nuclear $C^*$ algebra











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
2












If $(A_i)$ is a sequence of nuclear $C^*$ algebras,Is $oplus_{c_0}A_i$ ($c_0$ direct sum)and $prod A_i$($ell ^infty $ direct sum) also nuclear?










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite
    2












    If $(A_i)$ is a sequence of nuclear $C^*$ algebras,Is $oplus_{c_0}A_i$ ($c_0$ direct sum)and $prod A_i$($ell ^infty $ direct sum) also nuclear?










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      2









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      2






      2





      If $(A_i)$ is a sequence of nuclear $C^*$ algebras,Is $oplus_{c_0}A_i$ ($c_0$ direct sum)and $prod A_i$($ell ^infty $ direct sum) also nuclear?










      share|cite|improve this question













      If $(A_i)$ is a sequence of nuclear $C^*$ algebras,Is $oplus_{c_0}A_i$ ($c_0$ direct sum)and $prod A_i$($ell ^infty $ direct sum) also nuclear?







      operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras von-neumann-algebras






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 19 at 3:31









      mathrookie

      772512




      772512






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Fix $ain bigoplus_nA_n$ and $varepsilon>0$. For each $n$, there exist ucp maps $varphi_n:A_nto M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)$ and $psi_varepsilon:M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to A_n$ such that $|psi_ncircvarphi_n(a_n)-a_n|<varepsilon$.
          There is also $m$ such that $|a_n|<varepsilon$ for all $ngeq m$. Write $a_0$ for the truncation of $a$ to its first $m$ entries; then $|a-a_0|<varepsilon$. Then the maps
          $$
          varphi:bigoplus_nA_nto bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C), psi:bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to bigoplus_nA_n
          $$

          given by $$varphi(b)=bigoplus_{n=1}^mvarphi_n(b_n), psi(bigoplus_{n=1}^m c_n)=bigoplus_{n=1}^m psi_n(c_n)$$
          satisfy
          begin{align}
          |psicircvarphi(a)-a|
          &leq|psicircvarphi(a)-psicircvarphi(a_0)|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|+|a_0-a|\ \
          &leq 2|a_0-a|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|<3varepsilon.
          end{align}

          By making this work over the finite sets $Fsubset bigoplus_nA_n$ we obtain net ${varphi_F}$ and ${psi_F}$ such that $|psi_Fcircvarphi_F(a)-a|to0$ for all $ain bigoplus_nA_n$.



          The diret product, on the other hand is not nuclear; it's not even exact. For instance $M=prod_n M_n(mathbb C)$ is not nuclear. It is well-known that nuclear algebras are exact, and that exactness passes to subalgebras. The full C$^*$-algebra of $mathbb F_2$ is known to be non-exact, and to be residually finite; this means that there exists a faithful representation $pi:C^*(mathbb F_2)to M=prod_nM_n(mathbb C)$. So $M$ cannot be exact, and in particular it is not nuclear.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • I made a mistake.I thought "exact" and "nuclear" were the same concept.nuclear implies exact,but exact cannot imply nuclear?
            – mathrookie
            Nov 19 at 4:46










          • Exsctly. $ $
            – Martin Argerami
            Nov 19 at 10:16










          • Do you mean "the universal $C^ast$ algebra of $mathbb F_2$", right? The reduced $C^ast$-algebra is exact and simple, therefore can not be residually finite.
            – Adrián González-Pérez
            Nov 20 at 12:49












          • @Adríán: indeed, thanks for noticing.
            – Martin Argerami
            Nov 20 at 15:36











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004484%2fnuclear-c-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Fix $ain bigoplus_nA_n$ and $varepsilon>0$. For each $n$, there exist ucp maps $varphi_n:A_nto M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)$ and $psi_varepsilon:M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to A_n$ such that $|psi_ncircvarphi_n(a_n)-a_n|<varepsilon$.
          There is also $m$ such that $|a_n|<varepsilon$ for all $ngeq m$. Write $a_0$ for the truncation of $a$ to its first $m$ entries; then $|a-a_0|<varepsilon$. Then the maps
          $$
          varphi:bigoplus_nA_nto bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C), psi:bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to bigoplus_nA_n
          $$

          given by $$varphi(b)=bigoplus_{n=1}^mvarphi_n(b_n), psi(bigoplus_{n=1}^m c_n)=bigoplus_{n=1}^m psi_n(c_n)$$
          satisfy
          begin{align}
          |psicircvarphi(a)-a|
          &leq|psicircvarphi(a)-psicircvarphi(a_0)|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|+|a_0-a|\ \
          &leq 2|a_0-a|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|<3varepsilon.
          end{align}

          By making this work over the finite sets $Fsubset bigoplus_nA_n$ we obtain net ${varphi_F}$ and ${psi_F}$ such that $|psi_Fcircvarphi_F(a)-a|to0$ for all $ain bigoplus_nA_n$.



          The diret product, on the other hand is not nuclear; it's not even exact. For instance $M=prod_n M_n(mathbb C)$ is not nuclear. It is well-known that nuclear algebras are exact, and that exactness passes to subalgebras. The full C$^*$-algebra of $mathbb F_2$ is known to be non-exact, and to be residually finite; this means that there exists a faithful representation $pi:C^*(mathbb F_2)to M=prod_nM_n(mathbb C)$. So $M$ cannot be exact, and in particular it is not nuclear.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • I made a mistake.I thought "exact" and "nuclear" were the same concept.nuclear implies exact,but exact cannot imply nuclear?
            – mathrookie
            Nov 19 at 4:46










          • Exsctly. $ $
            – Martin Argerami
            Nov 19 at 10:16










          • Do you mean "the universal $C^ast$ algebra of $mathbb F_2$", right? The reduced $C^ast$-algebra is exact and simple, therefore can not be residually finite.
            – Adrián González-Pérez
            Nov 20 at 12:49












          • @Adríán: indeed, thanks for noticing.
            – Martin Argerami
            Nov 20 at 15:36















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Fix $ain bigoplus_nA_n$ and $varepsilon>0$. For each $n$, there exist ucp maps $varphi_n:A_nto M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)$ and $psi_varepsilon:M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to A_n$ such that $|psi_ncircvarphi_n(a_n)-a_n|<varepsilon$.
          There is also $m$ such that $|a_n|<varepsilon$ for all $ngeq m$. Write $a_0$ for the truncation of $a$ to its first $m$ entries; then $|a-a_0|<varepsilon$. Then the maps
          $$
          varphi:bigoplus_nA_nto bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C), psi:bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to bigoplus_nA_n
          $$

          given by $$varphi(b)=bigoplus_{n=1}^mvarphi_n(b_n), psi(bigoplus_{n=1}^m c_n)=bigoplus_{n=1}^m psi_n(c_n)$$
          satisfy
          begin{align}
          |psicircvarphi(a)-a|
          &leq|psicircvarphi(a)-psicircvarphi(a_0)|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|+|a_0-a|\ \
          &leq 2|a_0-a|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|<3varepsilon.
          end{align}

          By making this work over the finite sets $Fsubset bigoplus_nA_n$ we obtain net ${varphi_F}$ and ${psi_F}$ such that $|psi_Fcircvarphi_F(a)-a|to0$ for all $ain bigoplus_nA_n$.



          The diret product, on the other hand is not nuclear; it's not even exact. For instance $M=prod_n M_n(mathbb C)$ is not nuclear. It is well-known that nuclear algebras are exact, and that exactness passes to subalgebras. The full C$^*$-algebra of $mathbb F_2$ is known to be non-exact, and to be residually finite; this means that there exists a faithful representation $pi:C^*(mathbb F_2)to M=prod_nM_n(mathbb C)$. So $M$ cannot be exact, and in particular it is not nuclear.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • I made a mistake.I thought "exact" and "nuclear" were the same concept.nuclear implies exact,but exact cannot imply nuclear?
            – mathrookie
            Nov 19 at 4:46










          • Exsctly. $ $
            – Martin Argerami
            Nov 19 at 10:16










          • Do you mean "the universal $C^ast$ algebra of $mathbb F_2$", right? The reduced $C^ast$-algebra is exact and simple, therefore can not be residually finite.
            – Adrián González-Pérez
            Nov 20 at 12:49












          • @Adríán: indeed, thanks for noticing.
            – Martin Argerami
            Nov 20 at 15:36













          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          Fix $ain bigoplus_nA_n$ and $varepsilon>0$. For each $n$, there exist ucp maps $varphi_n:A_nto M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)$ and $psi_varepsilon:M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to A_n$ such that $|psi_ncircvarphi_n(a_n)-a_n|<varepsilon$.
          There is also $m$ such that $|a_n|<varepsilon$ for all $ngeq m$. Write $a_0$ for the truncation of $a$ to its first $m$ entries; then $|a-a_0|<varepsilon$. Then the maps
          $$
          varphi:bigoplus_nA_nto bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C), psi:bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to bigoplus_nA_n
          $$

          given by $$varphi(b)=bigoplus_{n=1}^mvarphi_n(b_n), psi(bigoplus_{n=1}^m c_n)=bigoplus_{n=1}^m psi_n(c_n)$$
          satisfy
          begin{align}
          |psicircvarphi(a)-a|
          &leq|psicircvarphi(a)-psicircvarphi(a_0)|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|+|a_0-a|\ \
          &leq 2|a_0-a|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|<3varepsilon.
          end{align}

          By making this work over the finite sets $Fsubset bigoplus_nA_n$ we obtain net ${varphi_F}$ and ${psi_F}$ such that $|psi_Fcircvarphi_F(a)-a|to0$ for all $ain bigoplus_nA_n$.



          The diret product, on the other hand is not nuclear; it's not even exact. For instance $M=prod_n M_n(mathbb C)$ is not nuclear. It is well-known that nuclear algebras are exact, and that exactness passes to subalgebras. The full C$^*$-algebra of $mathbb F_2$ is known to be non-exact, and to be residually finite; this means that there exists a faithful representation $pi:C^*(mathbb F_2)to M=prod_nM_n(mathbb C)$. So $M$ cannot be exact, and in particular it is not nuclear.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Fix $ain bigoplus_nA_n$ and $varepsilon>0$. For each $n$, there exist ucp maps $varphi_n:A_nto M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)$ and $psi_varepsilon:M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to A_n$ such that $|psi_ncircvarphi_n(a_n)-a_n|<varepsilon$.
          There is also $m$ such that $|a_n|<varepsilon$ for all $ngeq m$. Write $a_0$ for the truncation of $a$ to its first $m$ entries; then $|a-a_0|<varepsilon$. Then the maps
          $$
          varphi:bigoplus_nA_nto bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C), psi:bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to bigoplus_nA_n
          $$

          given by $$varphi(b)=bigoplus_{n=1}^mvarphi_n(b_n), psi(bigoplus_{n=1}^m c_n)=bigoplus_{n=1}^m psi_n(c_n)$$
          satisfy
          begin{align}
          |psicircvarphi(a)-a|
          &leq|psicircvarphi(a)-psicircvarphi(a_0)|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|+|a_0-a|\ \
          &leq 2|a_0-a|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|<3varepsilon.
          end{align}

          By making this work over the finite sets $Fsubset bigoplus_nA_n$ we obtain net ${varphi_F}$ and ${psi_F}$ such that $|psi_Fcircvarphi_F(a)-a|to0$ for all $ain bigoplus_nA_n$.



          The diret product, on the other hand is not nuclear; it's not even exact. For instance $M=prod_n M_n(mathbb C)$ is not nuclear. It is well-known that nuclear algebras are exact, and that exactness passes to subalgebras. The full C$^*$-algebra of $mathbb F_2$ is known to be non-exact, and to be residually finite; this means that there exists a faithful representation $pi:C^*(mathbb F_2)to M=prod_nM_n(mathbb C)$. So $M$ cannot be exact, and in particular it is not nuclear.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 20 at 15:37

























          answered Nov 19 at 4:19









          Martin Argerami

          123k1176173




          123k1176173












          • I made a mistake.I thought "exact" and "nuclear" were the same concept.nuclear implies exact,but exact cannot imply nuclear?
            – mathrookie
            Nov 19 at 4:46










          • Exsctly. $ $
            – Martin Argerami
            Nov 19 at 10:16










          • Do you mean "the universal $C^ast$ algebra of $mathbb F_2$", right? The reduced $C^ast$-algebra is exact and simple, therefore can not be residually finite.
            – Adrián González-Pérez
            Nov 20 at 12:49












          • @Adríán: indeed, thanks for noticing.
            – Martin Argerami
            Nov 20 at 15:36


















          • I made a mistake.I thought "exact" and "nuclear" were the same concept.nuclear implies exact,but exact cannot imply nuclear?
            – mathrookie
            Nov 19 at 4:46










          • Exsctly. $ $
            – Martin Argerami
            Nov 19 at 10:16










          • Do you mean "the universal $C^ast$ algebra of $mathbb F_2$", right? The reduced $C^ast$-algebra is exact and simple, therefore can not be residually finite.
            – Adrián González-Pérez
            Nov 20 at 12:49












          • @Adríán: indeed, thanks for noticing.
            – Martin Argerami
            Nov 20 at 15:36
















          I made a mistake.I thought "exact" and "nuclear" were the same concept.nuclear implies exact,but exact cannot imply nuclear?
          – mathrookie
          Nov 19 at 4:46




          I made a mistake.I thought "exact" and "nuclear" were the same concept.nuclear implies exact,but exact cannot imply nuclear?
          – mathrookie
          Nov 19 at 4:46












          Exsctly. $ $
          – Martin Argerami
          Nov 19 at 10:16




          Exsctly. $ $
          – Martin Argerami
          Nov 19 at 10:16












          Do you mean "the universal $C^ast$ algebra of $mathbb F_2$", right? The reduced $C^ast$-algebra is exact and simple, therefore can not be residually finite.
          – Adrián González-Pérez
          Nov 20 at 12:49






          Do you mean "the universal $C^ast$ algebra of $mathbb F_2$", right? The reduced $C^ast$-algebra is exact and simple, therefore can not be residually finite.
          – Adrián González-Pérez
          Nov 20 at 12:49














          @Adríán: indeed, thanks for noticing.
          – Martin Argerami
          Nov 20 at 15:36




          @Adríán: indeed, thanks for noticing.
          – Martin Argerami
          Nov 20 at 15:36


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004484%2fnuclear-c-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

          ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

          Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?