Online sources without “last edited” date field











up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1












My university requires online sources to include three different dates per entry:




  1. Date of original publication

  2. Date of last edit

  3. date of visiting the website


Well, the first and third date are easy, but what biblatex field corresponds to the second date?




  1. date

  2. ???

  3. urldate


In the end, an entry should look something like




Uthor, A. (1996): A Stackexchange question. <https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/ask>. (Last edited: 2008-04-36) (Last checked: 2018-01-29)




where the dates correspond to the above definitions as




  1. 1996

  2. 2008-04-36

  3. 2018-01-29


How do I approach this? Right now, I just use the note field, but, of course, this is not exactly desirable, since it is not very "clean".



EDIT: just found some other similar questions. I need to work on that, although I have not much knowledge as to which bibmacro I need to edit or, actually, about adding custom fields to entries and incorporating them in macros. I'll see what I can do.




  • biblatex format for online sources


  • What is the best way to handle bibliographies which include a lot of online sources?


  • Biblatex: Custom date fields



I shall investigate them further.










share|improve this question
























  • Are you using biblatex as your tagging suggests? Would you be OK with a biblatex-specific solution?
    – moewe
    Jan 29 at 10:35










  • @moewe Yes, I am using biblatex. I would indeed. Gosh, you're even faster in seeing this question as I am adding information.
    – thymaro
    Jan 29 at 10:38












  • Not really related to your question, but it might be nice to include an archived version of the page as well. :)
    – Andrea Lazzarotto
    Jan 29 at 14:50










  • @AndreaLazzarotto I don't understand. What page are you referring to?
    – thymaro
    Jan 29 at 16:00






  • 1




    @AndreaLazzarotto now I see. I don't know why they need all those dates, but I just figured it's to get a rough frame of reference of how much a page could have changed since my referencing it. Of course, I could make PDFs of those pages and put them in the annex, but in general, pages are pretty stable and don't change much, so they can still be counter checked for veracity of my referencing their content. Of course, pages that do change their content more often, I should consider freezing. I'll talk to my advisor. Thanks for the input.
    – thymaro
    Jan 29 at 19:49















up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1












My university requires online sources to include three different dates per entry:




  1. Date of original publication

  2. Date of last edit

  3. date of visiting the website


Well, the first and third date are easy, but what biblatex field corresponds to the second date?




  1. date

  2. ???

  3. urldate


In the end, an entry should look something like




Uthor, A. (1996): A Stackexchange question. <https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/ask>. (Last edited: 2008-04-36) (Last checked: 2018-01-29)




where the dates correspond to the above definitions as




  1. 1996

  2. 2008-04-36

  3. 2018-01-29


How do I approach this? Right now, I just use the note field, but, of course, this is not exactly desirable, since it is not very "clean".



EDIT: just found some other similar questions. I need to work on that, although I have not much knowledge as to which bibmacro I need to edit or, actually, about adding custom fields to entries and incorporating them in macros. I'll see what I can do.




  • biblatex format for online sources


  • What is the best way to handle bibliographies which include a lot of online sources?


  • Biblatex: Custom date fields



I shall investigate them further.










share|improve this question
























  • Are you using biblatex as your tagging suggests? Would you be OK with a biblatex-specific solution?
    – moewe
    Jan 29 at 10:35










  • @moewe Yes, I am using biblatex. I would indeed. Gosh, you're even faster in seeing this question as I am adding information.
    – thymaro
    Jan 29 at 10:38












  • Not really related to your question, but it might be nice to include an archived version of the page as well. :)
    – Andrea Lazzarotto
    Jan 29 at 14:50










  • @AndreaLazzarotto I don't understand. What page are you referring to?
    – thymaro
    Jan 29 at 16:00






  • 1




    @AndreaLazzarotto now I see. I don't know why they need all those dates, but I just figured it's to get a rough frame of reference of how much a page could have changed since my referencing it. Of course, I could make PDFs of those pages and put them in the annex, but in general, pages are pretty stable and don't change much, so they can still be counter checked for veracity of my referencing their content. Of course, pages that do change their content more often, I should consider freezing. I'll talk to my advisor. Thanks for the input.
    – thymaro
    Jan 29 at 19:49













up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1






1





My university requires online sources to include three different dates per entry:




  1. Date of original publication

  2. Date of last edit

  3. date of visiting the website


Well, the first and third date are easy, but what biblatex field corresponds to the second date?




  1. date

  2. ???

  3. urldate


In the end, an entry should look something like




Uthor, A. (1996): A Stackexchange question. <https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/ask>. (Last edited: 2008-04-36) (Last checked: 2018-01-29)




where the dates correspond to the above definitions as




  1. 1996

  2. 2008-04-36

  3. 2018-01-29


How do I approach this? Right now, I just use the note field, but, of course, this is not exactly desirable, since it is not very "clean".



EDIT: just found some other similar questions. I need to work on that, although I have not much knowledge as to which bibmacro I need to edit or, actually, about adding custom fields to entries and incorporating them in macros. I'll see what I can do.




  • biblatex format for online sources


  • What is the best way to handle bibliographies which include a lot of online sources?


  • Biblatex: Custom date fields



I shall investigate them further.










share|improve this question















My university requires online sources to include three different dates per entry:




  1. Date of original publication

  2. Date of last edit

  3. date of visiting the website


Well, the first and third date are easy, but what biblatex field corresponds to the second date?




  1. date

  2. ???

  3. urldate


In the end, an entry should look something like




Uthor, A. (1996): A Stackexchange question. <https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/ask>. (Last edited: 2008-04-36) (Last checked: 2018-01-29)




where the dates correspond to the above definitions as




  1. 1996

  2. 2008-04-36

  3. 2018-01-29


How do I approach this? Right now, I just use the note field, but, of course, this is not exactly desirable, since it is not very "clean".



EDIT: just found some other similar questions. I need to work on that, although I have not much knowledge as to which bibmacro I need to edit or, actually, about adding custom fields to entries and incorporating them in macros. I'll see what I can do.




  • biblatex format for online sources


  • What is the best way to handle bibliographies which include a lot of online sources?


  • Biblatex: Custom date fields



I shall investigate them further.







biblatex date






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 30 at 3:35









Peter Mortensen

53336




53336










asked Jan 29 at 10:31









thymaro

766423




766423












  • Are you using biblatex as your tagging suggests? Would you be OK with a biblatex-specific solution?
    – moewe
    Jan 29 at 10:35










  • @moewe Yes, I am using biblatex. I would indeed. Gosh, you're even faster in seeing this question as I am adding information.
    – thymaro
    Jan 29 at 10:38












  • Not really related to your question, but it might be nice to include an archived version of the page as well. :)
    – Andrea Lazzarotto
    Jan 29 at 14:50










  • @AndreaLazzarotto I don't understand. What page are you referring to?
    – thymaro
    Jan 29 at 16:00






  • 1




    @AndreaLazzarotto now I see. I don't know why they need all those dates, but I just figured it's to get a rough frame of reference of how much a page could have changed since my referencing it. Of course, I could make PDFs of those pages and put them in the annex, but in general, pages are pretty stable and don't change much, so they can still be counter checked for veracity of my referencing their content. Of course, pages that do change their content more often, I should consider freezing. I'll talk to my advisor. Thanks for the input.
    – thymaro
    Jan 29 at 19:49


















  • Are you using biblatex as your tagging suggests? Would you be OK with a biblatex-specific solution?
    – moewe
    Jan 29 at 10:35










  • @moewe Yes, I am using biblatex. I would indeed. Gosh, you're even faster in seeing this question as I am adding information.
    – thymaro
    Jan 29 at 10:38












  • Not really related to your question, but it might be nice to include an archived version of the page as well. :)
    – Andrea Lazzarotto
    Jan 29 at 14:50










  • @AndreaLazzarotto I don't understand. What page are you referring to?
    – thymaro
    Jan 29 at 16:00






  • 1




    @AndreaLazzarotto now I see. I don't know why they need all those dates, but I just figured it's to get a rough frame of reference of how much a page could have changed since my referencing it. Of course, I could make PDFs of those pages and put them in the annex, but in general, pages are pretty stable and don't change much, so they can still be counter checked for veracity of my referencing their content. Of course, pages that do change their content more often, I should consider freezing. I'll talk to my advisor. Thanks for the input.
    – thymaro
    Jan 29 at 19:49
















Are you using biblatex as your tagging suggests? Would you be OK with a biblatex-specific solution?
– moewe
Jan 29 at 10:35




Are you using biblatex as your tagging suggests? Would you be OK with a biblatex-specific solution?
– moewe
Jan 29 at 10:35












@moewe Yes, I am using biblatex. I would indeed. Gosh, you're even faster in seeing this question as I am adding information.
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 10:38






@moewe Yes, I am using biblatex. I would indeed. Gosh, you're even faster in seeing this question as I am adding information.
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 10:38














Not really related to your question, but it might be nice to include an archived version of the page as well. :)
– Andrea Lazzarotto
Jan 29 at 14:50




Not really related to your question, but it might be nice to include an archived version of the page as well. :)
– Andrea Lazzarotto
Jan 29 at 14:50












@AndreaLazzarotto I don't understand. What page are you referring to?
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 16:00




@AndreaLazzarotto I don't understand. What page are you referring to?
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 16:00




1




1




@AndreaLazzarotto now I see. I don't know why they need all those dates, but I just figured it's to get a rough frame of reference of how much a page could have changed since my referencing it. Of course, I could make PDFs of those pages and put them in the annex, but in general, pages are pretty stable and don't change much, so they can still be counter checked for veracity of my referencing their content. Of course, pages that do change their content more often, I should consider freezing. I'll talk to my advisor. Thanks for the input.
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 19:49




@AndreaLazzarotto now I see. I don't know why they need all those dates, but I just figured it's to get a rough frame of reference of how much a page could have changed since my referencing it. Of course, I could make PDFs of those pages and put them in the annex, but in general, pages are pretty stable and don't change much, so they can still be counter checked for veracity of my referencing their content. Of course, pages that do change their content more often, I should consider freezing. I'll talk to my advisor. Thanks for the input.
– thymaro
Jan 29 at 19:49










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote



accepted










Similar to Biblatex: Custom date fields. We need to define a .dbx file to make the new lasteditdate known to Biber. Then we only need to add a call to printlasteditdate to the URL/URL date macro.



RequirePackage{filecontents}
begin{filecontents*}{jobname.bib}
@online{elk,
author = {Anne Elk},
title = {On the Theory of Brontosauruses},
url = {https://example.edu/~elk/bronto.html},
lasteditdate = {2018-01-15},
urldate = {2018-01-29},
}
end{filecontents*}


begin{filecontents*}{lastedit.dbx}
DeclareDatamodelFields[type=field, datatype=date, skipout]{
lasteditdate,
}
DeclareDatamodelEntryfields{
lasteditday,
lasteditendday,
lasteditendhour,
lasteditendminute,
lasteditendmonth,
lasteditendsecond,
lasteditendtimezone,
lasteditendyear,
lastedithour,
lasteditminute,
lasteditmonth,
lasteditsecond,
lastedittimezone,
lastedityear,
}
end{filecontents*}

documentclass[british]{article}
usepackage{babel}
usepackage{csquotes}
usepackage[backend=biber, datamodel=lastedit, lasteditdate=short]{biblatex}
usepackage{hyperref}
addbibresource{jobname.bib}

NewBibliographyString{lastchanged}
DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{
lastchanged = {last changed},
}

DeclareFieldFormat{lasteditdate}{mkbibparens{bibstring{lastchanged}space#1}}

renewbibmacro*{url+urldate}{%
usebibmacro{url}%
iffieldundef{lastedityear}
{}
{setunit*{addspace}%
printlasteditdate}%
iffieldundef{urlyear}
{}
{setunit*{addspace}%
usebibmacro{urldate}}}

begin{document}
nocite{*}

printbibliography
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • Splendid. You know, it makes so much sense when I'm reading it, but I can't even guess how much time it would take me to find out how to do all this on my own. I'll have to check against the documentation and other similar questions to figure out where to get the information myself for future alterations of the same type. +1 for "On the Theory of Brontosauruses" :D
    – thymaro
    Jan 29 at 11:18










  • I get WARN - Datamodel: Entry 'AsbestosNetwor.2013.ProductsContai' (REF/SiSS_final_report.bib): Invalid field 'lasteditday' for entrytype 'online' from biber 2.10. Same for lasteditmonth and lastedityear. I use biber with--validate_datamodel and I don't use anything else than yyyy-mm-dd. The document compiles as wished, but should I worry about the three warnings per entry?
    – thymaro
    Jan 29 at 23:26






  • 1




    @thymaro You don't need to worry, but I have edited the answer so that the warning should be removed. I adapted the code from an earlier answer which was for an older biblatex version.
    – moewe
    Jan 30 at 8:26










  • fyi, it works without warnings on my system, now. thanks again.
    – thymaro
    Jan 31 at 21:09


















up vote
0
down vote













I can't comment yet, but it should be noted that the .dbx file @moewe created in the TeX should be named the same as the datamodel attribute given to biblatex. It will throw the following error (or something alike) when you try to run the biber %.bcf command:
! Package xkeyval Error: `lasteditdate' undefined in families `blx@opt@pre'.



Hope this saves someone the hour of debugging I just spent on it.



Note to the mods: I am aware this should be a comment on the accepted answer. I simply can't make comments yet :-)






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f412663%2fonline-sources-without-last-edited-date-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted










    Similar to Biblatex: Custom date fields. We need to define a .dbx file to make the new lasteditdate known to Biber. Then we only need to add a call to printlasteditdate to the URL/URL date macro.



    RequirePackage{filecontents}
    begin{filecontents*}{jobname.bib}
    @online{elk,
    author = {Anne Elk},
    title = {On the Theory of Brontosauruses},
    url = {https://example.edu/~elk/bronto.html},
    lasteditdate = {2018-01-15},
    urldate = {2018-01-29},
    }
    end{filecontents*}


    begin{filecontents*}{lastedit.dbx}
    DeclareDatamodelFields[type=field, datatype=date, skipout]{
    lasteditdate,
    }
    DeclareDatamodelEntryfields{
    lasteditday,
    lasteditendday,
    lasteditendhour,
    lasteditendminute,
    lasteditendmonth,
    lasteditendsecond,
    lasteditendtimezone,
    lasteditendyear,
    lastedithour,
    lasteditminute,
    lasteditmonth,
    lasteditsecond,
    lastedittimezone,
    lastedityear,
    }
    end{filecontents*}

    documentclass[british]{article}
    usepackage{babel}
    usepackage{csquotes}
    usepackage[backend=biber, datamodel=lastedit, lasteditdate=short]{biblatex}
    usepackage{hyperref}
    addbibresource{jobname.bib}

    NewBibliographyString{lastchanged}
    DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{
    lastchanged = {last changed},
    }

    DeclareFieldFormat{lasteditdate}{mkbibparens{bibstring{lastchanged}space#1}}

    renewbibmacro*{url+urldate}{%
    usebibmacro{url}%
    iffieldundef{lastedityear}
    {}
    {setunit*{addspace}%
    printlasteditdate}%
    iffieldundef{urlyear}
    {}
    {setunit*{addspace}%
    usebibmacro{urldate}}}

    begin{document}
    nocite{*}

    printbibliography
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer























    • Splendid. You know, it makes so much sense when I'm reading it, but I can't even guess how much time it would take me to find out how to do all this on my own. I'll have to check against the documentation and other similar questions to figure out where to get the information myself for future alterations of the same type. +1 for "On the Theory of Brontosauruses" :D
      – thymaro
      Jan 29 at 11:18










    • I get WARN - Datamodel: Entry 'AsbestosNetwor.2013.ProductsContai' (REF/SiSS_final_report.bib): Invalid field 'lasteditday' for entrytype 'online' from biber 2.10. Same for lasteditmonth and lastedityear. I use biber with--validate_datamodel and I don't use anything else than yyyy-mm-dd. The document compiles as wished, but should I worry about the three warnings per entry?
      – thymaro
      Jan 29 at 23:26






    • 1




      @thymaro You don't need to worry, but I have edited the answer so that the warning should be removed. I adapted the code from an earlier answer which was for an older biblatex version.
      – moewe
      Jan 30 at 8:26










    • fyi, it works without warnings on my system, now. thanks again.
      – thymaro
      Jan 31 at 21:09















    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted










    Similar to Biblatex: Custom date fields. We need to define a .dbx file to make the new lasteditdate known to Biber. Then we only need to add a call to printlasteditdate to the URL/URL date macro.



    RequirePackage{filecontents}
    begin{filecontents*}{jobname.bib}
    @online{elk,
    author = {Anne Elk},
    title = {On the Theory of Brontosauruses},
    url = {https://example.edu/~elk/bronto.html},
    lasteditdate = {2018-01-15},
    urldate = {2018-01-29},
    }
    end{filecontents*}


    begin{filecontents*}{lastedit.dbx}
    DeclareDatamodelFields[type=field, datatype=date, skipout]{
    lasteditdate,
    }
    DeclareDatamodelEntryfields{
    lasteditday,
    lasteditendday,
    lasteditendhour,
    lasteditendminute,
    lasteditendmonth,
    lasteditendsecond,
    lasteditendtimezone,
    lasteditendyear,
    lastedithour,
    lasteditminute,
    lasteditmonth,
    lasteditsecond,
    lastedittimezone,
    lastedityear,
    }
    end{filecontents*}

    documentclass[british]{article}
    usepackage{babel}
    usepackage{csquotes}
    usepackage[backend=biber, datamodel=lastedit, lasteditdate=short]{biblatex}
    usepackage{hyperref}
    addbibresource{jobname.bib}

    NewBibliographyString{lastchanged}
    DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{
    lastchanged = {last changed},
    }

    DeclareFieldFormat{lasteditdate}{mkbibparens{bibstring{lastchanged}space#1}}

    renewbibmacro*{url+urldate}{%
    usebibmacro{url}%
    iffieldundef{lastedityear}
    {}
    {setunit*{addspace}%
    printlasteditdate}%
    iffieldundef{urlyear}
    {}
    {setunit*{addspace}%
    usebibmacro{urldate}}}

    begin{document}
    nocite{*}

    printbibliography
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer























    • Splendid. You know, it makes so much sense when I'm reading it, but I can't even guess how much time it would take me to find out how to do all this on my own. I'll have to check against the documentation and other similar questions to figure out where to get the information myself for future alterations of the same type. +1 for "On the Theory of Brontosauruses" :D
      – thymaro
      Jan 29 at 11:18










    • I get WARN - Datamodel: Entry 'AsbestosNetwor.2013.ProductsContai' (REF/SiSS_final_report.bib): Invalid field 'lasteditday' for entrytype 'online' from biber 2.10. Same for lasteditmonth and lastedityear. I use biber with--validate_datamodel and I don't use anything else than yyyy-mm-dd. The document compiles as wished, but should I worry about the three warnings per entry?
      – thymaro
      Jan 29 at 23:26






    • 1




      @thymaro You don't need to worry, but I have edited the answer so that the warning should be removed. I adapted the code from an earlier answer which was for an older biblatex version.
      – moewe
      Jan 30 at 8:26










    • fyi, it works without warnings on my system, now. thanks again.
      – thymaro
      Jan 31 at 21:09













    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted






    Similar to Biblatex: Custom date fields. We need to define a .dbx file to make the new lasteditdate known to Biber. Then we only need to add a call to printlasteditdate to the URL/URL date macro.



    RequirePackage{filecontents}
    begin{filecontents*}{jobname.bib}
    @online{elk,
    author = {Anne Elk},
    title = {On the Theory of Brontosauruses},
    url = {https://example.edu/~elk/bronto.html},
    lasteditdate = {2018-01-15},
    urldate = {2018-01-29},
    }
    end{filecontents*}


    begin{filecontents*}{lastedit.dbx}
    DeclareDatamodelFields[type=field, datatype=date, skipout]{
    lasteditdate,
    }
    DeclareDatamodelEntryfields{
    lasteditday,
    lasteditendday,
    lasteditendhour,
    lasteditendminute,
    lasteditendmonth,
    lasteditendsecond,
    lasteditendtimezone,
    lasteditendyear,
    lastedithour,
    lasteditminute,
    lasteditmonth,
    lasteditsecond,
    lastedittimezone,
    lastedityear,
    }
    end{filecontents*}

    documentclass[british]{article}
    usepackage{babel}
    usepackage{csquotes}
    usepackage[backend=biber, datamodel=lastedit, lasteditdate=short]{biblatex}
    usepackage{hyperref}
    addbibresource{jobname.bib}

    NewBibliographyString{lastchanged}
    DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{
    lastchanged = {last changed},
    }

    DeclareFieldFormat{lasteditdate}{mkbibparens{bibstring{lastchanged}space#1}}

    renewbibmacro*{url+urldate}{%
    usebibmacro{url}%
    iffieldundef{lastedityear}
    {}
    {setunit*{addspace}%
    printlasteditdate}%
    iffieldundef{urlyear}
    {}
    {setunit*{addspace}%
    usebibmacro{urldate}}}

    begin{document}
    nocite{*}

    printbibliography
    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer














    Similar to Biblatex: Custom date fields. We need to define a .dbx file to make the new lasteditdate known to Biber. Then we only need to add a call to printlasteditdate to the URL/URL date macro.



    RequirePackage{filecontents}
    begin{filecontents*}{jobname.bib}
    @online{elk,
    author = {Anne Elk},
    title = {On the Theory of Brontosauruses},
    url = {https://example.edu/~elk/bronto.html},
    lasteditdate = {2018-01-15},
    urldate = {2018-01-29},
    }
    end{filecontents*}


    begin{filecontents*}{lastedit.dbx}
    DeclareDatamodelFields[type=field, datatype=date, skipout]{
    lasteditdate,
    }
    DeclareDatamodelEntryfields{
    lasteditday,
    lasteditendday,
    lasteditendhour,
    lasteditendminute,
    lasteditendmonth,
    lasteditendsecond,
    lasteditendtimezone,
    lasteditendyear,
    lastedithour,
    lasteditminute,
    lasteditmonth,
    lasteditsecond,
    lastedittimezone,
    lastedityear,
    }
    end{filecontents*}

    documentclass[british]{article}
    usepackage{babel}
    usepackage{csquotes}
    usepackage[backend=biber, datamodel=lastedit, lasteditdate=short]{biblatex}
    usepackage{hyperref}
    addbibresource{jobname.bib}

    NewBibliographyString{lastchanged}
    DefineBibliographyStrings{english}{
    lastchanged = {last changed},
    }

    DeclareFieldFormat{lasteditdate}{mkbibparens{bibstring{lastchanged}space#1}}

    renewbibmacro*{url+urldate}{%
    usebibmacro{url}%
    iffieldundef{lastedityear}
    {}
    {setunit*{addspace}%
    printlasteditdate}%
    iffieldundef{urlyear}
    {}
    {setunit*{addspace}%
    usebibmacro{urldate}}}

    begin{document}
    nocite{*}

    printbibliography
    end{document}


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jan 30 at 8:25

























    answered Jan 29 at 10:52









    moewe

    84.7k9108327




    84.7k9108327












    • Splendid. You know, it makes so much sense when I'm reading it, but I can't even guess how much time it would take me to find out how to do all this on my own. I'll have to check against the documentation and other similar questions to figure out where to get the information myself for future alterations of the same type. +1 for "On the Theory of Brontosauruses" :D
      – thymaro
      Jan 29 at 11:18










    • I get WARN - Datamodel: Entry 'AsbestosNetwor.2013.ProductsContai' (REF/SiSS_final_report.bib): Invalid field 'lasteditday' for entrytype 'online' from biber 2.10. Same for lasteditmonth and lastedityear. I use biber with--validate_datamodel and I don't use anything else than yyyy-mm-dd. The document compiles as wished, but should I worry about the three warnings per entry?
      – thymaro
      Jan 29 at 23:26






    • 1




      @thymaro You don't need to worry, but I have edited the answer so that the warning should be removed. I adapted the code from an earlier answer which was for an older biblatex version.
      – moewe
      Jan 30 at 8:26










    • fyi, it works without warnings on my system, now. thanks again.
      – thymaro
      Jan 31 at 21:09


















    • Splendid. You know, it makes so much sense when I'm reading it, but I can't even guess how much time it would take me to find out how to do all this on my own. I'll have to check against the documentation and other similar questions to figure out where to get the information myself for future alterations of the same type. +1 for "On the Theory of Brontosauruses" :D
      – thymaro
      Jan 29 at 11:18










    • I get WARN - Datamodel: Entry 'AsbestosNetwor.2013.ProductsContai' (REF/SiSS_final_report.bib): Invalid field 'lasteditday' for entrytype 'online' from biber 2.10. Same for lasteditmonth and lastedityear. I use biber with--validate_datamodel and I don't use anything else than yyyy-mm-dd. The document compiles as wished, but should I worry about the three warnings per entry?
      – thymaro
      Jan 29 at 23:26






    • 1




      @thymaro You don't need to worry, but I have edited the answer so that the warning should be removed. I adapted the code from an earlier answer which was for an older biblatex version.
      – moewe
      Jan 30 at 8:26










    • fyi, it works without warnings on my system, now. thanks again.
      – thymaro
      Jan 31 at 21:09
















    Splendid. You know, it makes so much sense when I'm reading it, but I can't even guess how much time it would take me to find out how to do all this on my own. I'll have to check against the documentation and other similar questions to figure out where to get the information myself for future alterations of the same type. +1 for "On the Theory of Brontosauruses" :D
    – thymaro
    Jan 29 at 11:18




    Splendid. You know, it makes so much sense when I'm reading it, but I can't even guess how much time it would take me to find out how to do all this on my own. I'll have to check against the documentation and other similar questions to figure out where to get the information myself for future alterations of the same type. +1 for "On the Theory of Brontosauruses" :D
    – thymaro
    Jan 29 at 11:18












    I get WARN - Datamodel: Entry 'AsbestosNetwor.2013.ProductsContai' (REF/SiSS_final_report.bib): Invalid field 'lasteditday' for entrytype 'online' from biber 2.10. Same for lasteditmonth and lastedityear. I use biber with--validate_datamodel and I don't use anything else than yyyy-mm-dd. The document compiles as wished, but should I worry about the three warnings per entry?
    – thymaro
    Jan 29 at 23:26




    I get WARN - Datamodel: Entry 'AsbestosNetwor.2013.ProductsContai' (REF/SiSS_final_report.bib): Invalid field 'lasteditday' for entrytype 'online' from biber 2.10. Same for lasteditmonth and lastedityear. I use biber with--validate_datamodel and I don't use anything else than yyyy-mm-dd. The document compiles as wished, but should I worry about the three warnings per entry?
    – thymaro
    Jan 29 at 23:26




    1




    1




    @thymaro You don't need to worry, but I have edited the answer so that the warning should be removed. I adapted the code from an earlier answer which was for an older biblatex version.
    – moewe
    Jan 30 at 8:26




    @thymaro You don't need to worry, but I have edited the answer so that the warning should be removed. I adapted the code from an earlier answer which was for an older biblatex version.
    – moewe
    Jan 30 at 8:26












    fyi, it works without warnings on my system, now. thanks again.
    – thymaro
    Jan 31 at 21:09




    fyi, it works without warnings on my system, now. thanks again.
    – thymaro
    Jan 31 at 21:09










    up vote
    0
    down vote













    I can't comment yet, but it should be noted that the .dbx file @moewe created in the TeX should be named the same as the datamodel attribute given to biblatex. It will throw the following error (or something alike) when you try to run the biber %.bcf command:
    ! Package xkeyval Error: `lasteditdate' undefined in families `blx@opt@pre'.



    Hope this saves someone the hour of debugging I just spent on it.



    Note to the mods: I am aware this should be a comment on the accepted answer. I simply can't make comments yet :-)






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      I can't comment yet, but it should be noted that the .dbx file @moewe created in the TeX should be named the same as the datamodel attribute given to biblatex. It will throw the following error (or something alike) when you try to run the biber %.bcf command:
      ! Package xkeyval Error: `lasteditdate' undefined in families `blx@opt@pre'.



      Hope this saves someone the hour of debugging I just spent on it.



      Note to the mods: I am aware this should be a comment on the accepted answer. I simply can't make comments yet :-)






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        I can't comment yet, but it should be noted that the .dbx file @moewe created in the TeX should be named the same as the datamodel attribute given to biblatex. It will throw the following error (or something alike) when you try to run the biber %.bcf command:
        ! Package xkeyval Error: `lasteditdate' undefined in families `blx@opt@pre'.



        Hope this saves someone the hour of debugging I just spent on it.



        Note to the mods: I am aware this should be a comment on the accepted answer. I simply can't make comments yet :-)






        share|improve this answer












        I can't comment yet, but it should be noted that the .dbx file @moewe created in the TeX should be named the same as the datamodel attribute given to biblatex. It will throw the following error (or something alike) when you try to run the biber %.bcf command:
        ! Package xkeyval Error: `lasteditdate' undefined in families `blx@opt@pre'.



        Hope this saves someone the hour of debugging I just spent on it.



        Note to the mods: I am aware this should be a comment on the accepted answer. I simply can't make comments yet :-)







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 6 at 14:29









        MagicLegend

        11




        11






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f412663%2fonline-sources-without-last-edited-date-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

            ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

            Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?