Extracting numeric values from a string containing key:value pairs












5












$begingroup$


I am writing function numericValues(text: String): List[Int] to extract patterns """([a-z]+)s*:s*(d+)""" and return the list of the numeric values :



numericValues("a123 : 0 abc:123 123:abc xyz:1") // List(123, 1)


I would write numericValues like this:



def numericValues(text: String): List[Int] = {
val regex = """([a-z]+)s*:s*(d+)""".r
regex.findAllIn(text).toList.flatMap {s =>
PartialFunction.condOpt(s) { case regex(_, num) => num.toInt }
}
}


I guess the condOpt invocation is redundant and I wonder how to simplify this implementation. Also, I'd appreciate comments on improvements to style and best practice.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    5












    $begingroup$


    I am writing function numericValues(text: String): List[Int] to extract patterns """([a-z]+)s*:s*(d+)""" and return the list of the numeric values :



    numericValues("a123 : 0 abc:123 123:abc xyz:1") // List(123, 1)


    I would write numericValues like this:



    def numericValues(text: String): List[Int] = {
    val regex = """([a-z]+)s*:s*(d+)""".r
    regex.findAllIn(text).toList.flatMap {s =>
    PartialFunction.condOpt(s) { case regex(_, num) => num.toInt }
    }
    }


    I guess the condOpt invocation is redundant and I wonder how to simplify this implementation. Also, I'd appreciate comments on improvements to style and best practice.










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$


      I am writing function numericValues(text: String): List[Int] to extract patterns """([a-z]+)s*:s*(d+)""" and return the list of the numeric values :



      numericValues("a123 : 0 abc:123 123:abc xyz:1") // List(123, 1)


      I would write numericValues like this:



      def numericValues(text: String): List[Int] = {
      val regex = """([a-z]+)s*:s*(d+)""".r
      regex.findAllIn(text).toList.flatMap {s =>
      PartialFunction.condOpt(s) { case regex(_, num) => num.toInt }
      }
      }


      I guess the condOpt invocation is redundant and I wonder how to simplify this implementation. Also, I'd appreciate comments on improvements to style and best practice.










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am writing function numericValues(text: String): List[Int] to extract patterns """([a-z]+)s*:s*(d+)""" and return the list of the numeric values :



      numericValues("a123 : 0 abc:123 123:abc xyz:1") // List(123, 1)


      I would write numericValues like this:



      def numericValues(text: String): List[Int] = {
      val regex = """([a-z]+)s*:s*(d+)""".r
      regex.findAllIn(text).toList.flatMap {s =>
      PartialFunction.condOpt(s) { case regex(_, num) => num.toInt }
      }
      }


      I guess the condOpt invocation is redundant and I wonder how to simplify this implementation. Also, I'd appreciate comments on improvements to style and best practice.







      regex scala






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 20 at 21:30







      Michael

















      asked Mar 20 at 10:20









      MichaelMichael

      1285




      1285






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7












          $begingroup$

          You usually want a zero-width word boundary b on either end of the regex, to avoid matching things like 1a:1a.



          There's no need to capture [a-z]+ since you are throwing it away.



          You can use lookbehind (?<=…) assertions to require a match to be preceded by whatever, without including the whatever in the match result. This means no need for capturing parenthesis, only the integer is included in the match, and the final map is simply _.toInt. Variable-width lookbehind was introduced in Java 9; older versions have only fixed-width lookbehind.



          Finally, removing the variable makes braces unnecessary.



          def numericValues(text: String): List[Int] = """(?<=b[a-z]+s*:s*)d+b""".r.findAllIn(text).toList.map(_.toInt)


          With only fixed-width lookbehind, you could postprocess the matches to remove non-numerics:



          ….map(_.replaceAll("[^0-9]", "").toInt)


          Or, more idiomatically and less hacky, just capture the digits and extract the capture groups:



          """b[a-z]+s*:s*(d+)b""".r.findAllIn(text).matchData.toList.map(_.group(1).toInt)





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot. What if I have only fixed-width lookbehind ?
            $endgroup$
            – Michael
            Mar 20 at 13:00






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            then you can't use variable-width lookbehind :) See edit.
            $endgroup$
            – Oh My Goodness
            Mar 20 at 13:56












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "196"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215831%2fextracting-numeric-values-from-a-string-containing-keyvalue-pairs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7












          $begingroup$

          You usually want a zero-width word boundary b on either end of the regex, to avoid matching things like 1a:1a.



          There's no need to capture [a-z]+ since you are throwing it away.



          You can use lookbehind (?<=…) assertions to require a match to be preceded by whatever, without including the whatever in the match result. This means no need for capturing parenthesis, only the integer is included in the match, and the final map is simply _.toInt. Variable-width lookbehind was introduced in Java 9; older versions have only fixed-width lookbehind.



          Finally, removing the variable makes braces unnecessary.



          def numericValues(text: String): List[Int] = """(?<=b[a-z]+s*:s*)d+b""".r.findAllIn(text).toList.map(_.toInt)


          With only fixed-width lookbehind, you could postprocess the matches to remove non-numerics:



          ….map(_.replaceAll("[^0-9]", "").toInt)


          Or, more idiomatically and less hacky, just capture the digits and extract the capture groups:



          """b[a-z]+s*:s*(d+)b""".r.findAllIn(text).matchData.toList.map(_.group(1).toInt)





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot. What if I have only fixed-width lookbehind ?
            $endgroup$
            – Michael
            Mar 20 at 13:00






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            then you can't use variable-width lookbehind :) See edit.
            $endgroup$
            – Oh My Goodness
            Mar 20 at 13:56
















          7












          $begingroup$

          You usually want a zero-width word boundary b on either end of the regex, to avoid matching things like 1a:1a.



          There's no need to capture [a-z]+ since you are throwing it away.



          You can use lookbehind (?<=…) assertions to require a match to be preceded by whatever, without including the whatever in the match result. This means no need for capturing parenthesis, only the integer is included in the match, and the final map is simply _.toInt. Variable-width lookbehind was introduced in Java 9; older versions have only fixed-width lookbehind.



          Finally, removing the variable makes braces unnecessary.



          def numericValues(text: String): List[Int] = """(?<=b[a-z]+s*:s*)d+b""".r.findAllIn(text).toList.map(_.toInt)


          With only fixed-width lookbehind, you could postprocess the matches to remove non-numerics:



          ….map(_.replaceAll("[^0-9]", "").toInt)


          Or, more idiomatically and less hacky, just capture the digits and extract the capture groups:



          """b[a-z]+s*:s*(d+)b""".r.findAllIn(text).matchData.toList.map(_.group(1).toInt)





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot. What if I have only fixed-width lookbehind ?
            $endgroup$
            – Michael
            Mar 20 at 13:00






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            then you can't use variable-width lookbehind :) See edit.
            $endgroup$
            – Oh My Goodness
            Mar 20 at 13:56














          7












          7








          7





          $begingroup$

          You usually want a zero-width word boundary b on either end of the regex, to avoid matching things like 1a:1a.



          There's no need to capture [a-z]+ since you are throwing it away.



          You can use lookbehind (?<=…) assertions to require a match to be preceded by whatever, without including the whatever in the match result. This means no need for capturing parenthesis, only the integer is included in the match, and the final map is simply _.toInt. Variable-width lookbehind was introduced in Java 9; older versions have only fixed-width lookbehind.



          Finally, removing the variable makes braces unnecessary.



          def numericValues(text: String): List[Int] = """(?<=b[a-z]+s*:s*)d+b""".r.findAllIn(text).toList.map(_.toInt)


          With only fixed-width lookbehind, you could postprocess the matches to remove non-numerics:



          ….map(_.replaceAll("[^0-9]", "").toInt)


          Or, more idiomatically and less hacky, just capture the digits and extract the capture groups:



          """b[a-z]+s*:s*(d+)b""".r.findAllIn(text).matchData.toList.map(_.group(1).toInt)





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          You usually want a zero-width word boundary b on either end of the regex, to avoid matching things like 1a:1a.



          There's no need to capture [a-z]+ since you are throwing it away.



          You can use lookbehind (?<=…) assertions to require a match to be preceded by whatever, without including the whatever in the match result. This means no need for capturing parenthesis, only the integer is included in the match, and the final map is simply _.toInt. Variable-width lookbehind was introduced in Java 9; older versions have only fixed-width lookbehind.



          Finally, removing the variable makes braces unnecessary.



          def numericValues(text: String): List[Int] = """(?<=b[a-z]+s*:s*)d+b""".r.findAllIn(text).toList.map(_.toInt)


          With only fixed-width lookbehind, you could postprocess the matches to remove non-numerics:



          ….map(_.replaceAll("[^0-9]", "").toInt)


          Or, more idiomatically and less hacky, just capture the digits and extract the capture groups:



          """b[a-z]+s*:s*(d+)b""".r.findAllIn(text).matchData.toList.map(_.group(1).toInt)






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 20 at 13:54

























          answered Mar 20 at 12:35









          Oh My GoodnessOh My Goodness

          1,984315




          1,984315












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot. What if I have only fixed-width lookbehind ?
            $endgroup$
            – Michael
            Mar 20 at 13:00






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            then you can't use variable-width lookbehind :) See edit.
            $endgroup$
            – Oh My Goodness
            Mar 20 at 13:56


















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks a lot. What if I have only fixed-width lookbehind ?
            $endgroup$
            – Michael
            Mar 20 at 13:00






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            then you can't use variable-width lookbehind :) See edit.
            $endgroup$
            – Oh My Goodness
            Mar 20 at 13:56
















          $begingroup$
          Thanks a lot. What if I have only fixed-width lookbehind ?
          $endgroup$
          – Michael
          Mar 20 at 13:00




          $begingroup$
          Thanks a lot. What if I have only fixed-width lookbehind ?
          $endgroup$
          – Michael
          Mar 20 at 13:00




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          then you can't use variable-width lookbehind :) See edit.
          $endgroup$
          – Oh My Goodness
          Mar 20 at 13:56




          $begingroup$
          then you can't use variable-width lookbehind :) See edit.
          $endgroup$
          – Oh My Goodness
          Mar 20 at 13:56


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215831%2fextracting-numeric-values-from-a-string-containing-keyvalue-pairs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

          ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

          Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?