Convergence of in $L_1$ and probability [closed]












0














Let $X_n$ be a sequence of random variables such that $X_n → 0$ (converges in probability. Then show that if $|X_n | ≤ A$, for some $A > 0$ and all $n$, then $E[|X_n |] → 0$ and $E[X_n ] → 0$.










share|cite|improve this question













closed as off-topic by saz, Davide Giraudo, Scientifica, Don Thousand, Leucippus Nov 22 '18 at 0:03


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – saz, Davide Giraudo, Scientifica, Don Thousand, Leucippus

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Any thoughts on the problem? What have you tried?
    – saz
    Nov 21 '18 at 12:44










  • As $X_n$ converges in probability, $P(|X_n| > epsilon) ->0$. By Markov inequality, $P(|X_n| > epsilon) < E(X_n)/ epsilon$. Therefore, $E(|X_n|)>0$?
    – Christy
    Nov 21 '18 at 12:55










  • @saz please provide some direction.
    – Christy
    Nov 21 '18 at 13:14
















0














Let $X_n$ be a sequence of random variables such that $X_n → 0$ (converges in probability. Then show that if $|X_n | ≤ A$, for some $A > 0$ and all $n$, then $E[|X_n |] → 0$ and $E[X_n ] → 0$.










share|cite|improve this question













closed as off-topic by saz, Davide Giraudo, Scientifica, Don Thousand, Leucippus Nov 22 '18 at 0:03


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – saz, Davide Giraudo, Scientifica, Don Thousand, Leucippus

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Any thoughts on the problem? What have you tried?
    – saz
    Nov 21 '18 at 12:44










  • As $X_n$ converges in probability, $P(|X_n| > epsilon) ->0$. By Markov inequality, $P(|X_n| > epsilon) < E(X_n)/ epsilon$. Therefore, $E(|X_n|)>0$?
    – Christy
    Nov 21 '18 at 12:55










  • @saz please provide some direction.
    – Christy
    Nov 21 '18 at 13:14














0












0








0







Let $X_n$ be a sequence of random variables such that $X_n → 0$ (converges in probability. Then show that if $|X_n | ≤ A$, for some $A > 0$ and all $n$, then $E[|X_n |] → 0$ and $E[X_n ] → 0$.










share|cite|improve this question













Let $X_n$ be a sequence of random variables such that $X_n → 0$ (converges in probability. Then show that if $|X_n | ≤ A$, for some $A > 0$ and all $n$, then $E[|X_n |] → 0$ and $E[X_n ] → 0$.







probability-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 21 '18 at 12:37









Christy

12110




12110




closed as off-topic by saz, Davide Giraudo, Scientifica, Don Thousand, Leucippus Nov 22 '18 at 0:03


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – saz, Davide Giraudo, Scientifica, Don Thousand, Leucippus

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by saz, Davide Giraudo, Scientifica, Don Thousand, Leucippus Nov 22 '18 at 0:03


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – saz, Davide Giraudo, Scientifica, Don Thousand, Leucippus

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • Any thoughts on the problem? What have you tried?
    – saz
    Nov 21 '18 at 12:44










  • As $X_n$ converges in probability, $P(|X_n| > epsilon) ->0$. By Markov inequality, $P(|X_n| > epsilon) < E(X_n)/ epsilon$. Therefore, $E(|X_n|)>0$?
    – Christy
    Nov 21 '18 at 12:55










  • @saz please provide some direction.
    – Christy
    Nov 21 '18 at 13:14


















  • Any thoughts on the problem? What have you tried?
    – saz
    Nov 21 '18 at 12:44










  • As $X_n$ converges in probability, $P(|X_n| > epsilon) ->0$. By Markov inequality, $P(|X_n| > epsilon) < E(X_n)/ epsilon$. Therefore, $E(|X_n|)>0$?
    – Christy
    Nov 21 '18 at 12:55










  • @saz please provide some direction.
    – Christy
    Nov 21 '18 at 13:14
















Any thoughts on the problem? What have you tried?
– saz
Nov 21 '18 at 12:44




Any thoughts on the problem? What have you tried?
– saz
Nov 21 '18 at 12:44












As $X_n$ converges in probability, $P(|X_n| > epsilon) ->0$. By Markov inequality, $P(|X_n| > epsilon) < E(X_n)/ epsilon$. Therefore, $E(|X_n|)>0$?
– Christy
Nov 21 '18 at 12:55




As $X_n$ converges in probability, $P(|X_n| > epsilon) ->0$. By Markov inequality, $P(|X_n| > epsilon) < E(X_n)/ epsilon$. Therefore, $E(|X_n|)>0$?
– Christy
Nov 21 '18 at 12:55












@saz please provide some direction.
– Christy
Nov 21 '18 at 13:14




@saz please provide some direction.
– Christy
Nov 21 '18 at 13:14










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














Fix any $varepsilon>0$, and observe that
$$
mathbb{E}|X_n| = int_{|X_n| > varepsilon} |X_n| d mathbb{P} + int_{|X_n| leq varepsilon} |X_n| d mathbb{P} leq A mathbb{P}(|X_n| > varepsilon) + varepsilon.
$$



Now use the fact that $X_n to 0$ in probability, and that $varepsilon>0$ was arbitrary.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • So $E|X_n| -> epsilon$ ?
    – Christy
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:42






  • 1




    @Christy, from the displayed inequality, applying limits on both sides we get $$ limsuplimits_{n toinfty } mathbb{E}|X_n| leq varepsilon (1) $$ thanks to the condition $mathbb{P}(|X_n| > varepsilon ) to 0$ (convergence of $X_n$ to $0$ in probability). Since $varepsilon>0$ is arbitrary, the inequality $(1)$ implies that the $lim mathbb{E}|X_n| $ exists and equals $0$.
    – Hayk
    Nov 22 '18 at 4:57




















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














Fix any $varepsilon>0$, and observe that
$$
mathbb{E}|X_n| = int_{|X_n| > varepsilon} |X_n| d mathbb{P} + int_{|X_n| leq varepsilon} |X_n| d mathbb{P} leq A mathbb{P}(|X_n| > varepsilon) + varepsilon.
$$



Now use the fact that $X_n to 0$ in probability, and that $varepsilon>0$ was arbitrary.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • So $E|X_n| -> epsilon$ ?
    – Christy
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:42






  • 1




    @Christy, from the displayed inequality, applying limits on both sides we get $$ limsuplimits_{n toinfty } mathbb{E}|X_n| leq varepsilon (1) $$ thanks to the condition $mathbb{P}(|X_n| > varepsilon ) to 0$ (convergence of $X_n$ to $0$ in probability). Since $varepsilon>0$ is arbitrary, the inequality $(1)$ implies that the $lim mathbb{E}|X_n| $ exists and equals $0$.
    – Hayk
    Nov 22 '18 at 4:57


















2














Fix any $varepsilon>0$, and observe that
$$
mathbb{E}|X_n| = int_{|X_n| > varepsilon} |X_n| d mathbb{P} + int_{|X_n| leq varepsilon} |X_n| d mathbb{P} leq A mathbb{P}(|X_n| > varepsilon) + varepsilon.
$$



Now use the fact that $X_n to 0$ in probability, and that $varepsilon>0$ was arbitrary.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • So $E|X_n| -> epsilon$ ?
    – Christy
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:42






  • 1




    @Christy, from the displayed inequality, applying limits on both sides we get $$ limsuplimits_{n toinfty } mathbb{E}|X_n| leq varepsilon (1) $$ thanks to the condition $mathbb{P}(|X_n| > varepsilon ) to 0$ (convergence of $X_n$ to $0$ in probability). Since $varepsilon>0$ is arbitrary, the inequality $(1)$ implies that the $lim mathbb{E}|X_n| $ exists and equals $0$.
    – Hayk
    Nov 22 '18 at 4:57
















2












2








2






Fix any $varepsilon>0$, and observe that
$$
mathbb{E}|X_n| = int_{|X_n| > varepsilon} |X_n| d mathbb{P} + int_{|X_n| leq varepsilon} |X_n| d mathbb{P} leq A mathbb{P}(|X_n| > varepsilon) + varepsilon.
$$



Now use the fact that $X_n to 0$ in probability, and that $varepsilon>0$ was arbitrary.






share|cite|improve this answer












Fix any $varepsilon>0$, and observe that
$$
mathbb{E}|X_n| = int_{|X_n| > varepsilon} |X_n| d mathbb{P} + int_{|X_n| leq varepsilon} |X_n| d mathbb{P} leq A mathbb{P}(|X_n| > varepsilon) + varepsilon.
$$



Now use the fact that $X_n to 0$ in probability, and that $varepsilon>0$ was arbitrary.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 21 '18 at 20:19









Hayk

2,0721213




2,0721213












  • So $E|X_n| -> epsilon$ ?
    – Christy
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:42






  • 1




    @Christy, from the displayed inequality, applying limits on both sides we get $$ limsuplimits_{n toinfty } mathbb{E}|X_n| leq varepsilon (1) $$ thanks to the condition $mathbb{P}(|X_n| > varepsilon ) to 0$ (convergence of $X_n$ to $0$ in probability). Since $varepsilon>0$ is arbitrary, the inequality $(1)$ implies that the $lim mathbb{E}|X_n| $ exists and equals $0$.
    – Hayk
    Nov 22 '18 at 4:57




















  • So $E|X_n| -> epsilon$ ?
    – Christy
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:42






  • 1




    @Christy, from the displayed inequality, applying limits on both sides we get $$ limsuplimits_{n toinfty } mathbb{E}|X_n| leq varepsilon (1) $$ thanks to the condition $mathbb{P}(|X_n| > varepsilon ) to 0$ (convergence of $X_n$ to $0$ in probability). Since $varepsilon>0$ is arbitrary, the inequality $(1)$ implies that the $lim mathbb{E}|X_n| $ exists and equals $0$.
    – Hayk
    Nov 22 '18 at 4:57


















So $E|X_n| -> epsilon$ ?
– Christy
Nov 21 '18 at 23:42




So $E|X_n| -> epsilon$ ?
– Christy
Nov 21 '18 at 23:42




1




1




@Christy, from the displayed inequality, applying limits on both sides we get $$ limsuplimits_{n toinfty } mathbb{E}|X_n| leq varepsilon (1) $$ thanks to the condition $mathbb{P}(|X_n| > varepsilon ) to 0$ (convergence of $X_n$ to $0$ in probability). Since $varepsilon>0$ is arbitrary, the inequality $(1)$ implies that the $lim mathbb{E}|X_n| $ exists and equals $0$.
– Hayk
Nov 22 '18 at 4:57






@Christy, from the displayed inequality, applying limits on both sides we get $$ limsuplimits_{n toinfty } mathbb{E}|X_n| leq varepsilon (1) $$ thanks to the condition $mathbb{P}(|X_n| > varepsilon ) to 0$ (convergence of $X_n$ to $0$ in probability). Since $varepsilon>0$ is arbitrary, the inequality $(1)$ implies that the $lim mathbb{E}|X_n| $ exists and equals $0$.
– Hayk
Nov 22 '18 at 4:57





Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?