by
$gleft( zetaright) $ and defines it somewhat differently).



Applying this to $p=5$, we obtain $gleft( 1;5right) =sqrt{5}$ (since
$5equiv1operatorname{mod}4$). Hence,
begin{align*}
sqrt{5} & =gleft( 1;5right) =sum_{n=0}^{4}e^{2pi in^{2}/5}=e^{2pi
icdot0^{2}/5}+e^{2pi icdot1^{2}/5}+e^{2pi icdot2^{2}/5}+e^{2pi
icdot3^{2}/5}+e^{2pi icdot4^{2}/5}\
& =z^{0^{2}}+z^{1^{2}}+z^{2^{2}}+z^{3^{2}}+z^{4^{2}},qquadtext{where
}z=e^{2pi i/5}.
end{align*}

This is, of course, a polynomial in $e^{2pi i/5}$ over $mathbb{Z}$. Hence,
your first question is answered.



To your second question: Let $K$ be a field. We shall show that if $x^{2}-5$
has no solution in $K$, then $x^{5}-1$ has no non-trivial solution in $K$.



Indeed, let us prove the contrapositive: Let us prove that if $x^{5}-1$ has a
non-trivial solution in $K$, then $x^{2}-5$ has a solution in $K$.



So we assume that $x^{5}-1$ has a non-trivial solution in $K$. Fix such a
solution, and denote it by $z$. Thus, $z^{5}-1=0$ but $zneq1$.



Inspired by the above answer to the first question, we set $w=z^{0^{2}
}+z^{1^{2}}+z^{2^{2}}+z^{3^{2}}+z^{4^{2}}$
. We shall now prove that
$w^{2}-5=0$.



Indeed, $z-1neq0$ (since $zneq1$). Hence, we can cancel $z-1$ from the
equality $left( z-1right) left( z^{4}+z^{3}+z^{2}+z+1right)
=z^{5}-1=0$
. We thus obtain $z^{4}+z^{3}+z^{2}+z+1=0$, so that $z^{4}
=-z^{3}-z^{2}-z-1$
. Also, from $z^{5}-1=0$, we obtain $z^{5}=1$, thus
$z^{8}=z^{3}$ and $z^{9}=z^{4}$ and $z^{16}=z^{11}=z^{6}=z$. Hence,
begin{align*}
w & =underbrace{z^{0^{2}}}_{=z^{0}=1}+underbrace{z^{1^{2}}}_{=z^{1}
=z}+underbrace{z^{2^{2}}}_{=z^{4}}+underbrace{z^{3^{2}}}_{=z^{9}=z^{4}
}+underbrace{z^{4^{2}}}_{=z^{16}=z}\
& =1+z+z^{4}+z^{4}+z=1+2z+2z^{4}.
end{align*}

Squaring this equality, we find
begin{align*}
w^{2} & =left( 1+2z+2z^{4}right) ^{2}=1+4z+4z^{2}+4z^{4}
+8underbrace{z^{5}}_{=1}+4underbrace{z^{8}}_{=z^{3}}\
& =1+4z+4z^{2}+4z^{4}+8+4z^{3}=5+4underbrace{left( z^{4}+z^{3}
+z^{2}+z+1right) }_{=0}=5.
end{align*}

In other words, $w^{2}-5=0$. Hence, $x^{2}-5$ has a solution in $K$ (namely,
$w$). This answers the second question.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the answer
    $endgroup$
    – Join_PhD
    Nov 26 '18 at 4:06














2












2








2





$begingroup$

To your first question: Here is a high-faluting answer. If $p$ is any odd
prime number (i.e., any prime number $>2$), then the Gauss
sum is defined to be the
number
begin{equation}
gleft( 1;pright) :=sum_{n=0}^{p-1}e^{2pi in^{2}/p}.
end{equation}

Gauss proved that
begin{equation}
gleft( 1;pright) =
begin{cases}
sqrt{p}, & text{if }pequiv1operatorname{mod}4;\
isqrt{p}, & text{if }pequiv3operatorname{mod}4
end{cases}
end{equation}

(and this has been re-proven many times since Gauss; see a post by David
Speyer on
SBSeminar
for my favorite proof, although he denotes $gleft( 1;pright) $ by
$gleft( zetaright) $ and defines it somewhat differently).



Applying this to $p=5$, we obtain $gleft( 1;5right) =sqrt{5}$ (since
$5equiv1operatorname{mod}4$). Hence,
begin{align*}
sqrt{5} & =gleft( 1;5right) =sum_{n=0}^{4}e^{2pi in^{2}/5}=e^{2pi
icdot0^{2}/5}+e^{2pi icdot1^{2}/5}+e^{2pi icdot2^{2}/5}+e^{2pi
icdot3^{2}/5}+e^{2pi icdot4^{2}/5}\
& =z^{0^{2}}+z^{1^{2}}+z^{2^{2}}+z^{3^{2}}+z^{4^{2}},qquadtext{where
}z=e^{2pi i/5}.
end{align*}

This is, of course, a polynomial in $e^{2pi i/5}$ over $mathbb{Z}$. Hence,
your first question is answered.



To your second question: Let $K$ be a field. We shall show that if $x^{2}-5$
has no solution in $K$, then $x^{5}-1$ has no non-trivial solution in $K$.



Indeed, let us prove the contrapositive: Let us prove that if $x^{5}-1$ has a
non-trivial solution in $K$, then $x^{2}-5$ has a solution in $K$.



So we assume that $x^{5}-1$ has a non-trivial solution in $K$. Fix such a
solution, and denote it by $z$. Thus, $z^{5}-1=0$ but $zneq1$.



Inspired by the above answer to the first question, we set $w=z^{0^{2}
}+z^{1^{2}}+z^{2^{2}}+z^{3^{2}}+z^{4^{2}}$
. We shall now prove that
$w^{2}-5=0$.



Indeed, $z-1neq0$ (since $zneq1$). Hence, we can cancel $z-1$ from the
equality $left( z-1right) left( z^{4}+z^{3}+z^{2}+z+1right)
=z^{5}-1=0$
. We thus obtain $z^{4}+z^{3}+z^{2}+z+1=0$, so that $z^{4}
=-z^{3}-z^{2}-z-1$
. Also, from $z^{5}-1=0$, we obtain $z^{5}=1$, thus
$z^{8}=z^{3}$ and $z^{9}=z^{4}$ and $z^{16}=z^{11}=z^{6}=z$. Hence,
begin{align*}
w & =underbrace{z^{0^{2}}}_{=z^{0}=1}+underbrace{z^{1^{2}}}_{=z^{1}
=z}+underbrace{z^{2^{2}}}_{=z^{4}}+underbrace{z^{3^{2}}}_{=z^{9}=z^{4}
}+underbrace{z^{4^{2}}}_{=z^{16}=z}\
& =1+z+z^{4}+z^{4}+z=1+2z+2z^{4}.
end{align*}

Squaring this equality, we find
begin{align*}
w^{2} & =left( 1+2z+2z^{4}right) ^{2}=1+4z+4z^{2}+4z^{4}
+8underbrace{z^{5}}_{=1}+4underbrace{z^{8}}_{=z^{3}}\
& =1+4z+4z^{2}+4z^{4}+8+4z^{3}=5+4underbrace{left( z^{4}+z^{3}
+z^{2}+z+1right) }_{=0}=5.
end{align*}

In other words, $w^{2}-5=0$. Hence, $x^{2}-5$ has a solution in $K$ (namely,
$w$). This answers the second question.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



To your first question: Here is a high-faluting answer. If $p$ is any odd
prime number (i.e., any prime number $>2$), then the Gauss
sum is defined to be the
number
begin{equation}
gleft( 1;pright) :=sum_{n=0}^{p-1}e^{2pi in^{2}/p}.
end{equation}

Gauss proved that
begin{equation}
gleft( 1;pright) =
begin{cases}
sqrt{p}, & text{if }pequiv1operatorname{mod}4;\
isqrt{p}, & text{if }pequiv3operatorname{mod}4
end{cases}
end{equation}

(and this has been re-proven many times since Gauss; see a post by David
Speyer on
SBSeminar
for my favorite proof, although he denotes $gleft( 1;pright) $ by
$gleft( zetaright) $ and defines it somewhat differently).



Applying this to $p=5$, we obtain $gleft( 1;5right) =sqrt{5}$ (since
$5equiv1operatorname{mod}4$). Hence,
begin{align*}
sqrt{5} & =gleft( 1;5right) =sum_{n=0}^{4}e^{2pi in^{2}/5}=e^{2pi
icdot0^{2}/5}+e^{2pi icdot1^{2}/5}+e^{2pi icdot2^{2}/5}+e^{2pi
icdot3^{2}/5}+e^{2pi icdot4^{2}/5}\
& =z^{0^{2}}+z^{1^{2}}+z^{2^{2}}+z^{3^{2}}+z^{4^{2}},qquadtext{where
}z=e^{2pi i/5}.
end{align*}

This is, of course, a polynomial in $e^{2pi i/5}$ over $mathbb{Z}$. Hence,
your first question is answered.



To your second question: Let $K$ be a field. We shall show that if $x^{2}-5$
has no solution in $K$, then $x^{5}-1$ has no non-trivial solution in $K$.



Indeed, let us prove the contrapositive: Let us prove that if $x^{5}-1$ has a
non-trivial solution in $K$, then $x^{2}-5$ has a solution in $K$.



So we assume that $x^{5}-1$ has a non-trivial solution in $K$. Fix such a
solution, and denote it by $z$. Thus, $z^{5}-1=0$ but $zneq1$.



Inspired by the above answer to the first question, we set $w=z^{0^{2}
}+z^{1^{2}}+z^{2^{2}}+z^{3^{2}}+z^{4^{2}}$
. We shall now prove that
$w^{2}-5=0$.



Indeed, $z-1neq0$ (since $zneq1$). Hence, we can cancel $z-1$ from the
equality $left( z-1right) left( z^{4}+z^{3}+z^{2}+z+1right)
=z^{5}-1=0$
. We thus obtain $z^{4}+z^{3}+z^{2}+z+1=0$, so that $z^{4}
=-z^{3}-z^{2}-z-1$
. Also, from $z^{5}-1=0$, we obtain $z^{5}=1$, thus
$z^{8}=z^{3}$ and $z^{9}=z^{4}$ and $z^{16}=z^{11}=z^{6}=z$. Hence,
begin{align*}
w & =underbrace{z^{0^{2}}}_{=z^{0}=1}+underbrace{z^{1^{2}}}_{=z^{1}
=z}+underbrace{z^{2^{2}}}_{=z^{4}}+underbrace{z^{3^{2}}}_{=z^{9}=z^{4}
}+underbrace{z^{4^{2}}}_{=z^{16}=z}\
& =1+z+z^{4}+z^{4}+z=1+2z+2z^{4}.
end{align*}

Squaring this equality, we find
begin{align*}
w^{2} & =left( 1+2z+2z^{4}right) ^{2}=1+4z+4z^{2}+4z^{4}
+8underbrace{z^{5}}_{=1}+4underbrace{z^{8}}_{=z^{3}}\
& =1+4z+4z^{2}+4z^{4}+8+4z^{3}=5+4underbrace{left( z^{4}+z^{3}
+z^{2}+z+1right) }_{=0}=5.
end{align*}

In other words, $w^{2}-5=0$. Hence, $x^{2}-5$ has a solution in $K$ (namely,
$w$). This answers the second question.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 26 '18 at 3:32









darij grinbergdarij grinberg

10.5k33062




10.5k33062












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the answer
    $endgroup$
    – Join_PhD
    Nov 26 '18 at 4:06


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the answer
    $endgroup$
    – Join_PhD
    Nov 26 '18 at 4:06
















$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the answer
$endgroup$
– Join_PhD
Nov 26 '18 at 4:06




$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the answer
$endgroup$
– Join_PhD
Nov 26 '18 at 4:06











2












$begingroup$

Let $w neq 1$ be a 5th root of unity in the first quadrant. Take $x = w + frac{1}{w} = w + w^4.$ Then
$x^2 = w^2 + 2 + frac{1}{w^2}.$ So,
$$ x^2 + x - 1 = w^2 + w + 1 + frac{1}{w} + frac{1}{w^2 } = 0. $$
As $x>0$ we have
$$ x = frac{-1 + sqrt 5}{2} $$
Then $$ 2x + 1 = sqrt 5 $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much
    $endgroup$
    – Join_PhD
    Nov 26 '18 at 4:06
















2












$begingroup$

Let $w neq 1$ be a 5th root of unity in the first quadrant. Take $x = w + frac{1}{w} = w + w^4.$ Then
$x^2 = w^2 + 2 + frac{1}{w^2}.$ So,
$$ x^2 + x - 1 = w^2 + w + 1 + frac{1}{w} + frac{1}{w^2 } = 0. $$
As $x>0$ we have
$$ x = frac{-1 + sqrt 5}{2} $$
Then $$ 2x + 1 = sqrt 5 $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much
    $endgroup$
    – Join_PhD
    Nov 26 '18 at 4:06














2












2








2





$begingroup$

Let $w neq 1$ be a 5th root of unity in the first quadrant. Take $x = w + frac{1}{w} = w + w^4.$ Then
$x^2 = w^2 + 2 + frac{1}{w^2}.$ So,
$$ x^2 + x - 1 = w^2 + w + 1 + frac{1}{w} + frac{1}{w^2 } = 0. $$
As $x>0$ we have
$$ x = frac{-1 + sqrt 5}{2} $$
Then $$ 2x + 1 = sqrt 5 $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Let $w neq 1$ be a 5th root of unity in the first quadrant. Take $x = w + frac{1}{w} = w + w^4.$ Then
$x^2 = w^2 + 2 + frac{1}{w^2}.$ So,
$$ x^2 + x - 1 = w^2 + w + 1 + frac{1}{w} + frac{1}{w^2 } = 0. $$
As $x>0$ we have
$$ x = frac{-1 + sqrt 5}{2} $$
Then $$ 2x + 1 = sqrt 5 $$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 26 '18 at 3:20









Will JagyWill Jagy

102k5101199




102k5101199












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much
    $endgroup$
    – Join_PhD
    Nov 26 '18 at 4:06


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much
    $endgroup$
    – Join_PhD
    Nov 26 '18 at 4:06
















$begingroup$
Thank you very much
$endgroup$
– Join_PhD
Nov 26 '18 at 4:06




$begingroup$
Thank you very much
$endgroup$
– Join_PhD
Nov 26 '18 at 4:06


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013766%2fshow-that-sqrt-5-can-be-expressed-as-a-polynomial-in-e2-pi-i-5-over-bb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?