To have no pagebreak before Bibliography











up vote
28
down vote

favorite
7












The position of Bibliography section is defined by document class, report class is a new page, some articles class no has page break.



How change this witout change the class of the document? So i have a report class but how generate Bibliography without page break.










share|improve this question
























  • You can check the report source code, find the macro placing the bibliography, and use renewcommand in your preamble to remove the call to pagebreak or similar.
    – T. Verron
    Sep 27 '12 at 4:28










  • So you want your bibliography to show like a section instead of like a chapter?
    – Gonzalo Medina
    Sep 27 '12 at 4:31










  • @GonzaloMedina yes, rigth
    – white-shy-guy
    Sep 27 '12 at 4:32















up vote
28
down vote

favorite
7












The position of Bibliography section is defined by document class, report class is a new page, some articles class no has page break.



How change this witout change the class of the document? So i have a report class but how generate Bibliography without page break.










share|improve this question
























  • You can check the report source code, find the macro placing the bibliography, and use renewcommand in your preamble to remove the call to pagebreak or similar.
    – T. Verron
    Sep 27 '12 at 4:28










  • So you want your bibliography to show like a section instead of like a chapter?
    – Gonzalo Medina
    Sep 27 '12 at 4:31










  • @GonzaloMedina yes, rigth
    – white-shy-guy
    Sep 27 '12 at 4:32













up vote
28
down vote

favorite
7









up vote
28
down vote

favorite
7






7





The position of Bibliography section is defined by document class, report class is a new page, some articles class no has page break.



How change this witout change the class of the document? So i have a report class but how generate Bibliography without page break.










share|improve this question















The position of Bibliography section is defined by document class, report class is a new page, some articles class no has page break.



How change this witout change the class of the document? So i have a report class but how generate Bibliography without page break.







bibliographies page-breaking






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 27 '12 at 7:31









lockstep

189k52585719




189k52585719










asked Sep 27 '12 at 4:25









white-shy-guy

295247




295247












  • You can check the report source code, find the macro placing the bibliography, and use renewcommand in your preamble to remove the call to pagebreak or similar.
    – T. Verron
    Sep 27 '12 at 4:28










  • So you want your bibliography to show like a section instead of like a chapter?
    – Gonzalo Medina
    Sep 27 '12 at 4:31










  • @GonzaloMedina yes, rigth
    – white-shy-guy
    Sep 27 '12 at 4:32


















  • You can check the report source code, find the macro placing the bibliography, and use renewcommand in your preamble to remove the call to pagebreak or similar.
    – T. Verron
    Sep 27 '12 at 4:28










  • So you want your bibliography to show like a section instead of like a chapter?
    – Gonzalo Medina
    Sep 27 '12 at 4:31










  • @GonzaloMedina yes, rigth
    – white-shy-guy
    Sep 27 '12 at 4:32
















You can check the report source code, find the macro placing the bibliography, and use renewcommand in your preamble to remove the call to pagebreak or similar.
– T. Verron
Sep 27 '12 at 4:28




You can check the report source code, find the macro placing the bibliography, and use renewcommand in your preamble to remove the call to pagebreak or similar.
– T. Verron
Sep 27 '12 at 4:28












So you want your bibliography to show like a section instead of like a chapter?
– Gonzalo Medina
Sep 27 '12 at 4:31




So you want your bibliography to show like a section instead of like a chapter?
– Gonzalo Medina
Sep 27 '12 at 4:31












@GonzaloMedina yes, rigth
– white-shy-guy
Sep 27 '12 at 4:32




@GonzaloMedina yes, rigth
– white-shy-guy
Sep 27 '12 at 4:32










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
26
down vote



accepted










Internally, thebibliography environment uses chapter*; if you want the bibliography to behave like a section, you can patch the thebibliography command to use section* instead of chapter*. To do this, add the following lines to the preamble:



usepackage{etoolbox}
patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}


A complete example:



documentclass{report}
usepackage{etoolbox}
usepackage{lipsum}% just to generate text for the example

patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}

begin{document}

lipsum[1]

begin{thebibliography}{9}
bibitem{a} Test A.
end{thebibliography}

end{document}


enter image description here



If the biblatex package is used to produce the bibliography, one can use defbibheading to define a heading using section*:



documentclass{report}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{biblatex}

addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
defbibheading{secbib}[bibname]{%
section*{#1}%
markboth{#1}{#1}}

begin{document}

lipsum[1]
nocite{*}

printbibliography[heading=secbib]

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • I there a way to do the same thing if I am using bibtex (not biblatex)?
    – Seeda
    Sep 17 '17 at 0:44


















up vote
14
down vote













If you are using the natbib package, you may try the option sectionbib:



usepackage[sectionbib]{natbib}






share|improve this answer

















  • 2




    This is so much simpler than the top answer 😝
    – Yan King Yin
    Jun 13 '17 at 14:38








  • 1




    Solved a similar issue with the bibentry package
    – Heather Turner
    Nov 9 at 15:41


















up vote
6
down vote













If the biblatex package is used to produce the bibliography, you can also use one of the predefined headings, i.e. subbibliography



You can refer to section 3.6.8 Bibliography Headings and Environments in the biblatex manual.






share|improve this answer

















  • 3




    This works like a charm, n.b. the actual command is printbibliography[heading=subbibliography]
    – Mr. Tao
    Jul 27 at 0:30


















up vote
2
down vote













bilatex package is useful and very easy in such case. Suppose,





  1. You want a section inside document as well as an un-numbered section entry in table of contents, then use



    printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section



  2. You just want a section inside document and no entry in table of contents, then use



    printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC



An MWE, borrowed from Gonzalo Medina's answer would be like this:



documentclass{report}
usepackage{lipsum}
usepackage{biblatex}
addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}

begin{document}
tableofcontents
lipsum[1]
nocite{*}
% un-comment any one from the following as per your choice
%printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC
%printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section
end{document}





share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    I removed the definition of secbib that remained in the copy of Gonzalo's MWE, it was not used here and would probably only confuse people.
    – moewe
    Nov 30 at 12:04






  • 1




    FWIW I think this use of subbibliography or subbibintoc (or subbibnumbered) is generally slightly nicer than a new heading definition such as secbib in simple cases. But in more complicated case a new definition might be inevitable.
    – moewe
    Nov 30 at 12:05


















up vote
0
down vote













FWIW, when using the llncs class together with the natbib package, one gets a bibliography on a separate page, listing reference indexed as [1], [2]... instead of 1., 2.... as expected by LNCS.



To avoid that problem, I use:



usepackage[numbers]{natbib}
% Hack natbib so it matches the LNCS style: reference list in a
% section with small font and no square brackets.
renewcommandbibsection
{section*{refname}smallrenewcommandbibnumfmt[1]{##1.}}





share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f74296%2fto-have-no-pagebreak-before-bibliography%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    26
    down vote



    accepted










    Internally, thebibliography environment uses chapter*; if you want the bibliography to behave like a section, you can patch the thebibliography command to use section* instead of chapter*. To do this, add the following lines to the preamble:



    usepackage{etoolbox}
    patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}


    A complete example:



    documentclass{report}
    usepackage{etoolbox}
    usepackage{lipsum}% just to generate text for the example

    patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}

    begin{document}

    lipsum[1]

    begin{thebibliography}{9}
    bibitem{a} Test A.
    end{thebibliography}

    end{document}


    enter image description here



    If the biblatex package is used to produce the bibliography, one can use defbibheading to define a heading using section*:



    documentclass{report}
    usepackage{lipsum}
    usepackage{biblatex}

    addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
    defbibheading{secbib}[bibname]{%
    section*{#1}%
    markboth{#1}{#1}}

    begin{document}

    lipsum[1]
    nocite{*}

    printbibliography[heading=secbib]

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer























    • I there a way to do the same thing if I am using bibtex (not biblatex)?
      – Seeda
      Sep 17 '17 at 0:44















    up vote
    26
    down vote



    accepted










    Internally, thebibliography environment uses chapter*; if you want the bibliography to behave like a section, you can patch the thebibliography command to use section* instead of chapter*. To do this, add the following lines to the preamble:



    usepackage{etoolbox}
    patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}


    A complete example:



    documentclass{report}
    usepackage{etoolbox}
    usepackage{lipsum}% just to generate text for the example

    patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}

    begin{document}

    lipsum[1]

    begin{thebibliography}{9}
    bibitem{a} Test A.
    end{thebibliography}

    end{document}


    enter image description here



    If the biblatex package is used to produce the bibliography, one can use defbibheading to define a heading using section*:



    documentclass{report}
    usepackage{lipsum}
    usepackage{biblatex}

    addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
    defbibheading{secbib}[bibname]{%
    section*{#1}%
    markboth{#1}{#1}}

    begin{document}

    lipsum[1]
    nocite{*}

    printbibliography[heading=secbib]

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer























    • I there a way to do the same thing if I am using bibtex (not biblatex)?
      – Seeda
      Sep 17 '17 at 0:44













    up vote
    26
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    26
    down vote



    accepted






    Internally, thebibliography environment uses chapter*; if you want the bibliography to behave like a section, you can patch the thebibliography command to use section* instead of chapter*. To do this, add the following lines to the preamble:



    usepackage{etoolbox}
    patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}


    A complete example:



    documentclass{report}
    usepackage{etoolbox}
    usepackage{lipsum}% just to generate text for the example

    patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}

    begin{document}

    lipsum[1]

    begin{thebibliography}{9}
    bibitem{a} Test A.
    end{thebibliography}

    end{document}


    enter image description here



    If the biblatex package is used to produce the bibliography, one can use defbibheading to define a heading using section*:



    documentclass{report}
    usepackage{lipsum}
    usepackage{biblatex}

    addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
    defbibheading{secbib}[bibname]{%
    section*{#1}%
    markboth{#1}{#1}}

    begin{document}

    lipsum[1]
    nocite{*}

    printbibliography[heading=secbib]

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer














    Internally, thebibliography environment uses chapter*; if you want the bibliography to behave like a section, you can patch the thebibliography command to use section* instead of chapter*. To do this, add the following lines to the preamble:



    usepackage{etoolbox}
    patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}


    A complete example:



    documentclass{report}
    usepackage{etoolbox}
    usepackage{lipsum}% just to generate text for the example

    patchcmd{thebibliography}{chapter*}{section*}{}{}

    begin{document}

    lipsum[1]

    begin{thebibliography}{9}
    bibitem{a} Test A.
    end{thebibliography}

    end{document}


    enter image description here



    If the biblatex package is used to produce the bibliography, one can use defbibheading to define a heading using section*:



    documentclass{report}
    usepackage{lipsum}
    usepackage{biblatex}

    addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
    defbibheading{secbib}[bibname]{%
    section*{#1}%
    markboth{#1}{#1}}

    begin{document}

    lipsum[1]
    nocite{*}

    printbibliography[heading=secbib]

    end{document}


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Sep 27 '12 at 4:57

























    answered Sep 27 '12 at 4:37









    Gonzalo Medina

    394k4012921558




    394k4012921558












    • I there a way to do the same thing if I am using bibtex (not biblatex)?
      – Seeda
      Sep 17 '17 at 0:44


















    • I there a way to do the same thing if I am using bibtex (not biblatex)?
      – Seeda
      Sep 17 '17 at 0:44
















    I there a way to do the same thing if I am using bibtex (not biblatex)?
    – Seeda
    Sep 17 '17 at 0:44




    I there a way to do the same thing if I am using bibtex (not biblatex)?
    – Seeda
    Sep 17 '17 at 0:44










    up vote
    14
    down vote













    If you are using the natbib package, you may try the option sectionbib:



    usepackage[sectionbib]{natbib}






    share|improve this answer

















    • 2




      This is so much simpler than the top answer 😝
      – Yan King Yin
      Jun 13 '17 at 14:38








    • 1




      Solved a similar issue with the bibentry package
      – Heather Turner
      Nov 9 at 15:41















    up vote
    14
    down vote













    If you are using the natbib package, you may try the option sectionbib:



    usepackage[sectionbib]{natbib}






    share|improve this answer

















    • 2




      This is so much simpler than the top answer 😝
      – Yan King Yin
      Jun 13 '17 at 14:38








    • 1




      Solved a similar issue with the bibentry package
      – Heather Turner
      Nov 9 at 15:41













    up vote
    14
    down vote










    up vote
    14
    down vote









    If you are using the natbib package, you may try the option sectionbib:



    usepackage[sectionbib]{natbib}






    share|improve this answer












    If you are using the natbib package, you may try the option sectionbib:



    usepackage[sectionbib]{natbib}







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jul 12 '16 at 13:23









    Björn

    24123




    24123








    • 2




      This is so much simpler than the top answer 😝
      – Yan King Yin
      Jun 13 '17 at 14:38








    • 1




      Solved a similar issue with the bibentry package
      – Heather Turner
      Nov 9 at 15:41














    • 2




      This is so much simpler than the top answer 😝
      – Yan King Yin
      Jun 13 '17 at 14:38








    • 1




      Solved a similar issue with the bibentry package
      – Heather Turner
      Nov 9 at 15:41








    2




    2




    This is so much simpler than the top answer 😝
    – Yan King Yin
    Jun 13 '17 at 14:38






    This is so much simpler than the top answer 😝
    – Yan King Yin
    Jun 13 '17 at 14:38






    1




    1




    Solved a similar issue with the bibentry package
    – Heather Turner
    Nov 9 at 15:41




    Solved a similar issue with the bibentry package
    – Heather Turner
    Nov 9 at 15:41










    up vote
    6
    down vote













    If the biblatex package is used to produce the bibliography, you can also use one of the predefined headings, i.e. subbibliography



    You can refer to section 3.6.8 Bibliography Headings and Environments in the biblatex manual.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 3




      This works like a charm, n.b. the actual command is printbibliography[heading=subbibliography]
      – Mr. Tao
      Jul 27 at 0:30















    up vote
    6
    down vote













    If the biblatex package is used to produce the bibliography, you can also use one of the predefined headings, i.e. subbibliography



    You can refer to section 3.6.8 Bibliography Headings and Environments in the biblatex manual.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 3




      This works like a charm, n.b. the actual command is printbibliography[heading=subbibliography]
      – Mr. Tao
      Jul 27 at 0:30













    up vote
    6
    down vote










    up vote
    6
    down vote









    If the biblatex package is used to produce the bibliography, you can also use one of the predefined headings, i.e. subbibliography



    You can refer to section 3.6.8 Bibliography Headings and Environments in the biblatex manual.






    share|improve this answer












    If the biblatex package is used to produce the bibliography, you can also use one of the predefined headings, i.e. subbibliography



    You can refer to section 3.6.8 Bibliography Headings and Environments in the biblatex manual.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Nov 24 '14 at 20:35









    zakkak

    25237




    25237








    • 3




      This works like a charm, n.b. the actual command is printbibliography[heading=subbibliography]
      – Mr. Tao
      Jul 27 at 0:30














    • 3




      This works like a charm, n.b. the actual command is printbibliography[heading=subbibliography]
      – Mr. Tao
      Jul 27 at 0:30








    3




    3




    This works like a charm, n.b. the actual command is printbibliography[heading=subbibliography]
    – Mr. Tao
    Jul 27 at 0:30




    This works like a charm, n.b. the actual command is printbibliography[heading=subbibliography]
    – Mr. Tao
    Jul 27 at 0:30










    up vote
    2
    down vote













    bilatex package is useful and very easy in such case. Suppose,





    1. You want a section inside document as well as an un-numbered section entry in table of contents, then use



      printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section



    2. You just want a section inside document and no entry in table of contents, then use



      printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC



    An MWE, borrowed from Gonzalo Medina's answer would be like this:



    documentclass{report}
    usepackage{lipsum}
    usepackage{biblatex}
    addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}

    begin{document}
    tableofcontents
    lipsum[1]
    nocite{*}
    % un-comment any one from the following as per your choice
    %printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC
    %printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section
    end{document}





    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      I removed the definition of secbib that remained in the copy of Gonzalo's MWE, it was not used here and would probably only confuse people.
      – moewe
      Nov 30 at 12:04






    • 1




      FWIW I think this use of subbibliography or subbibintoc (or subbibnumbered) is generally slightly nicer than a new heading definition such as secbib in simple cases. But in more complicated case a new definition might be inevitable.
      – moewe
      Nov 30 at 12:05















    up vote
    2
    down vote













    bilatex package is useful and very easy in such case. Suppose,





    1. You want a section inside document as well as an un-numbered section entry in table of contents, then use



      printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section



    2. You just want a section inside document and no entry in table of contents, then use



      printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC



    An MWE, borrowed from Gonzalo Medina's answer would be like this:



    documentclass{report}
    usepackage{lipsum}
    usepackage{biblatex}
    addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}

    begin{document}
    tableofcontents
    lipsum[1]
    nocite{*}
    % un-comment any one from the following as per your choice
    %printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC
    %printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section
    end{document}





    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      I removed the definition of secbib that remained in the copy of Gonzalo's MWE, it was not used here and would probably only confuse people.
      – moewe
      Nov 30 at 12:04






    • 1




      FWIW I think this use of subbibliography or subbibintoc (or subbibnumbered) is generally slightly nicer than a new heading definition such as secbib in simple cases. But in more complicated case a new definition might be inevitable.
      – moewe
      Nov 30 at 12:05













    up vote
    2
    down vote










    up vote
    2
    down vote









    bilatex package is useful and very easy in such case. Suppose,





    1. You want a section inside document as well as an un-numbered section entry in table of contents, then use



      printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section



    2. You just want a section inside document and no entry in table of contents, then use



      printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC



    An MWE, borrowed from Gonzalo Medina's answer would be like this:



    documentclass{report}
    usepackage{lipsum}
    usepackage{biblatex}
    addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}

    begin{document}
    tableofcontents
    lipsum[1]
    nocite{*}
    % un-comment any one from the following as per your choice
    %printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC
    %printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section
    end{document}





    share|improve this answer














    bilatex package is useful and very easy in such case. Suppose,





    1. You want a section inside document as well as an un-numbered section entry in table of contents, then use



      printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section



    2. You just want a section inside document and no entry in table of contents, then use



      printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC



    An MWE, borrowed from Gonzalo Medina's answer would be like this:



    documentclass{report}
    usepackage{lipsum}
    usepackage{biblatex}
    addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}

    begin{document}
    tableofcontents
    lipsum[1]
    nocite{*}
    % un-comment any one from the following as per your choice
    %printbibliography[heading=subbibliography,] % No entry in TOC
    %printbibliography[heading=subbibintoc,] % TOC has an entry 'References' as an un-numbered section
    end{document}






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 30 at 12:03









    moewe

    84.1k9107322




    84.1k9107322










    answered Nov 30 at 11:29









    Wings

    469




    469








    • 1




      I removed the definition of secbib that remained in the copy of Gonzalo's MWE, it was not used here and would probably only confuse people.
      – moewe
      Nov 30 at 12:04






    • 1




      FWIW I think this use of subbibliography or subbibintoc (or subbibnumbered) is generally slightly nicer than a new heading definition such as secbib in simple cases. But in more complicated case a new definition might be inevitable.
      – moewe
      Nov 30 at 12:05














    • 1




      I removed the definition of secbib that remained in the copy of Gonzalo's MWE, it was not used here and would probably only confuse people.
      – moewe
      Nov 30 at 12:04






    • 1




      FWIW I think this use of subbibliography or subbibintoc (or subbibnumbered) is generally slightly nicer than a new heading definition such as secbib in simple cases. But in more complicated case a new definition might be inevitable.
      – moewe
      Nov 30 at 12:05








    1




    1




    I removed the definition of secbib that remained in the copy of Gonzalo's MWE, it was not used here and would probably only confuse people.
    – moewe
    Nov 30 at 12:04




    I removed the definition of secbib that remained in the copy of Gonzalo's MWE, it was not used here and would probably only confuse people.
    – moewe
    Nov 30 at 12:04




    1




    1




    FWIW I think this use of subbibliography or subbibintoc (or subbibnumbered) is generally slightly nicer than a new heading definition such as secbib in simple cases. But in more complicated case a new definition might be inevitable.
    – moewe
    Nov 30 at 12:05




    FWIW I think this use of subbibliography or subbibintoc (or subbibnumbered) is generally slightly nicer than a new heading definition such as secbib in simple cases. But in more complicated case a new definition might be inevitable.
    – moewe
    Nov 30 at 12:05










    up vote
    0
    down vote













    FWIW, when using the llncs class together with the natbib package, one gets a bibliography on a separate page, listing reference indexed as [1], [2]... instead of 1., 2.... as expected by LNCS.



    To avoid that problem, I use:



    usepackage[numbers]{natbib}
    % Hack natbib so it matches the LNCS style: reference list in a
    % section with small font and no square brackets.
    renewcommandbibsection
    {section*{refname}smallrenewcommandbibnumfmt[1]{##1.}}





    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      FWIW, when using the llncs class together with the natbib package, one gets a bibliography on a separate page, listing reference indexed as [1], [2]... instead of 1., 2.... as expected by LNCS.



      To avoid that problem, I use:



      usepackage[numbers]{natbib}
      % Hack natbib so it matches the LNCS style: reference list in a
      % section with small font and no square brackets.
      renewcommandbibsection
      {section*{refname}smallrenewcommandbibnumfmt[1]{##1.}}





      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        FWIW, when using the llncs class together with the natbib package, one gets a bibliography on a separate page, listing reference indexed as [1], [2]... instead of 1., 2.... as expected by LNCS.



        To avoid that problem, I use:



        usepackage[numbers]{natbib}
        % Hack natbib so it matches the LNCS style: reference list in a
        % section with small font and no square brackets.
        renewcommandbibsection
        {section*{refname}smallrenewcommandbibnumfmt[1]{##1.}}





        share|improve this answer












        FWIW, when using the llncs class together with the natbib package, one gets a bibliography on a separate page, listing reference indexed as [1], [2]... instead of 1., 2.... as expected by LNCS.



        To avoid that problem, I use:



        usepackage[numbers]{natbib}
        % Hack natbib so it matches the LNCS style: reference list in a
        % section with small font and no square brackets.
        renewcommandbibsection
        {section*{refname}smallrenewcommandbibnumfmt[1]{##1.}}






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 1 '16 at 12:55









        akim

        25718




        25718






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f74296%2fto-have-no-pagebreak-before-bibliography%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

            ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

            Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?