Solving $x^2 equiv 140 pmod{221}$ [duplicate]












2












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Find all solutions to $x^2equiv 1pmod {91}$

    3 answers




I'm stuck with the last part of this question: solve $x^2 equiv 140 pmod{221}$.



We know that $140 = 7 times2^2times5$ and $221 = 13 times 17$.



We split the original congruence in two, so we have:



$x^2 equiv 140 pmod{13}$



$x^2 equiv 140 pmod{17}$



Applying the properties of moduli we have:



$x^2 equiv 10pmod{13} rightarrow x=pm6$



$x^2 equiv 4pmod{17} rightarrow x=pm2$



After this point, it's not clear for me how I can arrive to the complete solution. Any advice?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Nosrati, Bill Dubuque elementary-number-theory
Users with the  elementary-number-theory badge can single-handedly close elementary-number-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 3 '18 at 17:26


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















  • $begingroup$
    mathworld.wolfram.com/ChineseRemainderTheorem.html
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:01










  • $begingroup$
    See also: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3019723/…
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:02






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See also here and here
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Dubuque
    Dec 3 '18 at 17:28
















2












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Find all solutions to $x^2equiv 1pmod {91}$

    3 answers




I'm stuck with the last part of this question: solve $x^2 equiv 140 pmod{221}$.



We know that $140 = 7 times2^2times5$ and $221 = 13 times 17$.



We split the original congruence in two, so we have:



$x^2 equiv 140 pmod{13}$



$x^2 equiv 140 pmod{17}$



Applying the properties of moduli we have:



$x^2 equiv 10pmod{13} rightarrow x=pm6$



$x^2 equiv 4pmod{17} rightarrow x=pm2$



After this point, it's not clear for me how I can arrive to the complete solution. Any advice?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Nosrati, Bill Dubuque elementary-number-theory
Users with the  elementary-number-theory badge can single-handedly close elementary-number-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 3 '18 at 17:26


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















  • $begingroup$
    mathworld.wolfram.com/ChineseRemainderTheorem.html
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:01










  • $begingroup$
    See also: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3019723/…
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:02






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See also here and here
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Dubuque
    Dec 3 '18 at 17:28














2












2








2





$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Find all solutions to $x^2equiv 1pmod {91}$

    3 answers




I'm stuck with the last part of this question: solve $x^2 equiv 140 pmod{221}$.



We know that $140 = 7 times2^2times5$ and $221 = 13 times 17$.



We split the original congruence in two, so we have:



$x^2 equiv 140 pmod{13}$



$x^2 equiv 140 pmod{17}$



Applying the properties of moduli we have:



$x^2 equiv 10pmod{13} rightarrow x=pm6$



$x^2 equiv 4pmod{17} rightarrow x=pm2$



After this point, it's not clear for me how I can arrive to the complete solution. Any advice?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:




  • Find all solutions to $x^2equiv 1pmod {91}$

    3 answers




I'm stuck with the last part of this question: solve $x^2 equiv 140 pmod{221}$.



We know that $140 = 7 times2^2times5$ and $221 = 13 times 17$.



We split the original congruence in two, so we have:



$x^2 equiv 140 pmod{13}$



$x^2 equiv 140 pmod{17}$



Applying the properties of moduli we have:



$x^2 equiv 10pmod{13} rightarrow x=pm6$



$x^2 equiv 4pmod{17} rightarrow x=pm2$



After this point, it's not clear for me how I can arrive to the complete solution. Any advice?





This question already has an answer here:




  • Find all solutions to $x^2equiv 1pmod {91}$

    3 answers








elementary-number-theory modular-arithmetic






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 3 '18 at 9:55









Ruslan

3,72721533




3,72721533










asked Dec 3 '18 at 9:47









AlessarAlessar

313115




313115




marked as duplicate by Nosrati, Bill Dubuque elementary-number-theory
Users with the  elementary-number-theory badge can single-handedly close elementary-number-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 3 '18 at 17:26


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by Nosrati, Bill Dubuque elementary-number-theory
Users with the  elementary-number-theory badge can single-handedly close elementary-number-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 3 '18 at 17:26


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • $begingroup$
    mathworld.wolfram.com/ChineseRemainderTheorem.html
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:01










  • $begingroup$
    See also: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3019723/…
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:02






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See also here and here
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Dubuque
    Dec 3 '18 at 17:28


















  • $begingroup$
    mathworld.wolfram.com/ChineseRemainderTheorem.html
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:01










  • $begingroup$
    See also: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3019723/…
    $endgroup$
    – lab bhattacharjee
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:02






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    See also here and here
    $endgroup$
    – Bill Dubuque
    Dec 3 '18 at 17:28
















$begingroup$
mathworld.wolfram.com/ChineseRemainderTheorem.html
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 3 '18 at 10:01




$begingroup$
mathworld.wolfram.com/ChineseRemainderTheorem.html
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 3 '18 at 10:01












$begingroup$
See also: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3019723/…
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 3 '18 at 10:02




$begingroup$
See also: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3019723/…
$endgroup$
– lab bhattacharjee
Dec 3 '18 at 10:02




1




1




$begingroup$
See also here and here
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Dec 3 '18 at 17:28




$begingroup$
See also here and here
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Dec 3 '18 at 17:28










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Now you use the Chinese Remainder Theorem. For instance, let $xinmathbb Z$ be such that $xequiv6pmod{13}$ and that $xequiv-2pmod{17}$. Since $13$ and $17$ are coprime, there are integers $alpha$ and $beta$ such that $13alpha+17beta=1$. Using the generalized Euclid algorithm, you get that, for instance, $1=4times13-3times17$. Therefore,$$8=6-(-2)=32times13-24times17.$$So,$$6-32times13=-2-24times17(=-410).$$So, take this number: $-410$. Or, better still, take $32$ ($-410equiv32pmod{221}$).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, very clear. So with the CRT I can combine the final solutions to obtain the desired answer. I must pass for the Euclide algorithm or there are other methods?
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think that using the Euclid algorithm is the natural way to do it.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:09










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:14








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    From $6-2=17times(-12)+13times16$, you should have deduced that $$6-13times16=2+17times(-12)=-202equiv9pmod{221}.$$
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:57





















1












$begingroup$

Note that
$$x^2 -140equiv x^2 -140-221=x^2−19^2=(x-19)(x+19)pmod{221}.$$
It follows that
$$xequiv pm 19equiv pm 6 pmod{13}quadtext{and}quad xequiv pm 19equiv pm 2 pmod{17}.$$ Hence we have four solutions (actually we already have two of them, i.e. $19$ and $-19$) that can be obtained by using the Chinese Remainder Theorem:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}\
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

Can you take it from here?



P.S. By the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and all you need is to solve just ONE system:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

if $m$ is the solution then the fourth one is $-m$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I think I can, it's like solving a diophantine equation for each combination. Thanks for the answer, wish I could give two "correct answer" flag instead of one
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar Actually here we have to solve just ONE system because, by the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and the fourth one is the opposite of the first one . As regards the flag, don't worry, I am fine with your choice.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:16












  • $begingroup$
    thanks, you guys are so prepared and professional. Ok so $pm 19$ are two solutions, and another one will be the solution of the other two system. The absolute values are two but specular, so 4 systems, 2 requested for the final solution
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:18








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I edited my answer with a P.S. have a nice day!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Dear downvoter, what's the problem with my answer? If there is something wrong please help me to improve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:06


















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Now you use the Chinese Remainder Theorem. For instance, let $xinmathbb Z$ be such that $xequiv6pmod{13}$ and that $xequiv-2pmod{17}$. Since $13$ and $17$ are coprime, there are integers $alpha$ and $beta$ such that $13alpha+17beta=1$. Using the generalized Euclid algorithm, you get that, for instance, $1=4times13-3times17$. Therefore,$$8=6-(-2)=32times13-24times17.$$So,$$6-32times13=-2-24times17(=-410).$$So, take this number: $-410$. Or, better still, take $32$ ($-410equiv32pmod{221}$).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, very clear. So with the CRT I can combine the final solutions to obtain the desired answer. I must pass for the Euclide algorithm or there are other methods?
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think that using the Euclid algorithm is the natural way to do it.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:09










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:14








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    From $6-2=17times(-12)+13times16$, you should have deduced that $$6-13times16=2+17times(-12)=-202equiv9pmod{221}.$$
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:57


















1












$begingroup$

Now you use the Chinese Remainder Theorem. For instance, let $xinmathbb Z$ be such that $xequiv6pmod{13}$ and that $xequiv-2pmod{17}$. Since $13$ and $17$ are coprime, there are integers $alpha$ and $beta$ such that $13alpha+17beta=1$. Using the generalized Euclid algorithm, you get that, for instance, $1=4times13-3times17$. Therefore,$$8=6-(-2)=32times13-24times17.$$So,$$6-32times13=-2-24times17(=-410).$$So, take this number: $-410$. Or, better still, take $32$ ($-410equiv32pmod{221}$).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, very clear. So with the CRT I can combine the final solutions to obtain the desired answer. I must pass for the Euclide algorithm or there are other methods?
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think that using the Euclid algorithm is the natural way to do it.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:09










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:14








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    From $6-2=17times(-12)+13times16$, you should have deduced that $$6-13times16=2+17times(-12)=-202equiv9pmod{221}.$$
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:57
















1












1








1





$begingroup$

Now you use the Chinese Remainder Theorem. For instance, let $xinmathbb Z$ be such that $xequiv6pmod{13}$ and that $xequiv-2pmod{17}$. Since $13$ and $17$ are coprime, there are integers $alpha$ and $beta$ such that $13alpha+17beta=1$. Using the generalized Euclid algorithm, you get that, for instance, $1=4times13-3times17$. Therefore,$$8=6-(-2)=32times13-24times17.$$So,$$6-32times13=-2-24times17(=-410).$$So, take this number: $-410$. Or, better still, take $32$ ($-410equiv32pmod{221}$).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Now you use the Chinese Remainder Theorem. For instance, let $xinmathbb Z$ be such that $xequiv6pmod{13}$ and that $xequiv-2pmod{17}$. Since $13$ and $17$ are coprime, there are integers $alpha$ and $beta$ such that $13alpha+17beta=1$. Using the generalized Euclid algorithm, you get that, for instance, $1=4times13-3times17$. Therefore,$$8=6-(-2)=32times13-24times17.$$So,$$6-32times13=-2-24times17(=-410).$$So, take this number: $-410$. Or, better still, take $32$ ($-410equiv32pmod{221}$).







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 3 '18 at 10:54

























answered Dec 3 '18 at 10:06









José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

163k22130233




163k22130233












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, very clear. So with the CRT I can combine the final solutions to obtain the desired answer. I must pass for the Euclide algorithm or there are other methods?
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think that using the Euclid algorithm is the natural way to do it.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:09










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:14








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    From $6-2=17times(-12)+13times16$, you should have deduced that $$6-13times16=2+17times(-12)=-202equiv9pmod{221}.$$
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:57




















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, very clear. So with the CRT I can combine the final solutions to obtain the desired answer. I must pass for the Euclide algorithm or there are other methods?
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think that using the Euclid algorithm is the natural way to do it.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:09










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:14








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    From $6-2=17times(-12)+13times16$, you should have deduced that $$6-13times16=2+17times(-12)=-202equiv9pmod{221}.$$
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:57


















$begingroup$
Thanks, very clear. So with the CRT I can combine the final solutions to obtain the desired answer. I must pass for the Euclide algorithm or there are other methods?
$endgroup$
– Alessar
Dec 3 '18 at 10:08




$begingroup$
Thanks, very clear. So with the CRT I can combine the final solutions to obtain the desired answer. I must pass for the Euclide algorithm or there are other methods?
$endgroup$
– Alessar
Dec 3 '18 at 10:08




1




1




$begingroup$
I think that using the Euclid algorithm is the natural way to do it.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 3 '18 at 10:09




$begingroup$
I think that using the Euclid algorithm is the natural way to do it.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 3 '18 at 10:09












$begingroup$
Thanks for the answer
$endgroup$
– Alessar
Dec 3 '18 at 10:14






$begingroup$
Thanks for the answer
$endgroup$
– Alessar
Dec 3 '18 at 10:14






1




1




$begingroup$
@Alessar I've edited my answer. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 3 '18 at 10:54




$begingroup$
@Alessar I've edited my answer. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 3 '18 at 10:54




1




1




$begingroup$
From $6-2=17times(-12)+13times16$, you should have deduced that $$6-13times16=2+17times(-12)=-202equiv9pmod{221}.$$
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 3 '18 at 11:57






$begingroup$
From $6-2=17times(-12)+13times16$, you should have deduced that $$6-13times16=2+17times(-12)=-202equiv9pmod{221}.$$
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 3 '18 at 11:57













1












$begingroup$

Note that
$$x^2 -140equiv x^2 -140-221=x^2−19^2=(x-19)(x+19)pmod{221}.$$
It follows that
$$xequiv pm 19equiv pm 6 pmod{13}quadtext{and}quad xequiv pm 19equiv pm 2 pmod{17}.$$ Hence we have four solutions (actually we already have two of them, i.e. $19$ and $-19$) that can be obtained by using the Chinese Remainder Theorem:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}\
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

Can you take it from here?



P.S. By the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and all you need is to solve just ONE system:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

if $m$ is the solution then the fourth one is $-m$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I think I can, it's like solving a diophantine equation for each combination. Thanks for the answer, wish I could give two "correct answer" flag instead of one
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar Actually here we have to solve just ONE system because, by the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and the fourth one is the opposite of the first one . As regards the flag, don't worry, I am fine with your choice.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:16












  • $begingroup$
    thanks, you guys are so prepared and professional. Ok so $pm 19$ are two solutions, and another one will be the solution of the other two system. The absolute values are two but specular, so 4 systems, 2 requested for the final solution
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:18








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I edited my answer with a P.S. have a nice day!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Dear downvoter, what's the problem with my answer? If there is something wrong please help me to improve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:06
















1












$begingroup$

Note that
$$x^2 -140equiv x^2 -140-221=x^2−19^2=(x-19)(x+19)pmod{221}.$$
It follows that
$$xequiv pm 19equiv pm 6 pmod{13}quadtext{and}quad xequiv pm 19equiv pm 2 pmod{17}.$$ Hence we have four solutions (actually we already have two of them, i.e. $19$ and $-19$) that can be obtained by using the Chinese Remainder Theorem:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}\
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

Can you take it from here?



P.S. By the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and all you need is to solve just ONE system:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

if $m$ is the solution then the fourth one is $-m$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I think I can, it's like solving a diophantine equation for each combination. Thanks for the answer, wish I could give two "correct answer" flag instead of one
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar Actually here we have to solve just ONE system because, by the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and the fourth one is the opposite of the first one . As regards the flag, don't worry, I am fine with your choice.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:16












  • $begingroup$
    thanks, you guys are so prepared and professional. Ok so $pm 19$ are two solutions, and another one will be the solution of the other two system. The absolute values are two but specular, so 4 systems, 2 requested for the final solution
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:18








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I edited my answer with a P.S. have a nice day!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Dear downvoter, what's the problem with my answer? If there is something wrong please help me to improve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:06














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Note that
$$x^2 -140equiv x^2 -140-221=x^2−19^2=(x-19)(x+19)pmod{221}.$$
It follows that
$$xequiv pm 19equiv pm 6 pmod{13}quadtext{and}quad xequiv pm 19equiv pm 2 pmod{17}.$$ Hence we have four solutions (actually we already have two of them, i.e. $19$ and $-19$) that can be obtained by using the Chinese Remainder Theorem:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}\
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

Can you take it from here?



P.S. By the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and all you need is to solve just ONE system:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

if $m$ is the solution then the fourth one is $-m$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Note that
$$x^2 -140equiv x^2 -140-221=x^2−19^2=(x-19)(x+19)pmod{221}.$$
It follows that
$$xequiv pm 19equiv pm 6 pmod{13}quadtext{and}quad xequiv pm 19equiv pm 2 pmod{17}.$$ Hence we have four solutions (actually we already have two of them, i.e. $19$ and $-19$) that can be obtained by using the Chinese Remainder Theorem:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}\
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv 2 pmod{17}
end{cases}quad
begin{cases}xequiv -6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

Can you take it from here?



P.S. By the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and all you need is to solve just ONE system:
$$begin{cases}xequiv 6 pmod{13}\
xequiv -2 pmod{17}
end{cases}$$

if $m$ is the solution then the fourth one is $-m$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 3 '18 at 10:19

























answered Dec 3 '18 at 9:54









Robert ZRobert Z

98.5k1068139




98.5k1068139












  • $begingroup$
    I think I can, it's like solving a diophantine equation for each combination. Thanks for the answer, wish I could give two "correct answer" flag instead of one
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar Actually here we have to solve just ONE system because, by the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and the fourth one is the opposite of the first one . As regards the flag, don't worry, I am fine with your choice.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:16












  • $begingroup$
    thanks, you guys are so prepared and professional. Ok so $pm 19$ are two solutions, and another one will be the solution of the other two system. The absolute values are two but specular, so 4 systems, 2 requested for the final solution
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:18








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I edited my answer with a P.S. have a nice day!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Dear downvoter, what's the problem with my answer? If there is something wrong please help me to improve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:06


















  • $begingroup$
    I think I can, it's like solving a diophantine equation for each combination. Thanks for the answer, wish I could give two "correct answer" flag instead of one
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar Actually here we have to solve just ONE system because, by the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and the fourth one is the opposite of the first one . As regards the flag, don't worry, I am fine with your choice.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:16












  • $begingroup$
    thanks, you guys are so prepared and professional. Ok so $pm 19$ are two solutions, and another one will be the solution of the other two system. The absolute values are two but specular, so 4 systems, 2 requested for the final solution
    $endgroup$
    – Alessar
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:18








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Alessar I edited my answer with a P.S. have a nice day!
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 10:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Dear downvoter, what's the problem with my answer? If there is something wrong please help me to improve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Dec 3 '18 at 11:06
















$begingroup$
I think I can, it's like solving a diophantine equation for each combination. Thanks for the answer, wish I could give two "correct answer" flag instead of one
$endgroup$
– Alessar
Dec 3 '18 at 10:12




$begingroup$
I think I can, it's like solving a diophantine equation for each combination. Thanks for the answer, wish I could give two "correct answer" flag instead of one
$endgroup$
– Alessar
Dec 3 '18 at 10:12




1




1




$begingroup$
@Alessar Actually here we have to solve just ONE system because, by the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and the fourth one is the opposite of the first one . As regards the flag, don't worry, I am fine with your choice.
$endgroup$
– Robert Z
Dec 3 '18 at 10:16






$begingroup$
@Alessar Actually here we have to solve just ONE system because, by the first remark, $pm 19$ are two solutions and the fourth one is the opposite of the first one . As regards the flag, don't worry, I am fine with your choice.
$endgroup$
– Robert Z
Dec 3 '18 at 10:16














$begingroup$
thanks, you guys are so prepared and professional. Ok so $pm 19$ are two solutions, and another one will be the solution of the other two system. The absolute values are two but specular, so 4 systems, 2 requested for the final solution
$endgroup$
– Alessar
Dec 3 '18 at 10:18






$begingroup$
thanks, you guys are so prepared and professional. Ok so $pm 19$ are two solutions, and another one will be the solution of the other two system. The absolute values are two but specular, so 4 systems, 2 requested for the final solution
$endgroup$
– Alessar
Dec 3 '18 at 10:18






1




1




$begingroup$
@Alessar I edited my answer with a P.S. have a nice day!
$endgroup$
– Robert Z
Dec 3 '18 at 10:29




$begingroup$
@Alessar I edited my answer with a P.S. have a nice day!
$endgroup$
– Robert Z
Dec 3 '18 at 10:29




1




1




$begingroup$
Dear downvoter, what's the problem with my answer? If there is something wrong please help me to improve it.
$endgroup$
– Robert Z
Dec 3 '18 at 11:06




$begingroup$
Dear downvoter, what's the problem with my answer? If there is something wrong please help me to improve it.
$endgroup$
– Robert Z
Dec 3 '18 at 11:06



Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?