Prove that $sec^2{theta}=(4xy)/(x+y)^2$ only when $x=y$












1















Show that the equation below is only possible when $x=y$
$$ sec^2{theta}=frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}$$






The only way I can think of doing this is by rewriting it as



$$ cos^2{theta}=frac{(x+y)^2}{4xy} $$
then using some inequalities to prove it by using:
$$ 0leq cos^2{theta}leq 1 ;; text{ therefore } ;; 0leq frac{(x+y)^2}{4xy}leq 1 $$
But I have an aversion to using case-based solutions (checking for $x>0$, $y>0$ etc.) since I feel there must be a neater solution to these kind of problems. So my question is: Is it possible to solve this and these sort of questions using techniques that don't involve checking numerous cases?










share|cite|improve this question



























    1















    Show that the equation below is only possible when $x=y$
    $$ sec^2{theta}=frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}$$






    The only way I can think of doing this is by rewriting it as



    $$ cos^2{theta}=frac{(x+y)^2}{4xy} $$
    then using some inequalities to prove it by using:
    $$ 0leq cos^2{theta}leq 1 ;; text{ therefore } ;; 0leq frac{(x+y)^2}{4xy}leq 1 $$
    But I have an aversion to using case-based solutions (checking for $x>0$, $y>0$ etc.) since I feel there must be a neater solution to these kind of problems. So my question is: Is it possible to solve this and these sort of questions using techniques that don't involve checking numerous cases?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1








      Show that the equation below is only possible when $x=y$
      $$ sec^2{theta}=frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}$$






      The only way I can think of doing this is by rewriting it as



      $$ cos^2{theta}=frac{(x+y)^2}{4xy} $$
      then using some inequalities to prove it by using:
      $$ 0leq cos^2{theta}leq 1 ;; text{ therefore } ;; 0leq frac{(x+y)^2}{4xy}leq 1 $$
      But I have an aversion to using case-based solutions (checking for $x>0$, $y>0$ etc.) since I feel there must be a neater solution to these kind of problems. So my question is: Is it possible to solve this and these sort of questions using techniques that don't involve checking numerous cases?










      share|cite|improve this question














      Show that the equation below is only possible when $x=y$
      $$ sec^2{theta}=frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}$$






      The only way I can think of doing this is by rewriting it as



      $$ cos^2{theta}=frac{(x+y)^2}{4xy} $$
      then using some inequalities to prove it by using:
      $$ 0leq cos^2{theta}leq 1 ;; text{ therefore } ;; 0leq frac{(x+y)^2}{4xy}leq 1 $$
      But I have an aversion to using case-based solutions (checking for $x>0$, $y>0$ etc.) since I feel there must be a neater solution to these kind of problems. So my question is: Is it possible to solve this and these sort of questions using techniques that don't involve checking numerous cases?







      algebra-precalculus trigonometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Apr 9 '14 at 21:38









      JayJay

      1,283818




      1,283818






















          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          We have $sec^2 thetage 1$ for all $theta$ at which $sectheta$ is defined. So it is enough to show that $frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}le 1$, with equality only when $x=y$.



          To show that $frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}le 1$, we show equivalently that $(x+y)^2ge 4xy$, or equivalently that $x^2-2xy+y^2ge 0$. But this is clear, since $x^2-2xy+y^2=(x-y)^2$. And we have equality precisely when $x=y$.



          Remark: This is not very different from how you proposed to do things. There are no cases involved. And aversion to cases can be problematic. A consideration of cases (though not in this case) is often a natural approach.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • This is a much neater inequality, I'm not sure why I didn't just stick with $sec^2{theta}$ as it would have saved me from doing the dreaded cases. I don't like doing it with cases just because it feels (to me anyway) like there must exist a more condensed statement that would convey the same thing just in a more succinct way (like in this case), though of course such a form may not always exist but I aspire to try and find them! Thanks
            – Jay
            Apr 9 '14 at 21:55












          • You are welcome. My feeling is that first one should produce a correct proof. Through the process of producing that proof, one may discover a more succinct argument. Historically, even for (in retrospect) fairly elementary theorems, condensed conceptual proofs have sometimes followed first proofs only after many years.
            – André Nicolas
            Apr 9 '14 at 22:01



















          1














          $$sec^2theta=frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}impliestan^2theta=frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}-1=-frac{(x+y)^2-4xy}{(x+y)^2}=-left(frac{x-y}{x+y}right)^2$$



          $$ifftan^2theta+left(frac{x-y}{x+y}right)^2=0 (1)$$



          For real $displaystyle theta,tan^2thetage0$



          and for real $displaystyle x,y; left(frac{x-y}{x+y}right)^2ge0$



          So, each has to be individually zero to satisfy $(1)$






          share|cite|improve this answer





























            0














            $newcommand{+}{^{dagger}}
            newcommand{angles}[1]{leftlangle, #1 ,rightrangle}
            newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace, #1 ,rightrbrace}
            newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack, #1 ,rightrbrack}
            newcommand{ceil}[1]{,leftlceil, #1 ,rightrceil,}
            newcommand{dd}{{rm d}}
            newcommand{down}{downarrow}
            newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
            newcommand{expo}[1]{,{rm e}^{#1},}
            newcommand{fermi}{,{rm f}}
            newcommand{floor}[1]{,leftlfloor #1 rightrfloor,}
            newcommand{half}{{1 over 2}}
            newcommand{ic}{{rm i}}
            newcommand{iff}{Longleftrightarrow}
            newcommand{imp}{Longrightarrow}
            newcommand{isdiv}{,left.rightvert,}
            newcommand{ket}[1]{leftvert #1rightrangle}
            newcommand{ol}[1]{overline{#1}}
            newcommand{pars}[1]{left(, #1 ,right)}
            newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
            newcommand{pp}{{cal P}}
            newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{vphantom{large A},#2,},}
            newcommand{sech}{,{rm sech}}
            newcommand{sgn}{,{rm sgn}}
            newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{{rm d}^{#1} #2}{{rm d} #3^{#1}}}
            newcommand{ul}[1]{underline{#1}}
            newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert, #1 ,rightvert}
            newcommand{wt}[1]{widetilde{#1}}$
            $$
            mbox{Let's}quad r equiv {x over x + y}quadmbox{such that}quad
            {4xy over pars{x + y}^{2}} = 4rpars{1 - r} =1 - pars{2r - 1}^{2} leq 1
            $$




            Since $ds{sec^{2}pars{theta} geq 1}$ the only solution occurs when $ds{r = half}$ which leads to $color{#00f}{large x = y}$.







            share|cite|improve this answer





























              0














              $4xy$ can be rearranged as $(x+y)^2-(x-y)^2$, and therefore $sec^2theta=frac{(x+y)^2-(x-y)^2}{(x+y)^2}=1-left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2$, which is always less than or equal to $1$ because $left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2$ is greater than or equal to $0$.



              Recall that $-1le costhetale1Rightarrow cos^2thetale1Rightarrow sec^2thetage1$.



              We have therefore established that $sec^2thetale1$ and also that $sec^2thetage1$; both of these conditions can be satisfied only if $sec^2theta=1$.



              $Rightarrow 1-left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2=1Rightarrow left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2=0$



              Now if $x$ and $y$ are not equal to $0$, then the denominator $x+yne 0 Rightarrow x=y$ and neither of which is equal to $0 blacksquare$






              share|cite|improve this answer





























                -1














                from jay
                we can show that



                $$(x+y)^2 le 4xy$$



                $$x^2+y^2+2xy le 4xy$$



                $$x^2+y^2-2xy le 0$$



                $$(x-y)^2 le 0$$



                $$x-y le 0$$



                $$x=y$$






                share|cite|improve this answer























                • Welcome to Math SE! Please take a look at MathJax for information about formatting your answer to make it easier to read.
                  – DMcMor
                  May 25 '17 at 4:20











                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                });
                });
                }, "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f747344%2fprove-that-sec2-theta-4xy-xy2-only-when-x-y%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                5 Answers
                5






                active

                oldest

                votes








                5 Answers
                5






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                7














                We have $sec^2 thetage 1$ for all $theta$ at which $sectheta$ is defined. So it is enough to show that $frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}le 1$, with equality only when $x=y$.



                To show that $frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}le 1$, we show equivalently that $(x+y)^2ge 4xy$, or equivalently that $x^2-2xy+y^2ge 0$. But this is clear, since $x^2-2xy+y^2=(x-y)^2$. And we have equality precisely when $x=y$.



                Remark: This is not very different from how you proposed to do things. There are no cases involved. And aversion to cases can be problematic. A consideration of cases (though not in this case) is often a natural approach.






                share|cite|improve this answer























                • This is a much neater inequality, I'm not sure why I didn't just stick with $sec^2{theta}$ as it would have saved me from doing the dreaded cases. I don't like doing it with cases just because it feels (to me anyway) like there must exist a more condensed statement that would convey the same thing just in a more succinct way (like in this case), though of course such a form may not always exist but I aspire to try and find them! Thanks
                  – Jay
                  Apr 9 '14 at 21:55












                • You are welcome. My feeling is that first one should produce a correct proof. Through the process of producing that proof, one may discover a more succinct argument. Historically, even for (in retrospect) fairly elementary theorems, condensed conceptual proofs have sometimes followed first proofs only after many years.
                  – André Nicolas
                  Apr 9 '14 at 22:01
















                7














                We have $sec^2 thetage 1$ for all $theta$ at which $sectheta$ is defined. So it is enough to show that $frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}le 1$, with equality only when $x=y$.



                To show that $frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}le 1$, we show equivalently that $(x+y)^2ge 4xy$, or equivalently that $x^2-2xy+y^2ge 0$. But this is clear, since $x^2-2xy+y^2=(x-y)^2$. And we have equality precisely when $x=y$.



                Remark: This is not very different from how you proposed to do things. There are no cases involved. And aversion to cases can be problematic. A consideration of cases (though not in this case) is often a natural approach.






                share|cite|improve this answer























                • This is a much neater inequality, I'm not sure why I didn't just stick with $sec^2{theta}$ as it would have saved me from doing the dreaded cases. I don't like doing it with cases just because it feels (to me anyway) like there must exist a more condensed statement that would convey the same thing just in a more succinct way (like in this case), though of course such a form may not always exist but I aspire to try and find them! Thanks
                  – Jay
                  Apr 9 '14 at 21:55












                • You are welcome. My feeling is that first one should produce a correct proof. Through the process of producing that proof, one may discover a more succinct argument. Historically, even for (in retrospect) fairly elementary theorems, condensed conceptual proofs have sometimes followed first proofs only after many years.
                  – André Nicolas
                  Apr 9 '14 at 22:01














                7












                7








                7






                We have $sec^2 thetage 1$ for all $theta$ at which $sectheta$ is defined. So it is enough to show that $frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}le 1$, with equality only when $x=y$.



                To show that $frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}le 1$, we show equivalently that $(x+y)^2ge 4xy$, or equivalently that $x^2-2xy+y^2ge 0$. But this is clear, since $x^2-2xy+y^2=(x-y)^2$. And we have equality precisely when $x=y$.



                Remark: This is not very different from how you proposed to do things. There are no cases involved. And aversion to cases can be problematic. A consideration of cases (though not in this case) is often a natural approach.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                We have $sec^2 thetage 1$ for all $theta$ at which $sectheta$ is defined. So it is enough to show that $frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}le 1$, with equality only when $x=y$.



                To show that $frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}le 1$, we show equivalently that $(x+y)^2ge 4xy$, or equivalently that $x^2-2xy+y^2ge 0$. But this is clear, since $x^2-2xy+y^2=(x-y)^2$. And we have equality precisely when $x=y$.



                Remark: This is not very different from how you proposed to do things. There are no cases involved. And aversion to cases can be problematic. A consideration of cases (though not in this case) is often a natural approach.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Apr 9 '14 at 21:51

























                answered Apr 9 '14 at 21:43









                André NicolasAndré Nicolas

                452k36422807




                452k36422807












                • This is a much neater inequality, I'm not sure why I didn't just stick with $sec^2{theta}$ as it would have saved me from doing the dreaded cases. I don't like doing it with cases just because it feels (to me anyway) like there must exist a more condensed statement that would convey the same thing just in a more succinct way (like in this case), though of course such a form may not always exist but I aspire to try and find them! Thanks
                  – Jay
                  Apr 9 '14 at 21:55












                • You are welcome. My feeling is that first one should produce a correct proof. Through the process of producing that proof, one may discover a more succinct argument. Historically, even for (in retrospect) fairly elementary theorems, condensed conceptual proofs have sometimes followed first proofs only after many years.
                  – André Nicolas
                  Apr 9 '14 at 22:01


















                • This is a much neater inequality, I'm not sure why I didn't just stick with $sec^2{theta}$ as it would have saved me from doing the dreaded cases. I don't like doing it with cases just because it feels (to me anyway) like there must exist a more condensed statement that would convey the same thing just in a more succinct way (like in this case), though of course such a form may not always exist but I aspire to try and find them! Thanks
                  – Jay
                  Apr 9 '14 at 21:55












                • You are welcome. My feeling is that first one should produce a correct proof. Through the process of producing that proof, one may discover a more succinct argument. Historically, even for (in retrospect) fairly elementary theorems, condensed conceptual proofs have sometimes followed first proofs only after many years.
                  – André Nicolas
                  Apr 9 '14 at 22:01
















                This is a much neater inequality, I'm not sure why I didn't just stick with $sec^2{theta}$ as it would have saved me from doing the dreaded cases. I don't like doing it with cases just because it feels (to me anyway) like there must exist a more condensed statement that would convey the same thing just in a more succinct way (like in this case), though of course such a form may not always exist but I aspire to try and find them! Thanks
                – Jay
                Apr 9 '14 at 21:55






                This is a much neater inequality, I'm not sure why I didn't just stick with $sec^2{theta}$ as it would have saved me from doing the dreaded cases. I don't like doing it with cases just because it feels (to me anyway) like there must exist a more condensed statement that would convey the same thing just in a more succinct way (like in this case), though of course such a form may not always exist but I aspire to try and find them! Thanks
                – Jay
                Apr 9 '14 at 21:55














                You are welcome. My feeling is that first one should produce a correct proof. Through the process of producing that proof, one may discover a more succinct argument. Historically, even for (in retrospect) fairly elementary theorems, condensed conceptual proofs have sometimes followed first proofs only after many years.
                – André Nicolas
                Apr 9 '14 at 22:01




                You are welcome. My feeling is that first one should produce a correct proof. Through the process of producing that proof, one may discover a more succinct argument. Historically, even for (in retrospect) fairly elementary theorems, condensed conceptual proofs have sometimes followed first proofs only after many years.
                – André Nicolas
                Apr 9 '14 at 22:01











                1














                $$sec^2theta=frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}impliestan^2theta=frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}-1=-frac{(x+y)^2-4xy}{(x+y)^2}=-left(frac{x-y}{x+y}right)^2$$



                $$ifftan^2theta+left(frac{x-y}{x+y}right)^2=0 (1)$$



                For real $displaystyle theta,tan^2thetage0$



                and for real $displaystyle x,y; left(frac{x-y}{x+y}right)^2ge0$



                So, each has to be individually zero to satisfy $(1)$






                share|cite|improve this answer


























                  1














                  $$sec^2theta=frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}impliestan^2theta=frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}-1=-frac{(x+y)^2-4xy}{(x+y)^2}=-left(frac{x-y}{x+y}right)^2$$



                  $$ifftan^2theta+left(frac{x-y}{x+y}right)^2=0 (1)$$



                  For real $displaystyle theta,tan^2thetage0$



                  and for real $displaystyle x,y; left(frac{x-y}{x+y}right)^2ge0$



                  So, each has to be individually zero to satisfy $(1)$






                  share|cite|improve this answer
























                    1












                    1








                    1






                    $$sec^2theta=frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}impliestan^2theta=frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}-1=-frac{(x+y)^2-4xy}{(x+y)^2}=-left(frac{x-y}{x+y}right)^2$$



                    $$ifftan^2theta+left(frac{x-y}{x+y}right)^2=0 (1)$$



                    For real $displaystyle theta,tan^2thetage0$



                    and for real $displaystyle x,y; left(frac{x-y}{x+y}right)^2ge0$



                    So, each has to be individually zero to satisfy $(1)$






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    $$sec^2theta=frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}impliestan^2theta=frac{4xy}{(x+y)^2}-1=-frac{(x+y)^2-4xy}{(x+y)^2}=-left(frac{x-y}{x+y}right)^2$$



                    $$ifftan^2theta+left(frac{x-y}{x+y}right)^2=0 (1)$$



                    For real $displaystyle theta,tan^2thetage0$



                    and for real $displaystyle x,y; left(frac{x-y}{x+y}right)^2ge0$



                    So, each has to be individually zero to satisfy $(1)$







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Apr 10 '14 at 3:58









                    lab bhattacharjeelab bhattacharjee

                    224k15156274




                    224k15156274























                        0














                        $newcommand{+}{^{dagger}}
                        newcommand{angles}[1]{leftlangle, #1 ,rightrangle}
                        newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace, #1 ,rightrbrace}
                        newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack, #1 ,rightrbrack}
                        newcommand{ceil}[1]{,leftlceil, #1 ,rightrceil,}
                        newcommand{dd}{{rm d}}
                        newcommand{down}{downarrow}
                        newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
                        newcommand{expo}[1]{,{rm e}^{#1},}
                        newcommand{fermi}{,{rm f}}
                        newcommand{floor}[1]{,leftlfloor #1 rightrfloor,}
                        newcommand{half}{{1 over 2}}
                        newcommand{ic}{{rm i}}
                        newcommand{iff}{Longleftrightarrow}
                        newcommand{imp}{Longrightarrow}
                        newcommand{isdiv}{,left.rightvert,}
                        newcommand{ket}[1]{leftvert #1rightrangle}
                        newcommand{ol}[1]{overline{#1}}
                        newcommand{pars}[1]{left(, #1 ,right)}
                        newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
                        newcommand{pp}{{cal P}}
                        newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{vphantom{large A},#2,},}
                        newcommand{sech}{,{rm sech}}
                        newcommand{sgn}{,{rm sgn}}
                        newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{{rm d}^{#1} #2}{{rm d} #3^{#1}}}
                        newcommand{ul}[1]{underline{#1}}
                        newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert, #1 ,rightvert}
                        newcommand{wt}[1]{widetilde{#1}}$
                        $$
                        mbox{Let's}quad r equiv {x over x + y}quadmbox{such that}quad
                        {4xy over pars{x + y}^{2}} = 4rpars{1 - r} =1 - pars{2r - 1}^{2} leq 1
                        $$




                        Since $ds{sec^{2}pars{theta} geq 1}$ the only solution occurs when $ds{r = half}$ which leads to $color{#00f}{large x = y}$.







                        share|cite|improve this answer


























                          0














                          $newcommand{+}{^{dagger}}
                          newcommand{angles}[1]{leftlangle, #1 ,rightrangle}
                          newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace, #1 ,rightrbrace}
                          newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack, #1 ,rightrbrack}
                          newcommand{ceil}[1]{,leftlceil, #1 ,rightrceil,}
                          newcommand{dd}{{rm d}}
                          newcommand{down}{downarrow}
                          newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
                          newcommand{expo}[1]{,{rm e}^{#1},}
                          newcommand{fermi}{,{rm f}}
                          newcommand{floor}[1]{,leftlfloor #1 rightrfloor,}
                          newcommand{half}{{1 over 2}}
                          newcommand{ic}{{rm i}}
                          newcommand{iff}{Longleftrightarrow}
                          newcommand{imp}{Longrightarrow}
                          newcommand{isdiv}{,left.rightvert,}
                          newcommand{ket}[1]{leftvert #1rightrangle}
                          newcommand{ol}[1]{overline{#1}}
                          newcommand{pars}[1]{left(, #1 ,right)}
                          newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
                          newcommand{pp}{{cal P}}
                          newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{vphantom{large A},#2,},}
                          newcommand{sech}{,{rm sech}}
                          newcommand{sgn}{,{rm sgn}}
                          newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{{rm d}^{#1} #2}{{rm d} #3^{#1}}}
                          newcommand{ul}[1]{underline{#1}}
                          newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert, #1 ,rightvert}
                          newcommand{wt}[1]{widetilde{#1}}$
                          $$
                          mbox{Let's}quad r equiv {x over x + y}quadmbox{such that}quad
                          {4xy over pars{x + y}^{2}} = 4rpars{1 - r} =1 - pars{2r - 1}^{2} leq 1
                          $$




                          Since $ds{sec^{2}pars{theta} geq 1}$ the only solution occurs when $ds{r = half}$ which leads to $color{#00f}{large x = y}$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer
























                            0












                            0








                            0






                            $newcommand{+}{^{dagger}}
                            newcommand{angles}[1]{leftlangle, #1 ,rightrangle}
                            newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace, #1 ,rightrbrace}
                            newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack, #1 ,rightrbrack}
                            newcommand{ceil}[1]{,leftlceil, #1 ,rightrceil,}
                            newcommand{dd}{{rm d}}
                            newcommand{down}{downarrow}
                            newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
                            newcommand{expo}[1]{,{rm e}^{#1},}
                            newcommand{fermi}{,{rm f}}
                            newcommand{floor}[1]{,leftlfloor #1 rightrfloor,}
                            newcommand{half}{{1 over 2}}
                            newcommand{ic}{{rm i}}
                            newcommand{iff}{Longleftrightarrow}
                            newcommand{imp}{Longrightarrow}
                            newcommand{isdiv}{,left.rightvert,}
                            newcommand{ket}[1]{leftvert #1rightrangle}
                            newcommand{ol}[1]{overline{#1}}
                            newcommand{pars}[1]{left(, #1 ,right)}
                            newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
                            newcommand{pp}{{cal P}}
                            newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{vphantom{large A},#2,},}
                            newcommand{sech}{,{rm sech}}
                            newcommand{sgn}{,{rm sgn}}
                            newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{{rm d}^{#1} #2}{{rm d} #3^{#1}}}
                            newcommand{ul}[1]{underline{#1}}
                            newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert, #1 ,rightvert}
                            newcommand{wt}[1]{widetilde{#1}}$
                            $$
                            mbox{Let's}quad r equiv {x over x + y}quadmbox{such that}quad
                            {4xy over pars{x + y}^{2}} = 4rpars{1 - r} =1 - pars{2r - 1}^{2} leq 1
                            $$




                            Since $ds{sec^{2}pars{theta} geq 1}$ the only solution occurs when $ds{r = half}$ which leads to $color{#00f}{large x = y}$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            $newcommand{+}{^{dagger}}
                            newcommand{angles}[1]{leftlangle, #1 ,rightrangle}
                            newcommand{braces}[1]{leftlbrace, #1 ,rightrbrace}
                            newcommand{bracks}[1]{leftlbrack, #1 ,rightrbrack}
                            newcommand{ceil}[1]{,leftlceil, #1 ,rightrceil,}
                            newcommand{dd}{{rm d}}
                            newcommand{down}{downarrow}
                            newcommand{ds}[1]{displaystyle{#1}}
                            newcommand{expo}[1]{,{rm e}^{#1},}
                            newcommand{fermi}{,{rm f}}
                            newcommand{floor}[1]{,leftlfloor #1 rightrfloor,}
                            newcommand{half}{{1 over 2}}
                            newcommand{ic}{{rm i}}
                            newcommand{iff}{Longleftrightarrow}
                            newcommand{imp}{Longrightarrow}
                            newcommand{isdiv}{,left.rightvert,}
                            newcommand{ket}[1]{leftvert #1rightrangle}
                            newcommand{ol}[1]{overline{#1}}
                            newcommand{pars}[1]{left(, #1 ,right)}
                            newcommand{partiald}[3]{frac{partial^{#1} #2}{partial #3^{#1}}}
                            newcommand{pp}{{cal P}}
                            newcommand{root}[2]{,sqrt[#1]{vphantom{large A},#2,},}
                            newcommand{sech}{,{rm sech}}
                            newcommand{sgn}{,{rm sgn}}
                            newcommand{totald}[3]{frac{{rm d}^{#1} #2}{{rm d} #3^{#1}}}
                            newcommand{ul}[1]{underline{#1}}
                            newcommand{verts}[1]{leftvert, #1 ,rightvert}
                            newcommand{wt}[1]{widetilde{#1}}$
                            $$
                            mbox{Let's}quad r equiv {x over x + y}quadmbox{such that}quad
                            {4xy over pars{x + y}^{2}} = 4rpars{1 - r} =1 - pars{2r - 1}^{2} leq 1
                            $$




                            Since $ds{sec^{2}pars{theta} geq 1}$ the only solution occurs when $ds{r = half}$ which leads to $color{#00f}{large x = y}$.








                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Apr 10 '14 at 4:10









                            Felix MarinFelix Marin

                            67.2k7107141




                            67.2k7107141























                                0














                                $4xy$ can be rearranged as $(x+y)^2-(x-y)^2$, and therefore $sec^2theta=frac{(x+y)^2-(x-y)^2}{(x+y)^2}=1-left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2$, which is always less than or equal to $1$ because $left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2$ is greater than or equal to $0$.



                                Recall that $-1le costhetale1Rightarrow cos^2thetale1Rightarrow sec^2thetage1$.



                                We have therefore established that $sec^2thetale1$ and also that $sec^2thetage1$; both of these conditions can be satisfied only if $sec^2theta=1$.



                                $Rightarrow 1-left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2=1Rightarrow left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2=0$



                                Now if $x$ and $y$ are not equal to $0$, then the denominator $x+yne 0 Rightarrow x=y$ and neither of which is equal to $0 blacksquare$






                                share|cite|improve this answer


























                                  0














                                  $4xy$ can be rearranged as $(x+y)^2-(x-y)^2$, and therefore $sec^2theta=frac{(x+y)^2-(x-y)^2}{(x+y)^2}=1-left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2$, which is always less than or equal to $1$ because $left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2$ is greater than or equal to $0$.



                                  Recall that $-1le costhetale1Rightarrow cos^2thetale1Rightarrow sec^2thetage1$.



                                  We have therefore established that $sec^2thetale1$ and also that $sec^2thetage1$; both of these conditions can be satisfied only if $sec^2theta=1$.



                                  $Rightarrow 1-left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2=1Rightarrow left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2=0$



                                  Now if $x$ and $y$ are not equal to $0$, then the denominator $x+yne 0 Rightarrow x=y$ and neither of which is equal to $0 blacksquare$






                                  share|cite|improve this answer
























                                    0












                                    0








                                    0






                                    $4xy$ can be rearranged as $(x+y)^2-(x-y)^2$, and therefore $sec^2theta=frac{(x+y)^2-(x-y)^2}{(x+y)^2}=1-left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2$, which is always less than or equal to $1$ because $left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2$ is greater than or equal to $0$.



                                    Recall that $-1le costhetale1Rightarrow cos^2thetale1Rightarrow sec^2thetage1$.



                                    We have therefore established that $sec^2thetale1$ and also that $sec^2thetage1$; both of these conditions can be satisfied only if $sec^2theta=1$.



                                    $Rightarrow 1-left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2=1Rightarrow left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2=0$



                                    Now if $x$ and $y$ are not equal to $0$, then the denominator $x+yne 0 Rightarrow x=y$ and neither of which is equal to $0 blacksquare$






                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    $4xy$ can be rearranged as $(x+y)^2-(x-y)^2$, and therefore $sec^2theta=frac{(x+y)^2-(x-y)^2}{(x+y)^2}=1-left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2$, which is always less than or equal to $1$ because $left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2$ is greater than or equal to $0$.



                                    Recall that $-1le costhetale1Rightarrow cos^2thetale1Rightarrow sec^2thetage1$.



                                    We have therefore established that $sec^2thetale1$ and also that $sec^2thetage1$; both of these conditions can be satisfied only if $sec^2theta=1$.



                                    $Rightarrow 1-left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2=1Rightarrow left ( frac{x-y}{x+y} right )^2=0$



                                    Now if $x$ and $y$ are not equal to $0$, then the denominator $x+yne 0 Rightarrow x=y$ and neither of which is equal to $0 blacksquare$







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered Nov 23 '18 at 12:46









                                    Hussain-AlqatariHussain-Alqatari

                                    2997




                                    2997























                                        -1














                                        from jay
                                        we can show that



                                        $$(x+y)^2 le 4xy$$



                                        $$x^2+y^2+2xy le 4xy$$



                                        $$x^2+y^2-2xy le 0$$



                                        $$(x-y)^2 le 0$$



                                        $$x-y le 0$$



                                        $$x=y$$






                                        share|cite|improve this answer























                                        • Welcome to Math SE! Please take a look at MathJax for information about formatting your answer to make it easier to read.
                                          – DMcMor
                                          May 25 '17 at 4:20
















                                        -1














                                        from jay
                                        we can show that



                                        $$(x+y)^2 le 4xy$$



                                        $$x^2+y^2+2xy le 4xy$$



                                        $$x^2+y^2-2xy le 0$$



                                        $$(x-y)^2 le 0$$



                                        $$x-y le 0$$



                                        $$x=y$$






                                        share|cite|improve this answer























                                        • Welcome to Math SE! Please take a look at MathJax for information about formatting your answer to make it easier to read.
                                          – DMcMor
                                          May 25 '17 at 4:20














                                        -1












                                        -1








                                        -1






                                        from jay
                                        we can show that



                                        $$(x+y)^2 le 4xy$$



                                        $$x^2+y^2+2xy le 4xy$$



                                        $$x^2+y^2-2xy le 0$$



                                        $$(x-y)^2 le 0$$



                                        $$x-y le 0$$



                                        $$x=y$$






                                        share|cite|improve this answer














                                        from jay
                                        we can show that



                                        $$(x+y)^2 le 4xy$$



                                        $$x^2+y^2+2xy le 4xy$$



                                        $$x^2+y^2-2xy le 0$$



                                        $$(x-y)^2 le 0$$



                                        $$x-y le 0$$



                                        $$x=y$$







                                        share|cite|improve this answer














                                        share|cite|improve this answer



                                        share|cite|improve this answer








                                        edited May 25 '17 at 5:55









                                        dantopa

                                        6,44932142




                                        6,44932142










                                        answered May 25 '17 at 4:06









                                        user449447user449447

                                        1




                                        1












                                        • Welcome to Math SE! Please take a look at MathJax for information about formatting your answer to make it easier to read.
                                          – DMcMor
                                          May 25 '17 at 4:20


















                                        • Welcome to Math SE! Please take a look at MathJax for information about formatting your answer to make it easier to read.
                                          – DMcMor
                                          May 25 '17 at 4:20
















                                        Welcome to Math SE! Please take a look at MathJax for information about formatting your answer to make it easier to read.
                                        – DMcMor
                                        May 25 '17 at 4:20




                                        Welcome to Math SE! Please take a look at MathJax for information about formatting your answer to make it easier to read.
                                        – DMcMor
                                        May 25 '17 at 4:20


















                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f747344%2fprove-that-sec2-theta-4xy-xy2-only-when-x-y%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                                        ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                                        Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?