How do you create a set in LateX?












20















I am very lost. I haven't been liking LaTeX as it's quite hard for me to get the hang of it, so I've decided to practice on my own during the summer, but I am already stuck on something that seems very basic.



I want to write sets. How do I create the brackets {}?
You know, say {2,4,6,8...} or {x|x is positive and even}. I tried ${2,4,6...}$ But this ignores the brackets.



I was searching if there is a specific command to create that say
Set{2,4,6...} or something similar. But no, it's an error and I cannot find such information.



I have given up, how do I create a set notation nicely??? Really simple things seem very... obscure to me with LaTeX and requires great hassle.
Is there any where good, a website, for me to learn this? Had a hard time in university last year, some people got easily okay with it but this is just not my cup of tea.... Seems to unnecessarily complicate something that could be done simpler.... Help is greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance.










share|improve this question




















  • 2





    Welcome! This has nothing to do with latex3 so I will edit the tags in a moment. However, please try ${thing 1, thing 2, thing 3}$.

    – cfr
    Jul 1 '15 at 3:26






  • 2





    I'd recommend Kopka and Daly's A Guide to LaTeX. I realise that recommending books is a bit old-fashioned but I think it makes this kind of thing a lot easier, to be honest. All the basics covered in an order which makes sense and ensures that you have a sense of both the big picture and the details. The other thing is to make sure you have a good editor. Most editors will help you out with this kind of thing - especially with the code for symbols.

    – cfr
    Jul 1 '15 at 3:31






  • 1





    Welcome from me as well! My friend, it's no wonder you're not getting on with LaTeX if you haven't - haven't been taken through the basics (whether by a person, or a book). Myself, I actually got started with the wikibooks LaTeX manual (en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LaTeX), which I think is a very good place to start, but there are quite possibly better resources out there - @cfr's seem good. But if you don't understand the principles of LaTeX, you're not going to have an easy time with it. Not that learning by doing isn't the way to go - it is, but you have to understand 1st principles.

    – Au101
    Jul 1 '15 at 3:41






  • 1





    Have you seen What are good learning resources for a LaTeX beginner?

    – clemens
    Jul 1 '15 at 7:49






  • 2





    The general answers that help you learn LaTeX are good ones. There's an answer to your particular question here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/209863/…

    – Ethan Bolker
    Jul 1 '15 at 16:09


















20















I am very lost. I haven't been liking LaTeX as it's quite hard for me to get the hang of it, so I've decided to practice on my own during the summer, but I am already stuck on something that seems very basic.



I want to write sets. How do I create the brackets {}?
You know, say {2,4,6,8...} or {x|x is positive and even}. I tried ${2,4,6...}$ But this ignores the brackets.



I was searching if there is a specific command to create that say
Set{2,4,6...} or something similar. But no, it's an error and I cannot find such information.



I have given up, how do I create a set notation nicely??? Really simple things seem very... obscure to me with LaTeX and requires great hassle.
Is there any where good, a website, for me to learn this? Had a hard time in university last year, some people got easily okay with it but this is just not my cup of tea.... Seems to unnecessarily complicate something that could be done simpler.... Help is greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance.










share|improve this question




















  • 2





    Welcome! This has nothing to do with latex3 so I will edit the tags in a moment. However, please try ${thing 1, thing 2, thing 3}$.

    – cfr
    Jul 1 '15 at 3:26






  • 2





    I'd recommend Kopka and Daly's A Guide to LaTeX. I realise that recommending books is a bit old-fashioned but I think it makes this kind of thing a lot easier, to be honest. All the basics covered in an order which makes sense and ensures that you have a sense of both the big picture and the details. The other thing is to make sure you have a good editor. Most editors will help you out with this kind of thing - especially with the code for symbols.

    – cfr
    Jul 1 '15 at 3:31






  • 1





    Welcome from me as well! My friend, it's no wonder you're not getting on with LaTeX if you haven't - haven't been taken through the basics (whether by a person, or a book). Myself, I actually got started with the wikibooks LaTeX manual (en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LaTeX), which I think is a very good place to start, but there are quite possibly better resources out there - @cfr's seem good. But if you don't understand the principles of LaTeX, you're not going to have an easy time with it. Not that learning by doing isn't the way to go - it is, but you have to understand 1st principles.

    – Au101
    Jul 1 '15 at 3:41






  • 1





    Have you seen What are good learning resources for a LaTeX beginner?

    – clemens
    Jul 1 '15 at 7:49






  • 2





    The general answers that help you learn LaTeX are good ones. There's an answer to your particular question here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/209863/…

    – Ethan Bolker
    Jul 1 '15 at 16:09
















20












20








20


5






I am very lost. I haven't been liking LaTeX as it's quite hard for me to get the hang of it, so I've decided to practice on my own during the summer, but I am already stuck on something that seems very basic.



I want to write sets. How do I create the brackets {}?
You know, say {2,4,6,8...} or {x|x is positive and even}. I tried ${2,4,6...}$ But this ignores the brackets.



I was searching if there is a specific command to create that say
Set{2,4,6...} or something similar. But no, it's an error and I cannot find such information.



I have given up, how do I create a set notation nicely??? Really simple things seem very... obscure to me with LaTeX and requires great hassle.
Is there any where good, a website, for me to learn this? Had a hard time in university last year, some people got easily okay with it but this is just not my cup of tea.... Seems to unnecessarily complicate something that could be done simpler.... Help is greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance.










share|improve this question
















I am very lost. I haven't been liking LaTeX as it's quite hard for me to get the hang of it, so I've decided to practice on my own during the summer, but I am already stuck on something that seems very basic.



I want to write sets. How do I create the brackets {}?
You know, say {2,4,6,8...} or {x|x is positive and even}. I tried ${2,4,6...}$ But this ignores the brackets.



I was searching if there is a specific command to create that say
Set{2,4,6...} or something similar. But no, it's an error and I cannot find such information.



I have given up, how do I create a set notation nicely??? Really simple things seem very... obscure to me with LaTeX and requires great hassle.
Is there any where good, a website, for me to learn this? Had a hard time in university last year, some people got easily okay with it but this is just not my cup of tea.... Seems to unnecessarily complicate something that could be done simpler.... Help is greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance.







math-operators






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 1 '15 at 3:29









cfr

157k8191390




157k8191390










asked Jul 1 '15 at 3:23









Melba1993Melba1993

221126




221126








  • 2





    Welcome! This has nothing to do with latex3 so I will edit the tags in a moment. However, please try ${thing 1, thing 2, thing 3}$.

    – cfr
    Jul 1 '15 at 3:26






  • 2





    I'd recommend Kopka and Daly's A Guide to LaTeX. I realise that recommending books is a bit old-fashioned but I think it makes this kind of thing a lot easier, to be honest. All the basics covered in an order which makes sense and ensures that you have a sense of both the big picture and the details. The other thing is to make sure you have a good editor. Most editors will help you out with this kind of thing - especially with the code for symbols.

    – cfr
    Jul 1 '15 at 3:31






  • 1





    Welcome from me as well! My friend, it's no wonder you're not getting on with LaTeX if you haven't - haven't been taken through the basics (whether by a person, or a book). Myself, I actually got started with the wikibooks LaTeX manual (en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LaTeX), which I think is a very good place to start, but there are quite possibly better resources out there - @cfr's seem good. But if you don't understand the principles of LaTeX, you're not going to have an easy time with it. Not that learning by doing isn't the way to go - it is, but you have to understand 1st principles.

    – Au101
    Jul 1 '15 at 3:41






  • 1





    Have you seen What are good learning resources for a LaTeX beginner?

    – clemens
    Jul 1 '15 at 7:49






  • 2





    The general answers that help you learn LaTeX are good ones. There's an answer to your particular question here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/209863/…

    – Ethan Bolker
    Jul 1 '15 at 16:09
















  • 2





    Welcome! This has nothing to do with latex3 so I will edit the tags in a moment. However, please try ${thing 1, thing 2, thing 3}$.

    – cfr
    Jul 1 '15 at 3:26






  • 2





    I'd recommend Kopka and Daly's A Guide to LaTeX. I realise that recommending books is a bit old-fashioned but I think it makes this kind of thing a lot easier, to be honest. All the basics covered in an order which makes sense and ensures that you have a sense of both the big picture and the details. The other thing is to make sure you have a good editor. Most editors will help you out with this kind of thing - especially with the code for symbols.

    – cfr
    Jul 1 '15 at 3:31






  • 1





    Welcome from me as well! My friend, it's no wonder you're not getting on with LaTeX if you haven't - haven't been taken through the basics (whether by a person, or a book). Myself, I actually got started with the wikibooks LaTeX manual (en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LaTeX), which I think is a very good place to start, but there are quite possibly better resources out there - @cfr's seem good. But if you don't understand the principles of LaTeX, you're not going to have an easy time with it. Not that learning by doing isn't the way to go - it is, but you have to understand 1st principles.

    – Au101
    Jul 1 '15 at 3:41






  • 1





    Have you seen What are good learning resources for a LaTeX beginner?

    – clemens
    Jul 1 '15 at 7:49






  • 2





    The general answers that help you learn LaTeX are good ones. There's an answer to your particular question here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/209863/…

    – Ethan Bolker
    Jul 1 '15 at 16:09










2




2





Welcome! This has nothing to do with latex3 so I will edit the tags in a moment. However, please try ${thing 1, thing 2, thing 3}$.

– cfr
Jul 1 '15 at 3:26





Welcome! This has nothing to do with latex3 so I will edit the tags in a moment. However, please try ${thing 1, thing 2, thing 3}$.

– cfr
Jul 1 '15 at 3:26




2




2





I'd recommend Kopka and Daly's A Guide to LaTeX. I realise that recommending books is a bit old-fashioned but I think it makes this kind of thing a lot easier, to be honest. All the basics covered in an order which makes sense and ensures that you have a sense of both the big picture and the details. The other thing is to make sure you have a good editor. Most editors will help you out with this kind of thing - especially with the code for symbols.

– cfr
Jul 1 '15 at 3:31





I'd recommend Kopka and Daly's A Guide to LaTeX. I realise that recommending books is a bit old-fashioned but I think it makes this kind of thing a lot easier, to be honest. All the basics covered in an order which makes sense and ensures that you have a sense of both the big picture and the details. The other thing is to make sure you have a good editor. Most editors will help you out with this kind of thing - especially with the code for symbols.

– cfr
Jul 1 '15 at 3:31




1




1





Welcome from me as well! My friend, it's no wonder you're not getting on with LaTeX if you haven't - haven't been taken through the basics (whether by a person, or a book). Myself, I actually got started with the wikibooks LaTeX manual (en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LaTeX), which I think is a very good place to start, but there are quite possibly better resources out there - @cfr's seem good. But if you don't understand the principles of LaTeX, you're not going to have an easy time with it. Not that learning by doing isn't the way to go - it is, but you have to understand 1st principles.

– Au101
Jul 1 '15 at 3:41





Welcome from me as well! My friend, it's no wonder you're not getting on with LaTeX if you haven't - haven't been taken through the basics (whether by a person, or a book). Myself, I actually got started with the wikibooks LaTeX manual (en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LaTeX), which I think is a very good place to start, but there are quite possibly better resources out there - @cfr's seem good. But if you don't understand the principles of LaTeX, you're not going to have an easy time with it. Not that learning by doing isn't the way to go - it is, but you have to understand 1st principles.

– Au101
Jul 1 '15 at 3:41




1




1





Have you seen What are good learning resources for a LaTeX beginner?

– clemens
Jul 1 '15 at 7:49





Have you seen What are good learning resources for a LaTeX beginner?

– clemens
Jul 1 '15 at 7:49




2




2





The general answers that help you learn LaTeX are good ones. There's an answer to your particular question here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/209863/…

– Ethan Bolker
Jul 1 '15 at 16:09







The general answers that help you learn LaTeX are good ones. There's an answer to your particular question here: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/209863/…

– Ethan Bolker
Jul 1 '15 at 16:09












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















38














To answer your specific question:



To quote from Leslie Lamport's "LaTeX: A Document Preparation System" (Leslie Lamport initially developed LaTeX):




The ten special characters



# $ % & ~ _ ^ { }



are used only in LaTeX commands.



...



Seven of those symbols can be produced by typing a in front of the corresponding character.



$ & % # _ { } are easy to produce.




In other words, to get { and } you must type { and }. This is because { and } mean something very special to LaTeX. They are used to delimit arguments. So with something like emph{Hi}, the emphasis starts at the { and finishes at the } (emph is a command which is used to emphasise text; the standard behaviour is for it to italicise it). In other words, everything enclosed within the braces is emphasised.



As such, if you want to print the symbols { and }, you can't just type the plain symbol. Instead you must "escape" it. The is the escape character and it basically tells LaTeX to pay attention. emph is just a word like any other to LaTeX. But emph is a command to LaTeX. What escaping a { does is cause LaTeX to print a { character.



So to get {2,4,6,8...}, all you need to do is type:



${2, 4, 6, 8dots}$



enter image description here



To get {x|x is positive and even}, you can do:



${x mid x text{ is positive and even}}$



enter image description here



As raised in the comments - this relies on the amsmath package. Instead, you can do:



${x mid x mbox{ is positive and even}}$



For most purposes, this has the same effect, but there are minor differences:



Difference between various methods for producing text in math mode



For really nice spacing, follow Hagen von Eitzen's advice and use:



${,x mid x text{ is positive and even},}$



enter image description here



As you can see, , inserts a thin space. There are other commands for inserting space in LaTeX. However, , is one of only two that can be used outside of math-mode.





But, really, it's important that you gain an understanding of the basic operating principles of LaTeX before you go further and start worrying about how to do specific things; otherwise you're gonna be completely at sea and everything's gonna seem like black magic and nonsense. So I really recommend you have a little look through some basic introductions before diving right in there.



However I learned by doing - I learned by trying it out, I learned by using LaTeX and looking things up whenever I wanted to do something I didn't yet know how to do. That's a very fulfilling, very enjoyable and very practical way to learn - although there are massive holes in my knowledge and, because my approach was very light on theory, I'm only just starting to learn about bad habits I've developed and principles I may have overlooked.



But still, as good as it is to dive in there and get your hands dirty, you have to, have to get a basic idea of what LaTeX is and how it works or you'll probably continue to have a pretty miserable time. It's no wonder you don't like it and everything seems arcane and difficult and a complete pain in the posterior to you!






share|improve this answer


























  • Also, in setbuilder notations as this I'd add spacing as in ${,x mid x text{ is positive and even},}$

    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Jul 1 '15 at 9:46













  • Sorry @MarcvanDongen, didn't realise. If nothing else, it demonstrates quite nicely something I overlooked because I never read about it, because I just assumed I knew how to do it, because of the "dive right in" approach I took :P

    – Au101
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:02



















11














LaTeX puts at your disposal the package braket that helps you creating beautiful sets, kets and bras for the Dirac notation. In particular



set{x, mid x<2}

ket{psi}

bra{phi}


do the job as simple as that as shown below:



Let $A=set{xmid psi(x)>0}$; also, given
$ket{psi}inmathcal{H}$, then $psi(x)coloneqqbraket{x|psi}$.


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Well, the sets command from braket is definitely useful, but the question has nothing to do with bra and ket from Dirac notation in Hilbert space. I suggest to elaborate on your answer.

    – Christian Hupfer
    Jul 1 '15 at 21:58











  • To make your question useful and self contained, please make a MWE and also show the output itself.

    – Nasser
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:10











  • Is it not possible to display LaTeX outputs as per LaTeX tags in this section? I have tried (and failed) to display a working example.

    – gented
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:15











  • One saves a screen dump into a jpeg and crops it. Then, one can attach the image to their answer by clicking the icon that looks like a picture.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Jul 2 '15 at 1:46











  • Thank you, I have done so. However, is there no way to show LaTeX markup inside the text? Other sections of the site do.

    – gented
    Jul 2 '15 at 20:15



















7














Here's an option with mathtools package. I show here the different possible sizes and usage.



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{mathtools}

DeclarePairedDelimiterXset[1]lbracerbrace{defgiven{;delimsizevert;}#1}

begin{document}
$set{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[big]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[Big]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[bigg]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[Bigg]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set*{ x given x > 0 rule{0cm}{2cm} }$ % rule is just here so you can see that it autostretches
end{document}


enter image description here



If you prefer to use set{ x | x > 0 } rather than set{ x given x > 0 } you can do



 DeclarePairedDelimiterXset[1]lbracerbrace{setaux#1}
defsetaux#1|{#1;delimsizevert;}





share|improve this answer
























  • To the pro users: I would welcome some help with the checking for a | inside the argument in the second option. I believe it has something to do with som sort of defsetaux#1|#2|#3endsetaux{ifrelaxdetokenize{#2}relax #1 else #1 ;delimsizevert; #2 fi} and call it with setaux #1||endsetaux. But I'm not certain (it probably has an error).

    – Manuel
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:08













  • Manuel — looks about right to me :)

    – Will Robertson
    Jul 2 '15 at 1:19





















1














I defined a new command set based on xparse package. The result is nice-looking.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse}

NewDocumentCommand{set}{o m}{%
% <code>
IfNoValueTF{#1}
{{#2}}
{{#1 mid #2}}%
% <code>
}
begin{document}
$set{x_1, dots}$ or ${set[x in X]{phi(x)}}$
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    I edited your answer to make it more like an answer (with a complete and compilable code as well as an image of the result). If you don't like it, be free to roll back to the original version.

    – JouleV
    Feb 27 at 8:18











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f253077%2fhow-do-you-create-a-set-in-latex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









38














To answer your specific question:



To quote from Leslie Lamport's "LaTeX: A Document Preparation System" (Leslie Lamport initially developed LaTeX):




The ten special characters



# $ % & ~ _ ^ { }



are used only in LaTeX commands.



...



Seven of those symbols can be produced by typing a in front of the corresponding character.



$ & % # _ { } are easy to produce.




In other words, to get { and } you must type { and }. This is because { and } mean something very special to LaTeX. They are used to delimit arguments. So with something like emph{Hi}, the emphasis starts at the { and finishes at the } (emph is a command which is used to emphasise text; the standard behaviour is for it to italicise it). In other words, everything enclosed within the braces is emphasised.



As such, if you want to print the symbols { and }, you can't just type the plain symbol. Instead you must "escape" it. The is the escape character and it basically tells LaTeX to pay attention. emph is just a word like any other to LaTeX. But emph is a command to LaTeX. What escaping a { does is cause LaTeX to print a { character.



So to get {2,4,6,8...}, all you need to do is type:



${2, 4, 6, 8dots}$



enter image description here



To get {x|x is positive and even}, you can do:



${x mid x text{ is positive and even}}$



enter image description here



As raised in the comments - this relies on the amsmath package. Instead, you can do:



${x mid x mbox{ is positive and even}}$



For most purposes, this has the same effect, but there are minor differences:



Difference between various methods for producing text in math mode



For really nice spacing, follow Hagen von Eitzen's advice and use:



${,x mid x text{ is positive and even},}$



enter image description here



As you can see, , inserts a thin space. There are other commands for inserting space in LaTeX. However, , is one of only two that can be used outside of math-mode.





But, really, it's important that you gain an understanding of the basic operating principles of LaTeX before you go further and start worrying about how to do specific things; otherwise you're gonna be completely at sea and everything's gonna seem like black magic and nonsense. So I really recommend you have a little look through some basic introductions before diving right in there.



However I learned by doing - I learned by trying it out, I learned by using LaTeX and looking things up whenever I wanted to do something I didn't yet know how to do. That's a very fulfilling, very enjoyable and very practical way to learn - although there are massive holes in my knowledge and, because my approach was very light on theory, I'm only just starting to learn about bad habits I've developed and principles I may have overlooked.



But still, as good as it is to dive in there and get your hands dirty, you have to, have to get a basic idea of what LaTeX is and how it works or you'll probably continue to have a pretty miserable time. It's no wonder you don't like it and everything seems arcane and difficult and a complete pain in the posterior to you!






share|improve this answer


























  • Also, in setbuilder notations as this I'd add spacing as in ${,x mid x text{ is positive and even},}$

    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Jul 1 '15 at 9:46













  • Sorry @MarcvanDongen, didn't realise. If nothing else, it demonstrates quite nicely something I overlooked because I never read about it, because I just assumed I knew how to do it, because of the "dive right in" approach I took :P

    – Au101
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:02
















38














To answer your specific question:



To quote from Leslie Lamport's "LaTeX: A Document Preparation System" (Leslie Lamport initially developed LaTeX):




The ten special characters



# $ % & ~ _ ^ { }



are used only in LaTeX commands.



...



Seven of those symbols can be produced by typing a in front of the corresponding character.



$ & % # _ { } are easy to produce.




In other words, to get { and } you must type { and }. This is because { and } mean something very special to LaTeX. They are used to delimit arguments. So with something like emph{Hi}, the emphasis starts at the { and finishes at the } (emph is a command which is used to emphasise text; the standard behaviour is for it to italicise it). In other words, everything enclosed within the braces is emphasised.



As such, if you want to print the symbols { and }, you can't just type the plain symbol. Instead you must "escape" it. The is the escape character and it basically tells LaTeX to pay attention. emph is just a word like any other to LaTeX. But emph is a command to LaTeX. What escaping a { does is cause LaTeX to print a { character.



So to get {2,4,6,8...}, all you need to do is type:



${2, 4, 6, 8dots}$



enter image description here



To get {x|x is positive and even}, you can do:



${x mid x text{ is positive and even}}$



enter image description here



As raised in the comments - this relies on the amsmath package. Instead, you can do:



${x mid x mbox{ is positive and even}}$



For most purposes, this has the same effect, but there are minor differences:



Difference between various methods for producing text in math mode



For really nice spacing, follow Hagen von Eitzen's advice and use:



${,x mid x text{ is positive and even},}$



enter image description here



As you can see, , inserts a thin space. There are other commands for inserting space in LaTeX. However, , is one of only two that can be used outside of math-mode.





But, really, it's important that you gain an understanding of the basic operating principles of LaTeX before you go further and start worrying about how to do specific things; otherwise you're gonna be completely at sea and everything's gonna seem like black magic and nonsense. So I really recommend you have a little look through some basic introductions before diving right in there.



However I learned by doing - I learned by trying it out, I learned by using LaTeX and looking things up whenever I wanted to do something I didn't yet know how to do. That's a very fulfilling, very enjoyable and very practical way to learn - although there are massive holes in my knowledge and, because my approach was very light on theory, I'm only just starting to learn about bad habits I've developed and principles I may have overlooked.



But still, as good as it is to dive in there and get your hands dirty, you have to, have to get a basic idea of what LaTeX is and how it works or you'll probably continue to have a pretty miserable time. It's no wonder you don't like it and everything seems arcane and difficult and a complete pain in the posterior to you!






share|improve this answer


























  • Also, in setbuilder notations as this I'd add spacing as in ${,x mid x text{ is positive and even},}$

    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Jul 1 '15 at 9:46













  • Sorry @MarcvanDongen, didn't realise. If nothing else, it demonstrates quite nicely something I overlooked because I never read about it, because I just assumed I knew how to do it, because of the "dive right in" approach I took :P

    – Au101
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:02














38












38








38







To answer your specific question:



To quote from Leslie Lamport's "LaTeX: A Document Preparation System" (Leslie Lamport initially developed LaTeX):




The ten special characters



# $ % & ~ _ ^ { }



are used only in LaTeX commands.



...



Seven of those symbols can be produced by typing a in front of the corresponding character.



$ & % # _ { } are easy to produce.




In other words, to get { and } you must type { and }. This is because { and } mean something very special to LaTeX. They are used to delimit arguments. So with something like emph{Hi}, the emphasis starts at the { and finishes at the } (emph is a command which is used to emphasise text; the standard behaviour is for it to italicise it). In other words, everything enclosed within the braces is emphasised.



As such, if you want to print the symbols { and }, you can't just type the plain symbol. Instead you must "escape" it. The is the escape character and it basically tells LaTeX to pay attention. emph is just a word like any other to LaTeX. But emph is a command to LaTeX. What escaping a { does is cause LaTeX to print a { character.



So to get {2,4,6,8...}, all you need to do is type:



${2, 4, 6, 8dots}$



enter image description here



To get {x|x is positive and even}, you can do:



${x mid x text{ is positive and even}}$



enter image description here



As raised in the comments - this relies on the amsmath package. Instead, you can do:



${x mid x mbox{ is positive and even}}$



For most purposes, this has the same effect, but there are minor differences:



Difference between various methods for producing text in math mode



For really nice spacing, follow Hagen von Eitzen's advice and use:



${,x mid x text{ is positive and even},}$



enter image description here



As you can see, , inserts a thin space. There are other commands for inserting space in LaTeX. However, , is one of only two that can be used outside of math-mode.





But, really, it's important that you gain an understanding of the basic operating principles of LaTeX before you go further and start worrying about how to do specific things; otherwise you're gonna be completely at sea and everything's gonna seem like black magic and nonsense. So I really recommend you have a little look through some basic introductions before diving right in there.



However I learned by doing - I learned by trying it out, I learned by using LaTeX and looking things up whenever I wanted to do something I didn't yet know how to do. That's a very fulfilling, very enjoyable and very practical way to learn - although there are massive holes in my knowledge and, because my approach was very light on theory, I'm only just starting to learn about bad habits I've developed and principles I may have overlooked.



But still, as good as it is to dive in there and get your hands dirty, you have to, have to get a basic idea of what LaTeX is and how it works or you'll probably continue to have a pretty miserable time. It's no wonder you don't like it and everything seems arcane and difficult and a complete pain in the posterior to you!






share|improve this answer















To answer your specific question:



To quote from Leslie Lamport's "LaTeX: A Document Preparation System" (Leslie Lamport initially developed LaTeX):




The ten special characters



# $ % & ~ _ ^ { }



are used only in LaTeX commands.



...



Seven of those symbols can be produced by typing a in front of the corresponding character.



$ & % # _ { } are easy to produce.




In other words, to get { and } you must type { and }. This is because { and } mean something very special to LaTeX. They are used to delimit arguments. So with something like emph{Hi}, the emphasis starts at the { and finishes at the } (emph is a command which is used to emphasise text; the standard behaviour is for it to italicise it). In other words, everything enclosed within the braces is emphasised.



As such, if you want to print the symbols { and }, you can't just type the plain symbol. Instead you must "escape" it. The is the escape character and it basically tells LaTeX to pay attention. emph is just a word like any other to LaTeX. But emph is a command to LaTeX. What escaping a { does is cause LaTeX to print a { character.



So to get {2,4,6,8...}, all you need to do is type:



${2, 4, 6, 8dots}$



enter image description here



To get {x|x is positive and even}, you can do:



${x mid x text{ is positive and even}}$



enter image description here



As raised in the comments - this relies on the amsmath package. Instead, you can do:



${x mid x mbox{ is positive and even}}$



For most purposes, this has the same effect, but there are minor differences:



Difference between various methods for producing text in math mode



For really nice spacing, follow Hagen von Eitzen's advice and use:



${,x mid x text{ is positive and even},}$



enter image description here



As you can see, , inserts a thin space. There are other commands for inserting space in LaTeX. However, , is one of only two that can be used outside of math-mode.





But, really, it's important that you gain an understanding of the basic operating principles of LaTeX before you go further and start worrying about how to do specific things; otherwise you're gonna be completely at sea and everything's gonna seem like black magic and nonsense. So I really recommend you have a little look through some basic introductions before diving right in there.



However I learned by doing - I learned by trying it out, I learned by using LaTeX and looking things up whenever I wanted to do something I didn't yet know how to do. That's a very fulfilling, very enjoyable and very practical way to learn - although there are massive holes in my knowledge and, because my approach was very light on theory, I'm only just starting to learn about bad habits I've developed and principles I may have overlooked.



But still, as good as it is to dive in there and get your hands dirty, you have to, have to get a basic idea of what LaTeX is and how it works or you'll probably continue to have a pretty miserable time. It's no wonder you don't like it and everything seems arcane and difficult and a complete pain in the posterior to you!







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:34









Community

1




1










answered Jul 1 '15 at 4:14









Au101Au101

7,16832254




7,16832254













  • Also, in setbuilder notations as this I'd add spacing as in ${,x mid x text{ is positive and even},}$

    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Jul 1 '15 at 9:46













  • Sorry @MarcvanDongen, didn't realise. If nothing else, it demonstrates quite nicely something I overlooked because I never read about it, because I just assumed I knew how to do it, because of the "dive right in" approach I took :P

    – Au101
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:02



















  • Also, in setbuilder notations as this I'd add spacing as in ${,x mid x text{ is positive and even},}$

    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Jul 1 '15 at 9:46













  • Sorry @MarcvanDongen, didn't realise. If nothing else, it demonstrates quite nicely something I overlooked because I never read about it, because I just assumed I knew how to do it, because of the "dive right in" approach I took :P

    – Au101
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:02

















Also, in setbuilder notations as this I'd add spacing as in ${,x mid x text{ is positive and even},}$

– Hagen von Eitzen
Jul 1 '15 at 9:46







Also, in setbuilder notations as this I'd add spacing as in ${,x mid x text{ is positive and even},}$

– Hagen von Eitzen
Jul 1 '15 at 9:46















Sorry @MarcvanDongen, didn't realise. If nothing else, it demonstrates quite nicely something I overlooked because I never read about it, because I just assumed I knew how to do it, because of the "dive right in" approach I took :P

– Au101
Jul 1 '15 at 22:02





Sorry @MarcvanDongen, didn't realise. If nothing else, it demonstrates quite nicely something I overlooked because I never read about it, because I just assumed I knew how to do it, because of the "dive right in" approach I took :P

– Au101
Jul 1 '15 at 22:02











11














LaTeX puts at your disposal the package braket that helps you creating beautiful sets, kets and bras for the Dirac notation. In particular



set{x, mid x<2}

ket{psi}

bra{phi}


do the job as simple as that as shown below:



Let $A=set{xmid psi(x)>0}$; also, given
$ket{psi}inmathcal{H}$, then $psi(x)coloneqqbraket{x|psi}$.


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Well, the sets command from braket is definitely useful, but the question has nothing to do with bra and ket from Dirac notation in Hilbert space. I suggest to elaborate on your answer.

    – Christian Hupfer
    Jul 1 '15 at 21:58











  • To make your question useful and self contained, please make a MWE and also show the output itself.

    – Nasser
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:10











  • Is it not possible to display LaTeX outputs as per LaTeX tags in this section? I have tried (and failed) to display a working example.

    – gented
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:15











  • One saves a screen dump into a jpeg and crops it. Then, one can attach the image to their answer by clicking the icon that looks like a picture.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Jul 2 '15 at 1:46











  • Thank you, I have done so. However, is there no way to show LaTeX markup inside the text? Other sections of the site do.

    – gented
    Jul 2 '15 at 20:15
















11














LaTeX puts at your disposal the package braket that helps you creating beautiful sets, kets and bras for the Dirac notation. In particular



set{x, mid x<2}

ket{psi}

bra{phi}


do the job as simple as that as shown below:



Let $A=set{xmid psi(x)>0}$; also, given
$ket{psi}inmathcal{H}$, then $psi(x)coloneqqbraket{x|psi}$.


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Well, the sets command from braket is definitely useful, but the question has nothing to do with bra and ket from Dirac notation in Hilbert space. I suggest to elaborate on your answer.

    – Christian Hupfer
    Jul 1 '15 at 21:58











  • To make your question useful and self contained, please make a MWE and also show the output itself.

    – Nasser
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:10











  • Is it not possible to display LaTeX outputs as per LaTeX tags in this section? I have tried (and failed) to display a working example.

    – gented
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:15











  • One saves a screen dump into a jpeg and crops it. Then, one can attach the image to their answer by clicking the icon that looks like a picture.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Jul 2 '15 at 1:46











  • Thank you, I have done so. However, is there no way to show LaTeX markup inside the text? Other sections of the site do.

    – gented
    Jul 2 '15 at 20:15














11












11








11







LaTeX puts at your disposal the package braket that helps you creating beautiful sets, kets and bras for the Dirac notation. In particular



set{x, mid x<2}

ket{psi}

bra{phi}


do the job as simple as that as shown below:



Let $A=set{xmid psi(x)>0}$; also, given
$ket{psi}inmathcal{H}$, then $psi(x)coloneqqbraket{x|psi}$.


enter image description here






share|improve this answer















LaTeX puts at your disposal the package braket that helps you creating beautiful sets, kets and bras for the Dirac notation. In particular



set{x, mid x<2}

ket{psi}

bra{phi}


do the job as simple as that as shown below:



Let $A=set{xmid psi(x)>0}$; also, given
$ket{psi}inmathcal{H}$, then $psi(x)coloneqqbraket{x|psi}$.


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jul 2 '15 at 20:14

























answered Jul 1 '15 at 21:49









gentedgented

22418




22418








  • 1





    Well, the sets command from braket is definitely useful, but the question has nothing to do with bra and ket from Dirac notation in Hilbert space. I suggest to elaborate on your answer.

    – Christian Hupfer
    Jul 1 '15 at 21:58











  • To make your question useful and self contained, please make a MWE and also show the output itself.

    – Nasser
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:10











  • Is it not possible to display LaTeX outputs as per LaTeX tags in this section? I have tried (and failed) to display a working example.

    – gented
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:15











  • One saves a screen dump into a jpeg and crops it. Then, one can attach the image to their answer by clicking the icon that looks like a picture.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Jul 2 '15 at 1:46











  • Thank you, I have done so. However, is there no way to show LaTeX markup inside the text? Other sections of the site do.

    – gented
    Jul 2 '15 at 20:15














  • 1





    Well, the sets command from braket is definitely useful, but the question has nothing to do with bra and ket from Dirac notation in Hilbert space. I suggest to elaborate on your answer.

    – Christian Hupfer
    Jul 1 '15 at 21:58











  • To make your question useful and self contained, please make a MWE and also show the output itself.

    – Nasser
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:10











  • Is it not possible to display LaTeX outputs as per LaTeX tags in this section? I have tried (and failed) to display a working example.

    – gented
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:15











  • One saves a screen dump into a jpeg and crops it. Then, one can attach the image to their answer by clicking the icon that looks like a picture.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Jul 2 '15 at 1:46











  • Thank you, I have done so. However, is there no way to show LaTeX markup inside the text? Other sections of the site do.

    – gented
    Jul 2 '15 at 20:15








1




1





Well, the sets command from braket is definitely useful, but the question has nothing to do with bra and ket from Dirac notation in Hilbert space. I suggest to elaborate on your answer.

– Christian Hupfer
Jul 1 '15 at 21:58





Well, the sets command from braket is definitely useful, but the question has nothing to do with bra and ket from Dirac notation in Hilbert space. I suggest to elaborate on your answer.

– Christian Hupfer
Jul 1 '15 at 21:58













To make your question useful and self contained, please make a MWE and also show the output itself.

– Nasser
Jul 1 '15 at 22:10





To make your question useful and self contained, please make a MWE and also show the output itself.

– Nasser
Jul 1 '15 at 22:10













Is it not possible to display LaTeX outputs as per LaTeX tags in this section? I have tried (and failed) to display a working example.

– gented
Jul 1 '15 at 22:15





Is it not possible to display LaTeX outputs as per LaTeX tags in this section? I have tried (and failed) to display a working example.

– gented
Jul 1 '15 at 22:15













One saves a screen dump into a jpeg and crops it. Then, one can attach the image to their answer by clicking the icon that looks like a picture.

– Steven B. Segletes
Jul 2 '15 at 1:46





One saves a screen dump into a jpeg and crops it. Then, one can attach the image to their answer by clicking the icon that looks like a picture.

– Steven B. Segletes
Jul 2 '15 at 1:46













Thank you, I have done so. However, is there no way to show LaTeX markup inside the text? Other sections of the site do.

– gented
Jul 2 '15 at 20:15





Thank you, I have done so. However, is there no way to show LaTeX markup inside the text? Other sections of the site do.

– gented
Jul 2 '15 at 20:15











7














Here's an option with mathtools package. I show here the different possible sizes and usage.



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{mathtools}

DeclarePairedDelimiterXset[1]lbracerbrace{defgiven{;delimsizevert;}#1}

begin{document}
$set{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[big]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[Big]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[bigg]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[Bigg]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set*{ x given x > 0 rule{0cm}{2cm} }$ % rule is just here so you can see that it autostretches
end{document}


enter image description here



If you prefer to use set{ x | x > 0 } rather than set{ x given x > 0 } you can do



 DeclarePairedDelimiterXset[1]lbracerbrace{setaux#1}
defsetaux#1|{#1;delimsizevert;}





share|improve this answer
























  • To the pro users: I would welcome some help with the checking for a | inside the argument in the second option. I believe it has something to do with som sort of defsetaux#1|#2|#3endsetaux{ifrelaxdetokenize{#2}relax #1 else #1 ;delimsizevert; #2 fi} and call it with setaux #1||endsetaux. But I'm not certain (it probably has an error).

    – Manuel
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:08













  • Manuel — looks about right to me :)

    – Will Robertson
    Jul 2 '15 at 1:19


















7














Here's an option with mathtools package. I show here the different possible sizes and usage.



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{mathtools}

DeclarePairedDelimiterXset[1]lbracerbrace{defgiven{;delimsizevert;}#1}

begin{document}
$set{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[big]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[Big]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[bigg]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[Bigg]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set*{ x given x > 0 rule{0cm}{2cm} }$ % rule is just here so you can see that it autostretches
end{document}


enter image description here



If you prefer to use set{ x | x > 0 } rather than set{ x given x > 0 } you can do



 DeclarePairedDelimiterXset[1]lbracerbrace{setaux#1}
defsetaux#1|{#1;delimsizevert;}





share|improve this answer
























  • To the pro users: I would welcome some help with the checking for a | inside the argument in the second option. I believe it has something to do with som sort of defsetaux#1|#2|#3endsetaux{ifrelaxdetokenize{#2}relax #1 else #1 ;delimsizevert; #2 fi} and call it with setaux #1||endsetaux. But I'm not certain (it probably has an error).

    – Manuel
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:08













  • Manuel — looks about right to me :)

    – Will Robertson
    Jul 2 '15 at 1:19
















7












7








7







Here's an option with mathtools package. I show here the different possible sizes and usage.



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{mathtools}

DeclarePairedDelimiterXset[1]lbracerbrace{defgiven{;delimsizevert;}#1}

begin{document}
$set{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[big]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[Big]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[bigg]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[Bigg]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set*{ x given x > 0 rule{0cm}{2cm} }$ % rule is just here so you can see that it autostretches
end{document}


enter image description here



If you prefer to use set{ x | x > 0 } rather than set{ x given x > 0 } you can do



 DeclarePairedDelimiterXset[1]lbracerbrace{setaux#1}
defsetaux#1|{#1;delimsizevert;}





share|improve this answer













Here's an option with mathtools package. I show here the different possible sizes and usage.



documentclass{scrartcl}
usepackage{mathtools}

DeclarePairedDelimiterXset[1]lbracerbrace{defgiven{;delimsizevert;}#1}

begin{document}
$set{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[big]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[Big]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[bigg]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set[Bigg]{ x given x > 0 }$
$set*{ x given x > 0 rule{0cm}{2cm} }$ % rule is just here so you can see that it autostretches
end{document}


enter image description here



If you prefer to use set{ x | x > 0 } rather than set{ x given x > 0 } you can do



 DeclarePairedDelimiterXset[1]lbracerbrace{setaux#1}
defsetaux#1|{#1;delimsizevert;}






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jul 1 '15 at 21:59









ManuelManuel

21.5k846108




21.5k846108













  • To the pro users: I would welcome some help with the checking for a | inside the argument in the second option. I believe it has something to do with som sort of defsetaux#1|#2|#3endsetaux{ifrelaxdetokenize{#2}relax #1 else #1 ;delimsizevert; #2 fi} and call it with setaux #1||endsetaux. But I'm not certain (it probably has an error).

    – Manuel
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:08













  • Manuel — looks about right to me :)

    – Will Robertson
    Jul 2 '15 at 1:19





















  • To the pro users: I would welcome some help with the checking for a | inside the argument in the second option. I believe it has something to do with som sort of defsetaux#1|#2|#3endsetaux{ifrelaxdetokenize{#2}relax #1 else #1 ;delimsizevert; #2 fi} and call it with setaux #1||endsetaux. But I'm not certain (it probably has an error).

    – Manuel
    Jul 1 '15 at 22:08













  • Manuel — looks about right to me :)

    – Will Robertson
    Jul 2 '15 at 1:19



















To the pro users: I would welcome some help with the checking for a | inside the argument in the second option. I believe it has something to do with som sort of defsetaux#1|#2|#3endsetaux{ifrelaxdetokenize{#2}relax #1 else #1 ;delimsizevert; #2 fi} and call it with setaux #1||endsetaux. But I'm not certain (it probably has an error).

– Manuel
Jul 1 '15 at 22:08







To the pro users: I would welcome some help with the checking for a | inside the argument in the second option. I believe it has something to do with som sort of defsetaux#1|#2|#3endsetaux{ifrelaxdetokenize{#2}relax #1 else #1 ;delimsizevert; #2 fi} and call it with setaux #1||endsetaux. But I'm not certain (it probably has an error).

– Manuel
Jul 1 '15 at 22:08















Manuel — looks about right to me :)

– Will Robertson
Jul 2 '15 at 1:19







Manuel — looks about right to me :)

– Will Robertson
Jul 2 '15 at 1:19













1














I defined a new command set based on xparse package. The result is nice-looking.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse}

NewDocumentCommand{set}{o m}{%
% <code>
IfNoValueTF{#1}
{{#2}}
{{#1 mid #2}}%
% <code>
}
begin{document}
$set{x_1, dots}$ or ${set[x in X]{phi(x)}}$
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    I edited your answer to make it more like an answer (with a complete and compilable code as well as an image of the result). If you don't like it, be free to roll back to the original version.

    – JouleV
    Feb 27 at 8:18
















1














I defined a new command set based on xparse package. The result is nice-looking.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse}

NewDocumentCommand{set}{o m}{%
% <code>
IfNoValueTF{#1}
{{#2}}
{{#1 mid #2}}%
% <code>
}
begin{document}
$set{x_1, dots}$ or ${set[x in X]{phi(x)}}$
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    I edited your answer to make it more like an answer (with a complete and compilable code as well as an image of the result). If you don't like it, be free to roll back to the original version.

    – JouleV
    Feb 27 at 8:18














1












1








1







I defined a new command set based on xparse package. The result is nice-looking.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse}

NewDocumentCommand{set}{o m}{%
% <code>
IfNoValueTF{#1}
{{#2}}
{{#1 mid #2}}%
% <code>
}
begin{document}
$set{x_1, dots}$ or ${set[x in X]{phi(x)}}$
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer















I defined a new command set based on xparse package. The result is nice-looking.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse}

NewDocumentCommand{set}{o m}{%
% <code>
IfNoValueTF{#1}
{{#2}}
{{#1 mid #2}}%
% <code>
}
begin{document}
$set{x_1, dots}$ or ${set[x in X]{phi(x)}}$
end{document}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Feb 27 at 8:17









JouleV

4,91111139




4,91111139










answered Feb 27 at 8:10









Jens WagemakerJens Wagemaker

1206




1206








  • 1





    I edited your answer to make it more like an answer (with a complete and compilable code as well as an image of the result). If you don't like it, be free to roll back to the original version.

    – JouleV
    Feb 27 at 8:18














  • 1





    I edited your answer to make it more like an answer (with a complete and compilable code as well as an image of the result). If you don't like it, be free to roll back to the original version.

    – JouleV
    Feb 27 at 8:18








1




1





I edited your answer to make it more like an answer (with a complete and compilable code as well as an image of the result). If you don't like it, be free to roll back to the original version.

– JouleV
Feb 27 at 8:18





I edited your answer to make it more like an answer (with a complete and compilable code as well as an image of the result). If you don't like it, be free to roll back to the original version.

– JouleV
Feb 27 at 8:18


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f253077%2fhow-do-you-create-a-set-in-latex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?