Characterization of interior in metric spaces












0












$begingroup$


I stumbled upon a theorem in my topology book that didn't have a proof. It says:



For every $x in X$ and $A subset X$,



$x in text{Int} A$ iff $d(x, A^C) > 0$



Here Int denotes interior, A^C is complement of A and d is a metric on X.



If x is in interior of A, then there is an open ball contained in A that contains x. Now, I don't have any idea how to use this to prove that distance between x and XA is positive.



The other direction seems even more difficult.



Any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I stumbled upon a theorem in my topology book that didn't have a proof. It says:



    For every $x in X$ and $A subset X$,



    $x in text{Int} A$ iff $d(x, A^C) > 0$



    Here Int denotes interior, A^C is complement of A and d is a metric on X.



    If x is in interior of A, then there is an open ball contained in A that contains x. Now, I don't have any idea how to use this to prove that distance between x and XA is positive.



    The other direction seems even more difficult.



    Any help would be appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I stumbled upon a theorem in my topology book that didn't have a proof. It says:



      For every $x in X$ and $A subset X$,



      $x in text{Int} A$ iff $d(x, A^C) > 0$



      Here Int denotes interior, A^C is complement of A and d is a metric on X.



      If x is in interior of A, then there is an open ball contained in A that contains x. Now, I don't have any idea how to use this to prove that distance between x and XA is positive.



      The other direction seems even more difficult.



      Any help would be appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I stumbled upon a theorem in my topology book that didn't have a proof. It says:



      For every $x in X$ and $A subset X$,



      $x in text{Int} A$ iff $d(x, A^C) > 0$



      Here Int denotes interior, A^C is complement of A and d is a metric on X.



      If x is in interior of A, then there is an open ball contained in A that contains x. Now, I don't have any idea how to use this to prove that distance between x and XA is positive.



      The other direction seems even more difficult.



      Any help would be appreciated.







      general-topology metric-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 25 '18 at 22:05









      windircursewindircurse

      1,106820




      1,106820






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          If for some $r>0$ we have $B(x,r) subseteq A$,
          then let $y$ be any point in $A^complement$.



          We know that $d(x,y) ge r$, because otherwise $y in B(x,r)$ and so $y in A$, contradiction, as $y in A^complement$.



          This holds for all $y$ in the complement so



          $$d(x,A^complement) = inf {d(x,y): y in A^complement }ge r$$



          because $r$ is (as I showed) a lower bound for the set of distances and the inf is the greatest lower bound of the set of distances.



          So if $x in operatorname{int}(A)$ then $d(x,A^complement) > 0$.



          The reverse also holds:



          Suppose that $r = d(x,A^complement) > 0$.
          Let $y in X$ be such that $d(x,y) < r$ (so $y in B(X,r)$, really). Then $y$ cannot be in $A^complement$ because then $d(x,y)$ would be a number $<r$ on the right in the formula



          $$d(x,A^complement) = inf {d(x,z): z in A^complement }$$ and so we'd have $d(x,A^complement) le d(x,y) < r$ which is a contradiction wih the definition of $r$. So $y notin A^complement$ so $y in A$ and we have shown $$B(x,r) subseteq A$$ as required and so $x in operatorname{int}(A)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            For all $xin text{Int}A$ there is $r>0$ with $B(r,x) subset A$. If $d(x,A^c)=0$ there exists some $yin A^c$ s.t. $d(x,y)<r$: a contradiction. Conversely, if $d(x,y)ge r>0$ for all $yin A^c$ then $B(r,x)subset A$, otherwise, there would be some $yin A^ccap B(r,x)$, which contradicts $d(x,y)ge r$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013480%2fcharacterization-of-interior-in-metric-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              If for some $r>0$ we have $B(x,r) subseteq A$,
              then let $y$ be any point in $A^complement$.



              We know that $d(x,y) ge r$, because otherwise $y in B(x,r)$ and so $y in A$, contradiction, as $y in A^complement$.



              This holds for all $y$ in the complement so



              $$d(x,A^complement) = inf {d(x,y): y in A^complement }ge r$$



              because $r$ is (as I showed) a lower bound for the set of distances and the inf is the greatest lower bound of the set of distances.



              So if $x in operatorname{int}(A)$ then $d(x,A^complement) > 0$.



              The reverse also holds:



              Suppose that $r = d(x,A^complement) > 0$.
              Let $y in X$ be such that $d(x,y) < r$ (so $y in B(X,r)$, really). Then $y$ cannot be in $A^complement$ because then $d(x,y)$ would be a number $<r$ on the right in the formula



              $$d(x,A^complement) = inf {d(x,z): z in A^complement }$$ and so we'd have $d(x,A^complement) le d(x,y) < r$ which is a contradiction wih the definition of $r$. So $y notin A^complement$ so $y in A$ and we have shown $$B(x,r) subseteq A$$ as required and so $x in operatorname{int}(A)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                If for some $r>0$ we have $B(x,r) subseteq A$,
                then let $y$ be any point in $A^complement$.



                We know that $d(x,y) ge r$, because otherwise $y in B(x,r)$ and so $y in A$, contradiction, as $y in A^complement$.



                This holds for all $y$ in the complement so



                $$d(x,A^complement) = inf {d(x,y): y in A^complement }ge r$$



                because $r$ is (as I showed) a lower bound for the set of distances and the inf is the greatest lower bound of the set of distances.



                So if $x in operatorname{int}(A)$ then $d(x,A^complement) > 0$.



                The reverse also holds:



                Suppose that $r = d(x,A^complement) > 0$.
                Let $y in X$ be such that $d(x,y) < r$ (so $y in B(X,r)$, really). Then $y$ cannot be in $A^complement$ because then $d(x,y)$ would be a number $<r$ on the right in the formula



                $$d(x,A^complement) = inf {d(x,z): z in A^complement }$$ and so we'd have $d(x,A^complement) le d(x,y) < r$ which is a contradiction wih the definition of $r$. So $y notin A^complement$ so $y in A$ and we have shown $$B(x,r) subseteq A$$ as required and so $x in operatorname{int}(A)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  If for some $r>0$ we have $B(x,r) subseteq A$,
                  then let $y$ be any point in $A^complement$.



                  We know that $d(x,y) ge r$, because otherwise $y in B(x,r)$ and so $y in A$, contradiction, as $y in A^complement$.



                  This holds for all $y$ in the complement so



                  $$d(x,A^complement) = inf {d(x,y): y in A^complement }ge r$$



                  because $r$ is (as I showed) a lower bound for the set of distances and the inf is the greatest lower bound of the set of distances.



                  So if $x in operatorname{int}(A)$ then $d(x,A^complement) > 0$.



                  The reverse also holds:



                  Suppose that $r = d(x,A^complement) > 0$.
                  Let $y in X$ be such that $d(x,y) < r$ (so $y in B(X,r)$, really). Then $y$ cannot be in $A^complement$ because then $d(x,y)$ would be a number $<r$ on the right in the formula



                  $$d(x,A^complement) = inf {d(x,z): z in A^complement }$$ and so we'd have $d(x,A^complement) le d(x,y) < r$ which is a contradiction wih the definition of $r$. So $y notin A^complement$ so $y in A$ and we have shown $$B(x,r) subseteq A$$ as required and so $x in operatorname{int}(A)$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  If for some $r>0$ we have $B(x,r) subseteq A$,
                  then let $y$ be any point in $A^complement$.



                  We know that $d(x,y) ge r$, because otherwise $y in B(x,r)$ and so $y in A$, contradiction, as $y in A^complement$.



                  This holds for all $y$ in the complement so



                  $$d(x,A^complement) = inf {d(x,y): y in A^complement }ge r$$



                  because $r$ is (as I showed) a lower bound for the set of distances and the inf is the greatest lower bound of the set of distances.



                  So if $x in operatorname{int}(A)$ then $d(x,A^complement) > 0$.



                  The reverse also holds:



                  Suppose that $r = d(x,A^complement) > 0$.
                  Let $y in X$ be such that $d(x,y) < r$ (so $y in B(X,r)$, really). Then $y$ cannot be in $A^complement$ because then $d(x,y)$ would be a number $<r$ on the right in the formula



                  $$d(x,A^complement) = inf {d(x,z): z in A^complement }$$ and so we'd have $d(x,A^complement) le d(x,y) < r$ which is a contradiction wih the definition of $r$. So $y notin A^complement$ so $y in A$ and we have shown $$B(x,r) subseteq A$$ as required and so $x in operatorname{int}(A)$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 25 '18 at 22:18









                  Henno BrandsmaHenno Brandsma

                  106k347114




                  106k347114























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      For all $xin text{Int}A$ there is $r>0$ with $B(r,x) subset A$. If $d(x,A^c)=0$ there exists some $yin A^c$ s.t. $d(x,y)<r$: a contradiction. Conversely, if $d(x,y)ge r>0$ for all $yin A^c$ then $B(r,x)subset A$, otherwise, there would be some $yin A^ccap B(r,x)$, which contradicts $d(x,y)ge r$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        For all $xin text{Int}A$ there is $r>0$ with $B(r,x) subset A$. If $d(x,A^c)=0$ there exists some $yin A^c$ s.t. $d(x,y)<r$: a contradiction. Conversely, if $d(x,y)ge r>0$ for all $yin A^c$ then $B(r,x)subset A$, otherwise, there would be some $yin A^ccap B(r,x)$, which contradicts $d(x,y)ge r$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          For all $xin text{Int}A$ there is $r>0$ with $B(r,x) subset A$. If $d(x,A^c)=0$ there exists some $yin A^c$ s.t. $d(x,y)<r$: a contradiction. Conversely, if $d(x,y)ge r>0$ for all $yin A^c$ then $B(r,x)subset A$, otherwise, there would be some $yin A^ccap B(r,x)$, which contradicts $d(x,y)ge r$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          For all $xin text{Int}A$ there is $r>0$ with $B(r,x) subset A$. If $d(x,A^c)=0$ there exists some $yin A^c$ s.t. $d(x,y)<r$: a contradiction. Conversely, if $d(x,y)ge r>0$ for all $yin A^c$ then $B(r,x)subset A$, otherwise, there would be some $yin A^ccap B(r,x)$, which contradicts $d(x,y)ge r$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Nov 25 '18 at 22:18









                          Guacho PerezGuacho Perez

                          3,91411132




                          3,91411132






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013480%2fcharacterization-of-interior-in-metric-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

                              ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

                              Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?