Gmail built in pdf viewer omits last symbol in an url, any idea why? [closed]












1















Using amsrefs, I want to refer to an answer on mathoverflow. That site has automated amsrefs entry creation option. When I use it, everything goes fine, and the pdf file contains correct link. However when I send the file by gmail and open it in gmail with either Chrome or Firefox (latest build, on Windows 10), there is a problem with that link. If I copy it and paste elsewhere it is correct, but if I click on it, I am taken to a wrong address: instead of https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198 I get https://mathoverflow.net/q/31319 which is an entirely different page.



MWE: produce a pdf from



documentclass{amsart}

usepackage{amsrefs}

begin{document}

$binom nk$

begin{biblist}
bib{E}{misc}{
author={Noam D. Elkies (https://mathoverflow.net/users/14830/noam-d-elkies)},
note={URL: https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198 (version: 2018-10-19)}
}
end{biblist}
end{document}


send it to, say, yourself via gmail and open it from within the gmail pdf viewer.



Let me add that with any other math command that I tried in place of that $binom nk$ the error disappears.



What can I do?










share|improve this question













closed as off-topic by Werner, Phelype Oleinik, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Kurt Mar 1 at 23:55


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question does not fall within the scope of TeX, LaTeX or related typesetting systems as defined in the help center." – Werner, Phelype Oleinik, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Kurt

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 1





    If you want a link in the PDF you should mark it with url{....} and use hyperref your PDF has no link just some text so you are relying on the pdf reader to make a non-standard guess that something that looks like a link is a link.

    – David Carlisle
    Mar 1 at 20:36











  • I'm able to verify this. However, if you download the file and use a dedicated PDF viewer, the links work as expected. This is therefore dependent on the Gmail PDF viewer and not something to do with (La)TeX. Weird though...

    – Werner
    Mar 1 at 20:47











  • @DavidCarlisle I see, thanks. But is not it strange that this guess is influenced by the presence of $binom nk$ nearby? Because other kinds of commands (like $frac nk$ for example) do not cause this error.

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 1 at 20:56











  • @Werner Yes, that's true. Still, with the tag viewer the question is relevant I believe. And, many thanks for the verification!

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 1 at 20:57








  • 1





    Even more odd is that is a redirected address since mathoverflow.net/q/313198 leads to mathoverflow.net/questions/313191/… HOWEVER back to your issue you could try adding an extra / so it starts https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198/ then if gmail trims it back like this comment box did (hence the quotes) it will still redirect like mathoverflow.net/q/313198 does !!

    – KJO
    Mar 1 at 22:19


















1















Using amsrefs, I want to refer to an answer on mathoverflow. That site has automated amsrefs entry creation option. When I use it, everything goes fine, and the pdf file contains correct link. However when I send the file by gmail and open it in gmail with either Chrome or Firefox (latest build, on Windows 10), there is a problem with that link. If I copy it and paste elsewhere it is correct, but if I click on it, I am taken to a wrong address: instead of https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198 I get https://mathoverflow.net/q/31319 which is an entirely different page.



MWE: produce a pdf from



documentclass{amsart}

usepackage{amsrefs}

begin{document}

$binom nk$

begin{biblist}
bib{E}{misc}{
author={Noam D. Elkies (https://mathoverflow.net/users/14830/noam-d-elkies)},
note={URL: https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198 (version: 2018-10-19)}
}
end{biblist}
end{document}


send it to, say, yourself via gmail and open it from within the gmail pdf viewer.



Let me add that with any other math command that I tried in place of that $binom nk$ the error disappears.



What can I do?










share|improve this question













closed as off-topic by Werner, Phelype Oleinik, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Kurt Mar 1 at 23:55


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question does not fall within the scope of TeX, LaTeX or related typesetting systems as defined in the help center." – Werner, Phelype Oleinik, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Kurt

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 1





    If you want a link in the PDF you should mark it with url{....} and use hyperref your PDF has no link just some text so you are relying on the pdf reader to make a non-standard guess that something that looks like a link is a link.

    – David Carlisle
    Mar 1 at 20:36











  • I'm able to verify this. However, if you download the file and use a dedicated PDF viewer, the links work as expected. This is therefore dependent on the Gmail PDF viewer and not something to do with (La)TeX. Weird though...

    – Werner
    Mar 1 at 20:47











  • @DavidCarlisle I see, thanks. But is not it strange that this guess is influenced by the presence of $binom nk$ nearby? Because other kinds of commands (like $frac nk$ for example) do not cause this error.

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 1 at 20:56











  • @Werner Yes, that's true. Still, with the tag viewer the question is relevant I believe. And, many thanks for the verification!

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 1 at 20:57








  • 1





    Even more odd is that is a redirected address since mathoverflow.net/q/313198 leads to mathoverflow.net/questions/313191/… HOWEVER back to your issue you could try adding an extra / so it starts https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198/ then if gmail trims it back like this comment box did (hence the quotes) it will still redirect like mathoverflow.net/q/313198 does !!

    – KJO
    Mar 1 at 22:19
















1












1








1








Using amsrefs, I want to refer to an answer on mathoverflow. That site has automated amsrefs entry creation option. When I use it, everything goes fine, and the pdf file contains correct link. However when I send the file by gmail and open it in gmail with either Chrome or Firefox (latest build, on Windows 10), there is a problem with that link. If I copy it and paste elsewhere it is correct, but if I click on it, I am taken to a wrong address: instead of https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198 I get https://mathoverflow.net/q/31319 which is an entirely different page.



MWE: produce a pdf from



documentclass{amsart}

usepackage{amsrefs}

begin{document}

$binom nk$

begin{biblist}
bib{E}{misc}{
author={Noam D. Elkies (https://mathoverflow.net/users/14830/noam-d-elkies)},
note={URL: https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198 (version: 2018-10-19)}
}
end{biblist}
end{document}


send it to, say, yourself via gmail and open it from within the gmail pdf viewer.



Let me add that with any other math command that I tried in place of that $binom nk$ the error disappears.



What can I do?










share|improve this question














Using amsrefs, I want to refer to an answer on mathoverflow. That site has automated amsrefs entry creation option. When I use it, everything goes fine, and the pdf file contains correct link. However when I send the file by gmail and open it in gmail with either Chrome or Firefox (latest build, on Windows 10), there is a problem with that link. If I copy it and paste elsewhere it is correct, but if I click on it, I am taken to a wrong address: instead of https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198 I get https://mathoverflow.net/q/31319 which is an entirely different page.



MWE: produce a pdf from



documentclass{amsart}

usepackage{amsrefs}

begin{document}

$binom nk$

begin{biblist}
bib{E}{misc}{
author={Noam D. Elkies (https://mathoverflow.net/users/14830/noam-d-elkies)},
note={URL: https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198 (version: 2018-10-19)}
}
end{biblist}
end{document}


send it to, say, yourself via gmail and open it from within the gmail pdf viewer.



Let me add that with any other math command that I tried in place of that $binom nk$ the error disappears.



What can I do?







pdf viewers bugs amsrefs email






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 1 at 20:30









მამუკა ჯიბლაძემამუკა ჯიბლაძე

386110




386110




closed as off-topic by Werner, Phelype Oleinik, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Kurt Mar 1 at 23:55


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question does not fall within the scope of TeX, LaTeX or related typesetting systems as defined in the help center." – Werner, Phelype Oleinik, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Kurt

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by Werner, Phelype Oleinik, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Kurt Mar 1 at 23:55


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question does not fall within the scope of TeX, LaTeX or related typesetting systems as defined in the help center." – Werner, Phelype Oleinik, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Kurt

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1





    If you want a link in the PDF you should mark it with url{....} and use hyperref your PDF has no link just some text so you are relying on the pdf reader to make a non-standard guess that something that looks like a link is a link.

    – David Carlisle
    Mar 1 at 20:36











  • I'm able to verify this. However, if you download the file and use a dedicated PDF viewer, the links work as expected. This is therefore dependent on the Gmail PDF viewer and not something to do with (La)TeX. Weird though...

    – Werner
    Mar 1 at 20:47











  • @DavidCarlisle I see, thanks. But is not it strange that this guess is influenced by the presence of $binom nk$ nearby? Because other kinds of commands (like $frac nk$ for example) do not cause this error.

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 1 at 20:56











  • @Werner Yes, that's true. Still, with the tag viewer the question is relevant I believe. And, many thanks for the verification!

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 1 at 20:57








  • 1





    Even more odd is that is a redirected address since mathoverflow.net/q/313198 leads to mathoverflow.net/questions/313191/… HOWEVER back to your issue you could try adding an extra / so it starts https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198/ then if gmail trims it back like this comment box did (hence the quotes) it will still redirect like mathoverflow.net/q/313198 does !!

    – KJO
    Mar 1 at 22:19
















  • 1





    If you want a link in the PDF you should mark it with url{....} and use hyperref your PDF has no link just some text so you are relying on the pdf reader to make a non-standard guess that something that looks like a link is a link.

    – David Carlisle
    Mar 1 at 20:36











  • I'm able to verify this. However, if you download the file and use a dedicated PDF viewer, the links work as expected. This is therefore dependent on the Gmail PDF viewer and not something to do with (La)TeX. Weird though...

    – Werner
    Mar 1 at 20:47











  • @DavidCarlisle I see, thanks. But is not it strange that this guess is influenced by the presence of $binom nk$ nearby? Because other kinds of commands (like $frac nk$ for example) do not cause this error.

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 1 at 20:56











  • @Werner Yes, that's true. Still, with the tag viewer the question is relevant I believe. And, many thanks for the verification!

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 1 at 20:57








  • 1





    Even more odd is that is a redirected address since mathoverflow.net/q/313198 leads to mathoverflow.net/questions/313191/… HOWEVER back to your issue you could try adding an extra / so it starts https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198/ then if gmail trims it back like this comment box did (hence the quotes) it will still redirect like mathoverflow.net/q/313198 does !!

    – KJO
    Mar 1 at 22:19










1




1





If you want a link in the PDF you should mark it with url{....} and use hyperref your PDF has no link just some text so you are relying on the pdf reader to make a non-standard guess that something that looks like a link is a link.

– David Carlisle
Mar 1 at 20:36





If you want a link in the PDF you should mark it with url{....} and use hyperref your PDF has no link just some text so you are relying on the pdf reader to make a non-standard guess that something that looks like a link is a link.

– David Carlisle
Mar 1 at 20:36













I'm able to verify this. However, if you download the file and use a dedicated PDF viewer, the links work as expected. This is therefore dependent on the Gmail PDF viewer and not something to do with (La)TeX. Weird though...

– Werner
Mar 1 at 20:47





I'm able to verify this. However, if you download the file and use a dedicated PDF viewer, the links work as expected. This is therefore dependent on the Gmail PDF viewer and not something to do with (La)TeX. Weird though...

– Werner
Mar 1 at 20:47













@DavidCarlisle I see, thanks. But is not it strange that this guess is influenced by the presence of $binom nk$ nearby? Because other kinds of commands (like $frac nk$ for example) do not cause this error.

– მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
Mar 1 at 20:56





@DavidCarlisle I see, thanks. But is not it strange that this guess is influenced by the presence of $binom nk$ nearby? Because other kinds of commands (like $frac nk$ for example) do not cause this error.

– მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
Mar 1 at 20:56













@Werner Yes, that's true. Still, with the tag viewer the question is relevant I believe. And, many thanks for the verification!

– მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
Mar 1 at 20:57







@Werner Yes, that's true. Still, with the tag viewer the question is relevant I believe. And, many thanks for the verification!

– მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
Mar 1 at 20:57






1




1





Even more odd is that is a redirected address since mathoverflow.net/q/313198 leads to mathoverflow.net/questions/313191/… HOWEVER back to your issue you could try adding an extra / so it starts https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198/ then if gmail trims it back like this comment box did (hence the quotes) it will still redirect like mathoverflow.net/q/313198 does !!

– KJO
Mar 1 at 22:19







Even more odd is that is a redirected address since mathoverflow.net/q/313198 leads to mathoverflow.net/questions/313191/… HOWEVER back to your issue you could try adding an extra / so it starts https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198/ then if gmail trims it back like this comment box did (hence the quotes) it will still redirect like mathoverflow.net/q/313198 does !!

– KJO
Mar 1 at 22:19












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














You should use hyperref and url if you want real links:



documentclass{amsart}

usepackage{amsrefs}
usepackage{hyperref}
begin{document}

$binom nk$

begin{biblist}
bib{E}{misc}{
author={Noam D. Elkies (https://mathoverflow.net/users/14830/noam-d-elkies)},
note={URL: url{https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198} (version: 2018-10-19)}
}
end{biblist}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer
























  • Yes it works that way, thank you. However let me point out that without that $binom nk$ it also worked without hyperref and without the url{...}

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 1 at 20:53






  • 1





    Without hyperref the pdf viewer has to guess where links are by looking in the page stream - it is quite possible that this heuristic fails if you add or remove stuff to the page.

    – Ulrike Fischer
    Mar 1 at 21:00











  • Oh I see. Would never suspect that such clever heuristics were involved...

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 1 at 21:02


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














You should use hyperref and url if you want real links:



documentclass{amsart}

usepackage{amsrefs}
usepackage{hyperref}
begin{document}

$binom nk$

begin{biblist}
bib{E}{misc}{
author={Noam D. Elkies (https://mathoverflow.net/users/14830/noam-d-elkies)},
note={URL: url{https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198} (version: 2018-10-19)}
}
end{biblist}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer
























  • Yes it works that way, thank you. However let me point out that without that $binom nk$ it also worked without hyperref and without the url{...}

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 1 at 20:53






  • 1





    Without hyperref the pdf viewer has to guess where links are by looking in the page stream - it is quite possible that this heuristic fails if you add or remove stuff to the page.

    – Ulrike Fischer
    Mar 1 at 21:00











  • Oh I see. Would never suspect that such clever heuristics were involved...

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 1 at 21:02
















3














You should use hyperref and url if you want real links:



documentclass{amsart}

usepackage{amsrefs}
usepackage{hyperref}
begin{document}

$binom nk$

begin{biblist}
bib{E}{misc}{
author={Noam D. Elkies (https://mathoverflow.net/users/14830/noam-d-elkies)},
note={URL: url{https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198} (version: 2018-10-19)}
}
end{biblist}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer
























  • Yes it works that way, thank you. However let me point out that without that $binom nk$ it also worked without hyperref and without the url{...}

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 1 at 20:53






  • 1





    Without hyperref the pdf viewer has to guess where links are by looking in the page stream - it is quite possible that this heuristic fails if you add or remove stuff to the page.

    – Ulrike Fischer
    Mar 1 at 21:00











  • Oh I see. Would never suspect that such clever heuristics were involved...

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 1 at 21:02














3












3








3







You should use hyperref and url if you want real links:



documentclass{amsart}

usepackage{amsrefs}
usepackage{hyperref}
begin{document}

$binom nk$

begin{biblist}
bib{E}{misc}{
author={Noam D. Elkies (https://mathoverflow.net/users/14830/noam-d-elkies)},
note={URL: url{https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198} (version: 2018-10-19)}
}
end{biblist}
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer













You should use hyperref and url if you want real links:



documentclass{amsart}

usepackage{amsrefs}
usepackage{hyperref}
begin{document}

$binom nk$

begin{biblist}
bib{E}{misc}{
author={Noam D. Elkies (https://mathoverflow.net/users/14830/noam-d-elkies)},
note={URL: url{https://mathoverflow.net/q/313198} (version: 2018-10-19)}
}
end{biblist}
end{document}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 1 at 20:36









Ulrike FischerUlrike Fischer

194k8302688




194k8302688













  • Yes it works that way, thank you. However let me point out that without that $binom nk$ it also worked without hyperref and without the url{...}

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 1 at 20:53






  • 1





    Without hyperref the pdf viewer has to guess where links are by looking in the page stream - it is quite possible that this heuristic fails if you add or remove stuff to the page.

    – Ulrike Fischer
    Mar 1 at 21:00











  • Oh I see. Would never suspect that such clever heuristics were involved...

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 1 at 21:02



















  • Yes it works that way, thank you. However let me point out that without that $binom nk$ it also worked without hyperref and without the url{...}

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 1 at 20:53






  • 1





    Without hyperref the pdf viewer has to guess where links are by looking in the page stream - it is quite possible that this heuristic fails if you add or remove stuff to the page.

    – Ulrike Fischer
    Mar 1 at 21:00











  • Oh I see. Would never suspect that such clever heuristics were involved...

    – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
    Mar 1 at 21:02

















Yes it works that way, thank you. However let me point out that without that $binom nk$ it also worked without hyperref and without the url{...}

– მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
Mar 1 at 20:53





Yes it works that way, thank you. However let me point out that without that $binom nk$ it also worked without hyperref and without the url{...}

– მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
Mar 1 at 20:53




1




1





Without hyperref the pdf viewer has to guess where links are by looking in the page stream - it is quite possible that this heuristic fails if you add or remove stuff to the page.

– Ulrike Fischer
Mar 1 at 21:00





Without hyperref the pdf viewer has to guess where links are by looking in the page stream - it is quite possible that this heuristic fails if you add or remove stuff to the page.

– Ulrike Fischer
Mar 1 at 21:00













Oh I see. Would never suspect that such clever heuristics were involved...

– მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
Mar 1 at 21:02





Oh I see. Would never suspect that such clever heuristics were involved...

– მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
Mar 1 at 21:02



Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?