OpenGL: Get lookAt center from position and orientation with quaternion











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm working with OpenGL ES 2.0 on an Android augmented reality application. I would like to position the openGL camera at the exact same location as my headset (in terms of position and orientation in space). I have access to the position and orientation of the headset in real-time, but the orientation is based on a quaternion.



What I have tried so far: I converted the quaternion to Euler angles to have yaw, pitch and roll angles (which seems fine), and then computed a direction vector :



    float ray = 1.0f;
directionX = ray * (float) (Math.cos(rollRadian) * Math.sin(yawRadian));
directionY = ray * (float) (Math.cos(rollRadian) * Math.cos(yawRadian));
directionZ = ray * (float) Math.sin(rollRadian);


Then, I update my LookAt values :



    // LookAt = translation + direction
mLookAt[0] = headSetX + directionX;
mLookAt[1] = headSetY + directionY;
mLookAt[2] = headSetZ + directionZ;


However, it seems that the direction values are too weak compared to the headset translation, resulting in an incorrect display (ex: I can see my virtual object even when I'm not looking in its direction). I suspect that a part of the issue is related to the ray parameter in the formula above, which was from this question in StackExchange



Questions: Did I miss something with this implementation ? Is there another way to get a LookAt vector (or directly the point where I'm looking to) from a position in world-space and a orientation quaternion ?










share|improve this question


















  • 2




    Don't bother with Euler angles. Simply convert the quaternion + translation directly to a matrix and use its inverse as the view matrix.
    – Nico Schertler
    Nov 15 at 17:10










  • Additionally, roll should only affect the side vectors, not the direction vector.
    – meowgoesthedog
    Nov 15 at 23:19















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm working with OpenGL ES 2.0 on an Android augmented reality application. I would like to position the openGL camera at the exact same location as my headset (in terms of position and orientation in space). I have access to the position and orientation of the headset in real-time, but the orientation is based on a quaternion.



What I have tried so far: I converted the quaternion to Euler angles to have yaw, pitch and roll angles (which seems fine), and then computed a direction vector :



    float ray = 1.0f;
directionX = ray * (float) (Math.cos(rollRadian) * Math.sin(yawRadian));
directionY = ray * (float) (Math.cos(rollRadian) * Math.cos(yawRadian));
directionZ = ray * (float) Math.sin(rollRadian);


Then, I update my LookAt values :



    // LookAt = translation + direction
mLookAt[0] = headSetX + directionX;
mLookAt[1] = headSetY + directionY;
mLookAt[2] = headSetZ + directionZ;


However, it seems that the direction values are too weak compared to the headset translation, resulting in an incorrect display (ex: I can see my virtual object even when I'm not looking in its direction). I suspect that a part of the issue is related to the ray parameter in the formula above, which was from this question in StackExchange



Questions: Did I miss something with this implementation ? Is there another way to get a LookAt vector (or directly the point where I'm looking to) from a position in world-space and a orientation quaternion ?










share|improve this question


















  • 2




    Don't bother with Euler angles. Simply convert the quaternion + translation directly to a matrix and use its inverse as the view matrix.
    – Nico Schertler
    Nov 15 at 17:10










  • Additionally, roll should only affect the side vectors, not the direction vector.
    – meowgoesthedog
    Nov 15 at 23:19













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I'm working with OpenGL ES 2.0 on an Android augmented reality application. I would like to position the openGL camera at the exact same location as my headset (in terms of position and orientation in space). I have access to the position and orientation of the headset in real-time, but the orientation is based on a quaternion.



What I have tried so far: I converted the quaternion to Euler angles to have yaw, pitch and roll angles (which seems fine), and then computed a direction vector :



    float ray = 1.0f;
directionX = ray * (float) (Math.cos(rollRadian) * Math.sin(yawRadian));
directionY = ray * (float) (Math.cos(rollRadian) * Math.cos(yawRadian));
directionZ = ray * (float) Math.sin(rollRadian);


Then, I update my LookAt values :



    // LookAt = translation + direction
mLookAt[0] = headSetX + directionX;
mLookAt[1] = headSetY + directionY;
mLookAt[2] = headSetZ + directionZ;


However, it seems that the direction values are too weak compared to the headset translation, resulting in an incorrect display (ex: I can see my virtual object even when I'm not looking in its direction). I suspect that a part of the issue is related to the ray parameter in the formula above, which was from this question in StackExchange



Questions: Did I miss something with this implementation ? Is there another way to get a LookAt vector (or directly the point where I'm looking to) from a position in world-space and a orientation quaternion ?










share|improve this question













I'm working with OpenGL ES 2.0 on an Android augmented reality application. I would like to position the openGL camera at the exact same location as my headset (in terms of position and orientation in space). I have access to the position and orientation of the headset in real-time, but the orientation is based on a quaternion.



What I have tried so far: I converted the quaternion to Euler angles to have yaw, pitch and roll angles (which seems fine), and then computed a direction vector :



    float ray = 1.0f;
directionX = ray * (float) (Math.cos(rollRadian) * Math.sin(yawRadian));
directionY = ray * (float) (Math.cos(rollRadian) * Math.cos(yawRadian));
directionZ = ray * (float) Math.sin(rollRadian);


Then, I update my LookAt values :



    // LookAt = translation + direction
mLookAt[0] = headSetX + directionX;
mLookAt[1] = headSetY + directionY;
mLookAt[2] = headSetZ + directionZ;


However, it seems that the direction values are too weak compared to the headset translation, resulting in an incorrect display (ex: I can see my virtual object even when I'm not looking in its direction). I suspect that a part of the issue is related to the ray parameter in the formula above, which was from this question in StackExchange



Questions: Did I miss something with this implementation ? Is there another way to get a LookAt vector (or directly the point where I'm looking to) from a position in world-space and a orientation quaternion ?







math opengl-es quaternions






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 15 at 16:10









C.IHM

114




114








  • 2




    Don't bother with Euler angles. Simply convert the quaternion + translation directly to a matrix and use its inverse as the view matrix.
    – Nico Schertler
    Nov 15 at 17:10










  • Additionally, roll should only affect the side vectors, not the direction vector.
    – meowgoesthedog
    Nov 15 at 23:19














  • 2




    Don't bother with Euler angles. Simply convert the quaternion + translation directly to a matrix and use its inverse as the view matrix.
    – Nico Schertler
    Nov 15 at 17:10










  • Additionally, roll should only affect the side vectors, not the direction vector.
    – meowgoesthedog
    Nov 15 at 23:19








2




2




Don't bother with Euler angles. Simply convert the quaternion + translation directly to a matrix and use its inverse as the view matrix.
– Nico Schertler
Nov 15 at 17:10




Don't bother with Euler angles. Simply convert the quaternion + translation directly to a matrix and use its inverse as the view matrix.
– Nico Schertler
Nov 15 at 17:10












Additionally, roll should only affect the side vectors, not the direction vector.
– meowgoesthedog
Nov 15 at 23:19




Additionally, roll should only affect the side vectors, not the direction vector.
– meowgoesthedog
Nov 15 at 23:19

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53323520%2fopengl-get-lookat-center-from-position-and-orientation-with-quaternion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53323520%2fopengl-get-lookat-center-from-position-and-orientation-with-quaternion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?