textvdots in LaTeX?











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












Is there a text-mode vertical ellipsis that I can use directly in LaTeX, e.g., named textvdots, texvellipsis or similar?



I don't mean the unicode engines, but LaTeX, since in {Xe/Lua}LaTeX we could probably type in the vertical ellipsis ⋮ directly. Moreover, I don't wish to switch to math mode, such as in (vdots): it produces some undesirable vertical space above the symbol. I've already tried Detexify and symbols-a4.pdf.










share|improve this question
























  • I vote to delete my own question, since it is really misleading. I falsely assumed that vdots is not available in text mode. As @Werner says (thx!), it is not the case: you can use vdotsin either text or math mode.
    – user49915
    Nov 28 at 23:03












  • We don't delete Q&A with upvotes. It's OK if it stays around. Other users might have similar problems and find it useful after all.
    – Martin Scharrer
    Nov 29 at 6:34










  • @MartinScharrer I see. Perhaps, the folks could downvote it, so that it will be deleted?
    – user49915
    Nov 29 at 14:17










  • Well, why not let it be? It does not create a problem.
    – Martin Scharrer
    Nov 30 at 7:04










  • @MartinScharrer I prefer to keep my bullshit footprint low.
    – user49915
    Nov 30 at 22:04















up vote
4
down vote

favorite












Is there a text-mode vertical ellipsis that I can use directly in LaTeX, e.g., named textvdots, texvellipsis or similar?



I don't mean the unicode engines, but LaTeX, since in {Xe/Lua}LaTeX we could probably type in the vertical ellipsis ⋮ directly. Moreover, I don't wish to switch to math mode, such as in (vdots): it produces some undesirable vertical space above the symbol. I've already tried Detexify and symbols-a4.pdf.










share|improve this question
























  • I vote to delete my own question, since it is really misleading. I falsely assumed that vdots is not available in text mode. As @Werner says (thx!), it is not the case: you can use vdotsin either text or math mode.
    – user49915
    Nov 28 at 23:03












  • We don't delete Q&A with upvotes. It's OK if it stays around. Other users might have similar problems and find it useful after all.
    – Martin Scharrer
    Nov 29 at 6:34










  • @MartinScharrer I see. Perhaps, the folks could downvote it, so that it will be deleted?
    – user49915
    Nov 29 at 14:17










  • Well, why not let it be? It does not create a problem.
    – Martin Scharrer
    Nov 30 at 7:04










  • @MartinScharrer I prefer to keep my bullshit footprint low.
    – user49915
    Nov 30 at 22:04













up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











Is there a text-mode vertical ellipsis that I can use directly in LaTeX, e.g., named textvdots, texvellipsis or similar?



I don't mean the unicode engines, but LaTeX, since in {Xe/Lua}LaTeX we could probably type in the vertical ellipsis ⋮ directly. Moreover, I don't wish to switch to math mode, such as in (vdots): it produces some undesirable vertical space above the symbol. I've already tried Detexify and symbols-a4.pdf.










share|improve this question















Is there a text-mode vertical ellipsis that I can use directly in LaTeX, e.g., named textvdots, texvellipsis or similar?



I don't mean the unicode engines, but LaTeX, since in {Xe/Lua}LaTeX we could probably type in the vertical ellipsis ⋮ directly. Moreover, I don't wish to switch to math mode, such as in (vdots): it produces some undesirable vertical space above the symbol. I've already tried Detexify and symbols-a4.pdf.







symbols ellipsis






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 28 at 20:52









Werner

433k609531635




433k609531635










asked Nov 28 at 20:18









user49915

42616




42616












  • I vote to delete my own question, since it is really misleading. I falsely assumed that vdots is not available in text mode. As @Werner says (thx!), it is not the case: you can use vdotsin either text or math mode.
    – user49915
    Nov 28 at 23:03












  • We don't delete Q&A with upvotes. It's OK if it stays around. Other users might have similar problems and find it useful after all.
    – Martin Scharrer
    Nov 29 at 6:34










  • @MartinScharrer I see. Perhaps, the folks could downvote it, so that it will be deleted?
    – user49915
    Nov 29 at 14:17










  • Well, why not let it be? It does not create a problem.
    – Martin Scharrer
    Nov 30 at 7:04










  • @MartinScharrer I prefer to keep my bullshit footprint low.
    – user49915
    Nov 30 at 22:04


















  • I vote to delete my own question, since it is really misleading. I falsely assumed that vdots is not available in text mode. As @Werner says (thx!), it is not the case: you can use vdotsin either text or math mode.
    – user49915
    Nov 28 at 23:03












  • We don't delete Q&A with upvotes. It's OK if it stays around. Other users might have similar problems and find it useful after all.
    – Martin Scharrer
    Nov 29 at 6:34










  • @MartinScharrer I see. Perhaps, the folks could downvote it, so that it will be deleted?
    – user49915
    Nov 29 at 14:17










  • Well, why not let it be? It does not create a problem.
    – Martin Scharrer
    Nov 30 at 7:04










  • @MartinScharrer I prefer to keep my bullshit footprint low.
    – user49915
    Nov 30 at 22:04
















I vote to delete my own question, since it is really misleading. I falsely assumed that vdots is not available in text mode. As @Werner says (thx!), it is not the case: you can use vdotsin either text or math mode.
– user49915
Nov 28 at 23:03






I vote to delete my own question, since it is really misleading. I falsely assumed that vdots is not available in text mode. As @Werner says (thx!), it is not the case: you can use vdotsin either text or math mode.
– user49915
Nov 28 at 23:03














We don't delete Q&A with upvotes. It's OK if it stays around. Other users might have similar problems and find it useful after all.
– Martin Scharrer
Nov 29 at 6:34




We don't delete Q&A with upvotes. It's OK if it stays around. Other users might have similar problems and find it useful after all.
– Martin Scharrer
Nov 29 at 6:34












@MartinScharrer I see. Perhaps, the folks could downvote it, so that it will be deleted?
– user49915
Nov 29 at 14:17




@MartinScharrer I see. Perhaps, the folks could downvote it, so that it will be deleted?
– user49915
Nov 29 at 14:17












Well, why not let it be? It does not create a problem.
– Martin Scharrer
Nov 30 at 7:04




Well, why not let it be? It does not create a problem.
– Martin Scharrer
Nov 30 at 7:04












@MartinScharrer I prefer to keep my bullshit footprint low.
– user49915
Nov 30 at 22:04




@MartinScharrer I prefer to keep my bullshit footprint low.
– user49915
Nov 30 at 22:04










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










The default vdots is defined as



DeclareRobustCommand{vdots}{%
vbox{%
baselineskip 4p@
lineskiplimit z@
kern 6p@
hbox{.}hbox{.}hbox{.}%
}%
}


with no indication of using math mode. So you can just use vdots within the text, or define textvdots for using in text as needed:



enter image description here



documentclass{article}

lettextvdotsvdots

begin{document}

This is verb|textvdots| textvdots{} or verb|vdots| vdots{} in text mode.

end{document}


If the command did not have the above construction that allowed for using within text/math mode, then you can use (for example, when considering alpha that only works in math mode):



newcommand{textalpha}{$alpha$}


or something more intricate



newcommand{textalpha}{ifmmode alphaelse $alpha$fi}


the works in both text and math mode.





For reducing the vertical stretch, redefine textvdots to be similar to vdots only with a smaller baselineskip:



enter image description here



documentclass{article}

makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommand{textalpha}{%
vbox{%
baselineskip 3p@
lineskiplimit z@
kern 6p@
hbox{.}hbox{.}hbox{.}%
}%
}
makeatother

begin{document}

This is verb|$textalpha$| textalpha{} and vdots{} in text mode, for comparison.

end{document}





share|improve this answer





















  • I see. I falsely assumed that vdots is only math-mode. You are right; I apologize. Anyway, thanks for the code!
    – user49915
    Nov 28 at 22:26











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462241%2ftextvdots-in-latex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
4
down vote



accepted










The default vdots is defined as



DeclareRobustCommand{vdots}{%
vbox{%
baselineskip 4p@
lineskiplimit z@
kern 6p@
hbox{.}hbox{.}hbox{.}%
}%
}


with no indication of using math mode. So you can just use vdots within the text, or define textvdots for using in text as needed:



enter image description here



documentclass{article}

lettextvdotsvdots

begin{document}

This is verb|textvdots| textvdots{} or verb|vdots| vdots{} in text mode.

end{document}


If the command did not have the above construction that allowed for using within text/math mode, then you can use (for example, when considering alpha that only works in math mode):



newcommand{textalpha}{$alpha$}


or something more intricate



newcommand{textalpha}{ifmmode alphaelse $alpha$fi}


the works in both text and math mode.





For reducing the vertical stretch, redefine textvdots to be similar to vdots only with a smaller baselineskip:



enter image description here



documentclass{article}

makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommand{textalpha}{%
vbox{%
baselineskip 3p@
lineskiplimit z@
kern 6p@
hbox{.}hbox{.}hbox{.}%
}%
}
makeatother

begin{document}

This is verb|$textalpha$| textalpha{} and vdots{} in text mode, for comparison.

end{document}





share|improve this answer





















  • I see. I falsely assumed that vdots is only math-mode. You are right; I apologize. Anyway, thanks for the code!
    – user49915
    Nov 28 at 22:26















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










The default vdots is defined as



DeclareRobustCommand{vdots}{%
vbox{%
baselineskip 4p@
lineskiplimit z@
kern 6p@
hbox{.}hbox{.}hbox{.}%
}%
}


with no indication of using math mode. So you can just use vdots within the text, or define textvdots for using in text as needed:



enter image description here



documentclass{article}

lettextvdotsvdots

begin{document}

This is verb|textvdots| textvdots{} or verb|vdots| vdots{} in text mode.

end{document}


If the command did not have the above construction that allowed for using within text/math mode, then you can use (for example, when considering alpha that only works in math mode):



newcommand{textalpha}{$alpha$}


or something more intricate



newcommand{textalpha}{ifmmode alphaelse $alpha$fi}


the works in both text and math mode.





For reducing the vertical stretch, redefine textvdots to be similar to vdots only with a smaller baselineskip:



enter image description here



documentclass{article}

makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommand{textalpha}{%
vbox{%
baselineskip 3p@
lineskiplimit z@
kern 6p@
hbox{.}hbox{.}hbox{.}%
}%
}
makeatother

begin{document}

This is verb|$textalpha$| textalpha{} and vdots{} in text mode, for comparison.

end{document}





share|improve this answer





















  • I see. I falsely assumed that vdots is only math-mode. You are right; I apologize. Anyway, thanks for the code!
    – user49915
    Nov 28 at 22:26













up vote
4
down vote



accepted







up vote
4
down vote



accepted






The default vdots is defined as



DeclareRobustCommand{vdots}{%
vbox{%
baselineskip 4p@
lineskiplimit z@
kern 6p@
hbox{.}hbox{.}hbox{.}%
}%
}


with no indication of using math mode. So you can just use vdots within the text, or define textvdots for using in text as needed:



enter image description here



documentclass{article}

lettextvdotsvdots

begin{document}

This is verb|textvdots| textvdots{} or verb|vdots| vdots{} in text mode.

end{document}


If the command did not have the above construction that allowed for using within text/math mode, then you can use (for example, when considering alpha that only works in math mode):



newcommand{textalpha}{$alpha$}


or something more intricate



newcommand{textalpha}{ifmmode alphaelse $alpha$fi}


the works in both text and math mode.





For reducing the vertical stretch, redefine textvdots to be similar to vdots only with a smaller baselineskip:



enter image description here



documentclass{article}

makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommand{textalpha}{%
vbox{%
baselineskip 3p@
lineskiplimit z@
kern 6p@
hbox{.}hbox{.}hbox{.}%
}%
}
makeatother

begin{document}

This is verb|$textalpha$| textalpha{} and vdots{} in text mode, for comparison.

end{document}





share|improve this answer












The default vdots is defined as



DeclareRobustCommand{vdots}{%
vbox{%
baselineskip 4p@
lineskiplimit z@
kern 6p@
hbox{.}hbox{.}hbox{.}%
}%
}


with no indication of using math mode. So you can just use vdots within the text, or define textvdots for using in text as needed:



enter image description here



documentclass{article}

lettextvdotsvdots

begin{document}

This is verb|textvdots| textvdots{} or verb|vdots| vdots{} in text mode.

end{document}


If the command did not have the above construction that allowed for using within text/math mode, then you can use (for example, when considering alpha that only works in math mode):



newcommand{textalpha}{$alpha$}


or something more intricate



newcommand{textalpha}{ifmmode alphaelse $alpha$fi}


the works in both text and math mode.





For reducing the vertical stretch, redefine textvdots to be similar to vdots only with a smaller baselineskip:



enter image description here



documentclass{article}

makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommand{textalpha}{%
vbox{%
baselineskip 3p@
lineskiplimit z@
kern 6p@
hbox{.}hbox{.}hbox{.}%
}%
}
makeatother

begin{document}

This is verb|$textalpha$| textalpha{} and vdots{} in text mode, for comparison.

end{document}






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 28 at 20:47









Werner

433k609531635




433k609531635












  • I see. I falsely assumed that vdots is only math-mode. You are right; I apologize. Anyway, thanks for the code!
    – user49915
    Nov 28 at 22:26


















  • I see. I falsely assumed that vdots is only math-mode. You are right; I apologize. Anyway, thanks for the code!
    – user49915
    Nov 28 at 22:26
















I see. I falsely assumed that vdots is only math-mode. You are right; I apologize. Anyway, thanks for the code!
– user49915
Nov 28 at 22:26




I see. I falsely assumed that vdots is only math-mode. You are right; I apologize. Anyway, thanks for the code!
– user49915
Nov 28 at 22:26


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f462241%2ftextvdots-in-latex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?