iterating over arrays in MYSQL











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Is there a way to pass an array into a MySQL query and return the results as another array ?(apart from using cursors which would be an overkill for my use case)



For a single id, my query looks like this.



SET @userId = '04b452cd59dcc656'
Select user_account_number from userstore where u_id = @userId ;


Instead of sending each id at a time, I am trying to send a list and return a list



SET @userId = ('04b452cd59dcc656','eqwe52cddasfsd656');
<query returning the list of account numbers>


Also - I think this would be efficient over just sending one id at a time. Thoughts ?










share|improve this question






















  • Mysql does not implement any arrays. You can use string concatenation to dynamically create sql statements and to create concatenated, comma delimited output.
    – Shadow
    Nov 14 at 23:08















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Is there a way to pass an array into a MySQL query and return the results as another array ?(apart from using cursors which would be an overkill for my use case)



For a single id, my query looks like this.



SET @userId = '04b452cd59dcc656'
Select user_account_number from userstore where u_id = @userId ;


Instead of sending each id at a time, I am trying to send a list and return a list



SET @userId = ('04b452cd59dcc656','eqwe52cddasfsd656');
<query returning the list of account numbers>


Also - I think this would be efficient over just sending one id at a time. Thoughts ?










share|improve this question






















  • Mysql does not implement any arrays. You can use string concatenation to dynamically create sql statements and to create concatenated, comma delimited output.
    – Shadow
    Nov 14 at 23:08













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Is there a way to pass an array into a MySQL query and return the results as another array ?(apart from using cursors which would be an overkill for my use case)



For a single id, my query looks like this.



SET @userId = '04b452cd59dcc656'
Select user_account_number from userstore where u_id = @userId ;


Instead of sending each id at a time, I am trying to send a list and return a list



SET @userId = ('04b452cd59dcc656','eqwe52cddasfsd656');
<query returning the list of account numbers>


Also - I think this would be efficient over just sending one id at a time. Thoughts ?










share|improve this question













Is there a way to pass an array into a MySQL query and return the results as another array ?(apart from using cursors which would be an overkill for my use case)



For a single id, my query looks like this.



SET @userId = '04b452cd59dcc656'
Select user_account_number from userstore where u_id = @userId ;


Instead of sending each id at a time, I am trying to send a list and return a list



SET @userId = ('04b452cd59dcc656','eqwe52cddasfsd656');
<query returning the list of account numbers>


Also - I think this would be efficient over just sending one id at a time. Thoughts ?







mysql sql






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 14 at 22:52









user5566364

5618




5618












  • Mysql does not implement any arrays. You can use string concatenation to dynamically create sql statements and to create concatenated, comma delimited output.
    – Shadow
    Nov 14 at 23:08


















  • Mysql does not implement any arrays. You can use string concatenation to dynamically create sql statements and to create concatenated, comma delimited output.
    – Shadow
    Nov 14 at 23:08
















Mysql does not implement any arrays. You can use string concatenation to dynamically create sql statements and to create concatenated, comma delimited output.
– Shadow
Nov 14 at 23:08




Mysql does not implement any arrays. You can use string concatenation to dynamically create sql statements and to create concatenated, comma delimited output.
– Shadow
Nov 14 at 23:08












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










You can use IN:



select user_account_number
from userstore
where u_id in ('04b452cd59dcc656', 'eqwe52cddasfsd656') ;


Using variables is trickier. If you know a maximum number, you can do:



select user_account_number
from userstore
where u_id in (@id1, @id2);


Not satisfying, but it does the job. Similarly unsatisfying is FIND_IN_SET():



set @ids = '04b452cd59dcc656,eqwe52cddasfsd656';

select user_account_number
from userstore
where find_in_set(u_id, @ids) > 0;


Alas, this won't use an index.



Finally there is dynamic SQL:



set @sql = concat('select user_account_number from userstore where u_id in (''',
replace(ids, ',', ''','''),
''')'
);

prepare s from @sql;
execute s;





share|improve this answer





















  • Thanks. The first two does not work as the length of the array is not fixed and is not known to me before hand. The third one works. But , why do you call it 'not satisfying' ?And also did not follow your comment FIND_IN_SET is 'similarly unsatisfying'. Similarly unsatisfying to what ? I don't see anything else in that query that can be unsatisfying. :O
    – user5566364
    Nov 15 at 0:39










  • @user5566364 . . . Having to use dynamic SQL to solve this problem is a sad reality of the SQL language.
    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 15 at 0:46











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53309928%2fiterating-over-arrays-in-mysql%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote



accepted










You can use IN:



select user_account_number
from userstore
where u_id in ('04b452cd59dcc656', 'eqwe52cddasfsd656') ;


Using variables is trickier. If you know a maximum number, you can do:



select user_account_number
from userstore
where u_id in (@id1, @id2);


Not satisfying, but it does the job. Similarly unsatisfying is FIND_IN_SET():



set @ids = '04b452cd59dcc656,eqwe52cddasfsd656';

select user_account_number
from userstore
where find_in_set(u_id, @ids) > 0;


Alas, this won't use an index.



Finally there is dynamic SQL:



set @sql = concat('select user_account_number from userstore where u_id in (''',
replace(ids, ',', ''','''),
''')'
);

prepare s from @sql;
execute s;





share|improve this answer





















  • Thanks. The first two does not work as the length of the array is not fixed and is not known to me before hand. The third one works. But , why do you call it 'not satisfying' ?And also did not follow your comment FIND_IN_SET is 'similarly unsatisfying'. Similarly unsatisfying to what ? I don't see anything else in that query that can be unsatisfying. :O
    – user5566364
    Nov 15 at 0:39










  • @user5566364 . . . Having to use dynamic SQL to solve this problem is a sad reality of the SQL language.
    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 15 at 0:46















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










You can use IN:



select user_account_number
from userstore
where u_id in ('04b452cd59dcc656', 'eqwe52cddasfsd656') ;


Using variables is trickier. If you know a maximum number, you can do:



select user_account_number
from userstore
where u_id in (@id1, @id2);


Not satisfying, but it does the job. Similarly unsatisfying is FIND_IN_SET():



set @ids = '04b452cd59dcc656,eqwe52cddasfsd656';

select user_account_number
from userstore
where find_in_set(u_id, @ids) > 0;


Alas, this won't use an index.



Finally there is dynamic SQL:



set @sql = concat('select user_account_number from userstore where u_id in (''',
replace(ids, ',', ''','''),
''')'
);

prepare s from @sql;
execute s;





share|improve this answer





















  • Thanks. The first two does not work as the length of the array is not fixed and is not known to me before hand. The third one works. But , why do you call it 'not satisfying' ?And also did not follow your comment FIND_IN_SET is 'similarly unsatisfying'. Similarly unsatisfying to what ? I don't see anything else in that query that can be unsatisfying. :O
    – user5566364
    Nov 15 at 0:39










  • @user5566364 . . . Having to use dynamic SQL to solve this problem is a sad reality of the SQL language.
    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 15 at 0:46













up vote
0
down vote



accepted







up vote
0
down vote



accepted






You can use IN:



select user_account_number
from userstore
where u_id in ('04b452cd59dcc656', 'eqwe52cddasfsd656') ;


Using variables is trickier. If you know a maximum number, you can do:



select user_account_number
from userstore
where u_id in (@id1, @id2);


Not satisfying, but it does the job. Similarly unsatisfying is FIND_IN_SET():



set @ids = '04b452cd59dcc656,eqwe52cddasfsd656';

select user_account_number
from userstore
where find_in_set(u_id, @ids) > 0;


Alas, this won't use an index.



Finally there is dynamic SQL:



set @sql = concat('select user_account_number from userstore where u_id in (''',
replace(ids, ',', ''','''),
''')'
);

prepare s from @sql;
execute s;





share|improve this answer












You can use IN:



select user_account_number
from userstore
where u_id in ('04b452cd59dcc656', 'eqwe52cddasfsd656') ;


Using variables is trickier. If you know a maximum number, you can do:



select user_account_number
from userstore
where u_id in (@id1, @id2);


Not satisfying, but it does the job. Similarly unsatisfying is FIND_IN_SET():



set @ids = '04b452cd59dcc656,eqwe52cddasfsd656';

select user_account_number
from userstore
where find_in_set(u_id, @ids) > 0;


Alas, this won't use an index.



Finally there is dynamic SQL:



set @sql = concat('select user_account_number from userstore where u_id in (''',
replace(ids, ',', ''','''),
''')'
);

prepare s from @sql;
execute s;






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 15 at 0:28









Gordon Linoff

751k34286394




751k34286394












  • Thanks. The first two does not work as the length of the array is not fixed and is not known to me before hand. The third one works. But , why do you call it 'not satisfying' ?And also did not follow your comment FIND_IN_SET is 'similarly unsatisfying'. Similarly unsatisfying to what ? I don't see anything else in that query that can be unsatisfying. :O
    – user5566364
    Nov 15 at 0:39










  • @user5566364 . . . Having to use dynamic SQL to solve this problem is a sad reality of the SQL language.
    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 15 at 0:46


















  • Thanks. The first two does not work as the length of the array is not fixed and is not known to me before hand. The third one works. But , why do you call it 'not satisfying' ?And also did not follow your comment FIND_IN_SET is 'similarly unsatisfying'. Similarly unsatisfying to what ? I don't see anything else in that query that can be unsatisfying. :O
    – user5566364
    Nov 15 at 0:39










  • @user5566364 . . . Having to use dynamic SQL to solve this problem is a sad reality of the SQL language.
    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 15 at 0:46
















Thanks. The first two does not work as the length of the array is not fixed and is not known to me before hand. The third one works. But , why do you call it 'not satisfying' ?And also did not follow your comment FIND_IN_SET is 'similarly unsatisfying'. Similarly unsatisfying to what ? I don't see anything else in that query that can be unsatisfying. :O
– user5566364
Nov 15 at 0:39




Thanks. The first two does not work as the length of the array is not fixed and is not known to me before hand. The third one works. But , why do you call it 'not satisfying' ?And also did not follow your comment FIND_IN_SET is 'similarly unsatisfying'. Similarly unsatisfying to what ? I don't see anything else in that query that can be unsatisfying. :O
– user5566364
Nov 15 at 0:39












@user5566364 . . . Having to use dynamic SQL to solve this problem is a sad reality of the SQL language.
– Gordon Linoff
Nov 15 at 0:46




@user5566364 . . . Having to use dynamic SQL to solve this problem is a sad reality of the SQL language.
– Gordon Linoff
Nov 15 at 0:46


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53309928%2fiterating-over-arrays-in-mysql%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Biblatex bibliography style without URLs when DOI exists (in Overleaf with Zotero bibliography)

ComboBox Display Member on multiple fields

Is it possible to collect Nectar points via Trainline?