If $f$ has Intermediate Value Property and is monotonic then $f$ is continous Proof Verification











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












The orignal question is to prove that-"If $f$ has Intermediate Value Property and is monotonic then $f$ is continous"



I was looking for a proof and here is a proof by fellow mathematician.




An $epsilon,delta$-proof:



Let $x_0 in (a,b)$ be arbitrary and let $epsilon > 0$. Let $s_1 = min(f(x_0)+epsilon/2, f(b))$. Then the number $f(x_0)+s_1$ satisfies $f(x_0) < f(x_0)+s_1 < f(x_0)+epsilon$. By the intermediate value property, there exists then some $delta_1 > 0$ such that $f(x_0 + delta_1) = f(x_0)+s_1$ (by the choice of $s_1 = min(f(x_0)+epsilon/2, f(b))$ we are guaranteed to stay within the domain of $f$). Similarly, let $s_2 = max(f(x_0)-epsilon/2, f(a))$ and find a $delta_2>0$ such that $f(x_0-delta_2) = f(x_0)-s_2$. Take $delta = min(delta_1,delta_2) > 0$.



Now consider the punctured neighbourhood $U_delta = {x in (a,b) : 0 < |x - x_0| < delta}$. Without loss of generality, we may assume that $f$ is increasing. Let $x in U_delta$ be arbitrary. If $x > x_0$ we have, as $f$ is increasing, $f(x_0) leq f(x) leq f(x_0+delta_1) = f(x_0)+s_1 < f(x_0)+epsilon$, whence $|f(x)-f(x_0)| < epsilon$. If $x < x_0$, we have, as $f$ is increasing, $f(x_0)-epsilon < f(x_0)-s_2 = f(x_0-delta_2) leq f(x) leq f(x_0)$, whence $|f(x)-f(x_0)| < epsilon$.



You can work out the proof for the endpoints as an exercise!




I cannot understand why $f(x_0)+s_1$ satisfies $f(x_0) < f(x_0)+s_1 < f(x_0)+epsilon$, If this is correct then $s_1<epsilon$



if $f(x_0)+epsilon/2 < f(b)$ then $s_1=f(x_0)+epsilon/2 < epsilon$
Hence $f(x_0)<epsilon$



What is wrong here.



Monotone and IVP










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Try defining $s_1 = min { epsilon/2, f(b) - f(x_0)}$ instead, and see if that helps.
    – Theo Bendit
    Nov 13 at 1:53















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












The orignal question is to prove that-"If $f$ has Intermediate Value Property and is monotonic then $f$ is continous"



I was looking for a proof and here is a proof by fellow mathematician.




An $epsilon,delta$-proof:



Let $x_0 in (a,b)$ be arbitrary and let $epsilon > 0$. Let $s_1 = min(f(x_0)+epsilon/2, f(b))$. Then the number $f(x_0)+s_1$ satisfies $f(x_0) < f(x_0)+s_1 < f(x_0)+epsilon$. By the intermediate value property, there exists then some $delta_1 > 0$ such that $f(x_0 + delta_1) = f(x_0)+s_1$ (by the choice of $s_1 = min(f(x_0)+epsilon/2, f(b))$ we are guaranteed to stay within the domain of $f$). Similarly, let $s_2 = max(f(x_0)-epsilon/2, f(a))$ and find a $delta_2>0$ such that $f(x_0-delta_2) = f(x_0)-s_2$. Take $delta = min(delta_1,delta_2) > 0$.



Now consider the punctured neighbourhood $U_delta = {x in (a,b) : 0 < |x - x_0| < delta}$. Without loss of generality, we may assume that $f$ is increasing. Let $x in U_delta$ be arbitrary. If $x > x_0$ we have, as $f$ is increasing, $f(x_0) leq f(x) leq f(x_0+delta_1) = f(x_0)+s_1 < f(x_0)+epsilon$, whence $|f(x)-f(x_0)| < epsilon$. If $x < x_0$, we have, as $f$ is increasing, $f(x_0)-epsilon < f(x_0)-s_2 = f(x_0-delta_2) leq f(x) leq f(x_0)$, whence $|f(x)-f(x_0)| < epsilon$.



You can work out the proof for the endpoints as an exercise!




I cannot understand why $f(x_0)+s_1$ satisfies $f(x_0) < f(x_0)+s_1 < f(x_0)+epsilon$, If this is correct then $s_1<epsilon$



if $f(x_0)+epsilon/2 < f(b)$ then $s_1=f(x_0)+epsilon/2 < epsilon$
Hence $f(x_0)<epsilon$



What is wrong here.



Monotone and IVP










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Try defining $s_1 = min { epsilon/2, f(b) - f(x_0)}$ instead, and see if that helps.
    – Theo Bendit
    Nov 13 at 1:53













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











The orignal question is to prove that-"If $f$ has Intermediate Value Property and is monotonic then $f$ is continous"



I was looking for a proof and here is a proof by fellow mathematician.




An $epsilon,delta$-proof:



Let $x_0 in (a,b)$ be arbitrary and let $epsilon > 0$. Let $s_1 = min(f(x_0)+epsilon/2, f(b))$. Then the number $f(x_0)+s_1$ satisfies $f(x_0) < f(x_0)+s_1 < f(x_0)+epsilon$. By the intermediate value property, there exists then some $delta_1 > 0$ such that $f(x_0 + delta_1) = f(x_0)+s_1$ (by the choice of $s_1 = min(f(x_0)+epsilon/2, f(b))$ we are guaranteed to stay within the domain of $f$). Similarly, let $s_2 = max(f(x_0)-epsilon/2, f(a))$ and find a $delta_2>0$ such that $f(x_0-delta_2) = f(x_0)-s_2$. Take $delta = min(delta_1,delta_2) > 0$.



Now consider the punctured neighbourhood $U_delta = {x in (a,b) : 0 < |x - x_0| < delta}$. Without loss of generality, we may assume that $f$ is increasing. Let $x in U_delta$ be arbitrary. If $x > x_0$ we have, as $f$ is increasing, $f(x_0) leq f(x) leq f(x_0+delta_1) = f(x_0)+s_1 < f(x_0)+epsilon$, whence $|f(x)-f(x_0)| < epsilon$. If $x < x_0$, we have, as $f$ is increasing, $f(x_0)-epsilon < f(x_0)-s_2 = f(x_0-delta_2) leq f(x) leq f(x_0)$, whence $|f(x)-f(x_0)| < epsilon$.



You can work out the proof for the endpoints as an exercise!




I cannot understand why $f(x_0)+s_1$ satisfies $f(x_0) < f(x_0)+s_1 < f(x_0)+epsilon$, If this is correct then $s_1<epsilon$



if $f(x_0)+epsilon/2 < f(b)$ then $s_1=f(x_0)+epsilon/2 < epsilon$
Hence $f(x_0)<epsilon$



What is wrong here.



Monotone and IVP










share|cite|improve this question













The orignal question is to prove that-"If $f$ has Intermediate Value Property and is monotonic then $f$ is continous"



I was looking for a proof and here is a proof by fellow mathematician.




An $epsilon,delta$-proof:



Let $x_0 in (a,b)$ be arbitrary and let $epsilon > 0$. Let $s_1 = min(f(x_0)+epsilon/2, f(b))$. Then the number $f(x_0)+s_1$ satisfies $f(x_0) < f(x_0)+s_1 < f(x_0)+epsilon$. By the intermediate value property, there exists then some $delta_1 > 0$ such that $f(x_0 + delta_1) = f(x_0)+s_1$ (by the choice of $s_1 = min(f(x_0)+epsilon/2, f(b))$ we are guaranteed to stay within the domain of $f$). Similarly, let $s_2 = max(f(x_0)-epsilon/2, f(a))$ and find a $delta_2>0$ such that $f(x_0-delta_2) = f(x_0)-s_2$. Take $delta = min(delta_1,delta_2) > 0$.



Now consider the punctured neighbourhood $U_delta = {x in (a,b) : 0 < |x - x_0| < delta}$. Without loss of generality, we may assume that $f$ is increasing. Let $x in U_delta$ be arbitrary. If $x > x_0$ we have, as $f$ is increasing, $f(x_0) leq f(x) leq f(x_0+delta_1) = f(x_0)+s_1 < f(x_0)+epsilon$, whence $|f(x)-f(x_0)| < epsilon$. If $x < x_0$, we have, as $f$ is increasing, $f(x_0)-epsilon < f(x_0)-s_2 = f(x_0-delta_2) leq f(x) leq f(x_0)$, whence $|f(x)-f(x_0)| < epsilon$.



You can work out the proof for the endpoints as an exercise!




I cannot understand why $f(x_0)+s_1$ satisfies $f(x_0) < f(x_0)+s_1 < f(x_0)+epsilon$, If this is correct then $s_1<epsilon$



if $f(x_0)+epsilon/2 < f(b)$ then $s_1=f(x_0)+epsilon/2 < epsilon$
Hence $f(x_0)<epsilon$



What is wrong here.



Monotone and IVP







real-analysis continuity






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 13 at 1:18









Rakesh Bhatt

673112




673112












  • Try defining $s_1 = min { epsilon/2, f(b) - f(x_0)}$ instead, and see if that helps.
    – Theo Bendit
    Nov 13 at 1:53


















  • Try defining $s_1 = min { epsilon/2, f(b) - f(x_0)}$ instead, and see if that helps.
    – Theo Bendit
    Nov 13 at 1:53
















Try defining $s_1 = min { epsilon/2, f(b) - f(x_0)}$ instead, and see if that helps.
– Theo Bendit
Nov 13 at 1:53




Try defining $s_1 = min { epsilon/2, f(b) - f(x_0)}$ instead, and see if that helps.
– Theo Bendit
Nov 13 at 1:53










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













The first paragraph as written is incorrect. Take $f(x)=x$ on $[0,1]$, $x_0=frac 12$ and $epsilon in (0,1/2)$. Then $f(x_0)+ s_1 = 1/2+1/2 + epsilon/2 > f(1)$.



Here is another approach. By monotonicity, the one-sided limits exist at all points, therefore only discontinuity is a jump discontinuity. A jump discontinuity contradicts the intermediate property.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2996149%2fif-f-has-intermediate-value-property-and-is-monotonic-then-f-is-continous-pr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote













    The first paragraph as written is incorrect. Take $f(x)=x$ on $[0,1]$, $x_0=frac 12$ and $epsilon in (0,1/2)$. Then $f(x_0)+ s_1 = 1/2+1/2 + epsilon/2 > f(1)$.



    Here is another approach. By monotonicity, the one-sided limits exist at all points, therefore only discontinuity is a jump discontinuity. A jump discontinuity contradicts the intermediate property.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      The first paragraph as written is incorrect. Take $f(x)=x$ on $[0,1]$, $x_0=frac 12$ and $epsilon in (0,1/2)$. Then $f(x_0)+ s_1 = 1/2+1/2 + epsilon/2 > f(1)$.



      Here is another approach. By monotonicity, the one-sided limits exist at all points, therefore only discontinuity is a jump discontinuity. A jump discontinuity contradicts the intermediate property.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        The first paragraph as written is incorrect. Take $f(x)=x$ on $[0,1]$, $x_0=frac 12$ and $epsilon in (0,1/2)$. Then $f(x_0)+ s_1 = 1/2+1/2 + epsilon/2 > f(1)$.



        Here is another approach. By monotonicity, the one-sided limits exist at all points, therefore only discontinuity is a jump discontinuity. A jump discontinuity contradicts the intermediate property.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        The first paragraph as written is incorrect. Take $f(x)=x$ on $[0,1]$, $x_0=frac 12$ and $epsilon in (0,1/2)$. Then $f(x_0)+ s_1 = 1/2+1/2 + epsilon/2 > f(1)$.



        Here is another approach. By monotonicity, the one-sided limits exist at all points, therefore only discontinuity is a jump discontinuity. A jump discontinuity contradicts the intermediate property.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 13 at 1:50









        Fnacool

        4,891511




        4,891511






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2996149%2fif-f-has-intermediate-value-property-and-is-monotonic-then-f-is-continous-pr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

            ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

            Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?