Apollo React Nested Query & Mutation












2















I have a component that I'd like to fetch data for a profile and allow posting messages on the same view. I've created a simple profile component here, and have the mutation set within the query, similar to the Apollo React tutorial.



When I run this, I get a properly rendered query with data. When the button is pressed, the mutation occurs but the page re-renders with an empty object in the Query's data parameter and the page errors with Cannot read property 'name' of undefined (which is expected given a blank data object).



Is there a better approach here?



const GET_PROFILE = gql`
query GetProfileQuery($profileId: ID!) {
getProfileInfo(profileId: $profileId) {
name
}
}
`;

const ADD_ENDORSEMENT = gql`
mutation AddEndorsement($profileId: ID!, $body: String!) {
addEndorsement(profileId: $profileId, body: $body) {
endorsementId
}
}
`;

const Profile = props => {
const profileId = props.match.params.profileId;
return (
<Query query={GET_PROFILE} variables={{ profileId: profileId }}>
{({ loading, error, data }) => {
if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>;
if (error) return <p>Error :(</p>;
return (
<Fragment>
<h1>Welcome {data.getProfileInfo.name}</h1>
<Mutation mutation={ADD_ENDORSEMENT}>
{(addEndorsement, { loading, error }) => (
<div>
<button
onClick={e => {
addEndorsement({
variables: {
profileId: profileId,
body: "This is a test."
}
});
}}
>
Save
</button>
{loading && <p>Loading...</p>}
{error && <p>Error :(</p>}
</div>
)}
</Mutation>
</Fragment>
);
}}
</Query>
);
};









share|improve this question

























  • apollographql.com/docs/react/recipes/recompose.html

    – xadm
    Nov 21 '18 at 17:50
















2















I have a component that I'd like to fetch data for a profile and allow posting messages on the same view. I've created a simple profile component here, and have the mutation set within the query, similar to the Apollo React tutorial.



When I run this, I get a properly rendered query with data. When the button is pressed, the mutation occurs but the page re-renders with an empty object in the Query's data parameter and the page errors with Cannot read property 'name' of undefined (which is expected given a blank data object).



Is there a better approach here?



const GET_PROFILE = gql`
query GetProfileQuery($profileId: ID!) {
getProfileInfo(profileId: $profileId) {
name
}
}
`;

const ADD_ENDORSEMENT = gql`
mutation AddEndorsement($profileId: ID!, $body: String!) {
addEndorsement(profileId: $profileId, body: $body) {
endorsementId
}
}
`;

const Profile = props => {
const profileId = props.match.params.profileId;
return (
<Query query={GET_PROFILE} variables={{ profileId: profileId }}>
{({ loading, error, data }) => {
if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>;
if (error) return <p>Error :(</p>;
return (
<Fragment>
<h1>Welcome {data.getProfileInfo.name}</h1>
<Mutation mutation={ADD_ENDORSEMENT}>
{(addEndorsement, { loading, error }) => (
<div>
<button
onClick={e => {
addEndorsement({
variables: {
profileId: profileId,
body: "This is a test."
}
});
}}
>
Save
</button>
{loading && <p>Loading...</p>}
{error && <p>Error :(</p>}
</div>
)}
</Mutation>
</Fragment>
);
}}
</Query>
);
};









share|improve this question

























  • apollographql.com/docs/react/recipes/recompose.html

    – xadm
    Nov 21 '18 at 17:50














2












2








2








I have a component that I'd like to fetch data for a profile and allow posting messages on the same view. I've created a simple profile component here, and have the mutation set within the query, similar to the Apollo React tutorial.



When I run this, I get a properly rendered query with data. When the button is pressed, the mutation occurs but the page re-renders with an empty object in the Query's data parameter and the page errors with Cannot read property 'name' of undefined (which is expected given a blank data object).



Is there a better approach here?



const GET_PROFILE = gql`
query GetProfileQuery($profileId: ID!) {
getProfileInfo(profileId: $profileId) {
name
}
}
`;

const ADD_ENDORSEMENT = gql`
mutation AddEndorsement($profileId: ID!, $body: String!) {
addEndorsement(profileId: $profileId, body: $body) {
endorsementId
}
}
`;

const Profile = props => {
const profileId = props.match.params.profileId;
return (
<Query query={GET_PROFILE} variables={{ profileId: profileId }}>
{({ loading, error, data }) => {
if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>;
if (error) return <p>Error :(</p>;
return (
<Fragment>
<h1>Welcome {data.getProfileInfo.name}</h1>
<Mutation mutation={ADD_ENDORSEMENT}>
{(addEndorsement, { loading, error }) => (
<div>
<button
onClick={e => {
addEndorsement({
variables: {
profileId: profileId,
body: "This is a test."
}
});
}}
>
Save
</button>
{loading && <p>Loading...</p>}
{error && <p>Error :(</p>}
</div>
)}
</Mutation>
</Fragment>
);
}}
</Query>
);
};









share|improve this question
















I have a component that I'd like to fetch data for a profile and allow posting messages on the same view. I've created a simple profile component here, and have the mutation set within the query, similar to the Apollo React tutorial.



When I run this, I get a properly rendered query with data. When the button is pressed, the mutation occurs but the page re-renders with an empty object in the Query's data parameter and the page errors with Cannot read property 'name' of undefined (which is expected given a blank data object).



Is there a better approach here?



const GET_PROFILE = gql`
query GetProfileQuery($profileId: ID!) {
getProfileInfo(profileId: $profileId) {
name
}
}
`;

const ADD_ENDORSEMENT = gql`
mutation AddEndorsement($profileId: ID!, $body: String!) {
addEndorsement(profileId: $profileId, body: $body) {
endorsementId
}
}
`;

const Profile = props => {
const profileId = props.match.params.profileId;
return (
<Query query={GET_PROFILE} variables={{ profileId: profileId }}>
{({ loading, error, data }) => {
if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>;
if (error) return <p>Error :(</p>;
return (
<Fragment>
<h1>Welcome {data.getProfileInfo.name}</h1>
<Mutation mutation={ADD_ENDORSEMENT}>
{(addEndorsement, { loading, error }) => (
<div>
<button
onClick={e => {
addEndorsement({
variables: {
profileId: profileId,
body: "This is a test."
}
});
}}
>
Save
</button>
{loading && <p>Loading...</p>}
{error && <p>Error :(</p>}
</div>
)}
</Mutation>
</Fragment>
);
}}
</Query>
);
};






reactjs graphql react-apollo apollo-client






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 22 '18 at 9:38









Raza Rafaideen

6131620




6131620










asked Nov 21 '18 at 17:32









BobBrezBobBrez

595519




595519













  • apollographql.com/docs/react/recipes/recompose.html

    – xadm
    Nov 21 '18 at 17:50



















  • apollographql.com/docs/react/recipes/recompose.html

    – xadm
    Nov 21 '18 at 17:50

















apollographql.com/docs/react/recipes/recompose.html

– xadm
Nov 21 '18 at 17:50





apollographql.com/docs/react/recipes/recompose.html

– xadm
Nov 21 '18 at 17:50












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














I had a similar issue were data turned up undefined. In my case the problem was caused by a Query subscribeToMore option I was using invalidating the cache by silently failing to merge the updated data into the original Query results (it did not contain exactly identical data fields).



The question doesn't mention subscriptions, but it will be a similar cache invalidation problem.



To fix I'd first try making sure the Query and Mutation's return identical data.



If that doesn't resolve, then depending on responsiveness needs either look at the "refetchQueries/awaitRefetchQueries" to refresh the Query, or manually poking the updated data into the local cache with "update" options on the Mutation.



Good luck.






share|improve this answer































    0














    Try adding the following to the onClick mutation, it should help avoid needing to update the cache manually, although that would be the next step. You can pass just the string name of the query to refetchQueries, you don't need to pass the actual query there. Another trick is to ensure you are getting the same fields back so the cache object matches, (not sure what type you are returning on the query/mutation.



    onClick={e => {
    addEndorsement({
    variables: {
    profileId: profileId,
    body: 'This is a test.',
    },
    refetchQueries: ['GetProfileQuery']
    })
    }}





    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53417671%2fapollo-react-nested-query-mutation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      I had a similar issue were data turned up undefined. In my case the problem was caused by a Query subscribeToMore option I was using invalidating the cache by silently failing to merge the updated data into the original Query results (it did not contain exactly identical data fields).



      The question doesn't mention subscriptions, but it will be a similar cache invalidation problem.



      To fix I'd first try making sure the Query and Mutation's return identical data.



      If that doesn't resolve, then depending on responsiveness needs either look at the "refetchQueries/awaitRefetchQueries" to refresh the Query, or manually poking the updated data into the local cache with "update" options on the Mutation.



      Good luck.






      share|improve this answer




























        1














        I had a similar issue were data turned up undefined. In my case the problem was caused by a Query subscribeToMore option I was using invalidating the cache by silently failing to merge the updated data into the original Query results (it did not contain exactly identical data fields).



        The question doesn't mention subscriptions, but it will be a similar cache invalidation problem.



        To fix I'd first try making sure the Query and Mutation's return identical data.



        If that doesn't resolve, then depending on responsiveness needs either look at the "refetchQueries/awaitRefetchQueries" to refresh the Query, or manually poking the updated data into the local cache with "update" options on the Mutation.



        Good luck.






        share|improve this answer


























          1












          1








          1







          I had a similar issue were data turned up undefined. In my case the problem was caused by a Query subscribeToMore option I was using invalidating the cache by silently failing to merge the updated data into the original Query results (it did not contain exactly identical data fields).



          The question doesn't mention subscriptions, but it will be a similar cache invalidation problem.



          To fix I'd first try making sure the Query and Mutation's return identical data.



          If that doesn't resolve, then depending on responsiveness needs either look at the "refetchQueries/awaitRefetchQueries" to refresh the Query, or manually poking the updated data into the local cache with "update" options on the Mutation.



          Good luck.






          share|improve this answer













          I had a similar issue were data turned up undefined. In my case the problem was caused by a Query subscribeToMore option I was using invalidating the cache by silently failing to merge the updated data into the original Query results (it did not contain exactly identical data fields).



          The question doesn't mention subscriptions, but it will be a similar cache invalidation problem.



          To fix I'd first try making sure the Query and Mutation's return identical data.



          If that doesn't resolve, then depending on responsiveness needs either look at the "refetchQueries/awaitRefetchQueries" to refresh the Query, or manually poking the updated data into the local cache with "update" options on the Mutation.



          Good luck.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 30 '18 at 14:38









          shufflingbshufflingb

          515




          515

























              0














              Try adding the following to the onClick mutation, it should help avoid needing to update the cache manually, although that would be the next step. You can pass just the string name of the query to refetchQueries, you don't need to pass the actual query there. Another trick is to ensure you are getting the same fields back so the cache object matches, (not sure what type you are returning on the query/mutation.



              onClick={e => {
              addEndorsement({
              variables: {
              profileId: profileId,
              body: 'This is a test.',
              },
              refetchQueries: ['GetProfileQuery']
              })
              }}





              share|improve this answer




























                0














                Try adding the following to the onClick mutation, it should help avoid needing to update the cache manually, although that would be the next step. You can pass just the string name of the query to refetchQueries, you don't need to pass the actual query there. Another trick is to ensure you are getting the same fields back so the cache object matches, (not sure what type you are returning on the query/mutation.



                onClick={e => {
                addEndorsement({
                variables: {
                profileId: profileId,
                body: 'This is a test.',
                },
                refetchQueries: ['GetProfileQuery']
                })
                }}





                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  Try adding the following to the onClick mutation, it should help avoid needing to update the cache manually, although that would be the next step. You can pass just the string name of the query to refetchQueries, you don't need to pass the actual query there. Another trick is to ensure you are getting the same fields back so the cache object matches, (not sure what type you are returning on the query/mutation.



                  onClick={e => {
                  addEndorsement({
                  variables: {
                  profileId: profileId,
                  body: 'This is a test.',
                  },
                  refetchQueries: ['GetProfileQuery']
                  })
                  }}





                  share|improve this answer













                  Try adding the following to the onClick mutation, it should help avoid needing to update the cache manually, although that would be the next step. You can pass just the string name of the query to refetchQueries, you don't need to pass the actual query there. Another trick is to ensure you are getting the same fields back so the cache object matches, (not sure what type you are returning on the query/mutation.



                  onClick={e => {
                  addEndorsement({
                  variables: {
                  profileId: profileId,
                  body: 'This is a test.',
                  },
                  refetchQueries: ['GetProfileQuery']
                  })
                  }}






                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 1 '18 at 16:03









                  Stephen RichardsonStephen Richardson

                  11




                  11






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53417671%2fapollo-react-nested-query-mutation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                      ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                      Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?