prove a polynomial has at least 2n-1 distinct real roots












6












$begingroup$


If $P(x)$ is a real polynomial has $n$ distinct real roots in $(1,+infty)$. Set:
$$Q(x)=(x^2+1)P(x)P'(x)+x(P^2(x)+P'^2(x))$$
How to prove $Q(x)=0$ has at least $2n-1$ distinct real roots?



I think the idea is finding closed intervals that the boundary points have different signs. I think the only special points are the roots of $P(x)$ or $P'(x)$. But if $a$ is such a point, we have $Q(a)>0$. So i'm not sure this can work out... Can anyone show me some hints? Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    6












    $begingroup$


    If $P(x)$ is a real polynomial has $n$ distinct real roots in $(1,+infty)$. Set:
    $$Q(x)=(x^2+1)P(x)P'(x)+x(P^2(x)+P'^2(x))$$
    How to prove $Q(x)=0$ has at least $2n-1$ distinct real roots?



    I think the idea is finding closed intervals that the boundary points have different signs. I think the only special points are the roots of $P(x)$ or $P'(x)$. But if $a$ is such a point, we have $Q(a)>0$. So i'm not sure this can work out... Can anyone show me some hints? Thanks!










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      6












      6








      6


      2



      $begingroup$


      If $P(x)$ is a real polynomial has $n$ distinct real roots in $(1,+infty)$. Set:
      $$Q(x)=(x^2+1)P(x)P'(x)+x(P^2(x)+P'^2(x))$$
      How to prove $Q(x)=0$ has at least $2n-1$ distinct real roots?



      I think the idea is finding closed intervals that the boundary points have different signs. I think the only special points are the roots of $P(x)$ or $P'(x)$. But if $a$ is such a point, we have $Q(a)>0$. So i'm not sure this can work out... Can anyone show me some hints? Thanks!










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      If $P(x)$ is a real polynomial has $n$ distinct real roots in $(1,+infty)$. Set:
      $$Q(x)=(x^2+1)P(x)P'(x)+x(P^2(x)+P'^2(x))$$
      How to prove $Q(x)=0$ has at least $2n-1$ distinct real roots?



      I think the idea is finding closed intervals that the boundary points have different signs. I think the only special points are the roots of $P(x)$ or $P'(x)$. But if $a$ is such a point, we have $Q(a)>0$. So i'm not sure this can work out... Can anyone show me some hints? Thanks!







      linear-algebra polynomials






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 13 '18 at 16:08









      IdeleIdele

      1,020410




      1,020410






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Dividing by $P(x)^2$, we get that assuming $P(x)neq 0$, $Q(x)=0$ is equivalent to $$xR^2+(x^2+1)R+x=0$$ where $R=P'(x)/P(x)$. Considering this as a quadratic in $R$, the roots are $R=-x$ and $R=-1/x$. So, $Q(x)=0$ iff $$P'(x)=-xP(x)text{ or }P(x)=-xP'(x)$$ (note that these conditions also include the possibility that $P(x)=0$, in which case we easily see that $Q(x)=0$ is equivalent to $P'(x)=0$ or $x=0$). Note that it is impossible for both $P'(x)=-xP(x)$ and $P(x)=-xP'(x)$ to hold at once for $x>1$ if $P(x)neq 0$, since together they imply $x=1/x$ (this is where the assumption that the roots of $P$ are greater than $1$ will come in).



          Now you can try and use this characterization to find roots of $Q$ between the roots of $P$, by considering how the signs of $P'(x)+xP(x)$ and $P(x)+xP'(x)$ change. The details are hidden below.




          Consider a pair of consecutive roots $a<b$ of $P$ in $(1,infty)$. Let me first assume that $a$ and $b$ are both simple roots. Then $P(a)=P(b)=0$ but $P'(a)$ and $P'(b)$ are nonzero with opposite sign. It follows that there must be some $cin(a,b)$ such that $P'(c)=-cP(c)$. Note that $P(c)neq 0$ since $a$ and $b$ are consecutive roots. Similarly, there must exist $din (a,b)$ such that $P(d)=-dP'(d)$ and $P(d)neq 0$.


          If $a$ or $b$ is a multiple root of $P$, the story is more complicated but the conclusion is the same. Let us assume without loss of generality that $P$ is positive on $(a,b)$. If $k$ is the multiplicity of the zero of $P$ at $b$, this means $P^{(j)}(b)=0$ for $j<k$ and $P^{(k)}(b)$ has the same sign as $(-1)^k$. Now observe that the first nonzero derivative of $P(x)+xP'(x)$ at $b$ is the $(k-1)$st derivative which is $bP^{(k)}(b)$ (all the other terms involve lower derivatives of $P$ at $b$ which all vanish). Thus for $x$ slightly less than $b$, $P(x)+xP'(x)$ has the same sign as $(-1)^{k-1}bP^{(k)}(b)$ which is negative. But we can do a similar analysis at $a$ to conclude that $P(x)+xP'(x)$ is positive for $x$ slightly greater than $a$. Thus $P(x)+xP'(x)$ must have a root in $(a,b)$. We can again do a similar analysis for $P'(x)+xP(x)$ to show that it also has a root in $(a,b)$.


          So, the upshot is that $Q$ must have at least two distinct roots between each pair of roots of $P$ in $(1,infty)$. This gives $2n-2$ distinct roots of $Q$. To find one more, let $a$ be the least root of $P$ in $(1,infty)$ (if $n=0$ there is nothing to prove). Note that $Q(a)geq 0$. Note also that if the leading term of $P$ is $bx^k$, then the leading term of $Q$ is $$x^2cdot bx^kcdot kbx^{k-1}+xcdot b^2x^{2k}=(k+1)b^2x^{2k+1}.$$ In particular, $Q$ has odd degree and positive leading coefficient. Thus $Q(x)to-infty$ as $xto-infty$. It follows that $Q$ must have a root which is less than or equal to $a$. Thus in total we find that $Q$ has at least $2n-1$ real roots, as desired.







          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038211%2fprove-a-polynomial-has-at-least-2n-1-distinct-real-roots%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            Dividing by $P(x)^2$, we get that assuming $P(x)neq 0$, $Q(x)=0$ is equivalent to $$xR^2+(x^2+1)R+x=0$$ where $R=P'(x)/P(x)$. Considering this as a quadratic in $R$, the roots are $R=-x$ and $R=-1/x$. So, $Q(x)=0$ iff $$P'(x)=-xP(x)text{ or }P(x)=-xP'(x)$$ (note that these conditions also include the possibility that $P(x)=0$, in which case we easily see that $Q(x)=0$ is equivalent to $P'(x)=0$ or $x=0$). Note that it is impossible for both $P'(x)=-xP(x)$ and $P(x)=-xP'(x)$ to hold at once for $x>1$ if $P(x)neq 0$, since together they imply $x=1/x$ (this is where the assumption that the roots of $P$ are greater than $1$ will come in).



            Now you can try and use this characterization to find roots of $Q$ between the roots of $P$, by considering how the signs of $P'(x)+xP(x)$ and $P(x)+xP'(x)$ change. The details are hidden below.




            Consider a pair of consecutive roots $a<b$ of $P$ in $(1,infty)$. Let me first assume that $a$ and $b$ are both simple roots. Then $P(a)=P(b)=0$ but $P'(a)$ and $P'(b)$ are nonzero with opposite sign. It follows that there must be some $cin(a,b)$ such that $P'(c)=-cP(c)$. Note that $P(c)neq 0$ since $a$ and $b$ are consecutive roots. Similarly, there must exist $din (a,b)$ such that $P(d)=-dP'(d)$ and $P(d)neq 0$.


            If $a$ or $b$ is a multiple root of $P$, the story is more complicated but the conclusion is the same. Let us assume without loss of generality that $P$ is positive on $(a,b)$. If $k$ is the multiplicity of the zero of $P$ at $b$, this means $P^{(j)}(b)=0$ for $j<k$ and $P^{(k)}(b)$ has the same sign as $(-1)^k$. Now observe that the first nonzero derivative of $P(x)+xP'(x)$ at $b$ is the $(k-1)$st derivative which is $bP^{(k)}(b)$ (all the other terms involve lower derivatives of $P$ at $b$ which all vanish). Thus for $x$ slightly less than $b$, $P(x)+xP'(x)$ has the same sign as $(-1)^{k-1}bP^{(k)}(b)$ which is negative. But we can do a similar analysis at $a$ to conclude that $P(x)+xP'(x)$ is positive for $x$ slightly greater than $a$. Thus $P(x)+xP'(x)$ must have a root in $(a,b)$. We can again do a similar analysis for $P'(x)+xP(x)$ to show that it also has a root in $(a,b)$.


            So, the upshot is that $Q$ must have at least two distinct roots between each pair of roots of $P$ in $(1,infty)$. This gives $2n-2$ distinct roots of $Q$. To find one more, let $a$ be the least root of $P$ in $(1,infty)$ (if $n=0$ there is nothing to prove). Note that $Q(a)geq 0$. Note also that if the leading term of $P$ is $bx^k$, then the leading term of $Q$ is $$x^2cdot bx^kcdot kbx^{k-1}+xcdot b^2x^{2k}=(k+1)b^2x^{2k+1}.$$ In particular, $Q$ has odd degree and positive leading coefficient. Thus $Q(x)to-infty$ as $xto-infty$. It follows that $Q$ must have a root which is less than or equal to $a$. Thus in total we find that $Q$ has at least $2n-1$ real roots, as desired.







            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              4












              $begingroup$

              Dividing by $P(x)^2$, we get that assuming $P(x)neq 0$, $Q(x)=0$ is equivalent to $$xR^2+(x^2+1)R+x=0$$ where $R=P'(x)/P(x)$. Considering this as a quadratic in $R$, the roots are $R=-x$ and $R=-1/x$. So, $Q(x)=0$ iff $$P'(x)=-xP(x)text{ or }P(x)=-xP'(x)$$ (note that these conditions also include the possibility that $P(x)=0$, in which case we easily see that $Q(x)=0$ is equivalent to $P'(x)=0$ or $x=0$). Note that it is impossible for both $P'(x)=-xP(x)$ and $P(x)=-xP'(x)$ to hold at once for $x>1$ if $P(x)neq 0$, since together they imply $x=1/x$ (this is where the assumption that the roots of $P$ are greater than $1$ will come in).



              Now you can try and use this characterization to find roots of $Q$ between the roots of $P$, by considering how the signs of $P'(x)+xP(x)$ and $P(x)+xP'(x)$ change. The details are hidden below.




              Consider a pair of consecutive roots $a<b$ of $P$ in $(1,infty)$. Let me first assume that $a$ and $b$ are both simple roots. Then $P(a)=P(b)=0$ but $P'(a)$ and $P'(b)$ are nonzero with opposite sign. It follows that there must be some $cin(a,b)$ such that $P'(c)=-cP(c)$. Note that $P(c)neq 0$ since $a$ and $b$ are consecutive roots. Similarly, there must exist $din (a,b)$ such that $P(d)=-dP'(d)$ and $P(d)neq 0$.


              If $a$ or $b$ is a multiple root of $P$, the story is more complicated but the conclusion is the same. Let us assume without loss of generality that $P$ is positive on $(a,b)$. If $k$ is the multiplicity of the zero of $P$ at $b$, this means $P^{(j)}(b)=0$ for $j<k$ and $P^{(k)}(b)$ has the same sign as $(-1)^k$. Now observe that the first nonzero derivative of $P(x)+xP'(x)$ at $b$ is the $(k-1)$st derivative which is $bP^{(k)}(b)$ (all the other terms involve lower derivatives of $P$ at $b$ which all vanish). Thus for $x$ slightly less than $b$, $P(x)+xP'(x)$ has the same sign as $(-1)^{k-1}bP^{(k)}(b)$ which is negative. But we can do a similar analysis at $a$ to conclude that $P(x)+xP'(x)$ is positive for $x$ slightly greater than $a$. Thus $P(x)+xP'(x)$ must have a root in $(a,b)$. We can again do a similar analysis for $P'(x)+xP(x)$ to show that it also has a root in $(a,b)$.


              So, the upshot is that $Q$ must have at least two distinct roots between each pair of roots of $P$ in $(1,infty)$. This gives $2n-2$ distinct roots of $Q$. To find one more, let $a$ be the least root of $P$ in $(1,infty)$ (if $n=0$ there is nothing to prove). Note that $Q(a)geq 0$. Note also that if the leading term of $P$ is $bx^k$, then the leading term of $Q$ is $$x^2cdot bx^kcdot kbx^{k-1}+xcdot b^2x^{2k}=(k+1)b^2x^{2k+1}.$$ In particular, $Q$ has odd degree and positive leading coefficient. Thus $Q(x)to-infty$ as $xto-infty$. It follows that $Q$ must have a root which is less than or equal to $a$. Thus in total we find that $Q$ has at least $2n-1$ real roots, as desired.







              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                4












                4








                4





                $begingroup$

                Dividing by $P(x)^2$, we get that assuming $P(x)neq 0$, $Q(x)=0$ is equivalent to $$xR^2+(x^2+1)R+x=0$$ where $R=P'(x)/P(x)$. Considering this as a quadratic in $R$, the roots are $R=-x$ and $R=-1/x$. So, $Q(x)=0$ iff $$P'(x)=-xP(x)text{ or }P(x)=-xP'(x)$$ (note that these conditions also include the possibility that $P(x)=0$, in which case we easily see that $Q(x)=0$ is equivalent to $P'(x)=0$ or $x=0$). Note that it is impossible for both $P'(x)=-xP(x)$ and $P(x)=-xP'(x)$ to hold at once for $x>1$ if $P(x)neq 0$, since together they imply $x=1/x$ (this is where the assumption that the roots of $P$ are greater than $1$ will come in).



                Now you can try and use this characterization to find roots of $Q$ between the roots of $P$, by considering how the signs of $P'(x)+xP(x)$ and $P(x)+xP'(x)$ change. The details are hidden below.




                Consider a pair of consecutive roots $a<b$ of $P$ in $(1,infty)$. Let me first assume that $a$ and $b$ are both simple roots. Then $P(a)=P(b)=0$ but $P'(a)$ and $P'(b)$ are nonzero with opposite sign. It follows that there must be some $cin(a,b)$ such that $P'(c)=-cP(c)$. Note that $P(c)neq 0$ since $a$ and $b$ are consecutive roots. Similarly, there must exist $din (a,b)$ such that $P(d)=-dP'(d)$ and $P(d)neq 0$.


                If $a$ or $b$ is a multiple root of $P$, the story is more complicated but the conclusion is the same. Let us assume without loss of generality that $P$ is positive on $(a,b)$. If $k$ is the multiplicity of the zero of $P$ at $b$, this means $P^{(j)}(b)=0$ for $j<k$ and $P^{(k)}(b)$ has the same sign as $(-1)^k$. Now observe that the first nonzero derivative of $P(x)+xP'(x)$ at $b$ is the $(k-1)$st derivative which is $bP^{(k)}(b)$ (all the other terms involve lower derivatives of $P$ at $b$ which all vanish). Thus for $x$ slightly less than $b$, $P(x)+xP'(x)$ has the same sign as $(-1)^{k-1}bP^{(k)}(b)$ which is negative. But we can do a similar analysis at $a$ to conclude that $P(x)+xP'(x)$ is positive for $x$ slightly greater than $a$. Thus $P(x)+xP'(x)$ must have a root in $(a,b)$. We can again do a similar analysis for $P'(x)+xP(x)$ to show that it also has a root in $(a,b)$.


                So, the upshot is that $Q$ must have at least two distinct roots between each pair of roots of $P$ in $(1,infty)$. This gives $2n-2$ distinct roots of $Q$. To find one more, let $a$ be the least root of $P$ in $(1,infty)$ (if $n=0$ there is nothing to prove). Note that $Q(a)geq 0$. Note also that if the leading term of $P$ is $bx^k$, then the leading term of $Q$ is $$x^2cdot bx^kcdot kbx^{k-1}+xcdot b^2x^{2k}=(k+1)b^2x^{2k+1}.$$ In particular, $Q$ has odd degree and positive leading coefficient. Thus $Q(x)to-infty$ as $xto-infty$. It follows that $Q$ must have a root which is less than or equal to $a$. Thus in total we find that $Q$ has at least $2n-1$ real roots, as desired.







                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Dividing by $P(x)^2$, we get that assuming $P(x)neq 0$, $Q(x)=0$ is equivalent to $$xR^2+(x^2+1)R+x=0$$ where $R=P'(x)/P(x)$. Considering this as a quadratic in $R$, the roots are $R=-x$ and $R=-1/x$. So, $Q(x)=0$ iff $$P'(x)=-xP(x)text{ or }P(x)=-xP'(x)$$ (note that these conditions also include the possibility that $P(x)=0$, in which case we easily see that $Q(x)=0$ is equivalent to $P'(x)=0$ or $x=0$). Note that it is impossible for both $P'(x)=-xP(x)$ and $P(x)=-xP'(x)$ to hold at once for $x>1$ if $P(x)neq 0$, since together they imply $x=1/x$ (this is where the assumption that the roots of $P$ are greater than $1$ will come in).



                Now you can try and use this characterization to find roots of $Q$ between the roots of $P$, by considering how the signs of $P'(x)+xP(x)$ and $P(x)+xP'(x)$ change. The details are hidden below.




                Consider a pair of consecutive roots $a<b$ of $P$ in $(1,infty)$. Let me first assume that $a$ and $b$ are both simple roots. Then $P(a)=P(b)=0$ but $P'(a)$ and $P'(b)$ are nonzero with opposite sign. It follows that there must be some $cin(a,b)$ such that $P'(c)=-cP(c)$. Note that $P(c)neq 0$ since $a$ and $b$ are consecutive roots. Similarly, there must exist $din (a,b)$ such that $P(d)=-dP'(d)$ and $P(d)neq 0$.


                If $a$ or $b$ is a multiple root of $P$, the story is more complicated but the conclusion is the same. Let us assume without loss of generality that $P$ is positive on $(a,b)$. If $k$ is the multiplicity of the zero of $P$ at $b$, this means $P^{(j)}(b)=0$ for $j<k$ and $P^{(k)}(b)$ has the same sign as $(-1)^k$. Now observe that the first nonzero derivative of $P(x)+xP'(x)$ at $b$ is the $(k-1)$st derivative which is $bP^{(k)}(b)$ (all the other terms involve lower derivatives of $P$ at $b$ which all vanish). Thus for $x$ slightly less than $b$, $P(x)+xP'(x)$ has the same sign as $(-1)^{k-1}bP^{(k)}(b)$ which is negative. But we can do a similar analysis at $a$ to conclude that $P(x)+xP'(x)$ is positive for $x$ slightly greater than $a$. Thus $P(x)+xP'(x)$ must have a root in $(a,b)$. We can again do a similar analysis for $P'(x)+xP(x)$ to show that it also has a root in $(a,b)$.


                So, the upshot is that $Q$ must have at least two distinct roots between each pair of roots of $P$ in $(1,infty)$. This gives $2n-2$ distinct roots of $Q$. To find one more, let $a$ be the least root of $P$ in $(1,infty)$ (if $n=0$ there is nothing to prove). Note that $Q(a)geq 0$. Note also that if the leading term of $P$ is $bx^k$, then the leading term of $Q$ is $$x^2cdot bx^kcdot kbx^{k-1}+xcdot b^2x^{2k}=(k+1)b^2x^{2k+1}.$$ In particular, $Q$ has odd degree and positive leading coefficient. Thus $Q(x)to-infty$ as $xto-infty$. It follows that $Q$ must have a root which is less than or equal to $a$. Thus in total we find that $Q$ has at least $2n-1$ real roots, as desired.








                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Dec 13 '18 at 20:58

























                answered Dec 13 '18 at 18:33









                Eric WofseyEric Wofsey

                192k14220352




                192k14220352






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038211%2fprove-a-polynomial-has-at-least-2n-1-distinct-real-roots%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                    ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                    Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?