Deriving individual probability from conditional probability











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Very simple question - say you have discrete variables $a in S$ and $x in Q$, where $S$ and $Q$ are finite sets. Say also you know the value of $P(a|x)$ for all $S$ and $Q$. How do you derive $P(a)$ for all $a in S$? I'm thinking the formula is something like the following:



$P(a) = frac{sum_{x in Q}P(a|x)}{|Q|}$



Is this correct? What would the formula be if $Q$ were continuous?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • What is $|Q|$? If it is the cardinality of $Q$ then the equation is surely false.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Nov 17 at 0:39






  • 1




    I assume by $P[a]$ and $P[a|x]$ you really mean $P[A=a]$ and $P[A=a|X=x]$ for some random variables $A, X$ and some particular parameters $a,x$.
    – Michael
    Nov 17 at 1:19

















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Very simple question - say you have discrete variables $a in S$ and $x in Q$, where $S$ and $Q$ are finite sets. Say also you know the value of $P(a|x)$ for all $S$ and $Q$. How do you derive $P(a)$ for all $a in S$? I'm thinking the formula is something like the following:



$P(a) = frac{sum_{x in Q}P(a|x)}{|Q|}$



Is this correct? What would the formula be if $Q$ were continuous?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • What is $|Q|$? If it is the cardinality of $Q$ then the equation is surely false.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Nov 17 at 0:39






  • 1




    I assume by $P[a]$ and $P[a|x]$ you really mean $P[A=a]$ and $P[A=a|X=x]$ for some random variables $A, X$ and some particular parameters $a,x$.
    – Michael
    Nov 17 at 1:19















up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Very simple question - say you have discrete variables $a in S$ and $x in Q$, where $S$ and $Q$ are finite sets. Say also you know the value of $P(a|x)$ for all $S$ and $Q$. How do you derive $P(a)$ for all $a in S$? I'm thinking the formula is something like the following:



$P(a) = frac{sum_{x in Q}P(a|x)}{|Q|}$



Is this correct? What would the formula be if $Q$ were continuous?










share|cite|improve this question













Very simple question - say you have discrete variables $a in S$ and $x in Q$, where $S$ and $Q$ are finite sets. Say also you know the value of $P(a|x)$ for all $S$ and $Q$. How do you derive $P(a)$ for all $a in S$? I'm thinking the formula is something like the following:



$P(a) = frac{sum_{x in Q}P(a|x)}{|Q|}$



Is this correct? What would the formula be if $Q$ were continuous?







probability conditional-probability






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 17 at 0:10









ahelwer

1084




1084












  • What is $|Q|$? If it is the cardinality of $Q$ then the equation is surely false.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Nov 17 at 0:39






  • 1




    I assume by $P[a]$ and $P[a|x]$ you really mean $P[A=a]$ and $P[A=a|X=x]$ for some random variables $A, X$ and some particular parameters $a,x$.
    – Michael
    Nov 17 at 1:19




















  • What is $|Q|$? If it is the cardinality of $Q$ then the equation is surely false.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Nov 17 at 0:39






  • 1




    I assume by $P[a]$ and $P[a|x]$ you really mean $P[A=a]$ and $P[A=a|X=x]$ for some random variables $A, X$ and some particular parameters $a,x$.
    – Michael
    Nov 17 at 1:19


















What is $|Q|$? If it is the cardinality of $Q$ then the equation is surely false.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 17 at 0:39




What is $|Q|$? If it is the cardinality of $Q$ then the equation is surely false.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 17 at 0:39




1




1




I assume by $P[a]$ and $P[a|x]$ you really mean $P[A=a]$ and $P[A=a|X=x]$ for some random variables $A, X$ and some particular parameters $a,x$.
– Michael
Nov 17 at 1:19






I assume by $P[a]$ and $P[a|x]$ you really mean $P[A=a]$ and $P[A=a|X=x]$ for some random variables $A, X$ and some particular parameters $a,x$.
– Michael
Nov 17 at 1:19












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










If $A$ and $X$ are random variables and we know $X$ takes values in a discrete set $mathcal{Q}$ then for any real number $a$ we have by the law of total probability:
$$ boxed{P[A=a] = sum_{x in mathcal{Q}} P[A=a|X=x]P[X=x]} quad (1) $$
In the special case when $mathcal{Q}$ is a finite set with $|mathcal{Q}|$ elements, and when $X$ takes values equally likely over all elements of $|mathcal{Q}|$, then $P[X=x] = frac{1}{|mathcal{Q}|}$ for all $x in mathcal{Q}$ and the above formula (1) reduces to:
$$ P[A=a] = sum_{x in mathcal{Q}} P[A=a|X=x]frac{1}{|mathcal{Q}|}$$
which is similar in form to your conjectured formula.



If $X$ is a continuous random variable with PDF $f_X(x)$ then the law of total probability formula (1) is changed to:
$$ boxed{P[A=a] = int_{-infty}^{infty} P[A=a|X=x]f_X(x)dx} $$





Note also that we can only take probabilities of events. So if $Y$ is a random variable, example events are ${Yleq 12}$ or ${Y=8}$ and we can speak of $P[Yleq 12]$ (the probability that $Y$ is less than or equal to 12) and $P[Y=8]$ (the probability that $Y$ is 8) but it makes no sense to speak of $P[Y]$ (the probability that $Y$ is...what???).



So I do not like your notation $P[a]$ and $P[a|x]$ since (i) I do not know if $a$ is supposed to be a random variable or a parameter; (ii) $a$ certainly is not an event so $P[a]$ makes no sense (the probability that $a$ is...what???)






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Brilliant! Thank you for taking the time to decode my question, especially relating it to the special case where $X$ takes values equally likely over all elements of $Q$. To clarify, $a in S$ were possible outcomes given some precondition $x in Q$ which changed the probabilities of outcomes $a in S$. Thank you for introducing this improved notation.
    – ahelwer
    Nov 17 at 1:29













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001808%2fderiving-individual-probability-from-conditional-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










If $A$ and $X$ are random variables and we know $X$ takes values in a discrete set $mathcal{Q}$ then for any real number $a$ we have by the law of total probability:
$$ boxed{P[A=a] = sum_{x in mathcal{Q}} P[A=a|X=x]P[X=x]} quad (1) $$
In the special case when $mathcal{Q}$ is a finite set with $|mathcal{Q}|$ elements, and when $X$ takes values equally likely over all elements of $|mathcal{Q}|$, then $P[X=x] = frac{1}{|mathcal{Q}|}$ for all $x in mathcal{Q}$ and the above formula (1) reduces to:
$$ P[A=a] = sum_{x in mathcal{Q}} P[A=a|X=x]frac{1}{|mathcal{Q}|}$$
which is similar in form to your conjectured formula.



If $X$ is a continuous random variable with PDF $f_X(x)$ then the law of total probability formula (1) is changed to:
$$ boxed{P[A=a] = int_{-infty}^{infty} P[A=a|X=x]f_X(x)dx} $$





Note also that we can only take probabilities of events. So if $Y$ is a random variable, example events are ${Yleq 12}$ or ${Y=8}$ and we can speak of $P[Yleq 12]$ (the probability that $Y$ is less than or equal to 12) and $P[Y=8]$ (the probability that $Y$ is 8) but it makes no sense to speak of $P[Y]$ (the probability that $Y$ is...what???).



So I do not like your notation $P[a]$ and $P[a|x]$ since (i) I do not know if $a$ is supposed to be a random variable or a parameter; (ii) $a$ certainly is not an event so $P[a]$ makes no sense (the probability that $a$ is...what???)






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Brilliant! Thank you for taking the time to decode my question, especially relating it to the special case where $X$ takes values equally likely over all elements of $Q$. To clarify, $a in S$ were possible outcomes given some precondition $x in Q$ which changed the probabilities of outcomes $a in S$. Thank you for introducing this improved notation.
    – ahelwer
    Nov 17 at 1:29

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










If $A$ and $X$ are random variables and we know $X$ takes values in a discrete set $mathcal{Q}$ then for any real number $a$ we have by the law of total probability:
$$ boxed{P[A=a] = sum_{x in mathcal{Q}} P[A=a|X=x]P[X=x]} quad (1) $$
In the special case when $mathcal{Q}$ is a finite set with $|mathcal{Q}|$ elements, and when $X$ takes values equally likely over all elements of $|mathcal{Q}|$, then $P[X=x] = frac{1}{|mathcal{Q}|}$ for all $x in mathcal{Q}$ and the above formula (1) reduces to:
$$ P[A=a] = sum_{x in mathcal{Q}} P[A=a|X=x]frac{1}{|mathcal{Q}|}$$
which is similar in form to your conjectured formula.



If $X$ is a continuous random variable with PDF $f_X(x)$ then the law of total probability formula (1) is changed to:
$$ boxed{P[A=a] = int_{-infty}^{infty} P[A=a|X=x]f_X(x)dx} $$





Note also that we can only take probabilities of events. So if $Y$ is a random variable, example events are ${Yleq 12}$ or ${Y=8}$ and we can speak of $P[Yleq 12]$ (the probability that $Y$ is less than or equal to 12) and $P[Y=8]$ (the probability that $Y$ is 8) but it makes no sense to speak of $P[Y]$ (the probability that $Y$ is...what???).



So I do not like your notation $P[a]$ and $P[a|x]$ since (i) I do not know if $a$ is supposed to be a random variable or a parameter; (ii) $a$ certainly is not an event so $P[a]$ makes no sense (the probability that $a$ is...what???)






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Brilliant! Thank you for taking the time to decode my question, especially relating it to the special case where $X$ takes values equally likely over all elements of $Q$. To clarify, $a in S$ were possible outcomes given some precondition $x in Q$ which changed the probabilities of outcomes $a in S$. Thank you for introducing this improved notation.
    – ahelwer
    Nov 17 at 1:29















up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






If $A$ and $X$ are random variables and we know $X$ takes values in a discrete set $mathcal{Q}$ then for any real number $a$ we have by the law of total probability:
$$ boxed{P[A=a] = sum_{x in mathcal{Q}} P[A=a|X=x]P[X=x]} quad (1) $$
In the special case when $mathcal{Q}$ is a finite set with $|mathcal{Q}|$ elements, and when $X$ takes values equally likely over all elements of $|mathcal{Q}|$, then $P[X=x] = frac{1}{|mathcal{Q}|}$ for all $x in mathcal{Q}$ and the above formula (1) reduces to:
$$ P[A=a] = sum_{x in mathcal{Q}} P[A=a|X=x]frac{1}{|mathcal{Q}|}$$
which is similar in form to your conjectured formula.



If $X$ is a continuous random variable with PDF $f_X(x)$ then the law of total probability formula (1) is changed to:
$$ boxed{P[A=a] = int_{-infty}^{infty} P[A=a|X=x]f_X(x)dx} $$





Note also that we can only take probabilities of events. So if $Y$ is a random variable, example events are ${Yleq 12}$ or ${Y=8}$ and we can speak of $P[Yleq 12]$ (the probability that $Y$ is less than or equal to 12) and $P[Y=8]$ (the probability that $Y$ is 8) but it makes no sense to speak of $P[Y]$ (the probability that $Y$ is...what???).



So I do not like your notation $P[a]$ and $P[a|x]$ since (i) I do not know if $a$ is supposed to be a random variable or a parameter; (ii) $a$ certainly is not an event so $P[a]$ makes no sense (the probability that $a$ is...what???)






share|cite|improve this answer














If $A$ and $X$ are random variables and we know $X$ takes values in a discrete set $mathcal{Q}$ then for any real number $a$ we have by the law of total probability:
$$ boxed{P[A=a] = sum_{x in mathcal{Q}} P[A=a|X=x]P[X=x]} quad (1) $$
In the special case when $mathcal{Q}$ is a finite set with $|mathcal{Q}|$ elements, and when $X$ takes values equally likely over all elements of $|mathcal{Q}|$, then $P[X=x] = frac{1}{|mathcal{Q}|}$ for all $x in mathcal{Q}$ and the above formula (1) reduces to:
$$ P[A=a] = sum_{x in mathcal{Q}} P[A=a|X=x]frac{1}{|mathcal{Q}|}$$
which is similar in form to your conjectured formula.



If $X$ is a continuous random variable with PDF $f_X(x)$ then the law of total probability formula (1) is changed to:
$$ boxed{P[A=a] = int_{-infty}^{infty} P[A=a|X=x]f_X(x)dx} $$





Note also that we can only take probabilities of events. So if $Y$ is a random variable, example events are ${Yleq 12}$ or ${Y=8}$ and we can speak of $P[Yleq 12]$ (the probability that $Y$ is less than or equal to 12) and $P[Y=8]$ (the probability that $Y$ is 8) but it makes no sense to speak of $P[Y]$ (the probability that $Y$ is...what???).



So I do not like your notation $P[a]$ and $P[a|x]$ since (i) I do not know if $a$ is supposed to be a random variable or a parameter; (ii) $a$ certainly is not an event so $P[a]$ makes no sense (the probability that $a$ is...what???)







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 17 at 1:16

























answered Nov 17 at 1:10









Michael

13.2k11325




13.2k11325












  • Brilliant! Thank you for taking the time to decode my question, especially relating it to the special case where $X$ takes values equally likely over all elements of $Q$. To clarify, $a in S$ were possible outcomes given some precondition $x in Q$ which changed the probabilities of outcomes $a in S$. Thank you for introducing this improved notation.
    – ahelwer
    Nov 17 at 1:29




















  • Brilliant! Thank you for taking the time to decode my question, especially relating it to the special case where $X$ takes values equally likely over all elements of $Q$. To clarify, $a in S$ were possible outcomes given some precondition $x in Q$ which changed the probabilities of outcomes $a in S$. Thank you for introducing this improved notation.
    – ahelwer
    Nov 17 at 1:29


















Brilliant! Thank you for taking the time to decode my question, especially relating it to the special case where $X$ takes values equally likely over all elements of $Q$. To clarify, $a in S$ were possible outcomes given some precondition $x in Q$ which changed the probabilities of outcomes $a in S$. Thank you for introducing this improved notation.
– ahelwer
Nov 17 at 1:29






Brilliant! Thank you for taking the time to decode my question, especially relating it to the special case where $X$ takes values equally likely over all elements of $Q$. To clarify, $a in S$ were possible outcomes given some precondition $x in Q$ which changed the probabilities of outcomes $a in S$. Thank you for introducing this improved notation.
– ahelwer
Nov 17 at 1:29




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001808%2fderiving-individual-probability-from-conditional-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?